DOCSLIB.ORG

The Neurobiology of Reading Differs for Deaf and Hearing Adults Karen

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Neurobiology of Reading Differs for Deaf and Hearing Adults Karen The Neurobiology of Reading Differs for Deaf and Hearing Adults Karen Emmorey Please cite as: Emmorey, K. (2020). The neurobiology of reading differs for deaf and hearing adults. In M. Marschark and H. Knoors (Eds). Oxford Handbook of Deaf Studies in Learning and Cognition, pp. 347–359, Oxford University Press. Running head: The neurobiology of reading Karen Emmorey Laboratory for Language and Cognitive Neuroscience 6495 Alvarado Road, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92120 USA [email protected] Acknowledgements This work was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (DC014246) and grants from the National Science Foundation (BCS-1651372; BCS-1756403). The neurobiology of reading 2 Abstract Recent neuroimaging and electrophysiological evidence reveal how the reading system successfully adapts when phonological codes are relatively coarse-grained due to reduced auditory input during development. New evidence suggests that the optimal end-state for the reading system may differ for deaf versus hearing adults and indicates that certain neural patterns that are maladaptive for hearing readers may be beneficial for deaf readers. This chapter focuses on deaf adults who are signers and have achieved reading success. Although the left-hemisphere dominant reading circuit is largely similar, skilled deaf readers exhibit a more bilateral neural response to written words and sentences compared to their hearing peers, as measured by event- related potentials and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Skilled deaf readers may also rely more on neural regions involved in semantic processing compared to hearing readers. Overall, emerging evidence indicates that the neural markers for reading skill may differ for deaf and hearing adults. Keywords: deaf, reading, visual word recognition, sentence reading, fMRI, ERP The neurobiology of reading 3 Reading is a complex visual and linguistic process that differs for deaf and hearing adults because of their distinct sensory and language experiences. Changes in visual processing that stem from a lack of auditory input during development and imprecise phonological representations that result from reduced access to auditory speech can both alter the nature of the reading process. Although a great deal is known about the neural circuitry that supports reading in typical hearing adults (e.g., Dehaene, 2009; Pugh et al., 2001), much less is known about the neural regions that support skilled reading in deaf individuals. This chapter reviews our current understanding of the neurocognitive underpinnings of reading skill in deaf adults who grew up with a sign language (i.e., exposed to a sign language in early childhood). The review focuses primarily on deaf adult signers because a) they are less likely to have experienced language deprivation during childhood (e.g., Humphries et al., 2012; Glickman & Hall, 2018), which may have distinct effects on reading acquisition and b) they are less likely to access phonological codes when reading compared to deaf adults who acquired only a spoken language (e.g., Hirshorn et al., 2015; Koo, Kelly, LaSasso, & Eden, 2008). Thus, deaf signers may be more likely to exhibit neural plasticity within the reading system and may achieve reading success through alternative pathways compared to hearing speakers. All neurobiological theories of reading must specify the neurocognitive processes involved in comprehending the elemental units of written language: visually encountered words. Thus, this review first examines how the brain recognizes individual words and the factors that influence the brain’s response to printed words in deaf compared to hearing readers. The second (shorter) section of this review describes the few neuroimaging and neurophysiological studies that have investigated the processes involved in sentence-level reading in deaf compared to The neurobiology of reading 4 hearing adults. The final section concludes with a summary and suggestions for future research directions. <1> Visual Word Recognition Word reading in the hearing population is supported by a distributed neural circuitry associated with specific component processes (i.e., phonology, orthography, and