DOCSLIB.ORG

How Can Olmert Afford His Partners? Demands from Possible Coalition Allies Could Break the Budget

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
How Can Olmert Afford His Partners? Demands from Possible Coalition Allies Could Break the Budget 4/6/06 How Can Olmert Afford His Partners? Demands from possible coalition allies could break the budget . Stewart Ain and Joshua Mitnick As Ehud Olmert began forming a new government in Israel this week, he faced a formidable task of welding together a stable coalition from 12 parties — none of which is dominant — and in which his natural allies are expected to make serious money demands. “We don’t have any figures yet, but people are saying the demands of the Pensioners Party, Labor and Shas will total 10 to 12 billion shekels [$2.2 billion to $2.6 billion],” said Gabi Sheffer, a political science professor at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem. Some of that money will come from the current 7 billion shekel surplus, according to Yoram Meital, chairman of the Department of Middle East Studies at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. “I’m not sure [Olmert] can respond to all of the requests of the parties that we have seen made in the last couple of days in the Israeli media, but this is the time of negotiation and at this stage everybody can come in with their maximum requests. An associate of Olmert, whose Kadima Party won 29 seats, was quoted this week as saying that there “can be no progress” with potential coalition parties unless they “make serious concessions.” Kadima’s outlook on the economy is closer to that of former Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who was seen as having restored economic health at the expense of the nation’s poor. The Pensioners Party, formed just weeks before the election and one of its big winners, campaigned on a single issue — helping to improve the condition of the country’s 750,000 pensioners, including a guaranteed pension for all (which would cost the state as much as 4 billion shekels a year) and subsidized medical costs for the elderly. It also wants a significant increase in old-age pensions, a move that could cost 2.1 billion shekels yearly. A senior member of the Labor Party was quoted Wednesday by the Israeli newspaper Yediot Achronot as saying that although he does not expect any serious difficulties when it comes to diplomatic issues, a struggle over socioeconomic affairs looms. “We still haven’t started dealing with everything, and therefore it could take quite a bit of time and even not work out,” he said. “We want to be in the government, but that doesn’t mean we’ll renounce our principles.” The Labor Party, under former Histadrut union head Amir Peretz, won 19 seats and campaigned on a platform that placed socioeconomic issues ahead of all others. He called for an increase in the minimum wage to $1,000 a month over three years at a cost to the state of 2 billion shekels a year, increases in welfare payments, and the inclusion of more medicines in the state’s health plan. The other possible coalition partners also have their money demands. Shas, the Orthodox Sephardic party that won 12 seats, also campaigned on socioeconomic issues, attacking the neo-conservative economic policies implemented by Netanyahu that hurt many low-income families. It also wants increased aid for fervently Orthodox educational schools. In addition, it wants a return of the child allowances to their pre-2003 level, a move that would cost 3 billion shekels annually. And it wants the restoration of extra grants for young couples who are entitled to government mortgages, a step estimated to cost 1 billion shekels per year. Meretz-Yachad, the party of the far left that won five seats, also pressed for a broad social- economic-democratic agenda. It called for developing a social policy under which the weak and under-privileged would live in dignity as the social gap disappeared. United Torah Judaism, which won six seats, wants more money for the fervently Orthodox educational institutions at an estimated cost of as much as 500 million shekels a year, and increased state benefits for its members. All of this wrangling is seen as likely to delay implementation of the 2006 budget, whose passage is one of the first orders of business for the new 17th Knesset. How could the new government afford these possible increases? David Makovsky, a senior fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, questioned whether it would mean a cut in defense spending, a tax hike, a cut in other programs or a request for more aid from abroad. “There is no doubt that part of the game in this election was a backlash to the austerity cuts Israel was forced to impose because of the intifada,” he said. “The country’s GNP was dropped by 9 percent per year. The fact that Israel grew at 5 percent last year is a sign of its resilient economy and that the austerity cuts were necessary.” But even before coalition negotiations began, members of Olmert’s Kadima Party were expressing concerns that an increased demand for social spending would break the budget and make the financial markets uneasy. Against this backdrop are Olmert’s plans to move more than 60,000 settlers from the West Bank to behind the security barrier Israel is completing. Although the move is not likely to begin for at least another year, Leonard Weinberg, a professor of political science at the University of Nevada, said the cost of such action would be staggering compared to the cost of moving 8,000 Jews from the Gaza Strip last summer. “Seeking subsidies from the U.S. would not be an unreasonable financial