DOCSLIB.ORG

Romanian Survivor Relief Program 2018-2019 Eligible Regions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Romanian Survivor Relief Program 2018-2019 Eligible Regions Romanian Survivor Relief Program 2018-2019 Eligible Regions ROMANIA – current borders WHICH BOX SHOULD I CHECK? ALL ELIGIBLE. Modern Romania (Box 1) MOLDOVA – CURRENT BORDERS WHICH BOX SHOULD I CHECK? ALL ELIGIBLE. Northern Bukovina and Bessarabia (Box 2) The information herein is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice. This list is not guaranteed to be an accurate or complete representation of the areas eligible for the Romanian Survivor Relief Program. The information is correct to the best of our knowledge and changes in the program guidelines could affect its validity. Rev. 10/15/19 1 BULGARIA Region / Province WHICH BOX SHOULD I CHECK? Dobrich Province - Област Добрич Southern Dobruja (Box 3) Silistra Province - Област Силистра Southern Dobruja (Box 3) UKRAINE – BY OBLAST * * If the listed area is marked “partial,” some of the region is eligible while some of the region is not. For more information, contact the Claims Conference (www.claimscon.org). Oblast/Region Raion/District WHICH BOX SHOULD I CHECK? CHERNIVTSI OBLAST All Districts Eligible. Northern Bukovina and Bessarabia (Box 2) ЧЕРНОВИЦКАЯ ОБЛАСТЬ ODESSA OBLAST All Districts Eligible. SOME DISTRICTS ARE IN BOX 2 AND SOME ОДЕССКАЯ ОБЛАСТЬ DISTRICTS ARE IN BOX 4. Ananyiv Raion Transnistria (Box 4) Ананьевский район Artsyz Raion Northern Bukovina and Bessarabia (Box 2) Арцизький район Balta Raion Transnistria (Box 4) Балтский район Belgorod-Dnestrovskyi Raion Northern Bukovina and Bessarabia (Box 2) Бе́лгород-Днестро́вский район Berezovka Raion Transnistria (Box 4) Березовский район Belyevka (Bilyayivka) Raion Transnistria (Box 4) Беляевский район Bolgrad Raion Northern Bukovina and Bessarabia (Box 2) Болградський район Chornomorsk Municipality Transnistria (Box 4) Чорномо́рськ (Ильичёвск) Frunzovka Raion Transnistria (Box 4) Фрунзовского район Ivanivka Raion Transnistria (Box 4) Ивановский район Izmail Raion Northern Bukovina and Bessarabia (Box 2) Измаильский район The information herein is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice. This list is not guaranteed to be an accurate or complete representation of the areas eligible for the Romanian Survivor Relief Program. The information is correct to the best of our knowledge and changes in the program guidelines could affect its validity. Rev. 10/15/19 2 ODESSA OBLAST All Districts Eligible. SOME DISTRICTS ARE IN BOX 2 AND SOME ОДЕССКАЯ ОБЛАСТЬ DISTRICTS ARE IN BOX 4. Kiliya Raion Northern Bukovina and Bessarabia (Box 2) Килийский район Kodyma Raion Transnistria (Box 4) Кодымский район Kominternivske (Lyman) Raion Transnistria (Box 4) Коминтерновский (Лиманский) район Kotovsk (Podilsk) Municipality Transnistria (Box 4) Котовск (Подольск) район Krasni Okny Raion Transnistria (Box 4) Красноокнянський район Liubashevka Raion Transnistria (Box 4) Любашёвский район Mykolaevka Raion Transnistria (Box 4) Николаевский район Odessa Municipality Transnistria (Box 4) Одесса (город) Ovidiopol Raion Transnistria (Box 4) Овидиопольский район Podilsk Raion Transnistria (Box 4) Подольск район Reni Raion Northern Bukovina and Bessarabia (Box 2) Ренийский район Rozdilna Raion Transnistria (Box 4) Раздельнянский район Sarata Raion Northern Bukovina and Bessarabia (Box 2) Саратський район Savran Raion Transnistria (Box 4) Савранский район Shryayevo Raion Transnistria (Box 4) Ширяевский район Tarutine Raion Northern Bukovina and Bessarabia (Box 2) Тарутинський район Tatarbunary Raion Northern Bukovina and Bessarabia (Box 2) Тарутинський район Teplodar Municipality Transnistria (Box 4) Теплодар (город) Velika Mikhailovka Raion Transnistria (Box 4) Великомихайловский район Yuzhne Municipality Transnistria (Box 4) Южное (город) The information herein is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice. This list is not guaranteed to be an accurate or complete representation of the areas eligible for the Romanian Survivor Relief Program. The information is correct to the best of our knowledge and changes in the program guidelines could affect its validity. Rev. 10/15/19 3 ODESSA OBLAST All Districts Eligible. SOME DISTRICTS ARE IN BOX 2 AND SOME ОДЕССКАЯ ОБЛАСТЬ DISTRICTS ARE IN BOX 4. Zakharovka (Frunzovka) Raion Transnistria (Box 4) Захаровское (Фрунзовского) район MYKOLAIV OBLAST Some Districts Eligible WHICH BOX SHOULD I CHECK? НИКОЛАЕВСКАЯ ОБЛ. or Partially Eligible Arbuzynka Raion* (partial) Transnistria (Box 4) Арбузинский район* (частичный) Berezanka Raion Transnistria (Box 4) Березанский район Domanevka Raion Transnistria (Box 4) Доманёвский район Kryve Ozero Raion Transnistria (Box 4) Кривоозерский район Mykolaiv Raion* (partial) Transnistria (Box 4) Николаевский район* (частичный) Ochakiv Raion Transnistria (Box 4) Очаковский район Pervomaisk Raion* (partial) Transnistria (Box 4) Первомайский район* (частичный) Veselynove Raion Transnistria (Box 4) Веселиновский район Voznesensk Raion* (partial) Transnistria (Box 4) Вознесенский район* (частичный) Vradievka Raion Transnistria (Box 4) Врадиевский район KIROVOGRAD OBLAST Partially Eligible. WHICH BOX SHOULD I CHECK? КИРОВОГРАДСКАЯ ОБЛ. Haivoron Raion* (partial) Transnistria (Box 4) Гайворонський район* (частичный) VINNITSA OBLAST Some Districts Eligible WHICH BOX SHOULD I CHECK? ВІННИЦЬКА ОБЛАСТЬ Or Partially Eligible. Bar Raion* (partial) Transnistria (Box 4) Барский район* (частичный) Bershad Raion* (partial) Transnistria (Box 4) Бершадский район* (частичный) Chechelnik Raion Transnistria (Box 4) Чечельницкий район The information herein is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice. This list is not guaranteed to be an accurate or complete representation of the areas eligible for the Romanian Survivor Relief Program. The information is correct to the best of our knowledge and changes in the program guidelines could affect its validity. Rev. 10/15/19 4 VINNITSA OBLAST Some Districts Eligible WHICH BOX SHOULD I CHECK? ВІННИЦЬКА ОБЛАСТЬ Or Partially Eligible. Chernivtsi Raion Transnistria (Box 4) Черневецкий район Kryzhopol Raion Transnistria (Box 4) Крыжопольский район Mogilev-Podolskyi Raion Transnistria (Box 4) Могилёв-Подольский район Murovane Kurylovtsi Raion* Transnistria (Box 4) (partial) Мурованокуриловецкий район* (частичный) Nemirov Raion* (partial) Transnistria (Box 4) Немирівський район Peschanka Raion Transnistria (Box 4) Песчанский район Shargorod Raion Transnistria (Box 4) Шаргородский район Tomashpol Raion Transnistria (Box 4) Томашпольский район Trostianets Raion* (partial) Transnistria (Box 4) Тростянецкий район* (частичный) Tulchin Raion Transnistria (Box 4) Тульчинский район Tyvrov Raion* (partial) Transnistria (Box 4) Тывровский район* (частичный) Yampol Raion Transnistria (Box 4) Ямпольский район Zhmerinka Raion* (partial) Transnistria (Box 4) Жмеринский район* (частичный) The information herein is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice. This list is not guaranteed to be an accurate or complete representation of the areas eligible for the Romanian Survivor Relief Program. The information is correct to the best of our knowledge and changes in the program guidelines could affect its validity. Rev. 10/15/19 5 UKRAINE – BY DISTRICT / RAION * * If the listed area is marked “partial,” some of the region is eligible while some of the region is not. For more information, contact the Claims Conference (www.claimscon.org). Raion/District Oblast/Region WHICH BOX