semantics). Briefly, skilled word reading in hearing individuals involves a left-hemisphere dominant system comprised of temporal-parietal cortex which maps visually printed words onto phonological representations (and also binds phonological information to semantic representations), ventral inferior temporal cortex which maps visual features onto orthographic representations and includes the Visual Word Form Area, and the inferior frontal cortex which is involved in both semantic and phonological processing of written words (for review see Dehaene, 2009). Figure 1 provides a schematic illustration of these brain regions. Figure 1. Schematic of the reading circuit in the left hemisphere. The neurobiology of reading 5 In addition, much is known about the neural dynamics of word reading in the hearing population as revealed by event-related potentials (ERPs). Specifically, many studies using the visual masked priming paradigm have identified a cascade of ERP components that a) identify low-level visual features of letters (the N/P150), b) process sublexical orthographic and phonological representations (the N250), and c) process whole-word representations (the N400) (see Grainger & Holcomb, 2009, for review). In visual masked priming, orthographic, phonological, or semantic information from a briefly presented masked prime is integrated with information extracted from the target word, and the prime and target are processed as a single perceptual event – readers are unaware of seeing the prime word. Thus, priming is not subject to strategic effects, and manipulating the type of priming (e.g., phonological, orthographic, or semantic) reveals the linguistic sensitivity of various ERP components. The N170 is another ERP component that has been studied extensively in hearing readers and that is elicited by single written words (not masked). The N170 is left-lateralized in hearing adults (i.e., larger over the left hemisphere) and appears to index fine-tuning of orthographic representations as the N170 amplitude is larger to words than to other visual stimuli, such as symbol strings (e.g., Rossion, Joyce, Cottrell, & Tarr, 2003; Maurer, Brandeis, & McCandliss, 2005). In this section, recent neuroimaging and electrophysiological studies of word reading are reviewed that examine how the brain processes written words in deaf adults and whether these processes differ from hearing readers. <2> The Visual Word Form Area The visual word form area (VWFA) is located along the underside (ventral location) of the inferior temporal cortex (see Figure 1). This region preferentially responds to written words and The neurobiology of reading 6 encodes abstract orthographic representations (e.g., the neural response is insensitive to case, font, or script; see Dehaene & Cohen, 2011, for review). As hearing children learn to read, this region becomes tuned to print, with better readers exhibiting stronger activation. Adults who are illiterate do not show increased neural activity in the VWFA when viewing written words compared to similar non-word visual stimuli, but VWFA activation increases with increased literacy. Thus far, most studies have found no difference in VWFA activation between deaf and hearing readers (Aparicio, Gounot, Demont, & Metz-Lutz, 2007; Emmorey, Weisberg, McCullough, & Petrich, 2013; Waters et al., 2007; Wang, Caramazza, Peele, Han, & Bi, 2015). The location and extent of activation within the VWFA when recognizing visual words is similar for both groups, but how this region connects to other brain areas differs. Wang et al. (2015) found that the functional connectivity between the VWFA and auditory speech areas in left superior temporal cortex was reduced for congenitally deaf readers, but the connectivity between the VWFA and the frontal and parietal regions of the reading circuit was similar for deaf and hearing readers. The authors concluded that auditory speech experience does not significantly alter the location or response strength of the VWFA. However, there are mixed results with respect to whether reading skill impacts neural activity within the VWFA for deaf adults. Corina, Lawyer, Hauser, and Hirshorn (2013) found greater activation for more proficient deaf readers, while Emmorey, McCullough, and Weisberg (2016) found no difference between skilled and less-skilled deaf readers in this region. Studies that compared deaf readers with more