request,” he said. Peace Process Front In the meantime on the political front, the Labor Party plans to push Olmert into pursuing a “serious” search for a Palestinian partner for peace negotiations. Party leaders say it wants to ensure “there isn’t an automatic pullout.” “We want to see if there are people who can negotiate” on the Palestinian side, said Labor Knesset Member and former New York Consul General Colette Avital. “We want to see if there are moderate forces in Fatah.” “They have to get their act together in Kadima and decide what their policy is,” she continued. “Is it [behind Foreign Minister] Tzipi Livni who says [Palestinian President Mahmoud] Abbas isn’t relevant, or is it [behind] Ehud Olmert, who thinks that Abbas is relevant.” While many in Kadima question whether Abbas can deliver a tangible peace agreement, Labor politicians say they want an exhaustive search for Palestinian moderates who might be willing to embark on talks. “This could be a contentious issue between Labor and Kadima,” said Yossi Alpher, the editor of an Israeli-Palestinian Web-based journal, bitterlemons.org. “This is an issue on which they don’t agree. They agree pro forma, but they don’t agree with the substance.” Avital said that a serious search for a partner isn’t done with a “stopwatch in hand.” Nevertheless, Olmert’s promise to fix Israel’s final borders within four years has spawned speculation that his government can’t wait for more than a year if it wants to move forward with a new unilateral move. The acting prime minister said in a victory speech last week that Israel prefers a peace treaty with the Palestinians and that he was ready to make concessions. Even Hamas’ Prime Minister, Ismail Haniyeh, gave his blessing to Abbas renewing negotiations. But few observers believe the time is ripe for another round of negotiations. “The Palestinians will be very busy in the coming months trying to get their house in order,” said Bruce Maddy Weizman, a fellow at the Dayan Center for Middle East and North African Studies. “The real question is what is the relationship between Abbas and the Hamas government. So far the picture is muddy.” It’s still unclear how the sides can even get past the first stage of the U.S.-sponsored road map, which requires Israel to dismantle illegal settler outposts while the Palestinians disarm militants. With Hamas stating that it will not rein in gunmen who are part of the “resistance” against Israel, the prospects for any progress on the peace plan seem remote. Hamas’ ascendance to control the Palestinian parliament has taken it off the front lines of bombings against Israel. In a strange role reversal, Hamas is in the position of responsibility for maintaining order, and members of deposed Fatah are trying to embarrass the new government with attacks on two West Bank settlements Hamas may focus inward in the upcoming months to gather strength and establish its rule. “On the top of their agenda is to consolidate their power internally, and to break the siege imposed on them by the U.S. and Europe,” said Said Zeedani, a Ramallah political analyst. “They have never been in power, and there will be a lot of learning for them. There are huge challenges when it comes to the rule of law, poverty, and welfare; the internal agenda will be preeminent.” The same thing could be said of the Israeli side as well. After Amir Peretz based his campaign on socio-economic issues, he may end up as defense minister. That’s because financial markets would go south if the populist Labor leader got the finance portfolio, and because the top foreign ministry post was promised to Tzipi Livni. As defense minister, Peretz would have an opportunity to help direct Israeli-Palestinian violence toward calm or toward escalation. He’ll also have control over the government’s largest ministry. Knesset Member Avital predicted that Peretz would try to shift about $400 million from the defense budget to education in the next parliament.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Amir Peretz Begins As Defense Minister by J. Zel Lurie
    Amir Peretz Begins as Defense Minister by J. Zel Lurie While this three-day symposium [at AJ Committee — with Yehoshua] was going on in Washington, Ehud Olmert was introducing his new government in Jerusalem. Most newsworthy are the two of the five new Labor ministers, Amir Peretz, minister of defense and Yuli Tamir, minister of education. Peretz confronts a large group of army officers and bureaucrats who have been coddling and cooperating with the settlers for decades They are accustomed to running the West Bank arbitrarily and no one dared question their decisions. Here is one small example of what Peretz is up against: A couple of Saturdays ago, the Jewish settlers in Maon, south of Hebron, wearing masks, attacked Israeli soldiers who were escorting 18 Arab kids to the regional school in at-Tawani. On the following Saturday, Peace Now received the army’s permission to send two busloads of peaceniks to a demonstration in at-Tawani. At Gush Etzion junction the buses were stopped. “Since we gave permission, the area has been declared a closed military zone,” the Peace Now demonstrators were told. “You cannot proceed.” Ran Cohen, a Meretz M.K., was on one of the buses. He called Peretz who must have raised the roof with his army subordinates. After an hour the buses were allowed to continue on their journey and hold their demonstration. Brigadier General Ilan Paz, who recently retired after 28 years in the army, seven of which were in the West Bank. commented: “For 18 months the settlers in Maon have been harassing kids passing their farm on their way to school.
