The Maritime Dimension of Csdp

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Maritime Dimension of Csdp DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EXTERNAL POLICIES OF THE UNION DIRECTORATE B POLICY DEPARTMENT STUDY THE MARITIME DIMENSION OF CSDP: GEOSTRATEGIC MARITIME CHALLENGES AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION Abstract The global maritime security environment is in the midst of an important transformation, driven by a simultaneous intensification of global maritime flows, the growing interconnectedness of maritime regions, the diffusion of maritime power to emerging powers, and the rise of a number of maritime non-state actors. These changes are having a profound impact on the maritime security environment of the EU and its member states and require an upgrading of the maritime dimension of the EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP). This study analysis the impact that the changing maritime security context is having on the EU’s maritime neighbourhood and along the EU’s sea lines of communications (SLOCs) and takes stock of the EU’s existing policies and instruments in the maritime security domain. Based on this analysis, the study suggests that the EU requires a comprehensive maritime security strategy that creates synergies between the EU’s Integrated Maritime Policy and the maritime dimension of CSDP and that focuses more comprehensively on the security and management of global maritime flows and sea-based activities in the global maritime commons. EP/EXPO/B/SEDE/FWC/2009-01/Lot6/21 January 2013 PE 433.839 EN Policy Department DG External Policies This study was requested by the European Parliament's Subcommittee on Security and Defence. AUTHORS1: Timo BEHR, Research Fellow, FINNISH INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, FINLAND Erik BRATTBERG, Research Fellow, SWEDISH INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, SWEDEN Jyrki KALLIO, Research Fellow, FINNISH INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, FINLAND Mika AALTOLA, Programme Director, FINNISH INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, FINLAND Charly SALONIUS-PASTERNAK, Research Fellow, FINNISH INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, FINLAND Andreas RASPOTNIK, EXACT Marie Curie ITN Research Fellow, TRANS EUROPEAN POLICY STUDIES ASSOCIATION, BELGIUM Maija SALONEN, Coordinator, FINNISH INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, FINLAND ADMINISTRATOR RESPONSIBLE: Ulrich KAROCK Directorate-General for External Policies of the Union Policy Department ASP 03 F 374, rue Wiertz 60, B-1047 Brussels Editorial Assistant: Elina STERGATOU LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE EDITOR Editorial closing date: 29 January 2013. © European Union, 2013 Printed in Belgium. ISBN: 978-92-823-4083-7 DOI: 10.2861/30045 The Information Note is available on the Internet at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/activities/committees/studies.do?language=EN. If you are unable to download the information you require, please request a paper copy by e-mail : [email protected]. DISCLAIMER Any opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation, except for commercial purposes, are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and provided the publisher is given prior notice and supplied with a copy of the publication. 1 This study is the result of collaborative research undertaken between researcher from the Finnish Institute of International Affairs (FIIA) and the Swedish Institute of International Affairs (SIIA). Sections 2, 3, and 4 have been authored by FIIA researchers, while sections 5 and 6 have been authored by SIIA researchers; introduction and conclusion represent joint products. The authors would like to extend their gratitude to Stefan Eklöf Amirell and Mark Rhinard for providing helpful comments on an early draft of the study. 