SHOULD I CHECK? Ananyiv Raion Odessa / Одесская Transnistria (Box 4) Ананьевский район Arbuzynka Raion* (partial) Mykolaiv / Николаевская Transnistria (Box 4) Арбузинский район* (Частичный) Artsyz Raion Odessa / Одесская Northern Bukovina and Bessarabia (Box 2) Арцизький район Balta Raion Odessa / Одесская Transnistria (Box 4) Балтский район Bar Raion* (partial) Vinnitsa / Вінницька Transnistria (Box 4) Барский район* (Частичный) Belgorod-Dnestrovskyi Raion Odessa / Одесская Northern Bukovina and Bessarabia (Box 2) Бе́лгород-Днестро́вский район Belyevka (Bilyayivka) Raion Odessa / Одесская Transnistria (Box 4) Беляевский район Berezanka Raion Mykolaiv / Николаевская Transnistria (Box 4) Березанский район Berezovka Raion Odessa / Одесская Transnistria (Box 4) Березовский район Bershad Raion* (partial) Vinnitsa / Вінницька Transnistria (Box 4) Бершадский район* (Частичный) Bolgrad Raion Odessa / Одесская Northern Bukovina and Bessarabia (Box 2) Болградський район Chechelnik Raion Vinnitsa / Вінницька Transnistria (Box 4) Чечельницкий район Chernivtsi Municipality Chernivtsi / Черновицкая Northern Bukovina And Bessarabia (Box 2) Черновцы (Город) Chernivtsi Raion Vinnitsa / Вінницька Transnistria (Box 4) Черневецкий район Chornomorsk Municipality Odessa / Одесская Transnistria (Box 4) Чорномо́рськ (Ильичёвск) Domanevka Raion Mykolaiv / Николаевская Transnistria (Box 4) Доманёвский район Frunzovka Raion Odessa / Одесская Transnistria (Box 4) Фрунзовского район The information herein is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice. This list is not guaranteed to be an accurate or complete representation of the areas eligible for the Romanian Survivor Relief Program. The information is correct to the best of our knowledge and changes in the program guidelines could affect its validity. Rev. 10/15/19 6 Raion/District Oblast/Region WHICH BOX SHOULD I CHECK? Haivoron Raion* (partial) Kirovograd / Transnistria (Box 4) Гайворонський район* Кировоградская (Частичный) Hertsa Raion Chernivtsi / Черновицкая Northern Bukovina and Bessarabia (Box 2) Герцаевский район Hlyboka
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TEKA Komisji Architektury, Urbanistyki I Studiów Krajobrazowych XV-2 2019
    TEKA 2019, Nr 2 Komisji Architektury, Urbanistyki i Studiów Krajobrazowych Oddział Polskiej Akademii Nauk w Lublinie Revisited the localization of fortifications of the 18th century on the surroundings of village of Braha in Khmelnytsky region Oleksandr harlan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1473-6417 [email protected] Department of Design and Reconstruction of the Architectural Environment, Prydniprovs’ka State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture Abstract: the results of the survey of the territories of the village Braga in the Khmelnytsky region, which is in close prox- imity to Khotyn Fortress, are highlighted in this article. A general description of the sources that has thrown a great deal of light on the fortifications of the left bank of the Dnister River opposite the Khotyn Fortress according to the modern land- scape, is presented. Keywords: monument, fortification, village of Braga, Khotyn fortress, Dnister River Relevance of research Today there is a lack of architectural and urban studies in the context of studying the history of the unique monument – the Khotyn Fortress. Only a few published works can be cited that cover issues of origin, existence of fortifications and it’s preservation. To take into comprehensive account of the specific conservation needs of the Khotyn Fortress, it was necessary to carry out appropriate research works (bibliographic, archival, cartographic, iconographic), including on-site surveys. During 2014−2015, the research works had been carried out by the Research Institute of Conservation Research in the context of the implementation of the Plan for the organization of the territory of the State. During the elaboration of historical sources from the history of the city of Khotyn and the Khotyn Fortress it was put a spotlight on a great number of iconographic materials, concerning the recording of the fortifica- tions of the New Fortress of the 18th-19th centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Investment Proposal (Project) Application Form of GREENFIЕLD
