DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Effects on Galaxy Evolution in Nearby Clusters

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

UNIVERSITA' DEGLI STUDI DI MILANO-BICOCCA Scuola di Dottorato di Scienze Corso di Dottorato di Ricerca in Fisica e Astronomia XVIII ciclo UNIVERSITE´ DE PROVENCE AIX-MARSEILLE I Ecole Doctorale "Physique et Sciences de la Mati`ere" Doctorat en Rayonnement et Plasmas A.A.2004-2005 ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ON GALAXY EVOLUTION IN NEARBY CLUSTERS Coordinatore del Dottorato: Prof. Claudio Destri Directeur de l'Ecole´ Doctorale: Prof. Jean-Jacques Aubert Tutore: Prof. Giuseppe Gavazzi Directeur de th`ese: Dott. Alessandro Boselli Commissione-Jury: Dott. A. Boselli (Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille) Prof. V. Buat (Universit´e de Provence) Prof. G. Gavazzi (Universit`a di Milano - Bicocca) Prof. F. Haardt (Universit`a dell'Insubria) Rapporteurs: Prof. C. Balkowski (Observatoire Astronomique Paris-Meudon) Dott. B. Poggianti (Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova) Tesi di Dottorato di: Luca Cortese Matricola R00280 "Objectivity cannot be equated with mental blankness; rather, objectivity resides in recognizing your preferences and then subjecting them to especially harsh scrutiny ...and also in a willingness to revise or abandon your theories when the tests fail (as they usually do)." Stephen Jay Gould Acknowledgments This work represents the end point of my student career. After approximately twenty one years from my first entrance in a class room (it was September 1984 in Phoenix, AZ), I'm finally going to attend my last "school" examination. Therefore I want to seize this opportunity in order to briefly remember and to thank some of the friends met during this journey. First of all I must thank my advisor Peppo Gavazzi, my scientific father, for his precious guidance and his teachings especially at the beginning of my research carrier. Special thanks to Alessandro Boselli, my co-advisor, first of all for the the last year spent in Marseille: a splendid experience. Thanks also for all his helpful advices, comments and supports on this and other works during the last three years. Many people contributed, directly or indirectly, to this work, and I am grateful to all of them. Merci beaucoup to Samuel Boissier for all the interesting discussions and, above all, for his precious lessons of French. Thanks to Veronique Buat for his help during the year spent in Marseille and for having initiated me in the obscure secrets of dust. Thanks to Barry Madore for his hospitality at the Carnegie Observatories, for his kindness, support and, especially, for his help in improving my written English. Muchas gracias to Armando Gil de Paz for his precious help on making the GALEX data available to me: without his contribution a great part of this work would not have been possible. Many thanks to Bianca Poggianti for a careful reading of my thesis and for her useful comments and suggestions. I would like also to thank Monica Colpi for her scientific and, especially, financial support during these three years. Arigato to Tsutomu Takeuchi and Akio Inoue for useful discussions about dust and galaxy evolution, for their kindness and help during my stay in Marseille and for having introduced me to Japanese cuisine. Many friends made the last three years unique. At Milano University life wouldn't have been as much fun without all Peppo's students. In particular thanks to Ilaria, Lea and Paolo for their unique support and thanks also to Chri for having installed Linux on my laptop, making me able to write this work. In Marseille thanks a lot to all the "Caf´e du Coin": Helene, Claude, Kassem, Peter, Fabrice and the others. Thanks for all the coffees and cakes, and for having received me with open arms even if I wasn't able to speak French. Thanks to Alexie, Jean- v vi Baptiste, Hector who shared the office with me, and a special thanks to Celine for having borne my never ending phone calls with my advisors, for her kindness and for her precious help in understanding french bureaucracy. Life in Marseille would have been completely different without the volley matches with Raph, Patrick, Seb, Mika, Fabrice and all the others. Finally, nothing of this would have been possible without the constant support of my parents and my brother Claudio, who have always encouraged me to continue this beautiful adventure. This research was partly supported the Universit`a Italo-Francese through the Vinci Programme and by the CNES through GALEX-Marseille. Abstract The environmental effects on galaxy evolution in nearby clusters are investigated using a multiwavelength dataset. The present analysis is focused on the properties of three (Abell 1367, Virgo and Coma) among the best studied clusters in the local Universe. Due to the variety of their environmental conditions (e.g. spiral fraction, X-ray luminosity, evolutionary stage) they represent the most suitable "laboratory" for comparative studies. By combining for the first time GALEX UV observations with optical, near and far infrared data, the evolutionary history of cluster galaxies is studied. The main goals of this thesis are: (a) The study of the dependence of the UV emission of galaxies from