DOCSLIB.ORG

Township of Edison Master Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Township of Edison Master Plan EDISON MASTER PLAN INTRODUCTION 1.0 Introduction This Master Plan has been prepared in accordance with the requirements set forth in New Jersey Statutes Annotated 40:55D and under the direction of the Master Plan Advisory Committee. It is intended to provide a careful assessment of the existing use of land and serve as a guide for future growth and development in Edison. Edison last adopted a comprehensive Master Plan in 1989. A municipal master plan provides a vision for the future growth of a community. It analyzes statistical trends, problems and opportunities, and provides a methodology and offers recommendations to address those issues and opportunities. The Master Plan strives to examine the rate and nature of past and present development, the future development potential under existing zoning parameters and environmental constraints, and the capacity of existing infrastructure to serve projected growth. A Land Use Plan balancing Edison’s growth potential with its growth capacity through recommended changes to Land Use and Zoning Ordinance as well as a Future Land Use map has been provided. The Future Land Use plan specifically calls for anti-sprawl initiatives based on the design principles of New Urbanism. Numerous public meetings were held to elicit public comment and address public concern relative to land planning in Edison. The Master Plan Advisory Committee, Open Space Advisory Committee and Board of Education met on many separate occasions to discuss each individual Master Plan Element and enriched the planning process with their input. The professionals retained to prepare the Master Plan utilized this input to guide and develop the Plan. 1 EDISON MASTER PLAN 2.0 Regional Context dison, located in Middlesex County, 2.2 DESCRIPTION OF PLANNING E encompasses a land area of 30.17 square miles. DISTRICTS Several major road networks including the NJ Turnpike and US Routes 1, 27, and 287 traverse Planning District 1 Edison, providing the municipality with excellent This PD includes the northern portion of Edison regional highway access. Edison is bordered on the bounded to the west by South Plainfield (Woodland north by Scotch Plains Township and Clark Avenue); to the north by Scotch Plains and Clark; Township, on the west by Piscataway Township to the south by Oak Tree Road; and, to the east by and the Borough of South Plainfield, on the Woodbridge. southwest by the Borough of Highland Park, on the south by the Raritan River, and exclusively on the Planning District 2 east by Woodbridge Township. The Borough of This PD includes the eastern portion of Edison Metuchen is located in the center. bounded by Oak Tree Road to the north; the Lehigh Valley (Conrail) Railroad to the south; Metuchen to For the purposes of this Master Plan, Edison has the west; and, Woodbridge to the east. been divided into five Planning Districts (PD’s), which are described below and depicted graphically Planning District 3 on the following map. It should be noted that these This PD includes the western portion of Edison districts have been determined for purposes of south of Oak Tree Road from Grove Avenue to the presentation in this report and are not intended to South Plainfield border and extending south to the serve as criteria for basing zoning district Northeast Corridor transit rail line. modifications. The PD’s herein have been created due to the size and scale of Edison and the desire Planning District 4 to provide manageable graphics easily interpreted This PD includes the south-central portion of by the average reader. Each PD was created Edison, bounded by the Northeast Corridor transit utilizing three basic parameters: rail line to the north; Route 1 to the south; Highland Park to the west; and, Metuchen to the east. 2.1 CRITERIA FOR PLANNING DISTRICTS Planning District 5 This PD includes the southern portion of Edison 1. Configuration of Census Tracts for ease of from the Raritan River waterfront north to the census data manipulation; Lehigh Valley (Conrail) Railroad. PD five, which 2. A balance of population and/or land area is bisected by the NJ Turnpike, is bound by Route 1 among the districts; and, and Metuchen to the west. The municipal 3. Recognition of prominent physical boundary of Woodbridge Township forms the boundaries such as railroad rights-of-way eastern border of this PD. and major roadways. 