Lessons from the Case of Southern Rhodesia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lessons from the Case of Southern Rhodesia United Nations Sanctions and South Africa: Lessons from the Case of Southern Rhodesia http://www.aluka.org/action/showMetadata?doi=10.5555/AL.SFF.DOCUMENT.nuun1987_01 Use of the Aluka digital library is subject to Aluka’s Terms and Conditions, available at http://www.aluka.org/page/about/termsConditions.jsp. By using Aluka, you agree that you have read and will abide by the Terms and Conditions. Among other things, the Terms and Conditions provide that the content in the Aluka digital library is only for personal, non-commercial use by authorized users of Aluka in connection with research, scholarship, and education. The content in the Aluka digital library is subject to copyright, with the exception of certain governmental works and very old materials that may be in the public domain under applicable law. Permission must be sought from Aluka and/or the applicable copyright holder in connection with any duplication or distribution of these materials where required by applicable law. Aluka is a not-for-profit initiative dedicated to creating and preserving a digital archive of materials about and from the developing world. For more information about Aluka, please see http://www.aluka.org United Nations Sanctions and South Africa: Lessons from the Case of Southern Rhodesia Alternative title Notes and Documents - United Nations Centre Against ApartheidNo. 1/87 Author/Creator United Nations Centre against Apartheid; Schmidt, Elizabeth S. Publisher United Nations, New York Date 1987-02-00 Resource type Reports Language English Subject Coverage (spatial) South Africa, Zimbabwe Coverage (temporal) 1987 Source Northwestern University Libraries Description THE CASE FOR UNITED NATIONS SANCTIONS AGAINST SOUTH AFRICA. Sanctions imposed by the General Assembly. Sanctions imposed by the Security Council. SANCTIONS IMPOSED BY INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS AND GOVERNMENTS. ARE SANCTIONS PRODUCTIVE? AN ASSESSMENT OF THE SOUTHERN RHODESIAN CASE. Southern Rhodesian sanctions chronology. Short-term effects of sanctions. Sanctions busting: oil and chrome. Collaboration of foreign Governments. Long-term effects of sanctions. Sanctions in conjunction with other factors. South Africa imposes sanctions. Will blacks suffer most. Comparative reflections on South Africa. Format extent 36 page(s) (length/size) http://www.aluka.org/action/showMetadata?doi=10.5555/AL.SFF.DOCUMENT.nuun1987_01 http://www.aluka.org UNITED NATIONS UNITED NATIONS CENTRE AGAINST APARTHEID NOTES AND DOCUMENTS* February 1987 AJG - 6 1987 UNITED NATIONS SANCTIONS AND SOUTH AFRICA: LESSONS FROM THE CASE OF SOUTHERN RHODESIA by Elizabeth S. Schmidt [Note: This paper is published at the request of the against Apartheid. Ms. Schmidt has written extensively on southern Africa. studies were published in the Notes and Documents series in She conducted research in Zimbabwe in 1985 and 1986. Special Committee Two of her 1980 and 1983. The views expressed in this paper are those of the author.] 1/87 *All material in these Notes and Documents may be freely reprinted. Acknowledgement, together with a copy of the publication containing the reprint, would be appreciated. United Nations, New York 10017 8T-03834 -2 CONTENTS Page I. THE CASE FOR UNITED NATIONS SANCTIONS AGAINST SOUTH AFRICA 3 A. Sanctions imposed by the General Assembly 4 B. Sanctions imposed by the Security Council 5 II. SANCTIONS IMPOSED BY INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS AND GOVERNMENTS 6 III. ARE SANCTIONS PRODUCTIVE? AN ASSESSMENT OF THE SOUTHERN RHODESIAN CASE 7 A. Southern Rhodesian sanctions chronology 7 B. Short-term effects of sanctions 9 C. Sanctions busting: oil and chrome 12 D. Collaboration of foreign Governments 17 E. Long-term effects of sanctions 18 F. Sanctions in conjunction with other factors 19 G. South Africa imposes sanctions 22 H. Will blacks suffer most 22 I. Comparative reflections on South Africa 24 -3 - I. THE CASE FOR UNITED NATIONS SANCTIONS AGAINST SOUTH AFRICA For nearly three decades opponents of apartheid have advocated the imposition of comprehensive mandatory economic sanctions against South Africa. Under international law, sanctions are defined as punitive measures economic, diplomatic, cultural, and others - imposed against a State that has violated international law. Their purpose is to pressure the violator to return to compliance with the law. If sanctions are abandoned as a means to achieve this end, military action is the only alternative. Therefore, sanctions are considered to be a non- violent substitute for war. 1/ The United Nations is the only organization that can mandate sanctions that are virtually universal - that is, sanctions that must be applied by all United Nations Member States. Under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations, the Security Council may apply sanctions in order "to maintain or restore international peace and security". Such sanctions