Resource Guide to Community-Based Health and Community Development Initiatives

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Resource Guide to Community-Based Health and Community Development Initiatives DOCUMENT RESUME ED 468 060 UD 035 221 AUTHOR Leigh, Wilhelmina A.; Jimenez, Maren A.; Lee, Deitra H.; Andrews, Julia L. TITLE Resource Guide to Community-Based Health and Community Development Initiatives. INSTITUTION Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, Washington, DC. SPONS AGENCY Annie E. Casey Foundation, Baltimore, MD. PUB DATE 2002-05-00 NOTE 314p. AVAILABLE FROM Annie E. Casey Foundation, 701 St. Paul Street, Baltimore, MD 21202. Tel: 410-547-6600; Fax: 410-547-6624; Web site: http://www.aecf.org. PUB TYPE Guides Non-Classroom (055) Reference Materials Directories /Catalogs (132) -- Reports Descriptive (141) EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF01/PC13 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Community Programs; Economic Development; *Health Programs; Program Descriptions; Program Effectiveness; *Resources; *Urban Improvement ABSTRACT This guide features programs and initiatives that foster community development, while improving the health of individuals,or provide services to improve the health of individuals as well as fosteringcommunity economic development. The guide was developed to provide examples of successful programs and workable strategies to assist the revitalization activities underway in the Making Connections communities of the AnnieE. Casey Foundation. The guide provides details about 44programs illustrative of the varying pathways between health and community economic development.In particular, the guide focuses on 14 programs that have improving healthas the primary focus,2 with a primary focus on enhancing the economic status of individuals and/or their communities, and 28 in which the focusis dual, improving health and enhancing economic status. All of the highlighted programs are illustrative of means to achieve the objectives noted, and all reflect some hallmarks of effective community programs. (SLD) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. O C O 00 . IOINT CENTER FORPOLITICAL AND ECONOMIC' STUDIES RESOURCE GUIDE TO COMMUNITY-BASED HEALTH AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES May 2002 '9 4 Y. a a U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Off ice of Educational Research and Improvement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) PREPARED BY THE JOINT NgKihis document has been reproduced as . C received from the person or organization originating it. CENTER FOR POLITICALAND Minor changes have been made to o improve reproduction quality. ECONOMIC STUDIES FOR THE Points of view or opinions stated in this document do not necessarily represent ANNIE E. CASEY FOUNDATION official OERI position or policy. By Wilhehnina A. Leigh, Maren A. Jimenez 1-4 PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND Deitra H. Lee, and Julia L. Andrews DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS cNI BEEN GRANTED BY In O e) AvinicT.C9ioundafion BEST COPY AVAILA TO THE EDUCATIO AL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) 1 0 0 0 ABOUT THE FOUNDATION The Annie E. Casey Foundation is a private charitable organization dedicated to helping build better futures for disadvan- taged children in the United States. It was established in 1948`by Jim Casey, one of the founders of United Parcel Service, and his siblings, who named the Foundation in honor of their mother. The primary mission of the Foundation is,to foster public policies, human - service reforms, and community supporV that more effectively meet the needs of today's vulneiable children and families. In pursuit of this goal, the Foundation makes grants that help states; cities, and neighborhoods fashion more innovative, cost-effective responses to these needs. For more information, visit the Foundation's website, www.aecf:org. 02002, The Annie E. Casey Foundation, Baltimore, Maryland Additional free copies of this report may be ordered from the Annie E. Casey Foundation by calling 410-223-2890 or by visiting the Foundation website, www.aecf.org. 31enimAd03 1S361 Resource Guide to Community-Based Health and Community Development Initiatives Wilhelmina A. Leigh Maren A. Jimenez Deitra H. Lee Julia L. Andrews Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies May 2002 Report prepared by the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies for the Annie E. Casey Foundation Table of Contents Introduction 