Henry Taube Concept of Ligand Substitution Reactions of Co

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Henry Taube Concept of Ligand Substitution Reactions of Co

Liebig condenser benzilic acid rearrangement (1838) Carl Schmidt Arthur J. von Oettingen * Linus Pauling (Giessen, 1844) (Dorpat, 1865) Pauling electronegativity scale (1932); hybridization concept in chemical bonding (1948); structure LIEBIG TREE #2 c Dr. John Andraos, 2002 of alpha helix in proteins (1951); Ostwald dilution law (1888) co-ordination theory of crystal structures; concept of catalysis (1894) Corey-Pauling-Koltun space filling rates of chemical reactions; chemical equilibrium models (1959) Chemistry Nobel 1909 Geiger-Muller Fritz Pregl Jan S. Sterba-Boehm Robert T.D. Luther tube, threshold Arthur A. Noyes Walden inversion rule (1893) John L.R. Morgan Development of (Prague, 1903) (Leipzig, 1896) (1909) (Leipzig, 1890) (Leipzig, 1895) microanalysis methods Chemistry Nobel Jaroslav Heyrovsky William C. Bray Charles D. Coryell Roscoe G. Dickinson Badger's rules Ward V. Evans 1923 Invention of polarography (Leipzig, 1905) Jacob A. Marinsky (Cal Tech, 1920) and equation (1934) (Columbia, 1916) Chemistry Nobel 1959 discovery of element Victor Henri 61, promethium enzyme kinetics (1903) Henry Taube Beckman pH meter Pearson's HSAB (1945) Linus Pauling principle (1963) concept of ligand (1935) * Chemistry Nobel 1954 substitution reactions Peace Nobel 1962 of co-ordination complexes (1952) Chemistry Nobel 1983 Karplus equation William N. Lipscomb, Jr. Lawrence O. Brockway Daniel C. Gajdusek Edgar B.Wilson, Jr. (1959) Structure of boranes (Cal Tech, 1933) Discovery of new mechanisms (Cal Tech, 1933) Creutz-Taube Leonard S. Lerman Chemistry Nobel 1976 for origin and dissemination of complex ion (1969) (Cal Tech, 1950) infectious diseases Jerome Karle Physiology & Medicine ? Woodward-Hoffman Herbert A. Hauptman Nobel 1976 Dudley H. Herschbach Charles H. Townes Sidney Altman rules (1965); concept of Development of direct Collision dynamics of elementary Quantum electronics, maser-laser principle Discovery of catalytic conservation of orbital methods for determination chemical reactions Physics Nobel 1964 properties of t-RNA (1971) symmetry of crystal structures Chemistry Nobel 1986 Chemistry Nobel 1989 Chemistry Nobel 1981 Chemistry Nobel 1985 Theodor W. Haensch Arthur L. Schawlow Arno A. Penzias (Heidelberg, 1969; Stanford) Development of laser Discovery of cosmic Physics Nobel 2005 spectroscopy microwave background Physics Nobel 1981 Physics Nobel 1978.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Nobel Laureates Endorse Joe Biden
Nobel Laureates endorse Joe Biden 81 American Nobel Laureates in Physics, Chemistry, and Medicine have signed this letter to express their support for former Vice President Joe Biden in the 2020 election for President of the United States. At no time in our nation’s history has there been a greater need for our leaders to appreciate the value of science in formulating public policy. During his long record of public service, Joe Biden has consistently demonstrated his willingness to listen to experts, his understanding of the value of international collaboration in research, and his respect for the contribution that immigrants make to the intellectual life of our country. As American citizens and as scientists, we wholeheartedly endorse Joe Biden for President. Name Category Prize Year Peter Agre Chemistry 2003 Sidney Altman Chemistry 1989 Frances H. Arnold Chemistry 2018 Paul Berg Chemistry 1980 Thomas R. Cech Chemistry 1989 Martin Chalfie Chemistry 2008 Elias James Corey Chemistry 1990 Joachim Frank Chemistry 2017 Walter Gilbert Chemistry 1980 John B. Goodenough Chemistry 2019 Alan Heeger Chemistry 2000 Dudley R. Herschbach Chemistry 1986 Roald Hoffmann Chemistry 1981 Brian K. Kobilka Chemistry 2012 Roger D. Kornberg Chemistry 2006 Robert J. Lefkowitz Chemistry 2012 Roderick MacKinnon Chemistry 2003 Paul L. Modrich Chemistry 2015 William E. Moerner Chemistry 2014 Mario J. Molina Chemistry 1995 Richard R. Schrock Chemistry 2005 K. Barry Sharpless Chemistry 2001 Sir James Fraser Stoddart Chemistry 2016 M. Stanley Whittingham Chemistry 2019 James P. Allison Medicine 2018 Richard Axel Medicine 2004 David Baltimore Medicine 1975 J. Michael Bishop Medicine 1989 Elizabeth H. Blackburn Medicine 2009 Michael S.