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Politics and Diplomacy
    Hoover Press : Zelnick/Israel hzeliu ch7 Mp_119 rev1 page 119 7. Politics and Diplomacy as israeli forces were clearing recalcitrant settlers from their Gaza homes on August 16, 2005, Khalil Shikaki, director of the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research (PSR) in Ra- mallah, published a column in the Jerusalem Post headlined, “How Sharon and Abbas Can Both Win.”1 Shikaki, a pollster and political analyst respected in Israel and the west, questioned the wisdom of Israeli unilateralism in Gaza and on the West Bank as opposed to Lebanon, where no one on the other side wanted to talk. Here, he argued, Hamas may be as close-minded as Hez- bollah, preferring to paint Israel’s withdrawal as a victory for Pal- estinian resistance, but Abu Mazen, supported by Palestinian pub- lic opinion, wanted to reduce tensions and negotiate. Make him look good by easing restrictions on Palestinian trade and move- ment, and he will help Sharon and Israel by defeating Hamas and talking about the terms for settling the conflict. In other words, let the PA rather than Hamas control the Palestinian narrative of withdrawal. Shakaki updated his survey data two months later for a con- ference at Brandeis University hosted by Shai Feldman, director of the Crown Center for Middle East Studies and former director of the Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies in Tel Aviv. By that October conference, 84 percent of Palestinians were convinced that violence had played a role in the Israeli withdrawal. Irre- 1. Khalil Shikaki, “How Sharon and Abbas Can Both Win,” Jerusalem Post, August 16, 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • AMIR PERETZ Member of Parliament, State of Israel
    SESSION 3 • Saturday, October 16, 2010 page 1 AMIR PERETZ Member of Parliament, State of Israel First of all I would like to thank the IFRI organization for the conference that is taking place here in Morocco. Here with me, are two other members of the Israeli parlimant - Meir Sheetrit, former minister of justice and Ahmad Tibi who represents the Arab – Israeli citizens. I was born in Morocco and feel that a big part of my values as a person were acquired here. Even though I left as a young boy, the strengths that I received here have been a part of me all through the way. I want to send a message of peace to his Majesty the king of Morocco and wish him all the very best. For a big part of Israeli citizens his majesty and the Kingdom of Morocco, remains a lasting symbol and example of possible coexistence, rooted deep in our hearts. Ladies and gentlemen, I could have talked about many issues which occupy many countries around the world - Financial crisis, human rights and poverty. I could have talked about security threats, Iran and it’s race for obtaining unconventional weapons, sources of terror and their effect on personal security in each and every country. But today I want to focus in the chance for an optimist future in all the Middle East states, especially a better future between Israel and the Palestinians. Members of the conference, Some of us are experienced in war, and we all know that war comes at a heavy price for all sides.
    [Show full text]
  • The Saban Forum 2005
    The Saban Forum 2005 A U.S.–Israel Dialogue Dealing with 21st Century Challenges Jerusalem, Israel November 11–13, 2005 The Saban Forum 2005 A U.S.–Israel Dialogue Dealing with 21st Century Challenges Jerusalem, Israel November 11–13, 2005 Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies Tel Aviv University Speakers and Chairmen Shai Agassi Shimon Peres Stephen Breyer Itamar Rabinovich David Brooks Aviezer Ravitzky William J. Clinton Condoleezza Rice Hillary Rodham Clinton Haim Saban Avi Dicter Ariel Sharon Thomas L. Friedman Zvi Shtauber David Ignatius Strobe Talbott Moshe Katsav Yossi Vardi Tzipi Livni Margaret Warner Shaul Mofaz James Wolfensohn Letter from the Chairman . 5 List of Participants . 6 Executive Summary . 9 Program Schedule . 19 Proceedings . 23 Katsav Keynote Address . 37 Clinton Keynote Address . 43 Sharon Keynote Address . 73 Rice Keynote Address . 83 Participant Biographies . 89 About the Saban Center . 105 About the Jaffee Center . 106 The ongoing tumult in the Middle East makes continued dialogue between the allied democracies of the United States and Israel all the more necessary and relevant. A Letter from the Chairman In November 2005, we held the second annual Saban Forum in Jerusalem. We had inaugurated the Saban Forum in Washington DC in December 2004 to provide a structured, institutional- ized annual dialogue between the United States and Israel. Each time we have gathered the high- est-level political and policy leaders, opinion formers and intellectuals to define and debate the issues that confront two of the world’s most vibrant democracies: the United States and Israel. The timing of the 2005 Forum could not have been more propitious or tragic.