    Investment proposal (project) application form of GREENFIЕLD land lot General information Title of the investment proposal (project) Construction of the recreational complex «Stanchyna» Location (district, city/village, street), land photo, Bahna vil., Vyzhnytsia district, Chernivtsi region scheme of location Owner (owners) Community of Bahna vil. Available documents, that certify the ownership General plan of construction (official act, certificate of ownership) Preliminary cost (balanced cost, assessed value) 100,0 ths. UAH The actual usage Pasture Technical parameters of a land lot Area of the available land lot, ha 45,4 Border surroundings (description, scheme) Borders on the state forestry Level difference on the land lot, m 50 m Cadastral end use Pasture Proposed end use For construction of touristic and recreational center, skiing track Ground-based obstacles (risk of flood and No obstacles landslide, ecological conditions) Underground obstacles (level of surface and No obstacles subterranean waters) Limitations in use (due to construction, ecology According to the requirements of land ownership etc.) and good-neighborly relations Utilities Water (availability, parameters) Distance to the source of fresh water – 250 m Drainage system (availability, parameters) Not available Supplying with gas (availability, parameters) Distance to the gas supplying net – 3,1 km. Electricity (availability, parameters) Distance to the available electrical substation -1 km Availability Ways of communication to the object (autoroads, Automobile gravel
    [Show full text]
  • B Decisão De Execução (Ue) 2017/247 Da
    02017D0247 — PT — 21.10.2017 — 010.001 — 1 Este texto constitui um instrumento de documentação e não tem qualquer efeito jurídico. As Instituições da União não assumem qualquer responsabilidade pelo respetivo conteúdo. As versões dos atos relevantes que fazem fé, incluindo os respetivos preâmbulos, são as publicadas no Jornal Oficial da União Europeia e encontram-se disponíveis no EUR-Lex. É possível aceder diretamente a esses textos oficiais através das ligações incluídas no presente documento ►B DECISÃO DE EXECUÇÃO (UE) 2017/247 DA COMISSÃO de 9 de fevereiro de 2017 relativa a medidas de proteção contra focos de gripe aviária de alta patogenicidade em determinados Estados-Membros [notificada com o número C(2017) 1044] (Texto relevante para efeitos do EEE) (JO L 36 de 11.2.2017, p. 62) Alterada por: Jornal Oficial n.° página data ►M1 Decisão de Execução (UE) 2017/417 da Comissão de 7 de março de L 63 177 9.3.2017 2017 ►M2 Decisão de Execução (UE) 2017/554 da Comissão de 23 de março de L 79 15 24.3.2017 2017 ►M3 Decisão de Execução (UE) 2017/696 da Comissão de 11 de abril de L 101 80 13.4.2017 2017 ►M4 Decisão de Execução (UE) 2017/780 da Comissão de 3 de maio de L 116 30 5.5.2017 2017 ►M5 Decisão de Execução (UE) 2017/819 da Comissão de 12 de maio de L 122 76 13.5.2017 2017 ►M6 Decisão de Execução (UE) 2017/977 da Comissão de 8 de junho de L 146 155 9.6.2017 2017 ►M7 Decisão de Execução (UE) 2017/1139 da Comissão de 23 de junho de L 164 59 27.6.2017 2017 ►M8 Decisão de Execução (UE) 2017/1240 da Comissão de 7 de julho de L 177 45 8.7.2017
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine Grain Ports Outlook - 2018 the History of Grain Is the History of Odessa 2018- Population Sensus 1892