[Show full text]
Chemistry News
Fall 2015 Chemistry News Filling the Chemical Sciences Pipeline Future chemists are being recruited by the Department of Chemistry at every age from grade school children to postdoctoral scholars. Hands-on activities encourage girls to learn and explore their potential in science, technology, math and engineering. FEMMES, a UM student organization, organizes events for 4th-6th grade girls on campus and in afterschool programs. Chemistry faculty organized lab tours for students students newly admitted to the University of Michigan in the Summer Bridge program. afety glasses and gloves in place, Johana and a dozen other fourth grade Sgirls used pipettes to drip a creamy mixture into cups of liquid nitrogen, watching the drops freeze instantly into an ice cream treat. After the graduate students strained the tasty dots out of the cup, the girls were able to eat the Cass Technical High School students spent the summer doing result of their experiment. research as part of the UM Detroit Research Internship These girls were attending an all-day event at the UM Chemistry build- Summer Experience, D-RISE. They participated alongside the ing organized by FEMMES, Females Excelling More in Math, Engineering, UM graduate students in the Karle Symposium. and the Sciences. FEMMES aims to inspire young girls, encouraging them to consider their potential in science and math. Each event features hands-on activities led by volunteers. Chemistry’s undergraduates, graduate students, and faculty are very active in the Michigan chapter of FEMMES. On a recent Saturday, FEMMES brought 300 girls to campus from Detroit and area schools to participate in twenty different activities.
[Show full text]
Annual Report 2013.Pdf
ATOMIC HERITAGE FOUNDATION Preserving & Interpreting Manhattan Project History & Legacy preserving history ANNUAL REPORT 2013 WHY WE SHOULD PRESERVE THE MANHATTAN PROJECT “The factories and bombs that Manhattan Project scientists, engineers, and workers built were physical objects that depended for their operation on physics, chemistry, metallurgy, and other nat- ural sciences, but their social reality - their meaning, if you will - was human, social, political....We preserve what we value of the physical past because it specifically embodies our social past....When we lose parts of our physical past, we lose parts of our common social past as well.” “The new knowledge of nuclear energy has undoubtedly limited national sovereignty and scaled down the destructiveness of war. If that’s not a good enough reason to work for and contribute to the Manhattan Project’s historic preservation, what would be? It’s certainly good enough for me.” ~Richard Rhodes, “Why We Should Preserve the Manhattan Project,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, May/June 2006 Photographs clockwise from top: J. Robert Oppenheimer, General Leslie R. Groves pinning an award on Enrico Fermi, Leona Woods Marshall, the Alpha Racetrack at the Y-12 Plant, and the Bethe House on Bathtub Row. Front cover: A Bruggeman Ranch property. Back cover: Bronze statues by Susanne Vertel of J. Robert Oppenheimer and General Leslie Groves at Los Alamos. Table of Contents BOARD MEMBERS & ADVISORY COMMITTEE........3 Cindy Kelly, Dorothy and Clay Per- Letter from the President..........................................4
[Show full text]
Peptide Chemistry up to Its Present State
Appendix In this Appendix biographical sketches are compiled of many scientists who have made notable contributions to the development of peptide chemistry up to its present state. We have tried to consider names mainly connected with important events during the earlier periods of peptide history, but could not include all authors mentioned in the text of this book. This is particularly true for the more recent decades when the number of peptide chemists and biologists increased to such an extent that their enumeration would have gone beyond the scope of this Appendix. 250 Appendix Plate 8. Emil Abderhalden (1877-1950), Photo Plate 9. S. Akabori Leopoldina, Halle J Plate 10. Ernst Bayer Plate 11. Karel Blaha (1926-1988) Appendix 251 Plate 12. Max Brenner Plate 13. Hans Brockmann (1903-1988) Plate 14. Victor Bruckner (1900- 1980) Plate 15. Pehr V. Edman (1916- 1977) 252 Appendix Plate 16. Lyman C. Craig (1906-1974) Plate 17. Vittorio Erspamer Plate 18. Joseph S. Fruton, Biochemist and Historian Appendix 253 Plate 19. Rolf Geiger (1923-1988) Plate 20. Wolfgang Konig Plate 21. Dorothy Hodgkins Plate. 22. Franz Hofmeister (1850-1922), (Fischer, biograph. Lexikon) 254 Appendix Plate 23. The picture shows the late Professor 1.E. Jorpes (r.j and Professor V. Mutt during their favorite pastime in the archipelago on the Baltic near Stockholm Plate 24. Ephraim Katchalski (Katzir) Plate 25. Abraham Patchornik Appendix 255 Plate 26. P.G. Katsoyannis Plate 27. George W. Kenner (1922-1978) Plate 28. Edger Lederer (1908- 1988) Plate 29. Hennann Leuchs (1879-1945) 256 Appendix Plate 30. Choh Hao Li (1913-1987) Plate 31.
