DOCSLIB.ORG

Jacobsen—American Journal of Botany 2021—Appendix S1 Diversity in Conduit and Pit Structure Among Extant Gymnosperm Taxa

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jacobsen—American Journal of Botany 2021—Appendix S1 Diversity in Conduit and Pit Structure Among Extant Gymnosperm Taxa Jacobsen—American Journal of Botany 2021—Appendix S1 Diversity in conduit and pit structure among extant gymnosperm taxa Appendix S1. Summary of pit membrane traits for extant gymnosperm genera and the references from which these traits are compiled. When different references have reported conflicting presence/absence reports for the same genus or species, these are highlighted in red text. The number of published reports for a given trait within a genus are included parenthetically for some traits. Species that were newly examined from dried wood blocks or fresh samples for the present review are indicated with an asterisk (*); these new examinations were not counted toward the number of reports nor the numbers of observations for trait characters. Phyla Family Genus Species for which traits Reports Species Vessels Pit Torus Pitting Pitting Reference(s) have been reported (#) with present membrane presence (-seriate) arrangement reported (Y/N) type (Y/N) (alternate/ traits (A/B/C) opposite) (#) Ginkgophyta Ginkgoaceae Ginkgo *Ginkgo biloba L. 9 1 N B (2) Y (1) and uni- & bi- opposite Penhallow 1907, N (6) Liese 1965, Bauch et al. 1972, Timell 1978, Schulte and Gibson 1988, Yin and Xiao-Mei 1992, Dute 1994, Hacke et al. 2004, Schweingruber et al. 2006 Gnetophyta Ephedraceae Ephedra Ephedra americana Humb. 22 12 Y (17) A (2) Y (17) and multi- alternate MacDuffie 1921, & Bonpl. ex Willd., N (2) Liese 1965, Ephedra distachya subsp. (vessels) (vessels) Bauch et al. 1972, helvetica (C.A.Mey.) Asch. (conduit- Carlquist 1990, & Graebn., type Carlquist 1992, Ephedra fasciculata specific) Carlquist 1996, A.Nelson, Schweingruber et al. 2006, Ephedra foeminea Forssk., Motomura et al. 2007, Ephedra fragilis Desf., Carlquist 2012, Ephedra major Host, Crivellaro and Schweingruber *Ephedra nevadensis 2013, S.Watson, Dute et al. 2014 Ephedra pachyclada Boiss., Ephedra pedunculata Engelm. ex S.Watson, Ephedra torreyana S.Watson, Ephedra trifurca Torr. ex S.Watson, *Ephedra viridis Coville, Ephedra spp. 1 Jacobsen—American Journal of Botany 2021—Appendix S1 Diversity in conduit and pit structure among extant gymnosperm taxa Phyla Family Genus Species for which traits Reports Species Vessels Pit Torus Pitting Pitting Reference(s) have been reported (#) with present membrane presence (-seriate) arrangement reported (Y/N) type (Y/N) (alternate/ traits (A/B/C) opposite) (#) Gnetophyta Gnetaceae Gnetum Gnetum africanum Welw., 29 14 Y (24) A (6) and C Y (11) and multi- Alternate MacDuffie 1921, Gnetum buchholzianum (3) N (9) Liese 1965, Engl., (vessels) (vessels) Bauch et al. 1972, Gnetum cuspidatum (conduit- (conduit- Muhammad and Sattler 1982, Blume, type and type and Carlquist and Robinson 1995, Gnetum edule (Willd.) species species Fisher and Ewers 1995, Blume, specific) specific) Carlquist 1996a, Gnetum gnemon L., Carlquist 1996b, Gnetum gnemonoides Schweingruber et al. 2006, Brongn., Carlquist 2012 Gnetum leyboldii Tul., Gnetum microcarpum Blume, Gnetum montanum Markgr., Gnetum nodiflorum Brongn., Gnetum paniculatum Spruce ex Benth., Gnetum schwackeanum Taub. ex Schenck, Gnetum urens (Aubl.) Blume, Gnetum venosum Spruce ex Benth., Gnetum spp. Gnetophyta Welwitschiaceae Welwitschia *Welwitschia mirabilis 6 1 Y (4) C (1) N (5) multi- alternate Greguss 1965, Hook.f. Liese 1965, (vessels) (vessels) Bauch et al. 1972, Carlquist and Gowans 1995, Carlquist 1996 2 Jacobsen—American Journal of Botany 2021—Appendix S1 Diversity in conduit and pit structure among extant gymnosperm taxa Phyla Family Genus Species for which traits Reports Species Vessels Pit Torus Pitting Pitting Reference(s) have been reported (#) with present membrane presence (-seriate) arrangement reported (Y/N) type (Y/N) (alternate/ traits (A/B/C) opposite) (#) Cycadophyta