DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Report World Heritage 43 COM WHC/19/43.COM/19 Paris, 10 July 2019 Original: English UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE Forty-third session Baku, Republic of Azerbaijan 30 June – 10 July 2019 REPORT Decisions adopted during the 43rd session of the World Heritage Committee (Baku, 2019) Part 2 (Decisions 43 COM 8 to 43 COM 17) DRAFT 8. Establishment of the World Heritage List and of the List of World Heritage in Danger 8. Nomination Process Draft Decision: 43 COM 8 The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC/19/43.COM/8, 2. Recalling Decision 42 COM 8 adopted at its 42nd session (Manama, 2018), 3. Reaffirming the overriding necessity to continue to work towards bringing greater convergence between the decisions taken by the Committee and the recommendations of the Advisory Bodies; 4. Expresses its appreciation for the work of the ad-hoc Working Group, the experts that have participated to the Tunis Meeting, the Advisory Bodies and the World Heritage Centre for their work on the ongoing reflection on the revision of the nomination process; 5. Also recalling that the Operational Guidelines set out the conditions for inscription on the World Heritage List, strongly reiterates that only meeting criteria is not enough to warrant inscription, as to be deemed of Outstanding Universal Value a site must also meet the conditions of integrity (and authenticity) and must have an adequate protection and management system to ensure its safeguarding, as outlined in paragraph 78 of the Operational Guidelines; 6. Recalling Decision 35 COM 12B, requests States Parties to refrain from providing additional information regarding nominations after the deadlines indicated in the Operational Guidelines, as this information is not able to be evaluated by the Advisory Bodies; 7. Taking note of the discussions during the 43rd session of the World Heritage Committee concerning the referral mechanism, requestsREPORT the review of the referral procedure and its application be included for examination in the framework of the ongoing reflection on the revision of the nomination process; 8. Recommends that consideration is given to using the opportunity of the 50th anniversary of the World Heritage Convention in 2022 to undertake a reflection on the Global Strategy. 8A. Tentative Lists submitted by States Parties as of 15 April 2019, in conformity with the Operational Guidelines Draft Decision: 43 COM 8A The World Heritage Committee, 1. DRAFTHaving examined Document WHC/19/43.COM/8A.Rev, 2. Stressing the importance of the process of revision and updating of Tentative Lists, as a tool for regional harmonisation of the World Heritage List and long-term planning of its development; 1 3. Encourages States Parties to seek as early as possible upstream advice from the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies during the development or revision of their Tentative Lists as appropriate; 4. Takes note of the Tentative Lists presented in Annexes 2 and 3 of this document. 8B. Nominations to the World Heritage List I. CHANGES TO NAMES OF PROPERTIES INSCRIBED ON THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST Draft Decision: 43 COM 8B.1 The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC/19/43.COM/8B, 2. Approves the name change to the Golden Temple of Dambulla as proposed by the Sri Lankan authorities. The name of the property becomes Rangiri Dambulla Cave Temple in English and Temple troglodyte de Rangiri Dambulla in French. Draft Decision: 43 COM 8B.2 The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC/19/43.COM/8B, 2. Approves the name change to the Kiev: Saint-Sophia Cathedral and Related Monastic Buildings, Kiev-Pechersk Lavra as proposed by the Ukrainian authorities. The name of the property becomes Kyiv: Saint-Sophia CathedralREPORT and Related Monastic Buildings, Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra in English and Kyiv : Cathédrale Sainte-Sophie et ensemble des bâtiments monastiques et Laure de Kyiv-Petchersk in French. II. EXAMINATION OF NOMINATIONS OF NATURAL, MIXED AND CULTURAL SITES A. NATURAL SITES A.1. ASIA - PACIFIC A.1.1. New Nominations Draft Decision: 43 COM 8B.3 TheDRAFT World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Documents WHC/19/43.COM/8B and WHC/19/43.COM/INF.8B2, 2. Inscribes the Migratory Bird Sanctuaries along the Coast of Yellow Sea-Bohai Gulf of China (Phase I), China on the World Heritage List on the basis of criterion (x); 3. Takes note of the following provisional Statement of Outstanding Universal Value: 2 Brief Synthesis The Migratory Bird Sanctuaries along the Coast of the Yellow Sea-Bohai Gulf of China (Phase I) is situated in the largest intertidal wetland system in the world and one of the most biologically diverse. The property is an irreplaceable and indispensable hub for birds migrating along the East Asian-Australasian Flyway, which spans some 20 countries across two hemispheres from the Arctic to South-East Asia and Australasia. The global importance of the wider coastal area is evidenced by several Ramsar sites, some of which fully or partially overlap with components of the property. Thus, this property is a globally