New Urbanism

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

New Urbanism NewNew Urbanism:Urbanism: AnAn IntroductionIntroduction ThisThis presentationpresentation waswas developeddeveloped byby thethe NewNew UrbanismUrbanism DivisionDivision ofof thethe AmericanAmerican PlanningPlanning AssociationAssociation AdditionalAdditional informationinformation providedprovided by:by: Smart Growth America Congress for the New Urbanism Hillsborough County Planning Commission, Tampa APAAPA HasHas aa SmartSmart GrowthGrowth ProjectProject ItIt respondsresponds toto thethe needneed toto reformreform planningplanning andand landland useuse toto makemake greatgreat communitiescommunities happen.happen. NewNew UrbanismUrbanism isis anan importantimportant componentcomponent ofof smartsmart growthgrowth thatthat promotespromotes alternativealternative housinghousing typestypes thatthat manymany peoplepeople prefer.prefer. SmartSmart GrowthGrowth MeansMeans MoreMore HomeHome ChoicesChoices DefinitionsDefinitions SprawlSprawl isis anan excessivelyexcessively lowlow--densitydensity developmentdevelopment pattern,pattern, inin anan unplannedunplanned andand haphazardhaphazard fashion,fashion, requiringrequiring taxtax supportsupport fromfrom existingexisting communiticommunitieses toto extendextend streets,streets, utilities,utilities, services,services, aandnd communitycommunity facilitiesfacilities suchsuch asas schoolsschools toto undevelopedundeveloped land.land. SmartSmart growthgrowth isis wellwell--plannedplanned developmentdevelopment thatthat utilizesutilizes taxtax dollarsdollars effectivelyeffectively andand providesprovides moremore diversitydiversity forfor thethe community.community. TenTen PrinciplesPrinciples ofof SmartSmart GrowthGrowth 1.1. MixedMixed landland usesuses 2.2. CompactCompact buildingbuilding designdesign 3.3. AA rangerange ofof housinghousing opportunitiesopportunities andand choiceschoices 4.4. WalkableWalkable neighborhoodsneighborhoods 5.5. Distinctive,Distinctive, attractiveattractive communitiescommunities withwith aa strongstrong sensesense ofof placeplace 6.6. PreservationPreservation ofof openopen spaces,spaces, farmland,farmland, naturalnatural beauty,beauty, andand environmentalenvironmental areasareas (Smart Growth America) TenTen PrinciplesPrinciples ofof SmartSmart GrowthGrowth 7.7. DevelopmentDevelopment directeddirected towardtoward existingexisting communitiescommunities 8.8. AA varietyvariety ofof transportationtransportation choiceschoices 9.9. Predictable,Predictable, fair,fair, andand costcost effectiveeffective developmentdevelopment 10.10. CommunityCommunity andand stakeholderstakeholder collaborationcollaboration inin developmentdevelopment decisionsdecisions (Smart Growth America) WhatWhat SmartSmart GrowthGrowth “Is”“Is” AndAnd “Is“Is Not”Not” IsIs moremore transportationtransportation IsIs notnot againstagainst carscars andand choiceschoices andand lessless traffictraffic roadsroads IsIs vibrantvibrant cities,cities, IsIs notnot antianti--suburbansuburban suburbs,suburbs, andand townstowns developmentdevelopment IsIs widerwider varietyvariety ofof IsIs notnot aboutabout tellingtelling housinghousing choiceschoices peoplepeople wherewhere oror howhow toto livelive IsIs wellwell--plannedplanned growthgrowth IsIs notnot againstagainst growthgrowth thatthat improvesimproves qualityquality-- ofof--lifelife (Smart Growth America) SprawlSprawl vs.vs. SmartSmart GrowthGrowth (Smart Growth America) HowHow SmartSmart GrowthGrowth WorksWorks BetterBetter EconomyEconomy ResultsResults inin lowerlower publicpublic serviceservice andand transportationtransportation costscosts EmploymentEmployment EnablesEnables betterbetter accessaccess toto jobsjobs andand lowerlower commutecommute timetime EnvironmentEnvironment CausesCauses lessless