DOCSLIB.ORG

Ford Motor Company VIN Equipment Codes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ford Motor Company VIN Equipment Codes Report Abuse « Search: The Web Angelfire Previous | Top 100 | Next » share: del.icio.us | digg | reddit | furl | Ford Excursion+Vin facebook Ads by Google Check Any Vehicle VIN 2010 Ford Official Site Car Search By VIN Number Disc Makers CD Services Vehicle Record Check. Get Unbiased Visit the Official Ford Site Now for the Info You Need At Recession-Proof 1000 CDs in Digipaks now $990! Automotive Information Latest Ford vehicle Info. Prices. Get More, Spend Less! Lowest price, highest quality. www.edmunds.com www.FordVehicles.com www.AutoCheck.com www.discmakers.com/DigipakSale Ford Motor Company VIN Equipment Codes Last updated September 7th, 2005 4th digit 5th digit - line 6th digit - series passenger cars - restraints A minivan trucks active belts plus driver and A20 - Mercury Mountaineer 0 150 series Flareside B A5 - Windstar & Freestar passenger air bags 150 series Styleside & E-Series chassis 1 active belts plus driver and C Econoline F Econoline chassis passenger air bags E-Series cargo van 2 250 series E active belts plus driver and Econoline cargo van 3 350 series H passenger side air bags, F F-series pick-up, regular cab 4 Super Duty series curtains, or canopies M Lincoln & Mercury cars active belts plus driver and K M5 - Mercury Sable sport-utility vehicles passenger air bags M6 - Mercury Mystique M7 - Mercury Grand Marquis & 2 2-door Explorer Mercury Marauder 3 4-door Explorer trucks - Gross Vehicle M81 - Lincoln Town Car Weight Rating (GVWR) M83 - Lincoln Town Car 5 4-door Mountaineer M84 - Lincoln Town Car A 0-3,000 lbs. M85 - Lincoln Town Car B 3,001-4,000 lbs. M86 - Lincoln LS M87 - Lincoln LS C 4,001-5,000 lbs. M89 - Lincoln Town Car D 5,001-6,000 lbs. M9 - Lincoln Continental E 6,001-7,000 lbs. P Ford cars P1 - Ford Escort F 7,001-8,000 lbs. P3 - Ford Focus P4 - Ford Mustang G 8,001-8,500 lbs. P5 - Ford Taurus H 8,501-9,000 lbs. P6 - Ford Thunderbird P66 - Ford Contour J 9,001-10,000 lbs. P68 - Ford Contour K 10,001-14,000 lbs. P7 - Ford Crown Victoria P9 - Ford GT L 14,001-16,000 lbs. M 16,001-19,500 lbs. R 6,001-7,000 lbs. R Ranger pick-up R0 - Ranger 7th digit - body type/drive R10 - Ranger standard cab 4x2 R11 - Ranger standard cab 4x4 trucks R14 - Ranger 2-door SuperCab 4x2 0 Econoline RV cutaway R15 - Ranger 2-door SuperCab 4x4 R18 - Ranger 4-door SuperCab 4x2 Econoline Club Wagon 1 R19 - Ranger 4-door SuperCab 4x4 passenger van R4 - Ranger 4 Econoline cargo van S Econoline passenger van Econoline commercial T Mercury cars 7 cutaway T6 - Mercury Cougar F-series 4x2 U Sport-Utility Vehicles U0 - Ford Escape 8 F-series 4x4 U1 - Ford Expedition 9 Econoline commercial basic U2 - Lincoln Navigator U4 - Ford Excursion U6 - Ford Explorer sport-utility vehicles U7 - Mercury Mountaineer U8 - Lincoln Aviator 2 Explorer/Mountaineer 4x2 U9 - Ford Escape 4 Explorer/Mountaineer 4x4 V Mercury minivan 5 Explorer/Mountaineer AWD V1 - Mercury Villager W F-series Crew pick-up X F-series SuperCab pick-up 8th digit - engine 11th digit - assembly plant passenger cars commercial trucks Hapeville, A Atlanta Assembly V-8 3.9L DOHC “AJ-V8” Caterpillar diesel Georgia A (Lincoln LS) A I-6 7.2L (3126B) Oakville, B Oakville Assembly G V-6 DOHC SVT C I-6 Ontario V-8 5.4L EFI 4V “Modular” H I-6 7.2L (3126B) Oakville, H C Ontario Truck (Mustang Cobra R) N I-6 7.2L (3126B) Ontario Avon Lake, V-6 2.5L DOHC “Duratec P I-6 D Ohio Assembly L Ohio 25” R I-6 7.2L (3126B) V-8 3.4L EFI DOHC