DOCSLIB.ORG

46 CFR Ch. I (10–1–14 Edition) Pt. 150, App. I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
46 CFR Ch. I (10–1–14 Edition) Pt. 150, App. I Pt. 150, App. I 46 CFR Ch. I (10–1–14 Edition) APPENDIX I TO PART 150—EXCEPTIONS Member of reactive group Compatible with TO THE CHART Propylene glycol (20) (a) The binary combinations listed below Oleum (0) ............................... Hexane (31) have been tested as prescribed in Appendix Dichloromethane (36) III and found not to be dangerously reactive. Perchloroethylene (36) These combinations are exceptions to the 1,2-Propylene glycol (20) ...... Diethylenetriamine (7) Compatibility Chart (Figure 1) and may be Polyethylene polyamines (7) Triethylenetetramine (7) stowed in adjacent tanks. Sodium dichromate, 70% (0) Methyl alcohol (20) Member of reactive group Compatible with Sodium hydrosulfide solution Methyl alcohol (20) (5). Acetone (18) .......................... Diethylenetriamine (7) Iso-Propyl alcohol (20) Acetone cyanohydrin (0) ....... Acetic acid (4) Sulfuric acid (2) ..................... Coconut oil (34) Acrylonitrile (15) ..................... Triethanolamine (8) Coconut oil acid (34) Palm oil (34) 1,3-Butylene glycol (20) ......... Morpholine (7) Tallow (34) 1,4-Butylene glycol (20) ......... Ethylamine (7) Sulfuric acid, 98% or less (2) Choice white grease tallow Triethanolamine (8) (34) gamma-Butyrolactone (0) ...... N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (9) Caustic potash, 50% or less Isobutyl alcohol (20) (b) The binary combinations listed below (5). Ethyl alcohol (20) have been determined to be dangerously re- Ethylene glycol (20) active, based on either data obtained in the Isopropyl alcohol (20) Methyl alcohol (20) literature or on laboratory testing which has iso-Octyl alcohol (20) been carried out in accordance with proce- Caustic soda, 50% or less (5) Butyl alcohol (20) dures prescribed in Appendix III. These com- tert-Butyl alcohol, Methanol binations are exceptions to the Compat- mixtures ibility Chart (Figure 1) and may not be Decyl alcohol (20) stowed in adjacent tanks. iso-Decyl alcohol (20) Diacetone alcohol (20) Acetone cyanohydrin (0) is not compatible Diethylene glycol (40) with Groups 1-12, 16, 17 and 22. Dodecyl alcohol (20) Acrolein (19) is not compatible with Group 1, Ethyl alcohol (20) Non-Oxidizing Mineral Acids. Ethyl alcohol (40%, whiskey) (20) Acrylic acid (4) is not compatible with Group Ethylene glycol (20) 9, Aromatic Amines. Ethylene glycol, Diethylene Acrylonitrile (15) is not compatible with glycol mixture (20) Group 5 (Caustics). Ethyl hexanol (Octyl alcohol) (20) Alkylbenzenesulfonic acid (0) is not compat- Methyl alcohol (20) ible with Groups 1-3, 5-9, 15, 16, 18, 19, 30, 34, Nonyl alcohol (20) 37, and strong oxidizers. iso-Nonyl alcohol (20) Allyl alcohol (15) is not compatible with Propyl alcohol (20) iso-Propyl alcohol (20) Group 12, Isocyanates. Propylene glycol (20) Alkyl(C7–C9) nitrates (34) is not compatible Sodium chlorate solution (0) with Group 1, Non-oxidizing Mineral Acids. iso-Tridecanol (20) Aluminum sulfate solution (43) is not com- tert-Dodecanethiol (0) ............ Acrylonitrile (15) patible with Groups 5-11. Diisodecyl phthalate (34) Methyl ethyl ketone (18) Ammonium bisulfite solution (43) is not iso-Nonyl alcohol (20) compatible with Groups 1, 3, 4, and 5. Perchloroethylene (36) Benzenesulfonyl chloride (0) is not compat- iso-Propyl alcohol (20) Tall oil, crude ible with Groups 5-7, and 43. Dodecyl and Tetradecylamine Tall oil, fatty acid (34) 1,4-Butylene glycol (20) is not compatible mixture (7). with Caustic soda solution, 50% or less (5). Ethylenediamine (7) ............... Butyl alcohol (20) gamma-Butyrolactone (0) is not compatible tert-Butyl alcohol (20) with Groups 1-9. Butylene glycol (20) Creosote (21) C9 Resinfeed (DSM) (32) is not compatible Diethylene glycol (40) with Group 2, Sulfuric acid. Ethyl alcohol (20) Carbon tetrachloride (36) is not compatible Ethylene glycol (20) with Tetraethylenepentamine or Ethyl hexanol (20) Glycerine (20) Triethylenetetramine, both Group 7, Ali- Isononyl alcohol (20) phatic amines. Isophorone (18) Catoxid feedstock (36) is not compatible with Methyl butyl ketone (18) Group 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 12. Methyl iso-butyl ketone (18) Methyl ethyl ketone (18) Caustic soda solution, 50% or less (5) is not Propyl alcohol (20) compatible with 1,4-Butylene glycol (20). 116 VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:32 Nov 04, 2014 Jkt 232202 PO 00000 Frm 00126 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8002 Q:\46\46V5.TXT 31 Coast Guard, DHS Pt. 150, App. I 1-(4-Chlorophenyl)-4,4-dimethyl pentan-3-one Methyl tert-butyl ether (41) is not compat- (18) is not compatible with Group 5 ible with Group 1, Non-oxidizing Mineral (Caustics) or 10 (Amides). Acids. Crotonaldehyde (19) is not compatible with NIAX POLYOL APP 240C (0) is not compat- Group 1, Non-Oxidizing Mineral Acids. ible with Group 2, 3, 5, 7, or 12. Cyclohexanone, Cyclohexanol mixture (18) is o-Nitrophenol (0) is not compatible with not compatible with Group 12, Isocyanates. Groups 2, 3, and 5-10. 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, Octyl nitrates (all isomers), see Alkyl(C7–C9) Triisopropanolamine salt solution (43) is nitrates. not compatible with Group 3, Nitric Acid. Oleum (0) is not compatible with Sulfuric 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, Dimethyl- acid (2) and 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (36). amine salt solution (0) is not compatible Phthalate based polyester polyol (0) is not with Groups 1-5, 11, 12, and 16. compatible with group 2, 3, 5, 7 and 12. Diethylenetriamine (7) is not compatible Polyglycerine, Sodium salts solution (20) is with 1,2,3-Trichloropropane, Group 36, Hal- not compatible with Groups 1, 4, 11, 16, 17, ogenated hydrocarbons. 19, 21 and 22. Dimethyl hydrogen phosphite (34) is not Propylene, Propane, MAPP gas mixture compatible with Groups 1 and 4. (containing 12% or less MAPP gas) (30) is Dimethyl naphthalene sulfonic acid, sodium not compatible with Group 1 (Non-oxi- salt solution (34) is not compatible with dizing mineral acids), Group 36 (Halo- Group 12, Formaldehyde, and strong oxi- genated hydrocarbons), nitrogen dioxide, dizing agents. oxidizing materials, or molten sulfur. Dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid (0) is not com- Sodium acetate, Glycol, Water mixture (1% patible with oxidizing agents and Groups 1, or less Sodium hydroxide) (34) is not com- 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 15, 16, 18, 19, 30, 34, and 37. patible with Group 12 (Isocyanates). Ethylenediamine (7) and Ethyleneamine EA 1302 (7) are not compatible with either Sodium chlorate solution (50% or less) (0) is Ethylene dichloride (36) or 1,2,3- not compatible with Groups 1-3, 5, 7, 8, 10, Trichloropropane (36). 12, 13, 17 and 20. Ethylene dichloride (36) is not compatible Sodium dichromate solution (70% or less) (0) with Ethylenediamine (7) or is not compatible with Groups 1-3, 5, 7, 8, Ethyleneamine EA 1302 (7). 10, 12, 13, 17 and 20. Ethylidene norbornene (30) is not compatible Sodium dimethyl naphthalene sulfonate so- with Groups 1-3 and 5-8. lution (34) is not compatible with Group 12, Formaldehyde and strong oxidizing agents. 