[Show full text]
Date: To: September 22, 1 997 Mr Ian Johnston©
22-SEP-1997 16:36 NOBELSTIFTELSEN 4& 8 6603847 SID 01 NOBELSTIFTELSEN The Nobel Foundation TELEFAX Date: September 22, 1 997 To: Mr Ian Johnston© Company: Executive Office of the Secretary-General Fax no: 0091-2129633511 From: The Nobel Foundation Total number of pages: olO MESSAGE DearMrJohnstone, With reference to your fax and to our telephone conversation, I am enclosing the address list of all Nobel Prize laureates. Yours sincerely, Ingr BergstrSm Mailing address: Bos StU S-102 45 Stockholm. Sweden Strat itddrtSMi Suircfatan 14 Teleptelrtts: (-MB S) 663 » 20 Fsuc (*-«>!) «W Jg 47 22-SEP-1997 16:36 NOBELSTIFTELSEN 46 B S603847 SID 02 22-SEP-1997 16:35 NOBELSTIFTELSEN 46 8 6603847 SID 03 Professor Willis E, Lamb Jr Prof. Aleksandre M. Prokhorov Dr. Leo EsaJki 848 North Norris Avenue Russian Academy of Sciences University of Tsukuba TUCSON, AZ 857 19 Leninskii Prospect 14 Tsukuba USA MSOCOWV71 Ibaraki Ru s s I a 305 Japan 59* c>io Dr. Tsung Dao Lee Professor Hans A. Bethe Professor Antony Hewlsh Department of Physics Cornell University Cavendish Laboratory Columbia University ITHACA, NY 14853 University of Cambridge 538 West I20th Street USA CAMBRIDGE CB3 OHE NEW YORK, NY 10027 England USA S96 014 S ' Dr. Chen Ning Yang Professor Murray Gell-Mann ^ Professor Aage Bohr The Institute for Department of Physics Niels Bohr Institutet Theoretical Physics California Institute of Technology Blegdamsvej 17 State University of New York PASADENA, CA91125 DK-2100 KOPENHAMN 0 STONY BROOK, NY 11794 USA D anni ark USA 595 600 613 Professor Owen Chamberlain Professor Louis Neel ' Professor Ben Mottelson 6068 Margarldo Drive Membre de rinstitute Nordita OAKLAND, CA 946 IS 15 Rue Marcel-Allegot Blegdamsvej 17 USA F-92190 MEUDON-BELLEVUE DK-2100 KOPENHAMN 0 Frankrike D an m ar k 599 615 Professor Donald A.
[Show full text]
ACA Structure Matters, Winter 2017
ACA Isabella Karle (1921-2017) Winter 2017 Structure Matters Remembering Isabella Karle “I need to tackle this scientific problem, what techniques are Isabella Karle (1921 - 2017), retired from the Naval Research available to help me do it?” and when she found out what they Laboratory (Washington, DC) after more than six decades there, were she would solve the problem. In this case she worked with passed away on October 3, 2017, at the age of 95, from a brain silica tubes that she had made, filled with crude plutonium oxide tumor. Early on Isabella was told by a teacher that chemistry and chemical reactants, and inserted them in a hole in a large was not a “proper field for girls” but she went on to become a block of copper that was heated to high temperatures of 800 to member of the National Academy of Sciences. She received the 900 degrees Centigrade. After many experiments under difficult 1988 Gregori Aminoff Prize from the Royal Swedish Academy conditions, she ended up, triumphantly, with bright green crystals of plutonium chloride (PuCl ) that she passed on to the physics of Sciences, the 1993 Bower Award and Prize for Achievement 3 in Science and, in 1995, received the National Medal of Science. branch of the Manhattan project. What follows are remembrances from several of her colleagues. Isabella approached direct methods in the same way, to the delight of her husband Jerry, who won the Nobel Prize for his work on them. She worked hard to find how to run direct methods correctly and then was able to help others.