1 Summary Table 11 Program Pages Abbottsford and Schuylkill Falls Community Health Centers 35 Agenda for Children Tomorrow (ACT) 37 Anchor Health Properties/Doylestown Hospital Health and Wellness Center 39 Anchor Health Properties/Mercy Wellness Center 40 .. Anchor Health Properties/Wellness Place® in Trexlertown Mall 41 BROWNFIELDS NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP AND SHOWCASE COMMUNITIES 42 Brownfields Showcase Community: Baltimore 43 Brownfields Showcase Community: Chicago 45 Brownfields Showcase Community: Dallas 47 Brownfields Showcase Community: Eastward Ho! 49 Brownfields Showcase Community: Kansas City 51 Brownfields Showcase Community: Lowell 53 Brownfields Showcase Community: Portland 55 Brownfields Showcase Community: St. Paul 56 Brownfields Showcase Community: Salt Lake City 58 Brownfields Showcase Community: Seattle/King County 59 Brownfields Showcase Community: Stamford 61 Brownfields Showcase Community: Trenton 63 Camden Community Health Worker Initiative/Rowan University 65 Center for Health Professions 67 Cleveland Works, Inc. 69 Community Choices 2010 (CC 2010) 71 Comprehensive Community Revitalization Program (CCRP) 73 East End Partnership With Families (EEPWF) 75 Gilmor Homes (Jobs-Plus in Baltimore) 81 Greenwood Community Health Resource Center, Inc. 83 Helen B. Atkinson Center 85 Hillside Terrace 87 Ho'ola Like Outreach Project (Healers Together) 89 Jackson Medical Mall 90 Maternal and Infant Health Outreach Worker Project (MIHOW) 92 Mobile Nursing Clinic (The Nightingale) 94 Model Cities Health Corporation/Swope Parkway Health Center 95 Neighbor-to-Neighbor Program 97 New Beginnings Program 99 Northwest Alabama Community Health and Dental Clinic/Northwest Alabama Community Health Association 101 Pfizer, Inc. 103 Project Vida (Community Health & Services Program) 105 Rota Care Free Clinics 107 Rural Health Outreach Program 109 South Madison Health and Family Center 111 Walk-In Health Screening Clinic/University of Toledo 113 Wellness Clinics for the Elderly 114 Westside Health Authority (WHA) 115 Worcester Medical Center 117 Resource References AmeriCorps 119 Anchor Health Properties, LLC 121 Brownfields Economic Redevelopment Initiative 123 City Governments 126 . Colleges and Universities (Private Not For Profit) 129 Colleges and Universities (Public) 131 Community-Based and Community Development Organizations 134 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program 136 Community Facilities Loan and Grant Programs 138 Community Foundations 140 Community Health Center (CHC) Program 143 Community Outreach Partnership Centers (COPC) Program 145 Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) 147 Corporations 150 County Governments 152 Economic Development Districts 154 Empowerment Zone (EZ)/Enterprise Community (EC) Initiative 156 Federal Home Loan Bank Fund 164 Financial Institutions/Related Programs 166 Food Stamp Program 169 Georgia Indigent Care Trust Fund 171 Head Start Program 173 Health Care for the Homeless (HCH) Program 175 Healthy Start Initiative 177 HOPE VI Program 179 Job Opportunities and Basic Skills (JOBS) Training Program 181 Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) 182 Jobs-Plus 184 Maternal and Child Health Bureau 185 Medicaid 187 Medical Institutions/Health Plans (Private For Profit) 188 Medical Institutions/Health Plans (Private Not For Profit) 190 Metropolitan Council 192 Metropolitan Planning Council 193 Model Cities 194 ...National Park Service 195 ...National Register of Historic Places 197 ...NCB Development Corporation (NCBDC) 199 ...Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation (NRC) 201 ...Northeast Hazardous Substance Research Center 203 ...Philanthropic Institutions 205 ...Primary Care Associations 217 ...Primary Care Development Corporation 219 ...Public Housing Primary Care (PHPC) Program 221 ...Religious Institutions 223 ...Rotary Clubs 224 ...Ryan White Title II Program 226 ...State Governments 228 ...Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment (SAPT) Block Grant 232 ...Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Program 234 ...Title XVI Health Center Facility Loan Guarantee Program 236 ...U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 239 ...U.S. Economic Development Administration (EDA) 241 ...U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) 243 ...Urban Community Service Program 245 ...Urban League 246 ...Vision for Health Consortium 247 ...Workforce Investment Act (WIA) 249 Alphabetical Index of Resource References 251 Sector Index of Resource References 269 Bibliography 277 Introduction In many communities with persistently high unemployment rates and limited economic infrastructures, strategies to stimulate economic development long have been pursued to change the status quo. From Model Cities in the 1960s through Community Development Block Grants (CDBGs) first implemented in the 1970s to Empowerment Zones/Enterprise Communities and the Brownfields Economic Redevelopment Initiative in the 1990s, federal programs have sought to jumpstart local economies in a variety of ways. Private sector initiatives also have served as engines for community economic development, sometimes in conjunction with federal government efforts, as in the Jobs-Plus program, a public-private partnership. Since the late 1980s, selected foundations also have supported various community building initiatives. For example, the Rockefeller Foundation launched its persistent poverty initiative in 1987, followed in 1990 by the Ford
Recommended publications
  • ETA Handbook No. 408 Third Edition, November 2002
    U.S. Employment Service/ALMIS U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration ETA Handbook No. 408 Third Edition, November 2002 for the: Work Opportunity Tax Credit Program & the Welfare-to-Work Tax Credit USES/ALMIS Office of Workforce Investment Rm. C-4514 - FPB Washington, D.C. WOTC - P.L. 107-147 ETA HANDBOOK 408 C O N T E N T S F O R E W O R D...........................................vi I. THE WORK OPPORTUNITY TAX CREDIT PROGRAM.............I-1 BACKGROUND..........................................I-1 A. General........................................I-1 B. Legislative Authority WOTC/WtWTC...............I-2 C. Legislative Intent.............................I-3 D. WOTC/WtWTC and Employment and Training Objectives.....................................I-4 E. Effective Date.................................I-4 II. WORK OPPORTUNITY TAX CREDIT PROVISIONS.............II-1 A. Target Groups At-A-Glance.....................II-1 Qualified IV-A Recipient......................II-2 Qualified Veteran.............................II-3 Qualified Ex-Felon............................II-5 High-Risk Youth...............................II-7 Vocational Rehabilitation Referral............II-8 Qualified Summer Youth Employee..............II-10 Qualified Food Stamp Recipient...............II-12 Qualified Supplemental Security Income (SSI) Recipient...............................II-14 New York Liberty Zone Business Employee (NYLZBE)................................II-15 B. Essential Terms..............................II-16 Agency Declaration of
    [Show full text]
  • Wic, Medicaid, and Snap: Teaming up to Improve the Health of Women and Children
    WIC, MEDICAID, AND SNAP: TEAMING UP TO IMPROVE THE HEALTH OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN THE IMPORTANCE OF THE IMPORTANCE NWA’S MISSION MEDICAID FOR WIC OF SNAP FOR WIC PARTICIPANTS PARTICIPANTS The National The vast majority of WIC participants WIC benefits are not meant to cover WIC Association rely on Medicaid and/or the Children’s a full grocery basket of food each (NWA) provides its Health Insurance Program (CHIP)— month. Instead, targeted foods members with tools which provides coverage to uninsured address nutritional gaps in the diets of and leadership to children who are not eligible for pregnant women, new mothers, and expand and sustain Medicaid, but cannot afford private young children, For families lacking effective nutrition insurance—for healthcare coverage.3 resources to afford foods beyond the services for In addition to covering nearly half scope of WIC, SNAP plays a vital role. mothers and young of all births in the US, Medicaid A large body of research demonstrates children. provides a range of prenatal and that SNAP reduces the number of postpartum services that are key households facing food insecurity.7 8 to improving outcomes for WIC This is particularly true of households mothers and babies during these with children, with conservative vital periods.4 Most states’ Medicaid estimates attributing a reduction in OVERVIEW OF WIC programs cover access to prenatal childhood food insecurity of at least The Special Supplemental Nutrition vitamins, ultrasounds, amniocentesis, 8.1% to SNAP.9 Other studies assert Program for Women, Infants, and chorionic villus sampling (CVS) tests, that a mere six months of participation Children (WIC), the nation’s premier genetic counseling, breast pumps, in SNAP reduces the likelihood of public health nutrition program, has and postpartum home visiting.5 This food insecurity by one-third compared improved the health of women, infants, coverage plays a critical role in to similarly situated households.10 and children for 46 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Knoxville/Knox County, Tennessee Empowerment Zone Empowerment
