DOCSLIB.ORG

Hertfordshire Infrastructure and Investment Strategy Update

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

FOREWORD In early 2012 I was commissioned by Hertfordshire County Council on behalf of the Hertfordshire Infrastructure & Investment Partnership (HIPP) and the Hertfordshire Local Enterprise Partnership (Herts LEP) to undertake a refresh of the 2009 Hertfordshire Infrastructure and Investment Strategy (HIIS - a study in which I had acted as project manager for the 11 Hertfordshire authorities who had collectively commissioned it. The need for the refresh of the 2009 study was felt to be self evident. Since the date of publication, whilst the need for new infrastructure for the county had not diminished, much of the context in which it was being promoted had changed. HIPP and the Herts LEP wanted to understand these changes and the impact they were having, particularly insofar as they were likely to affect the likelihood of delivery. Equally however they also wanted to consider ways in which the drive to deliver new infrastructure could be ramped up. The document is partly a statement of where we are now and what that means for infrastructure planning in Hertfordshire, but partly also an attempt to point the way forward for the key Hertfordshire agencies - what they need to do deliver more infrastructure projects in the county. This calls for both new ways of thinking and new alliances of agencies working constructively together. Much is made in this report of the changes to the infrastructure planning landscape since 2009 and now. What is perhaps quite striking is the change of emphasis that has come about in the last few months, after the report's contents had been finalised following the October 2012 Hertfordshire Infrastructure Planning Conference. I cover this in Chapter 11, which provides in many ways a very positive postscript to the rest of the report. There is no doubt that infrastructure planning and delivery is now more 'centre stage' than it has been for many years - not only seen as key to Hertfordshire's general health and wellbeing, but also crucial in terms of the role it is expected to play in leading the country out of the economic doldrums. For that reason, this report is very timely. The next stage will be to turn the findings into reality Rob Shipway R S Regeneration January 2013 [email protected] (i) TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword… ……….…...…………………………………………………………………………….(i) Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. 1 Chapter 1: Introduction .......................................................................................................... 4 Chapter 2: About HIIS - what it achieved and why review it now? ......................................... 7 Chapter 3: The changing world of infrastructure planning ................................................... 10 Chapter 4: the scope of the update of HIIS ......................................................................... 16 Chapter 5: Updating Hertfordshire’s Infrastructure Needs ................................................... 17 Chapter 6: Relationship between the spatial aspects of growth and infrastructure need ..... 49 Chapter 7: The Funding of Hertfordshire's Infrastructure .................................................... 64 Chapter 8: The relationship between strategic and local infrastructure need ....................... 74 Chapter 9: The Management of Infrastructure Planning and Delivery ................................. 86 Chapter 10: Findings and conclusions .............................................................................. 100 Chapter 11: Postcript - new infrastructure related initiatives in autumn 2012 ..................... 109 Appendix A – Assumptions on growth levels to 2031 ........................................................ 110 Appendix B – Review of growth within masterplanned Areas ............................................ 116 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. This review of the 2009 Hertfordshire Infrastructure & Investment Strategy (HIIS) has been jointly commissioned by the Hertfordshire Infrastructure Planning Partnership (HIPP) and the Hertfordshire Local Enterprise Partnership (Herts LEP) as a result of the many changes to the world of infrastructure planning and delivery that have come about since the original report's publication. 2. Much of what the 2009 HIIS study was able to cover remains valid, so this review covers only specific areas that need to be addressed because of changed circumstances. Only a partial review of infrastructure needs has been conducted, therefore, and this review does not revisit historic infrastructure needs, developer receipts or viability issues. 