Liangzhu International Scientific Committees, Members and (China) Independent Experts

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Liangzhu International Scientific Committees, Members and (China) Independent Experts Consultations and Technical Evaluation Mission Desk reviews have been provided by ICOMOS Liangzhu International Scientific Committees, members and (China) independent experts. No 1592 An ICOMOS technical evaluation mission visited the property from 19 to 24 September 2018. Additional information received by ICOMOS An Interim Report was provided to the State Party on Official name as proposed by the State Party 21 December 2018, summarising the issues identified by Archaeological Ruins of Liangzhu City the ICOMOS World Heritage Panel. Location Further information was requested in the Interim Report Yuhang District, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province. including boundaries of the buffer zone, legal protection, conservation, management and research. Brief description The nominated property includes the archaeological Additional information was received from the State Party on remains of Liangzhu City (ca. 3300-2300 BCE) which was 2 February 2019 and has been incorporated into the once the centre of power and belief of an early regional relevant sections of this evaluation report. state in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River in Late Neolithic China. Located in the eastern foothills of the Date of ICOMOS approval of this report Tianmu Mountains in a plain criss-crossed by a network of 13 March 2019 rivers, the nominated property consists of four component parts: the Area of Yaoshan Site; the Area of High-dam at the Mouth of the Valley; the Area of Low-dam on the Plain – Causeway in Front of the Mountains; and the Area of City 2 Description of the property Site. Note: The nomination dossier and additional information contain detailed descriptions of this property, its history and its state of The property testifies to the existence of a regional state conservation. Due to limitations on the length of evaluation with a unified belief system and supported economically by reports, this report only provides a short summary of the most rice-cultivating agriculture in late Neolithic China. It also relevant aspects. represents an early urban civilisation with complex functions and structures. Description and history The Archaeological Ruins of Liangzhu City are located on The sites of the Archaeological Ruins of Liangzhu City were a plain crossed by river networks in the eastern foothills of partially discovered in 1936 and since then have been the Tianmu Mountains in the Yangtze River Basin on the excavated, researched, conserved, then presented or southeast coast of China. reburied. The nominated property consists of four component parts: Category of property In terms of categories of cultural property set out in Article I The Area of Yaoshan Site (also called Yaoshan Cemetery) of the 1972 World Heritage Convention, this is a serial is located on top of a hill outside the city and contains the nomination of four sites. Yaoshan Altar (a sacrificial site) and the Yaoshan cemetery, with two rows of tombs. Hundreds of objects, including jade artefacts, have been unearthed from the 1 Basic data cemetery. This component part covers an area of 66.56 ha. The remains date from ca. 3300-3100 BCE, an early period Included in the Tentative List of the Liangzhu culture. 29 January 2013 The Area of High-dam at the Mouth of the Valley is located The property was included in the Tentative List as a single approximately 11 km northwest of the City Site and consists site, including only the fourth component part of the of six artificial dam sites with residual heights of no more current nomination, the Area of City Site, under criteria (ii), than 15 metres and a series of natural ridges and peaks (iv), and (vi). directly associated with them. It covers an area of 136.41 ha. The area is believed to have been built ca. 3100-2850 Background BCE and was continuously in use until ca. 2600 BCE. This is a new nomination. The Area of Low-dam on the Plain - Causeway in Front of the Mountains is located to the north and west of the City Site, and consists of four artificial dams, which form a water storage system with a length of approximately 2.4 km, and 112 the Causeway in front of the Mountains (also known as the significance as a representative of an ancient rice- Tangshan Site), containing composite dams extending for cultivating civilization. 