    Ukraine grain ports outlook - 2018 The history of grain is the history of Odessa 2018- Population sensus 1892 1794-1917 1991- 1917 1917 1918-1920 1941-1944 1918 1918-1920 1920-1991 1794-2018 Humble beginnings – but not much change Comparison of cost – America vs Ukraine 1880 America - Ukraine River transport 7 22 Railroad 5 31 Transshipment 3 40 ‘’Kopek’’ per 360 pounds The port of Odessa is of particular disadvantage since only one railway line ties to the interior 1871 – 71% of grain reach Odessa by rail ‘’French Consul Odessa 1907’’ Grain export 1911 Odessa second rail line opens 1913 Odessa-Bakhmach Odessa – 1.6 mill tons Nikolaev – 1.5 mill tons Odessa is the only deep sea port and the other ports Nikolaev and Kherson have Kherson – 1 mill tons To send their grain in barges to Ochakov and Odessa to be loaded onto vessel ‘’United States Consul Odessa 1913’’ 1890 – First Grain Elevator is built 1860 Dreyfuss establish branch in Odessa Inland transport was (still is) a major problem – the cost of There is no roads outside Odessa transporting grain from suburbs of Odessa to port ‘’Italian 1905’’ was same as from Chicago to New York 1 silver penny sterling = 32 wheat grains ‘’French Consul Odessa 1879’’ 1 Sumerian shekel = weight of 180 wheat grains 1 Inch = 3 medium sized barley corns places end to end (2.54 cm) Challenges in 19th Century and today • Lack of Grain Quality control and standards • Poor infrastructure – roads and rail • High inland cost on railroad and lack of capacity • Transshipment rates high versus elsewhere • Buying
    [Show full text]
  • Territorial Structure of the West-Ukrainian Region Settling System
    Słupskie Prace Geograficzne 8 • 2011 Vasyl Dzhaman Yuriy Fedkovych National University Chernivtsi (Ukraine) TERRITORIAL STRUCTURE OF THE WEST-UKRAINIAN REGION SETTLING SYSTEM STRUKTURA TERYTORIALNA SYSTEMU ZASIEDLENIA NA TERYTORIUM ZACHODNIEJ UKRAINY Zarys treści : W artykule podjęto próbę charakterystyki elementów struktury terytorialnej sys- temu zasiedlenia Ukrainy Zachodniej. Określono zakres organizacji przestrzennej tego systemu, uwzględniając elementy społeczno-geograficzne zachodniego makroregionu Ukrainy. Na podstawie przeprowadzonych badań należy stwierdzić, że struktura terytorialna organizacji produkcji i rozmieszczenia ludności zachodniej Ukrainy na charakter radialno-koncentryczny, co jest optymalnym wariantem kompozycji przestrzennej układu społecznego regionu. Słowa kluczowe : system zaludnienia, Ukraina Zachodnia Key words : settling system, West Ukraine Problem Statement Improvement of territorial structure of settling systems is among the major prob- lems when it regards territorial organization of social-geographic complexes. Ac- tuality of the problem is evidenced by introducing of the Territory Planning and Building Act, Ukraine, of 20 April 2000, and the General Scheme of Ukrainian Ter- ritory Planning Act, Ukraine, of 7 February 2002, both Acts establishing legal and organizational bases for planning, cultivation and provision of stable progress in in- habited localities, development of industrial, social and engineering-transport infra- structure ( Territory Planning and Building ... 2002, General Scheme of Ukrainian Territory ... 2002). Initial Premises Need for improvement of territorial organization of productive forces on specific stages of development delineates a circle of problems that require scientific research. 27 When studying problems of settling in 50-70-ies of the 20 th century, national geo- graphical science focused the majority of its attention upon separate towns and cit- ies, in particular, upon limitation of population increase in big cities, and to active growth of mid and small-sized towns.