2 EDISON MASTER PLAN REGIONAL CONTEXT The following table identifies the Census Tract designations associated with each PD. TABLE 2.1-1 Census Tracts By Planning District PLANNING CENSUS TRACTS ( 2000) DISTRICT One 14.09 14.10 14.11 14.12 14.13 Two 14.16 14.17 19.01 19.02 19.03 Three 14.14 14.15 15.03 15.04 Four 15.02 16.00 17.01 17.02 Five 18.03 18.04 18.05 18.06 3 EDISON MASTER PLAN REGIONAL CONTEXT Planning District Boundaries Map 4 EDISON MASTER PLAN 3.0 Goals & Objectives COMMUNITY VISION centers including but not limited to Amboy Avenue, the Revlon Property, the Ford The following goals and objectives have been Property, the Jackson Avenue identified to guide future growth, development and Redevelopment Area, and the Seaport redevelopment and create a vision for Edison. The Village. goals and objectives have been prepared under the assumption that they will have a positive influence LAND USE on the future direction of Edison and shape policies guiding land use decisions and development Encourage Edison to develop as an urban/suburban practices. The individual elements of this municipality with a balanced mix of institutional, comprehensive Master Plan will provide a careful commercial and industrial land uses and housing and in-depth analysis of land use issues and the types predicated on the design principles of New furtherance of the herein stated goals and Urbanism along with ample community facilities objectives. Said elements have been enriched and and recreational amenities while preserving the validated by public comment and review by the riverfront landscape and other natural resources of Planning Board. Edison. ♦ Encourage the preservation of distinct, ♦ Provide for future growth and development cohesive neighborhoods. of Edison’s ratable base, including but not limited to the Raritan Center Industrial ♦ Encourage well designed, anti-sprawl land Park, Heller Industrial Park, Jackson development that is consistent with Avenue Redevelopment Area, Ford established neighborhoods and land use Property, Revlon Property, Route 1 and patterns while preserving the community’s Route 27 corridors and the Seaport Village. suburban and urban landscapes which make Edison a unique and desirable place to both ♦ Analyze existing land use patterns and live and work. underlying zoning and make recommendations for changes where ♦ Consistent with recommendations in the incongruous land uses directly abut one State Development and Redevelopment another. Plan for Metropolitan Planning Areas, capitalize on opportunities for ♦ Continue efforts to develop Clara Barton’s redevelopment. downtown by developing a relationship between the downtown to the Clara Barton ♦ Encourage new development consistent neighborhood and encouraging small with the scale of established land uses while business development and streetscape and preserving the character and developed façade improvement programs along nature of existing neighborhoods and Amboy Avenue. proximate land uses at densities which consider available vacant land. ♦ Develop a mixed-use civic center central to Edison. ♦ Encourage the continued development of existing and potential business corridors and 5 EDISON MASTER PLAN GOALS & OBJECTIVES conforming land uses and variance requests ♦ In accordance with State Plan policies and and to encourage residents and taxpayers to procedures, encourage future development make improvements to their dwellings. to occur at appropriate locations and intensity in accordance with transportation CIRCULATION and environmental capacities and anti- sprawl initiatives. ♦ Develop a safe and efficient circulation system capitalizing on Edison’s excellent ♦ Discourage deviations from established land regional highway access and multi-modal use patterns that would permit incompatible transportation system. and/or conflicting land uses being developed adjacent to one another; where ♦ Improve on Edison’s existing transit appropriate amend zoning to prohibit systems to develop an enhanced multi- incongruous land uses. modal system capitalizing on intra- municipal transit including Edison Light ♦ Where new development is proposed on Transit, passenger and freight ferry service, raw, undeveloped land, an effort should be the ongoing Transit Study, and Bicycle made to preserve mature specimen trees and Master Plan. other significant on-site vegetation through ordinance amendments targeted at tree ♦ Review problem and congested preservation. intersections and make specific recommendations in the Circulation ♦ Through Ordinance amendments, encourage Element of the Edison Comprehensive co-location of wireless communication Master Plan for signal timing changes as facilities in order to reduce both the number well as new signal installation in of Use Variance requests and the number of conjunction with County and State plans. new wireless carrier structures. When new towers are constructed, every effort should ♦ Synchronize traffic signals throughout be made to camouflage the proposed Edison in order to facilitate traffic flow and structure. reduce pollution from stop and start traffic. ♦ Maintain and continually update a list of ♦ As industrial park development continues
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Edison (Metro New York), New Jersey Edison Where Opportunity Invents Itself
