DOCSLIB.ORG

Size Structure and Reproductive Status of Exploited Reef-Fish Populations at Kamiali Wildlife Management Area, Papua New Guinea

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Size Structure and Reproductive Status of Exploited Reef-Fish Populations at Kamiali Wildlife Management Area, Papua New Guinea Size Structure and Reproductive Status of Exploited Reef-Fish Populations at Kamiali Wildlife Management Area, Papua New Guinea Ken Longenecker, Ross Langston, Holly Bolick, and Utula Kondio Honolulu, Hawaii November 2012 COVER Eight-year-old John Giamsa (center), helps Ross Langston (left), prepare histological sections of fish gonads for rapid reproductive analysis. Size Structure and Reproductive Status of Exploited Reef-Fish Populations at Kamiali Wildlife Management Area, Papua New Guinea Ken Longenecker1, Ross Langston1, Holly Bolick1, and Utula Kondio2 (1) Pacific Biological Survey Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawaii 96817, USA (2) Kamiali Wildlife Management Area Lababia, Morobe Province, PNG Bishop Museum Technical Report 59 Honolulu, Hawaii November 2012 Bishop Museum Press 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai‘i Copyright © 2012 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America ISSN 1085-455X Contribution No. 2012-016 to the Pacific Biological Survey Contents List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. 6 List of Figures................................................................................................................................. 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 10 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 12 Kala Words and a Pronunciation Guide.................................................................................... 12 Background............................................................................................................................... 12 Fishery Surveys......................................................................................................................... 13 Reproductive Analysis.............................................................................................................. 13 Size-at-maturity..................................................................................................................... 13 Batch Fecundity and Sex-ratios ............................................................................................ 14 Catch Characteristics ................................................................................................................ 15 Purpose...................................................................................................................................... 16 METHODS ................................................................................................................................... 16 Study Area ................................................................................................................................ 16 Rapid Reproductive Analysis ................................................................................................... 17 Catch Characteristics ................................................................................................................ 18 Fishery Surveys......................................................................................................................... 18 Time Series ............................................................................................................................... 20 RESULTS ..................................................................................................................................... 21 Reproductive Analysis.............................................................................................................. 21 Length-Weight Relationships ................................................................................................... 22 Fishery Surveys......................................................................................................................... 22 Species Accounts ...................................................................................................................... 32 Acanthuridae......................................................................................................................... 32 Ctenochaetus tominiensis.................................................................................................. 32 Naso hexacanthus (biaŋgawe suwi).................................................................................. 32 Naso lopezi (biaŋgawe talõ) ............................................................................................. 33 Naso vlamingii (biaŋgawe tumi)....................................................................................... 34 Balistidae............................................................................................................................... 34 Canthidermis maculata (labaikã suwi)............................................................................. 34 Caesionidae........................................................................................................................... 34 Caesio cuning (luduŋ ŋai or mai) ..................................................................................... 34 Carangidae ............................................................................................................................ 35 Carangoides bajad (imaŋalẽ babaura)............................................................................. 35 Carangoides plagiotaenia (imaŋalẽ tombo gabo) ............................................................ 36 Caranx melampygus (imaŋalẽ talã).................................................................................. 37 Caranx papuensis (imaŋalẽ labrã kulĩ) ............................................................................ 