significant example of the shared natural heritage embodied in migratory birds. The two components of the property are both along the coast of the Yellow Sea: 1) YS1- the Jiangsu Dafeng National Nature Reserve, the southern section and Dongsha Experimental Zone of Jiangsu Yancheng National Nature Reserve and the Tiaozini area (totalling 173,110 ha including a buffer zone of 28,271); and 2) YS-2 the middle section of Jiangsu Yancheng National Nature Reserve (95,589 ha including a buffer zone of 51,785). The total area of the two components is 188,643 ha plus a buffer zone of 80,056 ha. The two components are about 30 kilometers apart, separated by the Dafeng Port and surrounding areas with dense human activity. Human activity has transformed some of the tidal wetlands and there is need for measures to halt major threats and restore key migratory bird habitats. The intertidal wetlands of the Yellow Sea-Bohai Gulf span three countries: China, North Korea and the Republic of Korea. In each country, the wetlands support crucial habitats for birds migrating along the East Asian-Australasian Flyway. Further national and transnational serial nominations, and/or extensions will strengthen the Outstanding Universal Value of this property. Criterion (x): Biodiversity and threatened species ‘Migratory Bird Sanctuaries along the Coast of Yellow Sea-Bohai Gulf of China (Phase I)’ supports some 680 species of vertebrates, including an estimated 415 species of birds, 26 species of mammals, 9 species of amphibians,REPORT 14 species of reptiles, 216 species of fish, as well as 165 species of zoobenthos. The property’s tidal flats are of exceptional importance for the conservation of the world’s migratory birds, supporting internationally significant numbers of migratory bird species, including Critically Endangered, Endangered and other IUCN Red List species. The Phase I tidal flats are significant for more than 10% of the East Asian-Australasian Flyway populations and provide critical habitat for two of the world’s rarest migratory birds – the Critically Endangered Spoon- billed Sandpiper and the Endangered Nordmann’s Greenshank, which depend on the tidal flats for their continued survival. The tidal flats also provide important migratory habitat for the Endangered Black-faced Spoonbill, Oriental Stork, Red-crowned Crane and Great Knot; the Vulnerable Chinese Egret, Dalmatian Pelican, Swan Goose, Relict Gull and Saunders’s Gull; and several Near Threatened migratory bird species, including the Red Knot, Asian Dowitcher, Black-tailed Godwit, Eurasian Curlew, Bar-tailed Godwit, Reed Parrotbill, Curlew Sandpiper, Greater Sand Plover, Lesser Sand Plover and Ruddy Turnstone. Other migratory bird that utilise the property include the Eurasian Oystercatcher, Pied Avocet, Grey Plover, Kentish plover, Far Eastern Curlew, Broad- billed Sandpiper, Red-necked Stint, Sanderling, Dunlin, Terek Sandpiper, Saunders’s DRAFTGull and Common Tern. Integrity The property underpins the viability of the central hub of East Asian-Australasian Flyway, one of the world’s most important flyways and arguably the most fragile. Large aggregations of birds depend on the coast as a stop-over, moulting, staging, wintering, foraging or breeding grounds. The two components of the property include clear boundaries for adequate protection of birds when they are on-site. The property 3 comprises large tracts of mudflats, beaches and other key stopover habitats for migrating birds. The intertidal mudflats, marshes and shallow waters are exceptionally productive and provide spawning and nursery habitat for many fish and crustacean species. In particular, the intertidal mudflats attract a high diversity and enormous number of resident and migratory birds. The main body of the marine deposition plain and mudflat was formed before 1855, when the Yellow River changed its course. This intertidal mudflat is still mainly in the process of accumulation owing to marine hydrological processes, which have shaped the crucial habitat for migratory birds, including the threatened species listed above. Large rivers (including the Yellow River, Yangtze River, Yalu River, Liao River, Luan River, and Hai River) continuously discharge sediments into the Yellow Sea and Bohai Gulf, accumulating to form a series of different habitat types such as mudflats, beaches, and swamps, providing habitats for various migratory birds. These globally important habitats maintain the extraordinary bird biodiversity on the East Asian- Australasian Flyway, as well as the high diversity of other species from phytoplankton to marine mammals. Protection and management requirements The two components are both state-owned and fully legally protected by law. “Ecological Red Lines”, designated by the Government of China, identify the natural coastline proposed for retention. Resource use and access in the coastal areas is severely restricted. YS-1 and YS-2 have the protection status of National Nature Reserves (with the exception of the Tiaozini area).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Standardization of Chinese Local History Compilations