    Knoxville/Knox County, Tennessee Empowerment Zone Empowerment Zones / Enterprise Communities Annual Report July 1, 2009 – July 2, 2010 Submitted September 20, 2010 Community Development Department Madeline Rogero, Director Prepared by Gwen Winfrey, Project Specialist Table of Contents Page Part I NARRATIVE REPORTS Executive Summary 4 Community Based Partnerships G2 C1 P1 Governance Board of EZ 4 G2 C2 P1 Transforming Neighborhoods Together – Round III 6 G2 C2 P2 EZ Administration 6 G2 C2 P3 Zone Advisory Councils 7 G2 C2 P4 EZ Administration Program Income 8 Economic Opportunity G3 C1 P1 Career Center 8 G3 C1 P2 CAC Beardsley Urban Farm S.E.E.D. 9 G3 C1 P3 Knox Area Urban League Workforce Technology Training 9 G3 C1 P4 CAC Workforce Connections 9 G3 C2 P1 Brownfields Redevelopment Revolving Fund 10 G3 C2 P2 Knoxville Convention Center Construction Project 11 G3 C2 P4 Digital Crossing 11 G3 C2 P5 Internet 11 G3 C2 P6 Stephens Square – Property Acquisition and Development 11 G3 C2 P7 Cultural Heritage Tourism 12 G3 C2 P8 Inner City Ventures Program 12 G3 C2 P9 CCBN (Mechanicsville) Supermarket 12 G3 C2 P10 Five Points Retail and Grocery 13 G3 C2 P11 Commercial Façade Program 13 G3 C2 P12 Lonsdale Commercial Development 14 G3 C2 P13 Vestal Commercial Redevelopment 15 G3 C2 P14 Business Expansion Loan Program (BELP) 15 C3 C2 P15 BELP Program Income 16 G3 C3 P1 Empowerment Bank Investment Shop 16 G3 C3 P2 Stephens Square – Expansion of Existing Businesses 17 G3 C3 P3 Empowerment Bank Investment Shop Program Income 17 G3 C3 P4 Small Business
    [Show full text]
  • FCC Should Evaluate the Efficiency and Effectiveness of the Lifeline Program
    United States Government Accountability Office T estimony Before the Subcommittee on Communications, Technology, Innovation and the Internet, Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, U.S. S enate For Release on Delivery Expected at 9:30 a.m. ET Tuesday, June 2, 2015 TELECOMMUNICATIONS FCC Should Evaluate the Efficiency and Effectiveness of the Lifeline Program Statement of Michael Clements, Acting Director Physical Infrastructure Issues ACCESSIBLE VERSION GAO-15-638T Letter Letter Chairman Wicker, Ranking Member Schatz, and Members of the Subcommittee: I am pleased to be here today as you discuss the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) efforts to promote telephone subscribership among low-income households. Through the Lifeline program, companies provide discounts to eligible low-income households for telephone service. The Lifeline program supports these companies through the Universal Service Fund, which is funded through mandatory fees that are usually passed along to consumers through a charge applied to their monthly telephone bills. The Lifeline program was created in the mid-1980s and has traditionally centered on wireline residential telephone service. However, FCC actions in 2005 and 2008 paved the way for prepaid wireless companies to begin offering Lifeline service in 2008; at the time, FCC did not quantify or estimate the potential increases in participation from its decision. Subsequently, Lifeline experienced rapid growth in participation and disbursements. In particular, from mid-2008 to mid-2012, Lifeline
    [Show full text]
  • Section 1: Evaluating Borrower Income Chapter 4
    HB-1-3550 CHAPTER 4: BORROWER ELIGIBILITY 4.1 OVERVIEW Ensuring that all applicants served are eligible and receive the correct amount of assistance is a significant responsibility of Loan Originators and Loan Approval Officials. A borrower must be income-eligible, demonstrate a credit history that indicates ability and willingness to repay a loan, and meet a variety of other program requirements. This chapter provides guidance for each of these areas. • Section 1: Evaluating Borrower Income provides instructions for calculating and verifying annual, adjusted, and repayment income. • Section 2: Evaluating Borrower Assets discusses Agency requirements for cash contributions to the purchase and methods for computing income from assets. • Section 3: Credit History identifies indicators of acceptable and unacceptable credit and provides instructions for reviewing an applicant’s credit history. • Section 4: Other Eligibility Requirements addresses a variety of