National Program Assessment, Animal Health: 2000-2004

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

National Program Assessment, Animal Health: 2000-2004 University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska 10-5-2004 National Program Assessment, Animal Health: 2000-2004 Cyril G. Gay United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, National Program Staff, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub Part of the Agriculture Commons, Animal Sciences Commons, and the Animal Studies Commons Gay, Cyril G., "National Program Assessment, Animal Health: 2000-2004" (2004). Publications from USDA- ARS / UNL Faculty. 1529. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub/1529 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. U.S. government work. Not subject to copyright. National Program Assessment Animal Health 2000-2004 National Program Assessments are conducted every five-years through the organization of one or more workshop. Workshops allow the Agricultural Research Service (ARS) to periodically update the vision and rationale of each National Program and assess the relevancy, effectiveness, and responsiveness of ARS research. The National Program Staff (NPS) at ARS organizes National Program Workshops to facilitate the review and simultaneously provide an opportunity for customers, stakeholders, and partners to assess the progress made through the National Program and provide input for future modifications to the National Program or the National Program’s research agenda. A workshop for Animal Health has been scheduled for October 2004, Greensboro, North Carolina. This report provides the accomplishments for the 2000-2004 National Program Cycle. You will find detailed information on research objectives, achievements, and impact. Results are provided according to location. Comments and assessments should be addressed to mailto:[email protected] prior to October 2004. Leading America towards a better future through agricultural research and information. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................4 BACKGROUND INFORMATION................................7 Agricultural Research Service ...........................................................................................................................7 Role....................................................................................................................................................................7 Mission...............................................................................................................................................................7 National Program Cycle.....................................................................................................................................8 National Program Assessment ...........................................................................................................................8 Animal Health National Program (NP 103).......................................................................................................8 ACTION PLAN ..........................................................10 Introduction......................................................................................................................................................10 Research Components......................................................................................................................................10 Research Component 1: Pathogen Detection and Diagnostics.......................................................................10 Research Component 2: Microbial Genomics ................................................................................................11 Research Component 3: Animal Immunology ...............................................................................................11 Research Component 4: Mechanisms of Disease ...........................................................................................12 Research Component 5: Genetic Resistance to Disease.................................................................................13 Research Component 6: Epidemiology of Disease.........................................................................................13 Research Component 7: Strategies to Control Infectious and Non-Infectious Diseases................................14 PROGRAM IMPACT .................................................16 Introduction......................................................................................................................................................16 Pathogen Detection and Diagnostics ...............................................................................................................16 Microbial Genomics.........................................................................................................................................19 Animal Immunology........................................................................................................................................20 Mechanisms of Disease....................................................................................................................................21 Genetic Resistance to Disease .........................................................................................................................23 Epidemiology of Disease .................................................................................................................................24 Strategies to Control Infectious and Non-Infectious Disease..........................................................................27 APPENDIX ................................................................29 PLUM ISLAND DISEASE CENTER..........................30 Foot and Mouth Disease Research...................................................................................................................32 African Swine Fever