    [Show full text]
  • (Project) Application Form of GREENFIЕLD Land Lot №1
    Investment proposal (project) application form of GREENFIЕLD land lot №1 General information Title of the investment proposal (project) Construction of a recreational complex «Stanchyany» Location (district, city/village, street), land photo, Chernivtsi region, Vyzhnytsa district, Bagna vil scheme of location Owner (owners) The united territorial community of Vyzhnytsia Available documents, that certify the ownership General plan of construction (official act, certificate of ownership) Preliminary cost (balanced cost, assessed value) 100,0 ths. UAH The actual usage Pasture Technical parameters of a land lot Area of the available land lot, ha 45,4 Border surroundings (description, scheme) Borders with the state forestry Level difference on the land lot, m 50 m Cadastral end use Pasture Proposed end use For construction of tourist and recreation center, skiing track Ground-based obstacles (risk of flood and No obstacles landslide, ecological conditions) Underground obstacles (level of surface and No obstacles subterranean waters) Limitations in use (due to construction, ecology According to requirements of land ownership and etc.) good-neighborly relations Utilities Water (availability, parameters) Distance to the source of fresh water – 250 m Drainage system (availability, parameters) Not available Supplying with gas (availability, parameters) Distance to the gas supplying net – 3,1 km. Electricity (availability, parameters) Distance to the available electrical substation -1 km Availability Ways of communication to the object (autoroads,
    [Show full text]
  • Did Authorities Crush Russian Orthodox Church Abroad Parish?
    FORUM 18 NEWS SERVICE, Oslo, Norway http://www.forum18.org/ The right to believe, to worship and witness The right to change one's belief or religion The right to join together and express one's belief This article was published by F18News on: 4 October 2005 UKRAINE: Did authorities crush Russian Orthodox Church Abroad parish? By Felix Corley, Forum 18 News Service <http://www.forum18.org> Archbishop Agafangel (Pashkovsky) of the Odessa Diocese of the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad (ROCA) has told Forum 18 News Service that the authorities in western Ukraine have crushed a budding parish of his church, at the instigation of Metropolitan Onufry, the diocesan bishop of the rival Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate. The head of the village administration, Vasyl Gavrish, denies claims that he threatened parishioners after the ROCA parish submitted a state registration application. When asked by Forum 18 whether an Orthodox church from a non-Moscow Patriarchate jurisdiction could gain registration, Gavrish replied: "We already have a parish of the Moscow Patriarchate here." Both Gavrish and parishioners have stated that the state SBU security service was involved in moves against the parish, but the SBU has denied this along with Bishop Agafangel's claim that there was pressure from the Moscow Patriarchate. Archbishop Agafangel (Pashkovsky) of the Odessa Diocese of the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad (ROCA) has accused the authorities of crushing a budding parish of his church, in the small village of Grozintsy in Khotin [Khotyn] district of Chernivtsy [Chernivtsi] region, in western Ukraine bordering Romania. "People were afraid of the authorities' threats and withdrew their signatures on the parish's registration application," he told Forum 18 News Service from Odessa on 27 September.