their morphological type, mass and the environment they inhabit, through the study of UV luminosity functions and color magnitude relations. (b) The study of UV dust extinction properties of local cluster galaxies and investigation of possible empirical relations useful to estimate the amount of UV attenuation in local and high redshift galaxies. (c) Investigation of the effect of large scale structures assembling on galaxy evolution through the dynamical analysis of Abell 1367, one of the best examples of a dynamically young local cluster of galaxies. (d) The characterization of the effects of different environmental mechanisms (i.e. gravitation interactions, ram pressure, preprocessing) on the evolutionary history of cluster galaxies in order to gain more insight on the origin of the morphology-density and star-formation-density relations. The observational evidences presented in this work suggest that: (I) Giant ellipticals are an old, homogeneous population showing no or little evolution at least in the past 8 Gyr; unlike dwarf ellipticals which still contain young stellar populations. (II) The importance of different environmental mechanisms has changed during the age of the Universe. Tidal interactions and preprocessing probably dominated the past Universe and shaped part of the morphology-density relation during the phase of cluster accretion of small groups. Ram pressure dominates in today clusters and is surely affecting the star formation history of galaxies but with less influence on their morphology. (III) The heterogeneous class of S0s galaxies, from bulge dominated to the disky S0s, is not the result of a single transformation mechanism: if ram pressure is able to produce disk dominated S0s, tidal interactions (and thus preprocessing) are required to account for bulge dominated S0s. (VI) Different observational evidences vii viii confirm the presence of a correlation between the mean age of stellar populations and galaxy mass (downsizing effect). In the framework of the hierarchical model of galaxy formation, the origin of the downsizing effect remains unsolved. This clear observational evidences represents one of today's main challenge for models of galaxy evolution. Riassunto In questo lavoro vengono analizzati gli effetti dell'ambiente sull'evoluzione delle galassie, utilizzando una base di dati multi-lunghezza d'onda. In particolare tutta quest'analisi ´e focalizzata sullo studio di tre differenti ammassi di galassie dell'Universo Locale: Abell1367, Virgo, Coma. Questi tre ammassi sono tra i piu´ studiati nell'Universo locale e, date le loro differenti propriet´a (e.g. frazione di galassie a spirale, luminosit´a X, stadio evolutivo), rappresentano dei laboratori ideali per quantificare l’influenza dell'ambiente sull'evoluzione delle galassie. Combinando per la prima volta osser- vazioni ultraviolette del satellite GALEX a dati ottici, in vicino e lontano infrarosso viene ricostruita l'evoluzione delle galassie d'ammasso. I principali obiettivi di questa tesi sono: (a) Studiare il legame tra le propriet´a dell'emissione UV delle galassie, il loro tipo morfologico, la loro massa e l'ambiente in cui esse si trovano, attraverso l'analisi delle funzioni di luminosit´a UV e delle relazioni colore-magnitudine. (b) Comprendere le propriet´a delle polveri interstellari respon- sabili dell'assorbimento della radiazione ultravioletta e ricavare relazioni empiriche utili per poter quantificare l'assorbimento della radiazione ultravioletta in assenza di osservazioni in lontano infrarosso. (c) Analizzare se e come lo stato dinamico di un ammasso ´e in grado di influenzare la storia evolutiva delle galassie, attraverso lo studio dell'ammasso di Abell1367: uno dei migliori esempi di ammasso locale, dinami- camente ancora giovane. (d) Quantificare l’influenza di diversi effetti d'ambiente (i.e. interazioni gravitazionali, ram-pressure, galaxy preprocessing) sull'evoluzione delle galassie d'ammasso, in modo da comprendere le origini del fenomeno di segregazione morfologica. Tutte le evidenze osservative presentate e analizzate in questo lavoro suggeriscono che: (I) Le ellittiche giganti rappresentano una popolazione vecchia, omogenea che non ha subito una significativa evoluzione negli ultimi 8 Gyr; al contrario dell'ellittiche nane che sono ancora oggi dominate da popolazioni stellari giovani. (II) L’influenza dell'ambiente sull'evoluzione delle galassie cambia sensibilmente con l’et´a dell'Universo. Le interazioni gravitazionali ed il galaxy preprocessing sono stati gli effetti dominanti nell'Universo passato e sembrano essere i responsabili, almeno in parte, del fenomeno di segregazione morfologica. La ram pressure sembra essere dominante negli ammassi di oggi. Questo meccanismo ´e sicuramente in grado di influenzare la storia di for- ix x mazione stellare delle galassie, ma ha pochi effetti sulla loro morfologia. (III) Le galassie lenticolari (S0) risultano essere cos´ı il prodotto di processi completamente differenti: se oggi la ram pressure ´e in grado di trasformare una galassia a spirale in una lenticolare con piccolo bulge, sono necessarie interazioni gravitazionali per pro- durre i grandi bulge osservati in molte lenticolari nell'Universo locale.
Recommended publications
  • University of Iowa Instruments in Space