Research.........................................................................................................................42 1 EASTERN REGIONAL RESEARCH CENTER.........63 Dairy Processing and Products Research.........................................................................................................64 NATIONAL ANIMAL DISEASE CENTER (NADC)...66 Periparturient Diseases of Cattle......................................................................................................................68 Bacterial Diseases of Livestock.......................................................................................................................80 Virus and Prion Diseases of Livestock ............................................................................................................99 Respiratory Diseases of Livestock.................................................................................................................116 AVIAN DISEASE AND ONCOLOGY LABORATORY (ADOL) ....................................................................137 Avian Disease and Oncology Laboratory......................................................................................................138 WESTERN REGIONAL RESEARCH CENTER......151 Foodborne Contaminants Research ...............................................................................................................152 ANIMAL DISEASE RESEARCH UNIT ...................154 Animal Diseases Research Unit.....................................................................................................................155 SOUTHEAST POULTRY RESEARCH LABORATORY .......................................................175 Southeast Poultry Research Laboratory.........................................................................................................176 ANIMAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES INSTITUTE (ANRI) .....................................................................201 Animal Parasitic Diseases Laboratory (APDL).............................................................................................203 Bovine Functional Genomics Laboratory (BFGL)........................................................................................265 U.S. MEAT ANIMAL RESEARCH CENTER (MARC) .................................................................................270 Animal Health Research ................................................................................................................................271 2 ARTHROPOD-BORNE ANIMAL DISEASES RESEARCH (ABADRL)..........................................277 Arthropod-Borne Animal Diseases Research Projects ..................................................................................278 POISONOUS PLANT RESEARCH.........................291 Poisonous Plant Research Projects, Logan, UT.............................................................................................292 POULTRY RESEARCH ..........................................297 Poultry Research Projects ..............................................................................................................................298 POULTRY PRODUCTION AND PRODUCTS SAFETY RESEARCH ............................................................301
Recommended publications
  • Outbreak of Sheeppox in Farmed Sheep in Kyrgystan: Histological, Eletron Micro- Scopical and Molecular Characterization
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2016 Outbreak of sheeppox in farmed sheep in Kyrgystan: Histological, eletron microscopical and molecular characterization Aldaiarov, N ; Stahel, A ; Nufer, L ; Jumakanova, Z ; Tulobaev, A ; Ruetten, M Abstract: INTRODUCTION On a farm in the Kyrgyz Republic, several dead sheep were found without any history of illness. The sheep showed several ulcerations on lips and bare-skinned areas. At necropsy the lungs showed multiple firm nodules, which were defined as pox nodules histologically. Intherumen hyperkeratotic plaques were visible. With electron microscopy pox viral particles were detected and con- firmed with q PCR as Capripoxviruses. Although all members of the Capripoxvirus genus are eradicated in western countries, this study should remind us of the classical lesions observed in poxvirus infections. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17236/sat00076 Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-126889 Journal Article Published Version Originally published at: Aldaiarov, N; Stahel, A; Nufer, L; Jumakanova, Z; Tulobaev, A; Ruetten, M (2016). Outbreak of sheep- pox in farmed sheep in Kyrgystan: Histological, eletron microscopical and molecular characterization. Schweizer Archiv für Tierheilkunde, 158(7):529-532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17236/sat00076 Fallberichte | Case reports Outbreak of sheeppox in farmed sheep in Kyrgystan: Histological, eletron micro- scopical
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Infection and Genetic Characterization of Two Different
    viruses Article Experimental Infection and Genetic Characterization of Two Different Capripox Virus Isolates in Small Ruminants Janika Wolff , Jacqueline King, Tom Moritz, Anne Pohlmann , Donata Hoffmann , Martin Beer and Bernd Hoffmann * Institute of Diagnostic Virology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Südufer 10, D-17493 Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany; janika.wolff@fli.de (J.W.); jacqueline.king@fli.de (J.K.); [email protected] (T.M.); anne.pohlmann@fli.de (A.P.); donata.hoffmann@fli.de (D.H.); martin.beer@fli.de (M.B.) * Correspondence: Bernd.Hoffmann@fli.de; Tel.: +49-3835-17-1506 Received: 8 September 2020; Accepted: 26 September 2020; Published: 28 September 2020 Abstract: Capripox viruses, with their members “lumpy skin disease virus (LSDV)”, “goatpox virus (GTPV)” and “sheeppox virus (SPPV)”, are described as the most serious pox diseases of production animals. A GTPV isolate and a SPPV isolate were sequenced in a combined approach using nanopore MinION sequencing to obtain long reads and Illumina high throughput sequencing for short precise reads to gain full-length high-quality genome sequences. Concomitantly, sheep and goats were inoculated with SPPV and GTPV strains, respectively. During the animal trial, varying infection routes were compared: a combined intravenous and subcutaneous infection, an only intranasal infection, and the contact infection between naïve and inoculated animals. Sheep inoculated with SPPV showed no clinical signs, only a very small number of genome-positive samples and a low-level antibody reaction. In contrast, all GTPV inoculated or in-contact goats developed severe clinical signs with high viral genome loads observed in all tested matrices.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Genomic Study of Attenuated and Virulent Strains of Babesia Bigemina