Louisville, Kentucky Truck N R I-6 E Assembly “Yamaha” (Taurus SHO) Kentucky S I-6 P I-4 2.0L SPIEFI “Zetec” Dearborn, T I-6 F Dearborn Truck V-8 DOHC Ram Air Michigan R U I-6 Chicago, (Mustang Mach 1) G Chicago Assembly V-6 3.0L DOHC “Duratec W I-6 Illinois S 30” X I-6 H Lorain, Ohio Lorain Assembly V-8 DOHC SC (Ford GT) 1 I-6 Monterrey, IMMSA Mexico U V-6 3.0L EFI “Vulcan” 2 I-6 7.2L (3126B) J Aurskog, V V-8 DOHC (Marauder) 3 I-6 TH!NK Nordic AS Norway W V-8 4.6L SOHC “Modular” 4 I-6 X V-8 SOHC (Mustang GT) 5 I-6 Claycomo, Kansas City K Assembly V-8 DOHC SC (Mustang 6 I-6 Missouri Y Cobra) Wayne, 7 I-6 7.2L (3126B) L Michigan Truck I-4 2.3L DOHC PZEV Michigan Z 8 I-6 “Duratec 23” Cuautitlan, 9 I-6 M Cuautitlan Assembly Mexico 2 V-6 4.2L EFI-FFV Cummins diesel Norfolk, 3 I-4 DOHC A I-6 5.9L N Norfolk Assembly Virginia 4 V-6 3.8L EFI “Essex” B I-6 5.9L St. Paul, I-4 2.0L DOHC HP “Duratec P Twin Cities 5 D I-6 5.9L Minnesota Assembly ST” (Focus ZX3 SVT) E I-6 5.9L Hermosillo, Hermosillo 6 V-6 3.9L EFI R Stamping & F I-6 5.9L Mexico Assembly 9 V-8 SOHC (CNG) G I-6 5.9L Allen Park, S Allen Park Assembly H I-6 5.9L Michigan light trucks V I-6 5.9L Edison, T Edison Assembly I-4 2.3L EFI New Jersey A V-8 5.4L DOHC (Windsor Y I-6 (B5.9E) Louisville, plant) “Intech” 1 I-6 (ISB) U Louisville Assembly Kentucky Plant I-4 2.0L “Zetech” 3 I-6 (ISB) B Escobedo, I-4 2.5L OHV-DI (diesel) 4 I-6 (ISB) V Blue Diamond Truck Mexico C I-4 2.5L EFI-SOHC 8 I-6 (B5.9E) Wayne, Ford W Wayne Stamping & D I-4 2.3L EFI “Duratech 23” Michigan Assembly E V-6 4.0L EFI-SOHC B V-10 bi-fuel NGV/LPG Talbotville, St. Thomas V-8 7.3L “Navistar” Turbo- F V-8 turbo diesel X Assembly F Ontario Diesel L V-8 5.4L gasoline Wixom, Y Wixom Assembly H V-8 DOHC S V-10 6.8L gasoline Michigan K V-6 4.0L SOHC Z V-10 gasoline-GFP Hazlewood, Z St. Louis Assembly V-8 5.4L EFI-SOHC International /Navistar diesel Missouri L “Triton” J V-8 6.0L (INT) Detroit, 0 Detroit M V-8 5.4L SOHC (CNG) K V-8 6.0L (INT) Michigan Empowerment Zone N V-8 5.0L L V-8 6.0L (INT) Flat Rock, AutoAlliance 5 International V-8 5.0L EFI M V-8 6.0L (INT) Michigan P V-8 6.0L EFI “Navistar Y V-8 6.0L (INT) Powerstroke” (diesel) Z V-8 6.0L (INT) R V-8 DOHC 0 V-8 6.0L (INT) S V-10 6.8L EFI-SOHC 5 V-8 7.3L (NAV) V-6 3.3L EFI-SOHC 6 V-8 7.3L (NAV) T “Nissan VG” (Mercury Villager) U V-6 3.0L EFI “Vulcan” V-8 4.6L EFI-SOHC W 12th digit - division (Windsor plant) A to E Ford X V-6 4.0L EFI-OHV J & L Lincoln-Mercury V-8 5.4L SOHC (gaseous Z fuel prep) V-6 3.0L DOHC “Duratech 1 30” 2 V-6 4.2L EFI-OHV 3 V-8 SOHC 4 V-6 3.6L EFI “Essex” 5 V-8 SOHC(E) V-6 3.9L EFI 6 V-8 4.6L EFI-SOHC (Windsor plant) “Triton” Some information from Wikipedia List of Ford VIN codes and Wikipedia List of Ford factories. back Audi Blue Bird BMW Bova Checker Chrysler DAF PT Cruiser Chevrolet & GMC pickups GM General Ferrari Ford Motors Honda Harley- cars motorcycles Davidson Dodge Flyer General Trucks Motors buses Jeep Land M · A · N Mercedes NABI Nova Bus Rover & American Benz Range buses Motor Orion Rover Coach Industries Renault Subaru Transportation Toyota Van Hool Volkswagen Volvo Manufacturing Prevost Corporation Introduction WMI VDS Check VIS World Vehicle Digit Vehicle Manufacturer's Description Identification Identification Section Section Canadian Flyer General Mack Motor Nova Orion Prevost Rek Vee Twin Car & Motors Trucks Coach Bus Car Industries Coach Foundry Industries Corp. Manufacturers Transit Coach Railways Operators Operators Home Photos Rosters Destination Routes Search Site Links Signs Site History Feedback www.discmakers.com/RadioAirplay Ads by Google Site Sponsors .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ford Recalls 4.5 Million Additional Vehicles in Switch Recall Faulty Part Could Cause Fire; Largest Recall in Ford’S History
