DOCSLIB.ORG

Family Participation Rates in Nutrition Assistance Programs: 2015 Household Economics Studies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Family Participation Rates in Nutrition Assistance Programs: 2015 Household Economics Studies Family Participation Rates in Nutrition Assistance Programs: 2015 Household Economics Studies Current Population Reports Liza C. Valle and Daniel J. Perez-Lopez P70BR-161 January 2020 INTRODUCTION brief, nutrition assistance refers to either participation in one of the major means-tested federal food support Millions of Americans rely on public and private sup- programs or receipt of community-based support. port to help meet their nutritional needs. This brief The federal food support programs included in this looks at family and individual participation in nutri- analysis are the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance tion assistance programs in calendar year 2015 as Program (SNAP), formerly known as the Food Stamp reported in Wave 3 of the 2014 Panel of the Survey Program; free or reduced-price meals provided by of Income and Program Participation (SIPP).1, 2 In this the School Breakfast Program and the National ¹ The U.S. Census Bureau reviewed this data product for School Lunch Program; and the Special Supplemental unauthorized disclosure of confidential information and has Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children approved the disclosure avoidance practices applied to this release. CBDRB-FY19-POP001-0032. (WIC). Community-based nutrition assistance includes ² In this report, we determined family participation in these nutri- food support offered by government social service tion programs if the family was present in the survey in the month of December 2015 and if any family member received benefits at agencies, community or religious charitable organiza- any time during calendar year 2015. WIC and free or reduced-price tions, family, friends, or some other entity. breakfast or lunch programs had additional requirements such as the presence of children under the age of 5 and children between the ages of 5 and 18, respectively. Figure 1. Number of U.S. Families Participating in Nutrition Assistance: 2015 (In millions) ­ ­ SNAP Free or reduced-price WIC Community-based school breakfast or lunch nutrition assistance Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) 2014 Panel, Wave 3. RESULTS Figure 1 shows that in 2015, 20.8 WHAT IS SIPP? million families participated The Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) is a nation- in SNAP, 15.0 million in free or ally representative panel survey administered by the U.S. Census reduced-price school breakfast Bureau that collects information on the short-term dynamics of or lunch, 5.2 million received WIC employment, income, household composition, and eligibility and participation in government assistance programs. It is a lead- benefits, and 5.5 million partici- ing source of information on specific topics related to economic pated in community-based nutri- well-being, family dynamics, education, wealth and assets, health tion assistance.3, 4 insurance, childcare, and food security. Each SIPP panel follows Table 1 presents family partici- individuals for several years, providing monthly data that measure pation rates for SNAP.5 In 2015, changes in household and family composition and economic cir- cumstances over time. For more information, please visit the SIPP approximately 20.8 million fami- Web site at <www.census.gov/sipp>. lies, or 14.8 percent of the 141.1 million families in the United States, participated in SNAP. Table In 2015, approximately 30.0 participation rate of 8.0 2 shows family participation rates percent of the 17.4 million families percent.7 in the free or reduced-price school with children under the age of 5 • Families with three or more breakfast or lunch programs for participated in the WIC program children under the age of 18 families with children aged 5 to and 3.9 percent of the 141.1 mil- had higher participation rates 18. In 2015, approximately 46.4 lion families in the United States in SNAP (36.9 percent) than percent of the 32.3 million families (approximately 5.5 million fami- those with fewer children. with children aged 5 to 18 par- lies) received community-based ticipated in the free or reduced- nutrition assistance. • Approximately 44.9 percent price school breakfast or lunch of families whose incomes programs. HIGHLIGHTS were below 100 percent of their poverty threshold Table 3 shows participation rates SNAP 8 in the WIC program for families received SNAP benefits. • Families with a female refer- with children under the age of 5 ence person without a spouse and Table 4 shows rates of com- present had the highest 7 Federal surveys, including the 2014 munity- based nutrition assistance. SIPP Panel, give respondents the option of participation rate in the SNAP reporting more than one race. These data program in 2015.6 can be shown in two ways: (1) as mutually 3 The estimates in this report (which may exclusive from other race groups, which be presented in the text and tables) are may be denoted by “alone,” or (2) not based on responses from a sample of the • Married-couple families were mutually exclusive with other race groups, population and may differ from the actual less likely to participate in denoted by “alone or in combination with values because of sampling variability other race groups.” In this brief, we use the and other factors. As a result, apparent SNAP than other families. first method. differences between the estimates for two 8 Following the Office of Management or more groups may not be statistically • Families with a reference per- and Budget's Statistical Policy Directive significant. All comparative statements 14, the Census Bureau uses a set of money have undergone statistical testing and are son aged 65 and older were income thresholds that vary by family size significant at the 90 percent confidence less likely to participate in and composition to determine who is in level, unless otherwise indicated. poverty. If a family's total income is less than 4 The estimates for WIC and community- SNAP than were families with the family's threshold, then that family and based nutrition assistance are not signifi- younger reference persons. every