OECD Guidelines for Managing Conflict of Interest in the Public Service Provide the First International Benchmark in This Field

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

OECD Guidelines for Managing Conflict of Interest in the Public Service Provide the First International Benchmark in This Field Managing Conflict of Interest in the Public Service Managing Conflict of Interest « Managing Conflict of Interest in the Managing Conflict Public Service of Interest in the OECD GUIDELINES AND COUNTRY EXPERIENCES Conflicts of interest have become a key issue in public debate world-wide. New forms of Public Service conflict between individual private interests of public officials and their public duties arise as the public sector has become increasingly commercialised and works more closely with the business and non-profit sectors. Governments need to ensure that public officials perform OECD GUIDELINES AND COUNTRY their duties in a fair and unbiased way. The pressure comes from a society and a business EXPERIENCES community that are increasingly well-informed, and specifically from a general demand for unbiased and transparent public decision-making. The message is clear: official decisions should not be improperly affected by self-interest, the integrity of markets and fair business competition should be supported, and corrupt practices excluded. The OECD Guidelines for Managing Conflict of Interest in the Public Service provide the first international benchmark in this field. They help governments review and modernise their conflict-of-interest policies in the public sector. The report highlights trends, approaches and models across OECD countries in a EXPERIENCES OECD GUIDELINES AND COUNTRY comparative overview that also presents examples of innovative and recent solutions. Selected country case studies give more details on the implementation of policies in national contexts and on key elements of legal and institutional frameworks. The countries covered are Australia, Canada, France, Germany, New Zealand, Poland, Portugal and the United States. OECD’s books, periodicals and statistical databases are now available via www.SourceOECD.org, our online library. This book is available to subscribers to the following SourceOECD theme: Governance Ask your librarian for more details on how to access OECD books online, or write to us at [email protected] www.oecd.org ISBN 92-64-10489-5 42 2004 02 1 P -:HSTCQE=VUY]^V: © OECD, 2003. © Software: 1987-1996, Acrobat is a trademark of ADOBE. All rights reserved. OECD grants you the right to use one copy of this Program for your personal use only. Unauthorised reproduction, lending, hiring, transmission or distribution of any data or software is prohibited. You must treat the Program and associated materials and any elements thereof like any other copyrighted material. All requests should be made to: Head of Publications Service, OECD Publications Service, 2, rue André-Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16, France. Managing Conflict of Interest in the Public Service OECD Guidelines and Overview ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT Pursuant to Article 1 of the Convention signed in Paris on 14th December 1960, and which came into force on 30th September 1961, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) shall promote policies designed: – to achieve the highest sustainable economic growth and employment and a rising standard of living in member countries, while maintaining financial stability, and thus to contribute to the development of the world economy; – to contribute to sound economic expansion in member as well as non-member countries in the process of economic development; and – to contribute to the expansion of world trade on a multilateral, non-discriminatory basis in accordance with international obligations. The original member countries of the OECD are Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The following countries became members subsequently through accession at the dates indicated hereafter: Japan (28th April 1964), Finland (28th January 1969), Australia (7th June 1971), New Zealand (29th May 1973), Mexico (18th May 1994), the Czech Republic (21st December 1995), Hungary (7th May 1996), Poland (22nd November 1996), Korea (12th December 1996) and the Slovak Republic (14th December 2000). The Commission of the European Communities takes part in the work of the OECD (Article 13 of the OECD Convention). Publié en français sous le titre : Gérer les conflits d’intérêt dans le service public Lignes directrices de l’OCDE et expériences nationales © OECD 2003 Permission to reproduce a portion of this work for non-commercial purposes or classroom use should be obtained through the Centre français d’exploitation du droit de copie (CFC), 20, rue des Grands-Augustins, 75006 Paris, France, tel. (33-1) 44 07 47 70, fax (33-1) 46 34 67 19, for every country except the United States. In the United States permission should be obtained through the Copyright Clearance Center, Customer Service, (508)750-8400, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923 USA, or CCC Online: www.copyright.com. All other applications for permission to reproduce or translate all or part of this book should