DOCSLIB.ORG

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Neethling LSD and 10XRM65

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Neethling LSD and 10XRM65 Comparison of the effectiveness of Neethling LSD and 10xRM65 sheeppox attenuated vaccines - The results of a randomized controlled field study Koret School of Veterinary Medicine Israel Veterinary services Kimron Veterinary Institute Hachaklait 1 Presented by Prof. Eyal Klement - Koret School of Veterinary Medicine …Before we start… • RM65 vaccine – an attenuated sheep-pox vaccine manufactured by ABIC® and JOVAC® • Each dose contains a minimum of 102.5 TCID50 of freeze dried live attenuated sheep-pox vaccine • 1 ml administered S.C. 2 …Before we start… • Neethling vaccine – an attenuated lumpy skin disease vaccine manufactured by OBP • Virus titer dose - 103.5 TCID50* • 2 ml administered S.C. *According to registration file 3 Background • A large LSD outbreak spreading mostly in the north of Israel from July 2012. • Initially, only beef herds were affected. • On October, first cases began to appear among intensive zero- grazing high producing Holstein dairy cattle herds. • Vaccination with attenuated RM65 sheep-pox vaccine did not seem to affect outbreak progression. 4 Previous Israeli experience with RM65 vaccine • Large outbreaks in RM-65 vaccinated herds in Israel: 5 Data regarding Neethling and 10XRM65 vaccines • No controlled clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of these vaccines • Anecdotal data pointing of possible effectiveness of the Neethling disease for controlling LSD in South Africa • Anecdotal data stating the RM65 vaccine in a x10 dose is more effective than the regular dose 6 Study aim • To compare the field effectiveness of 10XRM65 and Neethling attenuated vaccines for prevention of LSD 7 Vaccine preparation • Neethling – According to manufacturer instructions. 2 ml injected S.C. • 10xRM65 – Use 1/5 of the diluent recommended by the manufacturer and inject 2 ml S.C. 8 Study population • 15 dairy cattle herds located in the north of Israel • 4694 cows and 3756 calves and heifers • All herds vaccinated 3- 5 months previously with an RM65 attenuated vaccine 9 Study design • Cows randomized according to skin number: – Even – Neethling – Odd – 10xRM65 • In 7 farms all calves were vaccinated with the Neethling vaccine • In 8 farms all calves were vaccinated with 10XRM65 vaccine 10 Surveillance • All cattle in the herds were monitored daily by the herdsmen for any sign of LSD or other illness • Suspected illness was examined by the herd veterinarian twice weekly and informed immediately to the study veterinarian • When possible, the study veterinarian collected blood and skin specimen biopsies from affected animals 11 Case definitions • LSD case – a cow/calve with at least one typical LSD nodule • Severe case - typical skin nodules accompanied by fever (>39.5 oC) or by a decrease in milk yield of over 20% • Laboratory confirmed case – identification of wild strain by PCR from either skin biopsy or blood (Menasherow S et al. J Virol Methods, 2014) 12 Results • 82 cases occurred in 8 herds which included 5546 vaccinated cows and calves (incidence = 1.5%) • Among cows only the incidence was 76/3077 (2.5%) 13 Crude effectiveness (cows only) • In 5 herds – higher morbidity in 10xRM65 vaccinees. • In 2 herds – Higher morbidity in Neethling vaccinees • In 1 herd – Equal morbidity • RRMH = 1.49 (0.92-2.41) • P-value for heterogeneity = 0.122 14 Crude effectiveness – severe cases • Only cows - RRMH = 3.65 (1.59-8.35) • No significant heterogeneity 15 Accumulation of cases in time 16 Accumulation of severe cases in time 17 Effectiveness (cows)- >14 days post vaccination • 42 cases among 10xRM65 vaccinated cows (incidence=2.7%) vs. 13 cases among Neethling vaccinated cows (0.84%): RRMH=2.64 (1.44-4.82) • 20 cases among 10xRM65 vaccinated cows (incidence=1.3%) vs. 1 case among Neethling vaccinated cows (0.06%): RRMH=11.2 (2.3-54.7) 18 Effectiveness (cows)- Isolation of wild strain • 22 cases among 10xRM65 vaccinated cows (incidence=1.4%) vs. 6 cases among Neethling vaccinated cows (0.84%): RRMH=4.28 (1.59-11.53) 19 Neethling’s disease • 9 confirmed cases out of 2356 vaccinated cows (incidence= 0.4%). Of these 1 severe case • All occurring within 14 days from vaccination • No Isolation of Neethling strain from a non- Neethling vaccinated cow 20 Final conclusions • Relative effectiveness – Neethling vaccine is significantly more effective in preventing LSD. – Relative effectiveness for preventing LSD in cows when full immunity