5 km, with widths varying from twenty to fifty metres. This component part covers an area of 349.24 ha and is The State Party submitted additional information in believed to have been built ca. 3000 to 2600 BCE. February 2019, detailing the origins and archaeological records concerning rice cultivation in the middle and lower The Area of City Site, built mainly between ca. 3000 and reaches of the Yangtze River. Liangzhu culture is a pioneer 2850 BCE, is composed of the palace area, inner city, outer in terms of rice cultivation techniques, on a large scale for city, and a series of socially-graded cemeteries; the natural the management of rice resources. It was the regional topographic elements directly associated with them, and centre of an agrarian economy. three main ancient river courses, are also included within the site. This component covers an area of 881.45 ha. The The nominated property remained as ruins from ca. 2300- City Site was continuously in use until 2300 BCE. 2100 BCE. In 1936, the archaeologist Xin’geng discovered the site and conducted excavations after he found black Liangzhu City was the capital and power centre of the pottery representative of the Neolithic period. In 1959 the whole Liangzhu society. It is not located in the geographic site was named ‘Liangzhu Culture’. Further excavations, centre of the Liangzhu cultural area for strategic reasons discoveries and research have been undertaken since the such as transport, water conservancy, agriculture, 1980s, up to 2016. mountain resources and flood risk. Boundaries According to the latest analysis of Carbon-14 dating, The area of the four components totals 1,433.66 ha, with Liangzhu City was built and occupied ca. 3300-2300 BCE a buffer zone of 9,980.29 ha. and abandoned by ca. 2100 BCE. Its rise and decline may be divided into the following 4 periods, according to current The entirety of the area of Yaoshan Site (component 01), research. the Causeway in Front of the Mountains (part of component 03) and the entirety of the Area of City Site (component 04) The first period is ca. 3300-3100 BCE (the early period): the are located within protection zones as stipulated in the early inhabitants of Liangzhu were active over a large area, Conservation Master Plan for the Liangzhu Archaeological with Daxiongshan Hill at the centre; high-grade cemeteries Site, as National Priority Protected Sites. were built. The Area of High-dam at the Mouth of the Valley The second period is ca. 3100-2850 BCE (the middle (component 02) and the Area of Low-dam on the Plain (part period): ca. 3000-2850 BCE was the critical period for the of component 03) are located within protection zones, as establishment of Liangzhu City - the Peripheral Water specified in the Delimitation Scheme of Protection Zone Conservancy System, terraces at Mojiaoshan and and Construction Control Zone for the Periphery Water surrounding areas, the Zhongjiagang water system and Conservancy Project Site of Liangzhu Ancient City, as surrounding highland settlements (including Outer City Provincial Protected Sites of Zhejiang. settlements), and Fanshan and other high-grade cemeteries were built. It was also the key period for urban The boundaries of the four component parts are delineated development with a consciousness of functional zoning of taking into consideration roads and natural features such urban planning. as river systems and hills. The third period is ca. 2850-2600 BCE (the earlier stage of One buffer zone surrounds the four component parts of the the late period): highland settlements began to form in nominated property. It includes surrounding groups of sites Bianjiashan Terrace and Meirendi Terrace and around and parts of the surrounding landscape that are of Mojiaoshan Terrace; the ancient river courses represented supporting value to the property. The delineation of the by the Zhongjiagang River and dam system were both still buffer zone is based on the Construction Control Zone in use; the high-grade cemeteries were continually being stipulated by the Conservation Master Plan for the added to and used. According to the dating of the stratum Liangzhu Archaeological Site and the protection zoning of of the bedded stones at the bottom of the Inner City walls, the Delimitation Scheme of Protection Zone and these walls were already under construction and/or in use. Construction Control Zone for Periphery Water Conservancy Project Site of Liangzhu Ancient City. The fourth period is ca. 2600-2300 BCE (the later stage of the late period): the area within the city walls of Liangzhu ICOMOS considers that the boundaries of the four City and the surrounding terraces (such as Meirendi component parts are well delineated and include the City Terrace) were still in use as settlements; the dam system Site, the Periphery Water Conservancy System, the might have been abandoned by this time. socially-graded cemeteries, various archaeological artefacts and the related natural topographic elements, all In its Interim Report, ICOMOS requested more information, of which are the features expressing the proposed if available, on the state of research pertaining to rice Outstanding Universal Value. cultivation and rice typologies in relation to the relevant components of the nominated property, given its 113 ICOMOS considers the boundaries of the buffer zone result of twenty years of rapid urbanization and population adequate. However, ICOMOS noted a discrepancy growth. Steps are being taken by the State Party to shut between the boundaries of the buffer zone and the down quarries, and to move factories and large boundaries of the protection zones (the Construction manufacturing units outside the nominated property.