individual in it is considered in pov- cantly different. erty. The official poverty thresholds do not ⁵ The Census Bureau generally defines vary geographically, but they are updated a family as two or more individuals living • Families with a Black, non- for inflation using the Consumer Price Index together and related by birth, marriage, or Hispanic reference person had (CPI-U). The official poverty definition uses adoption. Unrelated individuals are defined money income before taxes and does not as people of any age who are not mem- a SNAP participation rate of include capital gains or noncash benefits bers of families. For the purposes of this 29.1 percent, while families (such as public housing, Medicaid, and food analysis, we treat unrelated individuals as stamps). one-person families. See <www.census.gov with an Asian, non-Hispanic In 2015, 100 percent of the poverty /programs-surveys/cps/technical reference person had a SNAP threshold for a family of four with two adults -documentation/subject-definitions and two children was $24,036, and 200 .html#family> and <www.census.gov percent of the threshold was $48,072. For /programs-surveys/cps/technical additional details, see <www.census.gov -documentation/subject-definitions 6 Family reference person refers to the /topics/income-poverty/poverty/guidance .html#unrelatedindividuals>. parent or designated adult in a family. /poverty-measures.html>. 2 U.S. Census Bureau FREE OR REDUCED-PRICE SCHOOL BREAKFAST OR DESCRIPTION OF NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS LUNCH Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP): Of families with a child aged 5 Administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) to 18 who has not yet graduated Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), SNAP is, in terms of number of from high school: people covered and federal funds spent, the largest nutrition pro- • About 68.3 percent of fami- gram offered to low-income individuals and families. Individuals lies with a female reference must apply in the state in which they reside. Each state has its person with no spouse present own application, and income and resource requirements may received free or reduced-price vary. Qualified individuals receive their SNAP benefits on an school breakfast or lunch, Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT) card that can be used to buy while 52.0 percent of families groceries at authorized food stores and retailers. The EBT can with a male reference person also be used to purchase food in participating farmer’s markets.1 with no spouse present par- ticipated in these programs. Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC): The WIC program, also administered by • Families where the reference FNS, provides grants to states for supplemental foods (such as person was between the ages iron-fortified formula, milk, vegetable and fruit juices), health of 15 and 34 had a higher care referrals, and nutrition education for low-income preg- participation rate (65.0 per- nant and postpartum women, as well as for infants and children cent) in free or reduced-price under age 5. Applicants must meet residence and nutrition risk school breakfast or lunch requirements.2 programs than those in which the reference person was 35 School Breakfast Program and National School Lunch Program or over. (SBP and NSLP): The SBP and NSLP, funded by FNS and admin- istered by local school food authorities, provide free or low-cost • Families with three or more breakfasts and lunches in schools and residential childcare insti- children between the ages of tutions. Families can apply for free or reduced-price meals at any 5 and 18 had higher participa- time during the school year, and eligibility is based on household tion (63.1 percent) in free or income and family size. Children in families that receive SNAP reduced-price school break- and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families are automati- fast or lunch programs than cally qualified for free school meals.3 Moreover, there are some families with fewer children in schools and school districts in low-income areas that additionally that age range.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wic, Medicaid, and Snap: Teaming up to Improve the Health of Women and Children
    WIC, MEDICAID, AND SNAP: TEAMING UP TO IMPROVE THE HEALTH OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN THE IMPORTANCE OF THE IMPORTANCE NWA’S MISSION MEDICAID FOR WIC OF SNAP FOR WIC PARTICIPANTS PARTICIPANTS The National The vast majority of WIC participants WIC benefits are not meant to cover WIC Association rely on Medicaid and/or the Children’s a full grocery basket of food each (NWA) provides its Health Insurance Program (CHIP)— month. Instead, targeted foods members with tools which provides coverage to uninsured address nutritional gaps in the diets of and leadership to children who are not eligible for pregnant women, new mothers, and expand and sustain Medicaid, but cannot afford private young children, For families lacking effective nutrition insurance—for healthcare coverage.3 resources to afford foods beyond the services for In addition to covering nearly half scope of WIC, SNAP plays a vital role. mothers and young of all births in the US, Medicaid A large body of research demonstrates children. provides a range of prenatal and that SNAP reduces the number of postpartum services that are key households facing food insecurity.7 8 to improving outcomes for WIC This is particularly true of households mothers and babies during these with children, with conservative vital periods.4 Most states’ Medicaid estimates attributing a reduction in OVERVIEW OF WIC programs cover access to prenatal childhood food insecurity of at least The Special Supplemental Nutrition vitamins, ultrasounds, amniocentesis, 8.1% to SNAP.9 Other studies assert Program for Women, Infants, and chorionic villus sampling (CVS) tests, that a mere six months of participation Children (WIC), the nation’s premier genetic counseling, breast pumps, in SNAP reduces the likelihood of public health nutrition program, has and postpartum home visiting.5 This food insecurity by one-third compared improved the health of women, infants, coverage plays a critical role in to similarly situated households.10 and children for 46 years.