airair andand waterwater pollution,pollution, andand destroysdestroys fewerfewer farmsfarms andand openopen spacespace EquityEquity EncouragesEncourages moremore affordableaffordable housinghousing andand createscreates betterbetter choiceschoices inin transportationtransportation andand housinghousing EngagementEngagement EncouragesEncourages participationparticipation inin civiccivic lifelife andand supportssupports healthierhealthier andand moremore activeactive residentsresidents ofof allall agesages (Smart Growth America) NewNew UrbanismUrbanism NewNew UrbanismUrbanism landland useuse patternspatterns supportsupport SmartSmart GrowthGrowth GivingGiving PhysicalPhysical ShapeShape toto CommunityCommunity AcrossAcross NorthNorth America,America, andand aroundaround thethe world,world, anan urbanurban designdesign movementmovement calledcalled NewNew UrbanismUrbanism isis improvingimproving thethe wayway ourour citiescities andand townstowns areare built.built. (Congress for the New Urbanism) (Congress for the New Urbanism) GivingGiving PhysicalPhysical ShapeShape toto CommunityCommunity ConventionalConventional developmentsdevelopments areare large,large, singlesingle--useuse placesplaces hostilehostile toto pedestrians.pedestrians. (Congress for the New Urbanism) NewNew UrbanistUrbanist communitiescommunities areare walkablewalkable,, mixedmixed--useuse neighborhoods.neighborhoods. (Congress for the New Urbanism) GivingGiving PhysicalPhysical ShapeShape toto CommunityCommunity NewNew UrbanismUrbanism providesprovides aa rangerange ofof housinghousing choices,choices, fromfrom singlesingle--familyfamily homeshomes withwith yardsyards toto apartmentsapartments overover storefronts.storefronts. TheThe PrinciplesPrinciples ofof NewNew UrbanismUrbanism TheThe principlesprinciples ofof NewNew UrbanismUrbanism areare applicableapplicable toto allall scalesscales ofof community:community: z TheThe Region:Region: Metropolis,Metropolis, City,City, andand TownTown z TheThe Neighborhood,Neighborhood, thethe District,District, andand thethe CorridorCorridor z TheThe Block,Block, thethe StreStreet,et, andand thethe BuildingBuilding (Congress for the New Urbanism) TheThe NeighborhoodNeighborhood ConventionalConventional NewNew UrbanistUrbanist z SetSet backback farfar fromfrom streetstreet z NearNear thethe streetstreet z AutomobileAutomobile--basedbased z PedestrianPedestrian--orientedoriented z GarageGarage inin frontfront z FrontFront porchesporches TheThe NeighborhoodNeighborhood In New Urbanism, each neighborhood has a center z The center should be a public space, whether a square, a green, or an important intersection. z This is used as a public gathering place and as a landmark identifying the neighborhood. (Congress for the New Urbanism) TheThe NeighborhoodNeighborhood QuarterQuarter--milemile fromfrom centercenter toto edgeedge z ForFor mostmost people,people, aa quarterquarter milemile isis aa fivefive-- minuteminute walk.walk. z StoresStores andand services,services, schools,schools, houseshouses ofof worship,worship, andand recreationalrecreational areasareas shouldshould bebe locatedlocated inin thisthis areaarea (Congress for the New Urbanism) TheThe TownTown CenterCenter Diverse,Diverse, walkablewalkable villagesvillages andand towntown centerscenters areare whatwhat distinguishdistinguish NewNew UrbanismUrbanism fromfrom otherother modernmodern developmentdevelopment styles.styles. (Congress for the New Urbanism) TheThe Block,Block, Street,Street, andand BuildingBuilding SpreadSpread outout developmentdevelopment patternspatterns ofof mostmost postpost--warwar suburbssuburbs discouragediscourage walking.walking. (Congress for the New Urbanism) TheThe Block,Block, Street,Street, andand BuildingBuilding NewNew UrbanistUrbanist streetsstreets areare