DOCSLIB.ORG

Federation of American Scientists

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federation of American Scientists FEDERATION OF AMERICAN SCIENTISTS T: 202/546-3300 1717 K Street NW #209 Washington, DC 20036 www.fas.org F: 202/675-1010 [email protected] Board of Sponsors (Partial List) November 12, 2001 *Sidney Altman *Philip W. Anderson Hon Tom Daschle Hon J. Dennis Hastert *Kenneth J. Arrow *Julius Axelrod Senate Majority Leader Speaker of the House *David Baltimore *Baruj Benacerraf *Hans A. Bethe *J. Michael Bishop Hon Trent Lott Hon Richard Gephardt *Nicolaas Bloembergen *Norman Borlaug Senate Minority Leader House Minority Leader *Paul Boyer Ann Pitts Carter *Owen Chamberlain In the interest of national security we urge you to deny funding for any program, project, or Morris Cohen *Stanley Cohen activity that is inconsistent with the Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty. The tragic events Mildred Cohn *Leon N. Cooper of September 11 eliminated any doubt that America faces security needs far more substantial *E. J. Corey *James Cronin than a technically improbable defense against a strategically improbable Third World *Johann Deisenhofer ballistic missile attack. Ann Druyan *Renato Dulbecco John T. Edsall Paul R. Ehrlich Regarding the probable threat, the September 11 attacks have dramatized what has been George Field obvious for years: A primitive ICBM, with its dubious accuracy and reliability and bearing *Val L. Fitch *Jerome I. Friedman a clear return address, is unattractive to a terrorist and a most improbable delivery system for John Kenneth Galbraith *Walter Gilbert a terrorist weapon. Devoting massive effort and expense to countering the least probable *Donald Glaser and least effective threat would be unwise. *Sheldon L. Glashow Marvin L. Goldberger *Joseph L. Goldstein *Roger C. L. Guillemin Regarding the technology, while “hitting a bullet with a bullet” under laboratory conditions *Herbert A. Hauptman is feasible, it is far more difficult to design a system that can survive and provide effective *Dudley R. Herschbach *Roald Hoffmann protection against a surprise attack that employs varying countermeasures, some of which John P. Holdren *David H. Hubel may surprise the defense. The inherent advantages of the offense exceed the inherent *Jerome Karle *H. Gobind Khorana advantages of superior American technology, particularly if the offense is a rogue state that *Arthur Kornberg needs only to succeed with one among many weapons to accomplish its purpose. *Edwin G. Krebs *Willis E. Lamb *Leon Lederman *Edward Lewis Previous attempts at a national missile defense have collapsed as it became evident that *William N. Lipscomb performance was much lower and cost much higher than advertised. We see no evidence Jessica T. Mathews Roy Menninger systems currently being put forward will meet or merit a different fate. Matthew S. Meselson *Franco Modigliani *Mario Molina Philip Morrison Our nation can gain more effective protection against a weapon of mass destruction on a Stephen S. Morse ballistic missile by keeping such weapons from proliferating into the hands of hostile *Joseph E. Murray Franklin A. Neva entities. Abrogation of the ABM Treaty, added to recent expressions of hostility toward *Marshall Nirenberg *Douglas D. Osheroff other arms control agreements, would also undermine nonproliferation. It would also *Arno A. Penzias undermine as well cooperation with Russia and China on reducing nuclear dangers. We *Martin L. Perl George Rathjens therefore urge that the ABM Treaty remain in force. *Burton Richter *Richard J. Roberts *J. Robert Schrieffer Andrew Sessler *Phillip A. Sharp Hans Bethe Steven Weinberg George A. Silver *Richard E. Smalley Cornell University University of Texas at Austin *Robert M. Solow *Jack Steinberger 1967 Nobel Prize in Physics 1979 Nobel Prize in Physics *Henry Taube *James Tobin *Charles H. Townes Frank von Hippel Robert A. Weinberg *Steven Weinberg Board of Directors Victor Weisskopf *Torsten N. Wiesel Frank von Hippel Steve Fetter Harold Feiveson Henry Kelly Alfred Yankauer Chair Vice Chair Secretary-Treasurer President Herbert F. York Ruth S. Adams Richard Garwin Michael Mann William Revelle Gregory Simon * Nobel Laureate David Albright Marvin Goldberger Hazel