2 The Maritime Dimension of CSDP TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10 1. INTRODUCTION 12 2. THE GLOBAL MARITIME CONTEXT 13 2.1 CONTESTED MARITIME COMMONS 13 2.2 EVOLVING MARITIME BALANCE OF POWER 16 2.3 EMERGING MARITIME SECURITY THREATS 19 2.4 FUTURE MARITIME GOVERNANCE SCENARIOS 21 3. THE EU’S MARITIME NEIGHBOURHOOD 25 3.1 THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA 25 3.1.1 Significance 25 3.1.2 Security Challenges 26 3.1.3 Future Challenges & Implications 29 3.2 THE BLACK SEA 31 3.2.1 Significance 31 3.2.2 Security Challenges 31 3.2.3 Future Challenges & Implications 33 3.3 THE BALTIC SEA 33 3.3.1 Significance 33 3.3.2 Security Challenges 34 3.3.3 Future Challenges & Implications 35 3.4 WEST AFRICA 35 3.4.1 Significance 35 3.4.2 Security Challenges 36 3.4.3 Future Challenges & Implications 37 3.5 CONCLUSIONS 38 4. SEA LINES OF COMMUNICATIONS (SLOCS) 40 4.1 THE SOUTHERN CORRIDOR 40 4.1.1 Significance 40 3 Policy Department DG External Policies 4.1.2 Security Challenges 41 4.1.3 Future Challenges & Implications 45 4.2 THE EASTERN CORRIDOR 46 4.2.1 Significance 46 4.2.2 Security Challenges 47 4.2.3 Future challenges & Implications 51 4.3 THE NORTHERN CORRIDOR 52 4.3.1 Significance 53 4.3.2 Security Challenges 56 4.3.3 Future Challenges & Implications 58 4.4 CONCLUSIONS 58 5. THE EU AS A MARITIME SECURITY ACTOR 62 5.1 POLICY FRAMEWORK 62 5.1.1 CSDP after Lisbon 62 5.1.2 European Security Strategy (2003) 63 5.1.3 Implementation Report on the European Security Strategy (2008) 63 5.2 SECONDARY LEGISLATION 64 5.2.1 Commission Communication on an Integrated Maritime Policy (2007) 64 5.2.2 Resolution of the European Parliament on piracy at sea (2008) 64 5.2.3 EU Council conclusions on Maritime security strategy (2010) 64 5.2.4 Strategic Framework for Horn of Africa (2011) 64 5.3 OVERVIEW OF ACTORS INVOLVED IN SHAPING EU'S APPROACH TO MARITIME SECURITY 65 5.3.1 European External Action Service (EEAS) 65 5.3.2 European Union Military Committee (EUMC) 66 5.3.3 EU Military Staff (EUMS) 66 5.3.4 Crisis Management and Planning Directorate (CMPD) 66 5.3.5 EU Operations Centre for the Horn of Africa 66 5.3.6 The Committee for Civilian Aspects of Crisis Management (CIVCOM) 67 5.3.7 Civilian Planning and Conduct Capability (CPCC) 67 5.3.8 Political and Security Committee (PSC) 67 5.3.9 EU Delegations 68 5.3.10 European Commission 68 5.3.11 European Parliament 68 5.4 EU INSTRUMENTS 68 5.4.1 Financial Instruments 69 4 The Maritime Dimension of CSDP 5.4.2 Instrument for Stability (IfS) 70 5.4.3 European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument (ENPI) 71 5.4.4 European Development Fund (EDF) 71 5.4.5 Partnership Instrument for cooperation with third countries (PI) 72 5.4.6 Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI) 72 5.4.7 European Commission’s Joint Research Centre 73 5.4.8 CSDP/CSFP budget 73 5.5 OTHER RELEVANT EU AGENCIES 74 5.5.1 European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) 74 5.5.2 Frontex 74 5.6 EU MILITARY CAPABILITIES 75 5.7 OTHER EUROPEAN BILATERAL INITIATIVES AND JOINT FORCES 76 5.7.1 Franco-British security and defence cooperation 76 5.7.2 Nordic Defence Cooperation (NORDEFCO) 76 5.7.3 European Amphibious Initiative (EAI) 77 5.7.4 European Carrier Group Interoperability Initiative (ECGII) 77 5.7.5 European Maritime Forces (EUROMARFOR) 77 5.8 ALLIANCES & PARTNERSHIPS 77 5.8.1 NATO 77 5.8.2 African Union (AU) 78 5.8.3 ASEAN 79 5.8.4 United Nations 79 5.8.5 Contact Group on Piracy off the Coast of Somalia (CGPCS) 80 5.8.6 United States 81 5.8.7 Bilateral agreements 81 5.8.8 Political dialogues 82 6. EU MARITIME SECURITY OPERATIONS 83 6.1 EU NAVFOR OPERATION ATALANTA 83 6.1.1 Legal mandate 83 6.1.2 Operational implementation 84 6.1.3 Lessons learned 85 6.2 EUCAP NESTOR 85 6.2.1 Legal mandate 85 6.2.2 Operational implementation 86 6.2.3 Lessons learned 87 6.3 FILLING THE GAPS 87 5 