is anticipated (i.e. >14 p.v.) = 62% – Relative effectiveness for preventing severe LSD = 91% – Relative effectiveness for preventing confirmed LSD = 77% 21 …However… • Neethling’s disease: – 0.4% incidence of Neethling’s disease durig the 14 days post vaccination. – Mostly non-severe disease – … though no evidence of transmission of the Neethling strain to non-Neethling vaccinated cows • Outbreak control – Outbreak was fully controlled with extensive use of both vaccines. – Therefore it is conceivable that 10xRM65 is also effective in preventing LSD 22 So... • Which vaccine is better? • It depends on… – Risk assessment – Epidemiological condition 23 Thanks • Prof. Nahum Shpigel – Study initiation, design and conduction • Dr. Nadav Galon and veterinary services – study support, and vaccination performance • Dr. Yonatan Ben-Gera – Study conduction and data coordination • Dr. Yevegeny Chinitz and Dr. Yehuda Stram – virus isolation and identification • Dr. Benny Sharir, Hachaklait veterinarians – vaccination and clinical surveillance • Herdsmen 24.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Outbreak of Sheeppox in Farmed Sheep in Kyrgystan: Histological, Eletron Micro- Scopical and Molecular Characterization
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2016 Outbreak of sheeppox in farmed sheep in Kyrgystan: Histological, eletron microscopical and molecular characterization Aldaiarov, N ; Stahel, A ; Nufer, L ; Jumakanova, Z ; Tulobaev, A ; Ruetten, M Abstract: INTRODUCTION On a farm in the Kyrgyz Republic, several dead sheep were found without any history of illness. The sheep showed several ulcerations on lips and bare-skinned areas. At necropsy the lungs showed multiple firm nodules, which were defined as pox nodules histologically. Intherumen hyperkeratotic plaques were visible. With electron microscopy pox viral particles were detected and con- firmed with q PCR as Capripoxviruses. Although all members of the Capripoxvirus genus are eradicated in western countries, this study should remind us of the classical lesions observed in poxvirus infections. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17236/sat00076 Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-126889 Journal Article Published Version Originally published at: Aldaiarov, N; Stahel, A; Nufer, L; Jumakanova, Z; Tulobaev, A; Ruetten, M (2016). Outbreak of sheep- pox in farmed sheep in Kyrgystan: Histological, eletron microscopical and molecular characterization. Schweizer Archiv für Tierheilkunde, 158(7):529-532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17236/sat00076 Fallberichte | Case reports Outbreak of sheeppox in farmed sheep in Kyrgystan: Histological, eletron micro- scopical
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Infection and Genetic Characterization of Two Different
    viruses Article Experimental Infection and Genetic Characterization of Two Different Capripox Virus Isolates in Small Ruminants Janika Wolff , Jacqueline King, Tom Moritz, Anne Pohlmann , Donata Hoffmann , Martin Beer and Bernd Hoffmann * Institute of Diagnostic Virology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Südufer 10, D-17493 Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany; janika.wolff@fli.de (J.W.); jacqueline.king@fli.de (J.K.); [email protected] (T.M.); anne.pohlmann@fli.de (A.P.); donata.hoffmann@fli.de (D.H.); martin.beer@fli.de (M.B.) * Correspondence: Bernd.Hoffmann@fli.de; Tel.: +49-3835-17-1506 Received: 8 September 2020; Accepted: 26 September 2020; Published: 28 September 2020 Abstract: Capripox viruses, with their members “lumpy skin disease virus (LSDV)”, “goatpox virus (GTPV)” and “sheeppox virus (SPPV)”, are described as the most serious pox diseases of production animals. A GTPV isolate and a SPPV isolate were sequenced in a combined approach using nanopore MinION sequencing to obtain long reads and Illumina high throughput sequencing for short precise reads to gain full-length high-quality genome sequences. Concomitantly, sheep and goats were inoculated with SPPV and GTPV strains, respectively. During the animal trial, varying infection routes were compared: a combined intravenous and subcutaneous infection, an only intranasal infection, and the contact infection between naïve and inoculated animals. Sheep inoculated with SPPV showed no clinical signs, only a very small number of genome-positive samples and a low-level antibody reaction. In contrast, all GTPV inoculated or in-contact goats developed severe clinical signs with high viral genome loads observed in all tested matrices.
