Information Processing in the Cerebral Hemispheres

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Information Processing in the Cerebral Hemispheres The Two Halves of the Brain Information Processing in the Cerebral Hemispheres edited by Kenneth Hugdahl and René Westerhausen The Two Halves of the Brain The Two Halves of the Brain Information Processing in the Cerebral Hemispheres edited by Kenneth Hugdahl and Ren é Westerhausen The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England © 2010 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher. MIT Press books may be purchased at special quantity discounts for business or sales promotional use. For information, please email [email protected] or write to Special Sales Depart- ment, The MIT Press, 55 Hayward Street, Cambridge, MA 02142. This book was set in Stone Serif and Stone Sans by Toppan Best-set Premedia Limited. Printed and bound in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The two halves of the brain : information processing in the cerebral hemispheres / edited by Kenneth Hugdahl and Ren é Westerhausen. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-262-01413-7 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Cerebral dominance. 2. Laterality. I. Hugdahl, Kenneth. II. Westerhausen, Ren é , 1976– [DNLM: 1. Functional Laterality — physiology. 2. Cerebrum — physiology. 3. Dominance, Cerebral — physiology. WL 335 T974 2010] QP385.5.T86 2010 612.8a 25 — dc22 2009039297 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Contents Preface ix Introduction and Overview 1 Kenneth Hugdahl and René Westerhausen I Genetic and Evolutionary Perspectives on Hemispheric Asymmetry 19 1 Differential Gene Transcription in the Left and Right Cerebral Cortex 21 Tao Sun 2 Evolutionary Depth of Human Brain Language Areas 37 Patrick J. Gannon 3 Handedness and Cerebral Asymmetry : An Evolutionary Perspective 65 Michael C. Corballis II Hemispheric Asymmetry in Nonmammalian Species 89 4 Hemispheric Asymmetry of Songbirds 91 Isabelle George 5 The Embryonic Development of Visual Asymmetry in the Pigeon 121 Onur G ü nt ü rk ü n and Martina Manns III Neuroimaging and Hemispheric Asymmetry 143 6 Structural Indices of Asymmetry 145 Katrin Amunts 7 Asymmetry of White Matter Pathways 177 Marco Catani, Stephanie Forkel, and Michel Thiebaut de Schotten 8 Electroencephalographic and Magnetoencephalographic Indices of Hemispheric Asymmetry 211 Alfredo Brancucci vi Contents IV Hormones, Sex Differences, and Sleep Asymmetry 251 9 Sex Hormonal Effects on Hemispheric Asymmetry and Interhemispheric Interaction 253 Markus Hausmann and Ulrike Bayer 10 Sex Differences in Handedness, Brain Asymmetry, and Language Lateralization 287 Iris E. C. Sommer 11 Laterality and Sleep 313 Maria Casagrande V Asymmetry of Perception 347 12 Auditory Laterality : Recent Findings in Speech Perception 349 Patricia E. Cowell 13 Processing Asymmetries in the Visual System 379 Joseph B. Hellige, Bruno Laeng, and Chikashi Michimata 14 Integrating Auditory and Visual Asymmetry 417 Heikki H ä m ä l ä inen and Fiia Takio VI Asymmetry of Cognition 439 15 A Unifi ed Structural-Attentional Framework for Dichotic Listening 441 Stefan Pollmann 16 Cognitive Control of Auditory Laterality 469 Ren é Westerhausen and Kenneth Hugdahl 17 Hemispheric Asymmetry of Memory 499 Gr é goria Kalpouzos and Lars Nyberg VII Asymmetry in Neurological and Pediatric Disorders 531 18 Visuospatial Function and the Neglect Syndrome 533 Victoria Singh-Curry and Masud Husain 19 Hemispheric Asymmetry in Pediatric Developmental Disorders: Autism, Attention-Defi cit/Hyperactivity Disorder, and Dyslexia 561 Deborah W. Moncrieff Contents vii VIII Asymmetry in Schizophrenia and Psychosis 603 20 Lateral Differences in the Default Mode Network in Schizophrenia 605 Nathan Swanson, Tom Eichele, Godfrey Pearlson, and Vince D. Calhoun 21 The Origins of Psychosis and the Evolution of Language : Cerebral Asymmetry, Sex Chromosomes, and Speciation 621 Timothy J. Crow Contributors 663 Index 665 Preface The current volume is a follow-up to the two previous MIT Press volumes on hemi- spheric asymmetry and brain laterality in 1995 (Davidson & Hugdahl: Brain Asym- metry ) and 2003 (Hugdahl & Davidson: The Asymmetrical Brain ). The main reason for an update is that the fi eld is rapidly expanding again, after a resting period in the last decade, attracting the interest of a new generation of researchers. This renewed inter- est in hemispheric asymmetry is