Support for Farmers' Cooperatives Case Study Report the Role of Post-Socialist Production Cooperatives in Bulgaria

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Support for Farmers' Cooperatives Case Study Report the Role of Post-Socialist Production Cooperatives in Bulgaria Support for Farmers' Cooperatives Case Study Report The role of post- socialist production cooperatives in Bulgaria Ivan Boevsky Markus Hanisch Julian Sagebiel The 2011-2012 project „Support for Farmers‘ Cooperatives (SFC)“ has been commissioned and funded by the European Commission, DG Agriculture and Rural Development. Contract Number: 30-CE-0395921/00-42. The SFC project is managed by Wageningen UR’s Agricultural Economics Research Institute LEI and Wageningen University. Project managers: Krijn J. Poppe and Jos Bijman. Other members of the consortium are: • Pellervo Economic Research PTT, Finland: Perttu Pyykkönen • University of Helsinki, Finland: Petri Ollila • Agricultural Economics Research Institute, Greece: Constantine Iliopoulos • Justus Liebig University Giessen, Germany: Rainer Kühl • Humboldt University Berlin, Germany: Konrad Hagedorn, Markus Hanisch and Renate Judis • HIVA Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium: Caroline Gijselinckx • Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, The Netherlands: George Hendrikse and Tony Hak How to cite this report: Boevsky, I., M. Hanisch, and J. Sagebiel (2012). Support for Farmers’ Cooperatives; Case Study Report: The role of post-socialist production cooperatives in Bulgaria. Wageningen: WageningenUR. Disclaimer: This study, financed by the European Commission, was carried out by a consortium under the management of LEI Wageningen UR. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are the sole responsibility of the research consortium and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Commission or anticipate its future policies. Support for Farmers' Cooperatives Case Study Report The role of post-socialist production cooperatives in Bulgaria Ivan Boevsky University of Sofia, Bulgaria Markus Hanisch Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Germany Julian Sagebiel Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Germany November 2012 Corresponding author: Markus Hanisch Humboldt Universität zu Berlin Department for Agricultural Economics Division of Cooperative Sciences Luisenstr. 53 10117 Berlin, Germany E-mail: [email protected] II Preface and acknowledgements In order to foster the competitiveness of the food supply chain, the European Commission is committed to promote and facilitate the restructuring and consolidation of the agricultural sector by encouraging the creation of voluntary agricultural producer organisations. To support the policy making process DG Agriculture and Rural Development has launched a large study, “Support for Farmers’ Cooperatives (SFC)”, in order to provide insights on successful cooperatives and producer organisations as well as on effective support measures for these organisations. These insights can be used by farmers themselves, in setting up and strengthening their collective organisation, by the European Commission, and by national and regional authorities in their effort to encourage and support the creation of agricultural producer organisations in the EU. Within the framework of the SFC project, this case study report on the role of post-socialist production cooperatives in Bulgaria is a collaboration between researchers of the Bulgarian Institute for Agricultural Economics in Sofia and researchers at the Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. Concepts and questionnaires have been developed together. Data collection for this report has been done in the spring of 2012. In addition to this report, the SFC project has delivered 32 other case study reports, 27 country reports, 8 sector reports, 6 EU synthesis and comparative analysis reporst, a report on cluster analysis, a report on the development of agricultural cooperatives in other OECD countries, and a final report. The authors would like to thank the directors and managers of the APCs under study and a list of experts who enriched this report with their comments. III Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1. Analytical framework.................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2. Method of data collection ............................................................................................................................ 3 1.3. Structure of the report .................................................................................................................................. 3 1.4. Brief review of the literature on farm structures .............................................................................. 4 1.4.1. The explanation of Bulgarian farm structures .......................................................................... 4 1.4.2. Micro farms .............................................................................................................................................. 5 1.4.3. Large farms .............................................................................................................................................. 