    NYS Department of State safetyOFPC ALERT October NY STATE FIRE 2009 Ford Recalls 4.5 Million Additional Vehicles In Switch Recall Faulty Part Could Cause Fire; Largest Recall In Ford’s History Ford Motor Co. says it will add 4.5 million older-model vehicles to the list of those recalled because a defective cruise control switch could cause a fire. Ford says 1.1 million Ford Windstar minivans will be recalled for repairs due to a small risk of fires. The company says another 3.4 million Ford, Lincoln and Mercury vehicles with the same switches also will be recalled even though there have been no reports of fires. Those vehicles mainly are trucks and SUVs. All vehicles covered by the recall are from the 1992 to 2003 model years. This is Ford’s seventh recall due to the Texas Instruments speed control switches. The recalls cover a total of 14.3 million vehicles and combined are the largest in Ford’s history Summary of the Ford Fire Recalls Both the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and Ford Motor Co. have issued several recalls of millions of Ford, Lincoln and Mercury vehicles as a result of a defective cruise control switch that can lead to a spontaneous fire, even when the vehicle is turned off, parked and unattended. The most recent of this Ford cruise control recalls occurred on September 9, 2008, when the National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration re-recalled millions of Ford, Lincoln and Mercury SUV’s pickup trucks, vans and cars. This advisory was the second recall warning from the safety agency issued in 2008 and is meant to bring in nearly 5 million cars, trucks and SUVs which still have not been brought in for repair since an earlier recall of 12 million vehicles in February 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Applications Ford Crown Victoria Police Interceptor V8 4.6L Lincoln
    TECHNICAL SUPPORT 888-910-8888 F42E SIZE US GALLON 18-1/4 x 42-1/2 x 19 9-1/4 LITER KIT 72 LO57 (Included) COMMENTS Police Interceptor Applications Ford Crown Victoria Police Interceptor V8 4.6L YEAR FUEL FUEL DELIVERY ASP. ENG. VIN ENG. DESG 2011 FLEX FI N V - 2011 GAS FI N W - 2010 FLEX FI N V - 2010 GAS FI N W - 2009 FLEX FI N V - 2009 GAS FI N W - 2008 FLEX FI N V - 2008 GAS FI N W - 2007 GAS FI N W - 2006 GAS FI N W - 2005 GAS FI N W - 2004 GAS FI N W - 2003 GAS FI N W - 2002 GAS FI N W - 2001 GAS FI N W - Lincoln Town Car Cartier V8 4.6L YEAR FUEL FUEL DELIVERY ASP. ENG. VIN ENG. DESG 2003 GAS FI N W - 2002 GAS FI N W - 2001 GAS FI N W - Lincoln Town Car Cartier L V8 4.6L YEAR FUEL FUEL DELIVERY ASP. ENG. VIN ENG. DESG 2003 GAS FI N W - 2002 GAS FI N W - 2001 GAS FI N W - Lincoln Town Car Designer V8 4.6L YEAR FUEL FUEL DELIVERY ASP. ENG. VIN ENG. DESG 2007 GAS FI N W - Lincoln Town Car Designer Series V8 4.6L YEAR FUEL FUEL DELIVERY ASP. ENG. VIN ENG. DESG 2007 FLEX FI N V - 2007 GAS FI N W - 2006 FLEX FI N V - 2006 GAS FI N W - Lincoln Town Car Executive V8 4.6L YEAR FUEL FUEL DELIVERY ASP. ENG. VIN ENG. DESG 2011 FLEX FI N V - 2010 FLEX FI N V - 2009 FLEX FI N V - 2009 GAS FI N W - 2008 FLEX FI N V - 2008 GAS FI N W - 2007 FLEX FI N V - 2007 GAS FI N W - 2006 FLEX FI N V - 2006 GAS FI N W - 2005 GAS FI N W - 2004 GAS FI N W - 2003 GAS FI N W - 2002 GAS FI N W - 2001 GAS FI N W - Lincoln Town Car Executive L V8 4.6L YEAR FUEL FUEL DELIVERY ASP.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Biennial RCRA Hazardous Waste Report (Based on 1997 Data)