O’Leary Shankar Sastry Lynn Sykes Bruce Blair Kenneth Luongo Jane Owen Jonathan Silver Gregory van der Vink Ex officio: Carl Kaysen, Robert Solow Sidney Altman Philip Anderson Kenneth Arrow Yale University Princeton University Stanford University 1989 Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1977 Nobel Prize in Physics 1972 Nobel Prize in Economics Julius Axelrod David Baltimore Baruj Benacerraf National Institutes of Health The Baltimore Family Fund Harvard Medical School 1970 Nobel Prize in Medicine 1975 Nobel Prize in Medicine 1980 Nobel Prize in Medicine J. Michael Bishop Nicolaas Bloembergen Paul Boyer University of California Medical Cente r Harvard University University of California 1989 Nobel Prize in Medicine 1981 Nobel Prize in Physics 1997 Nobel Prize in Chemistry Owen Chamberlain E. J. Corey James Cronin Lawrence Berkeley Lab Harvard University Enrico Fermi Institute 1959 Nobel Prize Physics 1990 Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1980 Noble Prize in Physics Johann Deisenhofer Val Fitch Jerome Friedman Southwestern Medical Center Princeton University MIT 1988 Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1980 Nobel Prize in Physics 1990 Nobel Prize in Physics Walter Gilbert Donald Glaser Sheldon Glashow Biological Laboratories, University of California Harvard University 1980 Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1960 Nobel Prize in Physics 1979 Nobel Prize in Physics Paul Greengard Roger Guillemin Dudley Herschbach The Rockefeller University The Salk Institute Harvard University 2000 Nobel Prize in Medicine 1977 Nobel Prize in Medicine 1986 Nobel Prize in Chemistry Roald Hoffmann Jerome Karle Walter Kohn Cornell University Department of the Navy University of California 1981 Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1985 Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1998 Nobel Prize in Chemistry Arthur Kornberg Edwin Krebs Herbert Kroemer Stanford University University of Washington University of California 1959 Nobel Prize in Medicine 1992 Nobel Prize in Medicine 2000 Nobel Prize in Physics Leon Lederman Edward Lewis Rudolph Marcus Fermi National Accelerator Laborator y CalTech Cal Tech 1988 Nobel Prize in Physics 1995 Nobel Prize in Medicine 1992 Nobel Prize Chemistry Franco Modigliani Mario Molina Joseph Murray MIT MIT Brigham and Women's Hospital 1985 Nobel Prize in Economics 1995 Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1990 Nobel Prize in Medicine Marshall Nirenberg Douglass Osheroff Arno Penzias National Institutes of Health Stanford University Bell Laboratories 1968 Nobel Prize in Medicine 1996 Nobel Prize in Physics 1978 Nobel Prize in Physics Martin Perl William Phillips Norman Ramsey Stanford University NIST Harvard University 1995 Nobel Prize in Physics 1997 Nobel Prize in Physics 1989 Nobel Prize in Physics Richard Roberts Robert Solow Jack Steinberger New England Bio Labs MIT CERN 1993 Nobel Prize in Medicine 1987 Nobel Prize in Economics 1988 Nobel Prize in Physics Joseph Taylor James Tobin Charles Townes Princeton University Yale University University of California 1993 Nobel Prize in Physics 1981 Nobel Prize in Economics 1964 Nobel Prize in Physics Daniel Tsui Eric Wieschaus Robert Wilson Princeton University Princeton University Harvard University 1998 Nobel Prize in Physics 1995 Nobel Prize in Medicine 1978 Nobel Prize in Physics .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unrestricted Immigration and the Foreign Dominance Of
    Unrestricted Immigration and the Foreign Dominance of United States Nobel Prize Winners in Science: Irrefutable Data and Exemplary Family Narratives—Backup Data and Information Andrew A. Beveridge, Queens and Graduate Center CUNY and Social Explorer, Inc. Lynn Caporale, Strategic Scientific Advisor and Author The following slides were presented at the recent meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. This project and paper is an outgrowth of that session, and will combine qualitative data on Nobel Prize Winners family histories along with analyses of the pattern of Nobel Winners. The first set of slides show some of the patterns so far found, and will be augmented for the formal paper. The second set of slides shows some examples of the Nobel families. The authors a developing a