    Submitted on: 11.09.2019 Title of the Satellite Meeting: Local History and Genealogy Satellite Meeting 2019 Date: 21-22 August 2019 Location: University library “Svetozar Marković”, Belgrade, Serbia Standardization of Chinese Local History Compilations Qiu Xinli [email protected] Zhou Youngjin [email protected] Copyright © 2019 by Qiu Xinli and Zhou Youngjin. This work is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Abstract: There is a close racial relationship between Taiwan’s aborigines and New Zealand’s Māori people. During process of immigration from Taiwan to New Zealand, revealing the two races connected. Through evidence of the words “Genealogy”, “Whakapapa” “Family Chronicles” which have similarity but also differences. The language differences existed but in what extent the differences are. The major objective of this study is to compare the differences among these concepts of whakapapa, genealogy and family chronicles to explore the meanings beyond these three words. Authors retrieved Māori and related literature to find out the differences. The difficulties came from that aborigines did not have archives or written records of the history. However, there are not sufficient information available. With limited information, authors extract valuable concept worth further exploration. Authors suggest that public libraries of these two area should systematically collect related information. The other suggestion is to produce oral history of local aborigines in order to maintain the language heritage and cultural development. Keywords: Traditional Chinese Historiography, Local History, Chinese Local Chronicle, Standardized Management I. Introduction The archaeological ruins of Liangzhu City in Hangzhou, China, was officially included on the World Heritage List at the 43rd World Heritage Conference held in Baku, Azerbaijani, on July 6, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Ceramic's Influence on Chinese Bronze Development
    Ceramic’s Influence on Chinese Bronze Development Behzad Bavarian and Lisa Reiner Dept. of MSEM College of Engineering and Computer Science September 2007 Photos on cover page Jue from late Shang period decorated with Painted clay gang with bird, fish and axe whorl and thunder patterns and taotie design from the Neolithic Yangshao creatures, H: 20.3 cm [34]. culture, H: 47 cm [14]. Flat-based jue from early Shang culture Pou vessel from late Shang period decorated decorated with taotie beasts. This vessel with taotie creatures and thunder patterns, H: is characteristic of the Erligang period, 24.5 cm [34]. H: 14 cm [34]. ii Table of Contents Abstract Approximate timeline 1 Introduction 2 Map of Chinese Provinces 3 Neolithic culture 4 Bronze Development 10 Clay Mold Production at Houma Foundry 15 Coins 16 Mining and Smelting at Tonglushan 18 China’s First Emperor 19 Conclusion 21 References 22 iii The transition from the Neolithic pottery making to the emergence of metalworking around 2000 BC held significant importance for the Chinese metal workers. Chinese techniques sharply contrasted with the Middle Eastern and European bronze development that relied on annealing, cold working and hammering. The bronze alloys were difficult to shape by hammering due to the alloy combination of the natural ores found in China. Furthermore, China had an abundance of clay and loess materials and the Chinese had spent the Neolithic period working with and mastering clay, to the point that it has been said that bronze casting was made possible only because the bronze makers had access to superior ceramic technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Originally, the Descendants of Hua Xia Were Not the Descendants of Yan Huang
    E-Leader Brno 2019 Originally, the Descendants of Hua Xia were not the Descendants of Yan Huang Soleilmavis Liu, Activist Peacepink, Yantai, Shandong, China Many Chinese people claimed that they are descendants of Yan Huang, while claiming that they are descendants of Hua Xia. (Yan refers to Yan Di, Huang refers to Huang Di and Xia refers to the Xia Dynasty). Are these true or false? We will find out from Shanhaijing ’s records and modern archaeological discoveries. Abstract Shanhaijing (Classic of Mountains and Seas ) records many ancient groups of people in Neolithic China. The five biggest were: Yan Di, Huang Di, Zhuan Xu, Di Jun and Shao Hao. These were not only the names of groups, but also the names of individuals, who were regarded by many groups as common male ancestors. These groups first lived in the Pamirs Plateau, soon gathered in the north of the Tibetan Plateau and west of the Qinghai Lake and learned from each other advanced sciences and technologies, later spread out to other places of China and built their unique ancient cultures during the Neolithic Age. The Yan Di’s offspring spread out to the west of the Taklamakan Desert;The Huang Di’s offspring spread out to the north of the Chishui River, Tianshan Mountains and further northern and northeastern areas;The Di Jun’s and Shao Hao’s offspring spread out to the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River, where the Di Jun’s offspring lived in the west of the Shao Hao’s territories, which were near the sea or in the Shandong Peninsula.Modern archaeological discoveries have revealed the authenticity of Shanhaijing ’s records.