    EDISON (METRO NEW YORK), NEW JERSEY EDISON WHERE OPPORTUNITY INVENTS ITSELF Perhaps most famous for its namesake Thomas Edison, master of great American inventions, Edison, New Jersey is a thriving community that is consistently ranked as one of the top places to live. Menlo Park Mall is the premier shopping destination for the area. ‐ In the heart of suburban New Jersey, just 20 miles south of Manhattan, Edison is home to an upscale, auent population. ‐ The center predominantly serves Middlesex County, one of just ve counties in the country with over 1.5 million people and over $100,000 in average household income. ‐ Located within just a few miles of Rutgers University and the worldwide headquarters of Johnson & Johnson. ‐ The Thomas Edison Center at Menlo Park and the 36-acre Edison State Park and Trails are premier historical and state tourist attractions. THE BUSINESS OF BUSINESS Menlo Park Mall benets from its proximity to a host of nearby businesses. ‐ Key businesses including: - Johnson & Johnson headquarters - Merck & Co. headquarters - Bristol Myers Squibb - Wakefern Food Corporation headquarters - Hackensack Meridian Health - Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital - Bed Bath & Beyond - Corporate Amazon Distribution Center ‐ Raritan Center Business Park is conveniently located seven miles from Menlo Park Mall. With its daytime population of 45,000, it is the largest industrial park east of the Mississippi and home to the state’s largest privately owned convention facility, the New Jersey Convention and Expo Center. The highly visible shows held throughout the year draw thousands of attendees from across the state. ‐ New Brunswick, home to Rutgers University and 50,000 students, is less than a 10-minute drive from the mall.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Biennial RCRA Hazardous Waste Report (Based on 1997 Data)
    United States Solid Waste and EPA530-R-99-036d Environmental Protection Emergency Response PB99-166 852 Agency (5305W) September 1999 &EPA State Detail Analysis The National Biennial RCRA Hazardous Waste Report (Based on 1997 Data) ONI.Y CHARACTE:RISnc --'\"'- WASTES Printed on paper that contains at least 30 percent postconsumer fiber. This page intentionally left blank. NATIONAL BIENNIAL RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE REPORT: BASED ON 1997 DATA CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................. ES-1 ALABAMA ..................................................................1 ALASKA ...................................................................9 ARIZONA .................................................................17 ARKANSAS ...............................................................25 CALIFORNIA ..............................................................33 COLORADO ..............................................................41 CONNECTICUT ............................................................49 DELAWARE ...............................................................57 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ....................................................65 FLORIDA .................................................................71 GEORGIA .................................................................79 GUAM ....................................................................87 HAWAII ...................................................................93 IDAHO ..................................................................101
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2015-2016 NJTPA SUBREGIONAL STUDIES PROGRAM CR 529 Corridor Study Improve Transit Services & Bicycle and Pedestrian Access
    FY 2015-2016 NJTPA SUBREGIONAL STUDIES PROGRAM CR 529 Corridor Study Improve Transit Services & Bicycle and Pedestrian Access Second Steering Committee Meeting MINUTES – December 3, 2015 In Attendance Mr. Paul Larrousse, Chairman / National Transit Institute Ms. Heidi Heleniak, Dunellen Borough/ Downtown Management Organization Mr. Chris Mazauskas, Edison Township Mr. John Stewart, Plainfield City Mayor Brian Wahler, Piscataway Township Mr. Andras Holzmann, Somerset County Mr. Kenneth Wedeen, Somerset County Mr. Paul Onish, Senator Linda Greenstein Representative – 14th District Ms. Elizabeth Thompson, North Jersey Transportation Planning Authority (NJTPA) Ms. Blythe Eaman, North Jersey Transportation Planning Authority (NJTPA) Mr. Uzoma Anuke, New Jersey Department of Transportation Mr. Mike Viscardi, New Jersey Transit Ms. Leigh Ann Kimber, Rutgers University – Department of Transportation Services Ms. Liza Betz, Union County Mr. Mike Kruimer, East Coast Greenway Mr. George M. Ververides, Director of County Planning Ms. Carla Cefalo, Middlesex County Economic Development Mr. Val D’Aloia, Middlesex County, Engineering Staff Ms. Danielle Britton, Middlesex County Planning Staff Mr. Anthony Gambilonghi, Middlesex County Planning Staff Mr. Bruce McCracken, Middlesex County Planning Staff Ms. Kae Yamane, Middlesex County Planning Staff Mr. Ryan Rapp, Middlesex County Planning Staff Mr. Nick Turfaro, Middlesex County Planning Staff Total in Attendance – 25 Mr. Paul Larrousse began the meeting with a brief introduction and welcomed all who were in attendance. A brief synopsis of the two-year technical study in the region was discussed to identify ways to enhance transit services, bicycling and pedestrian improvements to the Route 529 Corridor study area. The North Jersey Transportation Planning Authority (NJTPA) has approved the study as part of the FY 2015-2016 Subregional Studies Program with a completion date no later than June 30, 2016 was also noted.