Policy Department DG External Policies 6.3.1 Inter-institutional coordination 87 6.3.2 Intra-institutional coordination 89 7. CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS 91 8. BIBLIOGRAPHY 96 9. ANNEX 104 9.1 WORKSHOP SUMMARY REPORT - 'THE MARITIME DIMENSION OF THE COMMON SECURITY AND DEFENCE POLICY'- 27 NOVEMBER 2012, BRUSSELS 104 6 The Maritime Dimension of CSDP LIST OF ACRONYMS A2/AD Anti-access and area-denial capabilities AAR air-to-air refuelling ABM Anti-Ballistic Missile ABR Arctic Bridge Route AC Arctic Council AGS air-to-ground refuelling AMSA Arctic Shipping Assessment Report AMISOM African Union Mission to Somalia ASEAN Association of Southeast Asian Nations AU African Union bbl Barrels bbl/d Barrels per day BMD Ballistic Missile Defence C3 control, command, communications CFSP Common Foreign and Security Policy CGPCS Contact Group on Piracy off the Coast of Somalia CISE Common Information Sharing Environment CIVCOM Committee for Civilian Aspects of Crisis Management CMF Combined Maritime Forces CMPD Crisis Management and Planning Directorate CONOPS Conduct of Operations CPCC Civilian Planning and Conduct Capability CSDP Common Security and Defence Policy DCI Development Cooperation Instrument DG ECHO European Commission Directorate General of Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection DG MARE European Commission Directorate General of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries DRTC Djibouti Regional Training Centre EAI European Amphibious Initiative ECGII European Carrier Group Interoperability Initiative EDA European Defence Agency EDF European Development Fund EEAS European External Action Service EEZ Exclusive Economic Zone EMSA European Maritime Safety Agency 7 Policy Department DG External Policies ENPI European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument ESS European Security Strategy EUMC European Union Military Committee EUMS EU Military Staff EUROMARFOR European Maritime Force EUROSUR European External Border Surveillance System EUSR EU Special Representative GCTF Global Counter-Terrorism Forum GDP Gross
Recommended publications
  • Matthew Henson (August 8, 1866 – March 9, 1955) “First African-American Artic Explorer”
    The Clerk’s Black History Series Debra DeBerry Clerk of Superior Court DeKalb County Matthew Henson (August 8, 1866 – March 9, 1955) “First African-American Artic Explorer” Matthew Henson was born August 8, 1866, in Nanjemoy, Maryland, to freeborn black sharecropper parents. In 1867, his parents and three sisters moved to Georgetown to escape racial violence where his mother died when Matthew was seven years old. When Matthew’s father died, he went to live with his uncle in Washington, D.C. When Matthew was ten years old, he attended a ceremony honoring Abraham Lincoln where he heard social reformer and abolitionist, Frederick Douglas speak. Shortly thereafter, he left home, determined to find his own way. After working briefly in a restaurant, he walked all the way to Baltimore, Maryland. At the age of 12, Matthew went to sea as a cabin boy on the merchant ship Katie Hines, traveling to Asia, Africa and Europe under the watchful eye of the ship’s skipper, Captain Childs. After Captain Childs died, Matthew moved back to Washington, D.C. When Matthew was 21 years old, he met Commander Robert E. Peary, an explorer and officer in the U.S. Navy Corps of Civil Engineers. Impressed with Matthew’s seafaring experience, Commander Peary recruited him for an upcoming voyage to Nicaragua. After returning from Nicaragua, Matthew found work in Philadelphia, and in April 1891 he met and married Eva Flint. But shortly thereafter, the two explorers were off again for an expedition to Green- land and the marriage to Eva ended. Matthew and the Commander would cover thousands of miles across the sea and the world, exploring and making multiple attempts to reach the North Pole.