comfortablecomfortable andand interestinginteresting placesplaces forfor peoplepeople toto walkwalk andand meet.meet. z BuildingsBuildings openopen ontoonto sidewalks,sidewalks, ratherrather thanthan parkingparking lots.lots. z WindowsWindows andand doorsdoors facingfacing thethe sidewalksidewalk makemake streetsstreets safer,safer, andand moremore interesting,interesting, forfor everyone.everyone. (Congress for the New Urbanism) TheThe Block,Block, Street,Street, andand BuildingBuilding Conventional ConventionalConventional versusversus NewNew UrbanistUrbanist streetstreet patternspatterns z AmountAmount ofof traffictraffic onon arterialarterial z NumberNumber ofof routeroute choiceschoices z WalkabilityWalkability New Urbanist (Congress for the New Urbanism) ConventionalConventional GrowthGrowth SuburbsSuburbs havehave notnot beenbeen immuneimmune toto decline.decline. z AsAs places,places, theythey oftenoften engenderengender eveneven lessless loyaltyloyalty thanthan olderolder cities.cities. z Today'sToday's suburbssuburbs cancan bebe asas impersonalimpersonal asas thethe graygray citiescities ofof thethe past.past. z TrafficTraffic manymany timestimes provesproves worse.worse. AA SuburbanSuburban AlternativeAlternative SuburbsSuburbs provideprovide fertilefertile groundground forfor thethe NewNew UrbanismUrbanism z InfillInfill projectsprojects z HousingHousing redevelopmentredevelopment z RetrofittingRetrofitting existingexisting commercialcommercial areasareas intointo towntown centerscenters (Congress for the New Urbanism) NewNew UrbanismUrbanism TheThe ChallengeChallenge WhatWhat IssuesIssues NeedNeed toto BeBe Addressed?Addressed? PedestrianPedestrian accessaccess AutomobileAutomobile dependencedependence MixtureMixture ofof buildingsbuildings andand usesuses PedestrianPedestrian AccessAccess DevelopmentDevelopment withoutwithout pedestrianpedestrian amenitiesamenities doesdoes notnot encourageencourage walkingwalking z LackLack ofof sidewalkssidewalks
Recommended publications
  • 1 Title: Suburban Verticalisation in London: Regeneration, Intra-Urban
    Title: Suburban Verticalisation in London: regeneration, intra-urban inequality and social harm Abstract: With the rapid and large scaled expansion of new developments of high rise flats, London’s outer boroughs are seeing a suburban growth not seen since the 1930s. The objective of this mass verticalization are similar to the suburbanisation that occurred in the inter-war period in aiming to provide housing to a growing urban population. However behind the demographic imperative, other economic, socio-cultural and political processes come into play as they did in the past. Considering spatial, social and material transformations, the paper is concerned with a combination of factors, actors, structures and processes in this initial analysis of the new vertical suburbs of London. With this combined perspective, the analysis contributes to critical debates in criminology that are expanding to issues of social harm and social exclusion in the capitalist city. In this paper, I interrogate the fact that an increase of the housing stock only partially addresses the housing crisis in London as the problem of the provision of social housing is becoming increasingly limited under tight budget constraints and a financial structure that relies on and facilitates the involvement of the private sector in the delivery and management of housing. I also question the promises of regeneration solutions through new-build gentrification which have proved ineffective in other urban contexts and should be examined further in the context of London suburbs where the scale of construction is unprecedented and comes to exacerbate inequalities that have long been overlooked when the focus has been on inner boroughs and their gentrification.