    University of Iowa Instruments in Space

    University of Iowa Instruments in Space A-D13-089-5 Wind Van Allen Probes Cluster Mercury Earth Venus Mars Express HaloSat MMS Geotail Mars Voyager 2 Neptune Uranus Juno Pluto Jupiter Saturn Voyager 1 Spaceflight instruments designed and built at the University of Iowa in the Department of Physics & Astronomy (1958-2019) Explorer 1 1958 Feb. 1 OGO 4 1967 July 28 Juno * 2011 Aug. 5 Launch Date Launch Date Launch Date Spacecraft Spacecraft Spacecraft Explorer 3 (U1T9)58 Mar. 26 Injun 5 1(U9T68) Aug. 8 (UT) ExpEloxrpelro r1e r 4 1915985 8F eJbu.l y1 26 OEGxOpl o4rer 41 (IMP-5) 19697 Juunlye 2 281 Juno * 2011 Aug. 5 Explorer 2 (launch failure) 1958 Mar. 5 OGO 5 1968 Mar. 4 Van Allen Probe A * 2012 Aug. 30 ExpPloiorenre 3er 1 1915985 8M Oarc. t2. 611 InEjuxnp lo5rer 45 (SSS) 197618 NAouvg.. 186 Van Allen Probe B * 2012 Aug. 30 ExpPloiorenre 4er 2 1915985 8Ju Nlyo 2v.6 8 EUxpKlo 4r e(rA 4ri1el -(4IM) P-5) 197619 DJuenc.e 1 211 Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission / 1 * 2015 Mar. 12 ExpPloiorenre 5e r 3 (launch failure) 1915985 8A uDge.c 2. 46 EPxpiolonreeerr 4130 (IMP- 6) 19721 Maarr.. 313 HMEaRgCnIe CtousbpeShaetr i(cF oMxu-1ltDis scaatelell itMe)i ssion / 2 * 2021081 J5a nM. a1r2. 12 PionPeioenr e1er 4 1915985 9O cMt.a 1r.1 3 EExpxlpolorerer r4 457 ( S(IMSSP)-7) 19721 SNeopvt.. 1263 HMaalogSnaett oCsupbhee Sriact eMlluitlet i*scale Mission / 3 * 2021081 M5a My a2r1. 12 Pioneer 2 1958 Nov. 8 UK 4 (Ariel-4) 1971 Dec. 11 Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission / 4 * 2015 Mar.
  • Photographs Written Historical and Descriptive

    Photographs Written Historical and Descriptive

    CAPE CANAVERAL AIR FORCE STATION, MISSILE ASSEMBLY HAER FL-8-B BUILDING AE HAER FL-8-B (John F. Kennedy Space Center, Hanger AE) Cape Canaveral Brevard County Florida PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD SOUTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 100 Alabama St. NW Atlanta, GA 30303 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD CAPE CANAVERAL AIR FORCE STATION, MISSILE ASSEMBLY BUILDING AE (Hangar AE) HAER NO. FL-8-B Location: Hangar Road, Cape Canaveral Air Force Station (CCAFS), Industrial Area, Brevard County, Florida. USGS Cape Canaveral, Florida, Quadrangle. Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinates: E 540610 N 3151547, Zone 17, NAD 1983. Date of Construction: 1959 Present Owner: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Present Use: Home to NASA’s Launch Services Program (LSP) and the Launch Vehicle Data Center (LVDC). The LVDC allows engineers to monitor telemetry data during unmanned rocket launches. Significance: Missile Assembly Building AE, commonly called Hangar AE, is nationally significant as the telemetry station for NASA KSC’s unmanned Expendable Launch Vehicle (ELV) program. Since 1961, the building has been the principal facility for monitoring telemetry communications data during ELV launches and until 1995 it processed scientifically significant ELV satellite payloads. Still in operation, Hangar AE is essential to the continuing mission and success of NASA’s unmanned rocket launch program at KSC. It is eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) under Criterion A in the area of Space Exploration as Kennedy Space Center’s (KSC) original Mission Control Center for its program of unmanned launch missions and under Criterion C as a contributing resource in the CCAFS Industrial Area Historic District.
  • Acceleration of Particles to High Energies in Earth's Radiation Belts