    [Show full text]
  • Epidemiology of Parkinson's Disease in the Southern Ukraine
    — !!!cifra_MNJ_№5_(tom16)_2020 01.07. Белоусова 07.07.Евдокимова ОРИГІНАЛЬНІ ДОСЛІДЖЕННЯ /ORIGINAL RESEARCHES/ UDC 616.858-036.22 DOI: 10.22141/2224-0713.16.5.2020.209248 I.V. Hubetova Odessa Regional Clinical Hospital, Odesa, Ukraine Odessa National Medical University, Odesa, Ukraine Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease in the Southern Ukraine Abstract. Background. Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a slowly progressing neurodegenerative disease with accumulation of alpha-synuclein and the formation of Lewy bodies inside nerve cells. The prevalence of PD ranges from 100 to 200 cases per 100,000 population. However, in the Ukrainian reality, many cases of the disease remain undiagnosed, which affects the statistical indicators of incidence and prevalence. The purpose of the study is to compare PD epidemiological indices in the Southern Ukraine with all-Ukrainian rates. Material and methods. Statistical data of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine, public health departments of Odesa, Mykolaiv and Kherson regions for 2015–2017 were analyzed. There were used the methods of descriptive statistics and analysis of variance. Results. Average prevalence of PD in Ukraine is 67.5 per 100,000 population — it is close to the Eastern European rate. The highest prevalence was registered in Lviv (142.5 per 100,000), Vinnytsia (135.9 per 100,000), Cherkasy (108.6 per 100,000) and Kyiv (107.1 per 100,000) regions. The lowest rates were in Luhansk (37.9 per 100,000), Kyrovohrad (42.5 per 100,000), Chernivtsi (49.0 per 100,000) and Ternopil (49.6 per 100,000) regions. In the Southern Ukraine, the highest prevalence of PD was found in Mykolaiv region.
    [Show full text]
  • Birdwatching Tour
    PIRT “Via Pontica” Birdwatching Tour PROMOTING INNOVATIVE RURAL TOURISM IN THE BLACK SEA BASIN REGION 2014 Table of Contents Birdwatching Sites .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Armenia ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Bulgaria .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Georgia ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 36 Turkey ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 51 Technical Requirements, Issues and Solutions ............................................................................................................................................................ 70 Detailed Itinerary ........................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • GE06 Publication
    BR IFIC Nº 2653 Special Section GE06/36 Date : 22.09.2009 International Frequency Information Circular (Terrestrial Services) Radiocommunication Bureau Date of limit for comments on Part A pursuant to §4.1.2.9 or §4.1.3.1 : 01.11.2009 Date of limit for comments on Part A pursuant to §4.1.4.9: 06.12.2009 Comments should be sent directly to the Administration originating the proposal and to the Bureau. Information included in the columns Column App. Description of columns number 4 1 -- BR identification number 2 B ITU symbol for the administration responsible for the submission 3 1a Assigned frequency 4 Frequency block/Channel number 5 Unique identification code given by the administration for the assignment/allotment (AdminRefId) 6 4b ITU symbol for the geographical area 7 Intent 8 4a Name of the location of the transmitting station/allotment Notice type GS1 – Digital sound (T-DAB) broadcasting assignment GS2 – Digital sound (T-DAB) broadcasting allotment 9 GT1 – Digital television (DVB-T) broadcasting assignment GT2 – Digital television (DVB-T) broadcasting allotment G02 - Analogue television broadcasting assignment 10 Plan entry code 11 Unique identification code for the associated allotment 12 Allotment reference network (RN1-RN6) 13 8BH Maximum effective radiated power of the horizontally polarized component in the horizontal plane (dBW) 14 8BV Maximum effective radiated power of the vertically polarized component in the horizontal plane (dBW) 15 ITU symbols of administrations considered to be affected ITU symbol designating the administration with which coordination has been successfully completed, as indicated by 16 the administration responsible for the submission.