2-Ethyl-3-propylacrolein (19) is not compat- ible with Group 1, Non-Oxidizing Mineral Sodium hydrogen sulfide, Sodium carbonate Acids. solution (0) is not compatible with Groups 6 (Ammonia) and 7 (Aliphatic amines). Ethyl tert-butyl ether (41) is not compatible with Group 1, Non-oxidizing mineral acids. Sodium hydrosulfide (5) is not compatible with Groups 6 (Ammonia) and 7 (Aliphatic Ferric hydroxyethylethylenediamine amines). triacetic acid, Sodium salt solution (43) is not compatible with Group 3, Nitric acid. Sodium hydrosulfide, Ammonium sulfide so- Fish oil (34) is not compatible with Sulfuric lution (5) is not compatible with Groups 6 acid (2). (Ammonia) and 7 (Aliphatic amines). Formaldehyde (over 50%) in Methyl alcohol Sodium polyacrylate solution (43) is not (over 30%) (19) is not compatible with compatible with Group 3, Nitric Acid. Group 12, Isocyanates. Sodium silicate solution (43) is not compat- Formic acid (4) is not compatible with Fur- ible with Group 3, Nitric Acid. fural alcohol (20). Sodium sulfide, hydrosulfide solution (0) is Furfuryl alcohol (20) is not compatible with not compatible with Groups 6 (Ammonia) Group 1, Non-Oxidizing Mineral Acids and and 7 (Aliphatic amines). Formic acid (4). Sodium thiocyanate (56% or less) (0) is not 2-Hydroxyethyl acrylate (14) is not compat- compatible with Groups 1-4. ible with Group 5, 6, or 12. Sulfonated polyacrylate solution (43) is not Isophorone (18) is not compatible with Group compatible with Group 5 (Caustics). 8, Alkanolamines. Sulfuric acid (2) is not compatible with Fish Magnesium chloride solution (0) is not com- oil (34), or Oleum (0). patible with Groups 2, 3, 5, 6 and 12. Tall oil fatty acid (Resin acids less than 20%) Mesityl oxide (18) is not compatible with (34) is not compatible with Group 5, Group 8, Alkanolamines. Caustics. Methacrylonitrile (15) is not compatible with Tallow fatty acid (34) is not compatible with Group 5 (Caustics). Group 5, Caustics. 117 VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:32 Nov 04, 2014 Jkt 232202 PO 00000 Frm 00127 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8002 Q:\46\46V5.TXT 31 Pt. 150, App. I, Nt. 46 CFR Ch. I (10–1–14 Edition) Tetraethylenepentamine (7) is not compat- Trimethyl phosphite (34) is not compatible ible with Carbon tetrachloride, Group 36, with Groups 1 and 4. Halogenated hydrocarbons. 1,3,5-Trioxane (41) is not compatible with 1,2,3-Trichloropropane (36) is not compatible Group 1 (non-oxidizing mineral acids) and with Diethylenetriamine, Ethylene- Group 4 (Organic acids). diamine, Ethyleaneamine EA 1302, or [CGD 88–100, 54 FR 40012, Sept. 29, 1989 as Triethylenetetramine, all Group 7, Ali- amended by CGD 88–100, 55 FR 17277, Apr. 24, phatic amines. 1990; CDG 92–100, 59 FR 17026, Apr. 11, 1994; 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (36) is not compatible CGD 94–902, 60 FR 34043, June 29, 1995; CGD with Oleum (0). 95–900, 60 FR 34050, June 29, 1995; USCG 2000– 7079, 65 FR 67182, Nov. 8, 2000] Trichloroethylene (36) is not compatible with Group 5, Caustics. EFFECTIVE DATE NOTE: By USCG–2013–0423, 78 FR 50205, Aug.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gasket Chemical Services Guide