    pathogens Communication A Comparative Genomic Study of Attenuated and Virulent Strains of Babesia bigemina Bernardo Sachman-Ruiz 1 , Luis Lozano 2, José J. Lira 1, Grecia Martínez 1 , Carmen Rojas 1 , J. Antonio Álvarez 1 and Julio V. Figueroa 1,* 1 CENID-Salud Animal e Inocuidad, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales Agrícolas y Pecuarias, Jiutepec, Morelos 62550, Mexico; [email protected] (B.S.-R.); [email protected] (J.J.L.); [email protected] (G.M.); [email protected] (C.R.); [email protected] (J.A.Á.) 2 Centro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, AP565-A Cuernavaca, Morelos 62210, Mexico; [email protected] * Correspondence: fi[email protected]; Tel.: +52-777-320-5544 Abstract: Cattle babesiosis is a socio-economically important tick-borne disease caused by Apicom- plexa protozoa of the genus Babesia that are obligate intraerythrocytic parasites. The pathogenicity of Babesia parasites for cattle is determined by the interaction with the host immune system and the presence of the parasite’s virulence genes. A Babesia bigemina strain that has been maintained under a microaerophilic stationary phase in in vitro culture conditions for several years in the laboratory lost virulence for the bovine host and the capacity for being transmitted by the tick vector. In this study, we compared the virulome of the in vitro culture attenuated Babesia bigemina strain (S) and the virulent tick transmitted parental Mexican B. bigemina strain (M). Preliminary results obtained by using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) showed that out of 27 virulence genes described Citation: Sachman-Ruiz, B.; Lozano, and analyzed in the B.
    [Show full text]
  • (Alveolata) As Inferred from Hsp90 and Actin Phylogenies1
    J. Phycol. 40, 341–350 (2004) r 2004 Phycological Society of America DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2004.03129.x EARLY EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF DINOFLAGELLATES AND APICOMPLEXANS (ALVEOLATA) AS INFERRED FROM HSP90 AND ACTIN PHYLOGENIES1 Brian S. Leander2 and Patrick J. Keeling Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Program in Evolutionary Biology, Departments of Botany and Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Three extremely diverse groups of unicellular The Alveolata is one of the most biologically diverse eukaryotes comprise the Alveolata: ciliates, dino- supergroups of eukaryotic microorganisms, consisting flagellates, and apicomplexans. The vast phenotypic of ciliates, dinoflagellates, apicomplexans, and several distances between the three groups along with the minor lineages. Although molecular phylogenies un- enigmatic distribution of plastids and the economic equivocally support the monophyly of alveolates, and medical importance of several representative members of the group share only a few derived species (e.g. Plasmodium, Toxoplasma, Perkinsus, and morphological features, such as distinctive patterns of Pfiesteria) have stimulated a great deal of specula- cortical vesicles (syn. alveoli or amphiesmal vesicles) tion on the early evolutionary history of alveolates. subtending the plasma membrane and presumptive A robust phylogenetic framework for alveolate pinocytotic structures, called ‘‘micropores’’ (Cavalier- diversity will provide the context necessary for Smith 1993, Siddall et al. 1997, Patterson
    [Show full text]
  • Review Article Diversity of Eukaryotic Translational Initiation Factor Eif4e in Protists
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Comparative and Functional Genomics Volume 2012, Article ID 134839, 21 pages doi:10.1155/2012/134839 Review Article Diversity of Eukaryotic Translational Initiation Factor eIF4E in Protists Rosemary Jagus,1 Tsvetan R. Bachvaroff,2 Bhavesh Joshi,3 and Allen R. Place1 1 Institute of Marine and Environmental Technology, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, 701 E. Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202, USA 2 Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, 647 Contees Wharf Road, Edgewater, MD 21037, USA 3 BridgePath Scientific, 4841 International Boulevard, Suite 105, Frederick, MD 21703, USA Correspondence should be addressed to Rosemary Jagus, [email protected] Received 26 January 2012; Accepted 9 April 2012 Academic Editor: Thomas Preiss Copyright © 2012 Rosemary Jagus et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The greatest diversity of eukaryotic species is within the microbial eukaryotes, the protists, with plants and fungi/metazoa representing just two of the estimated seventy five lineages of eukaryotes. Protists are a diverse group characterized by unusual genome features and a wide range of genome sizes from 8.2 Mb in the apicomplexan parasite Babesia bovis to 112,000-220,050 Mb in the dinoflagellate Prorocentrum micans. Protists possess numerous cellular, molecular and biochemical traits not observed in “text-book” model organisms. These features challenge some of the concepts and assumptions about the regulation of gene expression in eukaryotes. Like multicellular eukaryotes, many protists encode multiple eIF4Es, but few functional studies have been undertaken except in parasitic species.