Cycadaceae Cycas Cycas circinalis L., 11 9 Y (5) C (4) N (4) multi- alternate Greguss 1961, Cycas ferruginea F.N.Wei, and N Greguss 1965, Cycas media R.Br., (2) Liese 1965, Cycas panzhihuaensis Bauch et al. 1972, L.Zhou & S.Y.Yang, Huang and Wu 2007, *Cycas revoluta Thunb., Schneider et al. 2007, Cycas siamensis Miq., Huang et al. 2010, Cycas szechuanensis Huang et al. 2017 W.C.Cheng & L.K.Fu, Cycas taitungensis C.F.Shen, K.D.Hill, C.H.Tsou & C.J.Chen, Cycas taiwaniana Carruth., Cycas spp. Cycadophyta Zamiaceae Bowenia 0 0 Cycadophyta Zamiaceae Ceratozamia Ceratozamia robusta Miq., 4 4 Y (3) C (1) N (1) Schneider et al. 2007, Ceratozamia becerrae and N Voides et al. 2000 Pérez-Farr., Vovides & (1) Schutzman, Ceratozamia euryphyllidia Vázq.Torres, Sabato & D.W.Stev., Ceratozamia hondurensis J.L.Haynes, Whitelock, Schutzman & R.S.Adams Cycadophyta Zamiaceae Dioon Dioon edule Lindl., 7 5 Y (1) C (1) N (3) multi- alternate Chamberlain 1911, Dioon holmgrenii De Luca, and N Bailey 1925, Dioon merolae De Luca, (4) Greguss 1961, Sabato & Vázq.Torres, Schulte and Gibson 1988, Dioon purpusii Rose, Schneider et al. 2007, Dioon spinulosum Dyer ex Huang et al. 2010 Eichl. Cycadophyta Zamiaceae Encephalartos Encephalartos altensteinii 5 4 N (2) C (2) N (2) multi- alternate Greguss 1961, Lehm., Greguss 1965, Encephalartos barteri Schneider et al. 2007 Carruth. ex Miq., Encephalartos gratus Prain, 3 Jacobsen—American Journal of Botany 2021—Appendix S1 Diversity in conduit and pit structure among extant gymnosperm taxa Phyla Family Genus Species for which traits Reports Species Vessels Pit Torus Pitting Pitting Reference(s) have been reported (#) with present membrane presence (-seriate) arrangement reported (Y/N) type (Y/N) (alternate/ traits (A/B/C) opposite) (#) Encephalartos senticosus Vorster, Encepalartos sp. Cycadophyta Zamiaceae Lepidozamia Lepidozamia hopei (W.Hill) 1 1 Y (1) multi- alternate Greguss 1961 Regel Cycadophyta Zamiaceae Macrozamia Macrozamia communis 4 3 Y (1) N (2) multi- alternate Greguss 1965, L.A.S.Johnson, and N Schneider et al. 2007, Macrozamia macdonnellii (2) Huang et al. 2010 (F.Muell. ex Miq.) A.DC., Macrozamia moorei F.Muell., Macrozamia sp. Cycadophyta Zamiaceae Microcycas Microcycas calocoma 2 1 N (1) multi- Greguss 1961, (Miq.) A.DC., Microcycas Greguss 1965 sp. Cycadophyta Zamiaceae Stangeria Stangeria eriopus (Kunze) 3 1 Y (1) N (1) Greguss 1965, Baill. and N Schneider et al. 2007, (1) Huang et al. 2010 Cycadophyta Zamiaceae Zamia Zamia furfuracea L.f. ex 6 5 Y (1) C (1) N (2) multi- alternate Greguss 1961, Aiton, and N Greguss 1965, Zamia loddigesii Miq., (2) Yuyuan and Hongda 1998, Zamia neurophyllidia Schneider et al. 2007 D.W.Stev., Zamia skinneri Warsz. ex A.Dietr., Zamia muricata Willd. Coniferophyta Araucariaceae Agathis *Agathis australis (D.Don) 10 6 N B (4) N (5) bi- & alternate Penhallow 1907, Lindl., multi- Patel 1968a, Agathis borneensis Warb., Jane et al. 1970, *Agathis dammara Bauch et al. 1972, (Lamb.) Poir., Donaldson 1983, Agathis macrophylla Dickson 2000 (Lindl.) Mast., Agathis philippinensis Warb., Agathis robusta (C.Moore ex F.Muell.) F.M.Bailey 4 Jacobsen—American Journal of Botany 2021—Appendix S1 Diversity in conduit and pit structure among extant gymnosperm taxa Phyla Family Genus Species for which traits Reports Species Vessels Pit Torus Pitting Pitting Reference(s) have been reported (#) with present membrane presence (-seriate) arrangement reported (Y/N) type (Y/N) (alternate/ traits (A/B/C) opposite) (#) Coniferophyta Araucariaceae Araucaria *Araucaria angustifolia 15 5 N B (7) N (7) uni-, bi-, alternate Penhallow 1907, (Bertol.) Kuntze, & multi- Liese 1965, *Araucaria bidwillii Hook., Jane et al. 1970, *Araucaria columnaris Bauch et al. 1972, (G.Forst.) Hook., Butterfield and Meylan 1980, *Araucaria cunninghamii Yin and Xiao-Mei 1992, Mudie, Schweingruber et al. 2006, *Araucaria heterophylla Carlquist 2017 (Salisb.) Franco, Araucaria spp. Coniferophyta Araucariaceae Wollemia Wollemia nobilis 1 1 N B (1) N (1) uni- & bi- alternate Heady et al. 2002 W.G.Jones, K.D.Hill & J.M.Allen Coniferophyta Cupressaceae Athrotaxis Athrotaxis × laxifolia 3 1 N B (1) Y (2) and uni- (bi-) Bauch et al. 1972, Hook., N (1) Pittermann et al. 2010, Athrotaxis sp. Román-Jordán et al. 2017 Coniferophyta Cupressaceae Austrocedrus Austrocedrus chilensis 2 1 N A (1) Y (2) uni- (bi-) alternate Roig 1992, (D.Don) Pic.Serm. & Román-Jordán et al. 2017 Bizzarri Coniferophyta Cupressaceae Callitris *Callitris columellaris 11 6 N A (3) Y (10) uni- Bauch et al. 1972, F.Muell., Butterfield and Meylan 1980, Callitris muelleri (Parl.) Gadek et al. 2000, Benth. & Hook.f. ex Delzon et al. 2010, F.Muell., Pittermann et al. 2010, Callitris pancheri (Carrière) Román-Jordán et al. 2017 Byng, Callitris pyramidalis (Miq.) J.E.Piggin & J.J.Bruhl, Callitris rhomboidea R.Br. ex Rich., Callitris robusta R.Br. ex Mirb., Callitris spp. Coniferophyta Cupressaceae Callitropsis *Callitropsis nootkatensis 3 1 N A (1) Y (2) uni- (bi-) Penhallow 1907, (D.Don) Oerst. Bauch et al. 1972, Román-Jordán et al. 2017 5 Jacobsen—American Journal of Botany 2021—Appendix S1 Diversity in conduit and pit structure among extant gymnosperm taxa Phyla Family Genus Species for which traits Reports Species Vessels Pit Torus Pitting Pitting Reference(s) have been reported (#) with present membrane presence (-seriate) arrangement reported (Y/N) type (Y/N) (alternate/ traits (A/B/C) opposite) (#) Coniferophyta Cupressaceae Calocedrus *Calocedrus decurrens 5 2 N A (1) Y (4) uni- (bi-) Penhallow 1907, (Torr.) Florin, Bauch et al. 1972, Calocedrus macrolepis Pittermann et al. 2010, Kurz Román-Jordán et al. 2017 Coniferophyta Cupressaceae Chamaecyparis *Chamaecyparis 12 4 N A (4) Y (6) uni- & bi- opposite Penhallow 1907, lawsoniana (A.Murray bis) Bauch et al. 1972, Parl., Butterfield and Meylan 1980, Chamaecyparis obtusa Román-Jordán et al. 2017, (Siebold & Zucc.) Endl., Huang et al. 2017 Chamaecyparis pisifera (Siebold & Zucc.) Endl., *Chamaecyparis thyoides (L.) Britton, Sterns & Poggenb. Coniferophyta Cupressaceae Cryptomeria *Cryptomeria japonica 6 1 N A (2) Y (5) uni- (bi-) Penhallow 1907, (Thunb. ex L.f.) D.Don Bauch et al. 1972, Fujii et al. 1997, Kitin et al. 2009, Pittermann et al. 2010, Román-Jordán et al. 2017 Coniferophyta Cupressaceae Cunninghamia *Cunninghamia lanceolata 2 1 N B (1) Y (1) and uni- (bi-) Bauch et al. 1972, (Lamb.) Hook. N (1) Román-Jordán et al.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Department of Planning and Zoning
    Department of Planning and Zoning Subject: Howard County Landscape Manual Updates: Recommended Street Tree List (Appendix B) and Recommended Plant List (Appendix C) - Effective July 1, 2010 To: DLD Review Staff Homebuilders Committee From: Kent Sheubrooks, Acting Chief Division of Land Development Date: July 1, 2010 Purpose: The purpose of this policy memorandum is to update the Recommended Plant Lists presently contained in the Landscape Manual. The plant lists were created for the first edition of the Manual in 1993 before information was available about invasive qualities of certain recommended plants contained in those lists (Norway Maple, Bradford Pear, etc.). Additionally, diseases and pests have made some other plants undesirable (Ash, Austrian Pine, etc.). The Howard County General Plan 2000 and subsequent environmental and community planning publications such as the Route 1 and Route 40 Manuals and the Green Neighborhood Design Guidelines have promoted the desirability of using native plants in landscape plantings. Therefore, this policy seeks to update the Recommended Plant Lists by identifying invasive plant species and disease or pest ridden plants for their removal and prohibition from further planting in Howard County and to add other available native plants which have desirable characteristics for street tree or general landscape use for inclusion on the Recommended Plant Lists. Please note that a comprehensive review of the street tree and landscape tree lists were conducted for the purpose of this update, however, only
    [Show full text]
  • Composition of the Wood Oils of Calocedrus Macrolepis, Calocedrus
