DOCSLIB.ORG

The National Forests and Grasslands in Texas Non-Native Invasive Plant Species Project Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The National Forests and Grasslands in Texas Non-Native Invasive Plant Species Project Environmental Assessment The National Forests and United States Department of Agriculture Grasslands in Texas Forest Service Non-Native Invasive Plant August 2008 Species Project Environmental Assessment The National Forests and Grasslands in Texas NEPA (short for the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969) is the Where is this Forest Service decision-making process that provides opportunities for project in the interested parties to give their ideas and opinions about resource Forest Service management. This input is important in helping the Forest Service to NEPA process? identify resource needs, which will shape the alternatives evaluated and lead to the formation of a decision. The following explains the steps of the NEPA process, and where the attached proposal is in that process. ; Step One–Need for a Project. The Forest Service or some other entity may identify the need for a project. YOU may bring the need for a project to the attention of the Forest Service. ; Step Two–Develop Project Proposal. The Forest Service or a project proponent develops detailed, site-specific proposal. YOU may be proponent who develops proposal or YOU can share input and ideas. ; Step Three–Scoping (Public Input). The Forest Service solicits public input on the site- specific proposal to define the scope of environmental analysis and range of alternatives to be considered. YOU provide site-specific input on issues, alternatives, and mitigation measures. ; Step Four–Develop Reasonable Range of Alternatives. If scoping determines need for EA or EIS, the Forest Service develops alternatives. YOU suggest alternatives to the proposed action during the scoping process. Step Five–Information for Formal Public Comment Period. Forest Service performs analysis of environmental effects, identifies preferred alternative, and solicits formal public comment. YOU provide timely and substantive comments on the analysis during the comment period. Step Six–Environmental Analysis & Decision. Forest Service finalizes the EA and makes decision to implement one of the alternatives. YOU can review the decision; you can appeal if you disagree, and you have “standing.” Step Seven–Appeal. Forest Service allows public 45 days following legal notice of decision to appeal. YOU may file formal Notice of Appeal. Step Eight–Implementation. Forest Service implements the project. YOU may contribute labor, equipment, or funding to implement the project. Step Nine–Monitor and Evaluate. Forest Service monitors and evaluates project results. YOU provide feedback on the project to the Forest Service. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720- 6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. The National Forests and Grasslands in Texas Non-Native Invasive Plant Species Project Environmental Assessment Contents Crosswalk of Scientific and Common Names of Species Found in the Non-Native Invasive Plant Species EA ............................................................................................... 4 CHAPTER 1—PURPOSE AND NEED .......................................................................... 11 Introduction....................................................................................................................11 Proposed Action........................................................................................................12 Adaptive Management.......................................................................................... 14 Treatment Areas.................................................................................................... 15 Project Location........................................................................................................15 Purpose and Need ..........................................................................................................23 USDA Forest Service Southern Regional Framework for Non-Native Invasive Plant Species............................................................................................23 What the NFGT Land and Resource Management Plan Says About NNIPS Management...........................................................................................................24 NFGT Desired Condition...................................................................................... 25 NNIPS Desired Conditions for all Management Areas on the NFGT.................. 26 How NNIPS Interfere with Management Area Goals .......................................... 26 Management Area Descriptions............................................................................ 27 Other Species to Watch For .................................................................................. 35 Proposed Action........................................................................................................35 Integrated Pest Management................................................................................. 35 Adaptive Management.......................................................................................... 37 Treatment Priorities and Schedule of Activities ................................................... 38 Types of Actions Considered................................................................................ 38 Cumulative Effects................................................................................................ 39 Decisions To Be Made..............................................................................................39 Public Involvement ...................................................................................................41 Tribal Consultation ...................................................................................................41 Issues..............................................................................................................................41 Non-significant Issues and Comments......................................................................42 Additional Comments Received During Public Involvement ..................................43 Significant Issues ......................................................................................................47 Issue 1: Herbicide Use .......................................................................................... 