coming both from new theoretical approaches and applications to new areas and from the development of new measuring techniques. Another new trend in the literature is the increasing number of international research- ers engaged in hemispheric asymmetry research. The current volume clearly refl ects these trends with a mix of well-established and young researchers, refl ecting both continuity and novelty. There are 21 contributions from 11 countries (the United States, Japan, the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, New Zealand, France, the Nether- lands, Finland, Norway, and Sweden), and four different continents, covering the range of asymmetry research from the molecular to the cognitive and clinical level of explanation. It has been the ambition of the editors to present a comprehensive update on the fi eld. With all the challenges and pitfalls inherent in such an ambitious under- taking, we think that the current volume has been successful in achieving its goals. Kenneth Hugdahl and René Westerhausen Bergen, Norway, May 2009 Introduction and Overview Kenneth Hugdahl and Ren é Westerhausen Aims and Objectives In this general introduction we outline a theoretical umbrella perspective on the 21 chapters in the book, to emphasize novel theories, methods, and applications of research devoted to hemispheric asymmetry and laterality. Despite all the research devoted to hemispheric asymmetry and laterality over the last decades, this is an area in which big questions remain with respect to understanding the neural under- pinnings of cognition, and the questions being addressed in this fi eld are ones that come up for almost any cognitive science researcher. Moreover, it is not possible to advance a theoretical understanding of brain– behavior relations without taking asymmetry and laterality into account. Similarly, issues related to asymmetry and laterality penetrate most theories and models of neuropsychology and neurocogni- tive aspects of the major neurological and psychiatric diseases and disorders. However, despite the large amount of empirical data accumulated over the last decades (see Davidson & Hugdahl, 1995 ; Hugdahl & Davidson, 2003 ), theoretical understanding of the behavioral signifi cance and the neural basis of laterality remains limited. Thus, the questions of “ why, ” “ how, ” and “ what ” are as valid today as they were 30 years ago (e.g., Bradshaw & Nettleton, 1981 ; Bryden, 1982 ; Harnad et al., 1977 ; Porac & Coren, 1981 ). Our objective when compiling the current volume has therefore been not only to update the reader on the latest data and empirical results but also to provide a coher- ent theoretical perspective whenever possible to put the different chapters and con- tributions into perspective. The fi eld of hemispheric asymmetry has more or less exploded in recent years with ever new data and applications, but there has not been a corresponding explosion of theoretical advances. In this introduction, we comment on the different contributions from a theoretical perspective, moving from molecular, genetic, and evolutionary to cognitive and clinical factors in the understanding of one of the most fascinating phenomena in neuroscience, neuropsychology, psychiatry and neurology, and cognitive sciences. 2 Introduction and Overview Functional Segregation and Integration in an Asymmetrical Brain The issue of functional segregation and integration in the brain has a long history in neuroscience, with the observations of Broca and Wernicke as classic examples for the localization of language areas in the left hemisphere. However, it was not until the development of the hemodynamic neuroimaging techniques that the concept of functional segregation also gained acceptance in mainstream cognitive psychol- ogy and cognitive neuroscience ( Friston, 2005 ). Before this development, it was not uncommon to fi nd statements like “ Where is memory localized in the brain? — Everywhere and nowhere ” in standard textbooks in psychology and neuroscience. Such statements have almost totally disappeared from the literature following the introduction of positron emission tomography (PET) and functional magnetic reso- nance imaging (fMRI) as well as modern analysis techniques— for example, source localization, to supplement magnetic- and electroencephalographical (EEG) methods, such as magnetoencephalography (MEG) and EEG/ERPs. Frith (1997) provides several arguments as to why segregation, rather than integration, is the guiding principle behind the functional organization of the brain, taking arguments from evolution, economy, and the complexity of the design of the brain. In his review of EEG/MEG measures of hemispheric asymmetry, Alfredo Brancucci (chapter 8) shows how EEG was the fi rst “ objective ” measure to be used to infer asym- metry of neuronal fi ring in the two hemispheres by comparing EEG responses obtained from the left and right side of the scalp. The later development of newer recording techniques, for example, the use of MEG, opened up opportunities for