    Gasket Chemical Services Guide Revision: GSG-100 6490 Rev.(AA) • The information contained herein is general in nature and recommendations are valid only for Victaulic compounds. • Gasket compatibility is dependent upon a number of factors. Suitability for a particular application must be determined by a competent individual familiar with system-specific conditions. • Victaulic offers no warranties, expressed or implied, of a product in any application. Contact your Victaulic sales representative to ensure the best gasket is selected for a particular service. Failure to follow these instructions could cause system failure, resulting in serious personal injury and property damage. Rating Code Key 1 Most Applications 2 Limited Applications 3 Restricted Applications (Nitrile) (EPDM) Grade E (Silicone) GRADE L GRADE T GRADE A GRADE V GRADE O GRADE M (Neoprene) GRADE M2 --- Insufficient Data (White Nitrile) GRADE CHP-2 (Epichlorohydrin) (Fluoroelastomer) (Fluoroelastomer) (Halogenated Butyl) (Hydrogenated Nitrile) Chemical GRADE ST / H Abietic Acid --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Acetaldehyde 2 3 3 3 3 --- --- 2 --- 3 Acetamide 1 1 1 1 2 --- --- 2 --- 3 Acetanilide 1 3 3 3 1 --- --- 2 --- 3 Acetic Acid, 30% 1 2 2 2 1 --- 2 1 2 3 Acetic Acid, 5% 1 2 2 2 1 --- 2 1 1 3 Acetic Acid, Glacial 1 3 3 3 3 --- 3 2 3 3 Acetic Acid, Hot, High Pressure 3 3 3 3 3 --- 3 3 3 3 Acetic Anhydride 2 3 3 3 2 --- 3 3 --- 3 Acetoacetic Acid 1 3 3 3 1 --- --- 2 --- 3 Acetone 1 3 3 3 3 --- 3 3 3 3 Acetone Cyanohydrin 1 3 3 3 1 --- --- 2 --- 3 Acetonitrile 1 3 3 3 1 --- --- --- --- 3 Acetophenetidine 3 2 2 2 3 --- --- --- --- 1 Acetophenone 1 3 3 3 3 --- 3 3 --- 3 Acetotoluidide 3 2 2 2 3 --- --- --- --- 1 Acetyl Acetone 1 3 3 3 3 --- 3 3 --- 3 The data and recommendations presented are based upon the best information available resulting from a combination of Victaulic's field experience, laboratory testing and recommendations supplied by prime producers of basic copolymer materials.
    [Show full text]
  • EPA/Diethylenetriamine
    Thursday May 23~1~S5 Part~ Environmental. Protection Agency 40 CFR Part 79S Dlsthyl.ne1flamine identification ~ Specific chemical Substance and MkU~e testhig Requirements; Final Rule Dl.thyfert.trlamlne; Proposed Teat Rule; — Rule JI~ 21398 Federal Register f Vol. 50. No. 100 1 Thursday, May 23. 1985 / Rules and Regulations ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION chemical fate testing (underaerobic relevant to assessing the risks to health AGENCY conditions only) for DETA. and the environment posed by exposure 1. Introduction to particular chemical substances or 40 CER Pal 799 This notice is part of the overall mixtures. implementation of section 4 of the Toxic Under section 4(a)(1) of TSCA. EPA (OPTS-420129 19*4-FRI. 2815-Sal Substances Control Act(TSCA, Pub. L. must require testing of a chemical 94.-469, 90 Stat 2003 etseq.. 15 US.C. substance to develop health or Idantificatlon of Specific Chsnilcal environmentaldata if the Administrator Substance and Mixture Testing 2801 et seq.) whichcontains authority R.qulrem.ntLD4.thylen.thamln. for EPA to require development of data finds that: AOSNCY Environmental Protection (A)(i) th. manufacture, distribution in commerce, proc. Agency (EPA). eonng, use, or disposal of a chemical substanceor mixture, or that .*CT*Osc Final rule. any combination of such activities, may present an unreasonable riakof injuryto health or the environment, (n) there are insu~cientdata and.aqerience upon which the ai~anv:This rule establishes testing effects of such manufacture, distribution in commerce, processing, requirements under section 4(a) of the ma,or disposal.of such substance or iI~iThweor of any combine- Toxic Substances Control Act(TSCA) tion of such activities on health or thf.Invironment can reason- for manufacturers and processorsof ably be determined or predicted, and diethylenetriamine (DETA~CAS No.
