Report on the Situation of the Press in Moldova in 2010

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Report on the Situation of the Press in Moldova in 2010 Report on the Situation of the Press in Moldova in 2010 This report includes a brief description of all the important events that characterized the situation of the press in Moldova in 2010. Also, the report includes one section dedicated to the situation of the press in the Transnistrian region. Independent Journalism Center Contents1: I. Developments and trends in the Moldovan press in 2010 • Press freedom in Moldova according to international reports • Political context • Media in electoral campaigns • Media market II. Public broadcasting sector • Broadcasting Coordinating Council • Public broadcaster Teleradio-Moldova • Regional public broadcaster Teleradio-Găgăuzia • Teleradio Bălţi III. Freedom of expression and defamation in 2010 • Legislative developments • Defamation cases against media • Violations of journalists’ rights IV. Press freedom in Transnistria V. Conclusions and predictions for 2011 1 The report is available in Romanian, English and Russian. It was prepared by Doina Costin, Coordinator of the Department for Media Policy and Law of the Independent Journalism Center, with the financial support of Civil Rights Defenders, Sweden. The opinions expressed in this report are those of the Independent Journalism Center and do not necessarily represent those of the sponsors. 2 Independent Journalism Center “Mass media has the task of informing the public about issues of public interest and of performing, in accordance with its responsibilities, journalistic investigations on issues of public interest.” (Article 4 paragraph 2 of the Law on Freedom of Expression no. 64/2010) I. Developments and trends in the Moldovan press in 2010 Press freedom in Moldova according to international reports According to the report “Press Freedom Index 2010” published by Reporters sans Frontières (RsF) in October 2010, the Republic of Moldova has climbed 39 positions since last year’s press freedom ranking. In 2010, Moldova ranked 75th with a score of 19.13 compared with the rank of 114th and a score of 33.75 in 2009. This year Moldova ranked only two positions behind Greece and four positions behind Bulgaria. Romania was 22 positions higher than Moldova. The first five positions in the ranking of world press freedom according to the RsF report were held by Finland, Iceland, Holland, Norway and Sweden. Turkmenistan (176), North Korea (177) and Eritrea (178) were the countries with the worst scores regarding the situation of the press. In 2009, both the RsF report and the report published by Freedom House noted a decline in press freedom and in democracy in Moldova, but in 2010 press freedom indicators improved visibly, a trend that was registered in all reports measuring press freedom in Moldova. This trend is primarily due to the diversification of media sources, to encouragement of media competition, to the adoption of laws favorable to the freedom of expression and to the decrease in cases of aggression registered against media professionals. Political context The political situation in the country in 2010 was absolutely different from what it had been for the previous decade. The changes in the political arena that began in late 2009 continued to surprise and sometimes invigorate society in 2010; however, it was all somewhat precarious because of the imminence of new early parliamentary elections. In the course of the year, Moldova experienced the initiation of several reforms. It is true that not all of these beginnings had tangible effects or were received with enthusiasm by all social groups. In 2009 after Parliament failed to elect the President of the Republic of Moldova, the country was governed for almost a year and a half by an interim president. The year 2010 saw several attempts to solve the problem of failing to elect the president and of avoiding new parliamentary elections. Initially an attempt was made to change the procedure for electing the country’s president. There were two initiatives: one from the ruling Alliance for European Integration (AEI) and the second from the opposition—the Party of Communists—(PCRM). Neither of these initiatives for modifying the Constitution was supported by a sufficient number of votes. As a result, on September 5, 2010 the Republic of Moldova experienced the first constitutional referendum in its history aimed at directly involving voters in changing Article 78 of the Constitution of Moldova so that the president of the country could be elected by a direct vote of the citizens, thus ending the political crisis that affected the country. The referendum, however, failed owing to insufficient participation in voting, and the dissolution of Parliament became inevitable. 