3. It does however focus on the relationship between future growth and infrastructure needs, the managing of infrastructure and delivery, and the relationship between strategic and local infrastructure need. These are all areas that the 2009 HIIS report was unable to explore in full, or where other changes in the political and planning landscape means that a new set of circumstances needs to be considered. 4. Those changes include the ongoing impact of the recession: the adoption of a National Planning Policy Framework; the removal of the regional planning tier and the new emphasis on localism; new funding mechanisms, some of which are more likely to 'reward' Hertfordshire; and finally the emergence of the Hertfordshire LEP and its potential role in infrastructure planning. 5. Additionally, the recent experiences of the assessment of bids to the government's Growing Places Fund shows that Hertfordshire is not yet in the place it needs to be in having a depth of infrastructure projects ready and able to take advantage of new funding opportunities. 6. The review updates the county's infrastructure needs by revisiting the key services that provide the county's infrastructure, and asks the question of what has changed. The position is patchy: much for instance has happened to move events forward in terms of transportation needs, including strategic planning and partnership work which will lead to the delivery of the Croxley Rail Link in Watford. 7. A range of other services - education, adult care, children's services for instance, have a solid basis for planning and delivering new facilities to respond to the growth agenda (although they are also having to cope with in some cases, demographic changes, including a rising birth rate and an aging population). 8. Other infrastructure provision, it is fair to say, has some way to go: green infrastructure provision needs to move beyond strategy to implementable projects, health infrastructure providers are having to cope with service delivery and procurement changes simultaneously, whilst a number of utility providers have the tendency to be reactive to changing needs, rather than taking a more proactive role. And since 2009, 'new' infrastructure - superfast broadband and the delivery of renewable energy projects - has grown in importance. REFRESH OF HIIS JANUARY 2013 1 9. The review then turns its attention to the relationship between the spatial aspects of growth and infrastructure need, and finds big changes since 2009. With the sweeping away of both the regional tier of government and the imposition of minimum growth requirements on local authorities, numbers are changing; the review now anticipates that 22,000 fewer dwellings (102,000 down from 124,000) will be built in the county in the 30 years to 2031. Large scale greenfield releases which were being contemplated during the current decade are now not likely to take place until after 2021. 10. Consequently the nature of infrastructure planning will have a much greater emphasis on incremental growth rather than major urban extensions, although some shorter term smaller scale (c500 dwelling) proposals are anticipated over the next few years as well as the promotion of a range of strategic sites. 11. A number of uncertainties remain about precise numbers and locations of new development and until these are resolved, infrastructure planning will continue to pose difficulties for service providers. One thing is certain however, is even that even the reduced levels of development now expected will need new infrastructure to serve it, and that the backlog of infrastructure need (what the 2009 HIIS report referred to as the Infrastructure Deficit, at some £2.4bn) still remains. 12. The review then turns to the funding of infrastructure, including the impact of the introduction of the Community Infrastructure Levy. When introduced in the county over the next few years, the charge will make a substantial difference to the funding of new infrastructure, but it will in no way be the complete answer - the review estimates that it is likely to fund less than 20% of the county's future infrastructure needs - a case study of Baldock's infrastructure needs backs this up, and illustrates the difficult choices that will be faced in prioritising CIL investment. 13. The answer is that CIL may have to be increasingly seen as providing 'top up' funding rather than 'whole project' funding - for instance plugging an infrastructure funding gap as part of an overall funding packages. The review examines how infrastructure funding packages work, firstly by taking a look at the structure of the £1.5bn Greater Manchester Transport Fund, and then moving closer to home by illustrating how the funding for the Croxley Rail Link came together. 14. A range of new and emerging funding initiatives are illustrated, with the commentary that the Hertfordshire agencies need to explore
Recommended publications
  • Rail Accident Report