skilled hearing readers have also reported no group differences in activation in this region (Aparicio et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2015; Waters et al., 2007). These latter findings suggest that a primary marker of poor reading in hearing individuals, The neurobiology of reading 7 namely reduced activation in the VWFA (e.g., Hoeft et al., 2007), may not constitute an indicator of reading skill for deaf individuals. Rather, Emmorey et al. (2016) found that better reading ability in deaf adults was associated with increased neural activation in a region that was in front of (anterior to) the VWFA, when deaf readers made a semantic decision about words. Emmorey et al. speculated that this region may be involved in mapping orthographic word-level representations onto semantic representations (e.g., Purcell, Shea, & Rapp, 2014) and that better deaf readers may have stronger or more finely-tuned links between orthographic and semantic lexical representations.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Analysis and Identification of Bite Marks in Forensic Casework
    ORIGINAL | http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/1994-8220.1000102 J Psychiatry 2014;17:475-482 Handedness in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder in an afrikaner founder population RH Mataboge¹*, M Joubert¹, JC Jordaan², F Reyneke2, JL Roos1 ¹University of Pretoria, Department of Psychiatry, Pretoria, South Africa ²University of Pretoria, Department of Statistics, Pretoria, South Africa Abstract Objective: An association between the Leucine-rich repeat trans membrane neuronal 1 gene (LRRTM1), schizophrenia/ schizoaffective disorder and handedness was recently claimed to be established. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that Afrikaner patients with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder are more non-right handed than their non-affected first- degree relatives and that of two separate control groups. The association between handedness, gender and age at onset of illness in the patients group was also determined. Method: Two cross-sectional studies were carried out, which compared the handedness of a group of 100 (30 females and 70 males) Afrikaner patients with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder, their non-affected first-degree relatives, and two separate control groups. Handedness was determined by the Edinburg Handedness Inventory (EHI). Results: Patients were found to be more right-handed than expected with only 17 out of 100 being non-right-handed compared to 11 out of 100 non-affected relatives; 36 out of 100 students and 75 out of 500 non- affected Afrikaner participants. The students were significantly more non-right handed than the patient and family groups but no difference in handedness was found when comparing the patients, family members and 500 participant control group. There was no significant difference between age at onset of illness and handedness.
    [Show full text]
  • Psichologijos Žodynas Dictionary of Psychology
    ANGLŲ–LIETUVIŲ KALBŲ PSICHOLOGIJOS ŽODYNAS ENGLISH–LITHUANIAN DICTIONARY OF PSYCHOLOGY VILNIAUS UNIVERSITETAS Albinas Bagdonas Eglė Rimkutė ANGLŲ–LIETUVIŲ KALBŲ PSICHOLOGIJOS ŽODYNAS Apie 17 000 žodžių ENGLISH–LITHUANIAN DICTIONARY OF PSYCHOLOGY About 17 000 words VILNIAUS UNIVERSITETO LEIDYKLA VILNIUS 2013 UDK 159.9(038) Ba-119 Apsvarstė ir rekomendavo išleisti Vilniaus universiteto Filosofijos fakulteto taryba (2013 m. kovo 6 d.; protokolas Nr. 2) RECENZENTAI: prof. Audronė LINIAUSKAITĖ Klaipėdos universitetas doc. Dalia NASVYTIENĖ Lietuvos edukologijos universitetas TERMINOLOGIJOS KONSULTANTĖ dr. Palmira ZEMLEVIČIŪTĖ REDAKCINĖ KOMISIJA: Albinas BAGDONAS Vida JAKUTIENĖ Birutė POCIŪTĖ Gintautas VALICKAS Žodynas parengtas įgyvendinant Europos socialinio fondo remiamą projektą „Pripažįstamos kvalifikacijos neturinčių psichologų tikslinis perkvalifikavimas pagal Vilniaus universiteto bakalauro ir magistro studijų programas – VUPSIS“ (2011 m. rugsėjo 29 d. sutartis Nr. VP1-2.3.- ŠMM-04-V-02-001/Pars-13700-2068). Pirminis žodyno variantas (1999–2010 m.) rengtas Vilniaus universiteto Specialiosios psichologijos laboratorijos lėšomis. ISBN 978-609-459-226-3 © Albinas Bagdonas, 2013 © Eglė Rimkutė, 2013 © VU Specialiosios psichologijos laboratorija, 2013 © Vilniaus universitetas, 2013 PRATARMĖ Sparčiai plėtojantis globalizacijos proce- atvejus, kai jų vertimas į lietuvių kalbą gali sams, informacinėms technologijoms, ne- kelti sunkumų), tik tam tikroms socialinėms išvengiamai didėja ir anglų kalbos, kaip ir etninėms grupėms būdingų žodžių, slengo,