3 Independent Journalism Center New early parliamentary elections took place on November 28, 2010. The parties forming the AEI chose to participate in the electoral campaign separately. While at the beginning of the campaign citizens had the impression that former components of the AEI maintained solidarity and a common strategy, with the intensification of competition, the messages of some parties became visibly oriented against former partners. That caused difficulty for voters who in many cases would have voted for the AEI rather than for a separate component of the Alliance. The race for early parliamentary elections was joined by 20 political parties and by the same number of independent candidates. The Election Code was amended in 2010, and the threshold for parties to enter Parliament was lowered from 6% to 4%. Also, the amended Code included permission for electoral blocks, excluded the interdiction against candidates with dual citizenship in Parliament and amended provisions regarding coverage of the electoral campaign by mass media in order to increase freedom and to facilitate coverage among others. Due to these changes and to the interest of authorities in encouraging competition and participation in voting, the campaign for early parliamentary elections of November 28, 2010 was different from previous ones. Civil society and the electoral authorities launched and promoted educational campaigns in the press, broadcast media organized interactive electoral debates and competitors used novel campaigning approaches. The results of the November elections were not a lot different than those of the early parliamentary elections of July 29, 2009. Apart from minor dissimilarities, the outcome was again the inability to form a parliamentary majority able to elect the country’s president. After the elections of November 28, four parties were represented in Parliament: PCRM with 39.34% of the votes and 42 seats, the Liberal Democratic Party (LDPM) with 29.42% of the votes and 32 seats, the Democratic Party (DPM) with 12.70% of the votes and 15 seats and the Liberal Party (LP) with 9.96% of the votes and 12 seats. The other 35 candidates and parties together garnered 8.58% of the votes which were distributed among the four winners equally. The rate of participation in voting was 63.37%.2 The most spectacular leap in elections was made by LDPM which gathered about 13% more votes than in July 2009 thus obtaining 14 additional seats in the 19th Parliament. This party’s rating increased during the last year and a half when its leader held the position of Prime Minister. During his mandate in government, Vald Filat ranked at the top of politicians most trusted by citizens3 with 18.2% of respondents’ preferences. Our Moldova Alliance (OMA), on the contrary, did not manage to pass the threshold for representation gathering only 2.05% of the votes and was the only one of the four parties in the original AEI formed after the elections of July 2009 that was left out of Parliament in November 2010 and thus out of AEI-2. Currently, AEI-2 holds 59 seats; 61 votes are necessary to elect a president. In the first months of 2011, Parliament must elect a president in not more than two attempts. If it fails to do so, the ensuing political crisis will jeopardize any democratic efforts of the Executive Branch. The year 2011 will also witness local elections in Moldova, including in Chişinău 2 http://www.e-democracy.md/elections/parliamentary/2010/results/ 3 Barometrul Opiniei Publice (BOP), noiembrie 2010, http://ipp.md/libview.php?l=ro&idc=156&id=558&parent=0 4 Independent Journalism Center Municipality which has been governed for the past four years by Mayor Dorin Chistoaca, Vice- President of LP. Mass media in electoral campaigns In June 2010, the Moldovan Parliament adopted a number of modifications to the Electoral Code. Several articles referring to media involvement in electoral campaigns were amended, and some new provisions were introduced. In general, these amendments were deliberated with civil society, political parties, mass media and experts in the field. Civil society suggested several amendments, 80% of which