    [Show full text]
  • Withdrawal from the Withdrawal Plan?
    One Hundred Days After the Elections: Withdrawal from the Withdrawal Plan? Lars Hänsel / Katharina von Münster Executive Summary Israel's one-sided withdrawal from Gaza in the summer of 2005 has brought the country a period of profound changes. The evacuation of Israeli settlements on the West Bank, the historic motherland of Eretz Israel, which was initiated by the Sharon administration, constituted for many a breach of a national and religious taboo for which, however, there were reasons. On the one hand, the failure of the Oslo process had destroyed the trust between Israelis and Palestinians; on the other, demographic forecasts had already prognosticated that the Jewish population would lose its numerical majority in the region between the Mediterranean and the Jordan. After Sharon's retirement from policy, the subject of withdrawal – Tochnit HaHitkansut – became the central campaign issue under his successor, Ehud Olmert. Mr Olmert's convergence plan not only envisaged a complete evacuation of the settlements scattered all over the West Bank, but also the integration of all settlements situated close to the border into blocks belonging to Israel. The withdrawal has also changed the country's party landscape for good. At the end of November 2005, Ariel Sharon announced his resignation from the Likud and the foundation of his own party called Kadima, resulting in the collapse of the Likud. When the 73-year-old retired from politics after an apoplexy in January, Mr Olmert, a former mayor of Jerusalem who was little known until that day, took over the business of government– an administrator who represented a political style which differed greatly from that of the general.
    [Show full text]
  • CRS Report for Congress Received Through the CRS Web
    Order Code RL33476 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Israel: Background and Relations with the United States Updated July 26, 2006 Carol Migdalovitz Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service { The Library of Congress Israel: Background and Relations with the United States Summary On May 14, 1948, the State of Israel declared its independence and was immediately engaged in a war with all of its neighbors. Armed conflict has marked every decade of Israel’s existence. Despite its unstable regional environment, Israel has developed a vibrant parliamentary democracy, albeit with relatively fragile governments. Most recently, the Kadima Party placed first in the March 28, 2006, Knesset (parliament) election, and Prime Minister Ehud Olmert formed a four-party coalition government. Israel has an advanced industrial, market economy in which the government plays a substantial role. The economy is now doing very well, and increased social spending is expected. Israel’s foreign policy is focused largely on its region, Europe, and the United States. The government views Iran as an existential threat due to its nuclear ambitions and support for anti-Israel terrorists. Israel concluded a peace treaty with Egypt in 1979 and with Jordan in 1994 but never reached accords with Syria and Lebanon. It negotiated a series of agreements with the Palestinians in the 1990s, but the Oslo peace process ended in 2000, with the intifadah or uprising against Israeli occupation. Israeli and Palestinian officials resumed contacts after the November 2004 death of Yasir Arafat. Both sides accepted but have not implemented the “Roadmap,” the international framework for achieving a two-state solution to their conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Mitchell: Rebuilding Labor
    Thomas Mitchell: Rebuilding Labor In a previous article, I wrote about lessons from the Northern Ireland peace process for the Middle East. I wrote that Israel’s parliamentary peace camp will need rebuilding in order to implement those lessons and make peace with the Palestinians. Since the formation of the second Rabin government in June 1992, Israel’s parliamentary peace camp—Labor and Meretz—has lost half of its representation. The rebuilding of Labor—or a new center-left party—is more critical than the fate of Meretz, because the latter is the junior partner. Meretz is the missionary party that has already succeeded in selling the concept of the two-state solution to Labor. But unless Labor rebuilds to the point that it can head a coalition government without Likud or other right-wing elements, there will not be peace in the Middle East. Labor is a middle-aged party suffering from several problems. First, it is overly dependent on former generals to fill the upper slots on its Knesset list. This has been the situation since Labor was formed in 1968 and the problem has only gotten worse over time. Second, it allowed itself to become too dependent on a few key leaders and did not replace them as they retired and left the party. Third, it has served in too many national-unity governments and so has not sufficiently differentiated itself from the center-right parties, Kadima and Likud. Fourth, it is suffering from the fallout of both a failed peace process and a failed war. A major characteristic of Labor is its dependence on former generals.