47 Issue 2: NNIPS Treatments in the Wilderness...................................................... 47 CHAPTER 2—ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................... 49 Alternatives....................................................................................................................49 Alternatives Eliminated from Detailed Consideration..............................................49 Alternative Suggestions from the Public Incorporated into the Alternatives Considered in Detail ..............................................................................................50 Alternatives Considered in Detail.............................................................................50 Alternative 1—No Action..................................................................................... 50 Alternative 2—Proposed Action........................................................................... 51 Alternative 3—Modified Proposed Action........................................................... 56 Alternative 4.......................................................................................................... 56 Alternative 5.......................................................................................................... 56 Comparison of Alternatives...........................................................................................57 1 The National Forests and Grasslands in Texas Non-Native Invasive Plant Species Project Environmental Assessment Comparison of Alternatives by Forest Plan Direction, Needs, and Activities..........57 Comparison of Alternatives by Issues ......................................................................57 Issue 1: Herbicide Use .......................................................................................... 57 Issue 2: NNIPS Treatments in the Wilderness...................................................... 57 Comparison of Alternatives by Summary of Resource Effects................................57 CHAPTER 3—DIRECT/INDIRECT AND CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ........................ 69 Detailed Analysis Introduction ......................................................................................69 Alternative 1—No Action.........................................................................................69 References to Direct/Indirect and Cumulative Effects .............................................69
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Landscaping and Gardening with Native Plants in Georgia's Coastal
    Dry woodlands with scattered canopy trees WHAT ARE NATIVE PLANTS? often support a profusion of fall blooming & Native Plants, species that grew naturally in this wildflowers such as sunflowers, goldenrods, region prior to the colonial era, are uniquely G with and blazing stars. The upland forest with adapted to local conditions. They are suited to both the highest soil moisture occurs on slopes the physical and biological conditions of their native Native Plants where resistance to fire allows a variety of areas. trees such as American beech, white oak, BENEFITS OF NATIVES Georgia’s spruce pine, and southern magnolia to Promote biodiversity grow, as well as shrubs like Carolina Lower landscape & garden maintenance once Coastal buckthorn, needle palm, red buckeye, horse established by reducing the need for fertilizer, sugar, fringe tree, and native azaleas. pesticides and watering. Where soils have higher moisture and Foster appreciation of our natural mineral levels, the ground layer is rich and heritage and the beauty of our native reminiscent of the Southern Appalachians landscape with spring flowering plants like bloodroot, Native flora provide food and shelter tailored May apple, trout lily, doll’s eyes and to wildlife Solomon’s seal. By maintaining natural habitats and mending Coastal Plain of G LOWLANDS AND WETLANDS are areas those that are fragmented, you can make a Climate Zone: 8B Eco-regions 65 - 75 where the soil is inundated or saturated for a difference whether working at the landscape portion of each year, and include both riverine level or planting in containers. THE COASTAL PLAIN OF GEORGIA in this BASICS FOR USING NATIVES and isolated wetlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacophore PHYLLANTHUS PLANTS in PHOTOPROTECTION
    Pharmacophore, 8(3) 2017, Pages: 1-10 Pharmacophore ISSN-2229-5402 Journal home page: http://www.pharmacophorejournal.com PHYLLANTHUS PLANTS IN PHOTOPROTECTION: A BROAD SPECTRUM OF MOLECULAR MECHANISMS Ivette María Menéndez-Perdomo1,2, Ángel Sánchez-Lamar1* 1. Department of Plant Biology, Faculty of Biology, University of Havana, 25St, 455 between I and J, CP 10400, Havana, Cuba 2. Current address: Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada. ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Received: 05th Mar 2017 During the past few decades, there has been an increased scientific interest to prevent or amend the Received in revised form: consequences of human exposure to the detrimental effects of sunlight ultraviolet (UV) radiation. 07th Apr 2017 Environmental UV radiation cause direct and indirect DNA damage, inducing mutations, and Accepted: triggering associated diseases, such as skin cancer. Many photoprotection strategies are currently 28th Apr 2017 available, as this has become a core issue on public healthcare. In this context, many Available online: phytocomponents had shown photoprotective properties in different experimental models. Plants 29th May 2017 in the genus Phyllanthus (Phyllanthaceae) are widely used in traditional medicine by ethnics from all over the world, and recent investigations support their genoprotective activity against UV radiation. In the present review, we summarize UV-related DNA photodamages and several Keywords: Phyllanthus, photoprotection, strategies for its prevention such as the use of phytocomponents. We update the current knowledge UV, antioxidant, DNA repair concerning the photoprotective properties of several Phyllanthus species, putting emphasis on studies carried out in the last decade. We examine different molecular mechanisms described to .