5 1.4.4. Service provision ................................................................................................................................... 8 1.4.5. APCs and their treatment in the “size versus efficiency debate” in agricultural economics .................................................................................................................................................................... 9 2. Description of Case APC 1, Municipality Silistra, North-East Bulgaria ........................................... 12 2.1. Facts & Figures of the APC ....................................................................................................................... 13 2.2. Relevant Support measure affecting structure and strategy ..................................................... 15 2.3. Strategy of the cooperative with regard to the study topic........................................................ 15 2.3.1. Other than agricultural services .................................................................................................. 15 2.3.2 Employment ......................................................................................................................................... 16 2.3.3. Credit ....................................................................................................................................................... 17 2.3.4. Agricultural services and market access .................................................................................. 17 2.3.5. Main Hypotheses/summary .......................................................................................................... 18 3. Description of APC 2, Municipality Yakimovo, North-West Bulgaria .............................................. 19 3.1. Facts & figures of the APC ........................................................................................................................ 19 3.2. Relevant support measure affecting structure and strategy ..................................................... 20 3.3. Strategy of the cooperative with regard to the study topic........................................................ 20 3.3.1. Other than agricultural services .................................................................................................. 20 3.3.2. Employment ......................................................................................................................................... 21 3.3.3. Credit ....................................................................................................................................................... 21 3.3.4. Agricultural services and market access .................................................................................. 21 3.3.5. Main Hypotheses/summary .......................................................................................................... 22 4. Analysis by comparison ...................................................................................................................................... 23 5. Discussion ................................................................................................................................................................. 25 References .......................................................................................................................................................................... 26 Appendices ........................................................................................................................................................................ 29 IV List of Abbreviations APC Agricultural Producer Cooperative EU European Union ESU European Size Unit GDP Gross Domestic Product GVA Gross Value Added NMS New Member States SFC Support for Farmers’ Cooperatives SAPARD Special Accession Programme for Agriculture and Rural Development TKZS Communist Agricultural Productive Cooperative V 1. Introduction Bulgaria entered the European Union (EU) on 1st January 2007. Since the year 2000 growth has accompanied national development with a stagnating period in 2010 and recovery on its way since 2011 (six per cent annual growth from 2004 to 2008, 2011, two per cent). Currently, seven per cent of the country’s labour force is employed in agriculture contributing about five per cent to national gross domestic product (GDP) (Central Intelligence
Recommended publications
  • Treating Two 18Th Century Maps of the Danube in Association with Google-Provided Imagery