    American Journal of Essential Oils and Natural Products 2013; 1 (1): 28-33 ISSN XXXXX Composition of the wood oils of Calocedrus AJEONP 2013; 1 (1): 28-33 © 2013 AkiNik Publications macrolepis, Calocedrus rupestris and Received 16-7-2013 Cupressus tonkinensis (Cupressaceae) from Accepted: 20-8-2013 Vietnam Do N. Dai Do N. Dai, Tran D. Thang, Tran H. Thai, Bui V. Thanh, Isiaka A. Ogunwande Faculty of Biology, Vinh University, 182-Le Duan, Vihn City, Nghean ABSTRACT Province, Vietnam. E-mail: [email protected] In the present investigation we studied the essential oil contents and compositions of three individual plants from Cupressaceae family cultivated in Vietnam. The air-dried plants were hydrodistilled and Tran D. Thang the oils analysed by GC and GC-MS. The components were identified by MS libraries and their RIs. Faculty of Biology, Vinh University, The wood essential oil of Calocedrus rupestris Aver, H.T. Nguyen et L.K. Phan., afforded oil whose 182-Le Duan, Vihn City, Nghean major compounds were sesquiterpenes represented mainly by α-cedrol (31.1%) and thujopsene Province, Vietnam. E-mail: [email protected] (15.2%). In contrast, monoterpene compounds mainly α-terpineol (11.6%) and myrtenal (10.6%) occurred in Calocedrus macrolepis Kurz. The wood of Cupressus tonkinensis Silba afforded oil Tran H. Thai whose major compounds were also the monoterpenes namely sabinene (22.3%), -pinene (15.2%) Institute of Ecology and Biological and terpinen-4-ol (15.5%). The chemotaxonomic implication of the present results was also Resources, Vietnam Academy of discussed. Science and Technology, 18-Hoang Quoc Viet, Cau Giay, Hanoi, Keywords: Calocedrus macrolepis; Calocedrus rupestris; α-cedrol; Cupressus tonkinensis; Essential oil Vietnam.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Distribution and Historical Dynamics of Threatened Conifers of the Dalat Plateau, Vietnam
    SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION AND HISTORICAL DYNAMICS OF THREATENED CONIFERS OF THE DALAT PLATEAU, VIETNAM A thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School At the University of Missouri In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts By TRANG THI THU TRAN Dr. C. Mark Cowell, Thesis Supervisor MAY 2011 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the thesis entitled SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION AND HISTORICAL DYNAMICS OF THREATENED CONIFERS OF THE DALAT PLATEAU, VIETNAM Presented by Trang Thi Thu Tran A candidate for the degree of Master of Arts of Geography And hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. Professor C. Mark Cowell Professor Cuizhen (Susan) Wang Professor Mark Morgan ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research project would not have been possible without the support of many people. The author wishes to express gratitude to her supervisor, Prof. Dr. Mark Cowell who was abundantly helpful and offered invaluable assistance, support, and guidance. My heartfelt thanks also go to the members of supervisory committees, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Cuizhen (Susan) Wang and Prof. Mark Morgan without their knowledge and assistance this study would not have been successful. I also wish to thank the staff of the Vietnam Initiatives Group, particularly to Prof. Joseph Hobbs, Prof. Jerry Nelson, and Sang S. Kim for their encouragement and support through the duration of my studies. I also extend thanks to the Conservation Leadership Programme (aka BP Conservation Programme) and Rufford Small Grands for their financial support for the field work. Deepest gratitude is also due to Sub-Institute of Ecology Resources and Environmental Studies (SIERES) of the Institute of Tropical Biology (ITB) Vietnam, particularly to Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • US Fish and Wildlife Service