    [Show full text]
  • Slum Clearance in Havana in an Age of Revolution, 1930-65
    SLEEPING ON THE ASHES: SLUM CLEARANCE IN HAVANA IN AN AGE OF REVOLUTION, 1930-65 by Jesse Lewis Horst Bachelor of Arts, St. Olaf College, 2006 Master of Arts, University of Pittsburgh, 2012 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2016 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS & SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Jesse Horst It was defended on July 28, 2016 and approved by Scott Morgenstern, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science Edward Muller, Professor, Department of History Lara Putnam, Professor and Chair, Department of History Co-Chair: George Reid Andrews, Distinguished Professor, Department of History Co-Chair: Alejandro de la Fuente, Robert Woods Bliss Professor of Latin American History and Economics, Department of History, Harvard University ii Copyright © by Jesse Horst 2016 iii SLEEPING ON THE ASHES: SLUM CLEARANCE IN HAVANA IN AN AGE OF REVOLUTION, 1930-65 Jesse Horst, M.A., PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2016 This dissertation examines the relationship between poor, informally housed communities and the state in Havana, Cuba, from 1930 to 1965, before and after the first socialist revolution in the Western Hemisphere. It challenges the notion of a “great divide” between Republic and Revolution by tracing contentious interactions between technocrats, politicians, and financial elites on one hand, and mobilized, mostly-Afro-descended tenants and shantytown residents on the other hand. The dynamics of housing inequality in Havana not only reflected existing socio- racial hierarchies but also produced and reconfigured them in ways that have not been systematically researched.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Can Public Procurement Aid The
    Can public procurement aid the implementation of smart specialization strategies? Jon Mikel Zabala-Iturriagagoitiaa*, Edurne Magrob, Elvira Uyarrac, Kieron Flanaganc a.- Deusto Business School, University of Deusto, Donostia-San Sebastian (Spain) b.- Orkestra-Basque Institute of Competitiveness, University of Deusto, Donostia-San Sebastian (Spain) c.- Manchester Institute of Innovation Research, Alliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester (United Kingdom) * Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract In recent decades sub-national regions have become ever more important as spaces for policy making. The current focus on research and innovation for smart specialisation strategies is the latest manifestation of this trend. By putting PPI processes at the core of regional and local development initiatives to support innovation, governments can go beyond priority setting to become active stakeholders engaged in entrepreneurial discovery processes. In this paper we offer a new conceptualization of how such smart specialisation strategies, as an example of a sub- national innovation policy, can help articulate demand for innovation. The paper presents an evolutionary framework that relates regional specialisation processes with the scale and scope of the demand associated to that specialisation. We identify four different roles for governments to be played, depending on the availability of local capabilities and the scale of the chosen priorities: government as a lead user, government as an innovation catalyst,
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Planning Practice in the Age of Transit-Oriented Development by Ian Robinson Carlton a Dissertation Submitted in Partial
    Transit Planning Practice in the Age of Transit-Oriented Development By Ian Robinson Carlton A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in City & Regional Planning in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Daniel Chatman, Chair Professor Robert Cervero Professor Dwight Jaffee Fall 2013 © Copyright by Ian Robinson Carlton 2013 All Rights Reserved Abstract Transit Planning Practice in the Age of Transit-Oriented Development by Ian Robinson Carlton Doctor of Philosophy in City & Regional Planning University of California, Berkeley Professor Daniel Chatman, Chair Globally, urban development near transit stations has long been understood to be critical to transit’s success primarily because it can contribute to ridership and improve the efficiency of transit investments. In the United States in particular, fixed-guideway transit’s land use-shaping capability has been an important justification and goal for transit investment. In fact, today’s U.S. federal funding policies increasingly focus on achieving transit-oriented real estate development near new transit infrastructure. However, the widespread implementation of transit and land use coordination practices has been considered an uphill battle. The academic literature suggests the most effective practice may be for U.S. transit planners to locate transit stations where pre-existing conditions are advantageous for real estate development or transit investments can generate the political will to dramatically alter local conditions to make them amenable to real estate development. However, prior to this study, no research had investigated the influence of real estate development considerations on U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Smart Growth: a Primer