38 Carcharhinidae ...................................................................................................................... 39 Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos........................................................................................... 39 Triaenodon obesus............................................................................................................ 39 Ephippidae ............................................................................................................................ 39 Platax pinnatus (ibuŋgi tarõ)............................................................................................ 39 Platax teira (ibuŋgi).......................................................................................................... 40 Haemulidae ........................................................................................................................... 40 3 Diagramma pictum (godobo manibarã/tarõ) ................................................................... 40 Plectorhinchus lineatus (iyabua sa).................................................................................. 41 Plectorhinchus vittatus...................................................................................................... 42 Holocentridae........................................................................................................................ 42 Myripristis adusta (imbilĩ tombo gabo) ............................................................................ 42 Myripristis berndti ............................................................................................................ 43 Myripristis kuntee (imbilĩ godõ nambĩ) ............................................................................ 44 Myripristis pralinia........................................................................................................... 45 Myripristis violacea (imbilĩ yakẽ bumbu)......................................................................... 45 Myripristis vittata (imbilĩ yakẽ suwi)................................................................................ 46 Neoniphon sammara (imbilĩ sa)........................................................................................ 47 Sargocentron caudimaculatum (imbilĩ yasai)................................................................... 48 Kyphosidae ........................................................................................................................... 49 Kyphosus cinerascens (italawe)........................................................................................ 49 Kyphosus vaigiensis (italawe talabopia) .......................................................................... 50 Labridae ................................................................................................................................ 50 Choerodon anchorago ...................................................................................................... 50 Cheilinus fasciatus............................................................................................................ 50 Oxycheilinus celebicus...................................................................................................... 51 Oxycheilinus digramma .................................................................................................... 51 Lethrinidae ............................................................................................................................ 51 Lethrinus erythropterus (kada maba) ..............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reef Snappers (Lutjanidae)
    #05 Reef snappers (Lutjanidae) Two-spot red snapper (Lutjanus bohar) Mangrove red snapper Blacktail snapper (Lutjanus argentimaculatus) (Lutjanus fulvus) Common bluestripe snapper (Lutjanus kasmira) Humpback red snapper Emperor red snapper (Lutjanus gibbus) (Lutjanus sebae) Species & Distribution Habitats & Feeding The family Lutjanidae contains more than 100 species of Although most snappers live near coral reefs, some species tropical and sub-tropical fi sh known as snappers. are found in areas of less salty water in the mouths of rivers. Most species of interest in the inshore fi sheries of Pacifi c Islands belong to the genus Lutjanus, which contains about The young of some species school on seagrass beds and 60 species. sandy areas, while larger fi sh may be more solitary and live on coral reefs. Many species gather in large feeding schools One of the most widely distributed of the snappers in the around coral formations during daylight hours. Pacifi c Ocean is the common bluestripe snapper, Lutjanus kasmira, which reaches lengths of about 30 cm. The species Snappers feed on smaller fi sh, crabs, shrimps, and sea snails. is found in many Pacifi c Islands and was introduced into They are eaten by a number of larger fi sh. In some locations, Hawaii in the 1950s. species such as the two-spot red snapper, Lutjanus bohar, are responsible for ciguatera fi sh poisoning (see the glossary in the Guide to Information Sheets). #05 Reef snappers (Lutjanidae) Reproduction & Life cycle Snappers have separate sexes. Smaller species have a maximum lifespan of about 4 years and larger species live for more than 15 years.
    [Show full text]
  • (2014), Volume 2, Issue 8, 301-306