    ON THE DIGITAL REVIVAL OF HISTORIC CARTOGRAPHY: TREATING TWO 18TH CENTURY MAPS OF THE DANUBE IN ASSOCIATION WITH GOOGLE-PROVIDED IMAGERY Evangelos Livieratos Angeliki Tsorlini Maria Pazarli [email protected] Chrysoula Boutoura Myron Myridis Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Faculty of Surveying Engineering University Campus, Box 497 GRE - 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece Abstract The great navigable Danube River (known as the Istros River to the Ancient Greeks and as one of the crucial ends of the Roman Empire northern territories) is an emblematic fluvial feature of the overall European historic and cultural heritage in the large. Originating in the German Black Forest as two small rivers (Brigach and Breg) converging at the town of Donaueschingen, Danube is flowing for almost 2850 km mainly eastwards, passing through ten states (Germany, Austria, Slovakia, Hungary, Croatia, Serbia, Romania, Bulgaria, Moldova and Ukraine) and four European capitals (Vienna, Bratislava, Budapest and Belgrade) with embouchure in the west coasts of the Black Sea via the Danube Delta, mainly in Romania. Danube played a profound role in the European political, social, economic and cultural history influencing in a multifold manner the heritage of many European nations, some of those without even a physical connection with the River, as it is the case of the Greeks, to whom the Danube is a reference to their own 18th century Enlightenment movement. Due to Danube’s important role in History, the extensive emphasis to its cartographic depiction was obviously a conditio sine qua non especially in the 17th and 18th century European cartography. In this paper, taking advantage of the modern digital technologies as applied in the recently established domain of cartographic heritage, two important and historically significant 18th century maps of the Danube are comparatively discussed in view also to the reference possibilities available today in relevant studies by the digital maps offered by powerful providers as e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex A, Competitiveness and Economic Growth
    SIESTA Spatial Indicators for a ‘Europe 2020 Strategy’ Territorial Analysis Applied Research 2013/1/18 Draft Scientific Report | Version 10/08/2012 Annex A Competitiveness and Economic Growth ESPON 2013 1 This report presents the draft final results of an Applied Research Project conducted within the framework of the ESPON 2013 Programme, partly financed by the European Regional Development Fund. The partnership behind the ESPON Programme consists of the EU Commission and the Member States of the EU27, plus Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. Each partner is represented in the ESPON Monitoring Committee. This report does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the members of the Monitoring Committee. Information on the ESPON Programme and projects can be found on www.espon.eu The web site provides the possibility to download and examine the most recent documents produced by finalised and ongoing ESPON projects. This basic report exists only in an electronic version. © ESPON & Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 2012. Printing, reproduction or quotation is authorised provided the source is acknowledged and a copy is forwarded to the ESPON Coordination Unit in Luxembourg. ESPON 2013 2 List of authors: Lidia Mierzejewska Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan, Poland ESPON 2013 3 Table of contents 1. Introduction...................................................................... 5 2. Comments on maps.............................................................. 10 2.1. GDP per capita in PPS, 2009.......................................... 10 2.2. Gross Domestic Product per inhabitants in PPS of NUTS 3 regions, 2007-2009..................................................... 16 2.3. Growth measured as GDP variations, 2000-2008................. 24 2.4. Growth measured as GDP per capita. Change 2007-2011..... 30 2.5. Labour productivity at regional level, 2008......................
    [Show full text]
  • Advisory Body Evaluation (IUCN)
    10 I WORLD HERITAGE NOMINATION IUCN TECHNICAL REVI~~ I 1. IDENTIFICATION NUMBER AND NAME 219 SREBARNA NATURE AND BIOSPHERE RESERVE 2. LOCATION: Situated 16 km west of the town of Silistia and 1 km south of I the Danube, in the County of Silistra, village of Srebarna 3. NOMINATED BY: Research and Coordination Centre for Preservation and I Restoration of the Environment 4. DOCUMENTATION: I (i) Nomination form (ii) Supplementary documentation (IUCN) I a) Consultations: Dr. S. Nedialkov; Dr. Z. Kostova; Brian Groombridge. b) Committee on Environmental Protection. 1981. Protected Natural I Sites in1the People's Republic of Bulgaria. Sofia Press, Sofia. c) Institute of Cartography. 1979. Bulgaria Protected Natural Sites. I (Map) • 5. BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY I Srebarna is a fresh-water lake adjacent to the Danube, covering an area of 600 ha. It provides nesting grounds to 99 species of birds and seasonal habitat to an additional 80 species of migratory birds; Srebarna is protected by international legislation, under the Convention on Wetlands of I International Importance (Ramsar Convention). The lake is surrounded by hills which provide a natural boundary and provide an ideal means for I observing the waterfowl (see attached data sheet for additional details). 6. INTEGRITY I The boundaries are clear and explicit; the area is strictly protected (with only carefully-controlled scientific research allowed). The site has been established as a biosphere reserve and a Ramsar site. The site is relatively small, so the quantities of breeding pairs are low and probably I insufficient in themselves to maintain any of the species; only if other areas are also protected can the species be expected to survive.