    [Show full text]
  • Between Development and Preservation: Planning for Changing Urban and Rural Cultural Landscapes at Municipal Level
    MANAGEMENT OF HISTORICALLY DEVELOPED URBAN AND RURAL LANDSCAPES IN CENTRAL, EASTERN AND SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE 12th – 14th September 2016, Lednice (Czech Republic) BETWEEN DEVELOPMENT AND PRESERVATION: PLANNING FOR CHANGING URBAN AND RURAL CULTURAL LANDSCAPES AT MUNICIPAL LEVEL Milena Tasheva – Petrova University of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy , Faculty of Architecture, Urban Planning Department Introduction. The Context • 256 Comprehensive Development plans of municipalities (CDPM) to be created by the year 2018 • Landscape –to design and assign territories for implementation of preventive and restorative (The Territorial Management Act) • Landscape – Part of the Strategic Environmental Assessment of the CDPM THE SAMPLE OF THE STUDY: 9 MUNICIPALITIES MUNICIPA LOCATION POPULATION NUMBER AREA Area NUMBER OF SETTLEMENTS LITY (1946, 1985, 2011) [HA] Footprint DZHEBEL SC Region 16 122, 22 851 22 980 47 settlements: Kardzhali Province 8 163 1 town; 46 villages KAVARNA NE Region 16 320 48 136 21 settlements: Dobrich province 1 town; 20 villages KIRKOVO SC Region 22 280 53 787 3 settlements: Kardzhali Province 73 village; 2 v. without population Trans-border R (EL) KOPRIV- SW region 2 475, 3 255 13 887 1 town SHTITCA Sofia Province 2 410 MALKO SE region 10 857, 7 036 79 800 13 settlements: TARNOVO Bourgas Province 3 840 1 town, 12 villages Trans-border R (TR) NIKOPOL NW Region 26 301, 17 785 41 827 14 settlements: Pleven Province 9 305 1 town, 13 villages Trans-border R (RO) OPAN SE Region 2 950 25 747 13 settlements: Stara Zagora Province 13 villages PERNIK SW region, Pernik 59 593, 117 615 48 420 24 settlements: Province 97 181 2 towns and 22 villages TROYAN NW Region 39 701, 45 338 60 243 38 settlements transformed into 22 in Lovetch Province 32 339 2012 MUNICI- PREVAILING NATURAL NATURAL RISK AND HAZARD PROTECTED AREAS PROTECTED AREAS PALITY LANDSCAPES; AV.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Cemetries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine
    Syracuse University SURFACE Religion College of Arts and Sciences 2005 Jewish Cemetries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine Samuel D. Gruber United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/rel Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Gruber, Samuel D., "Jewish Cemeteries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine" (2005). Full list of publications from School of Architecture. Paper 94. http://surface.syr.edu/arc/94 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts and Sciences at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Religion by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JEWISH CEMETERIES, SYNAGOGUES, AND MASS GRAVE SITES IN UKRAINE United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad 2005 UNITED STATES COMMISSION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF AMERICA’S HERITAGE ABROAD Warren L. Miller, Chairman McLean, VA Members: Ned Bandler August B. Pust Bridgewater, CT Euclid, OH Chaskel Besser Menno Ratzker New York, NY Monsey, NY Amy S. Epstein Harriet Rotter Pinellas Park, FL Bingham Farms, MI Edgar Gluck Lee Seeman Brooklyn, NY Great Neck, NY Phyllis Kaminsky Steven E. Some Potomac, MD Princeton, NJ Zvi Kestenbaum Irving Stolberg Brooklyn, NY New Haven, CT Daniel Lapin Ari Storch Mercer Island, WA Potomac, MD Gary J. Lavine Staff: Fayetteville, NY Jeffrey L. Farrow Michael B. Levy Executive Director Washington, DC Samuel Gruber Rachmiel
    [Show full text]