Recommended publications
  • Dissemination of Brain Inflammation in Traumatic Brain Injury
    Cellular & Molecular Immunology www.nature.com/cmi REVIEW ARTICLE Dissemination of brain inflammation in traumatic brain injury Kaibin Shi1,2,3, Jianning Zhang1, Jing-fei Dong4 and Fu-Dong Shi1,2,3 Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is recognized as a global health problem due to its increasing occurrence, challenging treatment, and persistent impacts on brain pathophysiology. Neural cell death in patients with TBI swiftly causes inflammation in the injured brain areas, which is recognized as focal brain inflammation. Focal brain inflammation causes secondary brain injury by exacerbating brain edema and neuronal death, while also exerting divergent beneficial effects, such as sealing the damaged limitans and removing cellular debris. Recent evidence from patients with TBI and studies on animal models suggest that brain inflammation after TBI is not only restricted to the focal lesion but also disseminates to remote areas of the brain. The dissemination of inflammation has been detected within days after the primary injury and persists chronically. This state of inflammation may be related to remote complications of TBI in patients, such as hyperthermia and hypopituitarism, and may lead to progressive neurodegeneration, such as chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Future studies should focus on understanding the mechanisms that govern the initiation and propagation of brain inflammation after TBI and its impacts on post-trauma brain pathology. Keywords: disseminated brain inflammation; traumatic brain injury; microglia; post-injury neurodegeneration Cellular & Molecular Immunology (2019) 16:523–530; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41423-019-0213-5 INTRODUCTION the first responders to the injury, followed by activated astrocytes Traumatic brain injury (TBI) encompasses mechanical brain injuries and endothelial cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Network Architecture of the Cerebral Nuclei (Basal Ganglia) Association and Commissural Connectome
    Network architecture of the cerebral nuclei (basal ganglia) association and commissural connectome Larry W. Swansona,1, Olaf Spornsb, and Joel D. Hahna aDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089; and bDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405 Contributed by Larry W. Swanson, August 10, 2016 (sent for review July 18, 2016; reviewed by Ann M. Graybiel and Liqun Luo) The cerebral nuclei form the ventral division of the cerebral hemi- same basic strategy and methodology applied to the rat cerebral sphere and are thought to play an important role in neural systems cortical association macroconnectome (10) but with additional an- controlling somatic movement and motivation. Network analysis alytical approaches and curation tools. In this approach a macro- was used to define global architectural features of intrinsic cerebral connection is defined as a monosynaptic axonal (directed, from/to) nuclei circuitry in one hemisphere (association connections) and connection between two nervous system gray matter regions or between hemispheres (commissural connections). The analysis was between a gray matter region and another part of the body (such as based on more than 4,000 reports of histologically defined axonal a muscle) (11, 12). All 45 gray matter regions of the cerebral nuclei connections involving all 45 gray matter regions of the rat cerebral on each side of the brain were included in the analysis. The goal of nuclei and revealed the existence of four asymmetrically intercon- this analysis was to provide global, high-level, design principles of nected modules. The modules form four topographically distinct intrinsic cerebral nuclei circuitry as a framework for more detailed research at the meso-, micro-, and nanolevels of analysis (13).