    [Show full text]
  • Energiile Regenerabile Asociația Română Pentru Transfer Tehnologic Şi Inovare Adresa: Str
    UNIUNEA EUROPEANĂ Innovation, Technology Transfer FONDUL EUROPEAN PENTRU DEZVOLTARE REGIONALĂ GUVERNUL ROMÂNIEI GUVERNUL BULGARIEI Energiile regenerabile Asociația Română pentru Transfer Tehnologic şi Inovare Adresa: Str. Ştefan cel Mare nr. 12, Craiova - instrument pentru prevenirea şi Persoană contact: Gabriel Vlăduţ combaterea schimbărilor climatice, Tel.:/Fax: +40-251-412290; +40-251-418882 E-mail: [email protected]; www.arott.ro creştere economică şi bunăstare socială Investim în viitorul tău! Programul de Cooperare Transfrontalieră România - Bulgaria 2007 - 2013 este cofinanţat de Uniunea Europeană prin Fondul European pentru Dezvoltare Regională Titlul proiectului: Energiile regenerabile - instrument pentru prevenirea şi combaterea schimbărilor climatice, creştere economică şi bunăstare socială Editorul materialului: ARoTT Data publicării: dd.09.2011 Conţinutul acestui material nu reprezintă în mod necesar poziţia oficială a Uniunii Europene www.cbcromaniabulgaria.eu Graniţe comune. Soluţii comune. STUDIU DE OPORTUNITATE PRIVIND CONSTRUIREA UNEI CENTRALE HIDROELECTRICE 2 Studiu de oportunitate privind construirea unei centrale hidroelectrice CUPRINS Capitolul I CADRUL POLITIC ................................................................................................ 7 I.1. Romania ........................................................................................... 8 I.1.1. Statut actual ............................................................................ 8 I.1.2. Resurse hidroenergetice .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • GUIDE of the INTANGIBLE HERITAGE of the Berkovitza Region
    GUIDE OF THE INTANGIBLE HERITAGE of the Berkovitza Region MY UNIQUE BERKOVITZA MOUNTAIN WHERE PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE MEET РЪКОВОДСТВО ПО НЕМАТЕРИАЛНО КУЛТУРНО НАСЛЕДСВО НА БЕРКОВСКИЯ КРАЙ "Mine own Berkovski Balkan constantly casts on my life rebel glares. His bluish contour stands engraved forever in my mind. Sometimes soft and lyrical, another times rebellious and frowning, full of thunders and flooded with heavenly electricity. Wherever I may be, my native place always stays in front of me, crowned with mountains - source of inspiration and sorrow, of uncertainty and courage...." Yordan Radichkov BIG FOOT Berkovitza INTRODUCTION TO INTERGENERATIONAL LEARNING 1 Проектът BIG FOOT 1 Представяне на партньорите 2 ТHЕ BIG FOOT COMMUNITIES 4 Община Губио, Област Умбрия, Италия 4 Община Берковица, област Монтана, България 5 Община Каламбака, област Трикала, Гърция 6 THE BIG FOOT APPROACH IN BERKOVITZA 7 Map of the BIG FOOT Experiments 8 BIG FOOT “EXPERIMENTS” 9 Mount Zdravchenitza 9 Mount Todorini Dolls 11 Mount Kom 17 Детето на Ком 17 The Upper Grove 19 Shtarkovitza peak 19 The Small and the Large Harness 20 The Big Kom 20 Tuzlata 20 Tigancheto 20 Нa Кoм 22 Дървари 23 Lopushna and Zlatitza Valleys 28 Exchange of experience with our Greek Partners 34 ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ НА БЪЛГАРСКИ 36 Клисурски Манастир 36 Тодорини Кукли 38 Тиганчето 49 Конярски Кладенец 49 Лопушански Манастир 52 Връх Ком 58 Циганско Поле - Момина Могила 60 REFERENCES 61 Photo Documents and Maps 62 Картa на Западна Стара планина 67 1 Guide of the Intangible Heritage of the Region of Berkovitza BIG FOOT Berkovitza INTRODUCTION TO INTERGENERATIONAL LEARNING Проектът BIG FOOT Основният способ на BIG FOOT е Отвъд поколения, отвъд планини съчетание на традицията и развитието.
