<<

Alternative A3

Ž Development Alternatives • North ground transportation access • North passenger processing: check-in, • Optional south passenger processing: check-in, baggage Relocated • North air cargo and general aviation Pacific • South gates and security screening Highway

Rental Car

Airport

Support TerminalITC / Public Parking Existing 09 Existing Taxiway C -27

Relocated Taxiway B 15 Gate Terminal

20 Gate Concourse

23 Gate Concourse Support

Non-secure People N Mover Not to Scale

15 Alternative A8

Ž Development Alternatives • New alternative resulting from independent peer review • New dedicated I-5 access roads from north • North Intermodal center, rental car facility, public parking • North air cargo and general aviation • South gates and passenger processing: check-in, security screening, baggage • South public parking

Airport Public Parking Existing Runway 09 Support Rental Car Airport Existing Taxiway C ITC Support -27

Relocated Taxiway B 61 Gate Terminal Public Parking

Dedicated Non-secure N Roadway People from I-5 Not to Scale Mover

16 Alternative B1

Ž Development Alternatives • North ground transportation access • North gates and passenger processing: check-in, security Relocated screening, baggage Pacific • South air cargo and general aviation Highway

ITC / 63 Gate ConcourseTerminal

Extended Taxiway C Land Public Parking Acquisition, 27 acres Existing Runway 09

Airport Rental -27 Support Car Existing Taxiway B Air Cargo General Aviation

N

Not to Scale

Note: Airfield B is presented for informational purposes only. The US Marine Corps letter of April 18, 2008 stated that MCRD property is a national defense resource and is not available to resolve airport land use issues. 17 Alternative B7

Ž Development Alternatives • North ground transportation access • North gates with passenger processing: check-in, security Relocated screening, baggage Pacific • North air cargo and general aviation Highway • South gates with passenger processing: check-in, security screening, baggage

Public Parking

Extended Taxiway C Rental Car Airport Land Support Acquisition, TerminalITC / 27 acres Existing Runway 09/27

Existing Taxiway B Airport 26 Gate Support Terminal 17-gate 15 Gate Concourse Concourse

Non-secure People N Mover Not to Scale

Note: Airfield B is presented for informational purposes only. The US Marine Corps letter of April 18, 2008 stated that MCRD property is a national defense resource and is not available to resolve airport land use issues. 18 Optional Arrangement - Alternative B1/E1

Ž Development Alternatives • Shifts Intermodal center more towards northwest • Reuses existing I-5 access ramps

ITC / Public Parking

Rental Car

Terminal

Concourse

N

Not to Scale

19 Alternative E1

Ž Development Alternatives • North ground transportation access • North gates and passenger processing: check-in, security Relocated screening, baggage Pacific • South air cargo and general aviation Highway

Public Parking

Terminal ITC 61 Gate Concourse Rental Car

Relocated Runway 09 Existing Taxiway C -27 New Taxiway

Airport Relocated Taxiway B Support Air Cargo General Aviation

N

Not to Scale

20 Alternative E7

Ž Development Alternatives • North ground transportation access • North gates with passenger processing: check-in, security Relocated screening, baggage Pacific • North air cargo and general aviation Highway • South gates with passenger processing: check-in, security screening, baggage

Public Parking

Rental Car

Airport Support

New Taxiway TerminalITC /

Relocated Runway 09 Existing Taxiway C

-27 Relocated Taxiway B

25 Gate Support 23-gate 12 Gate Concourse Concourse

Non-secure People N Mover Not to Scale

21 •

Conclusions and Next Steps

n Project schedule n Next steps

22 Schedule

• Conclusions and Next Steps

2008 2009 Task April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb 1. Vision Structure 2. Goal Setting/ Community Input A 3. Forecasting 4. Context and Opportunities 5. Community Input B 6. Intermodal Concept Development 7. Preliminary Vision 8. Community Input C 9. Final Vision and Concept Legend Time now Project Task Meeting Report

23 Next Steps

• Conclusions and Next Steps

n Further refine alternatives n Develop preliminary evaluation matrix n Initiate traffic analyses

24 Thank You!

n Questions n Comments n Discussion

25 Appendix

n Civic Engagement – Key Messages

26 Community Outreach/Civic Engagement

Jacobs Consultancy, with support from Michael Gallis & Associates, Porter Novelli, California Strategies and Strategic Communications, proposes to begin the civic engagement planned as part of the Destination Lindbergh project.

The initial phase will consist of one-on-one meetings with various community leaders from the following areas: • Economic development • Academia • Healthcare • Biotechnology • High technology/telecommunications • Tourism and hospitality • Environmental • Arts and culture

27 Civic Engagement – Key Messages

n A breakthrough alliance of the San Diego County Regional , City of San Diego and SANDAG (San Diego Association of Governments) is leading an Ad Hoc Policy Committee that includes the Port of San Diego, County of San Diego, Metropolitan Transit System, North County Transit District and U.S. Department of Defense • It is particularly important to note that the military is at the table in this process • Ultimately, a region-wide civic dialogue will be used to develop a visionary, implementable concept. • The plan will be built on consensus, bridging jurisdictional boundaries n The committee is steering an integrated process considering bold possibilities for San Diego at Lindbergh Field n The committee’s goal is to answer the question, “What is the ultimate build- out for Lindbergh?” as well as to minimize traffic impacts to adjacent communities and improve inter-modal access, while considering the airport as a potential regional transportation hub

28 Civic Engagement – Key Messages

n On August 2 the committee held a half-day workshop to delve into several different concepts, including: • Six concepts for the terminal and an inter-modal transit center layout • Six concepts for the airfield (runway and taxiways) layout • How those concepts could be combined into alternatives for further study n Several key issues emerged that now are being studied by the consultant team and worked through by the committee, including, but not limited to the following: • A full-length Taxiway C north of the runway • The location of passenger terminal(s) and gates • The potential upsides and downsides of an automated people mover • Phasing of construction of new facilities and removal of existing facilities • Improved access to I-5 and various forms of transit • Costs and funding options • Expectations regarding customer service n The ultimate plan will almost certainly be a compromise and will entail significant trade-offs that the committee will discuss with over the next six months n We plan to keep you informed of Destination Lindbergh’s progress and there is a web site if you wish to track the project in real-time: www.destinationlindbergh.com

29