may be imposed against a Member State when that State is deemed a "threat to the peace", commits a "breach of the peace" or an "act of aggression" (Article 39). Acceptable measures of non-military coercion include: "complete or partial interruption of economic relations and of rail, sea, air, postal, telegraphic, radio, and other means of communication, and the severance of diplomatic relations" (Article 41). The Security Council may also authorize other actions to be undertaken by air, sea, or land forces, including naval blockades (Article 42). In the case of South Africa, there are several grounds upon which United Nations sanctions should be imposed. Firstly, the system of apartheid, with its features of institutionalized racism, white minority rule, and the denial of fundamental human rights to the African majority and to other black South Africans, has long been considered by United Nations Member States to be a '"threat to the peace". Thus, perpetuation of the status quo is reason enough for sanctions. 2/ Secondly, South Africa's refusal to relinquish the Territory of Namibia, granting it independence under internationally acceptable terms, is a breach of the peace, an act of aggression, and a violation of international law. In 1966, the United Nations General Assembly voted to terminate the League of Nations mandate that had permitted South Africa to govern Namibia and ordered Pretoria to place the Territory under United Nations adminstration. 3/ Subsequent Security Council resolutions upheld the General Assembly's action. 4/ In June 1971, an Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice declared South Africa's continued presence in Namibia to be illegal. 5/ In spite of these actions by the General Assembly, the Security Council and the International Court of Justice, South Africa has refused to grant independence to Namibia and has persisted in its illegal occupation of that Territory. The South African policy of regional destabilization is the third ground upon which United Nations sanctions should be imposed. Since the mid-1970s, South Africa has routinely violated the territorial sovereignty of its neighbors through aerial bombardments, cross border raids, the training and equipping of rebel armies, and full-scale military invasions. Although Angola and Mozambique have suffered most severely at the hands of South Africa and - 4 - its proxies, Botswana, Lesotho, Zambia, and Zimbabwe have also been regular victims of South African attacks. It is estimated that South African destabilization and sanctions against the region have cost the nine southern African States approximately $20 billion since 1980. 6/ South African acl'vities in the region clearly qualify as "acts of aggression" under the Ctiarter of the United Nations. Having established the legitimacy of imposing economic sanctions against South Africa, it is important to clarify the objectives of such action. No one who has seriously considered the question argues that sanctions alone will bring about the destruction of apartheid. Rather, sanctions are regarded as a means of weakening the South African economy, thereby rendering the system more vulnerable to pressure from within. Faced with a rapidly disintegrating economy, South Africa will be less able to finance a war against its own people, as well as against Namibia, and the neighboring States. Ultimately, the combined pressures of the internal political struggle and the constraints of economic sanctions will force Pretoria to negotiate a transfer of power from the minority to the majority. In such a context, the implementation of comprehensive mandatory economic sanctions would be, in the words of Chris Child, "the most effective and single most important contribution those outside South Africa can make to the cause of freedom". 7/ A. Sanctions imposed by the General Assembly The issue of South African sanctions has been on the agenda of the United Nations for nearly 30 years. In 1959, the African National Congress of South Africa appealed to the General Assembly to request that all Member States sever trade links with South Africa. 8/ Acting upon this request in 1962, the General Assembly called upon all members to: a) 1reak diplomatic relations with South Africa or refrain from establishing them; (b) Close ports to ships flying the South African flag; (c) Forbid their ships to enter South African ports; (d) Boycott South African trade; (e) Refuse landing or passage facilities to aircraft belonging to the Government of South Africa or companies registered in that country. The same resolution established the Special Committee against Apartheid to monitor South African policies and requested
Recommended publications
  • Collapse of Rhodesia: Society in Nigeria Population Demographics and the Usmana.Tar Politics of Race 978 1 84511 656 9 Josiah Brownell 978 1 84885 475 8 23