    [Show full text]
  • NEC One-Year Implementation Plan: FY17 Contents
    Northeast Corridor One-Year Implementation Plan Fiscal Year 2017 September 2016 Congress established the Northeast Corridor Commission to develop coordinated strategies for improving the Northeast’s core rail network in recognition of the inherent challenges of planning, financing, and implementing major infrastructure improvements that cross multiple jurisdictions. The expectation is that by coming together to take collective responsibility for the NEC, these disparate stakeholders will achieve a level of success that far exceeds the potential reach of any individual organization. The Commission is governed by a board comprised of one member from each of the NEC states (Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Maryland) and the District of Columbia; four members from Amtrak; and five members from the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). The Commission also includes non-voting representatives from four freight railroads, states with connecting corridors and several commuter operators in the Region. 2| NEC One-Year Implementation Plan: FY17 Contents Introduction 6 Funding Summary 8 Baseline Capital Charge Program 10 1 - Boston South Station 12 16 - Shore to Girard 42 2 - Boston to Providence 14 17 - Girard to Philadelphia 30th Street 44 3 - Providence to Wickford Junction 16 18 - Philadelphia 30th Street - Arsenal 46 4 - Wickford Junction to New London 18 19 - Arsenal to Marcus Hook 48 5 - New London to New Haven 20 20 - Marcus Hook to Bacon 50 6 - New Haven to State Line 22 21 - Bacon to Perryville 52 7 - State Line to New Rochelle 24 22 - Perryville to WAS 54 8 - New Rochelle to Harold Interlocking 26 23 - Washington Union Terminal 56 9 - Harold Interlocking to F Interlocking 28 24 - WAS to CP Virginia 58 10 - F Interlocking to PSNY 30 25 - Springfield to New Haven 60 11 - Penn Terminal 32 27 - Spuyten Duyvil to PSNY* 62 12 - PSNY to Trenton 34 28 - 30th St.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Edison Children
    Thomas Edison Children His father was Samuel Ogden Edison Jr. At the same time, he served as chaplain of Monmouth College, now Monmouth University, in West. At Edison Preparatory School, we provide a quality education experience with an emphasis on college and career readiness, every day, without exception. Great inventor and scientist, Edison shed light on the world. Engaging kids in STEM learning, Thomas Edison’s Secret Lab™, the exhibit offers unique, hands-on experiences that introduce STEM concepts, build enthusiasm for related education and careers, present engaging opportunities to actively participate in the scientific process, and highlight some of the greatest scientists and innovators from throughout history who have inspired us all with their ground-breaking discoveries. So many of Thomas Edison’s inventions are held in such high regard that he is considered the greatest inventor of all time. Children: Marion Estelle, Thomas Jr. menloparkmuseum. Thomas Edison Museum. They had traditional styling, so there was a feasible level of attractiveness to them. , and William Leslie by his first wife Mary Stillwell. 2 Generation Why 2 Powers and Abilities 2. Type : Soft, Washable, Food-Safe; especially for beginners who want to take food using chopsticks; Designed for all people, especially for beginners who want to take food using chopsticks with no difficulty. The Thomas Alva Edison Children's Room At the Harrison Public Library. 3) Hernando Cortez and the Conquest of Mexico. Souls of Angels: A Novel. Black History Month Printable Activities and Worksheets; Basic Houseparty App Tutorial; Valentine Cookie Decorating Ideas; 50 Free Virtual Tours of Unique and Famous Places.