Recommended publications
  • Standardization of Chinese Local History Compilations
    Submitted on: 11.09.2019 Title of the Satellite Meeting: Local History and Genealogy Satellite Meeting 2019 Date: 21-22 August 2019 Location: University library “Svetozar Marković”, Belgrade, Serbia Standardization of Chinese Local History Compilations Qiu Xinli [email protected] Zhou Youngjin [email protected] Copyright © 2019 by Qiu Xinli and Zhou Youngjin. This work is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Abstract: There is a close racial relationship between Taiwan’s aborigines and New Zealand’s Māori people. During process of immigration from Taiwan to New Zealand, revealing the two races connected. Through evidence of the words “Genealogy”, “Whakapapa” “Family Chronicles” which have similarity but also differences. The language differences existed but in what extent the differences are. The major objective of this study is to compare the differences among these concepts of whakapapa, genealogy and family chronicles to explore the meanings beyond these three words. Authors retrieved Māori and related literature to find out the differences. The difficulties came from that aborigines did not have archives or written records of the history. However, there are not sufficient information available. With limited information, authors extract valuable concept worth further exploration. Authors suggest that public libraries of these two area should systematically collect related information. The other suggestion is to produce oral history of local aborigines in order to maintain the language heritage and cultural development. Keywords: Traditional Chinese Historiography, Local History, Chinese Local Chronicle, Standardized Management I. Introduction The archaeological ruins of Liangzhu City in Hangzhou, China, was officially included on the World Heritage List at the 43rd World Heritage Conference held in Baku, Azerbaijani, on July 6, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Ceramic's Influence on Chinese Bronze Development
    Ceramic’s Influence on Chinese Bronze Development Behzad Bavarian and Lisa Reiner Dept. of MSEM College of Engineering and Computer Science September 2007 Photos on cover page Jue from late Shang period decorated with Painted clay gang with bird, fish and axe whorl and thunder patterns and taotie design from the Neolithic Yangshao creatures, H: 20.3 cm [34]. culture, H: 47 cm [14]. Flat-based jue from early Shang culture Pou vessel from late Shang period decorated decorated with taotie beasts. This vessel with taotie creatures and thunder patterns, H: is characteristic of the Erligang period, 24.5 cm [34]. H: 14 cm [34]. ii Table of Contents Abstract Approximate timeline 1 Introduction 2 Map of Chinese Provinces 3 Neolithic culture 4 Bronze Development 10 Clay Mold Production at Houma Foundry 15 Coins 16 Mining and Smelting at Tonglushan 18 China’s First Emperor 19 Conclusion 21 References 22 iii The transition from the Neolithic pottery making to the emergence of metalworking around 2000 BC held significant importance for the Chinese metal workers. Chinese techniques sharply contrasted with the Middle Eastern and European bronze development that relied on annealing, cold working and hammering. The bronze alloys were difficult to shape by hammering due to the alloy combination of the natural ores found in China. Furthermore, China had an abundance of clay and loess materials and the Chinese had spent the Neolithic period working with and mastering clay, to the point that it has been said that bronze casting was made possible only because the bronze makers had access to superior ceramic technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Originally, the Descendants of Hua Xia Were Not the Descendants of Yan Huang
    E-Leader Brno 2019 Originally, the Descendants of Hua Xia were not the Descendants of Yan Huang Soleilmavis Liu, Activist Peacepink, Yantai, Shandong, China Many Chinese people claimed that they are descendants of Yan Huang, while claiming that they are descendants of Hua Xia. (Yan refers to Yan Di, Huang refers to Huang Di and Xia refers to the Xia Dynasty). Are these true or false? We will find out from Shanhaijing ’s records and modern archaeological discoveries. Abstract Shanhaijing (Classic of Mountains and Seas ) records many ancient groups of people in Neolithic China. The five biggest were: Yan Di, Huang Di, Zhuan Xu, Di Jun and Shao Hao. These were not only the names of groups, but also the names of individuals, who were regarded by many groups as common male ancestors. These groups first lived in the Pamirs Plateau, soon gathered in the north of the Tibetan Plateau and west of the Qinghai Lake and learned from each other advanced sciences and technologies, later spread out to other places of China and built their unique ancient cultures during the Neolithic Age. The Yan Di’s offspring spread out to the west of the Taklamakan Desert;The Huang Di’s offspring spread out to the north of the Chishui River, Tianshan Mountains and further northern and northeastern areas;The Di Jun’s and Shao Hao’s offspring spread out to the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River, where the Di Jun’s offspring lived in the west of the Shao Hao’s territories, which were near the sea or in the Shandong Peninsula.Modern archaeological discoveries have revealed the authenticity of Shanhaijing ’s records.