    [Show full text]
  • The Zhuan Xupeople Were the Founders of Sanxingdui Culture and Earliest Inhabitants of South Asia
    E-Leader Bangkok 2018 The Zhuan XuPeople were the Founders of Sanxingdui Culture and Earliest Inhabitants of South Asia Soleilmavis Liu, Author, Board Member and Peace Sponsor Yantai, Shangdong, China Shanhaijing (Classic of Mountains and Seas) records many ancient groups of people (or tribes) in Neolithic China. The five biggest were: Zhuan Xu, Di Jun, Huang Di, Yan Di and Shao Hao.However, the Zhuan Xu People seemed to have disappeared when the Yellow and Chang-jiang river valleys developed into advanced Neolithic cultures. Where had the Zhuan Xu People gone? Abstract: Shanhaijing (Classic of Mountains and Seas) records many ancient groups of people in Neolithic China. The five biggest were: Zhuan Xu, Di Jun, Huang Di, Yan Di and Shao Hao. These were not only the names of individuals, but also the names of groups who regarded them as common male ancestors. These groups used to live in the Pamirs Plateau, later spread to other places of China and built their unique ancient cultures during the Neolithic Age. Shanhaijing reveals Zhuan Xu’s offspring lived near the Tibetan Plateau in their early time. They were the first who entered the Tibetan Plateau, but almost perished due to the great environment changes, later moved to the south. Some of them entered the Sichuan Basin and became the founders of Sanxingdui Culture. Some of them even moved to the south of the Tibetan Plateau, living near the sea. Modern archaeological discoveries have revealed the authenticity of Shanhaijing ’s records. Keywords: Shanhaijing; Neolithic China, Zhuan Xu, Sanxingdui, Ancient Chinese Civilization Introduction Shanhaijing (Classic of Mountains and Seas) records many ancient groups of people in Neolithic China.
    [Show full text]
  • Jade Huang and Chinese Culture Identity: Focus on the Myth of “Huang of Xiahoushi”
    Journal of Literature and Art Studies, June 2016, Vol. 6, No. 6, 603-618 doi: 10.17265/2159-5836/2016.06.003 D DAVID PUBLISHING Jade Huang and Chinese Culture Identity: Focus on the Myth of “Huang of Xiahoushi” TANG Qi-cui, WU Yu-wei Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China This paper focus on the myth of “Huang of Xiahoushi” (夏后氏之璜), focusing on the distribution of Jade Huang (玉璜) since the early neolithic and its process of pluralistic integration. The paper explores the story of ethnic group, cultural identification and the significance of Jade Huang in the discourse construction of etiquette civilization behind the mythic narrative based on multi-evidence method and the local meaning of literature in ancient Chinese context. Keywords: Jade Huang, Huang of Xiahoushi, unified diversity, Chinese identity, etiquette civilization, multi-evidence method Introduction Modern archeological relics including potteries, jades and bronzes bring back the lost history; the process of how Chinese unified diversity took shape in general and the great tradition of jade culture in eight thousand in particular. The handed-down documents echo each other at a distance provide solid evidences for the origin of civilization of rite and music and the core values based on jade belief. Jade Huang is an important one of it. It is illuminated by numerous records about Jade Huang in ancient literature, as well as a large number of archaeology findings past 7,000 years. The paper seeks to focus on the following questions: what is the function of Jade Huang in historic and prehistoric period? Moreover, what is the function of “Huang of Xiahoushi”, which belonged to emperor and symbolized special power in historic documents and myths and legends in ancient china? Jade Huang: Etiquette and Literature Jade Huang (Yu Huang, Semi-circular/annular Jade Pendant) is a type of jade artifact which is seemed to be remotely related to etiquette and literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Hangzhou Silk”