    [Show full text]
  • Training Manual for Veterinary Staff on Immunisation Against East Coast Fever
    TRAINING MANUAL FOR VETERINARY STAFF ON IMMUNISATION AGAINST EAST COAST FEVER By S.K.Mbogo, D. P.Kariuki, N.McHardy and R. Payne Revised and updated by: S.G. Ndungu, F. D. Wesonga, M. O. Olum and M. W. Maichomo September 2016 Kenya Agricultural & Livestock Research Organization Training Manual for Veterinary Staff on Immunisation Against East Coast Fever 1 This publication has been supported by GALVmed with funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and UK aid from the UK Government. GALVmed, BMGF and the UK Government do not make any warranties or presentations, expressed or implied, concerning the accuracy on safety of the use of its content and shall not be deemed responsible for any liability related to the practices described in this manual. 2 Training Manual for Veterinary Staff on Immunisation Against East Coast Fever Contents Introduction 5 1. What is East Coast Fever? 6 The life cycle of T. Parva in the vector tick, R. Appendiculatus 6 Stages of the ECF syndrome 9 Questions on East Coast Fever 11 2. Transmission of ECF – the role of the tick 12 Questions on ticks and East Coast Fever 16 3 Immunity to East Coast Fever 17 Questions on immunity to East Coast Fever 19 4 Buffalo – derived theileriosis – “corridor disease”. 20 Questions on corridor disease 21 5. Other tick-borne diseases 22 5.1 Anaplasmosis 22 Other tick –borne disease 24 Questions on anaplasmosis 24 5.2 Babesiosis 25 5.3 Heartwater 28 Questions on heartwater 30 5.4 Other tick-borne diseases 31 Questions on “minor” tick-borne diseases 32 6 The ECFiM system of
    [Show full text]
  • Help Protect Your Herd with the Total Package. Demonstrated Safety and Efficacy
    ENVIRACORTM J-5 | MASTITIS PREVENTION HELP PROTECT YOUR HERD WITH THE TOTAL PACKAGE. DEMONSTRATED SAFETY AND EFFICACY. ENVIRACORTM J-5 | MASTITIS PREVENTION Coliform mastitis. Frightening in its severity and frequent fatality. Well-managed herds that have effectively controlled contagious mastitis are especially at risk for coliform mastitis. It carries the greatest potential for losing a quarter or even the cow, in part 60 to 70 because of bacterial endotoxins. percent70 to 80 Escherichia coli can be found throughout a cow’s environment. Coliformpercent mastitis infections • Up to 53 percent of all coliform mastitis cases are caused by that become clinical1 environmental bacteria.4 • E. coli is the primary bacterium responsible.5 • Milk should be cultured to learn which bacteria are involved so a vaccination program can be targeted. Vaccination should be part of every E. coli mastitis management 50 percent program. E. coli mastitis infections While complete prevention of E. coli mastitis is impossible, established during the dry period that remain dormant vaccination with an E. coli vaccine will help lessen the severity of until shortly after freshening2 cases and help provide an opportunity for successful treatment. $378.13 Average cost of each case of clinical E. coli mastitis3 When coliform mastitis occurs, it can cause: • Fever • Abnormal milk • Lack of appetite • Excessive udder edema • Diarrhea • Dehydration • Dramatic drop in milk production • Death A total package of safety and demonstrated efficacy. ENVIRACORTM J-5 is the safe and effective way to help control clinical signs associated with E. coli mastitis. Efficacy = 2 ½ days shorter duration of E. coli mastitis.6 The three-dose regimen helps stimulate the immune system for optimum response to help fight clinicalE.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnosis and Treatment of Orf