    [Show full text]
  • Likely to Have Habitat Within Iras That ALLOW Road
    Item 3a - Sensitive Species National Master List By Region and Species Group Not likely to have habitat within IRAs Not likely to have Federal Likely to have habitat that DO NOT ALLOW habitat within IRAs Candidate within IRAs that DO Likely to have habitat road (re)construction that ALLOW road Forest Service Species Under NOT ALLOW road within IRAs that ALLOW but could be (re)construction but Species Scientific Name Common Name Species Group Region ESA (re)construction? road (re)construction? affected? could be affected? Bufo boreas boreas Boreal Western Toad Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Plethodon vandykei idahoensis Coeur D'Alene Salamander Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Rana pipiens Northern Leopard Frog Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Accipiter gentilis Northern Goshawk Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Ammodramus bairdii Baird's Sparrow Bird 1 No No Yes No No Anthus spragueii Sprague's Pipit Bird 1 No No Yes No No Centrocercus urophasianus Sage Grouse Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Cygnus buccinator Trumpeter Swan Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Falco peregrinus anatum American Peregrine Falcon Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Gavia immer Common Loon Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Histrionicus histrionicus Harlequin Duck Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Lanius ludovicianus Loggerhead Shrike Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Oreortyx pictus Mountain Quail Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Otus flammeolus Flammulated Owl Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Picoides albolarvatus White-Headed Woodpecker Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Picoides arcticus Black-Backed Woodpecker Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Speotyto cunicularia Burrowing
    [Show full text]
  • The Relation Between Road Crack Vegetation and Plant Biodiversity in Urban Landscape
    Int. J. of GEOMATE, June, 2014, Vol. 6, No. 2 (Sl. No. 12), pp. 885-891 Geotech., Const. Mat. & Env., ISSN:2186-2982(P), 2186-2990(O), Japan THE RELATION BETWEEN ROAD CRACK VEGETATION AND PLANT BIODIVERSITY IN URBAN LANDSCAPE Taizo Uchida1, JunHuan Xue1,2, Daisuke Hayasaka3, Teruo Arase4, William T. Haller5 and Lyn A. Gettys5 1Faculty of Engineering, Kyushu Sangyo University, Japan; 2Suzhou Polytechnic Institute of Agriculture, China; 3Faculty of Agriculture, Kinki University, Japan; 4Faculty of Agriculture, Shinshu University, Japan; 5Center for Aquatic and Invasive Plants, University of Florida, USA ABSTRACT: The objective of this study is to collect basic information on vegetation in road crack, especially in curbside crack of road, for evaluating plant biodiversity in urban landscape. A curbside crack in this study was defined as a linear space (under 20 mm in width) between the asphalt pavement and curbstone. The species composition of plants invading curbside cracks was surveyed in 38 plots along the serial National Route, over a total length of 36.5 km, in Fukuoka City in southern Japan. In total, 113 species including native plants (83 species, 73.5%), perennial herbs (57 species, 50.4%) and woody plants (13 species, 11.5%) were recorded in curbside cracks. Buried seeds were also obtained from soil in curbside cracks, which means the cracks would possess a potential as seed bank. Incidentally, no significant differences were found in the vegetation characteristics of curbside cracks among land-use types (Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test, P > 0.05). From these results, curbside cracks would be likely to play an important role in offering habitat for plants in urban area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Quantitative Importance of Stemflow: an Evaluation of Past Research and Results from a Study in Lodgepole Pine (Pinus Contorta Var
    THE QUANTITATIVE IMPORTANCE OF STEMFLOW: AN EVALUATION OF PAST RESEARCH AND RESULTS FROM A STUDY IN LODGEPOLE PINE (PINUS CONTORTA VAR. LATIFOLIA) STANDS IN SOUTHERN BRITISH COLUMBIA by Adam Jon McKee B.A. Thompson Rivers University, 2008 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE (ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE) Thesis examining committee: Darryl Carlyle-Moses (Ph.D.), Thesis Supervisor, Assistant Professor, Dept. of Geography, Thompson Rivers University Karl Larsen (Ph.D.), Committee Member, Associate Professor, Dept. of Natural Resource Sciences, Thompson Rivers University Rita Winkler (Ph.D., R.P.F.), Committee Member, Adjunct Professor, Dept. of Natural Resource Sciences and Research Hydrologist, BC Ministry of Forests and Range Delphis F. Levia (Ph.D.), External Examiner, Associate Professor, Depts. of Geography & Plant and Soil Science, University of Delaware Spring