    United States Solid Waste and EPA530-R-99-036d Environmental Protection Emergency Response PB99-166 852 Agency (5305W) September 1999 &EPA State Detail Analysis The National Biennial RCRA Hazardous Waste Report (Based on 1997 Data) ONI.Y CHARACTE:RISnc --'\"'- WASTES Printed on paper that contains at least 30 percent postconsumer fiber. This page intentionally left blank. NATIONAL BIENNIAL RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE REPORT: BASED ON 1997 DATA CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................. ES-1 ALABAMA ..................................................................1 ALASKA ...................................................................9 ARIZONA .................................................................17 ARKANSAS ...............................................................25 CALIFORNIA ..............................................................33 COLORADO ..............................................................41 CONNECTICUT ............................................................49 DELAWARE ...............................................................57 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ....................................................65 FLORIDA .................................................................71 GEORGIA .................................................................79 GUAM ....................................................................87 HAWAII ...................................................................93 IDAHO ..................................................................101
    [Show full text]
  • Vehicle Size and Fatality Risk in Model Year 1985-93 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks
    U.S. Department of Transportation http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov National Highway Traffic Safety Administration DOT HS 808 570 January 1997 NHTSA Technical Report Relationships between Vehicle Size and Fatality Risk in Model Year 1985-93 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks This document is available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear only because they are considered essential to the object of this report. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Go ,i on No. 3, Recipient's Catalog No. DOT HS 808 570 4. Title ond Subtitle 5. Report Dote January 1997 Relationships Between Vehicle Size and Fatality Risk 6. Performing Organization Code in Model Year 1985-93 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks 8. Performing Organization Report No 7. Author's) Charles J. Kahane, Ph.D. 9. Performing Organization Name ond Address 10. Wort Unit No. (TRAIS) Evaluation Division, Plans and Policy National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 11. Conrroct or Grant No. Washington, D.C. 20590 13. Type of Report and Period Cohered 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Department of Transportation NHTSA Technical Report National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, D.C. 20590 15. Supplementary. Notes NHTSA Reports DOT HS 808 569 through DOT HS 808 575 address vehicle size and safety. 16. Abstract Fatality rates per million exposure years are computed by make, model and model year, based on the crash experience of model year 1985-93 passenger cars and light trucks (pickups, vans and sport utility vehicles) in the United States during calendar years 1989-93.