    Rail Accident Report

    Rail Accident Report Penetration and obstruction of a tunnel between Old Street and Essex Road stations, London 8 March 2013 Report 03/2014 February 2014 This investigation was carried out in accordance with: l the Railway Safety Directive 2004/49/EC; l the Railways and Transport Safety Act 2003; and l the Railways (Accident Investigation and Reporting) Regulations 2005. © Crown copyright 2014 You may re-use this document/publication (not including departmental or agency logos) free of charge in any format or medium. You must re-use it accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and you must give the title of the source publication. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This document/publication is also available at www.raib.gov.uk. Any enquiries about this publication should be sent to: RAIB Email: [email protected] The Wharf Telephone: 01332 253300 Stores Road Fax: 01332 253301 Derby UK Website: www.raib.gov.uk DE21 4BA This report is published by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch, Department for Transport. Penetration and obstruction of a tunnel between Old Street and Essex Road stations, London 8 March 2013 Contents Summary 5 Introduction 6 Preface 6 Key definitions 6 The incident 7 Summary of the incident 7 Context 7 Events preceding the incident 9 Events following the incident 11 Consequences of the incident 11 The investigation 12 Sources of evidence 12 Key facts and analysis
  • High Speed Rail

    High Speed Rail

    House of Commons Transport Committee High Speed Rail Tenth Report of Session 2010–12 Volume III Additional written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be published 24 May, 7, 14, 21 and 28 June, 12 July, 6, 7 and 13 September and 11 October 2011 Published on 8 November 2011 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited The Transport Committee The Transport Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Transport and its Associate Public Bodies. Current membership Mrs Louise Ellman (Labour/Co-operative, Liverpool Riverside) (Chair) Steve Baker (Conservative, Wycombe) Jim Dobbin (Labour/Co-operative, Heywood and Middleton) Mr Tom Harris (Labour, Glasgow South) Julie Hilling (Labour, Bolton West) Kwasi Kwarteng (Conservative, Spelthorne) Mr John Leech (Liberal Democrat, Manchester Withington) Paul Maynard (Conservative, Blackpool North and Cleveleys) Iain Stewart (Conservative, Milton Keynes South) Graham Stringer (Labour, Blackley and Broughton) Julian Sturdy (Conservative, York Outer) The following were also members of the committee during the Parliament. Angie Bray (Conservative, Ealing Central and Acton) Lilian Greenwood (Labour, Nottingham South) Kelvin Hopkins (Labour, Luton North) Gavin Shuker (Labour/Co-operative, Luton South) Angela Smith (Labour, Penistone and Stocksbridge) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
  • The Uk's Privatisation Experiment

    The Uk's Privatisation Experiment

    THE UK’S PRIVATISATION EXPERIMENT: THE P ASSAGE OF TIME PERMITS A SOBER ASSESSMENT DAVID PARKER CESIFO WORKING PAPER NO. 1126 CATEGORY 9: INDUSTRIAL ORGANISATION FEBRUARY 2004 PRESENTED AT CESIFO CONFERENCE ON PRIVATISATION EXPERIENCES IN THE EU NOVEMBER 2003 An electronic version of the paper may be downloaded • from the SSRN website: www.SSRN.com • from the CESifo website: www.CESifo.de CESifo Working Paper No. 1126 THE UK’S PRIVATISATION EXPERIMENT: THE PASSAGE OF TIME PERMITS A SOBER ASSESSMENT Abstract This chapter looks at the UK’s privatisation experiment, which began from the late 1970s. It considers the background to the UK’s privatisations, which industries were privatised and how, and summarises the results of studies of performance changes in privatised companies in the UK. It looks at the relative roles of competition, regulation and ownership changes in determining performance improvement. It concludes by looking at the wider lessons that might be learned from the UK’s privatisation experiment, including the importance of developing competitive markets and, in their absence, effective regulatory regimes. Keywords: UK, privatisation, competition regulation, lessons. JEL Classification: L33, H82, L51. David Parker Cranfield University School of Management Cranfield Bedfordshire MK43 0AL United Kingdom [email protected] Introduction The Labour Government of 1974-79 arranged the sale of some of the state’s shareholding in the petroleum company BP. However, this sale was dictated by budgetary pressures and did not reflect a belief within government that state industries should be privatised. Indeed, the same Labour Government took into state ownership two major industries, namely aerospace and shipbuilding.
  • Members and Parish/Neighbourhood Councils RAIL UPDATE

    Members and Parish/Neighbourhood Councils RAIL UPDATE

    ITEM 1 TRANSPORT COMMITTEE NEWS 07 MARCH 2000 This report may be of interest to: All Members and Parish/Neighbourhood Councils RAIL UPDATE Accountable Officer: John Inman Author: Stephen Mortimer 1. Purpose 1.1 To advise the Committee of developments relating to Milton Keynes’ rail services. 2. Summary 2.1 West Coast Main Line Modernisation and Upgrade is now in the active planning stage. It will result in faster and more frequent train services between Milton Keynes Central and London, and between Milton Keynes Central and points north. Bletchley and Wolverton will also have improved services to London. 2.2 Funding for East-West Rail is now being sought from the Shadow Strategic Rail Authority (SSRA) for the western end of the line (Oxford-Bedford). Though the SSRA have permitted a bid only for a 60 m.p.h. single-track railway, excluding the Aylesbury branch and upgrade of the Marston Vale (Bedford-Bletchley) line, other Railtrack investment and possible developer contributions (yet to be investigated) may allow these elements to be included, as well as perhaps a 90 m.p.h. double- track railway. As this part of East-West Rail already exists, no form of planning permission is required; however, Transport and Works Act procedures are to be started to build the missing parts of the eastern end of the line. 2.3 New trains were introduced on the Marston Vale line, Autumn 1999. A study of the passenger accessibility of Marston Vale stations identified various desirable improvements, for which a contribution of £10,000 is required from this Council.
  • ED142 : NHDC Final Response to Inspector's Actions Arising out of The