    [Show full text]
  • Possible Applications of Diethylenetriamine (Deta) in Co2 Capturing- a Mini - Review
    ___________________ POSSIBLE APPLICATIONS OF DIETHYLENETRIAMINE (DETA) IN CO2 CAPTURING- A MINI - REVIEW Rawat N1,*, Iglič A1,2, Gimsa J3 1Laboratory of Physics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia 2Laboratory of Clinical Biophysics, Chair, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia 3University of Rostock, Chair for Biophysics, Gertrudenstr. 11A, 18057 Rostock, Germany *[email protected] Abstract In the past decades, reduction of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions into the atmosphere has become a challenging goal. Capturing the CO2 directly before storage is becoming a thriving alternative approach. Septavaux et al. (1) have proposed a CO2 fixation method using diethylenetriamine (DETA) to produce a range of carbamation species that can be used for metal separation and recovery. They could show that lanthanum and nickel can be separated from the exhaust gases of vehicle engines by successive CO2-induced selective precipitations. Individual metal components of La2Ni9Co alloys used to manufacture batteries for electric vehicles can also be separated. Here we suggest to use DETA as a mediator for an attractive interaction between like-charged macroions. ___________________ 79 1. Introduction Carbon dioxide (CO2) emission into the atmosphere has increased at an alarming rate. In order to reduce CO2 emissions, adequate measures for CO2 capture and storage (CCS) or utilization (CCU) need to be taken (2). Since CCS is expensive therefore more attention is directed towards CCU because it has other economic advantages. CCU would significantly reduce the cost of storage due to recycling of CO2 for further usage. In this context, Septavaux et al. (1) recently showed that the cost of CO2 capturing with the industrial polyamine DETA can be reduced even further with another environmentally beneficial process (3).
    [Show full text]
  • SYNTHESIS and IMMOBILIZATION on SILICA GEL by ZUANG-CONG
    MACROCYCLIC MULTIDENTATE LIGANDS: SYNTHESIS AND IMMOBILIZATION ON SILICA GEL by ZUANG-CONG LU, B.S. in Ch.E., M.S. in Ch.E. A THESIS IN CHEMISTRY Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Approved Accepted December, 1990 N) ni />._ <? ACKNOWLEDGEMENI^ .AJ f z My family and I will always be indebted to Professor Richard A, Bartsch for his guidance, support and understanding. I would like to thank my friends and coworkers for their enthusiasm, encourage­ ment and friendship. Finally, I need to thank Mr. Robert Alldredge, president of Serpentix Incorporated, for the support of my research. 11 Ill TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ii LIST OF TABLES vii LIST OF FIGURES viii I. INTRODUCTION 1 General 1 Crown ether background 1 Factors affecting cation complexation 3 Immobilization of Azacrown Ethers on Silica Gel 7 The mechanism of silylation 1 5 Statement of Research Goals 2 1 n. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 2 3 Synthesis of Structurally Modified Dibenzo-16-crown-5 Compounds 2 3 Synthesis of sym-ketodibenzo-16-crown-5 (14) 2 3 Synthesis of sym-(decyl)hydroxydibenzo- 16-crown-5 (H) 2 5 Synthesis of 3-[sym-(decyl)dibenzo- 16-crown-5-oxy]propanesulfonic acid (17) 2 6 Synthesis of Structurally Modified Dibenzo-14-crown-4 Compounds 2 6 IV Synthesis of l,3-bis(2-hydroxyphenoxy) propane (18) 2 8 Synthesis of sym-vinylidenedibenzo- 14-crown-4 (21). 2 9 Synthesis of sym-hydroxydibenzo- 14-crown-4 (19.) 3 0 Synthesis of sym-(phenyl)hydroxydibenzo- 14-crown-4 (21) (Route 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Health Hazard Evaluation Report 1984-023-1462
