Alternative A3
Ž Development Alternatives • North ground transportation access • North passenger processing: check-in, baggage • Optional south passenger processing: check-in, baggage Relocated • North air cargo and general aviation Pacific • South gates and security screening Highway
Rental Car
Airport
Support TerminalITC / Public Parking Existing Runway 09 Existing Taxiway C -27
Relocated Taxiway B 15 Gate Terminal
20 Gate Concourse
23 Gate Concourse Airport Support
Non-secure People N Mover Not to Scale
15 Alternative A8
Ž Development Alternatives • New alternative resulting from independent peer review • New dedicated I-5 access roads from north • North Intermodal center, rental car facility, public parking • North air cargo and general aviation • South gates and passenger processing: check-in, security screening, baggage • South public parking
Airport Public Parking Existing Runway 09 Support Rental Car Airport Existing Taxiway C ITC Support -27
Relocated Taxiway B 61 Gate Terminal Public Parking
Dedicated Non-secure N Roadway People from I-5 Not to Scale Mover
16 Alternative B1
Ž Development Alternatives • North ground transportation access • North gates and passenger processing: check-in, security Relocated screening, baggage Pacific • South air cargo and general aviation Highway
ITC / 63 Gate ConcourseTerminal
Extended Taxiway C Land Public Parking Acquisition, 27 acres Existing Runway 09
Airport Rental -27 Support Car Existing Taxiway B Air Cargo General Aviation
N
Not to Scale
Note: Airfield B is presented for informational purposes only. The US Marine Corps letter of April 18, 2008 stated that MCRD property is a national defense resource and is not available to resolve airport land use issues. 17 Alternative B7
Ž Development Alternatives • North ground transportation access • North gates with passenger processing: check-in, security Relocated screening, baggage Pacific • North air cargo and general aviation Highway • South gates with passenger processing: check-in, security screening, baggage
Public Parking
Extended Taxiway C Rental Car Airport Land Support Acquisition, TerminalITC / 27 acres Existing Runway 09/27
Existing Taxiway B Airport 26 Gate Support Terminal 17-gate 15 Gate Concourse Concourse
Non-secure People N Mover Not to Scale
Note: Airfield B is presented for informational purposes only. The US Marine Corps letter of April 18, 2008 stated that MCRD property is a national defense resource and is not available to resolve airport land use issues. 18 Optional Arrangement - Alternative B1/E1
Ž Development Alternatives • Shifts Intermodal center more towards northwest • Reuses existing I-5 access ramps
ITC / Public Parking
Rental Car
Terminal
Concourse
N
Not to Scale
19 Alternative E1
Ž Development Alternatives • North ground transportation access • North gates and passenger processing: check-in, security Relocated screening, baggage Pacific • South air cargo and general aviation Highway
Public Parking
Terminal ITC 61 Gate Concourse Rental Car
Relocated Runway 09 Existing Taxiway C -27 New Taxiway
Airport Relocated Taxiway B Support Air Cargo General Aviation
N
Not to Scale
20 Alternative E7
Ž Development Alternatives • North ground transportation access • North gates with passenger processing: check-in, security Relocated screening, baggage Pacific • North air cargo and general aviation Highway • South gates with passenger processing: check-in, security screening, baggage
Public Parking
Rental Car
Airport Support
New Taxiway TerminalITC /
Relocated Runway 09 Existing Taxiway C
-27 Relocated Taxiway B
25 Gate Airport Terminal Support 23-gate 12 Gate Concourse Concourse
Non-secure People N Mover Not to Scale
21 •
Conclusions and Next Steps
n Project schedule n Next steps
22 Schedule
• Conclusions and Next Steps
2008 2009 Task April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb 1. Vision Structure 2. Goal Setting/ Community Input A 3. Forecasting 4. Context and Opportunities 5. Community Input B 6. Intermodal Concept Development 7. Preliminary Vision 8. Community Input C 9. Final Vision and Concept Legend Time now Project Task Meeting Report
23 Next Steps
• Conclusions and Next Steps
n Further refine alternatives n Develop preliminary evaluation matrix n Initiate traffic analyses
24 Thank You!
n Questions n Comments n Discussion
25 Appendix
n Civic Engagement – Key Messages
26 Community Outreach/Civic Engagement
Jacobs Consultancy, with support from Michael Gallis & Associates, Porter Novelli, California Strategies and Strategic Communications, proposes to begin the civic engagement planned as part of the Destination Lindbergh project.
The initial phase will consist of one-on-one meetings with various community leaders from the following areas: • Economic development • Academia • Healthcare • Biotechnology • High technology/telecommunications • Tourism and hospitality • Environmental • Arts and culture
27 Civic Engagement – Key Messages
n A breakthrough alliance of the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority, City of San Diego and SANDAG (San Diego Association of Governments) is leading an Ad Hoc Policy Committee that includes the Port of San Diego, County of San Diego, Metropolitan Transit System, North County Transit District and U.S. Department of Defense • It is particularly important to note that the military is at the table in this process • Ultimately, a region-wide civic dialogue will be used to develop a visionary, implementable concept. • The plan will be built on consensus, bridging jurisdictional boundaries n The committee is steering an integrated process considering bold possibilities for San Diego International Airport at Lindbergh Field n The committee’s goal is to answer the question, “What is the ultimate build- out for Lindbergh?” as well as to minimize traffic impacts to adjacent communities and improve inter-modal access, while considering the airport as a potential regional transportation hub
28 Civic Engagement – Key Messages
n On August 2 the committee held a half-day workshop to delve into several different concepts, including: • Six concepts for the terminal and an inter-modal transit center layout • Six concepts for the airfield (runway and taxiways) layout • How those concepts could be combined into alternatives for further study n Several key issues emerged that now are being studied by the consultant team and worked through by the committee, including, but not limited to the following: • A full-length Taxiway C north of the runway • The location of passenger terminal(s) and gates • The potential upsides and downsides of an automated people mover • Phasing of construction of new facilities and removal of existing facilities • Improved access to I-5 and various forms of transit • Costs and funding options • Expectations regarding customer service n The ultimate plan will almost certainly be a compromise and will entail significant trade-offs that the committee will discuss with over the next six months n We plan to keep you informed of Destination Lindbergh’s progress and there is a web site if you wish to track the project in real-time: www.destinationlindbergh.com
29