    WHY SMART GROWTH: A PRIMER International City/County Management Association with Geoff Anderson ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We would like to acknowledge the efforts of Geoffrey Anderson of the U.S. Environ­ mental Protection Agency (EPA). Without his assistance this primer would not exist. In addition, Mike Siegel, Gary Lawrence, Don Chen, Reid Ewing, Paul Alsenas, reviewers at the National Association of Counties and the International City/County Management Association (ICMA), and many others provided invaluable suggestions and expertise. A final thank you to Kendra Briechle for helping to pull it all together. About the Smart Growth Network The Smart Growth Network is a coalition of private sector, public sector, and non- governmental partner organizations seeking to create smart growth in neighborhoods, communities, and regions across the United States. Network Partners include the U.S. EPA's Urban and Economic Development Division, ICMA, Center for Neighborhood Technology, Congress for the New Urbanism, Joint Center for Sustainable Communi­ ties, Natural Resources Defense Council, The Northeast-Midwest Institute, State of Maryland, Surface Transportation Policy Project, Sustainable Communities Network, and Urban Land Institute. About the International City/County Management Association ICMA is the professional and educational association for appointed administrators and assistant administrators serving cities, towns, villages, boroughs, townships, coun­ ties, and regional councils. ICMA serves as the organizational home of the Smart Growth Network and runs the Network’s membership program. ICMA helps local governments create sustainable communities through smart growth activities and related programs. For more information on the Smart Growth Network, contact ICMA or visit the Smart Growth Website at http://www.smartgrowth.org.
    [Show full text]
  • BUILDING from SCRATCH: New Cities, Privatized Urbanism and the Spatial Restructuring of Johannesburg After Apartheid
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN AND REGIONAL RESEARCH 471 DOI:10.1111/1468-2427.12180 — BUILDING FROM SCRATCH: New Cities, Privatized Urbanism and the Spatial Restructuring of Johannesburg after Apartheid claire w. herbert and martin j. murray Abstract By the start of the twenty-first century, the once dominant historical downtown core of Johannesburg had lost its privileged status as the center of business and commercial activities, the metropolitan landscape having been restructured into an assemblage of sprawling, rival edge cities. Real estate developers have recently unveiled ambitious plans to build two completely new cities from scratch: Waterfall City and Lanseria Airport City ( formerly called Cradle City) are master-planned, holistically designed ‘satellite cities’ built on vacant land. While incorporating features found in earlier city-building efforts, these two new self-contained, privately-managed cities operate outside the administrative reach of public authority and thus exemplify the global trend toward privatized urbanism. Waterfall City, located on land that has been owned by the same extended family for nearly 100 years, is spearheaded by a single corporate entity. Lanseria Airport City/Cradle City is a planned ‘aerotropolis’ surrounding the existing Lanseria airport at the northwest corner of the Johannesburg metropole. These two new private cities differ from earlier large-scale urban projects because everything from basic infrastructure (including utilities, sewerage, and the installation and maintenance of roadways),
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Growth and Economic Success: Benefits for Real Estate Developers, Investors, Businesses, and Local Governments
    United States December 2012 Environmental Protection Agency www.epa.gov/smartgrowth SMART GROWTH AND ECONOMIC SUCCESS: BENEFITS FOR REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS, INVESTORS, BUSINESSES, AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS Office of Sustainable Communities Smart Growth Program (Distributed at 1/14/13 Sustainable Thurston Task Force meeting) Acknowledgments This report was prepared by the EPA’s Office of Sustainable Communities with the assistance of Renaissance Planning Group under contract number EP-W-11-009/010/11. Principal Staff Contacts: Melissa Kramer and Lee Sobel Mention of trade names, products, or services does not convey official EPA approval, endorsement, or recommendation. Cover photos (left to right, top to bottom): Barracks Row in Washington, D.C., courtesy of Lee Sobel; TRAX light rail in Sandy, Utah, courtesy of Melissa Kramer; Mission Creek Senior Community in San Francisco, California, courtesy of Alan Karchmer and Mercy Housing Inc. (Distributed at 1/14/13 Sustainable Thurston Task Force meeting) Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................ i I. Economic Advantages of Smart Growth Strategies .............................................................................. 1 II. Economic Advantages of Compact Development ................................................................................. 4 A. Higher Revenue Generation per Acre of Land .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Renewal Plan City of Manitou Springs, Colorado