    [Show full text]
  • FCC Should Evaluate the Efficiency and Effectiveness of the Lifeline Program
    United States Government Accountability Office T estimony Before the Subcommittee on Communications, Technology, Innovation and the Internet, Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, U.S. S enate For Release on Delivery Expected at 9:30 a.m. ET Tuesday, June 2, 2015 TELECOMMUNICATIONS FCC Should Evaluate the Efficiency and Effectiveness of the Lifeline Program Statement of Michael Clements, Acting Director Physical Infrastructure Issues ACCESSIBLE VERSION GAO-15-638T Letter Letter Chairman Wicker, Ranking Member Schatz, and Members of the Subcommittee: I am pleased to be here today as you discuss the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) efforts to promote telephone subscribership among low-income households. Through the Lifeline program, companies provide discounts to eligible low-income households for telephone service. The Lifeline program supports these companies through the Universal Service Fund, which is funded through mandatory fees that are usually passed along to consumers through a charge applied to their monthly telephone bills. The Lifeline program was created in the mid-1980s and has traditionally centered on wireline residential telephone service. However, FCC actions in 2005 and 2008 paved the way for prepaid wireless companies to begin offering Lifeline service in 2008; at the time, FCC did not quantify or estimate the potential increases in participation from its decision. Subsequently, Lifeline experienced rapid growth in participation and disbursements. In particular, from mid-2008 to mid-2012, Lifeline
    [Show full text]
  • Section 1: Evaluating Borrower Income Chapter 4
    HB-1-3550 CHAPTER 4: BORROWER ELIGIBILITY 4.1 OVERVIEW Ensuring that all applicants served are eligible and receive the correct amount of assistance is a significant responsibility of Loan Originators and Loan Approval Officials. A borrower must be income-eligible, demonstrate a credit history that indicates ability and willingness to repay a loan, and meet a variety of other program requirements. This chapter provides guidance for each of these areas. • Section 1: Evaluating Borrower Income provides instructions for calculating and verifying annual, adjusted, and repayment income. • Section 2: Evaluating Borrower Assets discusses Agency requirements for cash contributions to the purchase and methods for computing income from assets. • Section 3: Credit History identifies indicators of acceptable and unacceptable credit and provides instructions for reviewing an applicant’s credit history. • Section 4: Other Eligibility Requirements addresses a variety of other requirements applicants must meet to be eligible for the program. • Section 5: Processing the Certificate of Eligibility provides policies and procedures for processing Form FD 1944-59, Certificate of Eligibility. SECTION 1: EVALUATING BORROWER INCOME 4.2 OVERVIEW [7 CFR 3550.53(a) and (g), 7 CFR 3550.54] Loan Originators use income information to: (1) help determine whether an applicant is eligible for a loan; (2) calculate the applicant’s ability to repay a loan; and (3) determine the amount of the loan and the amount of payment subsidy the household can obtain. When reviewing an applicant’s repayment income, the Loan Originator must determine whether the income is stable and dependable. This will typically be accomplished by reviewing information provided in the application, paystubs, tax returns, and oral verifications.