    Acceleration of Particles to High Energies in Earth's Radiation Belts

    Space Sci Rev (2012) 173:103–131 DOI 10.1007/s11214-012-9941-x Acceleration of Particles to High Energies in Earth’s Radiation Belts R.M. Millan · D.N. Baker Received: 16 April 2012 / Accepted: 30 September 2012 / Published online: 25 October 2012 © The Author(s) 2012. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Discovered in 1958, Earth’s radiation belts persist in being mysterious and un- predictable. This highly dynamic region of near-Earth space provides an important natural laboratory for studying the physics of particle acceleration. Despite the proximity of the ra- diation belts to Earth, many questions remain about the mechanisms responsible for rapidly energizing particles to relativistic energies there. The importance of understanding the ra- diation belts continues to grow as society becomes increasingly dependent on spacecraft for navigation, weather forecasting, and more. We review the historical underpinning and observational basis for our current understanding of particle acceleration in the radiation belts. Keywords Particle acceleration · Radiation belts · Magnetosphere 1 Introduction 1.1 Motivation Shortly after the discovery of Earth’s radiation belts, the suggestion was put forward that processes occurring locally, in near-Earth space, might be responsible for the high energy particles observed there. Efforts were also carried out to search for an external source that could inject multi-MeV electrons into Earth’s inner magnetosphere where they could then be trapped by the magnetic field. Energetic electrons are in fact observed in interplanetary space, originating at both Jupiter and the sun. However, the electron intensity in Earth’s radiation belts is not correlated with the interplanetary intensity, and a significant external R.M.
  • <> CRONOLOGIA DE LOS SATÉLITES ARTIFICIALES DE LA

    <> CRONOLOGIA DE LOS SATÉLITES ARTIFICIALES DE LA

    1 SATELITES ARTIFICIALES. Capítulo 5º Subcap. 10 <> CRONOLOGIA DE LOS SATÉLITES ARTIFICIALES DE LA TIERRA. Esta es una relación cronológica de todos los lanzamientos de satélites artificiales de nuestro planeta, con independencia de su éxito o fracaso, tanto en el disparo como en órbita. Significa pues que muchos de ellos no han alcanzado el espacio y fueron destruidos. Se señala en primer lugar (a la izquierda) su nombre, seguido de la fecha del lanzamiento, el país al que pertenece el satélite (que puede ser otro distinto al que lo lanza) y el tipo de satélite; este último aspecto podría no corresponderse en exactitud dado que algunos son de finalidad múltiple. En los lanzamientos múltiples, cada satélite figura separado (salvo en los casos de fracaso, en que no llegan a separarse) pero naturalmente en la misma fecha y juntos. NO ESTÁN incluidos los llevados en vuelos tripulados, si bien se citan en el programa de satélites correspondiente y en el capítulo de “Cronología general de lanzamientos”. .SATÉLITE Fecha País Tipo SPUTNIK F1 15.05.1957 URSS Experimental o tecnológico SPUTNIK F2 21.08.1957 URSS Experimental o tecnológico SPUTNIK 01 04.10.1957 URSS Experimental o tecnológico SPUTNIK 02 03.11.1957 URSS Científico VANGUARD-1A 06.12.1957 USA Experimental o tecnológico EXPLORER 01 31.01.1958 USA Científico VANGUARD-1B 05.02.1958 USA Experimental o tecnológico EXPLORER 02 05.03.1958 USA Científico VANGUARD-1 17.03.1958 USA Experimental o tecnológico EXPLORER 03 26.03.1958 USA Científico SPUTNIK D1 27.04.1958 URSS Geodésico VANGUARD-2A
  • Index of Astronomia Nova