    ISSN 2320-5407 International Journal of Advanced Research (2014), Volume 2, Issue 8, 301-306 Journal homepage: http://www.journalijar.com INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED RESEARCH RESEARCH ARTICLE Checklist of Fishes from Interu Mangrove Swamp of River Krishna Estuarine Region Andhra Pradesh, India Madhusudhana Rao, K* and Krishna, P.V. Acharya Nagarjuna University, Dept. of Zoology and Aquaculture, Nagarjuna Nagar- 522 510, India. Manuscript Info Abstract Manuscript History: Interu mangrove swamp is located in the North Eastern part of River Krishna estuary. In the present study 60 species of 47 genera, 29 families and 6 orders Received: 15 June 2014 Final Accepted: 19 July 2014 of fish were recorded form the swamp. Order Perciformes is the dominant Published Online: August 2014 whereas Gonorynchiformes, Siluriformes and Beloniformes are least representation. Of which one species each, represented to Vulnerable (VU); Key words: Near Threatened (NT); Data Deficient (DD) while 39 species Not Evaluated Krishna estuary, Mangrove swamp, (NE) and 17 species Least Concern (LC) from the Interu mangrove swamp. Fishes, IUCN status *Corresponding Author Copy Right, IJAR, 2014,. All rights reserved Madhusudhana Rao, K Introduction River Krishna is one of the largest perennial rivers in east coast of India (next to River Godavari), originating from the Deccan plateau flowing eastwards and opening in the Bay of Bengal near Machilipatnam in Andhra Pradesh. Krishna estuarine system cover an area of 320 Km2 of which mangrove extends over an area of 25,000 ha which representing 5.13% of India and 42.9% of Andhra Pradesh state mangrove area (Krishna and Rao, 2011). In the Krishna estuarine region, Interu mangrove swamp located in the North Eastern part and extends over an area of 1079 ha covering 560 ha mangrove vegetation (MadhusudhanaRao, 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Estuarine Fish Diversity of Tamil Nadu, India
    Indian Journal of Geo Marine Sciences Vol. 46 (10), October 2017, pp. 1968-1985 Estuarine fish diversity of Tamil Nadu, India H.S. Mogalekar*, J. Canciyal#, P. Jawahar, D.S. Patadiya, C. Sudhan, P. Pavinkumar, Prateek, S. Santhoshkumar & A. Subburaj Department of Fisheries Biology and Resource Management, Fisheries College & Research Institute, (Tamil Nadu Fisheries University), Thoothukudi-628 008, India. #ICAR-National Academy of Agricultural Research Management, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500 030, Telangana, India. *[E-Mail: [email protected]] Received 04 February 2016 ; revised 10 August 2017 Systematic and updated checklist of estuarine fishes contains 330 species distributed under 205 genera, 95 families, 23 orders and two classes. The most diverse order was perciformes with 175 species, 100 genera and 43 families. The top four families with the highest number of species were gobidae (28 species), carangidae (23 species), engraulidae (15 species) and lutjanidae (14 species). Conservation status of all taxa includes one species as endangered, five species as vulnerable, 14 near threatened, 93 least concern and 16 data deficient. As numbers of commercial, sports, ornamental and cultivable fishes are high, commercial and recreational fishing could be organized. Seed production by selective breeding is recommended for aquaculture practices in estuarine areas of Tamil Nadu. [Keywords: Estuarine fishes, updated checklist, fishery and conservation status, Tamil Nadu] Introduction significant component of coastal ecosystem due to The total estuarine area of Tamil Nadu their immense biodiversity values in aquatic was estimated to be 56000 ha, which accounts ecology. The fish fauna inhabiting the estuarine 3.88 % of the total estuarine area of India 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Behavior of Red Snapper, Lutjanus Campechanus, in Relation to Trawl Modifications to Reduce Shrimp Trawler Bycatch
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1998 Behavior of Red Snapper, Lutjanus Campechanus, in Relation to Trawl Modifications to Reduce Shrimp Trawler Bycatch. Donna Reeve Rogers Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Rogers, Donna Reeve, "Behavior of Red Snapper, Lutjanus Campechanus, in Relation to Trawl Modifications to Reduce Shrimp Trawler Bycatch." (1998). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 6757. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/6757 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. U M I films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type o f computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send U M I a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphology and Early Life History Pattern of Some Lutjanus Species: a Review
    INT. J. BIOL. BIOTECH., 8 (3): 455-461, 2011. MORPHOLOGY AND EARLY LIFE HISTORY PATTERN OF SOME LUTJANUS SPECIES: A REVIEW *Zubia Masood and Rehana Yasmeen Farooq Department of Zoology, University of Karachi, Karachi-75270, Pakistan. *email: [email protected] ABSTRACT The present study was based on the literature review of the fishes belonging to the snapper family Lutjanidae. Data parameters about the morphology and early life history pattern not measured during the survey were taken from the FishBase data base (see www.fishbase.org and Froese et al., 2000). These data parameters included, Lmax (maximum length), Linf (length infinity); K (growth rate); M (natural mortality); LS (life span); Lm (length at maturity); tm (age at first maturity); to (age at zero length); tmax (longevity) and also the morphological data. Morphological and life history data were taken only for five species of fishes belongs to genus Lutjanus i.e., L.johnii, L.malabaricus, L.lutjanus, L.fulvus, L.russellii. The main objective of this study was to review some aspects of distribution, morphology and feeding habits, spawning and also acquired and analyze information on selected life history variables to described patterns of variation among different species of snappers. Keywords: Lutjanidae, morphology, life history. INTRODUCTION This family is commonly known as “Snappers” are perch-like fishes, moderately elongated, fairly compressed (Allen and Talbot, 1985). Small to large fishes, ranging from 15cm-120cm or 1m in length and 40 kg in weight. Mouth is terminal, jaw bear large canine teeth (no canines in Apherius); Preopercle usually serrate. Dorsal fin continuous or slightly notched with 10-12 spines and 10-17 soft rays; anal fin with 3 spines and 7-11 soft rays; pelvic fins originating just behind pectoral base.
