DOCSLIB.ORG

2006 San Francisco Estuary Invasive Spartina Control Program Schedule Updated: 9/7/06

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2006 San Francisco Estuary Invasive Spartina Control Program Schedule Updated: 9/7/06 2006 San Francisco Estuary Invasive Spartina Control Program Schedule Updated: 9/7/06 More information on: Treatment Methods Imazapyr Site Locations Treatment Location Treatment Method Imazapyr Herbicide Manual Covering with Sub-Area Spartina Acres Amphibious Aerial: Aerial: Manual Site # Site Name Sub-Area Name County Treatment date Truck Backpack Boat Geotextile Excavation Number to be Treated vehicle Broadcast Spray Ball Digging Fabric 1 Alameda Flood Control 01a Channel Mouth Alameda 7.92 7/24-7/25/2006 XX Channel Lower Channel (not 01b Alameda 40.7 XX including mouth) 7/24-7/25/2006 01c Upper Channel Alameda 15.4 7/24-7/25/2006 XX Upper Channel - Union City 01d Blvd to I-880 Alameda 9.9 XX 7/24/2006 Strip Marsh No. of Channel 01e Mouth Alameda 3.52 X 7/24-7/25/2006 01f Pond 3-AFCC Alameda 5.83 7/24-7/25/2006 XX 2 Bair/Greco Islands Belmont Slough/Island, North Point, Bird Island, 02a San Mateo 3.36 XX Steinberger Slough/ Redwood Shores 8/8-8/11/06 Steinberger Slough South, Corkscrew Slough, 02b Redwood Creek North San Mateo 4.24 XXX 9/7-9/8/06 02c B2 North Quadrant San Mateo 19.64 8/08-8/11/2006 XX B2 South Quadrant - 02d San Mateo 8.8 X Rookery 8/08-8/11/2006 02e West Point Slough NW San Mateo 1.38 9/7-9/8/06 XX 02f Greco Island North San Mateo 2.04 8/8-8/11/2006 X West Point Slough SW and 02g San Mateo 0.44 X East 9/7-9/8/06 02h Greco Island South San Mateo 4.4 8/08-8/11/2006 X Ravenswood Slough & 02i San Mateo 2.2 XX Mouth 8/08-8/11/2006 Ravenswood Open Space 02j San Mateo 0.66 X Preserve 8/08-8/11/2006 3 Blackie's Creek (above 03a Marin 0.5 X Blackie's Pasture bridge) 9/5/2006 03b Blackie's Creek Mouth Marin 0.06 9/5/2006 X 4 Corte Madera Marsh 04a Marin 0.22 X Reserve September College of Marin Ecological 04b Marin 0.01 X Reserve 7/27/; 9/7/2006 04c Piper Park East Marin 0.01 September X 04d Piper Park West Marin 0.01 September X Larkspur Ferry Landing 04e Marin 0.03 X Area 7/27/2006 Riviera Circle 04f Marin 2.2 XXX 7/27-7/28;8/01/06 Creekside Park Corte Madera Creek 04g Marin 2.75 9/05-9/08/06; X X Complex 9/11-9/13/06 Upper Corte Madera Creek 04h (Above Bon Air Road) Marin 0.14 9/7/06; X 9/28-9/29/06 Lower Corte Madera Creek 04i (Between Bon Air Road & Marin 2.53 X X HWY 101) 9/18-9/20/06 2006 San Francisco Estuary Invasive Spartina Control Program Schedule Updated: 9/7/06 More information on: Treatment Methods Imazapyr Site Locations Treatment Location Treatment Method Imazapyr Herbicide Manual Covering with Sub-Area Spartina Acres Amphibious Aerial: Aerial: Manual Site # Site Name Sub-Area Name County Treatment date Truck Backpack Boat Geotextile Excavation Number to be Treated vehicle Broadcast Spray Ball Digging Fabric Corte Madera Creek Mouth 04j (Downstream of HWY 101) Marin 0.34 X 9/18-9/20/06 Boardwalk No. 1 (Arkites) 04k Marin 0.55 9/28/2006 X X 5 Mowry Marsh-Newark 05a Slough to Calaveras Point Alameda 0.22 X August 05b Dumbarton/Audubon Alameda 3.36 August X Coyote Creek/Mowry 05c Newark Slough Alameda 1.1 August XX Complex 05d LaRiviere Marsh Alameda 1.38 September XX 05e Mayhew's Landing Alameda 0.58 September XX Coyote Creek- Alameda 