    [Show full text]
  • This Field Service Action Expired on May 02, 2003
    This Field Service Action expired on May 02, 2003. OWNER NOTIFICATION Certain 1999 3.0L Ranger Trucks - Water Pump PROGRAM Replacement 99B15 July, 1999 To: All Ford and Lincoln Mercury Dealers Subject: Owner Notification Program 99B15 - Certain 1999 3.0L Ranger Trucks - Water Pump Replacement OASIS: Yes OWNER LIST: Yes PARTS RETURN: No PROGRAM TERMS: This program will be in effect until April 30, 2000, regardless of mileage (After this program expires, the vehicle may still be eligible for this service under any remaining vehicle warranty coverage) AFFECTED VEHICLES Certain 1999 3.0L Ranger Trucks built at the Twin Cities Assembly Plant, Louisville Assembly Plant and the Edison Assembly Plant from March 8, 1999 through April 12, 1999. REASON FOR RECALL The affected trucks were built with water pumps that may have excessive axial runout of the water pump hub threads. This could result in water pump failure and possible engine overheating. SERVICE ACTION To correct this condition owners of the affected vehicles will be advised to return their Ranger to the dealer to have a new water pump and gasket installed at no cost to the owner. QUESTIONS? Claims Information 1-800-423-8851 Other Recall Questions 1-800-325-5621 Attachments z Attachment I { Administrative Information { Refund Codes z Attachment II { Labor Allowances { Parts Ordering Information z Attachment III { Technical Information ATTACHMENT I Owner Notification Program 99B15 Certain 1999 3.0L Ranger Trucks - Water Pump Replacement OASIS You must use OASIS to determine if a vehicle is eligible for this recall. PLEASE NOTE Correct all vehicles in stock before delivery.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Auto Project Progress Report - December 2000 I Inaugural Progress Report Michigan Automotive Pollution Prevention Project
    A VOLUNTARY POLLUTION PREVENTION AND RESOURCE CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP ADMINISTERED BY: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Environmental Assistance Division DECEMBER, 2000: 1st ISSUE John Engler, Governor • Russell J. Harding, Director www.deq.state.mi.us ACKNOWLEDGMENTS DaimlerChrysler Corporation, Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation and the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) thank the Auto Project Stakeholder Group members for providing advice to the Auto Project partners and facilitating public information exchange. The Auto Companies and MDEQ also acknowledge the guidance and counsel provided by the US EPA Region V. CONTACTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION For information regarding the Michigan Automotive Pollution Prevention Project Progress Report, contact DaimlerChrysler, Ford, or General Motors at the addresses listed below or the Environmental Assistance Division of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality at 1-800-662-9278. DaimlerChrysler Ford Doug Orf, CIMS 482-00-51 Sue Rokosz DaimlerChrysler Corporation Ford Motor Company 800 Chrysler Drive One Parklane Blvd., Suite 1400 Auburn Hills, MI 48326-2757 Dearborn, MI 48126 [email protected] [email protected] General Motors MDEQ Sandra Brewer, 482-303-300 Anita Singh Welch General Motors Corporation Environmental Assistance Division 465 W. Milwaukee Ave. Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Detroit, MI 48202 P.O. Box 30457 [email protected] Lansing, MI 48909 [email protected] Michigan Auto Project Progress Report - December 2000 i Inaugural Progress Report Michigan Automotive Pollution Prevention Project TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Foreward iv I. Executive Summary Project Overview 1 Activities and Accomplishments 4 Focus on Michigan 11 Auto Company Profiles II. DaimlerChrysler Corporation Project Status 12 Activities and Accomplishments 14 Focus on Michigan 16 III.