    [Show full text]
  • National Program Assessment, Animal Health: 2000-2004
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska 10-5-2004 National Program Assessment, Animal Health: 2000-2004 Cyril G. Gay United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, National Program Staff, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub Part of the Agriculture Commons, Animal Sciences Commons, and the Animal Studies Commons Gay, Cyril G., "National Program Assessment, Animal Health: 2000-2004" (2004). Publications from USDA- ARS / UNL Faculty. 1529. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub/1529 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. U.S. government work. Not subject to copyright. National Program Assessment Animal Health 2000-2004 National Program Assessments are conducted every five-years through the organization of one or more workshop. Workshops allow the Agricultural Research Service (ARS) to periodically update the vision and rationale of each National Program and assess the relevancy, effectiveness, and responsiveness of ARS research. The National Program Staff (NPS) at ARS organizes National Program Workshops to facilitate the review and simultaneously provide an opportunity for customers, stakeholders, and partners to assess the progress made through the National Program and provide input for future modifications to the National Program or the National Program’s research agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnosis and Treatment of Orf
    Vet Times The website for the veterinary profession https://www.vettimes.co.uk Diagnosis and treatment of orf Author : Graham Duncanson Categories : Farm animal, Vets Date : March 3, 2008 When I used to do a meat inspection for an hour each week, I came across a case of orf in one of the slaughtermen. The lesion was on the back of his hand. The GP thought it was an abscess and lanced the pustule. I was certain it was orf and got some pus into a viral transport medium. The Veterinary Investigation Centre in Norwich confirmed the case as orf and it took weeks to heal. I have always taken the zoonotic aspects of this disease very seriously ever since. When I got a pustule on my finger from my own sheep, I took potentiated sulphonamides by mouth and it healed within three weeks. I always advise clients to wear rubber gloves when dealing with the disease. I also advise any affected people to go to their GP, but not to let the doctor lance the lesion. Virus Orf, which should be called contagious pustular dermatitis, is not a pox virus but a Parapoxvirus. It is allied to viral diseases in cattle, pseudocowpox (caused by the most common virus found on the bovine udder) and bovine papular stomatitis (the oral form of pseudocowpox occurring in young cattle). Both these cattle viruses are self-limiting, rarely causing problems. Sheeppox, which is a Capripoxvirus, is not found in the UK or western Europe. However, it seems to have spread from the Middle East to Hungary.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Duplex PCR for Differential Detection of Goatpox And
    Zhao et al. BMC Veterinary Research (2017) 13:278 DOI 10.1186/s12917-017-1179-0 METHODOLOGY ARTICLE Open Access Development of duplex PCR for differential detection of goatpox and sheeppox viruses Zhixun Zhao, Guohua Wu, Xinmin Yan, Xueliang Zhu, Jian Li, Haixia Zhu, Zhidong Zhang* and Qiang Zhang* Abstract Background: Clinically, sheeppox and goatpox have the same symptoms and cannot be distinguished serologically. A cheaper and easy method for differential diagnosis is important in control of this disease in endemic region. Methods: A duplex PCR assay was developed for the specific differential detection of Goatpox virus (GTPV) and Sheeppox virus (SPPV), using two sets of primers based on viral E10R gene and RPO132 gene. Results: Nucleic acid electrophoresis results showed that SPPV-positive samples appear two bands, and GTPV- positive samples only one stripe. There were no cross-reactions with nucleic acids extracted from other pathogens including foot-and-mouth disease virus, Orf virus. The duplex PCR assay developed can specially detect SPPV or GTPV present in samples (n = 135) collected from suspected cases of Capripox. Conclusions: The duplex PCR assay developed is a specific and sensitive method for the differential diagnosis of GTPV and SPPV infection, with the potential to be standardized as a detection method for Capripox in endemic areas. Keywords: Goatpox virus, Sheeppox virus, Duplex PCR assay, Differential diagnosis Background involved in host range and virulence [7]. Sheeppox and Goatpox virus (GTPV) and sheeppox virus (SPPV) are goatpox is an economically important disease in goat members of the genus Capripoxvirus (CaPV) of the and sheep-producing areas of the world [8].