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis and Identification of Bite Marks in Forensic Casework
    ORIGINAL | http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/1994-8220.1000102 J Psychiatry 2014;17:475-482 Handedness in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder in an afrikaner founder population RH Mataboge¹*, M Joubert¹, JC Jordaan², F Reyneke2, JL Roos1 ¹University of Pretoria, Department of Psychiatry, Pretoria, South Africa ²University of Pretoria, Department of Statistics, Pretoria, South Africa Abstract Objective: An association between the Leucine-rich repeat trans membrane neuronal 1 gene (LRRTM1), schizophrenia/ schizoaffective disorder and handedness was recently claimed to be established. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that Afrikaner patients with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder are more non-right handed than their non-affected first- degree relatives and that of two separate control groups. The association between handedness, gender and age at onset of illness in the patients group was also determined. Method: Two cross-sectional studies were carried out, which compared the handedness of a group of 100 (30 females and 70 males) Afrikaner patients with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder, their non-affected first-degree relatives, and two separate control groups. Handedness was determined by the Edinburg Handedness Inventory (EHI). Results: Patients were found to be more right-handed than expected with only 17 out of 100 being non-right-handed compared to 11 out of 100 non-affected relatives; 36 out of 100 students and 75 out of 500 non- affected Afrikaner participants. The students were significantly more non-right handed than the patient and family groups but no difference in handedness was found when comparing the patients, family members and 500 participant control group. There was no significant difference between age at onset of illness and handedness.
    [Show full text]
  • In Search of the Biological Roots of Typical and Atypical Human Brain Asymmetry
    Accepted Manuscript In search of the biological roots of typical and atypical human brain asymmetry Clyde Francks PII: S1571-0645(19)30099-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2019.07.004 Reference: PLREV 1124 To appear in: Physics of Life Reviews Received date: 9 July 2019 Accepted date: 12 July 2019 Please cite this article in press as: Francks C. In search of the biological roots of typical and atypical human brain asymmetry. Phys Life Rev (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2019.07.004 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. In search of the biological roots of typical and atypical human brain asymmetry. Comment on “Phenotypes in hemispheric functional segregation? Perspectives and challenges” by Guy Vingerhoets. Clyde Francks1,2 1Language & Genetics Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, the Netherlands 2Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Email address: [email protected] Keywords: Brain asymmetry; brain functions; laterality; human genetics; left-right axis; brain hemispheres. In this comprehensive and insightful review, Vingerhoets [1] discusses the multi-dimensional nature of inter-individual variation in functional brain asymmetry, and its potential relevance to behavioural variation and psychopathology.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Morphometric Techniques Applied to The
    UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID ESCUELA TÉCNICA SUPERIOR DE INGENIEROS DE TELECOMUNICACIÓN ADVANCED MORPHOMETRIC TECHNIQUES APPLIED TO THE STUDY OF HUMAN BRAIN ANATOMY TESIS DOCTORAL Yasser Alemán Gómez Ingeniero en Tecnologías Nucleares y Energéticas Máster en Neurociencias Madrid, 2015 DEPARTAMENTO DE INGENIERÍA ELECTRÓNICA ESCUELA TÉCNICA SUPERIOR DE INGENIEROS DE TELECOMUNICACIÓN PHD THESIS ADVANCED MORPHOMETRIC TECHNIQUES APPLIED TO THE STUDY OF HUMAN BRAIN ANATOMY AUTHOR Yasser Alemán Gómez Ing. en Tecnologías Nucleares y Energéticas MSc en Neurociencias ADVISOR Manuel Desco Menéndez, MScE, MD, PhD Madrid, 2015 Departamento de Ingeniería Electrónica Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Telecomunicación Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Ph.D. Thesis Advanced morphometric techniques applied to the study of human brain anatomy Tesis doctoral Técnicas avanzadas de morfometría aplicadas al estudio de la anatomía cerebral humana Author: Yasser Alemán Gómez Advisor: Manuel Desco Menéndez Committee: Andrés Santos Lleó Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain Javier Pascau Gonzalez-Garzón Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Madrid, Spain Raymond Salvador Civil FIDMAG – Germanes Hospitalàries, Barcelona, Spain Pablo Campo Martínez-Lage Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain Juan Domingo Gispert López Universidad Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain María Jesús Ledesma Carbayo Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain Juan José Vaquero López Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Madrid, Spain Esta Tesis ha sido desarrollada en el Laboratorio de Imagen Médica de la Unidad de Medicina y Cirugía Experimental del Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón y en colaboración con el Servicio de Psiquiatría del Niño y del Adolescente del Departamento de Psiquiatría del Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón de Madrid, España. Tribunal nombrado por el Sr.