    [Show full text]
  • The Zhuan Xupeople Were the Founders of Sanxingdui Culture and Earliest Inhabitants of South Asia
    E-Leader Bangkok 2018 The Zhuan XuPeople were the Founders of Sanxingdui Culture and Earliest Inhabitants of South Asia Soleilmavis Liu, Author, Board Member and Peace Sponsor Yantai, Shangdong, China Shanhaijing (Classic of Mountains and Seas) records many ancient groups of people (or tribes) in Neolithic China. The five biggest were: Zhuan Xu, Di Jun, Huang Di, Yan Di and Shao Hao.However, the Zhuan Xu People seemed to have disappeared when the Yellow and Chang-jiang river valleys developed into advanced Neolithic cultures. Where had the Zhuan Xu People gone? Abstract: Shanhaijing (Classic of Mountains and Seas) records many ancient groups of people in Neolithic China. The five biggest were: Zhuan Xu, Di Jun, Huang Di, Yan Di and Shao Hao. These were not only the names of individuals, but also the names of groups who regarded them as common male ancestors. These groups used to live in the Pamirs Plateau, later spread to other places of China and built their unique ancient cultures during the Neolithic Age. Shanhaijing reveals Zhuan Xu’s offspring lived near the Tibetan Plateau in their early time. They were the first who entered the Tibetan Plateau, but almost perished due to the great environment changes, later moved to the south. Some of them entered the Sichuan Basin and became the founders of Sanxingdui Culture. Some of them even moved to the south of the Tibetan Plateau, living near the sea. Modern archaeological discoveries have revealed the authenticity of Shanhaijing ’s records. Keywords: Shanhaijing; Neolithic China, Zhuan Xu, Sanxingdui, Ancient Chinese Civilization Introduction Shanhaijing (Classic of Mountains and Seas) records many ancient groups of people in Neolithic China.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Studies in Large-Scale Archaeological Site Conservation and Management in China: the Liangzhu, Yin Xu, and Han Yangling Sites
    CASE STUDIES IN LARGE-SCALE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT IN CHINA: THE LIANGZHU, YIN XU, AND HAN YANGLING SITES Estudos de caso sobre conservação e gestão de sítios arqueológicos de grande escala na China: Os sítios Liangzhu, Yin Xu e Han Yangling Dongdong Wang * Shin’ichi Nakamura** ABSTRACT Conservation of what are termed large-scale archaeological sites in China has been undertaken since the turn of the twenty-first century due to increasing threats posed by natural disasters and urbanization, as well as the needs to display and utilize these archaeological sites. Changing administrative structures and new approaches to conserving and utilizing large-scale sites are attempting to address these threats and needs. This paper presents a classification of these large-scale sites, as well as three typical cases for a detailed discussion. Using published literature and field surveys, this study addresses two main issues. The first issue is how governmental agencies adjust current organizations and mechanisms in order to satisfy the social, ecological, and economic requirements of a project. The second issue is how governmental agencies identify the responsibilities of different stakeholders in relation to the conservation of archaeological sites within the context of local development. Keywords: Chinese Large-Scale Archaeological Site; heritage site conservation; site management and mechanisms; stakeholders; local development * Doctoral Student, Kanazawa University, Japan. 920-1192, Kakumamachi, Kanazawa City, Ishikawa Prefecture, Japan. E-mail: [email protected] ** Professor at Faculty of Letters, Institute of Human and Social Sciences. Kanazawa University, Japan. 920-1192, Kakumamachi, Kanazawa City, Ishikawa Prefecture, Japan. História: Questões & Debates, Curitiba, volume 66, n.1, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Report
