• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

Office 10, 14 Instytutska St., Kyiv, Ukraine, 01021 Tel.: +38 (044) 253-44-82 | Fax: +38 (044) 253-44-82 www.icps.com.ua | [email protected] INSIDE UKRAINE May, 24 2017/ #68 May, 2017 Сontent PUBLIC POLICIES The results of the Year of General Prosecutor Yuriy Lutsenko ....................... 1 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS Land reform in Ukraine: Problems and Prospects ........................................... 5 POLITICAL COMPETITION Elections to United Territorial Communities: Results, Trends and Prospects of the Parliamentary Political Parties ......... 11 Inside Ukraine 68 May, 2017 Public Policies On May 12, 2016 Yuriy Lutsenko was appointed The results of the Year of General the General Prosecutor. For the first time in the Prosecutor Yuriy Lutsenko modern history of Ukraine, a politician was ap- pointed to the position of the Prosecutor Gen- The analysis of the year of work of the Gen- eral, and what is important, without law educa- eral Prosecutor Yuriy Lutsenko showed that his tion and the necessary experience in the field activity is more focused on creating beautiful of law. images in the media, than on achieving real On the new post Yuriy Lutsenko in the first place, results. Most of the promises of Yuriy Lutsenko promised to reform and clear the Prosecu- were populistic, and some were only partially tor’s Office, to punish members of the previous implemented. Almost all high-profile crimi- government, responsible for the killings on the nal cases initiated by the General Prosecutor Maidan, to return stolen Yanukovych’s team are stopped at the investigation stage, either funds. Lutsenko also emphasized the political through procedural violations by the prosecu- impartiality of his work and promised that poli- tion and the weakness of the evidence base tics will in not affect the investigation of reso- collected by them falls apart in court. Yuriy nant cases. Lutsenko uses GPO as an instrument of politi- cal competition and pressure, and also as a PR Yuriy Lutsenko talked a lot about the intensifica- platform for a future political career. During the tion of the lustration processes within the Pros- year of his work as General Prosecutor Yuriy Lut- ecutor’s Office. The purification began with the senko was not able to reform a body towards verification of probity of prosecutors – collect - European standards, which for 20 years acted ed using a special questionnaire of information as a tool of promoting political interests. on occupations and lifestyle of the employees Inside Ukraine 68 1 May, 2017 sign odious Petro Shkutiak as a person respon- sible for the inspection, he was not only subject to lustration, and even was involved in corrup- tion fraud. After the resignation, according to the results of competitive selection, Volodymyr Uvarov was chosen for his position. During four month under Uvarov’s leadership the office submitted criminal proceedings to the court in respect of nine prosecutors. The purification of the Prosecutor’s Office on grounds of quality did not happen of the Prosecutor’s Office and possible corrup- Thus, purification of the Prosecutor’s Office on tion risks. Such information has become the grounds of quality did not happen. Competi- basis for performance verification and public tions to the regional Prosecutor’s Offices and scrutiny. But the use of questionnaires caused the GPO were not held. Competitive selection great doubts as to the effectiveness of this was carried out only in the local offices, but the mechanism, because the prosecutors just con- results can hardly be considered satisfactory. firmed or denied a number of allegations and Almost all of the heads and deputy heads of did not provide any specifics. As a result, almost local prosecution offices are from the old sys- zero results were obtained. Instead of layoffs, tem, and the ordinary structure has not been the Prosecutor’s Office issues warnings and rep- restarted. Public confidence in the prosecution rimands to prosecutors. Among 12,5 thousand is declining, the official salary, despite promises, prosecutors only three were brought to disci- remained at an uncompetitive level, and mis- plinary proceedings. management leads to degradation of person- nel of the GPO. Among 12,5 thousand prosecutors only three were brought to disciplinary proceedings The GPO did not carry out renewal of staff on a competitive basis The GPO repeatedly took the competences of the NABU and SAPO that created excessive Yuriy Lutsenko did not offer any plan for the re- competition between old and new anticorrup- form of the Prosecutor’s Office and turning it tion institutions, and contributed to the collapse into a judicial body. The adjustment to the new of cases in court. A vivid example of relations requirements of the Constitution, the law on with the GPO and the newly established anti- prosecution and procedure codes were also corruption institutions