other requirements applicants must meet to be eligible for the program. • Section 5: Processing the Certificate of Eligibility provides policies and procedures for processing Form FD 1944-59, Certificate of Eligibility. SECTION 1: EVALUATING BORROWER INCOME 4.2 OVERVIEW [7 CFR 3550.53(a) and (g), 7 CFR 3550.54] Loan Originators use income information to: (1) help determine whether an applicant is eligible for a loan; (2) calculate the applicant’s ability to repay a loan; and (3) determine the amount of the loan and the amount of payment subsidy the household can obtain. When reviewing an applicant’s repayment income, the Loan Originator must determine whether the income is stable and dependable. This will typically be accomplished by reviewing information provided in the application, paystubs, tax returns, and oral verifications.
    [Show full text]
  • SPS 2018-19 Free Reduced Lunch Application Complete.Pdf
    FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT FREE AND REDUCED-PRICE SCHOOL MEALS Dear Parent/Guardian: Children need healthy meals to learn. Skiatook Public Schools offers healthy meals every school day. Breakfast costs $1.35 (elementary) & $1.60 (secondary); lunch costs $2.50 (elementary) & $2.75 (secondary). Your children may qualify for free meals or for reduced-price meals. Reduced-price is $0.30 for breakfast and $0.40 for lunch. This packet includes an application for free or reduced-price meal benefits and a set of detailed instructions. Below are some common questions and answers to help you with the application process. 1. WHO CAN GET FREE OR REDUCED-PRICE MEALS? All children in households receiving benefits from Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), Food Distribution Program on Indian Reservations (FDPIR), or Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) are eligible for free meals. Foster children who are under the legal responsibility of a foster care agency or court are eligible for free meals. Children participating in their school’s Head Start program are eligible for free meals. Children who meet the definition of homeless, runaway, or migrant are eligible for free meals. Children may receive free or reduced-price meals if your household’s income is within the limits on the Federal Income Eligibility Guidelines. Your children may qualify for free or reduced-price meals if your household income falls at or below the limits on this chart. FEDERAL ELIGIBILITY INCOME CHART for School Year: 2019 Every Two Household Size Yearly Monthly Twice Per Month Weekly Weeks 1 22,459 1,872 936 864 432 2 30,451 2,538 1,269 1,172 586 3 38,443 3,204 1,602 1,479 740 4 46,435 3,870 1,935 1,786 893 5 54,427 4,536 2,268 2,094 1,047 6 62.419 5,202 2,601 2,401 1,201 7 70,411 5,868 2,934 2,709 1,355 8 78,403 6,534 3,267 3,016 1,508 Each additional 7,992 666 333 308 154 person: 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Hope Vi and Mixed-Finance Redevelopments: a Catalyst for Neighborhood Renewal
    ______________________________________________________________________________ HOPE VI AND MIXED-FINANCE REDEVELOPMENTS: A CATALYST FOR NEIGHBORHOOD RENEWAL Mindy Turbov Turbov Associates Valerie Piper Piper Advisory Services A Discussion Paper Prepared for the The Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program September 2005 ______________________________________________________________________________ THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION METROPOLITAN POLICY PROGRAM SUMMARY OF RECENT PUBLICATIONS * 2005 DISCUSSION PAPERS/RESEARCH BRIEFS The Electoral College Moves to the Sun Belt Credit Where It Counts: Maintaining a Strong Community Reinvestment Act Using Information Resources to Enhance Urban Markets Market-Based Community Economic Development Using the U.S. and U.K. Censuses for Comparative Research Public Housing Reform and Voucher Success: Progress and Challenges Space Available: The Realities of Convention Centers as Economic Development Strategy TREND SURVEYS Leaving Money (and Food) on the Table Step in the Right Direction: Recent Declines in Refund Loan Usage Among Low-Income Taxpayers ¿Tienes EITC? A Study of the Earned Income Tax Credit in Immigrant Communities The Price is Wrong: Getting the Market Right for Working Families in Philadelphia Job Sprawl and the Spatial Mismatch between Blacks and Jobs TRANSPORTATION REFORM SERIES On the Ground: Protecting America's Roads and Transit Against Terrorism Today’s Roads with Tomorrow’s Dollars: Using GARVEE Bonds to Finance Transportation Projects BROOKINGS/LSE COMPARATIVE URBAN ANALYSIS SERIES Americans and Britons: Key Population Data from the Last Three U.S. and U.K. Censuses * Copies of these and previous Brookings metro program publications are available on the web site, www.brookings.edu/METRO, or by calling the program at (202) 797-6414. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program would like to thank the John D.