    [Show full text]
  • Enhanced Imagery Abilities in Deaf and Hearing ASL Signers*
    Cognition, 46 (1993) 139-181 Visual imagery and visual-spatial language: Enhanced imagery abilities in deaf and hearing ASL signers* Karen Emmorey,” Stephen M. Kosslynb and Ursula Bellugi” “Laboratory for Cognitive Neuroscience, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA bDepartment of Psychology and Social Relations, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA Received April 22, 1991, final version accepted September 7, 1992 Abstract Emmorey, K., Kosslyn, S.M., and Bellugi, U., 1993. Visual imagery and visual-spatial language: Enhanced imagery abilities in deaf and hearing ASL signers. Cognition, 46: 139-181. The ability to generate visual mental images, to maintain them, and to rotate them was studied in deaf signers of American Sign Language (ASL), hearing signers who have deaf parents, and hearing non-signers. These abilities are hypothesized to be integral to the production and comprehension of ASL. Results indicate that both deaf and hearing ASL signers have an enhanced ability to generate relatively complex images and to detect mirror image reversals. In contrast, there were no group differences in ability to maintain information in images for brief periods or to imagine objects rotating. Signers’ enhanced visual imagery abilities may be tied to specific linguistic requirements of ASL (referent visualization, topological classifiers, perspective shift, and reversals during sign perception). Correspondence to: Dr. Karen Emmorey, Laboratory for Cognitive Neuroscience, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA; e-mail: [email protected]. *This work was supported by NIH grant HD-13249 awarded to Ursula Bellugi and Karen Emmorey, as well as NIH grants DC-00146, DC-0021 and NSF grant BNS86-09085.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE Karen Emmorey 6630 Towhee Lane
    CURRICULUM VITAE Karen Emmorey 6630 Towhee Lane Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences Carlsbad, CA 92011 San Diego State University Home: (760) 931-8152 Director, Laboratory for Language and Cognitive Neuroscience 6495 Alvarado Road, Suite 200 Office: (619) 594-8080 San Diego, CA 92120 Lab: (619) 594-8049 [email protected] Website: http://slhs.sdsu.edu/llcn/ EDUCATION University of California, Los Angeles Ph.D. 1987 Linguistics University of California, Los Angeles M.A. 1984 Linguistics University of California, Los Angeles B.A. 1982 Linguistics, Psychology EMPLOYMENT San Diego State University Distinguished Professor 2013 – present San Diego State University Professor 2005 – 2013 School of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences San Diego State University Adjunct Professor 2006 – present Department of Psychology The University of California, Adjunct Professor 1998 – present San Diego Department of Psychology The Salk Institute Associate Director 2002 – 2005 Lab for Cognitive Neuroscience The Salk Institute Senior Staff Scientist 1996 – 2005 The Salk Institute Staff Scientist 1990 – 1996 The Salk Institute Senior Research Associate 1988 – 1990 The Salk Institute Post-Doctoral Fellow 1987 – 1988 HONORS Fellow, Linguistic Society of America 2019 Chair, Society for the Neurobiology of Language 2018 Chair, Linguistics Section of the AAAS 2014 Distinguished Professor, SDSU 2013 Outstanding Faculty Alumni Award 2011 Fellow, American Association for the Advancement for Science 2010 Top 25 Service Award, SDSU 2009 DISTINGUISHED SERVICE Language
    [Show full text]
  • Handedness and Laterality: Relations to General and Creative Intelligences