    [Show full text]
  • SPS 2018-19 Free Reduced Lunch Application Complete.Pdf
    FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT FREE AND REDUCED-PRICE SCHOOL MEALS Dear Parent/Guardian: Children need healthy meals to learn. Skiatook Public Schools offers healthy meals every school day. Breakfast costs $1.35 (elementary) & $1.60 (secondary); lunch costs $2.50 (elementary) & $2.75 (secondary). Your children may qualify for free meals or for reduced-price meals. Reduced-price is $0.30 for breakfast and $0.40 for lunch. This packet includes an application for free or reduced-price meal benefits and a set of detailed instructions. Below are some common questions and answers to help you with the application process. 1. WHO CAN GET FREE OR REDUCED-PRICE MEALS? All children in households receiving benefits from Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), Food Distribution Program on Indian Reservations (FDPIR), or Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) are eligible for free meals. Foster children who are under the legal responsibility of a foster care agency or court are eligible for free meals. Children participating in their school’s Head Start program are eligible for free meals. Children who meet the definition of homeless, runaway, or migrant are eligible for free meals. Children may receive free or reduced-price meals if your household’s income is within the limits on the Federal Income Eligibility Guidelines. Your children may qualify for free or reduced-price meals if your household income falls at or below the limits on this chart. FEDERAL ELIGIBILITY INCOME CHART for School Year: 2019 Every Two Household Size Yearly Monthly Twice Per Month Weekly Weeks 1 22,459 1,872 936 864 432 2 30,451 2,538 1,269 1,172 586 3 38,443 3,204 1,602 1,479 740 4 46,435 3,870 1,935 1,786 893 5 54,427 4,536 2,268 2,094 1,047 6 62.419 5,202 2,601 2,401 1,201 7 70,411 5,868 2,934 2,709 1,355 8 78,403 6,534 3,267 3,016 1,508 Each additional 7,992 666 333 308 154 person: 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Security Programs in the United States
    FOOD AND NUTRITION ASSISTANCE are provided to States to encourage maintaining program spend- ing levels. Families cannot spend more than five cumulative years on TANF. States can specify fewer years, and exempt up to 20% of the caseload from the time limit. After the time limit is exceeded, they can elect to provide noncash assistance and vouchers to families using Social Services Block Grant or State funds. Child care funding is provided to help more mothers move into jobs. Women on welfare continue to receive health coverage for their families, including a year or more of transitional Medicaid when they leave welfare for work. To be eligible for TANF block grants, States must operate a child support enforcement program meeting Federal requirements. The Federal Case Registry and National Directory of New Hires will be used to track delinquent parents across State lines. Child support can be withheld directly from wages, and paternity estab- lishment is streamlined; cash assistance will be reduced by at least 25% in cases of failure to cooperate with paternity establish- ment. The law establishes uniform interstate child support laws, central registries of child support orders and collections, and toughened enforcement of child support. Unmarried minor parents are required to live with a respon- sible adult or in an adult-supervised setting and participate in educational and training activities in order to receive assistance. Efforts are to be under taken to prevent nonmarital teen pregnancy. Food and The U.S. Department of Agriculture provides children and Nutrition needy families access to a more healthful diet through its food assistance programs and comprehensive nutrition education Assistance efforts, and provides farmers an outlet for the distribution of food purchased under farmer assistance authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Child Nutrition Reauthorization
    Updated February 26, 2021 Child Nutrition Reauthorization (CNR): An Overview Introduction example, the law created the Community Eligibility Child nutrition reauthorization (CNR) refers to Congress’s Provision, an option within NSLP/SBP that allows eligible process of making changes to the permanent statutes that schools to provide free meals to all students. The law also authorize the child nutrition programs, the Special required USDA to update the nutrition standards for school Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and meals and establish nutrition standards for other foods sold Children (WIC), and related activities: in schools during the school day. For WIC, the law included the requirement that states transition, by October 1, 2020, the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act, from their primarily paper voucher-based WIC benefits to the Child Nutrition Act of 1966, and Electronic Benefits Transfer (EBT). In some cases, the new (less often) Section 32 of the Act of August 24, 1935, policies were described within the statute; in other cases, which transfers funds to the child nutrition programs the details were laid out in USDA-promulgated regulations. annually. Recent Reauthorization Efforts The most recent CNR was the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids th Act of 2010 (P.L. 111-296). Some of the authorities created During the 114 Congress, the committees then exercising or extended in that law expired on September 30, 2015. jurisdiction (the House Education and Workforce Committee and Senate Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry However, the vast majority of program operations have continued with funding provided by appropriations acts. Committee) marked up CNR bills but reauthorization was not completed (see CRS Report R44373, Tracking Child Programs Typically Included in CNR Nutrition Reauthorization in the 114th Congress: An Overview).