    Josiah Brownell received his Ph.D. from the School of Oriental and African Studies in 2009, and has a J.D. from the University of Virginia School of Law. His research focuses on African history, comparative settler colonialism, and the end of the British Empire. P1: PHB Trim: 138mm × 216mm Top: 1in Gutter: 1in IBBK042-01 IBBK042-Serieslist-Demis ISBN: 978 1 84885 217 4 August 13, 2010 17:24 INTERNATIONAL LIBRARY OF AFRICAN STUDIES Series ISBN: 978 1 84885 217 4 See www.ibtauris.com/ILAS for a full list of titles 18. Mineworkers in Zambia: Labour 25. African Women and Apartheid: and Political Change in Post-Colonial Migration and Settlement in Urban Africa South Africa Miles Larmer Rebekah Lee 978 1 84511 299 8 978 1 84511 819 8 19. Reconstructing the Nation in 26. Islam’s Perfect Stranger: The Life Africa: The Politics of Nationalism in of Mahmud Muhammad Taha, Ghana Muslim Reformer of Sudan Michael Amoah Edward Thomas 978 1 84511 259 2 978 1 84885 004 0 20. Revolt and Protest: Student 27. The Governance of Water and Politics and Activism in Sub-Saharan Sanitation in Africa: Achieving Africa Sustainable Development through Leo Zeilig Partnerships 978 1 84511 476 3 Tim Gray and Amy Stewart 978 1 84885 027 9 22. The Politics of Neoliberal Democracy in Africa: State and Civil 28. The Collapse of Rhodesia: Society in Nigeria Population Demographics and the UsmanA.Tar Politics of Race 978 1 84511 656 9 Josiah Brownell 978 1 84885 475 8 23. Afrikaners in the New South Africa: Identity Politics in a 29.
    [Show full text]
  • NEW/LETTER African Studies Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing,MI 48823
    GS ASSOCIATION OF CONCERNED AFRICA SCHOLARS NEW/LETTER African Studies Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing,MI 48823 Fall 1986 Number 19 CONTENTS .. 1. Letter from the Interim Editor •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 2 RESOURCES & CONFERENCES 2. Inside Africa News ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 3 3. Lutherans Plan Conference on Namibia ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 5 4. New Films on Southern Africa ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 6 NEWS & EVENTS 5. NElI Disowns "The Africans" • •..••••.•..•••• ·• • • • • . • . • . • • • . • • . • • • • • • • • 7 6. Congress Overrides Reagan's Veto of Sanctions •••••••••••••••••••••• 8 7. ACAS Panels at ASA 1986•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 9 8. Divestment Update •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 11 9. The Great African Cook-In •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 13 10. TIAA-CREF Campaign Wins Partial Victory •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 14 , 11. Item Received from University of Dar es Salaam ••••••••••••••••••••• 18 ARTICLES 12. "Law and The State in Tanzania" by Ed Ferguson.••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••19 13. New Publications From Nigeria •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 20 14. "Southern Africa: Who is the 'Dependent' One?" by Carol Thompson •••••••••••••• .•••••••••••••.••.••••••••••••••••••• 22 15. "Sanctions Worked in Rhodesia, White Businessmen Say" by Elizabeth Schmidt ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 24 16. "Zimbabwean Independence - Not For Sale" by Warren "Bud" Day ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
    [Show full text]
  • Rhodesia Or Zimbabwe No Middle Ground in Africa
    Rhodesia or Zimbabwe No Middle Ground in Africa a publication of THE AFRICA FUND associated with the American Committee on Africa 164 Madison Avenue New York, N.Y. 10016 September 1969 Rhodesia or Zimbabwe No Middle Ground in Africa Summer, 1969 Three and one-half years after its unilateral declaration of independence (UDI) from Great Britain; the white minority regime of Rhodesia has been given a mandate by referendum vote of its unrepresentative electorate to prevent African majority rule forever. Twice since 1965 the British had offered compromises to postpone majority rule if provision were made for African advancement. But Britain's original refusal to use force against the rebellion, and the ineffectiveness of inter­ national economic sanctions, left her no leverage to influence Rhodesia's future. The United Nations, under pressure from its Afro-Asian block, will probably continue its sanctions policy. But it will not stop the sanctions' breaking of Rhodesia's neighbors, South Africa and Portuguese Mozambique, or change the unwillingness of the major powers to circumvent them. The constitution approved by the referendum gives the African majority token representation, carefully controlled. It establishes a police state. And it legalizes discrimination against Africans, moving toward apartheid. The African majority now has no recourse excepting its own strength. Britain was responsible, but failed. Most of the world opposed UDI and opposes the new constitution, but the United Nations is unable to prevent the temporary victory of white reaction. Both the African nationalist parties, the Zimbabwe African Peoples Union and the Zimbabwe African National Union, are engaged in guerrilla warfare against the regime, and in under­ ground organization of the people to fight for independence.