[Show full text]
The Protein That Wasn't There: the Discovery of Ribozymes
The Protein that Wasn't There: The Discovery of Ribozymes Introduction If we were challenged to describe, in layman's terms, what makes living matter different from non-living matter, I suspect that many of us would focus on nucleic acids. Their ability to encode information, to replicate, and their passage from one generation to the next is part and parcel of what makes life special. Ironically, if one examines an organism carefully and observes what makes it "alive," nucleic acids turn out to have very little direct effect on living matter. Whether an animal moves, breathes, digests, turns its head to look, or just blinks an eye, its actions depend far more on enzymes than they do on DNA. Enzymes in muscle produce movement, in nerve cells they open membrane channels that produce message-carrying impulses, throughout the body enzymes produce, store, and convert chemical energy from one form to another. Enzymes are biological catalysts. Enzymes, which lower the activation energies of chemical reaction, are responsible for just about every activity that we associate with living things. Indeed, enzymes even control the synthesis, replication, folding, and activation of DNA itself. What kinds of molecules are there marvelous enzymes? They are proteins, of course. Look at any biology text, high school or college (including pp. 74-76 of Biology by Miller and Levine), and you will find that they devote a generous amount of space (and lots of pictures) to the structure of proteins. They are loaded with terms like a- helix, b- sheet, prosthetic group, secondary structure, and so forth.
[Show full text]
SCIENCE HISTORY INSTITUTE ISABELLA KARLE and JEROME
SCIENCE HISTORY INSTITUTE ISABELLA KARLE and JEROME KARLE Transcript of an Interview Conducted by James J. Bohning and David K. Van Keuren at Naval Research Laboratory Washington, District of Columbia on 26 February, 15 June and 9 September 1987 (With Subsequent Corrections and Additions) Upon Isabella Karle’s death in 2017, this oral history was designated Free Access. Please note: This oral history is protected by U.S. copyright law and shall not be reproduced or disseminated in any way without the express permission of the Science History Institute. Users citing this interview for purposes of publication are obliged under the terms of the Center for Oral History, Science History Institute, to credit the Science History Institute using the format below: Isabella Karle and Jerome Karle, interview by James J. Bohning and David K. Van Keuren at Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, District of Columbia, 26 February, 15 June and 9 September 1987 (Philadelphia: Science History Institute, Oral History Transcript # 0066). Formed by the merger of the Chemical Heritage Foundation and the Life Sciences Foundation, the Science History Institute collects and shares the stories of innovators and of discoveries that shape our lives. We preserve and interpret the history of chemistry, chemical engineering, and the life sciences. Headquartered in Philadelphia, with offices in California and Europe, the Institute houses an archive and a library for historians and researchers, a fellowship program for visiting scholars from around the globe, a community of researchers who examine historical and contemporary issues, and an acclaimed museum that is free and open to the public. For more information visit sciencehistory.org.
[Show full text]
PDF File, 2.06 MB
Introduction Have you ever seen those little About the International Year of Crystallography pictures of a molecule of your The United Nations declares 2014 as the official International Year of prescribed medication? …or a drawing Crystallography. It commemorates not only the centennial of X-ray of DNA showing two strands winding Amoxicillin diffraction, which allowed the detailed study of crystalline material, but also the 400th anniversary of Kepler’s observation in 1611 of the What do around each other? symmetrical form of ice crystals, which began the wider study of the role Molecules are too small to be seen by of symmetry in matter. New Drug Design, normal microscopy. Learn more at http://iycr2014.org X-ray crystallography is one of the DNA Studies few techniques that can visualize them About IUCr The International Union of Crystallography is a not-for- and was used to determine the first Schematic picture profit, scientific organization that aims to: and molecular structures ever known. of DNA • promote international cooperation in crystallography • contribute to all aspects of crystallography X-rays X-rays & X-ray Crystallography • promote international publication of crystallographic research have in common? How They Work • facilitate standardization of methods, units, nomenclatures and symbols • form a focus for the relations of crystallography to other sciences • X-ray beams are shot through • We calculate how the diffracted a crystal composed of the X-rays would look, if they The IUCr fulfils these objectives by publishing
[Show full text]
FALL2013.Pdf