    World Heritage 43 COM WHC/19/43.COM/19 Paris, 10 July 2019 Original: English UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE Forty-third session Baku, Republic of Azerbaijan 30 June – 10 July 2019 REPORT Decisions adopted during the 43rd session of the World Heritage Committee (Baku, 2019) Part 2 (Decisions 43 COM 8 to 43 COM 17) DRAFT 8. Establishment of the World Heritage List and of the List of World Heritage in Danger 8. Nomination Process Draft Decision: 43 COM 8 The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC/19/43.COM/8, 2. Recalling Decision 42 COM 8 adopted at its 42nd session (Manama, 2018), 3. Reaffirming the overriding necessity to continue to work towards bringing greater convergence between the decisions taken by the Committee and the recommendations of the Advisory Bodies; 4. Expresses its appreciation for the work of the ad-hoc Working Group, the experts that have participated to the Tunis Meeting, the Advisory Bodies and the World Heritage Centre for their work on the ongoing reflection on the revision of the nomination process; 5. Also recalling that the Operational Guidelines set out the conditions for inscription on the World Heritage List, strongly reiterates that only meeting criteria is not enough to warrant inscription, as to be deemed of Outstanding Universal Value a site must also meet the conditions of integrity (and authenticity) and must have an adequate protection and management system to ensure its safeguarding, as outlined in paragraph 78 of the Operational Guidelines; 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Jade Huang and Chinese Culture Identity: Focus on the Myth of “Huang of Xiahoushi”
    Journal of Literature and Art Studies, June 2016, Vol. 6, No. 6, 603-618 doi: 10.17265/2159-5836/2016.06.003 D DAVID PUBLISHING Jade Huang and Chinese Culture Identity: Focus on the Myth of “Huang of Xiahoushi” TANG Qi-cui, WU Yu-wei Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China This paper focus on the myth of “Huang of Xiahoushi” (夏后氏之璜), focusing on the distribution of Jade Huang (玉璜) since the early neolithic and its process of pluralistic integration. The paper explores the story of ethnic group, cultural identification and the significance of Jade Huang in the discourse construction of etiquette civilization behind the mythic narrative based on multi-evidence method and the local meaning of literature in ancient Chinese context. Keywords: Jade Huang, Huang of Xiahoushi, unified diversity, Chinese identity, etiquette civilization, multi-evidence method Introduction Modern archeological relics including potteries, jades and bronzes bring back the lost history; the process of how Chinese unified diversity took shape in general and the great tradition of jade culture in eight thousand in particular. The handed-down documents echo each other at a distance provide solid evidences for the origin of civilization of rite and music and the core values based on jade belief. Jade Huang is an important one of it. It is illuminated by numerous records about Jade Huang in ancient literature, as well as a large number of archaeology findings past 7,000 years. The paper seeks to focus on the following questions: what is the function of Jade Huang in historic and prehistoric period? Moreover, what is the function of “Huang of Xiahoushi”, which belonged to emperor and symbolized special power in historic documents and myths and legends in ancient china? Jade Huang: Etiquette and Literature Jade Huang (Yu Huang, Semi-circular/annular Jade Pendant) is a type of jade artifact which is seemed to be remotely related to etiquette and literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Hangzhou Silk”
    Asian Social Science; Vol. 13, No. 5; 2017 ISSN 1911-2017 E-ISSN 1911-2025 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education The Meaning and Evolution of the Name “Hangzhou Silk” Xiangyang Bian1, Aijuan Cao1,2 & Dongmao Ren3 1 Fashion & Art Design Institute, Donghua University, Shanghai, China 2 Highfashion Womenwear Institute of Hangzhou Vocational & Technical College, Hangzhou, China; 3 Former Hangzhou Silk Industry Association, Hangzhou, China Correspondence: Bian Xiangyang, Fashion & Art Design Institute, Donghua University, Shanghai, NO.1882, West Yan-an Road, 200051, China. Tel: 86-21-6237-3978. E-mail: [email protected] Received: March 6, 2017 Accepted: March 29, 2017 Online Published: April 19, 2017 