    [Show full text]
  • Orientation of Pelagic Larvae of Coral-Reef Fishes in the Ocean
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 252: 239–253, 2003 Published April 30 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Orientation of pelagic larvae of coral-reef fishes in the ocean Jeffrey M. Leis*, Brooke M. Carson-Ewart Ichthyology, and Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Research, Australian Museum, 6 College St, Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia ABSTRACT: During the day, we used settlement-stage reef-fish larvae from light-traps to study in situ orientation, 100 to 1000 m from coral reefs in water 10 to 40 m deep, at Lizard Island, Great Barrier Reef. Seven species were observed off leeward Lizard Island, and 4 species off the windward side. All but 1 species swam faster than average ambient currents. Depending on area, time, and spe- cies, 80 to 100% of larvae swam directionally. Two species of butterflyfishes Chaetodon plebeius and Chaetodon aureofasciatus swam away from the island, indicating that they could detect the island’s reefs. Swimming of 4 species of damselfishes Chromis atripectoralis, Chrysiptera rollandi, Neo- pomacentrus cyanomos and Pomacentrus lepidogenys ranged from highly directional to non- directional. Only in N. cyanomos did swimming direction differ between windward and leeward areas. Three species (C. atripectoralis, N. cyanomos and P. lepidogenys) were observed in morning and late afternoon at the leeward area, and all swam in a more westerly direction in the late after- noon. In the afternoon, C. atripectoralis larvae were highly directional in sunny conditions, but non- directional and individually more variable in cloudy conditions. All these observations imply that damselfish larvae utilized a solar compass. Caesio cuning and P.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices Appendices
    APPENDICES APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 – PUBLICATIONS SCIENTIFIC PAPERS Aidoo EN, Ute Mueller U, Hyndes GA, and Ryan Braccini M. 2015. Is a global quantitative KL. 2016. The effects of measurement uncertainty assessment of shark populations warranted? on spatial characterisation of recreational fishing Fisheries, 40: 492–501. catch rates. Fisheries Research 181: 1–13. Braccini M. 2016. Experts have different Andrews KR, Williams AJ, Fernandez-Silva I, perceptions of the management and conservation Newman SJ, Copus JM, Wakefield CB, Randall JE, status of sharks. Annals of Marine Biology and and Bowen BW. 2016. Phylogeny of deepwater Research 3: 1012. snappers (Genus Etelis) reveals a cryptic species pair in the Indo-Pacific and Pleistocene invasion of Braccini M, Aires-da-Silva A, and Taylor I. 2016. the Atlantic. Molecular Phylogenetics and Incorporating movement in the modelling of shark Evolution 100: 361-371. and ray population dynamics: approaches and management implications. Reviews in Fish Biology Bellchambers LM, Gaughan D, Wise B, Jackson G, and Fisheries 26: 13–24. and Fletcher WJ. 2016. Adopting Marine Stewardship Council certification of Western Caputi N, de Lestang S, Reid C, Hesp A, and How J. Australian fisheries at a jurisdictional level: the 2015. Maximum economic yield of the western benefits and challenges. Fisheries Research 183: rock lobster fishery of Western Australia after 609-616. moving from effort to quota control. Marine Policy, 51: 452-464. Bellchambers LM, Fisher EA, Harry AV, and Travaille KL. 2016. Identifying potential risks for Charles A, Westlund L, Bartley DM, Fletcher WJ, Marine Stewardship Council assessment and Garcia S, Govan H, and Sanders J.