05f Alameda 1.65 X County August 6 Emeryville Crescent East 06a Alameda 0.03 X 9/20/2006 Emeryville Crescent Emeryville Crescent West 06b Alameda 2.1 10/10/2006 XX 7 07a Oro Loma Marsh-east Alameda 21.75 7/17/2006 XX Oro Loma Marsh 07b Oro Loma Marsh-west Alameda 22 7/17/2006 X 8 Palo Alto Baylands 08a Palo Alto Baylands Santa Clara 0.16 9/6-9/7/2006 X 9 Pickleweed Park 9 Pickleweed Park Marin 0.01 9/8/2006 X 10 10a Whittel Marsh Contra Costa 0.2 9/8/2006 X Point Pinole Marshes 10b Southern Marsh Contra Costa 0.5 9/8/2006 X 11 Southampton Marsh Southampton Marsh 11 Solano 0.14 9/12/2006 X 12 12a Pier 94 San Francisco 0.01 Ongoing X 12b Pier 98/Heron's Head San Francisco 0.01 Ongoing X Southeast San 12c India Basin San Francisco 0.04 August X Franciso Hunters Point Naval 12d San Francisco 1.1 September X Reserve 12e Yosemite Channel San Francisco 2.86 10/6/2006 X 12f Candlestick Cove San Francisco 0.22 10/6/2006 X 13 Old Alameda Creek North 13a Alameda 6.38 7/24/2006 XX Bank Old Alameda Creek Island 13b Alameda 16.28 7/24/2006 X Old Alameda Creek South 13c Alameda 5.39 7/24/2006 XX Whale's Tail Complex Bank 13d Whale's Tail North Fluke Alameda 4.4 7/24/2006 XX 13e Whale's Tail South Fluke Alameda 12.5 7/24/2006 XX 13f Cargill Mitigation Marsh Alameda 8.36 7/24/2006 X Upstream of 20 Tide Gates 13g Alameda 3.3 7/24/2006 X 15 South Bay Marshes South Bay Marshes - Santa 9/6-9/8; 9/11-9/12; 15a Clara County Santa Clara 1.64 9/20-9/22; XX 10/4-10/6/2006 15b Faber/Laumeister Marsh San Mateo 0.01 September X 16 Cooley Landing Salt Cooley Landing 16 San Mateo 5.2 August XX Pond Restoration 2006 San Francisco Estuary Invasive Spartina Control Program Schedule Updated: 9/7/06 More information on: Treatment Methods Imazapyr Site Locations Treatment Location Treatment Method Imazapyr Herbicide Manual Covering with Sub-Area Spartina Acres Amphibious Aerial: Aerial: Manual Site # Site Name Sub-Area Name County Treatment date Truck Backpack Boat Geotextile Excavation Number to be Treated vehicle Broadcast Spray Ball Digging Fabric 17 Alameda/San Leandro Alameda Island South (Elsie Bay Complex Rohmer Bird Sanctuary, 17a Crown Memorial State Alameda 12.5 September XX Beach, Crab Cove) 17b Bay Farm Alameda 6.5 September X 17c Arrowhead Marsh Alameda 15 7/17/2006 X MLK Regional 17d Shoreline/Garretson Point Alameda 9 9/12; 9/25-26/2006 XX 17e San Leandro Creek Alameda 0.55 August X 17f Oakland Inner Harbor Alameda 7.15 August X 17g Coast Guard Island Alameda 4.95 August X 17h MLK Marsh Alameda 4.5 9/5-6; 9/25/2006 X 17i Coliseum Channels Alameda 3.08 6/28/2006 X 17j Fan Marsh Alameda 3.85 September X 17k Airport Channel Alameda 8.5 9/11/2006 XX Doolittle Pond 17l Alameda 1.7 9/11-12; 9/25/2006 X Alameda Island (East: 17m Aeolian Yacht Club and Alameda 1.21 September X Eastern Shoreline) 18 Colma Creek San 18a Colma Creek San Mateo 3.5 9/4/2006 X Bruno Marsh Complex 18b Navigable Slough San Mateo 1 9/4/2006 X 18c "Old Marina" San Mateo 0 9/4/2006 18d "Inner Harbor" San Mateo 0 9/4/2006 18e Sam Trans Peninsula San Mateo 0 TBD 18f "Confluence Marsh" San Mateo 0 TBD 18g San Bruno Marsh San Mateo 0 9/4/2006 18h San Bruno Creek San Mateo 1.65 9/4/2006 X 19 West San Francisco 19a Brisbane Lagoon San Mateo 5.5 September XX Bay 19b Sierra Point San Mateo 1.65 9/1/2006 X 19c Oyster Cove San Mateo 2.75 9/5/2006 X 19d Oyster