doi:10.5539/ass.v13n5p131 URL: https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v13n5p131 Abstract With regard to the meaning and evolution of "Hangzhou Silk", the author uses the documentary research methodology to trim and verify from three aspects of industry name, product name and brand name respectively, attempting to find out the source of "Hangzhou Silk" from historical documents. Research shows that, as the industry name being called as "Hangzhou satin industry" or "Hangzhou silk weaving industry", it was generally called as the "Hangzhou Silk and Satin Industry” after the combination of Hangzhou Silk Reeling Industry Association and Hangzhou Silk Weaving Industry Association until 1952. As the product name being called as "Hangzhou silk” or “Hangzhou satin", it was called as “Hangzhou silk “after the China liberation. As the brand name, it referred to the specific silk products of Hangzhou region in particular after being awarded of protection as Chinese national geographical mark product since September 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Netsuke Latest Acquisitions
    HANSHAN TANG BOOKS • L IST 183 NEW PUBLICATIONS EXCAVATED CHINESE CERAMICS NETSUKE LATEST ACQUISITIONS H ANSHAN TANG B OOKS LTD Unit 3, Ashburton Centre 276 Cortis Road London SW 15 3 AY UK Tel (020) 8788 4464 Fax (020) 8780 1565 Int’l (+44 20) [email protected] www.hanshan.com CONTENTS N EW & R ECENT P UBLICATIONS / 3 E XCAVATED C HINESE C ERAMICS / 11 N ETSUKE / 23 F ROM O UR S TOCK / 27 S UBJECT I NDEX / 64 T E R M S The books advertised in this list are antiquarian, second-hand or new publications. All books listed are in mint or good condition unless otherwise stated. If an out-of-print book listed here has already been sold, we will keep a record of your order and, when we acquire another copy, we will offer it to you. If a book is in print but not immediately available, it will be sent when new stock arrives. We will inform you when a book is not available. Prices take account of condition; they are net and exclude postage. Please note that we have occasional problems with publishers increasing the prices of books on the actual date of publication or supply. For secondhand items, we set the prices in this list. However, for new books we must reluctantly reserve the right to alter our advertised prices in line with any suppliers’ increases. P O S TA L C H A RG E S & D I S PATC H United Kingdom: For books weighing over 700 grams, minimum postage within the UK is GB £12.00.
    [Show full text]
  • The Neolithic Ofsouthern China-Origin, Development, and Dispersal
    The Neolithic ofSouthern China-Origin, Development, and Dispersal ZHANG CHI AND HSIAO-CHUN HUNG INTRODUCTION SANDWICHED BETWEEN THE YELLOW RIVER and Mainland Southeast Asia, southern China1 lies centrally within eastern Asia. This geographical area can be divided into three geomorphological terrains: the middle and lower Yangtze allu­ vial plain, the Lingnan (southern Nanling Mountains)-Fujian region,2 and the Yungui Plateau3 (Fig. 1). During the past 30 years, abundant archaeological dis­ coveries have stimulated a rethinking of the role ofsouthern China in the prehis­ tory of China and Southeast Asia. This article aims to outline briefly the Neolithic cultural developments in the middle and lower Yangtze alluvial plain, to discuss cultural influences over adjacent regions and, most importantly, to examine the issue of southward population dispersal during this time period. First, we give an overview of some significant prehistoric discoveries in south­ ern China. With the discovery of Hemudu in the mid-1970s as the divide, the history of archaeology in this region can be divided into two phases. The first phase (c. 1920s-1970s) involved extensive discovery, when archaeologists un­ earthed Pleistocene human remains at Yuanmou, Ziyang, Liujiang, Maba, and Changyang, and Palaeolithic industries in many caves. The major Neolithic cul­ tures, including Daxi, Qujialing, Shijiahe, Majiabang, Songze, Liangzhu, and Beiyinyangying in the middle and lower Yangtze, and several shell midden sites in Lingnan, were also discovered in this phase. During the systematic research phase (1970s to the present), ongoing major ex­ cavation at many sites contributed significantly to our understanding of prehis­ toric southern China. Additional early human remains at Wushan, Jianshi, Yun­ xian, Nanjing, and Hexian were recovered together with Palaeolithic assemblages from Yuanmou, the Baise basin, Jianshi Longgu cave, Hanzhong, the Li and Yuan valleys, Dadong and Jigongshan.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Rice Farmers Don't Sail: Coastal Subsistence Traditions and Maritime Trends in Early China