    Health Hazard Evaluation HETA 84-023-1462 DALE ELECTRONICS1 INCORPORATED Report YANKTON1 SOUTH DAKOTA PREFACE The Hazard Evaluations and Technical Assistance Branch of NIOSH conducts field investigations of possible health hazards in the workplace. These investigations are conducted under the authority of Section 20{a)(6) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, 29 U.S.C. 669{a){6) which authorizes the Secretary of Health and Human Services, following a written request from any employer or authorized representative of employees, to determine whether any substance normally found in the place of employment has potentially toxic effects in such concentrations as used or found. The Hazard Evaluations and Technical Assistance Branch also provides, upon request, medical, nursing, and industrial hygiene technical and consultative assistance (TA) to Federal, state, and local agencies; labor; ·industry and other groups or individuals to control occupational health hazards and to prevent related trauma and disease. Mention of company names or products does not constitute enoorsement by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. HETA 84-023-1462 NIOSH INVESTIGATOR: MAY 1984 Steven A. Lee, M.S., C.I.H. DALE ELECTRONICS, INCORPORATED YANKTON, SOUTH DAKOTA I. SUMMARY In October 1963, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) received a request for an industrial hygiene survey of electronic resistor manufacturing processes at Dale Electronics, Inc. in Yankton, South Dakota. On December 20-21, 1S83, NIOSH investigators conducted environmental sampling at the plant. Air samples were collected for 2,4-toluene diisocyanate (TOI), organic solvent vapors, mercury, lead, diethylene triamine (DETA), triorthocresyl phosphate (TOCP), and Bisphenol A.
    [Show full text]
  • Fluorine-18-Labeled Fluorescent Dyes for Dual-Mode Molecular Imaging
    molecules Review Fluorine-18-Labeled Fluorescent Dyes for Dual-Mode Molecular Imaging Maxime Munch 1,2,*, Benjamin H. Rotstein 1,2 and Gilles Ulrich 3 1 University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4W7, Canada; [email protected] 2 Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada 3 Institut de Chimie et Procédés pour l’Énergie, l’Environnement et la Santé (ICPEES), UMR CNRS 7515, École Européenne de Chimie, Polymères et Matériaux (ECPM), 25 rue Becquerel, CEDEX 02, 67087 Strasbourg, France; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-613-696-7000 Academic Editor: Emmanuel Gras Received: 30 November 2020; Accepted: 16 December 2020; Published: 21 December 2020 Abstract: Recent progress realized in the development of optical imaging (OPI) probes and devices has made this technique more and more affordable for imaging studies and fluorescence-guided surgery procedures. However, this imaging modality still suffers from a low depth of penetration, thus limiting its use to shallow tissues or endoscopy-based procedures. In contrast, positron emission tomography (PET) presents a high depth of penetration and the resulting signal is less attenuated, allowing for imaging in-depth tissues. Thus, association of these imaging techniques has the potential to push back the limits of each single modality. Recently, several research groups have been involved in the development of radiolabeled fluorophores with the aim of affording dual-mode PET/OPI probes used in preclinical imaging studies of diverse pathological conditions such as cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, or cardiovascular diseases. Among all the available PET-active radionuclides, 18F stands out as the most widely used for clinical imaging thanks to its advantageous characteristics (t1/2 = 109.77 min; 97% β+ emitter).