    [Show full text]
  • March 2012 Rhodesian Services Association Incorporated
    March 2012 A monthly sitrep for the Rhodesian Services Association Incorporated Registered under the 2005 Charities Act in New Zealand number CC25203 Registered as an Incorporated Society in New Zealand number 2055431 PO Box 13003, Tauranga 3141, New Zealand. Web: www.rhodesianservices.org Secretary’s e-mail [email protected] Editor’s e-mail [email protected] Phone +64 7 576 9500 Fax +64 7 576 9501 To view all previous publications go to our Archives Greetings, Work on the Rhodesia Regiment book project is proceeding with urgency now with a number of people working through the first version of the manuscript. Consensus is that our contracted author Peter Baxter has done a sterling job. We must not lose sight of the fact that this project would not be where it is without the input of hundreds of people around the world, as well as the memory of our family and friends no longer with us. They provide the inspiration that drives us on when some of us sit in front of computers at some stupid hour in the morning, only to nod off in front of the TV or wherever we find a moment to have a cat nap - a bit like back in the day when you found time to sleep whenever the situation presented itself. It is a job that has to be done and we have the people to do it - be assured. We still have various requests for information in relation to the Rhodesia Regiment book. Please refer to the section on the book further on in this newsletter.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Special Committee on the Situation
    Report of the Special Committee on the Situation with regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples. Annex. Activities of Foreign Ecnomic and Other Interests which are impeding the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples in Southern Rhodesia, Namibia and Territories under Portuguese Domination and in All Other Territories under Colonial Domination and Efforts to Eliminate Colonialism, Apartheid and Racial Discrimination in Southern Africa http://www.aluka.org/action/showMetadata?doi=10.5555/AL.SFF.DOCUMENT.bmun004 Use of the Aluka digital library is subject to Aluka’s Terms and Conditions, available at http://www.aluka.org/page/about/termsConditions.jsp. By using Aluka, you agree that you have read and will abide by the Terms and Conditions. Among other things, the Terms and Conditions provide that the content in the Aluka digital library is only for personal, non-commercial use by authorized users of Aluka in connection with research, scholarship, and education. The content in the Aluka digital library is subject to copyright, with the exception of certain governmental works and very old materials that may be in the public domain under applicable law. Permission must be sought from Aluka and/or the applicable copyright holder in connection with any duplication or distribution of these materials where required by applicable law. Aluka is a not-for-profit initiative dedicated to creating and preserving a digital archive of materials about and from the developing world. For more information about Aluka, please see http://www.aluka.org Report of the Special Committee on the Situation with regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly
    UNITED NATIONS GENERAL A/7200/Add.l* ASSEMBLY 30 September 1968 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH Twenty-third session Agenda item 23 REPORT OF THE SPECIAL COMMI'ITEE 1'\N THE SI'IUATION vliTH REGARD TO THE IlilPIEN£liiTATICN OF 'IRE IECIARATICN ON 'IHB GRANTIEG OF INDEPENDENCE TO COlONIAL COUNTRIES AND PEOPLES (covering its work during 1968) Rapporteur: Mr. Abdul Samad GHAUS (Afghanistan) CHAPTER VI SOUTHERN RHODESIA I CONSillERATION BY THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE 1. The Special Committee considered the question of Southern Rhodesia at its 580th to 582nd meetings on 6 and 7 March 1968, in the light of the situation arising from the execution of three Africans in the Territory. Upon being informed ' of the execution of two more Afri~ans there, the Special Committee again took up the item at its 584th to 590th meetings between 11 and 19 March. 2. In its consideration of this item, the Special Committee took into account the relevant provisions of General Assembly resolution 2326 (XXII) of 16 December 1967, as well as other resolutions of the General Assembly concerning Southern Rhodesia, particularly resolution 2262 (XXII) of 3 November 1967, by operative paragraph 20 of ·Hhich the Assembly requested the Speci~l Committee "to continue to keep the situation in the Territory under review". 3. During the consideration of the item, the Special Committee had before it a working paper prepared by the Secretariat (see annex) containing information on action previously t~ken by the Special Committee and the General Assembly and by the Security Council, as well as on the latest developments concerning the Territory.