    [Show full text]
  • Using Behavioral Science to Improve the WIC Experience Lessons for the Field from San Jose, California
    Using Behavioral Science to Improve the WIC Experience Lessons for the field from San Jose, California Authors: Dani Grodsky, Antonia Violante, Anthony Barrows; ideas42 Wendi Gosliner; Nutrition Policy Institute May 2017 ideas42 USING BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE TO IMPROVE THE WIC EXPERIENCE: Lessons for the field from San Jose, California | 1 Contents Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................................2 About ideas42 .................................................................................................................................2 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................3 Introduction .....................................................................................................................................6 Section A: Program Logistics: Enrolling and Persisting in WIC ..............................................8 Section B: Building Nutrition Knowledge and Intentions ......................................................19 Section C: Follow Through of Health-Promoting Behaviors ............................................... 27 Section D: Exiting the WIC Program ........................................................................................ 43 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................... 53 Appendices ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wic Certification Overview Module
    WIC CERTIFICATION OVERVIEW MODULE Updated: 10/2020 WIC Certification Overview Module WIC Appointments SECTION 1 Objectives After this section, you will be able to • Understand the layout and purpose of the Minnesota Operations Manual. • List the 4 main types of WIC appointments/visits that WIC staff perform in clinic • Describe what happens during each appointment type • State the certification period for each participant category • Observe the 4 main types of appointments Overview There are four basic appointment/visit types staff perform in the WIC clinic. Understanding these will help you better understand day-to-day WIC operations. It will also help you understand the frequency in which a WIC participant is expected to come to WIC and the purpose for each of these visits. The activities that occur within these appointments are outlined by USDA regulations. Minnesota Operations Manual (MOM) Federal regulations outline “rules” for the WIC program. The policies and procedures Minnesota WIC has developed to meet these regulations are found in the Minnesota Operations Manual (MOM). MOM is on the MDH WIC website under the section Local Agency /Finance and Program Management/ MN Operations Manual (MOM). MOM is arranged into chapters, and under each chapter are various sections. When a policy is referred to, it’s usually listed as numbers, i.e., MOM 5.2.1 refers to Chapter 5, Section 2, and Part 1 of MOM. Charts, forms, or other references related to a Section of MOM are found in the Exhibit section under each Chapter to which it pertains. MOM is referenced throughout these training modules.
    [Show full text]
  • The Accompanying Notes Are an Integral Part of These Statements
    i Federal Housing Administration This Annual Management Report (AMR) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 provides the Federal Housing Administration’s financial and summary performance information in accordance with OMB Circular A-136, Financial Reporting Requirements. The Agency’s AMR is available on the website below. FHA welcomes feedback on the form and content of this report. http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/documents/huddoc?id=fhafy15annualmgmntrpt.pdf. This report is divided into four sections: A Message from the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Housing is a letter that highlights FHA’s mission, vision, achievements for the year and communicates the direction and priorities of the Agency. Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) defines the organization’s mission, program activities, performance goals and objectives, and includes management’s assurances regarding compliance with relevant financial management legislation. Principal Financial Statements includes Financial Statements and Notes to the Financial Statements. Auditor’s Report on the Federal Housing Administration’s (FHA) fiscal year 2015 financial statements, internal controls and compliance with laws and regulations. A MESSAGE FROM THE PRINCIPAL DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY November 16, 2015 TO THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES, MEMBERS OF THE HOUSING INDUSTRY AND THE AMERICAN PUBLIC: In its 81 year history, FHA has helped more than 44 million families purchase a home, produced and preserved tens of thousands of units of affordable rental housing, and created access to critical healthcare facilities. This work has been a necessary part of creating and maintaining pathways to the middle class, as well as ensuring that everyone has access to appropriate housing of their choosing.