    [Show full text]
  • Fast Delivery
    Delivery and Returns Delivery rates: We strive to offer an unbeatable service and deliver our products safely and cost-effectively. Our main focus is serving our The delivery is performed by a third-party delivery service provider. customers’ needs with a combination of great design, quality products, value for money, respect for the environment and All orders under 20 kg are shipped by courier with door-to-door delivery service. outstanding service. Please read our Delivery terms and details before you complete your order. If you have any questions, we advise that you contact us at 080019889 and speak with one of our customer service associates. All orders over 20 kg are shipped by transport company with delivery to building address service. All orders are processed within 72 hours from the day following the day on which the order is confirmed and given to the courier or transport company for delivery. After the ordered goods are given to courier or transport company for delivery, we will send you a tracking number, which will allow you to check on their website for recent status. The delivery price is not included in the price of the goods. The transport and delivery cots depend on the weight and volume of the ordered items, the delivery area and any additional services (delivery to apartment entrance, etc.). The following delivery pricelist is applied. All prices are in Bulgarian Lev (BGN) with included VAT. 1. Delivery of samples and small 3. Additional service - Delivery to packages door-to-door up to 20 kg. apartment entrance. If you need assistance by us for delivering the goods to your apartment, Kilograms Zone 1 - Zone 11 this is additionaly paid handling service, which you can request by 0 - 1 kg.
    [Show full text]
  • New Species and New Records of Palaearctic Trichoptera in the Material of the Hungarian Natural History Museum
    ANNALES HISTORICO-NATURALES MUSEI NATIONALIS HUNGARICI Volume 102 Budapest, 2010 pp. 65–117 New species and new records of Palaearctic Trichoptera in the material of the Hungarian Natural History Museum J. OLÁH H-4032 Debrecen, Tarján u. 28, Hungary. E-mail: [email protected] – 223 Trichoptera species were determined from the Palaearctic material of the Hungarian Natural History Museum collected in Iran, Pakistan, Kazahstan, and from se- veral countries along the Mediterranean Sea. Fifteen new species are described: Wormal- dia albanica sp.n.(Albania),Pseudoneureclipsis adiabenorum sp.n.(Iran),Pseudoneureclipsis parthus sp. n. (Iran), Tinodes andrasi sp. n. (Croatia), Tinodes urdhva sp. n. (Albania), Rhy- acophila akutila sp. n. (Bulgaria), Rhyacophila liutika sp. n. (Macedonia), Rhyacophila masula sp. n. (Iran), Lepidostoma yuechiorum sp. n. (Kazakhstan), Drusus arbanios sp. n. (Albania), Drusus dacothracus sp. n. (Albania), Drusus illyricus sp. n. (Albania), Drusus mu- ranyorum sp. n. (Greece), Drusus pelasgus sp. n. (Albania) and Notidobia nogradorum sp. n. (Albania) Three species are redrawn: Wormaldia subnigra MCLACHLAN, 1865 (from Albania), Rhyacophila brevifurcata KUMANSKI, 1986 (from Montenegro) and Allogamus auricollis (PICTET, 1834) (from Montenegro). With 76 figures. – Trichoptera, caddisflies, Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, France, Greece, Hungary, Iran, Italy, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Macedonia, Mongolia, Monte- negro, Pakistan, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovenia, Spain, Turkey. INTRODUCTION The recently accessed Palaearctic caddisfly material in the Hungarian Natural History Museum was collected from Iran, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, and from several countries along the Mediterranean Sea. Altogether 223 species were determined and many of them were either not collected at all, or only very rarely after their original descriptions. In materials from poorly studied areas, like Iran, Kazakhstan and Albania thirteen new species were found and described.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex a Competitiveness and Economic Growth