    Index of Astronomia Nova

    Index of Astronomia Nova Index of Astronomia Nova. M. Capderou, Handbook of Satellite Orbits: From Kepler to GPS, 883 DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-03416-4, © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 Bibliography Books are classified in sections according to the main themes covered in this work, and arranged chronologically within each section. General Mechanics and Geodesy 1. H. Goldstein. Classical Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, Mass., 1956 2. L. Landau & E. Lifchitz. Mechanics (Course of Theoretical Physics),Vol.1, Mir, Moscow, 1966, Butterworth–Heinemann 3rd edn., 1976 3. W.M. Kaula. Theory of Satellite Geodesy, Blaisdell Publ., Waltham, Mass., 1966 4. J.-J. Levallois. G´eod´esie g´en´erale, Vols. 1, 2, 3, Eyrolles, Paris, 1969, 1970 5. J.-J. Levallois & J. Kovalevsky. G´eod´esie g´en´erale,Vol.4:G´eod´esie spatiale, Eyrolles, Paris, 1970 6. G. Bomford. Geodesy, 4th edn., Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1980 7. J.-C. Husson, A. Cazenave, J.-F. Minster (Eds.). Internal Geophysics and Space, CNES/Cepadues-Editions, Toulouse, 1985 8. V.I. Arnold. Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, Graduate Texts in Mathematics (60), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989 9. W. Torge. Geodesy, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1991 10. G. Seeber. Satellite Geodesy, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1993 11. E.W. Grafarend, F.W. Krumm, V.S. Schwarze (Eds.). Geodesy: The Challenge of the 3rd Millennium, Springer, Berlin, 2003 12. H. Stephani. Relativity: An Introduction to Special and General Relativity,Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004 13. G. Schubert (Ed.). Treatise on Geodephysics,Vol.3:Geodesy, Elsevier, Oxford, 2007 14. D.D. McCarthy, P.K.
  • 2010 Mad River Canoe Is a Registered Trademark of Confluence Watersports

    2010 Mad River Canoe Is a Registered Trademark of Confluence Watersports

    he story of Mad River Canoe begins in a patch of ferns, oh so long ago, with friend Rabbit. TNative American legend has it that Rabbit was a great hunter and a bit of a trickster, but most of all Rabbit was confident in his abilities. So confident in fact, that even as Lynx circles the fern, planning his attack, Rabbit is free to enjoy his pipe, secure in his abilities to avoid this mortal enemy. Within every legend, there is truth. And the truth in the legend of Rabbit is that confidence is a powerful asset when backed up by ability. The confidence you share with your Mad River Canoe will be backed up by our ability to produce the finest craft of its kind. We like to think that every Mad River Canoe is crafted from both truth and legend. For legends inspire us toward greatness, yet only through truth can we achieve it. I n n ova t e t h e n. O ur story continues on a picturesque hillside in Vermont, circa: 1971. In his backyard shed, Jim henry, the company founder, began his mission to build a better canoe through innovative thought, design and materials. With confidence in his abilities, he designed and built the first Malacite. he then raced in – and won – the downriver national Championship and the rest, you know. Word spread and demand grew. A tradition of innovation was born. From the beginning, Mad river Canoe explored new designs and experimented with new materials. We were the first to introduce Kevlar™ to the canoe industry and among the pioneers truth & legend to first mold our own royalex canoes.
  • 2009 Product Catalog the Story of Mad River Canoe Begins in a Patch of Ferns, Oh So Long Ago, with Friend Rabbit

    2009 Product Catalog the Story of Mad River Canoe Begins in a Patch of Ferns, Oh So Long Ago, with Friend Rabbit

    2009 Product Catalog The story of Mad River Canoe begins in a patch of ferns, oh so long ago, with friend Rabbit. Native American legend has it that Rabbit was a great hunter and a bit of a trickster, but most of all Rabbit was confident in his abilities. So confident in fact, that even as Lynx circles the fern, planning his attack, Rabbit is free to enjoy his pipe, secure in his abilities to avoid this mortal enemy. TRUTH & LEGEND Within every legend, there is truth. And the truth in the legend of Rabbit is that confidence is a powerful asset when backed up by ability. The confidence you share with your Mad River Canoe will be backed up by our ability to produce the finest craft of its kind. We like to think that every Mad River Canoe is crafted from both truth and legend. For legends inspire us toward greatness, yet only through truth can we achieve it. Cover Photo: Joshua Compton among the pioneers to first mold our own Royalex® canoes. We now offer a wider variety of hull designs than any other canoe manufacturer and continue to push ourselves and our designs to new levels of performance. Our efforts have been rewarded with competitions won, accolades earned (including 3 “Manufacturer of the Year” awards from Canoe & Kayak magazine) and, most importantly, a growing base of loyal customers. After more than 35 years in this industry, we have never lost sight of our founder’s original mission to build a better canoe. Our devotion to that ideal is not INNOVatE thEN.
  • Device Explorer Firmware Download to the Device V1.2