    [Show full text]
  • Here, There, and Everywhere: the Wide Host Range and Geographic Distribution of Zoonotic Orthopoxviruses
    viruses Review Here, There, and Everywhere: The Wide Host Range and Geographic Distribution of Zoonotic Orthopoxviruses Natalia Ingrid Oliveira Silva, Jaqueline Silva de Oliveira, Erna Geessien Kroon , Giliane de Souza Trindade and Betânia Paiva Drumond * Laboratório de Vírus, Departamento de Microbiologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais: Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais 31270-901, Brazil; [email protected] (N.I.O.S.); [email protected] (J.S.d.O.); [email protected] (E.G.K.); [email protected] (G.d.S.T.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The global emergence of zoonotic viruses, including poxviruses, poses one of the greatest threats to human and animal health. Forty years after the eradication of smallpox, emerging zoonotic orthopoxviruses, such as monkeypox, cowpox, and vaccinia viruses continue to infect humans as well as wild and domestic animals. Currently, the geographical distribution of poxviruses in a broad range of hosts worldwide raises concerns regarding the possibility of outbreaks or viral dissemination to new geographical regions. Here, we review the global host ranges and current epidemiological understanding of zoonotic orthopoxviruses while focusing on orthopoxviruses with epidemic potential, including monkeypox, cowpox, and vaccinia viruses. Keywords: Orthopoxvirus; Poxviridae; zoonosis; Monkeypox virus; Cowpox virus; Vaccinia virus; host range; wild and domestic animals; emergent viruses; outbreak Citation: Silva, N.I.O.; de Oliveira, J.S.; Kroon, E.G.; Trindade, G.d.S.; Drumond, B.P. Here, There, and Everywhere: The Wide Host Range 1. Poxvirus and Emerging Diseases and Geographic Distribution of Zoonotic diseases, defined as diseases or infections that are naturally transmissible Zoonotic Orthopoxviruses. Viruses from vertebrate animals to humans, represent a significant threat to global health [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Sheep and Goats
    Sheep Pox and Importance Sheep pox and goat pox are contagious viral diseases of small ruminants. These Goat Pox diseases may be mild in indigenous breeds living in endemic areas, but they are often fatal in newly introduced animals. Economic losses result from decreased milk Capripoxvirus Infections, production, damage to the quality of hides and wool, and other production losses. Sheep Capripox pox and goat pox can limit trade, inhibit the development of intensive livestock production, and prevent new breeds of sheep or goats from being imported into endemic regions. Last Updated: August 2017 Etiology Sheep pox and goat pox result from infection by sheeppox virus (SPPV) or goatpox virus (GTPV), closely related members of the genus Capripoxvirus in the family Poxviridae. SPPV is mainly thought to affect sheep and GTPV primarily to affect goats, but some isolates can cause mild to serious disease in both species. SPPV and GTPV can be distinguished by a few specialized genetic tests. These tests are not widely available, and isolates are typically assigned to SPPV or GTPV based on the animal species affected during an outbreak. However, some studies suggest that this assumption is not always valid. SPPV and GTPV are closely related to lumpy skin disease virus (LSDV), a capripoxvirus that affects cattle. These three viruses cannot be distinguished by many diagnostic tests, including all tests that detect antibodies or viral antigens. Species Affected SPPV and GTPV only appear to affect sheep and goats. It seems plausible that these viruses could cause disease in wild relatives of small ruminants, but there are no reports of any infections in free-living or captive wild species.