    BARNEBY REED-MUSTARD (S. barnebyi ) CLAY REED-MUSTARD SHRUBBY REED-MUSTARD (S,arguillacea) (S. suffrutescens) .-~ U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service UTAH REED—MUSTARDS: CLAY REED-MUSTARD (SCHOENOCRAMBE ARGILLACEA) BARNEBY REED—MUSTARD (SCHOENOCRAMBE BARNEBYI) SI-IRUBBY REED-MUSTARD (SCHOENOCRAMBE SUFFRUTESCENS) RECOVERY PLAN Prepared by Region 6, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Approved: Date: (~19~- Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions which are believed to be required to recover and/or protect the species. Plans are prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, sometimes with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Objectives will only be attained and funds expended contingent upon appropriations, priorities, and other budgetary constraints. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views or the official positions or approvals of any individuals or agencies, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, involved in the plan formulation. They represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Regional Director or Director as an~roved Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks. Literature Citation should read as follows: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1994. Utah reed—mustards: clay reed—mustard (Schoenocrambe argillacea), Barneby reed-mustard (Schoenocrambe barnebyl), shrubby reed—mustard (Schoenacranibe suffrutescens) recovery plan. Denver, Colorado. 22 pp. Additional copies may be purchased from: Fish and Wildlife Reference Service 5430 Grosvenor Lane, Suite 110 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Telephone: 301/492—6403 or 1—800—582—3421 The fee for the plan varies depending on the number of pages of the plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversifying Tree Choices for a Shadier Future
    Diversifying Tree Choices for a Shadier Future Adam Black Director, Peckerwood Garden Hempstead TX With special cameo appearance by Dr. David Creech Dr. David Creech Who is this guy? • Former horticulturist at Kanapaha Botanial Gardens, Gainesville FL • Managed Forest Pathology and Forest Entomology labs at University of Florida • Former co-owner of Xenoflora LLC (rare plant mail- order nursery) • Current Director of Peckerwood Garden, Hempstead, Texas Tree Diversity in Landscapes Advantages of diverse tree assemblages • Include many plant families attracts biodiversity (pollinators, predators, etc) that all together reduce pest problems • Diversity means loss is minimal if a new disease targets a particular genus. • Generate excitement and improve aesthetics • Use of locally adapted forms over mainstream selections from distant locations • Adaptations for specific conditions (salt, alkalinity, etc) • If mass plantings are necessary, use seed grown plants for genetic diversity rather than clonally propagated selections Disadvantages of diverse tree assmeblages • Hard to find among the standard issue trees available locally • Hard to convince nurseries to try something new • Initial trialing of new material, many failures among the winners • A disadvantage in some cases – non-native counterparts may be superior to natives. Diseases: • Dutch Elm Disease (Ulmus americana) • Emerald Ash Borer (Fraxinus spp.) • Laurel Wilt (Persea, Sassafras, Lindera, etc) • Crepe Myrtle Bark Scale (Lagerstroemia spp.) • Next? Quercus virginiana Quercus fusiformis Quercus fusiformis Weeping form Quercus virginiana ‘Grandview Gold’ Quercus nigra Variegated Quercus tarahumara Quercus crassifolia Quercus sp. San Carlos Mtns Quercus tarahumara Quercus laeta Quercus polymorpha Quercus germana There is one in the auction! Quercus rysophylla Quercus sinuata var. sinuata Quercus imbricaria (southern forms) Quercus glauca Quercus acutus Quercus schottkyana Quercus marlipoensis Lithocarpus edulis ‘Starburst’ Lithocarpus henryi Lithocarpus kawakamii Platanus rzedowski incorrectly offered as P.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Changes in the Names of New Zealand Tree and Shrub Species