    Device Explorer Firmware Download to the Device V1.2

    Operating instruction manual Device Explorer Firmware download to the device V1.2 Hilscher Gesellschaft für Systemautomation mbH www.hilscher.com DOC190302OI01EN | Revision 1 | English | 2020-02 | Released | Public Table of contents 2/51 Table of contents 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 4 1.1 About the user manual ..................................................................................................... 4 1.2 List of revisions ................................................................................................................ 4 2 Installation ................................................................................................................................ 5 2.1 Requirements and prerequisites ...................................................................................... 5 2.2 Installation instructions..................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Uninstallation.................................................................................................................. 10 3 Device Explorer...................................................................................................................... 11 3.1 Program start ................................................................................................................. 11 3.2 Overview of the user interface ......................................................................................
  • 177-/L.7 S- -,---- I ,S -5-- 5- - -5 —2

    177-/L.7 S- -,---- I ,S -5-- 5- - -5 —2

    X-601-72-487 PREPRINT A MODEL OF THE STARFISH FLUX IN THE INNER RADIATION ZONE U U: ULU TURN TO UBRAR'! M. J. TEAGUE E. G. STASSINOPOULOS DECEMBER 1972 GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER GREENBELT, MARYLAND 25 7J RESEARCH & Ii • T. LC.3 177-/l.7 S- -,---- I ,S -5-- 5- - -5 —2 5-Y --T• T S.- SS_ - : : ;- / - - - — -5- - -- - - --- - - - - - - - / - - c -- - - - - - '--.- - - -- - _ -- - ,- - -• .. Al 5---- -f -- -- _z 5- - - - - - - --5- -z - - - -'7 - - - / 5- 5 -- - - - - - 5- - -- - .5, 5- - -- -5- _-f k - - ------- --- - -'---- - 5-'- -"c-- - c - 7- - -- Si i- - r ---- ____.__5: ------ -- - - -- - : 15-- - -- _ - - - - - - -5•E - - - - --SS -• — ._---S - -- -- 5--- 5- '- . -. - 5-. - - - - 1-. -- __- 7-- 5-1-• '2 2 - - 4 - r X-601-72-487 PREPRINT A MODEL OF THE STARFISH FLUX IN THE INNER RADIATION ZONE by Michael J. Teague The KMS Technology Center and E. G. Stassinopoulos National Space Science Data Center National Space Science Data Center National Aeronautics and Space Administration Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland 20771 December 1972 Page intentionally left blank Page intentionally left blank A MODEL OF THE STARFISH FLUX IN THE INNER RADIATION ZONE by Michael J. Teague The KNS Technology Center and E. G. Stassinopoulos National Space Science Data Center ABSTRACT A model of the Starfish electrons injected into the radiation belt in July 1962 has been determined for epoch September 1964. This model distinguishes be- tween artificial and natural electrons and provides the artificial unidirectional electron flax as a function of equatorial pitch angle, energy, and L value. The model is based primarily upon data from the OCO 1, OGO 3, OGO 5, 1963-38C, and the OV3-3 satellites.
  • Our First Quarter Century of Achievement ... Just the Beginning I