    Manitou Springs East Corridor Urban Renewal Plan City of Manitou Springs, Colorado November 2006 Prepared for: Manitou Springs City Council G:\East Manitou Springs UR Plan1 revised .doc 1 Manitou Springs East Corridor Urban Renewal Plan City of Manitou Springs, Colorado November 2006 Table of Contents Page Section 1.0: Preface and Background 3 Section 2.0: Qualifying Conditions 7 Section 3.0: Relationship to Comprehensive Plan 9 Section 4.0: Land Use Plan and Plan Objectives 10 Section 5.0: Project Implementation 14 Section 6.0: Project Financing 17 Section 7.0: Changes & Minor Variations from Adopted Plan 20 Section 8.0: Severability 21 Attachments Pending Attachment 1: Manitou Springs East Corridor Conditions Survey Findings Attachment 2: El Paso County Financial Impact Report G:\East Manitou Springs UR Plan1 revised .doc 2 MANITOU SPRINGS EAST CORRIDOR URBAN RENEWAL PLAN City of Manitou Springs, Colorado November 2006 Prepared for: Manitou Springs City Council 1.0 Preface and Background 1.1 Preface This East Manitou Springs Urban Renewal Plan (the “Plan” or the “Urban Renewal Plan”) has been prepared for the Manitou Springs City Council. It will be carried out by the Manitou Springs Urban Renewal Authority, (the “Authority”) pursuant to the provisions of the Urban Renewal Law of the State of Colorado, Part 1 of Article 25 of Title 31, Colorado Revised Statutes, 1973, as amended (the “Act”). The administration of this project and the enforcement of this Plan, including the preparation and execution of any documents implementing it, shall be performed by the Authority. 1.2 Description of Urban Renewal Area According to the Act, the jurisdictional boundaries of the Authority are the same as the boundaries of the municipality.
    [Show full text]
  • Doxiadis, from Ekistics to the Delos Meetings
    17th IPHS Conference, Delft 2016 | HISTORY URBANISM RESILIENCE | VOLUME 06 Scales and Systems | Policy Making Systems of City,Culture and Society- | Urbanism and- Politics in the 1960s: Permanence, Rupture and Tensions in Brazilian Urbanism and Development URBAN pLANNING IN GUANABARA STATE, BRAZIL: DOXIADIS, FROM EKISTICS TO THE DELOS MEETINGS Vera Rezende Universidade Federal Fluminense This article looks into the evolution of the Ekistics Theory as formulated by Constantinos A. Doxiadis for the drawing up of a concept of Network. Following the Delos Meetings, this theory, a science of human settlements, subsequently evolved into the idea of human activity networks and how they could apply to different fields, especially architecture and urbanism. Those meeting were held during cruises around the Greek Islands with intellectuals from different areas of knowledge and countries. , Moreover, Ekistics theory was used as a basic for the formulation of the Plan for Guanabara State, Brazil, whose launch in 1964 took place a few months after the first Delos Meeting in 1963. The plan was developed for Guanabara State following the transfer of the country’s capital from Rio de Janeiro to Brasília in 1960. Carlos Lacerda, the first elected governor, invited Doxiadis, hoping that by using technical instruments devised by the Greek architect and by relying on a foreign consultant, the plan would turn the city-state into a model of administration, apart from political pressures. The article highlights the rationality based on the Ekistics, strongly
    [Show full text]
  • Small-Town Urbanism in Sub-Saharan Africa
    sustainability Article Between Village and Town: Small-Town Urbanism in Sub-Saharan Africa Jytte Agergaard * , Susanne Kirkegaard and Torben Birch-Thomsen Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Oster Voldgade 13, DK-1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark; [email protected] (S.K.); [email protected] (T.B.-T.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: In the next twenty years, urban populations in Africa are expected to double, while urban land cover could triple. An often-overlooked dimension of this urban transformation is the growth of small towns and medium-sized cities. In this paper, we explore the ways in which small towns are straddling rural and urban life, and consider how insights into this in-betweenness can contribute to our understanding of Africa’s urban transformation. In particular, we examine the ways in which urbanism is produced and expressed in places where urban living is emerging but the administrative label for such locations is still ‘village’. For this purpose, we draw on case-study material from two small towns in Tanzania, comprising both qualitative and quantitative data, including analyses of photographs and maps collected in 2010–2018. First, we explore the dwindling role of agriculture and the importance of farming, businesses and services for the diversification of livelihoods. However, income diversification varies substantially among population groups, depending on economic and migrant status, gender, and age. Second, we show the ways in which institutions, buildings, and transport infrastructure display the material dimensions of urbanism, and how urbanism is planned and aspired to. Third, we describe how well-established middle-aged households, independent women (some of whom are mothers), and young people, mostly living in single-person households, explain their visions and values of the ways in which urbanism is expressed in small towns.