    [Show full text]
  • Mission: New Guinea]
    1 Bibliography 1. L. [Letter]. Annalen van onze lieve vrouw van het heilig hart. 1896; 14: 139-140. Note: [mission: New Guinea]. 2. L., M. [Letter]. Annalen van onze lieve vrouw van het heilig hart. 1891; 9: 139, 142. Note: [mission: Inawi]. 3. L., M. [Letter]. Annalen van onze lieve vrouw van het heilig hart. 1891; 9: 203. Note: [mission: Inawi]. 4. L., M. [Letter]. Annalen van onze lieve vrouw van het heilig hart. 1891; 9: 345, 348, 359-363. Note: [mission: Inawi]. 5. La Fontaine, Jean. Descent in New Guinea: An Africanist View. In: Goody, Jack, Editor. The Character of Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1973: 35-51. Note: [from lit: Kuma, Bena Bena, Chimbu, Siane, Daribi]. 6. Laade, Wolfgang. Der Jahresablauf auf den Inseln der Torrestraße. Anthropos. 1971; 66: 936-938. Note: [fw: Saibai, Dauan, Boigu]. 7. Laade, Wolfgang. Ethnographic Notes on the Murray Islanders, Torres Strait. Zeitschrift für Ethnologie. 1969; 94: 33-46. Note: [fw 1963-1965 (2 1/2 mos): Mer]. 8. Laade, Wolfgang. Examples of the Language of Saibai Island, Torres Straits. Anthropos. 1970; 65: 271-277. Note: [fw 1963-1965: Saibai]. 9. Laade, Wolfgang. Further Material on Kuiam, Legendary Hero of Mabuiag, Torres Strait Islands. Ethnos. 1969; 34: 70-96. Note: [fw: Mabuiag]. 10. Laade, Wolfgang. The Islands of Torres Strait. Bulletin of the International Committee on Urgent Anthropological and Ethnological Research. 1966; 8: 111-114. Note: [fw 1963-1965: Saibai, Dauan, Boigu]. 11. Laade, Wolfgang. Namen und Gebrauch einiger Seemuscheln und -schnecken auf den Murray Islands. Tribus. 1969; 18: 111-123. Note: [fw: Murray Is].
    [Show full text]
  • Species Identification Guide
    SPECIES IDENTIFICATION GUIDE Pilbara/Kimberley Region ABOUT THIS GUIDE a variety of marine and freshwater species including barramundi, tropical emperors, The Pilbara/Kimberley Region extends from sea-perches, trevallies, sooty grunter, the Ashburton River near Onslow to the threadfin, mud crabs, and cods. Northern Territory/South Australia border. The Ord and Fitzroy Rivers are two of the Recreational fishing activity in the region State’s largest river systems. They are shows distinct seasonal peaks, with the highly valued by visiting and local fishers. highest number of visitors during the winter Both river systems are relatively easy to months (dry season). Fishing pressure is access and are focal points for recreational also concentrated around key population fishers pursuing barramundi. centres. An estimated 6.5 per cent of the State’s recreational fishers fished marine Offshore islands, coral reef systems and waters in the Pilbara/Kimberley during continental shelf waters provide species of 1998/99, while a further 1.6 per cent major recreational interest, including many fished fresh waters in the region. members of the demersal sea perch family (Lutjanidae) such as scarlet sea perch and This guide provides a brief overview of red emperor, cods, coral and coronation some of the region’s most popular and trout, sharks, trevally, tuskfish, tunas, sought-after fish species. Fishing rules are mackerels and billfish. contained in a separate guide on fishing in the Pilbara/Kimberley Region. Fishing charters and fishing tournaments have becoming increasingly popular in the FISHING IN THE region over the past five years. The Dampier PILBARA/KIMBERLEY Classic and Broome sailfish tournaments are both state and national attractions, and Within the Pilbara/Kimberley Region, creek WA is gaining an international reputation for systems, mangroves, rivers and ocean the quality of its offshore pelagic sport and beaches provide shore and boat fishing for game fishing.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Fauna Diversity of Marudu Bay Mangrove Forest, Sabah, Malaysia, for Future Conservation
    Diversity 2015, 7, 137-148; doi:10.3390/d7020137 OPEN ACCESS diversity ISSN 1424-2818 www.mdpi.com/journal/diversity Article Assessing the Fauna Diversity of Marudu Bay Mangrove Forest, Sabah, Malaysia, for Future Conservation Mohamed Zakaria 1,* and Muhammad Nawaz Rajpar 2 1 Faculty of Forestry, Universiti Putra Malaysia, UPM International, Serdang 43400, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Sindh Wildlife Department, Opposite PIA Reservation Office, Moulana Din Muhammad Road, Saddar, Karachi 77550, Pakistan; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +60-192-690-355; Fax: +60-389-432-514. Academic Editor: Peter Saenger Received: 24 February 2015 / Accepted: 21 April 2015 / Published: 30 April 2015 Abstract: Mangrove is an evergreen, salt tolerant plant community, which grows in inter-tidal coastal zones of tropical and subtropical regions of the world. They are ecologically important for many fauna species and are rich in food resources and consist of many different vegetation structures. They serve as ideal foraging and nursery grounds for a wide array of species such as birds, mammals, reptiles, fishes and aquatic invertebrates. In spite of their crucial role, around 50% of mangrove habitats have been lost and degraded in the past two decades. The fauna diversity of mangrove habitat at Marudu Bay, Sabah, East Malaysia was examined using various methods: i.e. aquatic invertebrates by swap nets, fish by angling rods and cast nets, reptiles, birds, and mammals through direct sighting. The result showed that Marudu Bay mangrove habitats harbored a diversity of fauna species including 22 aquatic invertebrate species (encompassing 11 crustacean species, six mollusk species and four worm species), 36 fish species, 74 bird species, four reptile species, and four mammal species.