    [Show full text]
  • Web04-Rhd 2020-2
    de LA rHodésie Au ZimbAbwe 18 AvriL 1980 Dans le processus de décolonisation du continent africain, la Rhodésie a constitué jusqu’à l’indépendance du Zimbabwe un cas tout à fait à part. D’abord habité par des Bochimans, le pays est peuplé à partir du VIe siècle par les Shonas, groupe de tribus parlant des langues très proches, d’origine bantoue. Ils succèdent à des éleveurs bochimans et créent de grands royaumes d’éleveurs, riches en minerais d’or et de cuivre (Zimbabwe (1) jusqu’au XVe siècle, puis Mo- nomatapa jusqu’à l’arrivée des Anglais). Ils nous sont connus par les récits des Portugais qui faisaient le commerce de l’or avec les ports de l’Océan indien, et furent les premiers colons. En 1830, le Sud et l’Ouest du plateau shona sont envahis par une ethnie zou- lou de tradition très guerrière, les Ndebele. Puis Britanniques et Boers du Trans- vaal se disputent le contrôle du territoire par une politique de traités avec les chefs locaux. Cecil Rhodes prend Paul Kruger de vitesse. Fondateur et président du groupe de production de diamant De Beers, puis premier ministre de la pro- vince britannique du Cap, il a une grande ambition : conquérir de nouveaux ter- ritoires au profit de la Couronne, étendre à l’Afrique noire l’empire de Victoria, implanter des colons le long d’une ligne ferroviaire qui relierait Le Cap au Caire. Sur proposition du premier ministre lord Salisbury, une charte royale crée en 1889 la British South Africa Company (BSAC), société commerciale de droit privé, dotée de considérables prérogatives de puissance publique.
    [Show full text]
  • South Australia's First Expedition
    South Australia’s First Expedition: three generations of settler-colonial social mobility. by Heidi Ing Thesis submitted to Flinders University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy College of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences 9 October 2020 i Table of Contents List of Figures ........................................................................................................................ ii List of Tables ........................................................................................................................ iii Thesis Summary ................................................................................................................... vi Declaration .......................................................................................................................... vii Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................... viii Chapter One: Following Immigrants on the Move .................................................................. 1 Chapter Two: Selling South Australia .................................................................................... 35 Chapter Three: South Australia’s First Expedition ................................................................. 58 Chapter Four: Locating South Australia’s First Expedition .................................................... 87 Chapter Five: Career Mobility of the First Expedition. ........................................................ 103 Chapter Six: Locating
    [Show full text]
  • Keeping the Spirit Alive
    ISSN 0816-6315 A contact magazine covering 6 continents Vol. 21 No. 3 January - March, 2006 Keeping the Spirit Alive 1 A RHODIE IN ANTARCTICA By Lewis Walter, Fish Hoek. In the bad old days of uncontrolled whaling in Antarctica, the hardened whalers had a saying “Beyond 40 degrees South there is no law. Beyond 50 degrees South there is no God”. Today some little ships venture into the icy waters far beyond these limits, one of them being a former Russian research vessel, the Grigoriy Mikheev. Laying claim to Antarctica In the afternoon of the 24th we reached Vernadsky Island where we visited the Ukranian research station with its most hospitable staff. After a tour of the station, I handed them the Rhodesian flag which is now proudly displayed in their bar. At 65°15’ South/64°16’ West this is possibly the furthest South a Rhodesian flag has ever been. It bears the Flame Lily Foundation e-mail address, and perhaps some other wandering Rhodie will see it one day and send a message. Among other mementoes in the bar is a fine collection of bras, kindly donated by passing lady visitors amidst much cheering. One of the bras now has a Zimbabwe $500 note tucked into it! The Grogoriy Mikheev Weighing only 2000 tons, and with 46 passengers on board, she left the Argentinian port of Ushaia, near Cape Horn, on 19 December 2005 and headed down the Beagle Channel and into the Drake Passage. This is renowned as one of the world’s roughest stretches of ocean, and it lived up to its reputation with a Force 8 Gale and huge seas which had many of the passengers and even some of the crew seasick.