    Qin, Ling and Dorian Q Fuller (in press) Why Rice Farmers Don’t Sail: Coastal Subsistence Traditions and Maritime Trends in Early China. In: Prehistoric Maritime Culture and Seafaring of East Asia: A Multidisciplinary recognition of the origin of Maritime Silk Road (eds. Chunming Wu, Barry V. Rolett). Springer 1 2 3 Chapter 9 4 Why Rice Farmers Don’t Sail: Coastal Subsistence 5 Traditions and Maritime Trends in Early China 6 7 8 Ling Qin and Dorian Q. Fuller 9 10 11 12 13 9.1 Introduction 14 15 The emergence of agriculture had a profound effect on environments and human 16 populations. Its transformative effect has been explored in global syntheses from 17 Diamond (1997) to Ellis (2015), and in terms of human macro-history farming clearly 18 played a role in increasing the potential rates of demographic growth and the expansion 19 of human populations, language families and genetic lineages (Bellwood 2004, 2005). 20 The so-called Language-Farming dispersal model suggests that the demographic 21 transition triggered by the emergence of agriculture led to population growth and 22 outward migration of farming populations and accounts for most of the geographical 23 spread of major modern language families (Bellwood and Renfrew 2003; Diamond and 24 Bellwood 2003). In the context of both mainland and island Southeast Asia, most of the 25 distribution of different language families has been attributed to this process, either 26 directly or indirectly. Thus mainland Southeast Asian languages like Austroasiatic can 27 be traced back to the spread of rice farmers southwards out of China (e.g., Higham ________________________ Ling Qin () School of Archaeology and Museology, Peking University Beijing, China e-mail: [email protected] Dorian Q.
    [Show full text]
  • ASEM Seminar on Single Window Cooperation
    INFORMATION NOTE ASEM Seminar on Single Window Cooperation 29th - 31st October, 2019 Deefly Zhejiang Hotel, Hangzhou, China ASEM Seminar on Single Window Cooperation 1. PURPOSE 1.1 This information note provides general information on the arrangements for the ASEM Seminar on Single Window Cooperation, which will be held in Hangzhou, China. 2. DATES & VENUE 2.1 The ASEM Seminar on Single Window Cooperation will be held from 29th to 31st October, 2019 at Deefly Zhejiang Hotel (Add: No. 278, San Tai Shan Road) Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China. Deefly Zhejiang Hotel is located in the famous West Lake resort area. 3. REGISTRATION OF DELEGATES 3.1 All delegates are kindly requested to fill in the registration form attached herewith and send it back to China Customs’ contact persons. 4. CONTACT INFORMATION 4.1 Inquiries relating to the agenda of the seminar, delegate registration, logistical arrangements and organizational matters should be directed to: Mr. QIN Da Tel. No.: +86-10-65195495 Mob. No.: +86-18304798855 E-mail: [email protected]; Mr. HU Li Tel. No.:+86-10-65195935 Mob. No.: +86-15888100566 E-mail: [email protected]. 5. SEMINAR PACKAGE 5.1 Morning tea and afternoon tea will be provided during the three-day Seminar. 5.2 The official welcome dinner will be held at Deefly Zhejiang Hotel on Tuesday 29 Oct., 2019. 5.3 Please note that halal food will also be provided besides traditional Chinese delicacies. 6. DRESS CODE 6.1 Delegates and observers are kindly requested to come in formal attire during the Seminar. 7. PASSPORT & VISA 7.1 All international delegates are required to enter and leave China with a valid passport issued by or on behalf of the Government of a country of which he or she is a national or citizen.
    [Show full text]