    [Show full text]
  • Affordable-Housing-Acronyms
    ACRONYMS: Affordable Housing Development ACA Affordable Care Act United States federal statute representing a significant regulatory overhaul of the country’s healthcare system ACC Annual Contribution Contract Annual contracts with Public Housing Authorities for payments toward rent, financing debt service, and financing for modernization ADA Americans with Disabilities Act Federal civil rights law prohibiting discrimination based on disability ADU Accessory Dwelling Unit Mother-in-law apartment ADWAS Abused & Deaf Women’s’ Advocacy Services Service provider for deaf women fleeing abusive homes in King County but serving a state wide client group AFR Applicable Federal Rate Rate set by U.S. Treasury for imputing interest AHAB Affordable Housing Advisory Board Board appointed by governor to advise on state housing policy AHMA Affordable Housing Management Association Trade group of property managers AHP Affordable Housing Program Financing program of FHLB AHW AIDS Housing of Washington Non-profit housing and services providers (Seattle); changed name to Building Changes AI Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Document HUD requires of block grant recipients that Choice identifies fair housing barriers in the community AMI Area Median Income HUD’s income tables adjusted for family size ARCH A Regional Coalition for Housing Funding coalition of East King County Cities ARRA American Recovery and Reinvestment Act An economic stimulus package enacted in February 2009. AWHA Association of Washington Housing Authorities Trade association of
    [Show full text]
  • Social Security Programs in the United States
    FOOD AND NUTRITION ASSISTANCE are provided to States to encourage maintaining program spend- ing levels. Families cannot spend more than five cumulative years on TANF. States can specify fewer years, and exempt up to 20% of the caseload from the time limit. After the time limit is exceeded, they can elect to provide noncash assistance and vouchers to families using Social Services Block Grant or State funds. Child care funding is provided to help more mothers move into jobs. Women on welfare continue to receive health coverage for their families, including a year or more of transitional Medicaid when they leave welfare for work. To be eligible for TANF block grants, States must operate a child support enforcement program meeting Federal requirements. The Federal Case Registry and National Directory of New Hires will be used to track delinquent parents across State lines. Child support can be withheld directly from wages, and paternity estab- lishment is streamlined; cash assistance will be reduced by at least 25% in cases of failure to cooperate with paternity establish- ment. The law establishes uniform interstate child support laws, central registries of child support orders and collections, and toughened enforcement of child support. Unmarried minor parents are required to live with a respon- sible adult or in an adult-supervised setting and participate in educational and training activities in order to receive assistance. Efforts are to be under taken to prevent nonmarital teen pregnancy. Food and The U.S. Department of Agriculture provides children and Nutrition needy families access to a more healthful diet through its food assistance programs and comprehensive nutrition education Assistance efforts, and provides farmers an outlet for the distribution of food purchased under farmer assistance authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Child Nutrition Reauthorization