    ED142 : NHDC Final Response to Inspector's Actions Arising out of The

    ED142 : NHDC Final response to Inspector’s Actions arising out of the Hearing Sessions Matter 6 – Deliverability Action Date on which Examination Doc Action Completed Reference No. • NHDC to provide updated version of Table A of Matter Enclosed as ED142 Appendix M6-1 6 Hearing Statement (to include infrastructure for other allocated sites (i.e. not housing sites)) and the Housing Trajectory • NHDC to provide updated Infrastructure Delivery Plan 23/01/ 2018 ED73 • Infrastructure Delivery Plan Appendix A 23/02/2018 ED73a Enclosed As Appendix M6-2 • Hertfordshire County Council to provide suggested 21/02/2018 ED105 Enclosed as additional/amended wording in the Plan regarding Appendix M6-3 transport issues for consideration by NHDC MM028, MM031, MM032 and MM033. • NHDC to liaise with Stevenage Borough Council with Enclosed as ED142 Appendix M6-4 regard to additional/amended wording • NHDC to provide note clarifying transport position 08/02/2018 ED86 Enclosed as with regard to B656 between Codicote and Appendix M6-5 Knebworth as raised by Mr Bamber of Save Rural Codicote • NHDC to provide note clarifying whether or not 08/02/2018 ED85 Enclosed as transport modelling shows that there is a need for a Appendix M6-6 southern bypass for Hitchin during the Plan period Appendix M6 – 1 ED142 : Note on Matter 6 / Table A – Infrastructure provision NORTH HERTFORDSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL LOCAL PLAN EXAMINATION ED142: MATTER 6 Note to Inspector Matter 6 / Table A – Infrastructure provision 1. Following the hearing sessions for Matter 6 (Deliverability), the following action has been specified: • NHDC to provide updated version of Table A of Matter 6 Hearing Statement (to included infrastructure for other allocated sites (i.e.
  • (Hitchin (Cambridge Junction)) Order

    (Hitchin (Cambridge Junction)) Order

    NETWORK RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED TRANSPORT AND WORKS ACT 1992 THE NETWORK RAIL (HITCHIN (CAMBRIDGE JUNCTION)) ORDER TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990: REQUEST FOR DEEMED PLANNING PERMISSION TRANSPORT AND WORKS (INQUIRIES PROCEDURE) RULES 2004 DfT Ref: TWA/09/APP/05 CLOSING SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT, NETWORK RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED INTRODUCTION 1. These closing submissions follow the format of the SS Statement of Matters. Before embarking on the exercise, however, it is worth reviewing the position now reached with respect to the objections which made the inquiry necessary. 2. All the landowners (freeholders and those with rights in land) whose interests would be compulsorily acquired under the Order have either withdrawn their objections or are imminently expected to (NHDC, EDF, AWA, NG, Prime Estates, the farm interests etc.); or have not appeared to pursue them (SITA) content, presumably, to rely on their rights under the Compensation Code. AWA are now satisfied that their interests can be secured by the Schedule 12 protective provisions; as are the other statutory utility providers EDF and NG. 3. The objections of the statutory authorities have also been withdrawn. Natural England (who did not object) are content that ecological interests affected by the Order Works, particularly in the Burymead Springs area, can be adequately conserved and protected by conditions (DM Appendix th 7: Minutes of the 11 March 2010 Area Planning Officer’s advice to Committee). The Environment Agency have withdrawn their objection having reached common ground with NR on the protective provisions in Schedule 13 (EA email th 6 May and ‘Statement of Common Ground’).
  • Hitchin Urban Transport Plan