    [Show full text]
  • (DETA)-CO2 and Amine Degradation Products Systems and an Introductory Modeling Approach
    Characterization of Corrosion patterns of Stainless Steel in Diethylenetriamine (DETA)-CO2 and amine degradation products systems and an Introductory Modeling Approach Ebenezer Hayfron- Benjamin Chemical Engineering Submission date: July 2013 Supervisor: Hallvard Fjøsne Svendsen, IKP Norwegian University of Science and Technology Department of Chemical Engineering Preface This master‘s thesis with the course code -TKP4900 Kjemisk Prosesstekn Vår 2013- is a part of the fulfillment of the requirements for a Master of Science degree in the field of Chemical Engineering and which was undertaken during the spring of 2013. The work was carried out at the CO2 absorption research labs in the Environmental Engineering and Reactor Technology Group located at the Department of Chemical Engineering, at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) in Trondheim. I declare that this is an independent work according to the exam regulations of the Norwegian University of Science and Technology. All experimental set-ups, literature review, results and interpretations therein were solely done by the author and also the author adhered to the highest standards of ethics and integrity for scientific reporting. …………………………………………………….. Ebenezer Hayfron-Benjamin Trondheim, July 4, 2013 i ii Acknowledgements The successful completion of this work which spanned the duration of spring of 2013 wouldn‘t have been possible without the help of many individuals and professionals. Different people helped out in different times, some advice, some corrections, others lending me the use of scientific equipment and tools in order to further broaden the scope and depth of this work. I would like to take the time to express my deepest appreciations, respect and honor to all who helped in one way or the other.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Resistance Guide CHEMICAL RESISTANCE GUIDE
    Chemical Resistance Guide CHEMICAL RESISTANCE GUIDE This Chemical Resistance Guide incorporates three (800) 430-4110. North also offers ezGuide™,an Key to Degradation and Permeation Ratings types of information: interactive software program which is designed to electronically help you select the proper glove for E - Excellent Exposure has little or no effect. The glove retains its properties after extended exposure • Degradation (D) is a deleterious change in one use against specific chemicals. This "user friendly" G - Good Exposure has minor effect with long term exposure. Short term exposure has little or no effect or more of the glove’s physical properties. The guide walks you step-by-step through the process most obvious forms of degradation are the loss to determine what type of glove to wear and its F - Fair Exposure causes moderate degradation of the glove. Glove is still useful after short term of the glove’s strength and excessive swelling. permeation resistance to the selected contaminant. exposure but caution should be exercised with extended exposure Several published degradation lists (primarily Product features, benefits and ordering information P - Poor Short term exposure will result in moderate degradation to complete destruction “The General Chemical Resistance of Various of the suggested products also are included in the Elastomers” by the Los Angeles Rubber Group, program. ezGuide can be accessed from the North N/D Permeation was not detected during the test Inc.) were used to determine degradation. web site, www.northsafety.com or ordered I/D Insufficient data to make a recommendation • Breakthrough time (BT) is defined as the elapsed by e-mailing us at [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Compatibility Chart
    Chemical Compatibility Chart 1 Inorganic Acids 1 2 Organic acids X 2 3 Caustics X X 3 4 Amines & Alkanolamines X X 4 5 Halogenated Compounds X X X 5 6 Alcohols, Glycols & Glycol Ethers X 6 7 Aldehydes X X X X X 7 8 Ketone X X X X 8 9 Saturated Hydrocarbons 9 10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons X 10 11 Olefins X X 11 12 Petrolum Oils 12 13 Esters X X X 13 14 Monomers & Polymerizable Esters X X X X X X 14 15 Phenols X X X X 15 16 Alkylene Oxides X X X X X X X X 16 17 Cyanohydrins X X X X X X X 17 18 Nitriles X X X X X 18 19 Ammonia X X X X X X X X X 19 20 Halogens X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 21 Ethers X X X 21 22 Phosphorus, Elemental X X X X 22 23 Sulfur, Molten X X X X X X 23 24 Acid Anhydrides X X X X X X X X X X 24 X Represents Unsafe Combinations Represents Safe Combinations Group 1: Inorganic Acids Dichloropropane Chlorosulfonic acid Dichloropropene Hydrochloric acid (aqueous) Ethyl chloride Hydrofluoric acid (aqueous) Ethylene dibromide Hydrogen chloride (anhydrous) Ethylene dichloride Hydrogen fluoride (anhydrous) Methyl bromide Nitric acid Methyl chloride Oleum Methylene chloride Phosphoric acid Monochlorodifluoromethane Sulfuric acid Perchloroethylene Propylene dichloride Group 2: Organic Acids 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene Acetic acid 1,1,1-Trichloroethane Butyric acid (n-) Trichloroethylene Formic acid Trichlorofluoromethane Propionic acid Rosin Oil Group 6: Alcohols, Glycols and Glycol Ethers Tall oil Allyl alcohol Amyl alcohol Group 3: Caustics 1,4-Butanediol Caustic potash solution Butyl alcohol (iso, n, sec, tert) Caustic soda solution Butylene
