______2020/SOM1/CTI/A2C2/006

Coordinated Border Management in and Global Trends

Submitted by: WCO

Tenth APEC Alliance for Supply Chain Connectivity Meeting Putrajaya, Malaysia 10 February 2020

V

CBM Finland Case & Global Trends

Tenth Meeting of the APEC Alliance for Supply Armen Manukyan Chain Connectivity (A2C2)

Technical Attaché February 10, 2019 Compliance and Facilitation Directorate

www.wcoomd.org © 2019 World Organization (WCO) 1 Coordinated Border Management in Finland

Inter-departmental cooperation Police, Customs and (PCB) cooperation

www.wcoomd.org CBM Case Finland (presented by Mika Poutiainen) 2 Finnish Customs Background • Legal background already since 1927; • Incremental development (Decrees in 1949,1978 & 2001); • Current legal base: Act and Government Decree on Cooperation between PCB- authorities (2009) • Agreements – Trilateral agreement and bilateral agreements signed by heads of agencies; • PCB strategy 2015 – 2018

Finnish Customs SHARED COMPETENCE

POLICE

Public Traffic order and control CUSTOMS safety Customs Crime prevention security Control of aliens Customs and patrolling control and related to public border checks order and safety

Exclusive powers BORDER GUARD Primary/secondary Border security powers Overlapping powers

Finnish Customs PCB cooperation in general matters

• Common ICT-solutions – Domestic investigation database – Access to each others criminal intelligence databases – Common criminal analyses tools • Purchasing of material together • Education & training – Common education – Providing right to study in each others courses

Finnish Customs Different forms of cooperation

• Passport control at airports and harbors • Customs duties at temporary border posts • Police duties at BCPs • Pilot project in northern and eastern Finland – Harva

Finnish Customs Role of Customs in enforcement cooperation Ministry Finance Tax Administration Export controls, corporate audits, grey economy

Interior Police Crime prevention, LIPRE Border Guard Passport controls, weapons, cash Transport and Finnish Transport Safety Agency (Trafi) Controls of heavy traffic Communications Safety measures at ports

Agriculture and Food Safety Authority (Evira) FEOGA, food products Forestry Agency for Rural Affairs (Mavi) Plant and animal diseases

Foreign Affairs Department for External Economic Dual use products including weapons of mass destruction Relations, Political Department International trade regulations, e.g. customs value and provenance Social Affairs Medicines Agency (Fimea) Medicines and Health Supervisory Authority for Welfare and Health (Valvira) Alcohol, tobacco Radiation Safety Authority (STUK) Radioactive materials Education Copyright organisations Copyrights Board of Antiquities Objects of cultural value Environment Environmental Administration (SYKE) Waste, chemicals, CITES Oil Pollution Compensation Fund Oil damage duty Employment and Safety Technology Authority (Tukes) Chemicals, consumer goods, explosives the Economy Board of Patents and Registration Intellectual property rights

Defence Ministry of Defence Defence materiel

Finnish Customs The Nuija Model

at Nuijamaa BCP

Finnish Customs 8

2 1

4

3 5

6

7

Nuijamaa border crossing point 1. Cargo traffic centre 2. Passenger traffic centre 3. X-ray 4. Weight control 5. Inspection hall 6. Seizured vehicles 7. Parking area for trucks 8. Border to Russia

Finnish Customs Finland – Norway – Sweden Border cooperation between Norway, Sweden and Finland the domestic border authorities of each economy are allowed to provide services and exercise legal powers not only on behalf of their home state, but that of their neighbouring states as well. Swedish–Norwegian Border • Already in 1959, Norway and Sweden signed a customs co- operation agreement aimed at facilitating border crossing, simplifying customs controls and clearance procedures. • Both economies have been members of the Schengen Area • Only Sweden is EU Member • Export from Sweden and Import to Norway are done by Norwegian Customs • Import to Sweden and export from Norway are done by Swedish Customs

Finnish Customs 11 Automated number plates recognition system was integrated in Baltics 2013

12 Average & Median Relevant Stakeholders Number involved (CBRAs/PGAs) in a Single Window Environment

WCO AP region, which includes most of APEC Member economies, and EUR regions have the highest and the lowest average numbers of regulatory agencies respectively (denoted by the red rhombuses inside the boxplots).

AP region has as well, both the highest interquartile range and the largest amplitude (determined by the length of the horizontal black line passing through the box).

www.wcoomd.org Regulatory Areas Covered by SWE/ACE Most common stakeholders and regulatory areas involved in a Single Window environment

The number of the stakeholders and formalities covered by an SW environment can be an appropriate indicator of coordination level on cross border checkpoints. Efficiencies of frontend procedures, services are directly related to the backend coordination with all the relevant stakeholders as well. The diagram lists only the most common ones, while the responses provided a vast diversity of Agencies involved in the SW environment.

www.wcoomd.org V

Armen Manukyan Technical Attaché Compliance and Facilitation Directorate E-mail [email protected]

www.wcoomd.org 15