    [Show full text]
  • Les Notes De L'ifri N° 4 the United States and the European Security
    les notes de l’ifri n° 4 série transatlantique The United States and the European Security and Defense Identity in the New NATO Les États-Unis et l’Identité européenne de sécurité et de défense dans la nouvelle OTAN Philip Gordon Senior Fellow for US Strategic Studies and Editor of Survival, International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS, London) 1998 Institut français des relations internationales Le programme transatlantique est organisé avec le concours du German Marshall Fund of the United States. Cette publication a également reçu le soutien de la Délégation aux affaires stratégiques du ministère de la Défense L’Ifri est un centre de recherche et un lieu de débats sur les grands enjeux politiques et économiques internationaux. Dirigé par Thierry de Montbrial depuis sa fondation en 1979, l’Ifri a succédé au Centre d’études de politique étrangère créé en 1935. Il bénéficie du statut d’association reconnue d’utilité publique (loi de 1901). L’Ifri dispose d’une équipe de spécialistes qui mène des programmes de recherche sur des sujets politiques, stratégiques, économiques et régionaux, et assure un suivi des grandes questions internationales. © Droits exclusivement réservés, Ifri, Paris, 1998 ISBN 2-86592-061-5 ISSN 1272-9914 Ifri - 27, rue de la Procession - 75740 Paris Cedex 15 - France Tél.: 33 (0)1 40 61 60 00 – Fax : 33 (0)1 40 61 60 60 Contents Les États-Unis et l’IESD dans la nouvelle OTAN (résumé en français) . 5 The United States and ESDI in the New NATO (summary in French) Introduction . 11 Introduction American Unilateralism After the Cold War .
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Force Quarterly Hans Binnendijk Patrick M
    0115Cover1 8/4/97 11:01 AM Page 1 JFJOINTQ FORCE QUARTERLY RMA Essay Contest Interservice Competition NATO, EUROPEAN SECURITY,AND BEYOND Military Support to Spring The Nation 97 The Son Tay Raid A PROFESSIONAL MILITARY JOURNAL 0215Cover2 8/5/97 7:49 AM Page C2 Victory smiles upon those who anticipate the changes in the character of war, not upon those who wait to adapt themselves after the changes occur. —Guilio Douhet Cov 2 JFQ / Spring 1997 0315Prelims 8/4/97 1:28 PM Page 1 JFQ AWord from the I NATO’s consultative mechanisms have been a positive force for stability on the Continent and were central to the solution of bilateral problems among its Chairman members I NATO forces, policies, and procedures proved to be an essential and irreplaceable foundation for the coalition’s success in Operation Desert Storm ight years ago, as the Berlin Wall crum- I NATO forces from 15 allied nations—backed by bled and the Cold War began to fade, 22 other countries, including Russia—are keeping order in Bosnia-Herzegovina today, a peace brought about by two themes dominated media reports the force of NATO arms. about Europe. First, many pundits ar- Egued that while our hearts might remain in Eu- In the future, Europe will remain a center of rope our central strategic and economic interests wealth, democracy, and power. For the United would lie elsewhere in the future. For some, our States, it will remain a region of vital interest. Ac- focus would be primarily on the Middle East, for cording to our national security strategy, “Our ob- others on Latin America, and for still others on jective in Europe is to complete the construction the Asia-Pacific region.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Supplement to the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society Vol
    J. Blunden, D. S. Arndt, and M. O. Baringer, Eds. Associate Eds. K. M. Willett, A. J. Dolman, B. D. Hall, P. W. Thorne, J. M. Levy, H. J. Diamond, J. Richter-Menge, M. Jeffries, R. L. Fogt, L. A. Vincent, and J. M. Renwick Special Supplement to the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society Vol. 92, No. 6, June 2011 www.whoi.edu/beaufort) show that the pack ice in the e. Land central Canada Basin is changing from a multiyear to 1) veGetation—D. A. Walker, U. S. Bhatt, T. V. Callaghan, J. a seasonal ice cover. C. Comiso, H. E. Epstein, B. C. Forbes, M. Gill, W. A. Gould, G. H. R. Henry, G. J. Jia, S. V. Kokelj, T. C. Lantz, S. F Oberbauer, 3) Sea ice thickness J. E. Pinzon, M. K. Raynolds, G. R. Shaver, C. J. Tucker, C. E. Combined estimates of ice thickness from sub- Tweedie, and P. J. Webber marine and satellite-based instruments provide the Circumpolar changes to tundra vegetation are longest record of sea ice thickness observation, begin- monitored from space using the Normalized Differ- ning in 1980 (Kwok et al. 2009; Ro throck et al. 2008). ence Vegetation Index (NDVI), an index of vegetation These data indicate that over a region covering ~38% greenness. In tundra regions, the annual maximum of the Arctic Ocean there is a long-term trend of sea NDVI (MaxNDVI) is usually achieved in early Au- ice thinning over the last three decades. gust and is correlated with above-ground biomass, Haas et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of European Naval Power and the High-End Challenge Jeremy Stöhs