Convocation 2011 Thompson Rivers University © Adam Jon McKee, 2010 Thesis Supervisory Committee ________________________ Dr. Darryl Carlyle-Moses, Supervisor ________________________ Dr. Karl Larsen, Committee Member ________________________ Dr. Rita Winkler, Committee Member This thesis by Adam Jon McKee was defended successfully in an oral examination on December 9, 2010 by a committee comprising: ________________________ Dr. Delphis F. Levia, External Examiner ________________________ Dr. Darryl Carlyle-Moses, Supervisor ________________________ Dr. Karl Larsen, Committee Member ________________________ Dr. Rita Winkler, Committee Member ii ________________________ Dr. Lauchlan Fraser, Chair/Coordinator of Graduate Program Committee ________________________ Dr. Tom Dickinson, Dean of Science ________________________ Dr. Peter Tsigaris, Chair of the Examining Committee This thesis is accepted in its present form by the Office of the Associate Vice President, Research and Graduate Studies as satisfying the thesis requirements for the degree Master of Science, Environmental Science.
    [Show full text]
  • Weed Identification Guide
    WEED IDENTIFICATION GUIDE Carpetgrass American Burnweed Common Chickweed Mouse-ear Chickweed Axonopus affi nis (Carpetgrass) is a mat-forming Erechtites hieracifolia (American Burnweed Stellaria media (Common Chickweed) is a mat- Cerastium vulgatum (Mouse-ear Chickweed) is a perennial that can be identifi ed by its smooth leaf or Fireweed) is a robust summer annual identifi ed forming winter annual or short-lived perennial in winter perennial with alternating leaves that are blades with rounded tips. Typically, a few long by its spiraling, alternating elliptic to lance-shaped temperate regions and is identifi ed by alternating, oblong and covered with hair. Prostrate overall, hairs are present on the leaf sheath at the base leaves with narrow, sharp-pointed bases on the shiny leaves - egg or oval, to broadly elliptic, in Mouse-ear Chickweed will have several upright of the blade. Often found coexisting in centipede lower part of the stem and clasping based on the shape. Upper leaves are without petiole, while the stems. The weed can further be identifi ed by lawns. Carpetgrass is found in the Coastal Plain of upper. American Burnweed fl owers late-spring lower leaves have sparsely, hairy long petiole. Found the white fl owers containing fi ve pedals that are the Gulf states, north to North Carolina and west to through fall and can be found throughout most of throughout North America, with the exception of notched at the ends. Mouse-ear Chickweed can be Arkansas and Oklahoma. Eastern, Central and Southern United States. the Rocky Mountains. found throughout the United States. Clumpy Rye Annual Lespedeza Dandelion Plantain, Bracted Lolium perenne (Perennial ryegrass) or Lolium Kummerowia striata (Common or Annual Taraxacum officinale (Dandelion) is a stemless Plantago aristata (Bracted Plantain) is a winter multifl orum (Annual ryegrass) is a winter annual Lespedeza) is a freely-branched summer annual perennial.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversidad Y Distribución De La Familia Asteraceae En México
    Taxonomía y florística Diversidad y distribución de la familia Asteraceae en México JOSÉ LUIS VILLASEÑOR Botanical Sciences 96 (2): 332-358, 2018 Resumen Antecedentes: La familia Asteraceae (o Compositae) en México ha llamado la atención de prominentes DOI: 10.17129/botsci.1872 botánicos en las últimas décadas, por lo que cuenta con una larga tradición de investigación de su riqueza Received: florística. Se cuenta, por lo tanto, con un gran acervo bibliográfico que permite hacer una síntesis y actua- October 2nd, 2017 lización de su conocimiento florístico a nivel nacional. Accepted: Pregunta: ¿Cuál es la riqueza actualmente conocida de Asteraceae en México? ¿Cómo se distribuye a lo February 18th, 2018 largo del territorio nacional? ¿Qué géneros o regiones requieren de estudios más detallados para mejorar Associated Editor: el conocimiento de la familia en el país? Guillermo Ibarra-Manríquez Área de estudio: México. Métodos: Se llevó a cabo una exhaustiva revisión de literatura florística y taxonómica, así como la revi- sión de unos 200,000 ejemplares de herbario, depositados en más de 20 herbarios, tanto nacionales como del extranjero. Resultados: México registra 26 tribus, 417 géneros y 3,113 especies de Asteraceae, de las cuales 3,050 son especies nativas y 1,988 (63.9 %) son endémicas del territorio nacional. Los géneros más relevantes, tanto por el número de especies como por su componente endémico, son Ageratina (164 y 135, respecti- vamente), Verbesina (164, 138) y Stevia (116, 95). Los estados con mayor número de especies son Oaxa- ca (1,040), Jalisco (956), Durango (909), Guerrero (855) y Michoacán (837). Los biomas con la mayor riqueza de géneros y especies son el bosque templado (1,906) y el matorral xerófilo (1,254).