    SIESTA Spatial Indicators for a ‘Europe 2020 Strategy’ Territorial Analysis Applied Research 2013/1/18 Scientific Report | Version 24/12/2012 Annex A Competitiveness and Economic Growth ESPON 2013 1 This report presents the final results of an Applied Research Project conducted within the framework of the ESPON 2013 Programme, partly financed by the European Regional Development Fund. The partnership behind the ESPON Programme consists of the EU Commission and the Member States of the EU27, plus Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. Each partner is represented in the ESPON Monitoring Committee. This report does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the members of the Monitoring Committee. Information on the ESPON Programme and projects can be found on www.espon.eu The web site provides the possibility to download and examine the most recent documents produced by finalised and ongoing ESPON projects. This basic report exists only in an electronic version. © ESPON & Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 2012. Printing, reproduction or quotation is authorised provided the source is acknowledged and a copy is forwarded to the ESPON Coordination Unit in Luxembourg. ESPON 2013 2 List of authors: Lidia Mierzejewska Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan, Poland ESPON 2013 3 Table of contents 1. Introduction...............................................................................5 2. Comments on maps...................................................................9 2.1. GDP per capita in PPS, 2009....................................................9 2.2. Gross Domestic Product per inhabitants in PPS of NUTS3 regions, 2007-2009...............................................................................16 2.3. Growth measured as GDP variations, 2000-2008........................23 2.4. Growth measured as GDP per capita. Change 2007-2011............29 2.5. Labour productivity at regional level, 2008................................36 2.6.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparisons of All-Cause Mortality Between European Countries and Regions: 2020
    Article Comparisons of all-cause mortality between European countries and regions: 2020 Mortality patterns of selected European countries and regions, week ending 3 January 2020 (Week 1) to week ending 1 January 2021 (Week 53) and up to week ending 12 February 2021 (Week 6) for the UK. Contact: Release date: Next release: Annie Campbell and Sion Ward 19 March 2021 To be announced [email protected] +44 (0) 1633 580080 Notice 19 March 2021 Due to a typographical error the title of Figure 4c has been updated to correctly identify Madrid as the city with the highest relative cumulative age-standardised mortality rate across all ages for major cities where data were available. In addition, the links to download the data for charts 1a, 1b, 1c, 4a, 4b and 4c have been updated to provide the full time series of data. We apologise for any inconvenience caused. Page 1 of 31 Table of contents 1. Main points 2. Comparability of the data 3. Relative age-standardised mortality rates in European countries 4. Comparisons of relative age-standardised mortality rate within the UK 5. Relative cumulative age-standardised mortality rates 6. Glossary 7. Data sources and quality 8. Related links Page 2 of 31 1 . Main points Overview of UK excess mortality The UK experienced unprecedented levels of excess mortality during the spring of 2020 and again in the autumn and winter of 2020 and 2021, reflecting the two waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK so far. When looking at 2020, the UK ended the year neither the highest nor lowest in Europe for cumulative excess mortality, but this masks different patterns for the two waves.