    [Show full text]
  • Branched Poly(Gamma-Stearyl-L-Glutamate). Drew Scott Op Che Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1990 Synthesis and Characterization of Linear and Star - Branched Poly(gamma-Stearyl-L-Glutamate). Drew Scott oP che Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Poche, Drew Scott, "Synthesis and Characterization of Linear and Star -Branched Poly(gamma-Stearyl-L-Glutamate)." (1990). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 5017. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/5017 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Polyamines Potentiate Responses of N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptors
    Proc. Nadl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 87, pp. 9971-9974, December 1990 Neurobiology Polyamines potentiate responses of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes (glutamate/excitatory neurotransmitter/spermine/synaptic transmission) JAMES F. MCGURK, MICHAEL V. L. BENNETT, AND R. SUZANNE ZUKIN Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461 Contributed by Michael V. L. Bennett, September 19, 1990 ABSTRACT Glutamate, the major excitatory neurotrans- tiate the NMDA response. Moreover, spermine increased the mitter in the central nervous system, activates at least three affinity of the receptor for glycine without affecting its inter- types of channel-forming receptors defined by the selective action with NMDA (31, 32). agonists N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA), kainate, and quis- Polyamines have been shown to have a range of effects on qualate [or more selectively by a-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl- responses of glutamate receptors in hippocampal neurons 4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA)]. Activation of the NMDA (33) and in Xenopus oocytes injected with messenger RNA receptor requires glycine as well as NMDA or glutamate. (mRNA) from rat and chicken brain (34). Spermine potenti- Recent studies have provided evidence that certain polyamines ated NMDA-induced currents in hippocampal neurons while potentiate the binding by NMDA receptors of glycine and the 1,10-diaminodecane decreased them; diethylenetriamine had open channel blocker MK-801. To determine whether poly- no action on NMDA responses but antagonized actions of amines alter channel opening, we examined their effects on rat both spermine and 1,10-diaminodecane, which may therefore brain glutamate receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes.
    [Show full text]
  • Determination of Serum Spermidine by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography After Fluorescence Derivatization Title with Orthophthalaldehyde
    Determination of Serum Spermidine by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography after Fluorescence Derivatization Title with Orthophthalaldehyde Author(s) Miura, Toshiaki; Yoshimura, Teruki; Ohgiya, Satoru; Kamataki, Tetsuya Citation 北海道大学医療技術短期大学部紀要, 8, 209-217 Issue Date 1995-12 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/37583 Type bulletin (article) Note Report File Information 8_209-218.pdf Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP Report Deterrnination of Serum Spermidine by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography after Fluorescence Derivatization with Orthophthalaldehyde Toshiaki Miura, Teruki Yoshimura', Satoru Ohgiya" and Tetsuya Kamataki"' Abstract A sensitive method was developed for the determination of serum polyamines, which consisted of (1) deproteinization with perchloric acid, (2) separation of spermidine from amino acids by CM-Sephadex C-25 column chromatography, (3) pre-column derivatization with orthophthalaldehyde, and (4) high-performance liquid chromatography on SP-5PW cation exchanger with fluorescence detection. The detection limit (S/N =3) of the present method was O.5 pmol per injection, which allowed the assay of spermidine with a small volume of serum. Linearity, recovery and reproducibility of the method were highly satisfatory. The concentrations of spermidine in sera were determined to be 93.2±31.2 and 83.0±27.9 pmol/ml (mean ± SD) for healthy men (n=22) and women (n::=18) vol- unteers, respectively, Introduction Polyamine level in biological fluids has recently attracted
    [Show full text]