    Jeremy Stöhs ABOUT THE AUTHOR Dr. Jeremy Stöhs is the Deputy Director of the Austrian Center for Intelligence, Propaganda and Security Studies (ACIPSS) and a Non-Resident Fellow at the Institute for Security Policy, HOW HIGH? Kiel University. His research focuses on U.S. and European defence policy, maritime strategy and security, as well as public THE FUTURE OF security and safety. EUROPEAN NAVAL POWER AND THE HIGH-END CHALLENGE ISBN 978875745035-4 DJØF PUBLISHING IN COOPERATION WITH 9 788757 450354 CENTRE FOR MILITARY STUDIES How High? The Future of European Naval Power and the High-End Challenge Jeremy Stöhs How High? The Future of European Naval Power and the High-End Challenge Djøf Publishing In cooperation with Centre for Military Studies 2021 Jeremy Stöhs How High? The Future of European Naval Power and the High-End Challenge © 2021 by Djøf Publishing All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means – electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise – without the prior written permission of the Publisher. This publication is peer reviewed according to the standards set by the Danish Ministry of Higher Education and Science. Cover: Morten Lehmkuhl Print: Ecograf Printed in Denmark 2021 ISBN 978-87-574-5035-4 Djøf Publishing Gothersgade 137 1123 København K Telefon: 39 13 55 00 e-mail: [email protected] www. djoef-forlag.dk Editors’ preface The publications of this series present new research on defence and se- curity policy of relevance to Danish and international decision-makers.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Policy &
    Arctic Policy & Law References to Selected Documents Edited by Wolfgang E. Burhenne Prepared by Jennifer Kelleher and Aaron Laur Published by the International Council of Environmental Law – toward sustainable development – (ICEL) for the Arctic Task Force of the IUCN Commission on Environmental Law (IUCN-CEL) Arctic Policy & Law References to Selected Documents Edited by Wolfgang E. Burhenne Prepared by Jennifer Kelleher and Aaron Laur Published by The International Council of Environmental Law – toward sustainable development – (ICEL) for the Arctic Task Force of the IUCN Commission on Environmental Law The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of ICEL or the Arctic Task Force of the IUCN Commission on Environmental Law concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers and boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of ICEL or the Arctic Task Force. The preparation of Arctic Policy & Law: References to Selected Documents was a project of ICEL with the support of the Elizabeth Haub Foundations (Germany, USA, Canada). Published by: International Council of Environmental Law (ICEL), Bonn, Germany Copyright: © 2011 International Council of Environmental Law (ICEL) Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non- commercial purposes is authorized without prior permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. Citation: International Council of Environmental Law (ICEL) (2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Names
    Commentary THE FLOOR OF THE ARCTICOCEAN: GEOGRAPHIC NAMES M. A. Beall, F. Edvalson2, K. Hunkins3, A. Molloyl, and N. Ostenso4 HE NAMING OF OCEAN FLOOR features in the Arctic seems to have been done Twithout thought to standardization in geographic nomenclature. W. K. Lyon, Director of the Arctic Sciences and Technology Division of the US.Navy Electronics Laboratory, called a meeting of the authors of the present paper to arbitrate the naming of these features in the hope that it would help to stem the proliferation of new namesand to standardize the names of the major features. The decisions of the meeting which was held in San Diego on 10 and 11 January 1966 were based on the following criteria: 1. Consistency with the Undersea terms and definitions proposed by the Advisory Committee on Undersea Features to the U.S. Board on Geo- graphicNames (Washington, D.C.: 1964) andLimits of Oceans and Seas, InternationalHydrographic Bureau Special PublicationNo. 23 (Monte Carlo: 1953) 2. Common usage 3. Priority of discovery or naming 4. Association withestablished geographic features 5. Minimizing ambiguity Fifty-four major features were discussed. Table 1 lists the names considered, the final suggested name, the approximate location, and the status of the name with the U.S. Board on Geographic Names and the International Hydrographic Bureau. The final suggested names represent the majority decision of the authors but it should be noted that in certain cases there was not complete unanimity. For the most part, however, it it felt that the accepted names should raise little controversy. The authors will endeavour to use the final suggested namesin future publications, and it is hoped that other investigatorswill find them suitable for their use.