Point Marina San Mateo 0.55 9/5/2006 X 19e Oyster Point Park San Mateo 1.65 8/29/2006 X 19f Point San Bruno San Mateo 1.1 8/29/2006 X 19g Seaplane Harbor San Mateo 0.28 8/29/2006 X 19h SFO San Mateo 8.25 8/30/-8/31/2006 X 19i Mills Creek Mouth San Mateo 3.3 8/17-8/18/2006 X 19j Easton Creek Mouth San Mateo 1.1 8/17-8/18/2006 X 19k Sanchez Marsh San Mateo 1.65 8/17-8/18/2006 X 19l Burlingame Lagoon San Mateo 0.28 8/17-8/18/2006 X 19m Fisherman's Park San Mateo 0.13 8/17-8/18/2006 X Coyote Point Marina/Marsh 19n San Mateo 3.96 8/17-8/18/2006 X San Mateo Creek /Ryder 19o San Mateo 0.88 8/17-8/18/2006 X Park 19p Seal Slough Mouth San Mateo 36.5 8/08-8/11/2006 XX Foster City 8/24-8/25, 19q San Mateo 1.1 8/28/2006 X 2006 San Francisco Estuary Invasive Spartina Control Program Schedule Updated: 9/7/06 More information on: Treatment Methods Imazapyr Site Locations Treatment Location Treatment Method Imazapyr Herbicide Manual Covering with Sub-Area Spartina Acres Amphibious Aerial: Aerial: Manual Site # Site Name Sub-Area Name County Treatment date Truck Backpack Boat Geotextile Excavation Number to be Treated vehicle Broadcast Spray Ball Digging Fabric 19r Anza Lagoon San Mateo 1.1 8/14-8/15/2006 X 20 San Leandro/Hayward Oyster Bay Regional 7/17/2006; 20a Alameda 9 XX (7/17) Shoreline Shoreline 9/26/2006 Lew Galbraith Golf Course 20b Alameda 0.13 August X 20c Dog Bone Marsh Alameda 2.75 09/13-09/15/06 X 20d Citation Marsh Alameda 11 09/13-09/15/06 XX 20e East Marsh Alameda 1.1 09/19/-09/21/06 X 20f North Marsh Alameda 5.5 09/13-09/15/06 XX 20g Bunker Marsh Alameda 8 09/19/-09/21/06 XX San Lorenzo Creek & Mouth 20h Alameda 19.8 7/17/2006 X 20i Bockmann Channel Alameda 0.04 August X 20j Sulphur Creek Alameda 0.04 August X 20k Hayward Landing Alameda 0.36 7/17/2006 X 20l Johnson's Landing Alameda 0.8 7/17/2006 X Cogswell Marsh, Quadrant 20m Alameda 30 7/17/2006 X A Cogswell Marsh, Quadrant 20n Alameda 25 7/17/2006 X B Cogswell Marsh, Quadrant 20o Alameda 40 7/17/2006 X C Bayfront Outlier Spartina 20p clones of entire Shoreline Alameda 0.88 7/17/2006 X 21 Ideal Marsh 21a Ideal Marsh North Alameda 13.3 7/24/2006 X 21b Ideal Marsh South Alameda 15.4 7/24/2006 X 22 Two Points Complex 22a Wildcat Marsh Contra Costa 0.22 9/21-22/2006 X 22b San Pablo Marsh Contra Costa 0.11 9/21-22/2006 X 22c Rheem Creek Area Contra Costa 0.11 9/21-22/2006 X 22d Stege Marsh Contra Costa 0.01 9/20/2006 X 22e Hoffman Marsh Contra Costa 0? 9/20/2006 X 23 Marin Outliers 23a Brickyard Cove Marin 0.01 9/8/2006 X 23b Beach Drive Marin 0.01 9/8/2006 X 23c Loch Lomond Marina Marin 0.01 9/8/2006 X San Rafael Canal Mouth 23d Marin 0.01 9/8/2006 X North 23e Martas Marsh Marin 0.69 9/22/2006 X 23f Paradise Cay Marin 1.1 9/22/2006 XX 23g Greenwood Cove Marin 0.01 September X 23h Strawberry Point Marin 0.01 September X 23i Strawberry Cove Marin 0.01 September X 23j Bothin Marsh Marin 0.01 September X 23k Sausalito Marin 0.55 September X.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