    [Show full text]
  • Hotspots, Extinction Risk and Conservation Priorities of Greater Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico Marine Bony Shorefishes
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Biological Sciences Theses & Dissertations Biological Sciences Summer 2016 Hotspots, Extinction Risk and Conservation Priorities of Greater Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico Marine Bony Shorefishes Christi Linardich Old Dominion University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/biology_etds Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Biology Commons, Environmental Health and Protection Commons, and the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Linardich, Christi. "Hotspots, Extinction Risk and Conservation Priorities of Greater Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico Marine Bony Shorefishes" (2016). Master of Science (MS), Thesis, Biological Sciences, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/hydh-jp82 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/biology_etds/13 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Biological Sciences at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biological Sciences Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HOTSPOTS, EXTINCTION RISK AND CONSERVATION PRIORITIES OF GREATER CARIBBEAN AND GULF OF MEXICO MARINE BONY SHOREFISHES by Christi Linardich B.A. December 2006, Florida Gulf Coast University A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE BIOLOGY OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY August 2016 Approved by: Kent E. Carpenter (Advisor) Beth Polidoro (Member) Holly Gaff (Member) ABSTRACT HOTSPOTS, EXTINCTION RISK AND CONSERVATION PRIORITIES OF GREATER CARIBBEAN AND GULF OF MEXICO MARINE BONY SHOREFISHES Christi Linardich Old Dominion University, 2016 Advisor: Dr. Kent E. Carpenter Understanding the status of species is important for allocation of resources to redress biodiversity loss.
    [Show full text]
  • Wainwright-Et-Al.-2012.Pdf
    Copyedited by: ES MANUSCRIPT CATEGORY: Article Syst. Biol. 61(6):1001–1027, 2012 © The Author(s) 2012. Published by Oxford University Press, on behalf of the Society of Systematic Biologists. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: [email protected] DOI:10.1093/sysbio/sys060 Advance Access publication on June 27, 2012 The Evolution of Pharyngognathy: A Phylogenetic and Functional Appraisal of the Pharyngeal Jaw Key Innovation in Labroid Fishes and Beyond ,∗ PETER C. WAINWRIGHT1 ,W.LEO SMITH2,SAMANTHA A. PRICE1,KEVIN L. TANG3,JOHN S. SPARKS4,LARA A. FERRY5, , KRISTEN L. KUHN6 7,RON I. EYTAN6, AND THOMAS J. NEAR6 1Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616; 2Department of Zoology, Field Museum of Natural History, 1400 South Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60605; 3Department of Biology, University of Michigan-Flint, Flint, MI 48502; 4Department of Ichthyology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024; 5Division of Mathematical and Natural Sciences, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85069; 6Department of Ecology and Evolution, Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520; and 7USDA-ARS, Beneficial Insects Introduction Research Unit, 501 South Chapel Street, Newark, DE 19713, USA; ∗ Correspondence to be sent to: Department of Evolution & Ecology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA; E-mail: [email protected]. Received 22 September 2011; reviews returned 30 November 2011; accepted 22 June 2012 Associate Editor: Luke Harmon Abstract.—The perciform group Labroidei includes approximately 2600 species and comprises some of the most diverse and successful lineages of teleost fishes.
    [Show full text]