    -- -- - Recent changes in the names of New Zealand tree and shrub species - Since the publication of 'Flora of New Zealand' Volume 1 (A- iii) Podocarpus dacydioides Dacrycarpus ducydioides lan 1961),covering indigenous ferns, conifers and dicots, there (iii)Podocarpus ferrugzneus Prumnopitys ferruginea have been major advances in taxonomic research and the clas- Podocarpus spicatus Prumnopitys taxijolia sification of many plant groups revised accordingly. Most of (iv1 Dacrydium cupressinum (unchanged) these changes have been summarised in the Nomina Nova (v)Dacrydium bidwillii Halocarpus bidwillii series published in the New Zealand Journal of Botany (Edgar Dacrydium bijorme Halocarpus bijormis 1971, Edgar and Connor 1978, 1983) and are included in re- Dacrydium kirkii Halocarpus kirkii cent books on New Zealand plants ie.g. Eagle 1982, Wilson (vi)Dacydium colensoi Lagarostrobos colensoi 1982). A number of these name changes affect important (vii)Dacrydium intermediurn Lepidothamnus intermedius forest plants and as several of these new names are now start- Dacrydium laxijolium Lepidotbamnus laxijolius ing to appear in the scientific literature, a list of changes af- (viii)Phyllocladus trichomanoidi~(unchanged) fecting tree and shrub taxa are given here. As a large number Phyllocladus glaucus (unchanged) of the readers of New Zealand Forestry are likely to use Poole Phyllocladus alpinus Phyllocladus aspleniijolius and Adams' "Trees and Shrubs of New Zealand" as their var. alpinus* * main reference for New Zealand forest plants, all the name changes are related to the fourth impression of this book. * It has been suggested that the Colenso name P, cunnin- it is important to realise that not all botanists necessarily ghamii (1884)should take precedence over the later (18891 ark agree with one particular name and you are not obliged to use name (P.
    [Show full text]
  • Programa Nacional Para La Aplicación De La Normativa Fitosanitaria
    PROGRAMA NACIONAL PARA LA APLICACIÓN DE LA NORMATIVA FITOSANITARIA PLAN NACIONAL DE CONTINGENCIA DE Dendrolimus sibiricus Tschetverikov SEPTIEMBRE 2020 SUMARIO DE MODIFICACIONES REVISIÓN FECHA DESCRIPCIÓN OBJETO DE LA REVISIÓN 30/09/2020 Documento base Plan Contingencia Dendrolimus sibiricus 2020 INDICE 1. Introducción y Objetivos 2. Definiciones 3. Marco legislativo, Organización y Estructura de mando 3.1 Marco legislativo 3.2 Marco legislativo, Organización y Estructura 4. Información sobre la enfermedad 4.1 Distribución de la plaga 4.2 Taxonomía 4.3 Daño 4.4 Plantas hospedantes 5. Métodos de identificación y diagnóstico 5.1 Detección de la plaga 5.2 Identificación y diagnóstico 6. Ejecución del Plan Nacional de Contingencia 6.1 Plan de Nacional Contingencia y los planes específicos de acción 6.2 Medidas cautelares a adoptar en caso de sospecha de la presencia de Dendrolimus sibiricus. 6.3 Medidas a adoptar en caso de confirmación de la presencia de Dendrolimus sibiricus. 6.4 Medidas de erradicación. 6.5 Medidas en caso de incumplimiento. 7. Comunicación, Documentación y Formación 7.1. Comunicación externa y campañas de divulgación/sensibilización. 7.2 Consulta a los grupos de interés 7.3. Comunicación interna y documentación 7.4. Pruebas y formación del personal 8. Evaluación y revisión 9. Referencias Anexo 1: PROTOCOLO DE PROSPECCIONES DE Dendrolimus sibiricus Anexo 2: PROGRAMA DE ERRADICACIÓN DE Dendrolimus sibiricus Página 1 de 27 Plan Contingencia Dendrolimus sibiricus 2020 1. Introducción y Objetivos En el presente documento se recogen las medidas que deben adoptarse contra Dendrolimus sibiricus, organismo nocivo regulado, con el objetivo de impedir su aparición, y en caso de que aparezca, actuar con rapidez y eficacia, determinar su distribución y aplicar medidas de erradicación.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened, Endangered, Candidate & Proposed Plant Species of Utah