    [Show full text]
  • Provider List Contents
    Provider List Contents Provider Rating Only Supports eSignatures AFAS ......................................................................Yes ...................... 1 Allstate ..................................................................Yes ...................... 2 Allstate GAP ..............................................................Yes ...................... 3 Ally (APP Products) .......................................................Yes ...................... 4 Alpha Warranty Services ...................................................Yes ...................... 5 American Auto Guardian ....................................................Yes ...................... 6 American Guardian Warranty Services (AGW ..................................Yes ...................... 7 APPI ................................................................................................ 8 ArmorAll ............................................................................................ 9 ASC Warranty ....................................................................................... 10 ASI Profits ........................................................................................ 11 AssurancePlus ...................................................................................... 12 Audi Financial Services ............................................................................ 13 AUL ................................................................................................ 14 AutoXcel ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Second Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement
    Case 3:17-cv-03201-N Document 79 Filed 11/17/16 Page 1 of 44 PageID 3978 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Case No. 2:15-CV-10394-LJM-SDD Plaintiff, HON. LAURIE J. MICHELSON v. NEW WORLD INTERNATIONAL JURY TRIAL DEMANDED INC., AUTO LIGHTHOUSE PLUS, LLC, and UNITED COMMERCE CENTERS, INC. Defendants. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Case 3:17-cv-03201-N Document 79 Filed 11/17/16 Page 2 of 44 PageID 3979 Plaintiff Ford Global Technologies, LLC (“FGTL”) by and through their undersigned counsel, as and for its Complaint against defendants United Commerce Centers, Inc., New World International Inc., and Auto Lighthouse Plus, LLC (collectively, “Defendants”) alleges as follows: I. THE PARTIES 1. Ford Global Technologies LLC (hereinafter “FGTL”) is a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of the State of Michigan, having a principal place of business at 330 Townsend Drive, Suite 800 South, Dearborn, MI 48126. 2. On information and belief, Defendant United Commerce Centers, Inc. (hereinafter “UCC”) is a Texas Corporation, with a principal place of business at 1720 E. State Highway 356, Irving, TX 75060. 3. On information and belief, UCC is doing business as New World International. 4. On information and belief, Peter Tsai is registered agent, president and treasurer of UCC and Grace Tsai is Director, Vice President and Secretary of UCC. 1 Case 3:17-cv-03201-N Document 79 Filed 11/17/16 Page 3 of 44 PageID 3980 5. On information and belief, Defendant New World International Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • This Field Service Action Expired on May 02, 2003
    This Field Service Action expired on May 02, 2003. OWNER NOTIFICATION Certain 1999 3.0L Ranger Trucks - Water Pump PROGRAM Replacement 99B15 July, 1999 To: All Ford and Lincoln Mercury Dealers Subject: Owner Notification Program 99B15 - Certain 1999 3.0L Ranger Trucks - Water Pump Replacement OASIS: Yes OWNER LIST: Yes PARTS RETURN: No PROGRAM TERMS: This program will be in effect until April 30, 2000, regardless of mileage (After this program expires, the vehicle may still be eligible for this service under any remaining vehicle warranty coverage) AFFECTED VEHICLES Certain 1999 3.0L Ranger Trucks built at the Twin Cities Assembly Plant, Louisville Assembly Plant and the Edison Assembly Plant from March 8, 1999 through April 12, 1999. REASON FOR RECALL The affected trucks were built with water pumps that may have excessive axial runout of the water pump hub threads. This could result in water pump failure and possible engine overheating. SERVICE ACTION To correct this condition owners of the affected vehicles will be advised to return their Ranger to the dealer to have a new water pump and gasket installed at no cost to the owner. QUESTIONS? Claims Information 1-800-423-8851 Other Recall Questions 1-800-325-5621 Attachments z Attachment I { Administrative Information { Refund Codes z Attachment II { Labor Allowances { Parts Ordering Information z Attachment III { Technical Information ATTACHMENT I Owner Notification Program 99B15 Certain 1999 3.0L Ranger Trucks - Water Pump Replacement OASIS You must use OASIS to determine if a vehicle is eligible for this recall. PLEASE NOTE Correct all vehicles in stock before delivery.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Auto Project Progress Report - December 2000 I Inaugural Progress Report Michigan Automotive Pollution Prevention Project
    A VOLUNTARY POLLUTION PREVENTION AND RESOURCE CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP ADMINISTERED BY: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Environmental Assistance Division DECEMBER, 2000: 1st ISSUE John Engler, Governor • Russell J. Harding, Director www.deq.state.mi.us ACKNOWLEDGMENTS DaimlerChrysler Corporation, Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation and the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) thank the Auto Project Stakeholder Group members for providing advice to the Auto Project partners and facilitating public information exchange. The Auto Companies and MDEQ also acknowledge the guidance and counsel provided by the US EPA Region V. CONTACTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION For information regarding the Michigan Automotive Pollution Prevention Project Progress Report, contact DaimlerChrysler, Ford, or General Motors at the addresses listed below or the Environmental Assistance Division of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality at 1-800-662-9278. DaimlerChrysler Ford Doug Orf, CIMS 482-00-51 Sue Rokosz DaimlerChrysler Corporation Ford Motor Company 800 Chrysler Drive One Parklane Blvd., Suite 1400 Auburn Hills, MI 48326-2757 Dearborn, MI 48126 [email protected] [email protected] General Motors MDEQ Sandra Brewer, 482-303-300 Anita Singh Welch General Motors Corporation Environmental Assistance Division 465 W. Milwaukee Ave. Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Detroit, MI 48202 P.O. Box 30457 [email protected] Lansing, MI 48909 [email protected] Michigan Auto Project Progress Report - December 2000 i Inaugural Progress Report Michigan Automotive Pollution Prevention Project TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Foreward iv I. Executive Summary Project Overview 1 Activities and Accomplishments 4 Focus on Michigan 11 Auto Company Profiles II. DaimlerChrysler Corporation Project Status 12 Activities and Accomplishments 14 Focus on Michigan 16 III.