    [Show full text]
  • Algid Ma. 33S~3
    3~?<? Algid Ma. 33S~3 DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF BIOFEEDBACK INPUT ON LOWERING FRONTALIS ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC LEVELS IN RIGHT AND LEFT HANDERS DISSERTATION Presented to the Graduate Council of the University of North Texas in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By Kenneth N. Walker, B.S., M.Ed, Denton, Texas August, 1990 Walker, Kenneth N. Differential Effects of Biofeedback Input on Lowering Frontalis Electromyographic Levels In Right and Left Handers. Doctor of Philosophy (Health Psychology/Behavioral Medicine), August 1990, 70 pages, 3 tables, 6 figures, references, 73 titles. This investigation was an attempt to replicate and expand previous research which suggested that laterality of electromyographic biofeedback input had a significant effect in lowering frontalis muscle activity. In 1984 Ginn and Harrell conducted a study in which they reported that subjects receiving left ear only audio biofeedback had significantly greater reductions in frontalis muscle activity than those receiving right ear only or both ear feedback. This study was limited to one biofeedback session and subjects were selected based on demonstration of right hand/ear dominance. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the left ear effect reported by Ginn and Harrell could be replicated. Furthermore, the current investigation sought to extend the previous finding to left handed subjects and explore the stability of the effect, if found, by adding a second biofeedback session. Subjects were 96 students recruited from undergraduate psychology classes. They were screened for handedness by the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory which resulted in identification of 48 right handers and 48 left handers.
    [Show full text]
  • Tool-Use and the Chimpanzee Brain: an Investigation of Gray and White Matter, and a Focused Study of Inferior Parietal Microstructure
    Tool-use and the Chimpanzee Brain: An Investigation of Gray and White Matter, and a Focused Study of Inferior Parietal Microstructure by Laura Denise Reyes A.B. in Psychology, June 2008, Dartmouth College M.A. in Anthropology, May 2011, New Mexico State University M.Phil in Hominid Paleobiology, June 2013, The George Washington University A Dissertation submitted to The Faculty of The Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of The George Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 31, 2017 Chet C. Sherwood Professor of Anthropology The Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of The George Washington University certifies that Laura D. Reyes has passed the Final Examination for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy as of May 3, 2017. This is the final and approved form of the dissertation. Tool-use and the Chimpanzee Brain: An Investigation of Gray and White Matter, and a Focused Study of Inferior Parietal Microstructure Laura Denise Reyes Dissertation Research Committee: Chet C. Sherwood, Professor of Anthropology, Dissertation Director Kimberley Phillips, Professor of Psychology, Trinity University, Committee Member Scott Mackey, Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Committee Member ii © Copyright 2017 by Laura Denise Reyes All rights reserved. iii Acknowledgments The author would like to thank her parents, Loretta and Francisco Reyes; her grandparents, Celia and Ralph Lopez and Paula and Francisco Reyes; and all of her family and friends who offered support during the course of her education, especially Amelia Villaseñor and Chrisandra Kufeldt. The author acknowledges the dissertation committee, Brenda Bradley (Chair), Chet Sherwood (Advisor), David Braun, Scott Mackey, Kimberley Phillips, and Sarah Shomstein, as well as the following funding sources: National Science Foundation Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement Grant BCS-1455629 and GWU Provost’s Fellowship.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Brain Anatomy