SC-XRD_ACA_PrintFP_D8 Quest ECO_Sep 2013 Print.pdf 1 9/3/13 1:22 PM American Crystallographic Association Cover: The cover image, from Omar Farha and Chris Wilmer, Northwestern University, depicts the metal-organic ACA RefleXions framework (MOF), of NU-111. Fall, 2013 See On the Cover, p 3. ACA HOME PAGE: www.AmerCrystalAssn.org Table of Contents 3 President’s Column, On the Cover, Sad News about Dave Rognlie The New D8 QUEST ECO 4 Letter to the Editor, Council Highlights, ACA RefleXions Co-Editors & Staff, Errata Crystallography with a Conscience 6 News & Awards 9 Introducing new staff member Chiara Pastore, 2013 Class of ACA Fellows 10 Contributors to this Issue 13 Net RefleXions, Index of Advertisers 15 Jerome Karle (1918 - 2013) 18 Ray Davis (1938 - 2013) C 20 Charles Norris Caughlan (1915 - 2013), Student Help in Hawaii M Y 21 Poster Prizes in Hawaii CM 24 Accompanying Members MY 25 Annual ACA Meeting in Hawaii CY 64 High School Outreach in Hawaii CMY 65 Books K 66 Workshop on Dynamic Structural Photocrystallography 67 Puzzle Corner 68 46th Course at Erice 71 Bruker/MIT Symposium 72 2014 ACA Meeting in Albuquerque 75 Corporate Members 77 Calendar of Meetings The D8 QUEST ECO Contributions to ACA RefleXions may be sent to either of the Editors: Please address matters pertaining to advertisements, membership With the D8 QUEST ECO, making the right choice is easy. Not only is it affordable and economical inquiries, or use of the ACA mailing list to: with minimal maintenance, it is also environmentally friendly offering low power requirements and Connie (Chidester) Rajnak Judith L.
[Show full text]
Open Letter to the American People
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: October 18, 2016 AN OPEN LETTER TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE The coming Presidential election will have profound consequences for the future of our country and the world. To preserve our freedoms, protect our constitutional government, safeguard our national security, and ensure that all members of our nation will be able to work together for a better future, it is imperative that Hillary Clinton be elected as the next President of the United States. Some of the most pressing problems that the new President will face — the devastating effects of debilitating diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease and cancer, the need for alternative sources of energy, and climate change and its consequences — require vigorous support for science and technology and the assurance that scientific knowledge will inform public policy. Such support is essential to this country’s economic future, its health, its security, and its prestige. Strong advocacy for science agencies, initiatives to promote innovation, and sensible immigration and education policies are crucial to the continued preeminence of the U.S. scientific work force. We need a President who will support and advance policies that will enable science and technology to flourish in our country and to provide the basis of important policy decisions. For these reasons and others, we, as U.S. Nobel Laureates concerned about the future of our nation, strongly and fully support Hillary Clinton to be the President of the United States. Peter Agre, Chemistry 2003 Carol W. Greider, Medicine 2009 Sidney Altman, Chemistry 1989 David J. Gross, Physics 2004 Philip W. Anderson, Physics 1977 Roger Guillemin, Medicine 1977 Kenneth J.
[Show full text]
Who Got Moseley's Prize?
Chapter 4 Who Got Moseley’s Prize? Virginia Trimble1 and Vera V. Mainz*,2 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697-4575, United States 2Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61802, United States *E-mail: [email protected]. Henry Gwyn Jeffreys Moseley (1887-1915) made prompt and very skilled use of the then new technique of X-ray scattering by crystals (Bragg scattering) to solve several problems about the periodic table and atoms. He was nominated for both the chemistry and physics Nobel Prizes by Svante Arrhenius in 1915, but was dead at Gallipoli before the committees finished their deliberations. Instead, the 1917 physics prize (announced in 1918 and presented on 6 June 1920) went to Charles Glover Barkla (1877-1944) “for discovery of the Röntgen radiation of the elements.” This, and his discovery of X-ray polarization, were done with earlier techniques that he never gave up. Moseley’s contemporaries and later historians of science have written that he would have gone on to other major achievements and a Nobel Prize if he had lived. In contrast, after about 1916, Barkla moved well outside the scientific mainstream, clinging to upgrades of his older methods, denying the significance of the Bohr atom and quantization, and continuing to report evidence for what he called the J phenomenon. This chapter addresses the lives and scientific endeavors of Moseley and Barkla, something about the context in which they worked and their connections with other scientists, contemporary, earlier, and later. © 2017 American Chemical Society Introduction Henry Moseley’s (Figure 1) academic credentials consisted of a 1910 Oxford BA with first-class honors in Mathematical Moderations and a second in Natural Sciences (physics) and the MA that followed more or less automatically a few years later.
[Show full text]