    [Show full text]
  • A Primer on WIC: the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children
    A Primer on WIC: The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children Randy Alison Aussenberg Specialist in Nutrition Assistance Policy Julia E. Kortrey Research Associate July 21, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R44115 WIC: The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children Summary The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) provides nutrition-rich foods, nutrition education (including breastfeeding promotion and support), and health care and social services referrals to eligible low-income women, infants, and children. In FY2014, approximately 8.3 million people participated in WIC each month. WIC is authorized by the Child Nutrition Act, as is the related WIC Farmers’ Market Nutrition Program (WIC FMNP). WIC, WIC FMNP, school meals, and the other child nutrition programs are typically reauthorized together; these programs were last reauthorized in the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 (P.L. 111-296). WIC’s funding is discretionary, and the bulk of program funds are allocated via formula grant to state agencies for food costs and “Nutrition Services and Administration.” In FY2014, there were 90 state agencies (50 states, District of Columbia, 5 U.S. territories, and 34 Indian Tribal Organizations). These agencies operate the program through local WIC agencies and clinics. The program obligated over $7 billion in federal funds in FY2014. WIC has a number of federal and state eligibility rules, including categorical, financial, and nutritional risk. Participants must fall into one of WIC’s participant categories: pregnant, post- partum, and breastfeeding women; infants; or children (under five years of age).
    [Show full text]
  • Nevada WIC CARES Shopping and Delivery Program Report
    Nevada Women, Infants, and Children CARES Shopping and Delivery Program Provided by Dignity Health and Catholic Charities Final Report January 2021 Department of Health and Human Services Division of Public and Behavioral Health Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 3 INTRODUCTION 4 WIC SHOPPING DURING COVID-19 5 WIC REDEMPTION INFOGRAPHIC 6 WIC ONLINE ORDERING 7 CARES ACT FUNDS FOR WIC FOOD DELIVERY 8 WIC CARES SHOPPING AGENCIES 9 POLICIES/PROCEDURES 10 SHOPPING/DELIVERY PROCEDURES 10 POLICIES 12 CLINIC PROCESS AID 12 NOTABLE PREPARATION STEPS 15 SHOPPING AND DELIVERY OF- AGENCY DATA 16 CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NORTHERN NEVADA 17 CARSON CITY HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES 18 THREE SQUARE FOOD BANK 19 DIGNITY HEALTH ST. ROSE 21 NYE COMMUNITY COALITIONS 22 STATEWIDE DATA AND DEMOGRAPHICS 23 LESSONS LEARNED 24 PARTICIPANT FEEDBACK AND STORIES 25 CONCLUSION 29 APPENDIX 30 ACRONYM GLOSSARY 30 WIC IN THE NEWS 30 RESOURCES 30 THREE SQUARE FOOD BANK WIC CARES PILOT TOOL KIT 31 PAGE 2 Acknowledgements The Nevada Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Division of Public and Behavioral Health (DPBH) would like to thank the following partners for their work and support as shopping agencies: • Catholic Charities of Northern Nevada (CCNN) • Three Square Food Bank (TS) o TCMI Church o East Valley Family Services o HopeLink of Southern Nevada • Nye Community Coalitions (NyECC) • St. Rose Dignity Health • Carson City Health and Human Service (CCHHS) Special thank you to all the dedicated Nevada WIC Inter-Tribal Council of Nevada (ITCN) WIC agency employees who continue to work tirelessly to meet the needs of Nevada WIC participants, and for their amazing ability to pivot services effectively and efficiently amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • LDCAA Board Meeting Packet
    Little Dixie Community Action Agency, Inc. Board of Directors Meeting A P R I L 9 , 2 0 1 9 • 1 0 : 0 0 A M H O M E O W N E R S H I P C E N T E R 5 0 0 E A S T R O S E W O O D - H U G O , O K L A H O M A Our Mission: To improve the lives of low-income individuals and families through service and collaboration leading to self-sufficiency. Item A Page 1 of 3 Little Dixie Community Action Agency, Inc. Board of Directors and/or Executive Committee Meeting 10:00 a.m. Tuesday, April 9, 2019 HomeOwnership Center - 500 East Rosewood - Hugo, Oklahoma AGENDA A. Call to Order and Invocation B. Opening of Board Meeting – Roll Call, Introduction of Guests C. Finance/Audit/Loan Committee Report Consent Docket - The following items of business indicated by brackets (D and E, F, G) may be voted upon by a single vote of the Board without discussion, unless and except for any item which any one of the Board desires to have discussion about at the meeting or withdrawn from the Consent Docket and handled individually in order immediately following the completion of the Consent Docket. D. Consideration, Discussion, and Vote to Approve March 2019 Regular Meeting Minutes (Organizational Standards – Category 5, Standard 5.5) E. Consideration, Discussion, and Vote to Approve February 2019 Financial Reports; Distribution of March 2019 Financials for May 2019 Consideration and Vote (Organizational Standards – Category 8, Standard 8.7) F.
    [Show full text]