    Chapter 2 Basic Brain Anatomy Where this icon appears, visit The Brain http://go.jblearning.com/ManascoCWS to view the corresponding video. The average weight of an adult human brain is about 3 pounds. That is about the weight of a single small To understand how a part of the brain is disordered by cantaloupe or six grapefruits. If a human brain was damage or disease, speech-language pathologists must placed on a tray, it would look like a pretty unim- first know a few facts about the anatomy of the brain pressive mass of gray lumpy tissue (Luria, 1973). In in general and how a normal and healthy brain func- fact, for most of history the brain was thought to be tions. Readers can use the anatomy presented here as an utterly useless piece of flesh housed in the skull. a reference, review, and jumping off point to under- The Egyptians believed that the heart was the seat standing the consequences of damage to the structures of human intelligence, and as such, the brain was discussed. This chapter begins with the big picture promptly removed during mummification. In his and works down into the specifics of brain anatomy. essay On Sleep and Sleeplessness, Aristotle argued that the brain is a complex cooling mechanism for our bodies that works primarily to help cool and The Central Nervous condense water vapors rising in our bodies (Aristo- tle, republished 2011). He also established a strong System argument in this same essay for why infants should not drink wine. The basis for this argument was that The nervous system is divided into two major sec- infants already have Central nervous tions: the central nervous system and the peripheral too much moisture system The brain and nervous system.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hands to Say It
    Issue 91, February 2008 www.proteinspotlight.org The hands to say it Vivienne Baillie Gerritsen When I was a little girl, I thought that my left-handed classmates were special. I envied their difference. And I used to marvel at the way they crouched over their desk, embracing something invisible as they did their best to avoid smudging ink all over their sheet of paper. Left-handedness is special. But so is right-handedness. Humans are not the only animals to make use of their hands – or claws, or paws, or hooves - but they are the only ones who show a marked preference for either the left one, or the right one. If this is so, there must be a reason for it. And not only must there be a reason but it must translate a certain structure of our brain: an asymmetry somewhere. Indeed, our brain is divided into two hemispheres which are dedicated to processing different activities. One side looks after our dreams, while the other is far more down to earth. LRRTM1 is the first protein to have been discovered which seems to be directly involved in this brain asymmetry. Consequently, it influences the handedness of a human-being and, more astonishingly, may also predispose individuals to psychotic troubles such as schizophrenia. don’t have a distinct preference for one hand over the other. The passing of roles from hand to mind expresses a particular brain structure. In turn, the progressive use of speech has continued to mould our brain into a shape peculiar to the human species.
    [Show full text]
  • 01 05 Lateral Surface of the Brain-NOTES.Pdf
    Lateral Surface of the Brain Medical Neuroscience | Tutorial Notes Lateral Surface of the Brain 1 MAP TO NEUROSCIENCE CORE CONCEPTS NCC1. The brain is the body's most complex organ. LEARNING OBJECTIVES After study of the assigned learning materials, the student will: 1. Demonstrate the four paired lobes of the cerebral cortex and describe the boundaries of each. 2. Sketch the major features of each cerebral lobe, as seen from the lateral view, identifying major gyri and sulci that characterize each lobe. NARRATIVE by Leonard E. WHITE and Nell B. CANT Duke Institute for Brain Sciences Department of Neurobiology Duke University School of Medicine Overview When you view the lateral aspect of a human brain specimen (see Figures A3A and A102), three structures are usually visible: the cerebral hemispheres, the cerebellum, and part of the brainstem (although the brainstem