    Hitchin Urban Transport Plan

    Hitchin Urban Transport Plan May 2011 Volume 1 Hitchin Urban Transport Plan 0300 1234 047 www.hertsdirect.org Table of Contents Glossary of Terms ............................................................................................ 0 1 Introduction ............................................................................................ 2 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................... 2 1.2 Structure of the Document ............................................................. 2 2 Background to the UTP Area ................................................................ 4 2.1 Background to the UTP Area ......................................................... 4 2.1.1 Population ...................................................................................... 4 2.1.2 Mode Share ................................................................................... 5 2.1.3 Road Network ................................................................................ 5 2.1.4 Public Transport ............................................................................. 6 2.1.5 Walking .........................................................................................10 2.1.6 Cycling ..........................................................................................10 2.2 Road Side Interviews ....................................................................10 2.3 Development Growth ....................................................................13 2.3.1 Existing
  • Appointment of Her Majesty's Chief

    Appointment of Her Majesty's Chief

    House of Commons Home Affairs Committee Appointment of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Constabulary Third Report of Session 2012–13 Volume II Oral and written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 26 June 2012 HC 183-II Published on 9 August 2012 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £7.50 The Home Affairs Committee The Home Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Home Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon Keith Vaz MP (Labour, Leicester East) (Chair) Nicola Blackwood MP (Conservative, Oxford West and Abingdon) James Clappison MP (Conservative, Hertsmere) Michael Ellis MP (Conservative, Northampton North) Lorraine Fullbrook MP (Conservative, South Ribble) Dr Julian Huppert MP (Liberal Democrat, Cambridge) Steve McCabe MP (Labour, Birmingham Selly Oak) Rt Hon Alun Michael MP (Labour & Co-operative, Cardiff South and Penarth) Bridget Phillipson MP (Labour, Houghton and Sunderland South) Mark Reckless MP (Conservative, Rochester and Strood) Mr David Winnick MP (Labour, Walsall North) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/homeaffairscom. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Tom Healey (Clerk), Richard Benwell (Second Clerk), Ruth Davis (Committee Specialist), Eleanor Scarnell (Committee Specialist), Andy Boyd (Senior Committee Assistant), John Graddon (Committee Support Officer) and Alex Paterson (Select Committee Media Officer).
  • Identifying the Benefits of an Improved Understanding of Network Rail's Costs and Cost Drivers | Final Report

    Identifying the Benefits of an Improved Understanding of Network Rail's Costs and Cost Drivers | Final Report

    Identifying the benefits Office of Rail Regulation of an improved understanding of Network Rail's costs and cost drivers Final Report Our ref: P22781801 May 2015 Client ref: ORR/CT/14-58 Identifying the benefits Office of Rail Regulation of an improved understanding of Network Rail's costs and cost drivers Final Report Our ref: P22781801 May 2015 Client ref: ORR/CT/14-58 Prepared by: Prepared for: Steer Davies Gleave Office of Rail Regulation 28-32 Upper Ground One Kemble Street London SE1 9PD London WC2B 4AN +44 20 7910 5000 www.steerdaviesgleave.com Steer Davies Gleave has prepared this work for Office of Rail Regulation. This work may only be used within the context and scope of work for which Steer Davies Gleave was commissioned and may not be relied upon in part or whole by any third party or be used for any other purpose. Any person choosing to use any part of this work without the express and written permission of Steer Davies Gleave shall be deemed to confirm their agreement to indemnify Steer Davies Gleave for all loss or damage resulting therefrom. Steer Davies Gleave has prepared this work using professional practices and procedures using information available to it at the time and as such any new information could alter the validity of the results and conclusions made. Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... i Introduction ..................................................................................................................................
  • State Aid No N 356/2002 – United Kingdom Network Rail