    TECHNICAL NOTE USDA - Natural Resources Conservation Service Boise, Idaho and Salt Lake City, Utah TN PLANT MATERIALS NO. 52 MARCH 2011 THREATENED, ENDANGERED, CANDIDATE & PROPOSED PLANT SPECIES OF UTAH Derek Tilley, Agronomist, NRCS, Aberdeen, Idaho Loren St. John, PMC Team Leader, NRCS, Aberdeen, Idaho Dan Ogle, Plant Materials Specialist, NRCS, Boise, Idaho Casey Burns, State Biologist, NRCS, Salt Lake City, Utah Last Chance Townsendia (Townsendia aprica). Photo by Megan Robinson. This technical note identifies the current threatened, endangered, candidate and proposed plant species listed by the U.S.D.I. Fish and Wildlife Service (USDI FWS) in Utah. Review your county list of threatened and endangered species and the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Conservation Data Center (CDC) GIS T&E database to see if any of these species have been identified in your area of work. Additional information on these listed species can be found on the USDI FWS web site under “endangered species”. Consideration of these species during the planning process and determination of potential impacts related to scheduled work will help in the conservation of these rare plants. Contact your Plant Material Specialist, Plant Materials Center, State Biologist and Area Biologist for additional guidance on identification of these plants and NRCS responsibilities related to the Endangered Species Act. 2 Table of Contents Map of Utah Threatened, Endangered and Candidate Plant Species 4 Threatened & Endangered Species Profiles Arctomecon humilis Dwarf Bear-poppy ARHU3 6 Asclepias welshii Welsh’s Milkweed ASWE3 8 Astragalus ampullarioides Shivwits Milkvetch ASAM14 10 Astragalus desereticus Deseret Milkvetch ASDE2 12 Astragalus holmgreniorum Holmgren Milkvetch ASHO5 14 Astragalus limnocharis var.
    [Show full text]
  • Stand Structure and Dynamics During a 16-Year Period in a Conifer-Hardwood Mixed Forest, Northern Japan
    Takahashi et al. 1 Stand structure and dynamics during a 16-year period in a sub-boreal conifer-hardwood mixed forest, northern Japan Koichi Takahashia,1,*, Daisuke Mitsuishia, Shigeru Uemurab, Jun-Ichirou Suzukia,2, Toshihiko Haraa a: The Institute of Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0819, Japan b: Forest Research Station, Field Science Center for Northern Biosphere, Hokkaido University, Nayoro 096-0071, Japan Present address 1: Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Shinshu University, Matsumoto 390-8621, Japan 2: Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo 192-0397, Japan *: All correspondence to K. Takahashi at the above present address#1. Fax: +81.263.37.2560 E-mail: [email protected] This manuscript consists of 23-typed pages including figure legends, 3 tables and 6 figures. Takahashi et al. 2 Abstract The stand structure and regeneration dynamics of trees > 2.0 m in trunk height were studied during 1982–1998 in a 1-ha plot in a sub-boreal conifer-hardwood mixed forest, northern Japan, with a dense dwarf bamboo in the understory. Total density was low in 1982 (651 trees/ha), as compared with other forests in Japan. Quercus crispula was dominant in the upper canopy layer but their saplings were rare, while Acer mono, Acer japonicum and Abies sachalinensis were dominant in the sub-canopy and understory layers with many saplings. Mortality of each species was quite low during the census period (average 0.57%/yr), and there was no clear difference among the four species. The age structure of Quercus crispula was bell-shaped with a peak at ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Selected Provenances of Taxodium Distichum For
    EVALUATION OF SELECTED PROVENANCES OF TAXODIUM DISTICHUM FOR DROUGHT, ALKALINITY AND SALINITY TOLERANCE A Dissertation by GEOFFREY CARLILE DENNY Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2007 Major Subject: Horticulture EVALUATION OF SELECTED PROVENANCES OF TAXODIUM DISTICHUM FOR DROUGHT, ALKALINITY AND SALINITY TOLERANCE A Dissertation by GEOFFREY CARLILE DENNY Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Chair of Committee, Michael A. Arnold Committee Members, Leonardo Lombardini Wayne A. Mackay W. Todd Watson Head of Department, Tim D. Davis May 2007 Major Subject: Horticulture iii ABSTRACT Evaluation of Selected Provenances of Taxodium distichum for Drought, Alkalinity and Salinity Tolerance. (May 2007) Geoffrey Carlile