    [Show full text]
  • Redacted for Privacy Abstract Approved: John V
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF MIAH ALLAN BEAL for the Doctor of Philosophy (Name) (Degree) in Oceanography presented on August 12.1968 (Major) (Date) Title:Batymety and_Strictuof_thp..4rctic_Ocean Redacted for Privacy Abstract approved: John V. The history of the explordtion of the Central Arctic Ocean is reviewed.It has been only within the last 15 years that any signifi- cant number of depth-sounding data have been collected.The present study uses seven million echo soundings collected by U. S. Navy nuclear submarines along nearly 40, 000 km of track to construct, for the first time, a reasonably complete picture of the physiography of the basin of the Arctic Ocean.The use of nuclear submarines as under-ice survey ships is discussed. The physiography of the entire Arctic basin and of each of the major features in the basin are described, illustrated and named. The dominant ocean floor features are three mountain ranges, generally paralleling each other and the 40°E. 140°W. meridian. From the Pacific- side of the Arctic basin toward the Atlantic, they are: The Alpha Cordillera; The Lomonosov Ridge; andThe Nansen Cordillera. The Alpha Cordillera is the widest of the three mountain ranges. It abuts the continental slopes off the Canadian Archipelago and off Asia across more than550of longitude on each slope.Its minimum width of about 300 km is located midway between North America and Asia.In cross section, the Alpha Cordillera is a broad arch rising about two km, above the floor of the basin.The arch is marked by volcanoes and regions of "high fractured plateau, and by scarps500to 1000 meters high.The small number of data from seismology, heat flow, magnetics and gravity studies are reviewed.The Alpha Cordillera is interpreted to be an inactive mid-ocean ridge which has undergone some subsidence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Opening of the Transpolar Sea Route: Logistical, Geopolitical, Environmental, and Socioeconomic Impacts
    Marine Policy xxx (xxxx) xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Marine Policy journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol The opening of the Transpolar Sea Route: Logistical, geopolitical, environmental, and socioeconomic impacts Mia M. Bennett a,*, Scott R. Stephenson b, Kang Yang c,d,e, Michael T. Bravo f, Bert De Jonghe g a Department of Geography and School of Modern Languages & Cultures (China Studies Programme), Room 8.09, Jockey Club Tower, Centennial Campus, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong b RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA c School of Geography and Ocean Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023, China d Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210023, China e Collaborative Innovation Center for the South Sea Studies, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023, China f Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK g Graduate School of Design, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA ABSTRACT With current scientifc models forecasting an ice-free Central Arctic Ocean (CAO) in summer by mid-century and potentially earlier, a direct shipping route via the North Pole connecting markets in Asia, North America, and Europe may soon open. The Transpolar Sea Route (TSR) would represent a third Arctic shipping route in addition to the Northern Sea Route and Northwest Passage. In response to the continued decline of sea ice thickness and extent and growing recognition within the Arctic and global governance communities of the need to anticipate
    [Show full text]
  • SESSION I : Geographical Names and Sea Names