    [Show full text]
  • PCR Based Confirmation of Sheeppox Vaccine Virus
    Veterinary World, Vol.3(4): 160 RESEARCH PCR based confirmation of sheeppox vaccine virus Amitha R. Gomes*, Raveendra Hegde, S.M.Byregowda, Suryanarayana T, Ananda H, Yeshwant S. L., P. Giridhar and C. Renukaprasad. Institute of Animal Health and Veterinary Biologicals, Hebbal, Bangalore-24 * Corresponding author Introduction electrophoresis using ten µl of the amplified DNA in 0.8 % agarose stained with ethidium bromide was loaded Sheeppox, a contagious viral disease of sheep, is the most severe of pox infections of animals. The with amplified DNA using bromophenol dye as a disease is of economic importance, as it causes heavy tracking dye along with 100 bp DNA ladder. The gel was mortality in lambs, abortion and mastitis in ewes and run for 90 min at 60 volts and visualized under skin defects (Singh et al., 1979). Vaccination is an ultraviolet transilluminator for the presence of specific effective means of controlling losses from sheeppox. bands. Then the image was captured under gel doc Modified live virus vaccine has been used extensively system. Appropriate controls were incorporated into for protection against sheeppox. The strain was the system. maintained in sheep lamb testicular cells. The virus Results and discussion was confirmed by serological techniques. But these techniques are less sensitive and are slow. In the In the present study the viral DNA was extracted present study an attempt was made to confirm the from the SPV-RF infected cell culture fluid using vaccine strain, Roumanian Fenar strain by PCR bacterial genomic DNA extraction kit. It showed that the method which is considered to be rapid, accurate and kit can efficiently be used for extraction of DNA from more sensitive.
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Evaluation of the Cross-Protection Between
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Experimental evaluation of the cross-protection between Sheeppox and bovine Lumpy skin vaccines Jihane Hamdi1 ✉ , Zahra Bamouh1, Mohammed Jazouli1, Zineb Boumart1, Khalid Omari Tadlaoui1, Ouafaa Fassi Fihri2 & Mehdi EL Harrak1 The Capripoxvirus genus includes three agents: Sheeppox virus, Goatpox virus and Lumpy skin disease virus. Related diseases are of economic importance and present a major constraint to animals and animal products trade in addition to mortality and morbidity. Attenuated vaccines against these diseases are available, but aforded cross-protection is controversial in each specie. In this study, groups of sheep, goats and cattle were vaccinated with Romania SPPV vaccine and challenged with corresponding virulent strains. Sheep and cattle were also vaccinated with Neethling LSDV vaccine and challenged with both virulent SPPV and LSDV strains. Animals were monitored by clinical observation, rectal temperature as well as serological response. The study showed that sheep and goats vaccinated with Romania SPPV vaccine were fully protected against challenge with virulent SPPV and GTPV strains, respectively. However, small ruminants vaccinated with LSDV Neethling vaccine showed only partial protection against challenge with virulent SPPV strain. Cattle showed also only partial protection when vaccinated with Romania SPPV and were fully protected with Neethling LSDV vaccine. This study showed that SPPV and GTPV vaccines are closely related with cross-protection, while LSDV protects only cattle against the corresponding disease, which suggests that vaccination against LSDV should be carried out with homologous strain. Capripoxvirus genus includes 3 viruses, namely Sheeppox virus (SPPV), Goatpox virus (GTPV) and Lumpy Skin Disease Virus of cattle (LSDV). Diseases related to these viruses are of economic importance as they cause signifcant damages on meat, milk production, wool and leather quality in addition to carcass depreciation and mortality1–3.
    [Show full text]
  • Sheep and Goat Pox Standard Operating Procedures: 1
    SHEEP AND GOAT POX STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES: 1. OVERVIEW OF ETIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY DRAFT SEPTEMBER 2016 File name: SPPV_GTPV _FAD PREP_E&E Lead section: Preparedness and Incident Coordination Version number: Draft 1.0 Effective date: September 2016 Review date: September 2018 The Foreign Animal Disease Preparedness and Response Plan (FAD PReP) Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) provide operational guidance for responding to an animal health emergency in the United States. These draft SOPs are under ongoing review. This document was last updated in September 2016. Please send questions or comments to: National Preparedness and Incident Coordination Center Veterinary Services Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service U.S. Department of Agriculture 4700 River Road, Unit 41 Riverdale, Maryland 20737 Fax: (301) 734-7817 E-mail: [email protected] While best efforts have been used in developing and preparing the FAD PReP SOPs, the U.S. Government, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), and the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service and other parties, such as employees and contractors contributing to this document, neither warrant nor assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information or procedure disclosed. The primary purpose of these FAD PReP SOPs is to provide operational guidance to those government officials responding to a foreign animal disease outbreak. It is only posted for public access as a reference. The FAD PReP SOPs may refer to links to various other Federal and State agencies and private organizations. These links are maintained solely for the user’s information and convenience. If you link to such site, please be aware that you are then subject to the policies of that site.