    San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan October 2019 Table of Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures.............................................................................................................................. ii Chapter 1: Governance ............................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Governance Team and Structure ...................................................... 1-1 1.2.1 Coordinating Committee ......................................................... 1-2 1.2.2 Stakeholders .......................................................................... 1-3 1.2.2.1 Identification of Stakeholder Types ....................... 1-4 1.2.3 Letter of Mutual Understandings Signatories .......................... 1-6 1.2.3.1 Alameda County Water District ............................. 1-6 1.2.3.2 Association of Bay Area Governments ................. 1-6 1.2.3.3 Bay Area Clean Water Agencies .......................... 1-6 1.2.3.4 Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency ................................................................. 1-8 1.2.3.5 Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District .................................. 1-8 1.2.3.6 Contra Costa Water District .................................. 1-9 1.2.3.7
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Projects Bidding 8/13/2021
    Weekly Projects Bidding 8/13/2021 Reasonable care is given in gathering, compiling and furnishing the information contained herein which is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but the Planroom is not responsible or liable for errors, omissions or inaccuracies. Plan# Name Bid Date & Time OPR# Location Estimate Project Type Monday, August 16, 2021 OUTREACH MEETING (VIRTUAL) EVERGREEN VALLEY COLLEGE (EVC) STUDENT SERVICES Addenda: 0 COMPLEX (REQUEST FOR SUB BIDS) SC 8/16/21 10:00 AM 21-02526 San Jose School ONLINE Plan Issuer: XL Construction 408-240-6000 408-240-6001 THIS IS A VIRTUAL OUTREACH MEETING. REGISTRATION IS REQUIRED. SEE FLYER FOR DETAILS. The 74,000 sf Student Services Complex at Evergreen Valley College is part of the San Jose Evergreen Community College District's Measure X Bond Program. This is a new ground-up two -story complex including collaboration spaces, offices, storage, restrooms and supporting facilities. All subcontractors must be prequalified with XL Construction to bid the project. Please email [email protected] for a prequalification application link, and [email protected] if you are an Under Utilized Business Enterprise (SBE, WBE, MBE, VBE...). REFINISHING GYM AND STAGE FLOORS AT CALIFORNIA SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND Addenda: 0 8/16/21 12:00 PM 21-02463 Fremont State-Federal Plan Issuer: California Department of Education - Personnel Service Division 916-319-0800 000-000-0000 Contract #: BF210152 The Contractor shall provide all labor, equipment and materials necessary for preparing and refinishing the stage and gym floors, twice a year, at the California School for the Blind (CSB), located at 500 Walnut Avenue, Fremont.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution and Abundance
    DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE IN RELATION TO HABITAT AND LANDSCAPE FEATURES AND NEST SITE CHARACTERISTICS OF CALIFORNIA BLACK RAIL (Laterallus jamaicensis coturniculus) IN THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY ESTUARY FINAL REPORT To the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service March 2002 Hildie Spautz* and Nadav Nur, PhD Point Reyes Bird Observatory 4990 Shoreline Highway Stinson Beach, CA 94970 *corresponding author contact: [email protected] PRBO Black Rail Report to FWS 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY We conducted surveys for California Black Rails (Laterallus jamaicensis coturniculus) at 34 tidal salt marshes in San Pablo Bay, Suisun Bay, northern San Francisco Bay and western Marin County in 2000 and 2001 with the aims of: 1) providing the best current information on distribution and abundance of Black Rails, marsh by marsh, and total population size per bay region, 2) identifying vegetation, habitat, and landscape features that predict the presence of black rails, and 3) summarizing information on nesting and nest site characteristics. Abundance indices were higher at 8 marshes than in 1996 and earlier surveys, and lower in 4 others; with two showing no overall change. Of 13 marshes surveyed for the first time, Black Rails were detected at 7 sites. The absolute density calculated using the program DISTANCE averaged 2.63 (± 1.05 [S.E.]) birds/ha in San Pablo Bay and 3.44 birds/ha (± 0.73) in Suisun Bay. At each survey point we collected information on vegetation cover and structure, and calculated landscape metrics using ArcView GIS. We analyzed Black Rail presence or absence by first analyzing differences among marshes, and then by analyzing factors that influence detection of rails at each survey station.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Sediment / Unlock Alameda Creek
    PUBLIC SEDIMENT / UNLOCK ALAMEDA CREEK WWW.RESILIENTBAYAREA.ORG ◄ BAYLANDS = LIVING INFRA STR CTY\, E' j(II( ........ • 400 +-' -L C Based on preliminary 0 analysis by SFfl. A more , detailed analysis is beinq E TIDAL MARSH conducted as part of -l/) the Healthy Watersheds l/) ro Resilient Aaylands E project (hwrb.sfei.org) +-' C QJ E "'O MUDFLAT QJ V1 SAC-SJ DELTA 0 1 Sediment supply was estimated by 'Sediment demand was estimated multiplying the current average using a mudflat soil bulK density of annual c;ediment load valuec; from 1.5 q c;ediment/rm c;oil (Brew and McKee et al. (in prep) by the number Williams :?010), a tidal marsh soil of years between 201 r and2100. bulK density ot 0.4 g sed1m ent / cm 3 c;oil (Callaway et al. :?010), and baywide mudflat and marsh area circa 2009 (BAARI vl). BAYLANDS TODAY BAYLANDS 2100 WITH 3' SLR LOW SEDIMENT SUPPLY BAYLANDS 2100 WITH 7' SLR LOW SEDIMENT SUPPLY WE MUST LOOK UPSTREAM TRIBUTARIES FEED THE BAY SONOMA CREEK NAPA RIVER PETALUMA CREEK WALNUT CREEK ALAMEDA CREEK COYOTE CREEK GUADALUPE CREEK ALAMEDA CREEK SEDIMENTSHED ALAMEDA CREEK ALAMEDA CREEK WATERSHED - 660 SQMI OAKLAND ALAMEDA CREEK WATERSHED SAN FRANCISCO SAN JOSE THE CREEK BUILT AN ALLUVIAL FAN AND FED THE BAY ALAMEDA CREEK SOUTH BAY NILES CONE ALLUVIAL FAN HIGH SEDIMENT FEEDS MARSHES TIDAL WETLANDS IT HAS BEEN LOCKED IN PLACE OVER TIME LIVERMORE PLEASANTON SUNOL UNION CITY NILES SAN MATEO BRIDGE EDEN LANDING FREMONT NEWARK LOW SEDIMENT CARGILL SALT PONDS DUMBARTON BRIDGE SEDIMENT FLOWS ARE HIGHLY MODIFIED SEDIMENT IS STUCK IN CHANNEL IMPOUNDED BY DAMS UPSTREAM REDUCED SUPPLY TO THE BAY AND VULNERABILITIES ARE EXACERBATED BY CLIMATE CHANGE EROSION SUBSIDENCE SEA LEVEL RISE THE FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL SAN MATEO BRIDGE UNION CITY NILES RUBBER DAMS BART WEIR EDEN LANDING PONDS HEAD OF TIDE FREMONT 880 NEWARK TIDAL EXTENT FLUVIAL EXTENT DUMBARTON BRIDGE.