Denny, B.S., Texas A&M University; M.A., The University of Texas Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Michael A. Arnold Taxodium distichum (L.) Rich. is a widely adaptable, long-lived tree species for landscape use. It is tolerant of substantial soil salt levels, but tends to defoliate in periods of extended or severe drought, when leaves come into contact with salty irrigation water, and tends to develop chlorosis on high pH soils. The purpose of this research was to identify provenances which may yield genotypes tolerant of these stresses. The appropriate name for baldcypress is Taxodium distichum (L.) Rich. var. distichum, for pondcypress is T. distichum var. imbricarium (Nutt.) Croom, and for Montezuma cypress is T. distichum var.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Biogeography of Tsuga (Pinaceae)
    Systematic Botany (2008), 33(3): pp. 478–489 © Copyright 2008 by the American Society of Plant Taxonomists Phylogeny and Biogeography of Tsuga (Pinaceae) Inferred from Nuclear Ribosomal ITS and Chloroplast DNA Sequence Data Nathan P. Havill1,6, Christopher S. Campbell2, Thomas F. Vining2,5, Ben LePage3, Randall J. Bayer4, and Michael J. Donoghue1 1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8106 U.S.A 2School of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04469-5735 U.S.A. 3The Academy of Natural Sciences, 1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 U.S.A. 4CSIRO – Division of Plant Industry, Center for Plant Biodiversity Research, GPO 1600, Canberra, ACT 2601 Australia; present address: Department of Biology, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennesee 38152 U.S.A. 5Present address: Delta Institute of Natural History, 219 Dead River Road, Bowdoin, Maine 04287 U.S.A. 6Author for correspondence ([email protected]) Communicating Editor: Matt Lavin Abstract—Hemlock, Tsuga (Pinaceae), has a disjunct distribution in North America and Asia. To examine the biogeographic history of Tsuga, phylogenetic relationships among multiple accessions of all nine species were inferred using chloroplast DNA sequences and multiple cloned sequences of the nuclear ribosomal ITS region. Analysis of chloroplast and ITS sequences resolve a clade that includes the two western North American species, T. heterophylla and T. mertensiana, and a clade of Asian species within which one of the eastern North American species, T. caroliniana, is nested. The other eastern North American species, T. canadensis, is sister to the Asian clade. Tsuga chinensis from Taiwan did not group with T.
    [Show full text]
  • ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names 7Th Edition
    ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names th 7 Edition ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. M. Schori Published by All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be The Internation Seed Testing Association (ISTA) reproduced, stored in any retrieval system or transmitted Zürichstr. 50, CH-8303 Bassersdorf, Switzerland in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior ©2020 International Seed Testing Association (ISTA) permission in writing from ISTA. ISBN 978-3-906549-77-4 ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names 1st Edition 1966 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Prof P. A. Linehan 2nd Edition 1983 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. H. Pirson 3rd Edition 1988 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. W. A. Brandenburg 4th Edition 2001 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. J. H. Wiersema 5th Edition 2007 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. J. H. Wiersema 6th Edition 2013 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. J. H. Wiersema 7th Edition 2019 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. M. Schori 2 7th Edition ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names Content Preface .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Symbols and Abbreviations ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]