    [Show full text]
  • The Soviet Biological Weapons Program and Its Legacy in Today's
    Occasional Paper 11 The Soviet Biological Weapons Program and Its Legacy in Today’s Russia Raymond A. Zilinskas Center for the Study of Weapons of Mass Destruction National Defense University MR. CHARLES D. LUTES Director MR. JOHN P. CAVES, JR. Deputy Director Since its inception in 1994, the Center for the Study of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD Center) has been at the forefront of research on the implications of weapons of mass destruction for U.S. security. Originally focusing on threats to the military, the WMD Center now also applies its expertise and body of research to the challenges of homeland security. The Center’s mandate includes research, education, and outreach. Research focuses on understanding the security challenges posed by WMD and on fashioning effective responses thereto. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff has designated the Center as the focal point for WMD education in the joint professional military education system. Education programs, including its courses on countering WMD and consequence management, enhance awareness in the next generation of military and civilian leaders of the WMD threat as it relates to defense and homeland security policy, programs, technology, and operations. As a part of its broad outreach efforts, the WMD Center hosts annual symposia on key issues bringing together leaders and experts from the government and private sectors. Visit the center online at http://wmdcenter.ndu.edu. The Soviet Biological Weapons Program and Its Legacy in Today’s Russia Raymond A. Zilinskas Center for the Study of Weapons of Mass Destruction Occasional Paper, No. 11 National Defense University Press Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • An HRM Assay to Differentiate Sheeppox Virus Vaccine
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN An HRM Assay to Diferentiate Sheeppox Virus Vaccine Strains from Sheeppox Virus Field Isolates Received: 10 January 2019 Accepted: 15 April 2019 and other Capripoxvirus Species Published: xx xx xxxx Tesfaye Rufael Chibssa1,2,3, Tirumala Bharani K. Settypalli 1, Francisco J. Berguido1, Reingard Grabherr2, Angelika Loitsch4, Eeva Tuppurainen5, Nick Nwankpa6, Karim Tounkara6, Hafsa Madani7, Amel Omani7, Mariane Diop8, Giovanni Cattoli1, Adama Diallo8,9 & Charles Euloge Lamien 1 Sheep poxvirus (SPPV), goat poxvirus (GTPV) and lumpy skin disease virus (LSDV) afect small ruminants and cattle causing sheeppox (SPP), goatpox (GTP) and lumpy skin disease (LSD) respectively. In endemic areas, vaccination with live attenuated vaccines derived from SPPV, GTPV or LSDV provides protection from SPP and GTP. As live poxviruses may cause adverse reactions in vaccinated animals, it is imperative to develop new diagnostic tools for the diferentiation of SPPV feld strains from attenuated vaccine strains. Within the capripoxvirus (CaPV) homolog of the variola virus B22R gene, we identifed a unique region in SPPV vaccines with two deletions of 21 and 27 nucleotides and developed a High- Resolution Melting (HRM)-based assay. The HRM assay produces four distinct melting peaks, enabling the diferentiation between SPPV vaccines, SPPV feld isolates, GTPV and LSDV. This HRM assay is sensitive, specifc, and provides a cost-efective means for the detection and classifcation of CaPVs and the diferentiation of SPPV vaccines from SPPV feld isolates. Sheeppox (SPP), goatpox (GTP) and lumpy skin disease (LSD) are three important pox diseases of sheep, goat and cattle respectively1,2. Te responsible viruses, sheep poxvirus (SPPV), goat poxvirus (GTPV) and lumpy skin disease virus (LSDV) are large, complex, double-stranded DNA viruses of the genus Capripoxvirus, subfamily Chordopoxvirinae, family Poxviridae3.
    [Show full text]