be made to OECD Publications, 2, rue André-Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16, France. FOREWORD Foreword Ensuring that the integrity of official decision-making is not compromised by public officials' private interests is a growing public concern. To answer that concern, the OECD surveyed the policies and practices of member countries and developed practical instruments for governments to modernise their conflict-of-interest policies. Based on the experiences of all 30 OECD member countries, this report presents the OECD Guidelines for Managing Conflict of Interest, the first international benchmark for a comprehensive review. A comparative overview highlights trends, approaches and models across OECD countries. And case studies provide more details on policy approaches, the key elements of legal and institutional frameworks and how the policy is implemented. The countries covered are Australia, Canada, France, Germany, New Zealand, Poland, Portugal and the United States. The OECD Guidelines were developed in collaboration with the Expert Group on Conflicts of Interest under the chairmanship of Howard R. Wilson, Ethics Counsellor of the Government of Canada, and under the direction of the OECD Public Management Committee. The OECD Council endorsed the Guidelines in the form of a Council Recommendation in June 2003. The report was prepared by János Bertók of the OECD Public Governance and Territorial Development Directorate, who would like to thank Neda Mansouri for her preparatory work and Howard Whitton for his continuous advice in the drafting process. The report is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. MANAGING CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN THE PUBLIC SERVICE – ISBN 92-64-10489-5 – © OECD 2003 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents Preface . 11 Executive Summary . 13 Part I OECD Guidelines for Managing Conflict of Interest in the Public Service A. A growing public concern. 22 B. Managing conflict of interest . 23 C. Core principles for managing conflict of interest . 25 D. Developing the policy framework . 27 E. Implementing the policy framework . 31 F. Recommendation of the OECD Council on Guidelines for Managing Conflict of Interest in the Public Service . 38 Part II Managing Conflict of Interest. A Comparative Overview of OECD Countries A. Introduction . 40 B. Scope of the OECD survey . 41 C. Formal sources of conflict-of-interest policy. 45 D. Managing conflict of interest: Approach and definition . 53 E. Identifying and resolving conflicting situations . 62 F. Incompatibility: Restricting unavoidable, serious and pervasive conflicts . 66 G. The need for positive management . 70 H. Consequences of breaching the policy . 75 I. Putting policy into practice: Information, consultation and monitoring compliance. 78 J. Assessing policy implementation: Procedures and driving forces. 85 K. Emerging issues and new developments . 91 Notes. 95 Bibliography. 98 MANAGING CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN THE PUBLIC SERVICE – ISBN 92-64-10489-5 – © OECD 2003 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS Part III The Experiences of OECD Countries A Principle-Based Approach in Devolved Management: The Australian Experience by Andrew Podger, Public Service Commissioner and Mary Reid, Senior Policy Adviser, Australian Public Service Commission . 101 A. The Australian Public Service Values and Code of Conduct . 102 B. Role of the Australian Public Service Commission. 105 C. Application of the measures to manage conflicts of interest . 108 Notes. 109 Annex 1. Australian Public Service Values . 110 Annex 2. Australian Public Service Code of Conduct . 112 Annex 3. The Bowen Code . 114 Annex 4. Principles and procedures for business appointments . 116 Annex 5. Procedures to deal with conflict of interest in market testing and outsourcing situations . 119 Annex 6. Criminal provisions. 121 Annex 7. Department of health and ageing policy on managing conflict of interest in committees. 123 Principles and Prevention: Meeting Canadians’ Expectations of Ethical Behaviour in Public Life by Howard Wilson, Ethics Counsellor, Government of Canada . 127 A. Summary . 128 B. Developing a modern framework for ethics issues in the Government of Canada . 128 C. The roles and responsibilities of the Office of the Ethics Counsellor . 137 D. Conclusion – A continually rising standard. 145 Notes. 146 Bibliography. 146 Prevention Through Updated Regulations and Sanctions: The French Experience by Emmanuelle Prada-Bordenave,
Recommended publications
  • Nigeria's Constitution of 1999
    PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:42 constituteproject.org Nigeria's Constitution of 1999 This complete constitution has been generated from excerpts of texts from the repository of the Comparative Constitutions Project, and distributed on constituteproject.org. constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:42 Table of contents Preamble . 5 Chapter I: General Provisions . 5 Part I: Federal Republic of Nigeria . 5 Part II: Powers of the Federal Republic of Nigeria . 6 Chapter II: Fundamental Objectives and Directive Principles of State Policy . 13 Chapter III: Citizenship . 17 Chapter IV: Fundamental Rights . 20 Chapter V: The Legislature . 28 Part I: National Assembly . 28 A. Composition and Staff of National Assembly . 28 B. Procedure for Summoning and Dissolution of National Assembly . 29 C. Qualifications for Membership of National Assembly and Right of Attendance . 32 D. Elections to National Assembly . 35 E. Powers and Control over Public Funds . 36 Part II: House of Assembly of a State . 40 A. Composition and Staff of House of Assembly . 40 B. Procedure for Summoning and Dissolution of House of Assembly . 41 C. Qualification for Membership of House of Assembly and Right of Attendance . 43 D. Elections to a House of Assembly . 45 E. Powers and Control over Public Funds . 47 Chapter VI: The Executive . 50 Part I: Federal Executive . 50 A. The President of the Federation . 50 B. Establishment of Certain Federal Executive Bodies . 58 C. Public Revenue . 61 D. The Public Service of the Federation . 63 Part II: State Executive . 65 A. Governor of a State . 65 B. Establishment of Certain State Executive Bodies .
    [Show full text]
  • The Governor Genera. and the Head of State Functions
    The Governor Genera. and the Head of State Functions THOMAS FRANCK* Lincoln, Nebraska In most, though by no means all democratic states,' the "Head o£ State" is a convenient legal and political fiction the purpose of which is to personify the complex political functions of govern- ment. What distinguishes the operations of this fiction in Canada is the fact that the functions of head of state are not discharged by any one person. Some, by legislative enactment, are vested in the Governor General. Others are delegated to the Governor General by the Crown. Still others are exercised by the Queen in person. A survey of these functions will reveal, however, that many more of the duties of the Canadian head of state are to-day dis- charged by the Governor General than are performed by the Queen. Indeed, it will reveal that some of the functions cannot be dis- charged by anyone else. It is essential that we become aware of this development in Canadian constitutional practice and take legal cognizance of the consequently increasing stature and importance of the Queen's representative in Canada. Formal Vesting of Head of State Functions in Constitutional Governments ofthe Commonnealth Reahns In most of the realms of the Commonwealth, the basic constitut- ional documents formally vest executive power in the Queen. Section 9 of the British North America Act, 1867,2 states: "The Executive Government and authority of and over Canada is hereby declared to continue and be vested in the Queen", while section 17 establishes that "There shall be one Parliament for Canada, consist- ing of the Queen, an Upper House, styled the Senate, and the *Thomas Franck, B.A., LL.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Choices in Reforming Public Service Employment an International Handbook
    Strategic Choices in Reforming Public Service Employment An International Handbook Edited by Carlo Dell’Aringa, Guiseppe Della Rocca and Berndt Keller dell'aringa/96590/crc 16/7/01 12:44 pm Page 1 Strategic Choices in Reforming Public Service Employment dell'aringa/96590/crc 16/7/01 12:44 pm Page 2 dell'aringa/96590/crc 16/7/01 12:44 pm Page 3 Strategic Choices in Reforming Public Service Employment An International Handbook Edited by Carlo Dell’Aringa Giuseppe Della Rocca and Berndt Keller dell'aringa/96590/crc 16/7/01 12:44 pm Page 4 Editorial matter and selection © Carlo Dell’Aringa, Giuseppe Della Rocca and Berndt Keller 2001 Chapters 1–9 © Palgrave Publishers Ltd 2001 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 4LP. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The authors have asserted their rights to be identified as the authors of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2001 by PALGRAVE Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS and 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N. Y. 10010 Companies and representatives throughout the world PALGRAVE is the new global academic imprint of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Analysis Sub. H.B
    Final Analysis William Cramer Legislative Service Commission Sub. H.B. 187 126th General Assembly (As Passed by the General Assembly) Reps. Buehrer, Uecker, Hagan, Gilb, Martin, D. Evans, Aslanides, Seaver, Schaffer, Daniels, Combs, Wagner, Blasdel, Blessing, Bubp, Calvert, Collier, Core, Dolan, Faber, Flowers, Gibbs, Hood, Law, Peterson, Raga, Raussen, Reidelbach, Reinhard, Schneider, Seitz, Setzer, Wagoner, Webster, D. White, J. White, Wolpert Sens. Wachtmann, Cates, Stivers, Niehaus Effective date: March 30, 2007; Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 effective July 1, 2007 ACT SUMMARY · Implements recommendations of the Civil Service Review Commission and makes other changes to the civil service laws, including changes to the statutory provisions concerning workforce reductions, employee discipline, employee categories, classification, compensation and benefits, hiring and promotions, and appeals and due process. TABLE OF CONTENTS Background .......................................................................................................................3 Overview of the act ..........................................................................................................3 Workforce reduction........................................................................................................3 Layoffs...........................................................................................................................3 Displacement privileges ..............................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • THE DECLINE of MINISTERIAL ACCOUNTABILITY in CANADA by M. KATHLEEN Mcleod Integrated Studies Project Submitted to Dr.Gloria