    Asian Social Science; Vol. 13, No. 5; 2017 ISSN 1911-2017 E-ISSN 1911-2025 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education The Meaning and Evolution of the Name “Hangzhou Silk” Xiangyang Bian1, Aijuan Cao1,2 & Dongmao Ren3 1 Fashion & Art Design Institute, Donghua University, Shanghai, China 2 Highfashion Womenwear Institute of Hangzhou Vocational & Technical College, Hangzhou, China; 3 Former Hangzhou Silk Industry Association, Hangzhou, China Correspondence: Bian Xiangyang, Fashion & Art Design Institute, Donghua University, Shanghai, NO.1882, West Yan-an Road, 200051, China. Tel: 86-21-6237-3978. E-mail: [email protected] Received: March 6, 2017 Accepted: March 29, 2017 Online Published: April 19, 2017 doi:10.5539/ass.v13n5p131 URL: https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v13n5p131 Abstract With regard to the meaning and evolution of "Hangzhou Silk", the author uses the documentary research methodology to trim and verify from three aspects of industry name, product name and brand name respectively, attempting to find out the source of "Hangzhou Silk" from historical documents. Research shows that, as the industry name being called as "Hangzhou satin industry" or "Hangzhou silk weaving industry", it was generally called as the "Hangzhou Silk and Satin Industry” after the combination of Hangzhou Silk Reeling Industry Association and Hangzhou Silk Weaving Industry Association until 1952. As the product name being called as "Hangzhou silk” or “Hangzhou satin", it was called as “Hangzhou silk “after the China liberation. As the brand name, it referred to the specific silk products of Hangzhou region in particular after being awarded of protection as Chinese national geographical mark product since September 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • The Neolithic Ofsouthern China-Origin, Development, and Dispersal
    The Neolithic ofSouthern China-Origin, Development, and Dispersal ZHANG CHI AND HSIAO-CHUN HUNG INTRODUCTION SANDWICHED BETWEEN THE YELLOW RIVER and Mainland Southeast Asia, southern China1 lies centrally within eastern Asia. This geographical area can be divided into three geomorphological terrains: the middle and lower Yangtze allu­ vial plain, the Lingnan (southern Nanling Mountains)-Fujian region,2 and the Yungui Plateau3 (Fig. 1). During the past 30 years, abundant archaeological dis­ coveries have stimulated a rethinking of the role ofsouthern China in the prehis­ tory of China and Southeast Asia. This article aims to outline briefly the Neolithic cultural developments in the middle and lower Yangtze alluvial plain, to discuss cultural influences over adjacent regions and, most importantly, to examine the issue of southward population dispersal during this time period. First, we give an overview of some significant prehistoric discoveries in south­ ern China. With the discovery of Hemudu in the mid-1970s as the divide, the history of archaeology in this region can be divided into two phases. The first phase (c. 1920s-1970s) involved extensive discovery, when archaeologists un­ earthed Pleistocene human remains at Yuanmou, Ziyang, Liujiang, Maba, and Changyang, and Palaeolithic industries in many caves. The major Neolithic cul­ tures, including Daxi, Qujialing, Shijiahe, Majiabang, Songze, Liangzhu, and Beiyinyangying in the middle and lower Yangtze, and several shell midden sites in Lingnan, were also discovered in this phase. During the systematic research phase (1970s to the present), ongoing major ex­ cavation at many sites contributed significantly to our understanding of prehis­ toric southern China. Additional early human remains at Wushan, Jianshi, Yun­ xian, Nanjing, and Hexian were recovered together with Palaeolithic assemblages from Yuanmou, the Baise basin, Jianshi Longgu cave, Hanzhong, the Li and Yuan valleys, Dadong and Jigongshan.