    Handedness and Laterality: Relations to General and Creative Intelligences. Meghan Tuohy 10339410 Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the Higher Diploma in Arts in Psychology (HDPSYAG) at DBS School of Arts, Dublin. Supervisor: Dr Lucie Corcoran Head of Department: Dr S. Eccles March 2018 Department of Psychology DBS School of Arts 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………………4 Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………..5 Chapter: 1. Introduction……………………………………………………………….......6 1.1 General Introduction…………………………………………………………...6 1.2 Right and Left Handedness…..………………………………………………..8 1.3 Strength of Handedness.....……………………………………………………12 1.4 Intelligence………………………………….……………………………….....12 1.5 Rationale of the Study…………………………………………………………13 1.6 Hypotheses………………………………..……………………………………16 Chapter 2: Methods……………………………………………………………………… 17 2.1 Participants…………………………………………………………………... 17 2.2 Design………………………………………………………………………… 17 2.3 Materials……………………………………………………………………… 19 2.3.1 New Non-Reading Intelligence Test (NNRIT)………………….19 2.3.2 Laterality Preference Questionnaire (LPQ)…………………..20 2.3.3 Wallas and Kogans’s Assessment of Creativity………………21 2.4 Procedure…………………………………………………………………… 22 2.5 Data Analysis………………………………………………………………. 23 Chapter 3: Results……………………………………………………………………... 24 3 3.1 Hypotheses 1 and 2 …………………………………………………….… 24 3.2 Hypothesis 3 ……………………………………………………………… 25 3.3 Hypothesis 4………………………………………………………………. 27 3.4 Other Relevant Findings………………………………………………… 30 Chapter 4: Discussion……………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Left -Handedness Laterality Characteristics and Their
    LEFT -HANDEDNESS LATERALITY CHARACTERISTICS AND THEIR EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATIONS by Margaret MacDonald Clark, M.A., Ed.B. Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy University of Glasgow 1953 ProQuest Number: 13838552 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 13838552 Published by ProQuest LLC(2019). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 ii PREFACE Lack of knowledge concerning left-handedness springs from the multiplicity of studies and contradictory nature of the findings on the various aspects of laterality, father than any insufficiency of material on the subject. The absence of any single authoritative work and extensiveness of existing material make necessary for a full appreciation of the problem a study more prolonged than the average interested person is willing or able to make. The present work, presenting as it does both an attempt at critical evaluation of previous investigations and an original study of laterality characteristics in a group of normal children, will it is hoped satisfy a need for a comprehensive report on the subject. The practical problems confronting teachers and parents dealing with left-handed children have been kept in the forefront through­ out, in the hope that the information contained herein may make some contribution towards a better understanding of left-handedness and may even lead to a more tolerant attitude towards the * sinister minority*, to which the author herself belongs.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Early Deafness and Early Exposure to Sign Language on the Cerebral Organization for Motion Processing
    The Journal of Neuroscience, November 15, 2001, 21(22):8931–8942 Impact of Early Deafness and Early Exposure to Sign Language on the Cerebral Organization for Motion Processing Daphne Bavelier,1 Craig Brozinsky,1 Andrea Tomann,1 Teresa Mitchell,2 Helen Neville,2 and Guoying Liu3 1Brain and Cognitive Sciences Department, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627-0268, 2Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403-1227, and 3Georgetown Institute for Cognitive and Computational Sciences, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007 This functional magnetic resonance imaging study investigated leads to a greater reliance on the left MT–MST. Second, the impact of early auditory deprivation and/or use of a visuo- whereas the two hearing populations displayed more MT–MST spatial language [American sign language (ASL)] on the orga- activation under central than peripheral attention, the opposite nization of neural systems important in visual motion process- pattern was observed in deaf signers, indicating enhanced ing by comparing hearing controls with deaf and hearing native recruitment of MT–MST during peripheral attention after early signers. Participants monitored moving flowfields under differ- deafness. Third, deaf signers, but neither of the hearing popu- ent conditions of spatial and featural attention. Recruitment of lations, displayed increased activation of the posterior parietal the motion-selective area MT–MST in hearing controls was cortex, supporting the view that parietal functions are modified observed to be greater when attention was directed centrally after early auditory deprivation. Finally, only in deaf signers did and when the task was to detect motion features, confirming attention to motion result in enhanced recruitment of the pos- previous reports that the motion network is selectively modu- terior superior temporal sulcus, establishing for the first time in lated by different aspects of attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Learning American Sign Language on Co-Speech Gesture