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook Headings
    School of Environment, Education and Development Planning and Environmental Management MSc Global Urban Development and Planning 2019-2020 Programme Handbook www.seed.manchester.ac.uk/studentintranet ii School of Environment, Education and Development Planning and Environmental Management MSc Global Urban Development and Planning 2019-2020 Programme Handbook www.seed.manchester.ac.uk/studentintranet iii iv Welcome to the School of Environment, Education and Development The School of Environment, Education and Development (SEED) was formed in August 2013 and forges an interdisciplinary partnership combining Geography and Planning and Environmental Management with the Global Development Institute (GDI), the Manchester School of Architecture and the Manchester Institute of Education, thus uniting research into social and environmental dimensions of human activity. Each department has its own character and the School seeks to retain this whilst building on our interdisciplinary strengths. The Global Development Institute (GDI) is a culmination of an impressive history of development studies at The University of Manchester which has spanned more than 60 years and unites the strengths of the Institute for Development and Policy Management (IDPM) and the Brooks World Poverty Institute. IDPM was established in 1958 and became the UK’s largest University-based International Development Studies centre, with over thirty Manchester-based academic and associated staff. Its objective is to promote social and economic development, particularly within lower-income countries and for disadvantaged groups, by enhancing the capabilities of individuals and organisations through education, training, consultancy, research and policy analysis. To build on this tradition, the University created in SEED the Brooks World Poverty Institute, a multidisciplinary centre of excellence researching poverty, poverty reduction, inequality and growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit-Oriented Development and Joint Development in the United States: a Literature Review
    Transit Cooperative Research Program Sponsored by the Federal Transit Administration RESEARCH RESULTS DIGEST October 2002—Number 52 Subject Area: VI Public Transit Responsible Senior Program Officer: Gwen Chisholm Transit-Oriented Development and Joint Development in the United States: A Literature Review This digest summarizes the literature review of TCRP Project H-27, “Transit-Oriented Development: State of the Practice and Future Benefits.” This digest provides definitions of transit-oriented development (TOD) and transit joint development (TJD), describes the institutional issues related to TOD and TJD, and provides examples of the impacts and benefits of TOD and TJD. References and an annotated bibliography are included. This digest was written by Robert Cervero, Christopher Ferrell, and Steven Murphy, from the Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley. CONTENTS IV.2 Supportive Public Policies: Finance and Tax Policies, 46 I INTRODUCTION, 2 IV.3 Supportive Public Policies: Land-Based I.1 Defining Transit-Oriented Development, 5 Initiatives, 54 I.2 Defining Transit Joint Development, 7 IV.4 Supportive Public Policies: Zoning and I.3 Literature Review, 9 Regulations, 57 IV.5 Supportive Public Policies: Complementary II INSTITUTIONAL ISSUES, 10 Infrastructure, 61 II.1 The Need for Collaboration, 10 IV.6 Supportive Public Policies: Procedural and II.2 Collaboration and Partnerships, 12 Programmatic Approaches, 61 II.3 Community Outreach, 12 IV.7 Use of Value Capture, 66 II.4 Government Roles, 14
    [Show full text]