    [Show full text]
  • Hayward Regional Shoreline Adaptation Master Plan Appendix a Stakeholder and Public Comments
    SCAPE ARCADIS CONVEY RE:FOCUS SFEI HAYWARD REGIONAL SHORELINE ADAPTATION MASTER PLAN FOR THE HAYWARD AREA SHORELINE PLANNING AGENCY (HASPA) PART OF A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT OF THE CITY OF HAYWARD, HAYWARD AREA RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT, AND EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT HAYWARD REGIONAL SHORELINE MASTER PLAN APPENDIX A STAKEHOLDER AND PUBLIC COMMENTS SUBMITTED 10/02/2020 PUBLIC ONLINE SURVEY 02/27/19 - 03/15/19 ONLINE SURVEY SUMMARY A 23-question survey was conducted on behalf of the Hayward Area Shoreline Planning Agency (HASPA) to assess the public’s general understanding of Hayward Regional Shoreline, mainly in regard to sea level rise, potential flooding, and participants’ feelings, concerns, and predictions regarding these issues. In the spring of 2019, this survey was completed by approximately 900 people throughout the Bay Area, primarily those who live, work, commute through, or recreate at or near the shoreline. 1. Are you familiar with the Hayward Regional Shoreline that is managed by East Bay Regional Park District and Hayward Area Recreation and Park District? The majority of people surveyed are familiar with the Hayward Regional Shoreline. 2. What’s your association with the project area? The majority of those surveyed either drive through the area or enjoy the views of the Shoreline. Approximately two thirds of those surveyed visit the Shoreline and about one third live near the Shoreline. A smaller percentage (about ten percent) specified that they enjoy activities such as birding, cycling, jogging or walking along the Shoreline. A negligible amount of those surveyed stated they’d like to see restaurants built on the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Active Wetland Habitat Projects of the San
    ACTIVE WETLAND HABITAT PROJECTS OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY JOINT VENTURE The SFBJV tracks and facilitates habitat protection, restoration, and enhancement projects throughout the nine Bay Area Projects listed Alphabetically by County counties. This map shows where a variety of active wetland habitat projects with identified funding needs are currently ALAMEDA COUNTY MAP ACRES FUND. NEED MARIN COUNTY (continued) MAP ACRES FUND. NEED underway. For a more comprehensive list of all the projects we track, visit: www.sfbayjv.org/projects.php Alameda Creek Fisheries Restoration 1 NA $12,000,000 McInnis Marsh Habitat Restoration 33 180 $17,500,000 Alameda Point Restoration 2 660 TBD Novato Deer Island Tidal Wetlands Restoration 34 194 $7,000,000 Coyote Hills Regional Park - Restoration and Public Prey enhancement for sea ducks - a novel approach 3 306 $12,000,000 35 3.8 $300,000 Access Project to subtidal habitat restoration Hayward Shoreline Habitat Restoration 4 324 $5,000,000 Redwood Creek Restoration at Muir Beach, Phase 5 36 46 $8,200,000 Hoffman Marsh Restoration Project - McLaughlin 5 40 $2,500,000 Spinnaker Marsh Restoration 37 17 $3,000,000 Eastshore State Park Intertidal Habitat Improvement Project - McLaughlin 6 4 $1,000,000 Tennessee Valley Wetlands Restoration 38 5 $600,000 Eastshore State Park Martin Luther King Jr. Regional Shoreline - Water 7 200 $3,000,000 Tiscornia Marsh Restoration 39 16 $1,500,000 Quality Project Oakland Gateway Shoreline - Restoration and 8 200 $12,000,000 Tomales Dunes Wetlands 40 2 $0 Public Access Project Off-shore Bird Habitat Project - McLaughlin 9 1 $1,500,000 NAPA COUNTY MAP ACRES FUND.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildcat Creek Restoration Action Plan Version 1.3 April 26, 2010 Prepared by the URBAN CREEKS COUNCIL for the WILDCAT-SAN PABLO WATERSHED COUNCIL
    wildcat creek restoration action plan version 1.3 April 26, 2010 prepared by THE URBAN CREEKS COUNCIL for the WILDCAT-SAN PABLO WATERSHED COUNCIL Adopted by the City of San Pablo on August 3, 2010 wildcat creek restoration action plan table of contents 1. INTRODUCTION 5 1.1 plan obJectives 5 1.2 scope 6 Urban Urban 1.5 Methods 8 1.5 Metadata c 10 reeks 2. WATERSHED OVERVIEW 12 c 2.1 introdUction o 12 U 2.2 watershed land Use ncil 13 2.3 iMpacts of Urbanized watersheds 17 april 2.4 hydrology 19 2.5 sediMent transport 22 2010 2.6 water qUality 24 2.7 habitat 26 2.8 flood ManageMent on lower wildcat creek 29 2.9 coMMUnity 32 3. PROJECT AREA ANALYSIS 37 3.1 overview 37 3.2 flooding 37 3.4 in-streaM conditions 51 3.5 sUMMer fish habitat 53 3.6 bioassessMent 57 4. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS 58 4.1 obJectives, findings and strategies 58 4.2 recoMMended actions according to strategy 61 4.3 streaM restoration recoMMendations by reach 69 4.4 recoMMended actions for phase one reaches 73 t 4.5 phase one flood daMage redUction reach 73 able of 4.6 recoMMended actions for watershed coUncil 74 c ontents version 1.3 april 26, 2010 2 wildcat creek restoration action plan Urban creeks coUncil april 2010 table of contents 3 figUre 1-1: wildcat watershed overview to Point Pinole Regional Shoreline wildcat watershed existing trail wildcat creek highway railroad city of san pablo planned trail other creek arterial road bart Parkway SAN PABLO Richmond BAY Avenue San Pablo Point UP RR San Pablo WEST COUNTY BNSF RR CITY OF LANDFILL NORTH SAN PABLO RICHMOND San Pablo
    [Show full text]
  • REQUEST for QUALIFICATIONS and PROPOSALS Notice of Development Opportunity Historic Anitas Building: 920 Macdonald Ave
    REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS AND PROPOSALS Notice of Development Opportunity Historic Anitas Building: 920 Macdonald Ave. Macdonald Ave. and 11th St. - 1940’s Source: Online Archive of California City of Richmond, California Issued by the City of Richmond, CA City Manager’s Office, Development Services Submission Deadline: May 3, 2019 at 12:00 PM (PDT) City of Richmond, CA REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS AND PROPOSALS Notice of Development Opportunity 920 Macdonald Ave. City of Richmond, California City Council Mayor Tom Butt Vice Mayor Melvin Willis Councilmember Nathaniel Bates Councilmember Ben Choi Councilmember Eduardo Martinez Councilmember Jael Myrick Councilmember Demnlus Johnson III City Manager Carlos Martinez City Manager Bill Lindsay Stay updated on all Richmond Opportunity Sites: http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/OpportunitySites Request for Qualifications/Request for Proposals: 920 Macdonald Ave. 2 City of Richmond, CA Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................... 4 II. NEIGHBORHOOD & COMMUNITY ASSETS............................. 6 III. SITE VISION...................................................................................... 21 IV. SITE AND PARCEL SUMMARY...................................................... 23 V. DEVELOPMENT TEAM SELECTION............................................ 29 VI. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS..................................................... 30 VII. SELECTION CRITERIA, PROCESS & SCHEDULE.................. 33 VIII. CITY NON-LIABILITY & RELATED MATTERS....................
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Status of Coho Salmon in Streams of the Urbanized San Francisco Estuary, California
    CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME California Fish and Game 91(4):219-254 2005 HISTORICAL STATUS OF COHO SALMON IN STREAMS OF THE URBANIZED SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARY, CALIFORNIA ROBERT A. LEIDY1 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 [email protected] and GORDON BECKER Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration 4179 Piedmont Avenue, Suite 325 Oakland, CA 94611 [email protected] and BRETT N. HARVEY Graduate Group in Ecology University of California Davis, CA 95616 1Corresponding author ABSTRACT The historical status of coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch, was assessed in 65 watersheds surrounding the San Francisco Estuary, California. We reviewed published literature, unpublished reports, field notes, and specimens housed at museum and university collections and public agency files. In watersheds for which we found historical information for the occurrence of coho salmon, we developed a matrix of five environmental indicators to assess the probability that a stream supported habitat suitable for coho salmon. We found evidence that at least 4 of 65 Estuary watersheds (6%) historically supported coho salmon. A minimum of an additional 11 watersheds (17%) may also have supported coho salmon, but evidence is inconclusive. Coho salmon were last documented from an Estuary stream in the early-to-mid 1980s. Although broadly distributed, the environmental characteristics of streams known historically to contain coho salmon shared several characteristics. In the Estuary, coho salmon typically were members of three-to-six species assemblages of native fishes, including Pacific lamprey, Lampetra tridentata, steelhead, Oncorhynchus mykiss, California roach, Lavinia symmetricus, juvenile Sacramento sucker, Catostomus occidentalis, threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus, riffle sculpin, Cottus gulosus, prickly sculpin, Cottus asper, and/or tidewater goby, Eucyclogobius newberryi.