    [Show full text]
  • The People Have Spoken: Elections and the Future of Israeli-Palestinian Peacemaking Speech to Australian Institute of International Affairs, Queensland, 4 April 2006
    = éÉêëéÉÅíáîÉë qÜÉ=mÉçéäÉ=Ü~îÉ=péçâÉåW== bäÉÅíáçåë=~åÇ=íÜÉ=cìíìêÉ=çÑ=fëê~ÉäáJ m~äÉëíáåá~å=mÉ~ÅÉã~âáåÖ= ^åíÜçåó=_ìÄ~äç= ^éêáä=OMMS= = The Lowy Institute for International Policy is an independent international policy think tank based in Sydney, Australia. Its mandate ranges across all the dimensions of international policy debate in Australia – economic, political and strategic – and it is not limited to a particular geographic region. Its two core tasks are to: • produce distinctive research and fresh policy options for Australia’s international policy and to contribute to the wider international debate. • promote discussion of Australia’s role in the world by providing an accessible and high quality forum for discussion of Australian international relations through debates, seminars, lectures, dialogues and conferences. Lowy Institute Perspectives are occasional papers and speeches on international events and policy. The views expressed in this paper are the author’s own and not those of the Lowy Institute for International Policy. The people have spoken: elections and the future of Israeli-Palestinian peacemaking Speech to Australian Institute of International Affairs, Queensland, 4 April 2006 Anthony Bubalo Introduction Since Christmas, in the space of three short months, Palestinians and Israelis have gone to the polls. It is something of a unique situation – where an Israeli and a Palestinian election have been held so close together and at such a crossroads in terms of the future relations between the two peoples. In fact, I would go so far to say that the two elections, taken together, were a kind of a referendum on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict – albeit a referendum of a peculiar sort.
    [Show full text]
  • Partners for Progressive Israel Condemns Labor Party Joining Netanyahu Coalition
    Partners for Progressive Israel Condemns Labor Party Joining Netanyahu Coalition Partners for Progressive Israel Condemns Labor Party Joining Netanyahu Coalition Partners for Progressive Israel joins the Israeli Meretz Party and the World Union of Meretz in condemning the reported decision of the chairman of the Israeli Labor Party, MK Amir Peretz, to join the coalition-in-preparation to be led by Benjamin Netanyahu. The formation of this coalition betrays innumerable promises that Peretz made in the recent election campaign that he would never join a coalition with Netanyahu as Prime Minister. Peretz’s decision dissolves the electoral coalition between Meretz and Labor, whose primary object was to prevent Netanyahu from leading a new government. Meretz is thus the sole Zionist party which espouses no annexation, an end to the occupation, narrowing of the horrendous income inequality, and equal rights for all Israeli citizens. We call on all those who still uphold these bedrock values to support Meretz, Partners for Progressive Israel, and affiliated organizations in order to return Israel to the path of liberal democracy and civil liberties, and to oppose the new Netanyahu government in its attempts to stifle dissent and expand settlement in the occupied territories. We recognize that Israel, in common with the rest of the planet, faces the immediate coronavirus crisis, and we will support all necessary measures to limit its spread and protect the Israeli population, as well as Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza, whose success in combating Covid-19 is necessarily entwined with that of Israelis. Nevertheless, we will rigorously insist that all measures involve the minimum interference with civil liberties and that they not be perpetuated any longer than necessary to combat the virus.
    [Show full text]
  • Outgoing Delegations—20Th Knesset
    The Knesset Outgoing Delegations—20th Knesset Participation by the Director General of the Knesset in Events Marking 100 years of Democracy in Georgia Participants: Director General of the Knesset Albert Sakharovich Destination: Georgia Dates: 10–14 March 2019 Details: The Director General of the Knesset, Albert Sakharovich, was invited by his Georgian counterpart, Mr. Givi Mikandadze, to take part in a series of events marking the 100th anniversary of democracy in Georgia. During the visit, work meetings were held in Parliament, including a tour of the training center and a visit to an information and reception area for people with disabilities. In addition, a tour was held of the National Parliamentary Library of Georgia, which is housed in the parliament, and the Book Museum. Conference of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Mediterranean (PAM) in Belgrade Participants: MK Amir Peretz (Labor), MK Eitan Broshi (Labor) Destination: Belgrade, Serbia Dates: 20–24 February 2019 Details: MK Amir Peretz, the Knesset representative in the PAM, was elected by secret ballot as vice president of the organization with a large majority of 80% of the vote and was given the second slot after Italy. MK Peretz: "This is an important moment in strengthening the international standing of the Knesset in the international arena. It provides an opportunity to advance economic and political issues in a complex arena that includes representatives of the Mediterranean basin and representatives of Arab countries in our region." MK Peretz called on the organization to serve as an umbrella for bilateral talks, including between Israelis and Palestinians. Conference of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) Participants: MK Anat Berko (Likud) Destination: Vienna, Austria Dates: 20–23 February 2019 Details: The OSCE's Winter Meeting was held in February 2019 inVienna.