    Vet Times The website for the veterinary profession https://www.vettimes.co.uk Diagnosis and treatment of orf Author : Graham Duncanson Categories : Farm animal, Vets Date : March 3, 2008 When I used to do a meat inspection for an hour each week, I came across a case of orf in one of the slaughtermen. The lesion was on the back of his hand. The GP thought it was an abscess and lanced the pustule. I was certain it was orf and got some pus into a viral transport medium. The Veterinary Investigation Centre in Norwich confirmed the case as orf and it took weeks to heal. I have always taken the zoonotic aspects of this disease very seriously ever since. When I got a pustule on my finger from my own sheep, I took potentiated sulphonamides by mouth and it healed within three weeks. I always advise clients to wear rubber gloves when dealing with the disease. I also advise any affected people to go to their GP, but not to let the doctor lance the lesion. Virus Orf, which should be called contagious pustular dermatitis, is not a pox virus but a Parapoxvirus. It is allied to viral diseases in cattle, pseudocowpox (caused by the most common virus found on the bovine udder) and bovine papular stomatitis (the oral form of pseudocowpox occurring in young cattle). Both these cattle viruses are self-limiting, rarely causing problems. Sheeppox, which is a Capripoxvirus, is not found in the UK or western Europe. However, it seems to have spread from the Middle East to Hungary.
    [Show full text]
  • PROGRAM and PROCEEDINGS Dr. Fredric W. Scott
    PROGRAM and PROCEEDINGS of the 94th Annual Meeting December 8, 9 and 10, 2013 Marriott, Downtown Magnificent Mile Chicago, Illinois Robert P. Ellis, Executive Editor http://www.cvmbs.colostate.edu/mip/crwad/ The 94th Annual Meeting of the CRWAD is dedicated to Dr. Fredric W. Scott Proceedings Distributed by CRWAD CRWAD 94th ANNUAL MEETING-2013 December 8 – 10, 2013 All attendees and presenters are required to wear their name badges at all times. Registration - 5th Floor Registration Booth Sunday 10 AM - 5:30 PM Monday 7:00 AM - Noon, 2 - 5 PM Tuesday 8 - 11 AM Researchers Reception - Welcome all attendees. Casual Wear Sunday, December 8, 6-8 PM – Grand Ballroom Salon III - 7th Floor Introduction of CRWAD Officers and Dedicatee, Poster Session I Student Reception – Students and invited guests - 5:00 PM – 5:45PM, Salon II Room, 7th Floor Business Meeting - Chicago Ballroom A/B/C/D 5th Floor 11:45 AM - 12:30 PM Tuesday, December 10 Dedication of the meeting, Introduction of New Members, Grad Student Awards New member applicants and students entered in competition are invited and encouraged to attend. Speaker Ready Room is: Streeterville Room (2nd floor) - Sunday, Dec. 8 - Monday, Dec. 9 Marriott Hotel Monday AM Monday PM Tuesday AM 8:00 - 11:30 1:30 - 4:30 8:00 - 11:30 Section Room Room Room Abstract Nos. Abstracts Nos. Abstracts Nos. Bacterial Avenue Ballroom Avenue Ballroom Pathogenesis 001 – 008 009 – 019 Biosafety and Denver/Houston Biosecurity 020 – 026 Companion Animal Epidemiology Michigan/Michigan Michigan/Michigan State State 027
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Infection of Calves with Transfected Attenuated Babesia
    pathogens Article Experimental Infection of Calves with Transfected Attenuated Babesia bovis Expressing the Rhipicephalus microplus Bm86 Antigen and eGFP Marker: Preliminary Studies towards a Dual Anti-Tick/Babesia Vaccine Monica L. Mazuz 1,*,†, Jacob M. Laughery 2,†, Benjamin Lebovitz 1, Daniel Yasur-Landau 1, Assael Rot 1, Reginaldo G. Bastos 2, Nir Edery 3, Ludmila Fleiderovitz 1, Maayan Margalit Levi 1 and Carlos E. Suarez 2,4,* 1 Division of Parasitology, Kimron Veterinary Institute, P.O.B. 12, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel; [email protected] (B.L.); [email protected] (D.Y.