is not visible in the specimen photographed in lateral view for Fig. 1 below). The spinal cord has usually been severed (but we’ll consider the spinal cord later), and the rest of the subdivisions are hidden from lateral view by the hemispheres. The diencephalon and the rest of the brainstem are visible on the medial surface of a brain that has been cut in the midsagittal plane. Parts of all of the subdivisions are also visible from the ventral surface of the whole brain. Over the next several tutorials, you will find video demonstrations (from the brain anatomy lab) and photographs (in the tutorial notes) of these brain surfaces, and sufficient detail in the narrative to appreciate the overall organization of the parts of the brain that are visible from each perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • Function of Cerebral Cortex
    FUNCTION OF CEREBRAL CORTEX Course: Neuropsychology CC-6 (M.A PSYCHOLOGY SEM II); Unit I By Dr. Priyanka Kumari Assistant Professor Institute of Psychological Research and Service Patna University Contact No.7654991023; E-mail- [email protected] The cerebral cortex—the thin outer covering of the brain-is the part of the brain responsible for our ability to reason, plan, remember, and imagine. Cerebral Cortex accounts for our impressive capacity to process and transform information. The cerebral cortex is only about one-eighth of an inch thick, but it contains billions of neurons, each connected to thousands of others. The predominance of cell bodies gives the cortex a brownish gray colour. Because of its appearance, the cortex is often referred to as gray matter. Beneath the cortex are myelin-sheathed axons connecting the neurons of the cortex with those of other parts of the brain. The large concentrations of myelin make this tissue look whitish and opaque, and hence it is often referred to as white matter. The cortex is divided into two nearly symmetrical halves, the cerebral hemispheres . Thus, many of the structures of the cerebral cortex appear in both the left and right cerebral hemispheres. The two hemispheres appear to be somewhat specialized in the functions they perform. The cerebral hemispheres are folded into many ridges and grooves, which greatly increase their surface area. Each hemisphere is usually described, on the basis of the largest of these grooves or fissures, as being divided into four distinct regions or lobes. The four lobes are: • Frontal, • Parietal, • Occipital, and • Temporal.
    [Show full text]
  • Psichologijos Žodynas Dictionary of Psychology
    ANGLŲ–LIETUVIŲ KALBŲ PSICHOLOGIJOS ŽODYNAS ENGLISH–LITHUANIAN DICTIONARY OF PSYCHOLOGY VILNIAUS UNIVERSITETAS Albinas Bagdonas Eglė Rimkutė ANGLŲ–LIETUVIŲ KALBŲ PSICHOLOGIJOS ŽODYNAS Apie 17 000 žodžių ENGLISH–LITHUANIAN DICTIONARY OF PSYCHOLOGY About 17 000 words VILNIAUS UNIVERSITETO LEIDYKLA VILNIUS 2013 UDK 159.9(038) Ba-119 Apsvarstė ir rekomendavo išleisti Vilniaus universiteto Filosofijos fakulteto taryba (2013 m. kovo 6 d.; protokolas Nr. 2) RECENZENTAI: prof. Audronė LINIAUSKAITĖ Klaipėdos universitetas doc. Dalia NASVYTIENĖ Lietuvos edukologijos universitetas TERMINOLOGIJOS KONSULTANTĖ dr. Palmira ZEMLEVIČIŪTĖ REDAKCINĖ KOMISIJA: Albinas BAGDONAS Vida JAKUTIENĖ Birutė POCIŪTĖ Gintautas VALICKAS Žodynas parengtas įgyvendinant Europos socialinio fondo remiamą projektą „Pripažįstamos kvalifikacijos neturinčių psichologų tikslinis perkvalifikavimas pagal Vilniaus universiteto bakalauro ir magistro studijų programas – VUPSIS“ (2011 m. rugsėjo 29 d. sutartis Nr. VP1-2.3.- ŠMM-04-V-02-001/Pars-13700-2068). Pirminis žodyno variantas (1999–2010 m.) rengtas Vilniaus universiteto Specialiosios psichologijos laboratorijos lėšomis. ISBN 978-609-459-226-3 © Albinas Bagdonas, 2013 © Eglė Rimkutė, 2013 © VU Specialiosios psichologijos laboratorija, 2013 © Vilniaus universitetas, 2013 PRATARMĖ Sparčiai plėtojantis globalizacijos proce- atvejus, kai jų vertimas į lietuvių kalbą gali sams, informacinėms technologijoms, ne- kelti sunkumų), tik tam tikroms socialinėms išvengiamai didėja ir anglų kalbos, kaip ir etninėms grupėms būdingų žodžių, slengo,
    [Show full text]