    Effects of Learning American Sign Language on Co-speech Gesture Shannon Casey Karen Emmorey Laboratory for Language and Cognitive Neuroscience San Diego State University Anecdotally, people report gesturing more after learning ASL • If true, this would indicate an unusual effect of the non-dominant L2 language (ASL) on the dominant L1 language (English) – Gesture creation interacts on-line with speech production processes (e.g., McNeill, 2005) • For spoken languages, cross-language interference rarely occurs from the L2 to the L1 Overview • Study 1: Survey of signed vs. spoken language learners after one year of instruction • Study 2: Longitudinal study of signed vs. spoken language learners before and after one year of instruction Study 1: Survey • Students surveyed after two semesters of a foreign language at San Diego State University: – ASL, N = 102 – French, N = 72 – Italian, N = 47 – Spanish, N = 119 (total spoken learners = 238) Survey Questions 1. After learning French/Italian/Spanish/ASL, do you think you gesture while talking (in English): less more the same 2. Do you feel that gestures you make while talking have changed since learning French/Italian/ Spanish/ASL? yes no 3. If yes, please explain how you think your gestures have changed. Most ASL learners felt their gesture frequency increased after 1 year Perceived Gesture Frequency 100 90 80 70 60 Increase 50 Decrease Same 40 30 Percent of Respondents 20 10 0 ASL (N = 101) French (N = 71) Italian (N = 47) Spanish (N = 119) ASL learners, unlike spoken language learners,
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence from Intrinsic Activity That Asymmetry of the Human Brain Is Controlled by Multiple Factors
    Evidence from intrinsic activity that asymmetry of the human brain is controlled by multiple factors Hesheng Liua, Steven M. Stufflebeama,b, Jorge Sepulcrea,c,d, Trey Heddena,c, and Randy L. Bucknera,c,d,e,1 aAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA 02129; bHarvard-Massachusetts Institute of Technology Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139; cHarvard University Department of Psychology, Center for Brain Science, Cambridge, MA 02138; dHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Cambridge, MA 02138; and eDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA 02129 Edited by Marcus E. Raichle, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, and approved October 12, 2009 (received for review July 18, 2009) Cerebral lateralization is a fundamental property of the human Here we show strong evidence that multiple factors associate brain and a marker of successful development. Here we provide with asymmetry of distinct brain systems and provide a method evidence that multiple mechanisms control asymmetry for distinct to measure the degree of lateralization of each of these factors brain systems. Using intrinsic activity to measure asymmetry in 300 in individual subjects. We first developed an approach to quan- adults, we mapped the most strongly lateralized brain regions. tify functional laterality based on intrinsic activity fluctuations Both men and women showed strong asymmetries with a signif- using fMRI (23, 24). Factor analysis was then performed to icant, but small, group difference. Factor analysis on the asymmet- explore whether all lateralized brain systems arise from a ric regions revealed 4 separate factors that each accounted for common factor or through multiple, distinct factors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brain's Asymmetric Frequency Tuning