systematic data base of Nobel Winners (mainly US), their careers and their family histories. This turned out to be much more challenging than expected, since many winners do not emphasize their family origins in their own biographies or autobiographies or other commentary. Dr. Caporale has reached out to some laureates or their families to elicit that information. We plan to systematically compare the laureates to the population in the US at large, including immigrants and non‐immigrants at various periods. Outline of Presentation • A preliminary examination of the 609 Nobel Prize Winners, 291 of whom were at an American Institution when they received the Nobel in physics, chemistry or physiology and medicine • Will look at patterns of
    [Show full text]
  • Alfred Nobel
    www.bibalex.org/bioalex2004conf The BioVisionAlexandria 2004 Conference Newsletter November 2003 Volume 1, Issue 2 BioVisionAlexandria ALFRED NOBEL 2004 aims to celebrate the The inventor, the industrialist outstanding scientists and scholars, in a he Nobel Prize is one of the highest distinctions recognized, granting its winner century dominated by instant fame. However, many do not know the interesting history and background technological and T that led to this award. scientific revolutions, through its It all began with a chemist, known as Alfred Nobel, born in Stockholm, Sweden in 1833. Nobel Day on 3 April Alfred Nobel moved to Russia when he was eight, where his father, Immanuel Nobel, 2004! started a successful mechanical workshop. He provided equipment for the Russian Army and designed naval mines, which effectively prevented the British Royal Navy from moving within firing range of St. Petersburg during the Crimean War. Immanuel Nobel was also a pioneer in the manufacture of arms, and in designing steam engines. INSIDE Scientific awards .........3 Immanuel’s success enabled him to Alfred met Ascanio Sobrero, the Italian Confirmed laureates ....4 Lady laureates ............7 provide his four sons with an excellent chemist who had invented Nitroglycerine education in natural sciences, languages three years earlier. Nitroglycerine, a and literature. Alfred, at an early age, highly explosive liquid, was produced by acquired extensive literary knowledge, mixing glycerine with sulfuric and nitric mastering many foreign languages. His acid. It was an invention that triggered a Nobel Day is interest in science, especially chemistry, fascination in the young scientist for many dedicated to many of was also apparent.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Development Internationalist of the Week
    PAD6836 Lecture 8 University of North Florida Master of Public Administration program PAD 6836 Comparative public administration Economic development Internationalist of the week photo credit Manmohan Singh * Among other things, in our discussions of corruption we’ve noted that there is a difficult cycle to break out of in terms of governance: poor countries cannot afford to pay salaries that attract competent people into public service, and as a result of the corruption and inefficiency that results, citizens have little inclination to pay the taxes needed to attract and keep good people in public administration. George’s more or less random thoughts on development Progress! The general idea of economic development is to increase the productivity of society so that it produces more goods and services. Everyone wants it. Especially among left-wing critics, development (even ‘progress’) is often criticized as being materialistic, and/or a Western pathology acting as a siren’s song to lure traditional societies out of their Ruritanian idyls (I’m not sure if ‘idyl’ works with Ruritanian, but it sounds good – click for a discussion of Ruritania). This is probably not the case, for at least two reasons: 1. There isn’t much evidence to support this, among actually existing human societies (an exception). 2. Critics seem unable to understand that at lower levels of development, ‘more stuff’ means housing that protects one from the elements and vermin, health care, more efficient tools, etc. Preconditions. Causes of economic growth (drawing from Parkin 2005, with many modifications) Free markets – understood as relatively free, given what is possible in an imperfect world.