    [Show full text]
  • Visions of Electric Media Electric of Visions
    TELEVISUAL CULTURE Roberts Visions of Electric Media Ivy Roberts Visions of Electric Media Television in the Victorian and Machine Ages Visions of Electric Media Televisual Culture Televisual culture encompasses and crosses all aspects of television – past, current and future – from its experiential dimensions to its aesthetic strategies, from its technological developments to its crossmedial extensions. The ‘televisual’ names a condition of transformation that is altering the coordinates through which we understand, theorize, intervene, and challenge contemporary media culture. Shifts in production practices, consumption circuits, technologies of distribution and access, and the aesthetic qualities of televisual texts foreground the dynamic place of television in the contemporary media landscape. They demand that we revisit concepts such as liveness, media event, audiences and broadcasting, but also that we theorize new concepts to meet the rapidly changing conditions of the televisual. The series aims at seriously analyzing both the contemporary specificity of the televisual and the challenges uncovered by new developments in technology and theory in an age in which digitization and convergence are redrawing the boundaries of media. Series editors Sudeep Dasgupta, Joke Hermes, Misha Kavka, Jaap Kooijman, Markus Stauff Visions of Electric Media Television in the Victorian and Machine Ages Ivy Roberts Amsterdam University Press Cover illustration: ‘Professor Goaheadison’s Latest,’ Fun, 3 July 1889, 6. Cover design: Coördesign, Leiden
    [Show full text]
  • The New Jersey Cultural Trust Two Hundred Fifty Qualified
    The New Jersey Cultural Trust Two Hundred Fifty Qualified Organizations as of May 18, 2021 Atlantic County Absecon Lighthouse Atlantic City, New Jersey Preserve, interpret and operate Absecon Lighthouse site. Educate the public of its rich history and advocate the successful development of the Lighthouse District located in the South Inlet section of Atlantic City. Atlantic City Arts Foundation Atlantic City, New Jersey The mission of the Atlantic City Arts Foundation is to foster an environment in which diverse arts and culture programs can succeed and enrich the quality of life for residents of and visitors to Atlantic City. Atlantic City Ballet Atlantic City, New Jersey The Atlantic City Ballet is a 501 (c) (3) not-for-profit organization dedicated to bringing the highest quality classical and contemporary dance to audiences of all ages and cultures, with a primary focus on audiences in Southern New Jersey and the surrounding region. AC Ballet programs promote this mission through access to fully-staged performances by a skilled resident company of professional dancers, educational programs suitable for all skill and interest levels, and community outreach initiatives to encourage appreciation of and participation in the art form. Atlantic County Historical Society Somers Point, New Jersey The mission of the Atlantic County Historical Society is to collect and preserve historical materials exemplifying the events, places, and lifestyles of the people of Atlantic County and southern New Jersey, to encourage the study of history and genealogy, and disseminate historical and genealogical information to its members and the general public. Bay Atlantic Symphony Atlantic City, New Jersey The Bay Atlantic Symphony shares and develops love and appreciation for live concert music in the southern New Jersey community through performance and education.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment, Kin Buc Landfill Operable Unit II, Edison
    SDMS Document 56333 OJ n o o CDM FEDERAL PROGRAMS CORPORATION fv .fc. o o # FINAL RISK ASSESSMENT PART II - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT KIN BUG LANDFILL OPERABLE UNIT II EDISON, NEU JERSEY 0 Prepared for U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Office of Waste Programs Enforcement Washington, D.C. 20A60 EPA Work. Assignment No. C02004 EPA Region II Site No. 2P0A Contract No. 68-W9-0002 CDM Federal Programs Corporation Document No. TESV-C02004-FR-CJZL Prepared By CDM FPC CD Work Assignment Project Manager Jeanne Litwin Telephone Number (212) 393-9634 o o EPA Work Assignment Manager Alison Barry o Telephone Number (212) 264-8678 Date Prepared February 27, 1992 o I ABLr E OF CONTENTS ! .0 introGuction . ; \ 1.1 Objectives and Scope 2 1.1.1 Objectives of the Environmental Assessment . 2 1.1.2 Scope of the Environmental Assessment- 2 1.2 Site Description •. 2 1.2.1 Description of the Ecosystems and Habitats that may be Impacted 2 1.2.2 Division of Site for Analysis of Contaminant Pathways and Effects 2 1.3 Identification of Chemicals of Potential Concern 4 1.3.1 Calculation of Summary Statistics 4 1.3.2 Compansons with Background Locations 7 1.3.3 Chemicals in Surface Water ; . 7 1.3.4 Chemicals in Sediments 10 1.3.5 Biota . /. 25 2.0 Environmental Exposure 30 2.1 Potential Ecological Receptors 30 2.1.1 Aquatic Biota 30 2.1.2 Plants . 30 2.1.3 Birds 31 2.1.4 Mammals 31 2.1.5 Identification of Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Species 31 2.2 Exposure Assessment 31 2.2.1 Pathways for Exposure of Aquatic Biota 36 2.2.2 Pathways for Exposure of Wetland Species 36 3.0 Toxicity Assessment 43 3.1 Methods for Assessing Toxicity and Risks of Contaminants to Aquatic Species 43 3.1.1 Surface Water Exposure 43 3.1.2 Sediment Exposure .