    S S symmetry Opinion The Brain’s Asymmetric Frequency Tuning: Asymmetric Behavior Originates from Asymmetric Perception Arianna Felisatti 1,*, David Aagten-Murphy 1,2, Jochen Laubrock 1,3, Samuel Shaki 4 and Martin H. Fischer 1 1 Department of Psychology, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Strasse 24-25 House 14, D-14476 Potsdam OT Golm, Germany; [email protected] (D.A.-M.); [email protected] (J.L.); [email protected] (M.H.F.) 2 Neuraltrain GmbH, Friedrichstr. 68, 10117 Berlin, Germany 3 Department of Psychology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane Fehrbelliner Straße 38, 16816 Neuruppin, Germany 4 Department of Behavioral Sciences and Psychology, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-331-977-2895 Received: 11 September 2020; Accepted: 10 December 2020; Published: 15 December 2020 Abstract: To construct a coherent multi-modal percept, vertebrate brains extract low-level features (such as spatial and temporal frequencies) from incoming sensory signals. However, because frequency processing is lateralized with the right hemisphere favouring low frequencies while the left favours higher frequencies, this introduces asymmetries between the hemispheres. Here, we describe how this lateralization shapes the development of several cognitive domains, ranging from visuo-spatial and numerical cognition to language, social cognition, and even aesthetic appreciation, and leads to the emergence of asymmetries in behaviour. We discuss
    [Show full text]
  • Which Side Are YOU On? Explore How Brain Dominance Affects Your Physical Abilities
    Which Side Are YOU On? Explore how brain dominance affects your physical abilities. You probably know whether you’re right- or left-handed, but have you ever thought about whether you’re right- or left-footed? How could you find out? Try these experiments to see what you can discover! HERE’S WHAT YOU’LL NEED: • Access to a mirror • Pencil and paper • Access to a gym or • Stopwatch, timer or clock with a second hand basketball court • Tape • Kickball or soccer ball • Meter stick or tape measure • Basketball • Footstool We’ll begin by conducting some simple tests to learn more about brain dominance. Start by considering your hand dominance: WARMUPS • Which hand do you use to write? • Which hand do you primarily use to drink? • Which hand do you use to brush your teeth? Is the answer to all of these questions the same hand, or do you use different hands for different primary actions? Make a table where you can start recording your findings. Next, try these activities to help determine your foot dominance: • Kick a ball three or four times in a row without thinking about it too much. Which foot did you primarily use to kick the ball? • Step up onto a footstool three or four times in a row. Did you make the first step up onto the stool with one foot more often than the other? Record your findings in your table. Do your results indicate that you have a dominant foot? Is it the same as your dominant hand? Lastly, test your eye dominance: • Wink at yourself in the mirror a few times.
    [Show full text]
  • Asplenia and Polysplenia Syndromes with Abnormalities of Lateralisation in a Sibship
    J Med Genet: first published as 10.1136/jmg.18.4.301 on 1 August 1981. Downloaded from Journal of Medical Genetics, 1981, 18, 301-302 Asplenia and polysplenia syndromes with abnormalities of lateralisation in a sibship J ZLOTOGORA AND E ELIAN From the Department ofPediatrics, Hasharon Hospital, Petah-Tiqva, and Tel-Aviv University Medical School, Israel SUMMARY In the family presented here the first child had asplenia syndrome with cor biloculare' transposition of the great vessels, pulmonary stenosis, and anomalous pulmonary venous drainage' Another sib had situs inversus with polysplenia syndrome, including very similar cardiovascular defects and biliary atresia. The possibility that these two syndromes, namely asplenia and poly- splenia, are different manifestations of a similar defect in the normal asymmetrical development of internal organs is discussed. Some degree of lateral asymmetry is one of the age and weighed 2060 g. At the age of 5 days she was characteristics of the internal human body con- noted to be cyanotic and a grade 3/6 systolic murmur figuration. A mirror image of the asymmetrical was heard along the left sternal border. At cardiac organs is found in situs inversus, while in the asplenia catheterisation, transposition of the great vessels with and polysplenia syndromes there is a striking ten- double outlet of the right ventricle and pulmonary dency for internal symmetry. In the asplenia stenosis were demonstrated. The child failed to copyright. (Ivemark) syndrome the tendency is for the left lung, thrive and died at 3 months of age following an atrium, and left lobe of the liver to resemble the episode of septicaemia.
    [Show full text]