    [Show full text]
  • 書 名 等 発行年 出版社 受賞年 備考 N1 Ueber Das Zustandekommen Der
    書 名 等 発行年 出版社 受賞年 備考 Ueber das Zustandekommen der Diphtherie-immunitat und der Tetanus-Immunitat bei thieren / Emil Adolf N1 1890 Georg thieme 1901 von Behring N2 Diphtherie und tetanus immunitaet / Emil Adolf von Behring und Kitasato 19-- [Akitomo Matsuki] 1901 Malarial fever its cause, prevention and treatment containing full details for the use of travellers, University press of N3 1902 1902 sportsmen, soldiers, and residents in malarious places / by Ronald Ross liverpool Ueber die Anwendung von concentrirten chemischen Lichtstrahlen in der Medicin / von Prof. Dr. Niels N4 1899 F.C.W.Vogel 1903 Ryberg Finsen Mit 4 Abbildungen und 2 Tafeln Twenty-five years of objective study of the higher nervous activity (behaviour) of animals / Ivan N5 Petrovitch Pavlov ; translated and edited by W. Horsley Gantt ; with the collaboration of G. Volborth ; and c1928 International Publishing 1904 an introduction by Walter B. Cannon Conditioned reflexes : an investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex / by Ivan Oxford University N6 1927 1904 Petrovitch Pavlov ; translated and edited by G.V. Anrep Press N7 Die Ätiologie und die Bekämpfung der Tuberkulose / Robert Koch ; eingeleitet von M. Kirchner 1912 J.A.Barth 1905 N8 Neue Darstellung vom histologischen Bau des Centralnervensystems / von Santiago Ramón y Cajal 1893 Veit 1906 Traité des fiévres palustres : avec la description des microbes du paludisme / par Charles Louis Alphonse N9 1884 Octave Doin 1907 Laveran N10 Embryologie des Scorpions / von Ilya Ilyich Mechnikov 1870 Wilhelm Engelmann 1908 Immunität bei Infektionskrankheiten / Ilya Ilyich Mechnikov ; einzig autorisierte übersetzung von Julius N11 1902 Gustav Fischer 1908 Meyer Die experimentelle Chemotherapie der Spirillosen : Syphilis, Rückfallfieber, Hühnerspirillose, Frambösie / N12 1910 J.Springer 1908 von Paul Ehrlich und S.
    [Show full text]
  • Biochemistrystanford00kornrich.Pdf
    University of California Berkeley Regional Oral History Office University of California The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California Program in the History of the Biosciences and Biotechnology Arthur Kornberg, M.D. BIOCHEMISTRY AT STANFORD, BIOTECHNOLOGY AT DNAX With an Introduction by Joshua Lederberg Interviews Conducted by Sally Smith Hughes, Ph.D. in 1997 Copyright 1998 by The Regents of the University of California Since 1954 the Regional Oral History Office has been interviewing leading participants in or well-placed witnesses to major events in the development of Northern California, the West, and the Nation. Oral history is a method of collecting historical information through tape-recorded interviews between a narrator with firsthand knowledge of historically significant events and a well- informed interviewer, with the goal of preserving substantive additions to the historical record. The tape recording is transcribed, lightly edited for continuity and clarity, and reviewed by the interviewee. The corrected manuscript is indexed, bound with photographs and illustrative materials, and placed in The Bancroft Library at the University of California, Berkeley, and in other research collections for scholarly use. Because it is primary material, oral history is not intended to present the final, verified, or complete narrative of events. It is a spoken account, offered by the interviewee in response to questioning, and as such it is reflective, partisan, deeply involved, and irreplaceable. ************************************ All uses of this manuscript are covered by a legal agreement between The Regents of the University of California and Arthur Kornberg, M.D., dated June 18, 1997. The manuscript is thereby made available for research purposes. All literary rights in the manuscript, including the right to publish, are reserved to The Bancroft Library of the University of California, Berkeley.