    The 14th International Seminar on Sea Names Geography, Sea Names, and Undersea Feature Names Types of the International Standardization of Sea Names: Some Clues for the Name East Sea* Sungjae Choo (Associate Professor, Department of Geography, Kyung-Hee University Seoul 130-701, KOREA E-mail: [email protected]) Abstract : This study aims to categorize and analyze internationally standardized sea names based on their origins. Especially noting the cases of sea names using country names and dual naming of seas, it draws some implications for complementing logics for the name East Sea. Of the 110 names for 98 bodies of water listed in the book titled Limits of Oceans and Seas, the most prevalent cases are named after adjacent geographical features; followed by commemorative names after persons, directions, and characteristics of seas. These international practices of naming seas are contrary to Japan's argument for the principle of using the name of archipelago or peninsula. There are several cases of using a single name of country in naming a sea bordering more than two countries, with no serious disputes. This implies that a specific focus should be given to peculiar situation that the name East Sea contains, rather than the negative side of using single country name. In order to strengthen the logic for justifying dual naming, it is suggested, an appropriate reference should be made to the three newly adopted cases of dual names, in the respects of the history of the surrounding region and the names, people's perception, power structure of the relevant countries, and the process of the standardization of dual names.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada's Arctic Marine Atlas
    Lincoln Sea Hall Basin MARINE ATLAS ARCTIC CANADA’S GREENLAND Ellesmere Island Kane Basin Nares Strait N nd ansen Sou s d Axel n Sve Heiberg rdr a up Island l Ch ann North CANADA’S s el I Pea Water ry Ch a h nnel Massey t Sou Baffin e Amund nd ISR Boundary b Ringnes Bay Ellef Norwegian Coburg Island Grise Fiord a Ringnes Bay Island ARCTIC MARINE z Island EEZ Boundary Prince i Borden ARCTIC l Island Gustaf E Adolf Sea Maclea Jones n Str OCEAN n ait Sound ATLANTIC e Mackenzie Pe Ball nn antyn King Island y S e trait e S u trait it Devon Wel ATLAS Stra OCEAN Q Prince l Island Clyde River Queens in Bylot Patrick Hazen Byam gt Channel o Island Martin n Island Ch tr. Channel an Pond Inlet S Bathurst nel Qikiqtarjuaq liam A Island Eclipse ust Lancaster Sound in Cornwallis Sound Hecla Ch Fitzwil Island and an Griper nel ait Bay r Resolute t Melville Barrow Strait Arctic Bay S et P l Island r i Kel l n e c n e n Somerset Pangnirtung EEZ Boundary a R M'Clure Strait h Island e C g Baffin Island Brodeur y e r r n Peninsula t a P I Cumberland n Peel Sound l e Sound Viscount Stefansson t Melville Island Sound Prince Labrador of Wales Igloolik Prince Sea it Island Charles ra Hadley Bay Banks St s Island le a Island W Hall Beach f Beaufort o M'Clintock Gulf of Iqaluit e c n Frobisher Bay i Channel Resolution r Boothia Boothia Sea P Island Sachs Franklin Peninsula Committee Foxe Harbour Strait Bay Melville Peninsula Basin Kimmirut Taloyoak N UNAT Minto Inlet Victoria SIA VUT Makkovik Ulukhaktok Kugaaruk Foxe Island Hopedale Liverpool Amundsen Victoria King
    [Show full text]
  • The Opening of the Northern Sea Routes
    Volume 9 • Issue 19 • May 2016 THE OPENING OF THE NORTHERN SEA ROUTES: THE IMPLICATIONS FOR GLOBAL SHIPPING AND FOR CANADA’S RELATIONS WITH ASIA* Hugh Stephens SUMMARY All the excitement around the great possibilities that the opening of the Northwest Passage could offer the shipping industry — and Canada — could not last. Just a few years ago, as sea ice in the North seemed to be steadily melting away, observers were eagerly tallying up the savings in time, fuel and costs that a reliably ice-free route across the top of the planet would provide for shippers. A couple of trial runs only confirmed that for shipments from Asia to Europe or North America, or the other way around, the route could shave thousands of kilometres off each trip, compared to journeys through the Suez or Panama canals. Rapid growth in shipping traffic across the Northwest Passage and its sister route, the Northern Sea Route, seemed not just inevitable, but imminent. Just a short while later, it now seems neither imminent nor inevitable. The retreat in sea ice may persist, but it is evident that due to regular fluctuations in ice coverage, the Northwest Passage will not be reliably ice-free for many, many years, if ever. Shipping may be more possible through the Northwest Passage than it was in the past, but it will not be consistently unobstructed. The challenges of ice combined with Arctic weather conditions may well mean that any shipping through the passage is slower than expected. Other complicating factors include uncharted or poorly charted sea lanes and the difficulty in securing insurance for Arctic shipping.
    [Show full text]