    [Show full text]
  • NWI Times – Real Life STEM Support
    Case separation Judge grants request to split up attempted Striving for rape, voyeurism charges, LOCAL, PAGE A3 greatness Delivering vaccines Carrothers named Times POY, SPORTS, PAGE C1 Homebound Hoosiers aided, LOCAL, PAGE A3 BREEZY WITH SOME RAIN 58 • 43 FORECAST, A4 | SATURDAY, APRIL 10, 2021 | nwi.com Ford idling Region plant Workers to be laid tered for the week along with Lear, for instance, makes seats continue building high-quality tems. Ford’s Flat Rock Assembly Plant, for the Ford Explorer, Lincoln Avi- vehicles that continue to be in Ford already had to reduce op- o for a week amid Dearborn Truck Plant and Lou- ator and Police Interceptor Util- high demand among our dealers erations to one shift for a week isville Assembly Plant. Ford also ity that are manufactured at the and customers. One of those solu- at the Chicago Assembly Plant global parts shortage plans to shut down the transit side Chicago Assembly Plant. They are tions is sequencing down weeks, earlier this year. The Alliance for of the Kansas City Assembly Plant delivered with no inventories built allowing us to keep building our Automotive Innovation estimates JOSEPH S. PETE and operate the Ohio Assembly up so the supplier’s operations are must-have vehicles for custom- the auto industry in America [email protected], 219-933-3316 Plant at a reduced level because synced with Ford’s. ers when we have adequate parts could end up producing 1 million Ford plans to temporarily shut of parts shortfalls. “The global shortage is a ect- suppliers.” fewer cars this year as a result of down the Chicago Assembly Plant The shutdown will a ect ing all automotive manufacturers The global semiconductor the parts shortages.
    [Show full text]
  • Cleveland All Stars Homecoming Car Show of Cleveland and Northeast Ohio Built Vehicles
    Cleveland All Stars Homecoming Car Show of Cleveland and Northeast Ohio Built Vehicles June 23 – 25, 2017 APPLICATION FOR PARTICIPATION Presented by the Crawford Auto-Aviation Museum of the Western Reserve Historical Society Show LocationLocation: Cleveland History Center | 10825 East Boulevard, Cleveland, OH 44106 Please seeseesee reverse side forforfor aaa full listlistlist ofofof accepted vehicles. *If applying with a coach-built vehicle from Cleveland/Northern Ohio, please supply evidence of your vehicle’s Cleveland/Northern Ohio provenance if it is not a Northern Ohio marque. Please include a photo of the coachbuilder’s tag or other documentation related to the regional production. All applications will be reviewed by the Cleveland All Stars Homecoming Car Show committee and final acceptance of vehicles will be determined by the committee. Vehicle year: _______________________ Make, Model, and Body Style: ______________________________________ Has this vehicle been modified from new in anyway? [ ] YES [ ] NO If yes, please explain: _______________________________________________________________________________ Name of Owner: ____________________________________ Address: _______________________________________ City: ________________________________________ State: _____________________ Zip Code: _________________ Home/Cell Phone: _____________________________Email Address: ________________________________________ Insurance carrier and policy number: ___________________________________________________________________ Will be trailering
    [Show full text]
  • Ford Media Center Ford Media Center FORD MOTOR COMPANY ISSUES FOUR SAFETY RECALLS in NORTH AMERICA