    [Show full text]
  • Henry Taube Papers SC0731SC0731
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt329035mg No online items Guide to the Henry Taube Papers SC0731SC0731 Stanford University Archives staff Department of Special Collections and University Archives October 2010 Green Library 557 Escondido Mall Stanford 94305-6064 [email protected] URL: http://library.stanford.edu/spc Note This encoded finding aid is compliant with Stanford EAD Best Practice Guidelines, Version 1.0. Guide to the Henry Taube Papers SC073117755 1 SC0731SC0731 Language of Material: English Contributing Institution: Department of Special Collections and University Archives Title: Henry Taube papers Creator: Taube, Henry Identifier/Call Number: SC0731 Identifier/Call Number: 17755 Physical Description: 65.25 Linear Feet(56 boxes) Date (inclusive): 1941-2003 Abstract: Collection pertains to his teaching and research, primarily while at Stanford University, and includes grant files, articles and papers, reprints, class files, correspondence, travel records, and biographical materials. Information about Access This collection is open for research; materials must be requested at least 48 hours in advance of intended use. Ownership & Copyright All requests to reproduce, publish, quote from, or otherwise use collection materials must be submitted in writing to the Head of Special Collections and University Archives, Stanford University Libraries, Stanford, California 94304-6064. Consent is given on behalf of Special Collections as the owner of the physical items and is not intended to include or imply permission from the copyright owner. Such permission must be obtained from the copyright owner, heir(s) or assigns. See: http://library.stanford.edu/depts/spc/pubserv/permissions.html. Restrictions also apply to digital representations of the original materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture Program
    EARL W. SUTHERLAND LECTURE EARL W. SUTHERLAND LECTURE The Earl W. Sutherland Lecture Series was established by the SPONSORED BY: Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics in 1997 DEPARTMENT OF MOLECULAR PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOPHYSICS to honor Dr. Sutherland, a former member of this department and winner of the 1971 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. This series highlights important advances in cell signaling. ROBERT J. LEFKOWITZ, MD NOBEL PRIZE IN CHEMISTRY, 2012 SPEAKERS IN THIS SERIES HAVE INCLUDED: SEVEN TRANSMEMBRANE RECEPTORS Edmond H. Fischer (1997) Alfred G. Gilman (1999) Ferid Murad (2001) Louis J. Ignarro (2003) MARCH 31, 2016 Paul Greengard (2007) 4:00 P.M. 208 LIGHT HALL Eric Kandel (2009) Roger Tsien (2011) Michael S. Brown (2013) 867-2923-Institution-Discovery Lecture Series-Lefkowitz-BK-CH.indd 1 3/11/16 9:39 AM EARL W. SUTHERLAND, 1915-1974 ROBERT J. LEFKOWITZ, MD JAMES B. DUKE PROFESSOR, Earl W. Sutherland grew up in Burlingame, Kansas, a small farming community DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER that nourished his love for the outdoors and fishing, which he retained throughout INVESTIGATOR, HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE his life. He graduated from Washburn College in 1937 and then received his MEMBER, NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES M.D. from Washington University School of Medicine in 1942. After serving as a MEMBER, INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE medical officer during World War II, he returned to Washington University to train NOBEL PRIZE IN CHEMISTRY, 2012 with Carl and Gerty Cori. During those years he was influenced by his interactions with such eminent scientists as Louis Leloir, Herman Kalckar, Severo Ochoa, Arthur Kornberg, Christian deDuve, Sidney Colowick, Edwin Krebs, Theodore Robert J.