    [Show full text]
  • Histadrut Elects Amir Peretz Hersey's "Wall" Revis Ted Lza
    $3.00 Frontier MY ALIYA Was It Worth It? Bizarre Case o HISTADRUT Lord Gordon ELECTS AMIR PERETZ HERSEY'S "WALL" REVIS TED LIONHEARTS Heroes of Israe AWA Tisha B Av LZA CONVENTION Ashes and Hope HIGHLIGHTS S I N C E 1 9 3 4 • A LABOR ZIONIST JOURNAL National Committee for Labor Israel congratulates Amir Peretz on his election as chairman of Israel's General Federation of Labor H istad rut PMV 57 President Executive ~~~Director 275 Seventh Avenue • New York, New York 10001 Laborlsrael@jon .cjfny.org • www.laborlsrael .org JEWISH CONTENTSVol. LXV, No. 4 (633) JULY/AUGUST 1998 Frontier Israel 4 SINCE 1934 NETANYAHU'S DILEMMAS Susan Hattis Rolef 7 A LABOR ZIONIST JOURNAL PRESIDENT AND PREMIER Misha Louvish Histadrut 9 Founders ISRAEL'S WORKERS VOTE Jerry Goodman Hayim Greenberg Marie Syrkin Tribute 12 GOLDA AT 100 Editorial Board Essay 15 Henry Feingold, Chairman WAS IT WORTH IT? Yosef Criden Saul B. Cohen Hyman Faine American Scene 16 Jonathan J. Goldberg FROM OPEN ENROLLMENT Emanuel S . Goldsmith TO REMEDIATION Henry L. Feingold Jerry Goodman Rabbi Mark W. Kiel Review Essay 19 Chava Lapin HERSEY'S WALL REVISITED David Rosenthal Jeffry V. Mallow Daniel Mann History 21 Mordecai Newman LORD GEORGE GORDON Joseph Adler Samuel Norich Michael S . Perry Days of Sorrow 25 Mark Raider TISHA B'AV and YOM HASHOAH Amnon Hadary Eduardo Rauch Ezra Spicehandler Notebook 27 Phyllis Sutker BETWEEN ASHES AND HOPE Nahum Guttman David Twersky In the Movement 28 THE LZA CONVENTION - HIGHLIGHTS Nahum Guttman Reinventing Labor Zionism Bennett Lovett-Graff Editor The Seventh "C" Fradie Kramer Books 24 LIONHEARTS : Heroes of Israel NOTE TO SUBSCRIBERS ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Revival Volume3 Issue 1.Indd
    Published by the Israeli Labor Party © 2006, all rights reserved Subscriptions, enquiries, and feedback: [email protected] Editorial committee: Colette Avital MK, Guy Spigelman (Editor), Marcus Sheff February 2006 Volume 3 REVIVAL Issue 1 The English News Magazine of the Israeli Labor Party General Elections on March 28 Amir Peretz: Only Labor will bring Peace and Social Justice “Israel is at one of the most important moments in its history, a moment that will define its future. Unfortunately, over the years, many have known how to diagnose the strategic threats facing Israel, and suggest merely tactical measures, which do not offer an overall solution to the ills of Israeli society. I intend to act differently, and offer the Israeli public a complete moral road map that includes Party Chairman Amir Peretz with King Mohammed VI of Morocco at a recent a political chapter and a social-economic meeting in Fez. The two discussed chapter, which will guide the entirety of the regional developments and Morocco’s political and economic measures I propose. role in the peace process. The chapters are interconnected because there will be no peace without social justice and there will be no social justice without progress in the peace process.” Party Chairman Amir Peretz at the Herzliya Conference on the Balance of Israel’s National Security, 24th January 2006 Election Special Guy Spigelman on the upcoming campaign.................................... page 2 Speech by Party Leader Peretz to SI Council in Athens................. page 3 Ephraim Sneh on the challenge posed by Hamas ......................... page 4 Labor’s candidates for the 17th Knesset........................................
    [Show full text]