    [Show full text]
  • „Геонауки 2019“ “Geosciences 2019” Програма Program
    „ГЕОНАУКИ 2019“ “GEOSCIENCES 2019” ПРОГРАМА PROGRAM Четвъртък, 5 декември, 2019 г. Thursday, December 5, 2019 09.00–10.00 Регистрация Registration 10.00–10.10 Откриване Opening ceremony Евгения Тарасова – Председател на БГД Eugenia Tarassova – President of BGS Поканени пленарни доклади Invited plenary lectures Председател: Евгения Тарасова Chairperson: Eugenia Tarassova 10.10–10.40 Иван Загорчев, Тодор Николов. Българската академия на науките и развитието на геонауките в България Ivan Zagorchev, Todor Nikolov. The Bulgarian Academy of Sciences and the development of geosciences in Bulgaria 10.40–11.10 Тодор Николов, Платон Чумаченко, Божидар Маврудчиев, Малин Иванов. Проф. Петър Бакалов – една звезда при изгрева на бъл- гарската палеонтология (по случай 140 години от рождението му) Todor Nikolov, Platon Tchoumachenco, Bojidar Mavroudchiev, Malin Ivanov. Prof. Petar Bakalov – a star at the rising of Bulgarian palaeon- tology (140 years from his birth) 11.10–11.40 Станислав Василев, Христина Василева. Улавяне и съхранение на CO2 чрез карбонатизиране на пепели от букови стърготини Stanislav Vassilev, Christina Vassileva. CO2 capture and storage by carbonation of beech wood chips ash „ГЕОНАУКИ 2019“ “GEOSCIENCES 2019” 11.40–12.10 Ромео Евтими. Природна или антропогенна е причината за ката- строфалното понижаване на нивото на Преспанското езеро? Romeo Eftimi. The catastrophic decrease of Prespa Lake level – result of natural or anthropogenic reason? 12.10–12.40 Весна Ристич Ваканяц, Боян Хайдин. Условия, проблеми и перс- пективи на водоснабдяването с подземни води в Сърбия Vesna Ristić Vakanjac, Bojan Hajdin. Condition, problems and pros- pects of water supply from groundwater in Serbia 12.40–14.00 Обедна почивка Lunch break Сесия: Хидрогеология и инженерна геология Session: Hydrogeology and engineering geology Председател: Николай Добрев Chairman: Nikolay Dobrev 14.00–14.20 Алексей Бендерев, Асен Митев, Григор Хлебаров, Симеон Вълчев, Иван Василев, Александър Григоров.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 28 Nov 2020
    Issue 28 Nov 2020 eNewsletter CONTENTS Welcome to the newsletter, and thank you as always to contributors for their articles. I think they are a good reflection of the year we have had. They Notices and News ......................... 2 include an article on Tenerife, where an early spring holiday going well fizzled Obituary (Elizabeth Warren).......... 3 out when lockdown restrictions were introduced. There is an article about a EBG Identification Guides ............ 4 Tenerife ........................................ 8 mid-summer holiday in Andalusia, booked pre-Covid and just able to go Portugal ........................................ 14 ahead when restrictions were eased. There are two articles about France: Andalusia, Spain ........................... 17 one contains reminiscences on a lockdown year in Lot, unbroken by the usual Lot, France .................................... 20 return visits to the UK; the other reports on a mid-August visit to Corrèze Moths of Corrèze, France .............. 24 during which some decent moths were caught. There is also a note on the Bulgaria ........................................ 27 Germany ....................................... 29 perils of butterfly photography at a motorway service station in Germany. My own year has followed the same sort of pattern: an exciting trip to Indonesia in January which seems a lifetime away now; then most of the year spent in the UK broken only by a short trip to France in August (which cost me two weeks quarantine). On the positive side however I have greatly enjoyed running a moth trap again after a break of six or seven years; and I succeeded in photographing all 45 species of butterfly which regularly occur in my home county of Hampshire (although I had to cross the border to West Sussex for Clouded Yellow and Wall Brown).
    [Show full text]
  • Bg Schools Catalogue 2010
    BG SCHOOLS CATALOGUE 2010 A guide to GOOD BULGARIAN SCHOOL PARTNERS FOR EUROPEAN EDUCATION PROJECTS Dear Reader, We are proud to present the BG Schools Catalogue 2010. Inside you will find information and valuable contacts of kindergartens, primary, secondary and vocational schools from Bulgaria. They were selected during a national competition for education institutions that are well presented on the Internet. The complete information about the institutions can be found on their websites. Hope you will find suitable partners for future European educa- tion projects. Contents Contents .................................................................................... 1 Aytos .......................................................................................... 3 Blagoevgrad .......................................................................... 4 Bobov dol ................................................................................ 8 Burgas ........................................................................................ 9 Byala .........................................................................................14 Dobrich ...................................................................................15 Draginovo .............................................................................16 Dupnitsa ................................................................................17 Gabrovo ..................................................................................18 Glodzhevo..............................................................................19
    [Show full text]