    [Show full text]
  • (Oncorhynchus Mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California
    Historical Distribution and Current Status of Steelhead/Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California Robert A. Leidy, Environmental Protection Agency, San Francisco, CA Gordon S. Becker, Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA Brett N. Harvey, John Muir Institute of the Environment, University of California, Davis, CA This report should be cited as: Leidy, R.A., G.S. Becker, B.N. Harvey. 2005. Historical distribution and current status of steelhead/rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration TABLE OF CONTENTS Forward p. 3 Introduction p. 5 Methods p. 7 Determining Historical Distribution and Current Status; Information Presented in the Report; Table Headings and Terms Defined; Mapping Methods Contra Costa County p. 13 Marsh Creek Watershed; Mt. Diablo Creek Watershed; Walnut Creek Watershed; Rodeo Creek Watershed; Refugio Creek Watershed; Pinole Creek Watershed; Garrity Creek Watershed; San Pablo Creek Watershed; Wildcat Creek Watershed; Cerrito Creek Watershed Contra Costa County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p. 39 Alameda County p. 45 Codornices Creek Watershed; Strawberry Creek Watershed; Temescal Creek Watershed; Glen Echo Creek Watershed; Sausal Creek Watershed; Peralta Creek Watershed; Lion Creek Watershed; Arroyo Viejo Watershed; San Leandro Creek Watershed; San Lorenzo Creek Watershed; Alameda Creek Watershed; Laguna Creek (Arroyo de la Laguna) Watershed Alameda County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p. 91 Santa Clara County p. 97 Coyote Creek Watershed; Guadalupe River Watershed; San Tomas Aquino Creek/Saratoga Creek Watershed; Calabazas Creek Watershed; Stevens Creek Watershed; Permanente Creek Watershed; Adobe Creek Watershed; Matadero Creek/Barron Creek Watershed Santa Clara County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Adaptation Study APPENDIX
    City of Richmond Climate Change Adaptation Study APPENDIX City of Richmond Climate Action Plan Appendix F: Climate Change Adaptation Study Acknowledgements The City of Richmond has been an active participant in the Contra Costa County Adapting to Rising Tides Project, led by the Bay Conservation Development Commission (BCDC) in partnership with the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, the State Coastal Conservancy, the San Francisco Estuary Partnership, the San Francisco Estuary Institute, Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, and consulting firm AECOM. Environmental Science Associates (ESA) completed this Adaptation Study in coordination with BCDC, relying in part on reports and maps developed for the Adapting to Rising Tides project to assess the City of Richmond’s vulnerabilities with respect to sea level rise and coastal flooding. City of Richmond Climate Action Plan F-i Appendix F: Climate Change Adaptation Study This page intentionally left blank F-ii City of Richmond Climate Action Plan Appendix F: Climate Change Adaptation Study Table of Contents Acknowledgements i 1. Executive Summary 1 1.1 Coastal Flooding 2 1.2 Water Supply 2 1.3 Critical Transportation Assets 3 1.4 Vulnerable Populations 3 1.5 Summary 3 2. Study Methodology 4 2.1 Scope and Organize 4 2.2 Assess 4 2.3 Define 4 2.4 Plan 5 2.5 Implement and Monitor 5 3. Setting 6 3.1 Statewide Climate Change Projections 6 3.2 Bay Area Region Climate Change Projections 7 3.3 Community Assets 8 3.4 Relevant Local Planning Initiatives 9 3.5 Relevant State and Regional Planning Initiatives 10 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural History of Niles Canyon
    NATURAL HISTORY OF NILES CANYON NILES CANYON STROLL AND ROLL Visit alamedacreek.org for more information or to become a member! Natural History of Niles Canyon Alameda Creek Alliance “Passing slowly up Alameda Cañon, with eyes open and ap- preciative, one may secure a gallery of mental pictures, which in richness of color, variety and beauty, will rival any collection of landscape paintings in the world… When we remember that this rare bit of rural beauty and wildness is almost on the thresh- old of a populous city, our appreciation is quickened and heightened.” From Picturesque California, edited by John Muir, 1888 Natural History of Niles Canyon Alameda Creek Alliance About This Tour Welcome to our interactive tour of the natural history of Niles Canyon! We invite you to learn more about the plants and animals that live in the can- yon, their ecology, and some of the modern history of the canyon. Click on: The numbered map (top) to open an interactive Google map of the tour Any underlined title to open a link with more information We recommend you open these links where there is wireless coverage, as it can be spotty in the canyon. Zoom around the map to cache details on your device. Use your device’s GPS to find your location relative to these spots. Natural History of Niles Canyon Alameda Creek Alliance Welcome to Niles Canyon, one of the many special places along Alameda Creek! Rare beauty and wildness can still be found along Alameda Creek, although our urban development now greatly encroaches upon the natural habitats of the watershed.
    [Show full text]