-L.); [email protected] (A.R.); [email protected] (L.F.); [email protected] (M.M.L.) 2 Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-7040, USA; [email protected] (J.M.L.); [email protected] (R.G.B.) 3 Division of Pathology, Kimron Veterinary Institute, P.O.B. 12, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel; [email protected] 4 Animal Disease Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, WSU, Pullman, WA 99164-6630, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] (M.L.M.); [email protected] (C.E.S.); Tel.: +972-3-968-1690 (M.L.M.); Tel.: +1-509-335-6341 (C.E.S.) † These authors contribute equally to this work. Citation: Mazuz, M.L.; Laughery, Abstract: Bovine babesiosis, caused by Babesia bovis and B. bigemina, is a major tick-borne disease of J.M.; Lebovitz, B.; Yasur-Landau, D.; cattle with global economic impact. The disease can be prevented using integrated control measures Rot, A.; Bastos, R.G.; Edery, N.; including attenuated Babesia vaccines, babesicidal drugs, and tick control approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G
    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Epidemiology and Control of cattle ticks and tick-borne infections in Central Nigeria Vincenzo Lorusso Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Edinburgh 2014 Ph.D. – The University of Edinburgh – 2014 Cattle ticks and tick-borne infections, Central Nigeria 2014 Declaration I declare that the research described within this thesis is my own work and that this thesis is my own composition and I certify that it has never been submitted for any other degree or professional qualification. Vincenzo Lorusso Edinburgh 2014 Ph.D. – The University of Edinburgh – 2014 i Cattle ticks and tick -borne infections, Central Nigeria 2014 Abstract Cattle ticks and tick-borne infections (TBIs) undermine cattle health and productivity in the whole of sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) including Nigeria.
    [Show full text]
  • Review on Bovine Babesiosis and Its Economical Importance
    Central Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Research Bringing Excellence in Open Access Review Article *Corresponding author Jemal Jabir Yusuf, Jimma, P.O. Box. 307, Ethiopia, Tel: +251 935674041; Email: [email protected] Review on Bovine Babesiosis Submitted: 18 May 2017 Accepted: 22 June 2017 and its Economical Importance Published: 24 June 2017 ISSN: 2378-931X Jemal Jabir Yusuf* Copyright College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Jimma University, Ethiopia © 2017 Yusuf OPEN ACCESS Abstract Babesiosis is a tick-borne disease of cattle caused by the protozoan parasites. The Keywords causative agents of Babesiosis are specific for particular species of animals. In cattle: B. bovis • Babesia and B. bigemina are the common species involved in babesiosis. Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) spp., • Protozoa the principal vectors of B. bovis and B. bigemina, are widespread in tropical and subtropical • Tick countries. Babesia multiplies in erythrocytes by asynchronous binary fission, resulting in • Vector control considerable pleomorphism. Babesia produces acute disease by two principle mechanism; hemolysis and circulatory disturbance. Affected animals suffered from marked rise in body temperature, loss of appetite, cessation of rumination, labored breathing, emaciation, progressive hemolytic anemia, various degrees of jaundice (Icterus). Lesions include an enlarged soft and pulpy spleen, a swollen liver, a gall bladder distended with thick granular bile, congested dark-coloured kidneys and generalized anemia and jaundice. The disease can be diagnosis by identification of the agent by using direct microscopic examination, nucleic acid-based diagnostic assays, in vitro culture and animal inoculation as well as serological tests like indirect fluorescent antibody, complement fixation and Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays tests. Babesiosis occurs throughout the world.
    [Show full text]