    THE DECLINE OF MINISTERIAL ACCOUNTABILITY IN CANADA By M. KATHLEEN McLEOD Integrated Studies Project submitted to Dr.Gloria Filax in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts – Integrated Studies Athabasca, Alberta Submitted April 17, 2011 Table of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................................. ii Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 The Westminster System of Democratic Government ................................................................... 3 Ministerial Accountability: All the Time, or Only When it is Convenient? ................................... 9 The Richard Colvin Case .................................................................................................................. 18 The Over-Arching Power of the Prime Minister ............................................................................ 24 Michel Foucault and Governmentality ............................................................................................ 31 Governmentality .......................................................................................................................... 31 Governmentality and Stephen Harper ............................................................................................ 34 Munir Sheikh and the Long Form Census .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Actuarial Report on the Pension Plan for the Public Service of Canada (PSPP) Was Made Pursuant to the Public Pensions Reporting Act (PPRA)
    ACTUARIAL REPORT on the Pension Plan for the PUBLIC SERVICE OF CANADA as at 31 March 2017 Office of the Chief Actuary Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Canada 12th Floor, Kent Square Building 255 Albert Street Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H2 Facsimile: 613-990-9900 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: www.osfi-bsif.gc.ca © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2018 Cat. No. IN3-16/10E-PDF ISSN 1701-8269 ACTUARIAL REPORT Pension Plan for the PUBLIC SERVICE OF CANADA as at 31 March 2017 7 September 2018 The Honourable Scott Brison, P.C., M.P. President of the Treasury Board Ottawa, Canada K1A 0R5 Dear Minister: Pursuant to Section 6 of the Public Pensions Reporting Act, I am pleased to submit the report on the actuarial review as at 31 March 2017 of the pension plan for the Public Service of Canada. This actuarial review is in respect of pension benefits and contributions which are defined by Parts I, III and IV of the Public Service Superannuation Act, the Special Retirement Arrangements Act and the Pension Benefits Division Act. Yours sincerely, Jean-Claude Ménard, F.S.A., F.C.I.A. Chief Actuary Office of the Chief Actuary ACTUARIAL REPORT Pension Plan for the PUBLIC SERVICE OF CANADA as at 31 March 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... 7 A. Purpose of Actuarial Report ............................................................................................. 7 B. Valuation Basis ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Members' Allowances and Services Manual
    MEMBERS’ ALLOWANCES AND SERVICES Table of Contents 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1-1 2. Governance and Principles ....................................................................................... 2-1 1. Introduction ................................................................................................. 2-2 2. Governing Principles .................................................................................... 2-2 3. Governance Structure .................................................................................. 2-6 4. House Administration .................................................................................. 2-7 3. Members’ Salary and Benefits .................................................................................. 3-1 1. Introduction ................................................................................................. 3-2 2. Members’ Salary .......................................................................................... 3-2 3. Insurance Plans ............................................................................................ 3-3 4. Pension ........................................................................................................ 3-5 5. Relocation .................................................................................................... 3-6 6. Employee and Family Assistance Program .................................................. 3-8 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2007-08
    THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Civil Service Commission Annual Report Annual Report Fiscal Year 2006–07 Fiscal Year 2007–08 1 THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCIscO 2 Civil Service Commission Civil Service Commission Commission Staff Donald A. Casper Anita Sanchez PRESIDENT (ELEctED JUNE 2, 2008) EXECUTIVE OFFICER Morgan R. Gorrono Sandra Eng VICE PRESIDENT AssIstANT EXECUTIVE OFFICER Alicia D. Becerril Luz Morganti COmmISSIONER SENIOR PERSONNEL ANALYst Mary Y. Jung Elizabeth Aldana COmmISSIONER ADMINISTRATIVE AssISTANT Yu-Yee Wu Sheridan Lizzette Henríquez COmmISSIONER RULES, PERSONNEL & OFFICE COORDINATOR Gloria Sheppard AppEALS COORDINATOR Annual Report Fiscal Year 2007–08 3 THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCIscO 4 Civil Service Commission Table of Contents Mission and Vision ................................................................................................................................................................................................................7 Highlights of Fiscal Year 2007-08 ..................................................................................................................................................................................8 The Commission Members ...........................................................................................................................................................................................10 Membership ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • JC-0529 Chair, Intergovernmental Relations Comrnittee Texas State Senate Re: Whether a County Civil-Service Commission P-0
    ) OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL . STATE OF TEXAS JOHN CORNYN July 9,2002 The Honorable Frank Madla Opinion No. JC-0529 Chair, Intergovernmental Relations Comrnittee Texas State Senate Re: Whether a county civil-service commission P-0. Box 12068 or a sheriffs department civil-service commission Austin, Texas 78711 may adopt a rule that permits an award of back pay to an employee after the commission modifies a disciplinary action taken against that employee (RQ-0504-JC) Dear Senator Madla: Section 158.009 of the Local Government Code requires a county civil-service commission formed under chapter 158, subchapter A to adopt rules regarding, among other things, county employees ’ “substantive rights, . benefits, and working conditions.” TEX. Lot. GOV’T CODE ANN. 8 158.009(a)(S) (V emon 1999). Section 158.035 similarly requires a sheriffs department civil- service commission formed under chapter 15 8, subchapter B to adopt rules regarding, among other things, employees ’ “substantive rights, . benefits, and working conditions.” Id. fj 158.035(a)(X). You ask whether a civil-service commission formed under either chapter 158, subchapter A or subchapter B has sufficient authority to adopt a rule that “permits awarding back pay to an employee after the Commission modifies a disciplinary action taken against” the employee, “where such modification results in either a full or partial restoration of that employee’s position.“’ We conclude that a civil-service commission’s statutory rule-making authority includes authority to adopt such a rule under either subchapter A or B. Chapter 158 of the Local Government Code is divided into two subchapters, A and B.
    [Show full text]
  • Representative Bureaucracy ?
    Representative Bureaucracy ? Employment Equity in the Public Service of Canada Carol Agocs Department of Political Science, Western University [email protected] Paper presented at the 2012 Annual Conference of the Canadian Political Science Association, Edmonton, June 13-15. Please do not cite or quote without author’s permission. 1 Representative Bureaucracy? Employment Equity in the Public Service of Canada Carol Agocs Department of Political Science, Western University A representative bureaucracy is essential to democratic governance in a diverse society, and it is the responsibility of government to be a model employer that exemplifies progressive human resource management practices. Canada’s employment equity policy has been in force in the federal sector for a quarter century, and one of its primary purposes is to develop a public service that is representative of Canada’s population. Has employment equity delivered on its potential to create a representative bureaucracy? An overview of the Canadian experience with employment equity in the federal public service reveals some advances for women, “visible minorities,”1 Aboriginal people and persons with disabilities. Yet patterns of under-representation and inequality persist for each of the equity groups, notably for visible minorities, and the Government of Canada has yet to truly become a model employer. Canada’s labour market is increasingly diverse, suggesting both the need and the possibility of a more diverse public service for the future.2 This paper explores the degree to which employment equity policy has assisted the Public Service of Canada to become a representative bureaucracy. A representative bureaucracy may be defined as a public service whose members reflect the demographic composition of the population it serves, and to which its policies apply.