    Updated February 26, 2021 Child Nutrition Reauthorization (CNR): An Overview Introduction example, the law created the Community Eligibility Child nutrition reauthorization (CNR) refers to Congress’s Provision, an option within NSLP/SBP that allows eligible process of making changes to the permanent statutes that schools to provide free meals to all students. The law also authorize the child nutrition programs, the Special required USDA to update the nutrition standards for school Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and meals and establish nutrition standards for other foods sold Children (WIC), and related activities: in schools during the school day. For WIC, the law included the requirement that states transition, by October 1, 2020, the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act, from their primarily paper voucher-based WIC benefits to the Child Nutrition Act of 1966, and Electronic Benefits Transfer (EBT). In some cases, the new (less often) Section 32 of the Act of August 24, 1935, policies were described within the statute; in other cases, which transfers funds to the child nutrition programs the details were laid out in USDA-promulgated regulations. annually. Recent Reauthorization Efforts The most recent CNR was the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids th Act of 2010 (P.L. 111-296). Some of the authorities created During the 114 Congress, the committees then exercising or extended in that law expired on September 30, 2015. jurisdiction (the House Education and Workforce Committee and Senate Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry However, the vast majority of program operations have continued with funding provided by appropriations acts. Committee) marked up CNR bills but reauthorization was not completed (see CRS Report R44373, Tracking Child Programs Typically Included in CNR Nutrition Reauthorization in the 114th Congress: An Overview).
    [Show full text]
  • Using Behavioral Science to Improve the WIC Experience Lessons for the Field from San Jose, California
    Using Behavioral Science to Improve the WIC Experience Lessons for the field from San Jose, California Authors: Dani Grodsky, Antonia Violante, Anthony Barrows; ideas42 Wendi Gosliner; Nutrition Policy Institute May 2017 ideas42 USING BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE TO IMPROVE THE WIC EXPERIENCE: Lessons for the field from San Jose, California | 1 Contents Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................................2 About ideas42 .................................................................................................................................2 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................3 Introduction .....................................................................................................................................6 Section A: Program Logistics: Enrolling and Persisting in WIC ..............................................8 Section B: Building Nutrition Knowledge and Intentions ......................................................19 Section C: Follow Through of Health-Promoting Behaviors ............................................... 27 Section D: Exiting the WIC Program ........................................................................................ 43 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................... 53 Appendices ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wic Certification Overview Module
    WIC CERTIFICATION OVERVIEW MODULE Updated: 10/2020 WIC Certification Overview Module WIC Appointments SECTION 1 Objectives After this section, you will be able to • Understand the layout and purpose of the Minnesota Operations Manual. • List the 4 main types of WIC appointments/visits that WIC staff perform in clinic • Describe what happens during each appointment type • State the certification period for each participant category • Observe the 4 main types of appointments Overview There are four basic appointment/visit types staff perform in the WIC clinic. Understanding these will help you better understand day-to-day WIC operations. It will also help you understand the frequency in which a WIC participant is expected to come to WIC and the purpose for each of these visits. The activities that occur within these appointments are outlined by USDA regulations. Minnesota Operations Manual (MOM) Federal regulations outline “rules” for the WIC program. The policies and procedures Minnesota WIC has developed to meet these regulations are found in the Minnesota Operations Manual (MOM). MOM is on the MDH WIC website under the section Local Agency /Finance and Program Management/ MN Operations Manual (MOM). MOM is arranged into chapters, and under each chapter are various sections. When a policy is referred to, it’s usually listed as numbers, i.e., MOM 5.2.1 refers to Chapter 5, Section 2, and Part 1 of MOM. Charts, forms, or other references related to a Section of MOM are found in the Exhibit section under each Chapter to which it pertains. MOM is referenced throughout these training modules.
    [Show full text]