    [Show full text]
  • Selous Scouts: Rhodesian Counter-Insurgency Specialists
    2 Also by Peter Baxter: Rhodesia: Last Outpost of the British Empire France in Centrafrique (Africa@War Vol 2) eBook edition 2012 Co-published in 2011 by: Helion & Company Limited 26 Willow Road Solihull West Midlands B91 1UE England Tel. 0121 705 3393 Fax 0121 711 4075 Email: [email protected] Website: www.helion.co.uk and 30° South Publishers (Pty) Ltd. 16 Ivy Road Pinetown 3610 South Africa Email: [email protected] Website: www.30degreessouth.co.za Text © Peter Baxter, 2011 Designed & typeset by 30° South Publishers (Pty) Ltd., South Africa Cover design by 30° South Publishers (Pty) Ltd., South Africa Printed by Henry Ling Limited, Dorchester, Dorset, UK ISBN 978-1-907677-38-0 eBook ISBN 9781908916020 British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, manipulated in any retrieval system, or transmitted in any mechanical, electronic form or by any other means, without the prior written authority of the publishers, except for short extracts in media reviews. Any person who engages in any unauthorized activity in relation to this publication shall be liable to criminal prosecution and claims for civil and criminal damages. 3 4 CONTENTS Glossary and abbreviations Foreword Prelude: A brief history of war in Rhodesia Chapter One: The formation of the Selous Scouts Chapter Two: Operations commence Chapter Three: External operations—terrorizing the terrorists Chapter Four: Intelligence and the
    [Show full text]
  • Kith and Kin? Rhodesia's White Settlers and Britain, 1939
    KITH AND KIN? RHODESIA’S WHITE SETTLERS AND BRITAIN, 1939 -1980 GEORGE BISHI THIS THESIS HAS BEEN SUBMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE FACULTY OF THE HUMANITIES FOR THE CENTRE FOR AFRICA STUDIES AT THE UNIVERSITY OF THE FREE STATE SUPERVISOR: PROF. I.R. PHIMISTER CO-SUPERVISORS: DR. A. STEVENSON DR. C. HOLDRIDGE NOVEMBER 2018 Declaration I declare that the thesis hereby submitted by me for the Doctor of Philosophy degree at the University of the Free State is my own independent work and I have not previously submitted it at another university or institution for any degree, diploma, or other qualification. I furthermore cede copyright of the dissertation in favour of the University of the Free State. George Bishi ……………………………………… Dedication To my family, Hannah and above all to God Almighty. Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................ i Opsomming ............................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements .................................................................................................. iii Glossary ...................................................................................................................... v Graphs and Cartoons ............................................................................................... vii Chapter One ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SOUTHERN AFRICA NEWS BULLETIN Committee on Southern Africa, National Student Christian Federation, 475 Riverside Drive, New York, New York 10027
    SOUTHERN AFRICA NEWS BULLETIN Committee on Southern Africa, National Student Christian Federation, 475 Riverside Drive, New York, New York 10027. Room 754. RHODESIA NEWS SUMMARY cok of July 21 - 27 EDITORIALS AND PERSONAL COMMENTS East Africaand Rhodesia - July 14 In Ja-n-uary Iir.-Wilson told Commonwealth Prime .Ministers that sanctions would bring down the Rhodesian Government in weeks, not ;.onths; and President Kaunda incautiously believed him. East Africa and Rhodesia was almost alone in ridiculing that hypothesis. Now, six full months later, all the world knows that the Rhodesians have beaten the oil embargo, which was supposed to give the coup de grce; and the statistics of exports through Beira prove that the counter-measures to sanctions have been surprisingly successful." Ronald Robson, BBC Central African Correspondent Mr. Robson, who was recently forced to leave Rhodesia, says that Rhodesian jamming of the British Governments new radio station at Francistown, Bechuanaland, appears to be effective. He commented that the Rhodesian economy was tougher than he expected it to be. (LT, July 26 andJohannesburg Star, July 30) Univsrsity College of Rhodesia Closed The University College of Rhodesia was closed on July 2 for four weeks by its acting principal following a dawn swoop by Rhodesian security police who arrested 9 white lecturers and 10 students. London Times - July 27 T-h-e-p a-ice action came after the suspensions by the college authorities yesterday of 31 students, mostly African, for their part in the disturbances at the graduation ceremony on the campus on July 16. The nine lecturers and one the the ten students were served with detention orders signed by Mr.
    [Show full text]