    [Show full text]
  • Open PDF File, 267.02 KB, for Godere, Jeffrey V. City of Chicopee 2/13/20
    COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION One Ashburton Place, Room 503 Boston, MA 02108 JEFFREY GODERE, Appellant v. D1-18-217 CITY OF CHICOPEE, Respondent Appearance for Appellant: Andrew J. Gambaccini, Esq. Reardon, Joyce & Akerson, P.C. 4 Lancaster Terrace Worcester, MA 01609 Appearance for Respondent: Thomas J. Rooke, Esq. City of Chicopee Law Department 17 Springfield Street Chicopee, MA 01013 Commissioner: Christopher C. Bowman DECISION On November 8, 2018, the Appellant, Jeffrey Godere (Sgt. Godere), pursuant to the provisions of G.L. c. 31, § 43, filed an appeal with the Civil Service Commission (Commission) contesting the decision of the Respondent, the City of Chicopee (City) to terminate his employment as a police sergeant. I held a pre-hearing conference at the Springfield State Building in Springfield, MA on November 28, 2018. I held a full hearing at the same location on February 27, 2019 and March 13, 2019.1 On March 14, 2019, a conference call was held to take additional testimony. At the request of Sgt. Godere, the proceedings were declared public. Three 1 The Standard Adjudicatory Rules of Practice and Procedure; 801 CMR §§ 1.00 et. seq.; apply to adjudications before the Commission, with G.L. c. 31, or any Commission rules, taking precedence. 1 (3) CDs were made of the hearing, including the conference call.2 Both parties submitted proposed decisions to the Commission. FINDINGS OF FACT: Based upon the documents entered into evidence (Respondent Exhibits 1-21 and Appellant Exhibits 1-15), stipulated facts, the testimony of: Called by the City: . William Jebb, Chicopee Police Chief; .
    [Show full text]
  • Manual of Procedure in Disciplinary Actions
    New York State Department of Civil Service Committed to Innovation, Quality and Excellence Manual of Procedure in Disciplinary Actions Andrew M. Cuomo Governor Disclaimer This manual is intended to be used as a practical and informative guide only and is not to be used as legal authority for any purpose. Specific legal authority comes exclusively from statute and case law and we reserve the right to revise, modify or alter the contents of this manual at any time. Copyright © 2003 by the New York State Department of Civil Service Manual of Procedure in Disciplinary Actions TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page PREFACE I 1 PURPOSE OF MANUAL II 2 STATUTORY OVERVIEW III 3 OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES COVERED BY SECTION 75 IV 5 General Temporary, Provisional, Part-time or Per Diem Employees Probation Private Secretary, Cashier, Deputy Independent Officers Notice of Status as War Veteran or Exempt Volunteer Firefighter PROCEDURE BEFORE DISCIPLINARY ACTION IS TAKEN V 11 Fair Play-Due Process General Policies Records Showing Incompetency or Misconduct E-Mail Conferences and Counseling Assignment to Other Locations/Duties Investigation Representation During Investigation Criminal Acts or Omissions Medical Examination OFFENSES SUBJECT TO DISCIPLINARY ACTION VI 22 Time Limitations Offense Must Be Substantial Effect of Layoff “Outside” or “Off Duty” Offenses Indictment and Conviction on Criminal Charges Retaliatory Action PREPARATION OF CHARGES VII 26 Form Charge Specifications Related Matters SUSPENSION VIII 32 TRANSMITTAL OF NOTICE AND STATEMENT OF CHARGES
    [Show full text]