    State Aid No N 356/2002 – United Kingdom Network Rail

    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 17.07.2002 C(2002)2622fin Subject: State aid No N 356/2002 – United Kingdom Network Rail Sir, Procedure 1. By letter of 30 May 2002 the United Kingdom authorities notified to the Commission a funding package, the purpose of which is to allow the restructuring of Railtrack plc1 under the ownership of Network Rail, a new undertaking that will assume responsibility for ensuring that the main railway infrastructure network in Great Britain, including the Channel Tunnel Rail Link, is managed in the interests of all railway users. The notification was registered by the Secretariat-General of the Commission on 1 June 2002 under No N 356/2002. 2. By letter dated 19 June 2002 and received by the Secretariat-General of the Commission the same day, the UK authorities submitted additional information with regard to the notification. Subsequently, by letters dated 26 and 27 June 2002, further information was submitted to the Commission from the UK authorities. General background 3. Following the privatisation of Britain’s railways, the ownership and operation of the track, signalling and major stations were transferred to a single company, 1 Railtrack plc, the owner and operator of the principal national railway network infrastructure in Great Britain, was put under administration on 7 October 2001 since the company was considered to be (or likely to become) unable to pay its debts. The Right Hon Jack Straw MP Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs Downing Street LONDON SW1A 2AL United Kingdom Rue de la Loi 200, B-1049 Bruxelles/Wetstraat 200, B-1049 Brussel - Belgium Telephone: exchange 32 (0) 2 299.11.11.
  • IJTM/IJCEE PAGE Templatev2

    IJTM/IJCEE PAGE Templatev2

    Int. J. Business Governance and Ethics, Vol. 1, No. 4, 2005 259 Does the criminal law have a role in the corporate setting? Annabelle James The Leeds Law School Leeds Metropolitan University Bronte Hall, Beckett Park, Leeds, LS6 3QS, UK E-mail: [email protected] James Kirkbride and Steve Letza* Faculty of Business and Law Liverpool John Moores University John Foster Building 98 Mount Pleasant, Liverpool L3 5U2 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] *Corresponding author Abstract: The use of criminal law in the corporate setting has risen in the Corporate Governance agenda in recent months. Compelled by the prosecutions of six former Railtrack plc senior managers the paper discusses the relevance of criminal law as a disciplining force on directors and managers. The paper provides a detailed case study of Railtrack plc drawing out the major issues of relevance in applying the criminal law to a large complex company such as Railtrack plc. Keywords: corporate governance; director prosecution. Reference to this paper should be made as follows: James, A., Kirkbride, J. and Letza, S. (2005) ‘Does the criminal law have a role in the corporate setting?’, Int. J. Business Governance and Ethics, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp.259–276. Biographical notes: Annabelle James is Principal Lecturer in law and the subject group leader in crime, justice and society at Leeds Metropolitan University. James Kirkbride is Professor of International Business Law and Dean of the Faculty of Business and Law at Liverpool John Moores University. Steve Letza is Professor of Corporate Governance and Director of the European Centre for Corporate Governance.
  • Volkerview Page 3 MPT Install Two 580 Tonne Bridges

    Volkerview Page 3 MPT Install Two 580 Tonne Bridges

    Autumn 2013 Contents Page 2 VolkerWessels awarded solent submarine cabling contract VolkerView Page 3 MPT install two 580 tonne bridges Proud together Page 4 VolkerFitzpatrick awarded BREEAM ‘Excellent’ for Velocity Brooklands Page 5 VolkerInfra completes Western Power Distribution contract Page 6 VolkerLaser gains external wall insulation standard: PAS 2030 Page 7 VolkerRail completes rail system work at Hitchin Page 8 VolkerStevin protects Tay Road Bridge Page 9 Innovative new alliance starts VolkerFitzpatrick win Project work of the Year at the National Rail Page 10 VolkerFitzpatrick Colas JV Awards 2013 successfully diverts the A45 VolkerFitzpatrick has been awarded the 650 operatives and staff on site every coveted Project of the Year Award at the 24 hours. It was the first blockade of its Page 11 2013 National Rail Awards. kind in 20 years and involved 100,000 VolkerStevin brings new life to man hours and significant liaison with VolkerFitzpatrick received the award for other contractors, the train operator, the Port of Southampton work completed on the Balham Blockade the local council and local residents, as Project, which is part of the Multi Asset well as with client Network Rail. Framework Agreement Package 3 works Page 12 for Network Rail. The main focus of this project was on VolkerGroundEngineering invest extending platforms 1 and 2 at Balham in new Movax impact hammers This challenging project, which was Station, by approximately 42 metres carried out within a ten day blockade eastwards towards an existing bridge during the Christmas period in 2012, saw that crosses Bedford Hill. >cont. page 2 >cont. from page 1 To create sufficient space for this Richard Offord, managing director of environment and I am delighted they new island platform extension, VolkerFitzpatrick commented on the have received this recognition.” VolkerFitzpatrick had to re-align the award: “I’d like to congratulate the existing track through platform 1 onto team.