    [Show full text]
  • ASEM Seminar on Single Window Cooperation
    INFORMATION NOTE ASEM Seminar on Single Window Cooperation 29th - 31st October, 2019 Deefly Zhejiang Hotel, Hangzhou, China ASEM Seminar on Single Window Cooperation 1. PURPOSE 1.1 This information note provides general information on the arrangements for the ASEM Seminar on Single Window Cooperation, which will be held in Hangzhou, China. 2. DATES & VENUE 2.1 The ASEM Seminar on Single Window Cooperation will be held from 29th to 31st October, 2019 at Deefly Zhejiang Hotel (Add: No. 278, San Tai Shan Road) Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China. Deefly Zhejiang Hotel is located in the famous West Lake resort area. 3. REGISTRATION OF DELEGATES 3.1 All delegates are kindly requested to fill in the registration form attached herewith and send it back to China Customs’ contact persons. 4. CONTACT INFORMATION 4.1 Inquiries relating to the agenda of the seminar, delegate registration, logistical arrangements and organizational matters should be directed to: Mr. QIN Da Tel. No.: +86-10-65195495 Mob. No.: +86-18304798855 E-mail: [email protected]; Mr. HU Li Tel. No.:+86-10-65195935 Mob. No.: +86-15888100566 E-mail: [email protected]. 5. SEMINAR PACKAGE 5.1 Morning tea and afternoon tea will be provided during the three-day Seminar. 5.2 The official welcome dinner will be held at Deefly Zhejiang Hotel on Tuesday 29 Oct., 2019. 5.3 Please note that halal food will also be provided besides traditional Chinese delicacies. 6. DRESS CODE 6.1 Delegates and observers are kindly requested to come in formal attire during the Seminar. 7. PASSPORT & VISA 7.1 All international delegates are required to enter and leave China with a valid passport issued by or on behalf of the Government of a country of which he or she is a national or citizen.
    [Show full text]
  • Rasti Chinese Art
    Rasti Chinese Art Ritual | Vessel 儀 | 皿 2020 RV (r1).indd 1 30/7/2020 下午5:20 RV (r1).indd 2 30/7/2020 下午5:20 Rasti Chinese Art Ritual | Vessel 儀 | 皿 2020 RV (r2).indd 1 10/8/2020 上午11:59 INTRODUCTION The themes of this exhibition are archaic jade ritual objects and vessels from later periods, many with designs based on archaic examples. We continue to focus on jades whose colours have been altered over time, from the simple jet-black huang (no. 1) from the Xiajiadian Xiaceng Culture, (c. 2200–1000 BCE) to more intricately decorated pieces such as the unusually small but gloriously coloured disc with bird designs (no. 11) from the Western Han dynasty (206 BCE–8 CE) which relates very closely to larger examples previously in the collections of C. F. Wu and Songzhutang. The larger of the two Qijia Culture (2200–1600 BCE) black jade congs (no. 8) is impressive in size, its opaque chalky-white patches caused by burial contrast sharply to the stone’s natural tones. The colours of the Western Zhou dynasty (1100–771 BCE) deep russet and white jade cong (no. 9) is lustrous and vibrant from burial and later handling. Although its carving is most likely added during the Song dynasty (960–1279), it is nevertheless a superb object. It is evident that the shimmering ivory and russet toned Shang dynasty (1600–1100 BCE) high- collared disc (no. 10) was also frequently handled and thus shows a fine patina. We present three agate vessels from different periods.