    8/30/2019 Ford Motor Company Issues Four Safety Recalls in North America | Ford Media Center Ford Media Center FORD MOTOR COMPANY ISSUES FOUR SAFETY RECALLS IN NORTH AMERICA Aug 30, 2019 | DEARBORN, Mich. DEARBORN, Mich., Aug. 30, 2019 – Ford Motor Company is issuing four safety recalls in North America. Ford is not aware of any accidents or injuries associated with any of these conditions. Safety recall of select vehicles for potential lack of seat restraint in the event of a crash Ford is issuing a safety recall for: 1. Certain 2018-20 Ford F-150, 2019-20 Ford F-Series Super Duty, 2018-19 Ford Explorer and 2019-20 Ford Expedition vehicles with a manual driver and/or front passenger seat-back recliner mechanism, and 2. Certain 2020 Ford Explorer and 2020 Lincoln Aviator vehicles with rear outboard seats with manual seat-back recliner mechanisms. Affected vehicles may be missing the third pawl required for seatback strength. A seatback with an improperly assembled recliner mechanism may have reduced strength and may not adequately restrain an occupant in a crash, increasing the risk of injury. This action affects 483,325 vehicles in the United States and federal territories, 58,712 in Canada and 8,149 in Mexico. Affected vehicles include: 2018-20 Ford F-150 vehicles built at: Dearborn Assembly Plant from Sept. 14, 2018, to Aug. 7, 2019, and Kansas City Assembly Plant from Sept. 11, 2018, through Aug. 2, 2019 2019-20 Ford F-Series Super Duty vehicles built at: Kentucky Assembly Plant from Sept. 9, 2018, through July 22, 2019, and Ohio Assembly Plant from Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • Only Class 3110 Aerospace Roller Bearings Granted a Waiver from The
    LIST CURRENT AS OF 17 SEPTEMBER 2013 List of Class 3110, Aerospace Roller Bearings that have been granted a Waiver from the Non-Manufacturing Rule (NMR) Legend: All of the below bearing Federal Stock Numbers begin with a class-designation of 3110 and are then followed by 9 digits (ex. 000045095), which identifies the specific bearing Below each bold Federal Stock Number are the CAGE codes and names of approved manufacturers of that bearing o The CAGE code is listed first and the name of the manufacturer is below each CAGE code (ex. NTN BEARING CORPORATION OF AMERICA with their CAGE code [0LTL1] listed above ) 000045095 0LTL1 NTN BEARING CORPORATION OF AMERICA 60038 THE TIMKEN CORPORATION Z0992 AUSTRALIAN TIMKEN PTY LTD 000389332 52676 SKF USA INC. 77107 PARAGON POWER INC SUB OF GREAT LAKES 000519119 13499 1 | P a g e LIST CURRENT AS OF 17 SEPTEMBER 2013 ROCKWELL COLLINS INC. DIV GOVERNMENT 40920 MPB CORPORATION DBA TIMKEN SUPER PRE 50294 NEW HAMPSHIRE BALL BEARINGS, INC. DB 000616154 40920 MPB CORPORATION DBA TIMKEN SUPER PRE 83086 NEW HAMPSHIRE BALL BEARINGS INC. DIV 000866964 0LTL1 NTN BEARING CORPORATION OF AMERICA 52676 SKF USA INC. 001000268 0LTL1 NTN BEARING CORPORATION OF AMERICA 3D6E9 AXLETECH INTERNATIONAL LLC 60038 THE TIMKEN CORPORATION 78500 MERITOR HEAVY VEHICLE SYSTEMS LLC DI F0272 2 | P a g e LIST CURRENT AS OF 17 SEPTEMBER 2013 SKF FRANCE F0704 THE TIMKEN COMPANY H2229 RDM TECHNOLOGY B.V. 001000271 06085 BAE SYSTEMS LAND & ARMAMENTS L.P. BA 0LTL1 NTN BEARING CORPORATION OF AMERICA 45152 OSHKOSH CORPORATION 60038 THE TIMKEN CORPORATION 001000282 04627 NACCO MATERIALS HANDLING GROUP INC 0LTL1 NTN BEARING CORPORATION OF AMERICA 60038 THE TIMKEN CORPORATION F0272 SKF FRANCE F0704 THE TIMKEN COMPANY 3 | P a g e LIST CURRENT AS OF 17 SEPTEMBER 2013 001000285 0LTL1 NTN BEARING CORPORATION OF AMERICA 11083 CATERPILLAR INC.
    [Show full text]