    [Show full text]
  • Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae
    SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO BOTANY 0 NCTMBER 52 Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae Harold Robinson, A. Michael Powell, Robert M. King, andJames F. Weedin SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS City of Washington 1981 ABSTRACT Robinson, Harold, A. Michael Powell, Robert M. King, and James F. Weedin. Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae. Smithsonian Contri- butions to Botany, number 52, 28 pages, 3 tables, 1981.-Chromosome reports are provided for 145 populations, including first reports for 33 species and three genera, Garcilassa, Riencourtia, and Helianthopsis. Chromosome numbers are arranged according to Robinson’s recently broadened concept of the Heliantheae, with citations for 212 of the ca. 265 genera and 32 of the 35 subtribes. Diverse elements, including the Ambrosieae, typical Heliantheae, most Helenieae, the Tegeteae, and genera such as Arnica from the Senecioneae, are seen to share a specialized cytological history involving polyploid ancestry. The authors disagree with one another regarding the point at which such polyploidy occurred and on whether subtribes lacking higher numbers, such as the Galinsoginae, share the polyploid ancestry. Numerous examples of aneuploid decrease, secondary polyploidy, and some secondary aneuploid decreases are cited. The Marshalliinae are considered remote from other subtribes and close to the Inuleae. Evidence from related tribes favors an ultimate base of X = 10 for the Heliantheae and at least the subfamily As teroideae. OFFICIALPUBLICATION DATE is handstamped in a limited number of initial copies and is recorded in the Institution’s annual report, Smithsonian Year. SERIESCOVER DESIGN: Leaf clearing from the katsura tree Cercidiphyllumjaponicum Siebold and Zuccarini. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Main entry under title: Chromosome numbers in Compositae, XII.
    [Show full text]
  • C6 Noncarice Sedge
    CYPERACEAE etal Got Sedge? Part Two revised 24 May 2015. Draft from Designs On Nature; Up Your C 25 SEDGES, FOINS COUPANTS, LAÎCHES, ROUCHES, ROUCHETTES, & some mostly wet things in the sedge family. Because Bill Gates has been shown to eat footnotes (burp!, & enjoy it), footnotes are (italicized in the body of the text) for their protection. Someone who can spell caespitose only won way has know imagination. Much of the following is taken verbatim from other works, & often not credited. There is often not a way to paraphrase or rewrite habitat or descriptive information without changing the meaning. I am responsible for any mistakes in quoting or otherwise. This is a learning tool, & a continuation of an idea of my friend & former employer, Jock Ingels, LaFayette Home Nursery, who hoped to present more available information about a plant in one easily accessible place, instead of scattered though numerous sources. This is a work in perpetual progress, a personal learning tool, full uv misstakes, & written as a personal means instead of a public end. Redundant, repetitive, superfluous, & contradictory information is present. It is being consolidated. CYPERACEAE Sauergrasgewächse SEDGES, aka BIESIES, SEGGEN Formally described in 1789 by De Jussieu. The family name is derived from the genus name Cyperus, from the Greek kupeiros, meaning sedge. Many species are grass-like, being tufted, with long, thin, narrow leaves, jointed stems, & branched inflorescence of small flowers, & are horticulturally lumped with grasses as graminoids. Archer (2005) suggests the term graminoid be used for true grasses, & cyperoid be used for sedges. (If physical anthropologists have hominoids & hominids, why don’t we have graminoids & graminids?) There are approximately 104 genera, 4 subfamilies, 14 tribes, & about 5000 species worldwide, with 27 genera & 843 species in North America (Ball et al 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names 7Th Edition
    ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names th 7 Edition ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. M. Schori Published by All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be The Internation Seed Testing Association (ISTA) reproduced, stored in any retrieval system or transmitted Zürichstr. 50, CH-8303 Bassersdorf, Switzerland in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior ©2020 International Seed Testing Association (ISTA) permission in writing from ISTA. ISBN 978-3-906549-77-4 ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names 1st Edition 1966 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Prof P. A. Linehan 2nd Edition 1983 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. H. Pirson 3rd Edition 1988 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. W. A. Brandenburg 4th Edition 2001 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. J. H. Wiersema 5th Edition 2007 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. J. H. Wiersema 6th Edition 2013 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. J. H. Wiersema 7th Edition 2019 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. M. Schori 2 7th Edition ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names Content Preface .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Symbols and Abbreviations ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Comprehensive Review on Phyllanthus Derived Natural Products As Potential Chemotherapeutic and Immunomodulators for a Wide Range of T Human Diseases
    Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology 17 (2019) 529–537 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/bab A comprehensive review on Phyllanthus derived natural products as potential chemotherapeutic and immunomodulators for a wide range of T human diseases Mohamed Ali Seyed Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Treatment options for most cancers are still insufficient, despite developments and technology advancements. It Cancer has been postulated that the immune response to progressive tumors is insufficient due to a deficiency in afferent Phyllanthus amarus/niruri mechanisms responsible for the development of tumor-reactive T cells. Many patients treated for cancer will Phyllanthin have their cancer recurrence, often after a long remission period. This suggests that there are a small number of Hypophyllanthin tumor cells that remain alive after standard treatment(s) – alone or in combination and have been less effective Chemotherapeutic in combating metastasis that represents the most elaborate hurdle to overcome in the cure of the disease. Immunomodulation Therefore, any new effective and safe therapeutic agents will be highly demanded. To circumvent many plant extracts have attributed for their chemoprotective potentials and their influence on the human immune system. It is now well recognized that immunomodulation of immune response could provide an alternative or addition to conventional chemotherapy for a variety of disease conditions. However, many hurdles still exist. In recent years, there has been a tremendous interest either in harnessing the immune system or towards plant-derived immunomodulators as anticancer agents for their efficacy, safety and their targeted drug action and drug de- livery mechanisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Article Cytotoxicity of Selected Medicinal and Nonmedicinal Plant Extracts to Microbial and Cervical Cancer Cells
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology Volume 2012, Article ID 106746, 4 pages doi:10.1155/2012/106746 Research Article Cytotoxicity of Selected Medicinal and Nonmedicinal Plant Extracts to Microbial and Cervical Cancer Cells Gary M. Booth,1 Robert D. Malmstrom,1 Erica Kipp,2 and Alexandra Paul1 1 Department of Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA 2 The New York Botanical Garden, 200th Street and Kazimiroff Boulevard, Bronx, NY 10458-5126, USA Correspondence should be addressed to Gary M. Booth, gary [email protected] Received 2 August 2011; Accepted 16 December 2011 Academic Editor: Ikhlas A. Khan Copyright © 2012 Gary M. Booth et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This study investigated the cytotoxicity of 55 species of plants. Each plant was rated as medicinal, or nonmedicinal based on the existing literature. About 79% of the medicinal plants showed some cytotoxicity, while 75% of the nonmedicinal plants showed bioactivity. It appears that Asteraceae, Labiatae, Pinaceae, and Chenopodiaceae were particularly active against human cervical cancer cells. Based on the literature, only three of the 55 plants have been significantly investigated for cytotoxicity. It is clear that there is much toxicological work yet to be done with both medicinal and nonmedicinal plants. 1. Introduction with the most medicinal species. It was hoped that our data might show some trends of toxicity within medicinally rich There is a one-in-four chance that a drug used from any families.
    [Show full text]