    [Show full text]
  • Liangzhu Culture Jade, 1989, Nanjing Museum City Planning
    City Planning and (Political) Belief Systems in China: A Study of Maps and Fengshui Liangzhu Cong (3300 - 2200 BC), Liangzhu Culture Jade, 1989, Nanjing Museum TLV mirror. Han dynasty. Bronze. Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York. Study décor of bronzes Lisa brings to conference The Artificer’s Record (Kaogong ji; 5th c BCE) gives a canonical description of a royal city The artisans demarcated the ruler’s capital as a square with sides of nine li, each side having three gates. Within the capital there were nine meridionial [north-south] avenues and nine latitudinal [east-west] avenues, each avenue being nine chariot tracks in width. The ancestral temple was sited to the left [of the ruler’s central position], while the altar of soil was sited to the right. The [ruler’s] court faced south, while the market was sited to its rear. Both market and court are plots one hundred double-paces square. (See Chinese Art and Culture, p. 93). Map of Beijing. 1796-1820. Woodcut mounted as hanging scroll; 108.5 x 63.5 cm. National Library of China, Beijing (History Through Maps, p. 48) Li Cheng. Temple Among Clearing Peaks. Hanging scroll, ink And color on silk; 110.5cm x 55.7cm (43.5in x 21.9 in) (National Palace Museum, Taipei) Fan Kuan. Traveling Amid Mountains and Streams. Northern Song. Hanging scroll, ink and light color on silk; 2.06 m. x 103.3 cm (6’7 1/4” x 40 1/4”). National Palace Museum, Taipei. Yan Liben, The Thirteen Emperors Tang dynasty Second half of the 7th century Ink and color on silk 51.3 x 531 cm (20 3/16 x 209 1/16 in.) Museum of Fine Arts, Boston Guo Xi.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Modes of the Development of Chinese Ancient Civilization: On
    Two Modes of the Development of Chinese Ancient Civilization: on Observing of the Funeral Jades Unearthed from Large Graves of Hongshan Culture, Liangzhu Culture, and Yangshao Culture Two Modes of the Development of Chinese Ancient Civilization: on Observing of the Funeral Jades Unearthed from Large Graves of Hongshan Culture, Liangzhu Culture, and Yangshao Culture Li Boqian* Key words: Ancient Civilization–China Hongshan Culture Liangzhu Culture Yangshao Culture Burials Jades In the late Neolithic Age, ca. 5500–4500 BP, the as- of Archaeology in Liaoning 1986) and Guo Dashun’s pects of archaeological cultures in Chinese continent account in his article (1997), dozens of burials in cists underwent great changes. Various traces show that so- have been revealed in stone barrows at the Localities II, cial structure in those times was also in an intensive trans- III and V. Every barrow contains at least one major burial formation from the old to the new, and the process of in a large-sized elaborate pit and with rich grave goods, civilization entered a critical period. But the types, con- generally comprising exclusively jades, even pottery tents and major fields of change were diverse among seldom seen, which is clearly different from the tombs regions and cultures, which may have reflected still at other Hongshan Culture settlements. For example, in deeper issues involving different modes of the civiliza- Barrow-1 of Locality II at Niuheliang, a sleeve-shaped tion process. In this paper I will put forward my ideas jade was revealed beneath the tomb occupant’s skull of based on a comparison of the funeral jades from large- Burial M4, two pig-dragon-shaped jade ornaments side sized tombs of the Hongshan, Liangzhu and Yangshao by side on the chest; a hooked-cloud-shaped jade on the Cultures.
    [Show full text]
  • Power Animals and Symbols of Political Authority in Ancient Chinese Jades and Bronzes
    Securing the Harmony between the High and the Low: Power Animals and Symbols of Political Authority in Ancient Chinese Jades and Bronzes RUI OLIVEIRA LOPES introduction One of the issues that has given rise to lengthy discussions among art historians is that of the iconographic significance of Chinese Neolithic jade objects and the symbolic value the decorations on bronze vessels might have had during the Shang (c. 1600 –1045 b.c.) and Zhou (1045–256 b.c.) dynasties. Some historians propose that the representations of real and imaginary animals that often decorated bronze vessels bore no specific meaning. The basis of their argument is that there is no reference to them among the oracle bones of the Shang dynasty or any other contem- poraneous written source.1 They therefore suggest that these were simply decorative elements that had undergone a renovation of style in line with an updating of past ornamental designs, or through stylistic influence resulting from contact with other peoples from western and southern China ( Bagley 1993; Loehr 1953). Others, basing their arguments on the Chinese Classics and other documents of the Eastern Zhou and Han periods, perceive in the jades and bronzes representations of celestial beings who played key roles in communicating with ancestral spirits (Allan 1991, 1993; Chang 1981; Kesner 1991). The transfer of knowledge that determined the continuity of funerary practices, ritual procedures, artistic techniques, and the transmission of the meanings of iconographic representations was certainly subject to some change, but would have been kept in the collective memory and passed on from generation to generation until it was recorded in the most important documents regarding the insti- tutions of Chinese culture.
    [Show full text]