    [Show full text]
  • Nobel Laureates Endorse Joe Biden
    Nobel Laureates endorse Joe Biden 81 American Nobel Laureates in Physics, Chemistry, and Medicine have signed this letter to express their support for former Vice President Joe Biden in the 2020 election for President of the United States. At no time in our nation’s history has there been a greater need for our leaders to appreciate the value of science in formulating public policy. During his long record of public service, Joe Biden has consistently demonstrated his willingness to listen to experts, his understanding of the value of international collaboration in research, and his respect for the contribution that immigrants make to the intellectual life of our country. As American citizens and as scientists, we wholeheartedly endorse Joe Biden for President. Name Category Prize Year Peter Agre Chemistry 2003 Sidney Altman Chemistry 1989 Frances H. Arnold Chemistry 2018 Paul Berg Chemistry 1980 Thomas R. Cech Chemistry 1989 Martin Chalfie Chemistry 2008 Elias James Corey Chemistry 1990 Joachim Frank Chemistry 2017 Walter Gilbert Chemistry 1980 John B. Goodenough Chemistry 2019 Alan Heeger Chemistry 2000 Dudley R. Herschbach Chemistry 1986 Roald Hoffmann Chemistry 1981 Brian K. Kobilka Chemistry 2012 Roger D. Kornberg Chemistry 2006 Robert J. Lefkowitz Chemistry 2012 Roderick MacKinnon Chemistry 2003 Paul L. Modrich Chemistry 2015 William E. Moerner Chemistry 2014 Mario J. Molina Chemistry 1995 Richard R. Schrock Chemistry 2005 K. Barry Sharpless Chemistry 2001 Sir James Fraser Stoddart Chemistry 2016 M. Stanley Whittingham Chemistry 2019 James P. Allison Medicine 2018 Richard Axel Medicine 2004 David Baltimore Medicine 1975 J. Michael Bishop Medicine 1989 Elizabeth H. Blackburn Medicine 2009 Michael S.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemistry News
    Fall 2015 Chemistry News Filling the Chemical Sciences Pipeline Future chemists are being recruited by the Department of Chemistry at every age from grade school children to postdoctoral scholars. Hands-on activities encourage girls to learn and explore their potential in science, technology, math and engineering. FEMMES, a UM student organization, organizes events for 4th-6th grade girls on campus and in afterschool programs. Chemistry faculty organized lab tours for students students newly admitted to the University of Michigan in the Summer Bridge program. afety glasses and gloves in place, Johana and a dozen other fourth grade Sgirls used pipettes to drip a creamy mixture into cups of liquid nitrogen, watching the drops freeze instantly into an ice cream treat. After the graduate students strained the tasty dots out of the cup, the girls were able to eat the Cass Technical High School students spent the summer doing result of their experiment. research as part of the UM Detroit Research Internship These girls were attending an all-day event at the UM Chemistry build- Summer Experience, D-RISE. They participated alongside the ing organized by FEMMES, Females Excelling More in Math, Engineering, UM graduate students in the Karle Symposium. and the Sciences. FEMMES aims to inspire young girls, encouraging them to consider their potential in science and math. Each event features hands-on activities led by volunteers. Chemistry’s undergraduates, graduate students, and faculty are very active in the Michigan chapter of FEMMES. On a recent Saturday, FEMMES brought 300 girls to campus from Detroit and area schools to participate in twenty different activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Accidental Prime Minister
    THE ACCIDENTAL PRIME MINISTER THE ACCIDENTAL PRIME MINISTER THE MAKING AND UNMAKING OF MANMOHAN SINGH SANJAYA BARU VIKING Published by the Penguin Group Penguin Books India Pvt. Ltd, 11 Community Centre, Panchsheel Park, New Delhi 110 017, India Penguin Group (USA) Inc., 375 Hudson Street, New York, New York 10014, USA Penguin Group (Canada), 90 Eglinton Avenue East, Suite 700, Toronto, Ontario, M4P 2Y3, Canada (a division of Pearson Penguin Canada Inc.) Penguin Books Ltd, 80 Strand, London WC2R 0RL, England Penguin Ireland, 25 St Stephen’s Green, Dublin 2, Ireland (a division of Penguin Books Ltd) Penguin Group (Australia), 707 Collins Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3008, Australia (a division of Pearson Australia Group Pty Ltd) Penguin Group (NZ), 67 Apollo Drive, Rosedale, Auckland 0632, New Zealand (a division of Pearson New Zealand Ltd) Penguin Group (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd, Block D, Rosebank Offi ce Park, 181 Jan Smuts Avenue, Parktown North, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa Penguin Books Ltd, Registered Offi ces: 80 Strand, London WC2R 0RL, England First published in Viking by Penguin Books India 2014 Copyright © Sanjaya Baru 2014 All rights reserved 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 The views and opinions expressed in this book are the author’s own and the facts are as reported by him which have been verifi ed to the extent possible, and the publishers are not in any way liable for the same. ISBN 9780670086740 Typeset in Bembo by R. Ajith Kumar, New Delhi Printed at Thomson Press India Ltd, New Delhi This book is sold subject to the condition that
    [Show full text]
  • See the Scientific Petition
    May 20, 2016 Implement the Endangered Species Act Using the Best Available Science To: Secretary Sally Jewell and Secretary Penny Prtizker We, the under-signed scientists, recommend the U.S. government place species conservation policy on firmer scientific footing by following the procedure described below for using the best available science. A recent survey finds that substantial numbers of scientists at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration believe that political influence at their agency is too high.i Further, recent species listing and delisting decisions appear misaligned with scientific understanding.ii,iii,iv,v,vi For example, in its nationwide delisting decision for gray wolves in 2013, the FWS internal review failed the best science test when reviewed by an independent peer-review panel.vii Just last year, a FWS decision not to list the wolverine ran counter to the opinions of agency and external scientists.viii We ask that the Departments of the Interior and Commerce make determinations under the Endangered Species Actix only after they make public the independent recommendations from the scientific community, based on the best available science. The best available science comes from independent scientists with relevant expertise who are able to evaluate and synthesize the available science, and adhere to standards of peer-review and full conflict-of-interest disclosure. We ask that agency scientific recommendations be developed with external review by independent scientific experts. There are several mechanisms by which this can happen; however, of greatest importance is that an independent, external, and transparent science-based process is applied consistently to both listing and delisting decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Nfap Policy Brief » O C T O B E R 2017
    NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR AMERICAN POLICY NFAP POLICY BRIEF» O CTOBER 2017 IMMIGRANTS AND NOBEL PRIZES : 1901- 2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Immigrants have been awarded 39 percent, or 33 of 85, of the Nobel Prizes won by Americans in Chemistry, Medicine and Physics since 2000. In 2017, the sole American winner of the Nobel Prize in Chemistry was an immigrant, Joachim Frank, a Columbia University professor born in Germany. Immigrant Reiner Weiss, who was born in Germany and came to the United States as a teenager, was awarded the 2017 Nobel Prize in Physics, sharing it with two other Americans, Kip S. Thorne and Barry C. Barish. In 2016, all 6 American winners of the Nobel Prize in economics and scientific fields were immigrants. These achievements by immigrants point to the gains to America of welcoming talent from across the globe. It does not mean America should welcome only Nobel Prize winners. Such a policy would be impossible to implement, since most immigrant Nobel Prize winners enter the United States many years before being awarded this honor. Most people immigrate to another country in their 20s, particularly employment-based immigrants, who either study in America or come here to work shortly after obtaining a degree abroad. The average of age of Nobel Prize winners at the time of the award is 59.5 years, according to economist Mark J. Perry.1 Table 1 Immigrant Nobel Prize Winners in Chemistry, Medicine and Physics Since 2000 Immigrant Nobel Winners Since 2000 33 of 85 American winners have been immigrants Percentage of Immigrant Winners Since 2000 39% Source: Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, National Foundation for American Policy, George Mason University Institute for Immigration Research.
    [Show full text]