    Our First Quarter Century of Achievement ... Just the Beginning I

    NASA Press Kit National Aeronautics and 251hAnniversary October 1983 Space Administration 1958-1983 >\ Our First Quarter Century of Achievement ... Just the Beginning i RELEASE ND: 83-132 September 1983 NOTE TO EDITORS : NASA is observing its 25th anniversary. The space agency opened for business on Oct. 1, 1958. The information attached sumnarizes what has been achieved in these 25 years. It was prepared as an aid to broadcasters, writers and editors who need historical, statistical and chronological material. Those needing further information may call or write: NASA Headquarters, Code LFD-10, News and Information Branch, Washington, D. C. 20546; 202/755-8370. Photographs to illustrate any of this material may be obtained by calling or writing: NASA Headquarters, Code LFD-10, Photo and Motion Pictures, Washington, D. C. 20546; 202/755-8366. bQy#qt&*&Mary G. itzpatrick Acting Chief, News and Information Branch Public Affairs Division Cover Art Top row, left to right: ffComnandDestruct Center," 1967, Artist Paul Calle, left; ?'View from Mimas," 1981, features on a Saturnian satellite, by Artist Ron Miller, center; ftP1umes,*tSTS- 4 launch, Artist Chet Jezierski,right; aeronautical research mural, Artist Bob McCall, 1977, on display at the Visitors Center at Dryden Flight Research Facility, Edwards, Calif. iii OUR FIRST QUARTER CENTER OF ACHIEVEMENT A-1 -3 SPACE FLIGHT B-1 - 19 SPACE SCIENCE c-1 - 20 SPACE APPLICATIQNS D-1 - 12 AERONAUTICS E-1 - 10 TRACKING AND DATA ACQUISITION F-1 - 5 INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMS G-1 - 5 TECHNOLOGY UTILIZATION H-1 - 5 NASA INSTALLATIONS 1-1 - 9 NASA LAUNCH RECORD J-1 - 49 ASTRONAUTS K-1 - 13 FINE ARTS PRQGRAM L-1 - 7 S IGN I F ICANT QUOTAT IONS frl-1 - 4 NASA ADvIINISTRATORS N-1 - 7 SELECTED NASA PHOTOGRAPHS 0-1 - 12 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, D.C.
  • NASA Is Not Archiving All Potentially Valuable Data

    NASA Is Not Archiving All Potentially Valuable Data

    ‘“L, United States General Acchunting Office \ Report to the Chairman, Committee on Science, Space and Technology, House of Representatives November 1990 SPACE OPERATIONS NASA Is Not Archiving All Potentially Valuable Data GAO/IMTEC-91-3 Information Management and Technology Division B-240427 November 2,199O The Honorable Robert A. Roe Chairman, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: On March 2, 1990, we reported on how well the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) managed, stored, and archived space science data from past missions. This present report, as agreed with your office, discusses other data management issues, including (1) whether NASA is archiving its most valuable data, and (2) the extent to which a mechanism exists for obtaining input from the scientific community on what types of space science data should be archived. As arranged with your office, unless you publicly announce the contents of this report earlier, we plan no further distribution until 30 days from the date of this letter. We will then give copies to appropriate congressional committees, the Administrator of NASA, and other interested parties upon request. This work was performed under the direction of Samuel W. Howlin, Director for Defense and Security Information Systems, who can be reached at (202) 275-4649. Other major contributors are listed in appendix IX. Sincerely yours, Ralph V. Carlone Assistant Comptroller General Executive Summary The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is respon- Purpose sible for space exploration and for managing, archiving, and dissemi- nating space science data. Since 1958, NASA has spent billions on its space science programs and successfully launched over 260 scientific missions.

  • Fall 2020 Explorer Magazine

    UMKC School of Dentistry Alumni News Fall 2020 Vol. 77 No. 2 Ready for the future Amid uncertain times, the school and profession make plans for a promising future contents message from the interim dean UMKC School of Dentistry Alumni News Features 8 The global pandemic has shifted many plans for the future and the dental profession is no different. We catch up with industry Explorer is published twice each year for alumni leaders (including our alumni, and friends of the University of Missouri-Kansas I AM TRULY HONORED to serve as interim dean of the of course) to get a glimpse into City School of Dentistry. UMKC is an equal School of Dentistry. For several years, I have taught in the opportunity, affirmative action, ADA institution. what the future holds. We also dental curriculum and facilitated various interprofessional learn that those preparing our INTERIM DEAN, SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY education activities, allowing me to see firsthand how future dental professionals are Russell B. Melchert, Ph.D. great our students are — and to learn our staff, faculty not only adapting but thriving. MANAGER OF ALUMNI RELATIONS and alumni are second to none. In my current role, this Becky Higgins becomes more evident each day. DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT Hilary Wheat To me, “resilient” is the word that best describes our school EXECUTIVE EDITORS — a family of students, staff, faculty and alumni on the front Lisa Mallow lines of oral health and critical health science research. 12 Passion and excellent patient Anne Hartung Spenner Throughout the pandemic, everyone here remained care drive our alumni, and that EDITORS committed to the health and well-being of our students, can take them on a variety of Becky Higgins staff, faculty and patients.