was the scandal in August left without attention of the General Prosecu- 2016, when the Prosecutor’s Office detained tor. On the contrary, through lobbying bill No. two detectives of NABU. The statistics is vivid 5177, Yuriy Lutsenko did not seek to narrow the and according to it, by 3.5 times fewer people powers of the prosecution, as required by the were detained for this crime than in 2013 during basic law, but rather to expand them. This issue, the presidency of Viktor Yanukovych. in particular, attracted attention of experts of the Council of Europe, which provided an ap- In 2016 by 3.5 times fewer people were propriate conclusion. In general, we can talk detained for this crime than in 2013 during about the folding of the prosecution that is a the presidency of Viktor Yanukovych confirmation of the unwillingness of the authori- ties to lose control over such an important in- The following cleaning mechanism was the strument of political pressure. creation of the General Inspectorate of the GPO. But the launch of this body was accom- Yurii Lutsenko did not offer any plan for panied by a scandal. Lutsenko decided to as- the reform of the Prosecutor’s Office 2 Inside Ukraine 68 May, 2017 The start of functioning of the prosecutorial self- Without the original letter of Viktor government, the Council of Prosecutors and Yanukovych to Vladimir Putin the Disciplinary Commission (CDC) of prosecutors, case is in a procedural impasse which should form the personnel policy depart- ment also did not happen without scandals. The decision of Interpol on the termination of The fact that the Ukrainian conference of pros- the international investigation of the former ecutors in the last year, until the appointment president and his team was also unexpected of Yuriy Lutsenko, elected their representatives and very unpleasant decision for Yuriy Lutsenko to these bodies. Legal grounds for exemption on the eve of consideration of the case of Vik- of the elected members did not exist, but that tor Yanukovych by the Ukrainian court. The fact did not stop the current management of the is that Article 3 of the Charter of the Interpol Prosecutor’s Office breaking the law and car- says that he can’t be involved in political, reli- rying out a new Ukrainian conference of pros- gious and racial disputes. And the documents ecutors and electing other members to the filed by the Ukrainian side stated that Viktor Ya- prosecution bodies. nukovych became President of Ukraine, head- ed an organized criminal group, consisting of GPO without a legitimate reason the Prime Minister, Ministers and so on. Criminal replaced members of the prosecutorial procedural legislation of Ukraine in this context authorities elected before the is also imperfect, because Viktor Yanukovych, appointment of Yurii Lutsenko despite the open proceeding is not a person to whom the measure of restraint “detention” was applied. And according to the rules of Interpol, On May 4, 2017 in the Obolon district court the person in respect of whom no measure of of Kyiv a preparatory hearing in relation to restraint in a form of detention was chosen can- the long-awaited prosecution of Viktor Yanu- not be declared in the international search. kovych for treason was held. The General Pros- ecutor considers the mere fact that there was the commencement of legal process to be a Yurii Lutsenko considers the case big victory for himself and the result did not par- of Yanukovych as a springboard for a future political campaign ticularly worry him. Lutsenko does not want to see that the procedure of conviction giving a lot of loopholes for lawyers of the fugitive presi- Also, the office of Yuriy Lutsenko held a num- dent, and any deviation from the accepted ber of searches, which was accompanied by a European understanding of the process of con- bright covering in the media. For example, the viction will give the opportunity to successfully GPO searched the two mayors of the cities of appeal the decision to the ECHR. Bucha and Irpin, Kyiv oblast – Anatolii Fedoruk and Volodymyr Karpliuk, who were accused of If we consider the merits of the case, the basic illegal allotment of land plots to people close allegations of Yanukovych are based actually to them. We speak about 890 acres of price- on a single action – the so-called appeal of less forests near Kyiv. However, no arrests took Yanukovych to Russian President Vladimir Putin place, and mayors calmly continue to work at with a request for sending troops to restore or- their jobs. der in Ukraine. But there are serious doubts that the prosecution will be able to comply with the requirements of part 1 of Article 23, part 3 of The activities of Yurii Lutsenko is more focused on creating beautiful images for the Article 99 of the Criminal Procedural Code and media than to achieve actual legal result will provide the court with the original letter, and the examination will state the authenticity of the signature.

Load more

  18

Copy Link