    [Show full text]
  • NJDOT Bureau of Research
    FHWA-NJ-2017-013 Analysis of Local Bus Markets FINAL REPORT VOLUME I – Methodology and Findings July 2017 Submitted by Devajyoti Deka, Ph.D. Assistant Director for Research Alan M. Voorhees Transportation Center NJDOT Research Project Manager Priscilla Ukpah In cooperation with New Jersey Department of Transportation Bureau of Research and U. S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration DISCLAIMER STATEMENT “The contents of this report reflect the views of the author who is responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the New Jersey Department of Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.” TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE 1. Report No. 2.Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-NJ-2017-013-1 4.Title and Subtitle 5.Report Date Analysis of Local Bus Markets July 2017 FINAL REPORT 6. Performing Organization Code Volume I - Methodology and Findings 7.Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Deka, Devajyoti 9.Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Center for Advanced Infrastructure and Transportation Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey 11. Contract or Grant No. 100 Brett Road Piscataway, NJ 08854-8058 12.Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13.Type of Report and Period Covered New Jersey Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Final Report 1035 Parkway Avenue 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Trenton, NJ 08625-0600 Washington, D.C. 20590 14.Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes 16.Abstract Despite having an extensive network of public transit, traffic congestion and transportation-related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are significant concerns in New Jersey.
    [Show full text]
  • Warranty and Policy Manual
    Ford Motor Vehicle Assurance Company Warranty and Policy Manual EDITION: October 2003 Form No. FCS-7755 Warranty & Policy Manual Table of Contents Introduction Page Number Section 1 – Dealership Administration • Responsibility Overview 1-1 • Dealer & Service Supervision Responsibilities 1-7 • Warranty Record Responsibilities 1-10 • Warranty Parts Retention & Return Procedures & Responsibilities 1-17 • Service Technician Specialty Training Standards — ACES II Edits 1-25 • Sublet Invoice Requirements 1-28 Section 2 – Carrier Drop-Off through Delivery to Customer • Carrier Drop-Off Inspection 2-1 • In-Transit Damage/Loss and Damage Repairs 2-12 • Misbuilt/Misinvoiced Vehicles 2-20 • Storage of New Vehicles 2-23 • Pre-delivery/Delivery to Customer 2-25 Section 3 – Warranty Coverages • Coverage Summary/Introduction 3-1 • Ford, Lincoln, Mercury, and TH!NK Car & Light Truck Coverage 3-7 • 600 & Higher Series Truck Coverage 3-53 • Federal Emissions Coverage 3-81 • California Emissions Coverage 3-85 • Battery Coverage 3-93 • Service Part Warranty Coverage 3-109 • Warranty Cancellation - Branded Title 3-127 • Service Contracts (ESP Plans, Superseal, etc.) 3-130 • Ford Remanufactured Parts Coverage/Usage Requirements 3-139 • Governmental Coverage Regulations & Legal Procedures (lemon law, RAV, taxes) 3-141 Section 4 – Recalls, Dealer Self-Approval Guidelines, & After-Warranty Assistance • Safety, Compliance and Emissions Recalls 4-1 • Dealer Self-Approval Guidelines 4-6 • After-Warranty Assistance 4-10 October 2003 Ford Motor Company – Ford Motor
    [Show full text]