were included in the draft law on the modification of the Code. Among others, they included the following: (i) provisions regarding electoral advertizing and coverage of the electoral campaign by mass media were split; (ii) a new article was included that contains the principles for media activity during electoral campaigns; (iii) guarantees were included both for electoral competitors and their access to media and for editorial independence and transparency among broadcasters and (iv) the responsibilities of the Broadcasting Coordinating Council (BCC) were separated from those of the Central Electoral Commission (CEC). Some of these modifications to the Electoral Code, however, contradict certain provisions of the
Recommended publications
  • Brosura Eng.Pdf
    Circulation: 100 copies Print: Bons Offices SRL Design: Conviot SRL Credit for images: Mold-Street.com, ANRE.md, Adevarul.ro, Macos.livejournal.com, CFM.md, Diez.md, Europalibera.org, Protv.md, Gettyimages.com, Railways.md, Moldovagaz.md, Report.md, Customs.gov.md, Facebook.com/partidulshor, Moldgres.com, Despre-toate-si-despre-nimic.blogspot.md Credit for graphics: Business News Service SRL, National Bank of Moldova, National Statistical Bureau Promoting Government Accountability in Moldova A project supported by the National Endowment for Democracy and implemented by Business News Service /Mold-Street.com during 1 May 2017 - 31 May 2018 The version in English 1 Project coordinator: Eugeniu Rîbca All rights reserved Mold-Street.com © 2 Instead of Pay Raise, Government Prepares Pay Optimization in Public Area Public sector employees – especially in the education area – continue to nourish hopes for a perceptible pay raise. This expectation however is unlikely this year, because the salary bill for teachers and lecturers is al- ready too expensive, the Government says. Earlier protests with education employees forced the Govern- ment to pass a number of decisions regarding the remuneration improvements. One of decisions envisages a salary increase for education staff in public institutions and for other employees based on the Common Tar- iff Network. Pay raise promises Starting May 1, 2017, the public education staff in Moldova will receive a monthly raise of 100 lei (5$) and from September they will get a 10% raise, the Labor and Social Protection Ministry announced. At the same time, current legislation and the 2016 economic performance would allow to raise teachers’ salaries by 5.3% while the Government would be looking for additional funding during the amendment of the 2017 budget.
    [Show full text]
  • Curierul Economic Nr. 1-2, 2015
    ZIAR PENTRU ECONOMIŞTII DE TOATE VÂRSTELE Curierul NNR.R. 11-2-2 ((258-259)258-259) 20 februarie 2015 Fondat în 1999 EconomicPUBLICAŢIE A ACADEMIEI DE STUDII ECONOMICE DIN MOLDOVA ŞI A ASOCIAŢIEI ECONOMIŞTILOR CÂT CARACTER, ATÂTA ŢARĂ CCitiitiţi înîn ediediţiie:e: PAG. 2 Experienţe, mobilitate AVEM GUVERN academică PAG. 5 Iată cum arată componența noului Guvern: Prim-ministru – Chiril Gaburici; Recreaţii literare Viceprim-ministru, ministru al Economiei – Stephane Bride (moldovean de origine franceză) Viceprim-ministru, ministru al Afacerilor Externe şi Integrării Eu- ropene – Natalia Gherman Viceprim-ministru – Victor Osipov Ministrul Finanţelor – Anatol Arapu Ministrul Justiţiei – Vladimir Grosu Ministrul Afacerilor Interne – Oleg Balan Ministrul Apărării – Viorel Cibotaru Ministrul Agriculturii şi Industriei Alimentare – Ion Sula Ministrul Transporturilor şi Infrastructurii Drumurilor – Vasile Botnari PAG. 6 Ministrul Mediului – Sergiu Palihovici Valeriu Canţer la ceas Ministrul Educaţiei – Maia Sandu aniversar Ministrul Culturii – Monica Babuc Ministrul Muncii, Protecţiei Sociale şi Familiei – Ruxanda Glavan PAG. Chiril Gaburici, fost director la Moldcell, este Ministrul Sănătăţii – Mircea Buga 7 noul Prim-ministru al Republicii Moldova. Ministrul Dezvoltării Regionale şi Construcţiilor – Vasile Bâtcă CNC Carpe Diem Ministrul Tehnologiei Informaţiei şi Comunicaţiilor – Pavel Filip Parlamentul a dat vot de încredere noului Cabinet de miniștri. Ministrul Tineretului şi Sportului – Serghei Afanasenco. Tot miercuri, membrii Guvernului au depus jurământul în prezența Pentru guvernul Gaburici au votat deputații PLDM, șefului statului, Nicolae Timofti. Conform Constituției, noul Executiv PD și PCRM, în total 60 de voturi. Alianța de guvernare este funcțional din ziua învestirii. rămâne a fi una minoritară. ProfTop SURPRIZĂ PENTRU STUDENŢI AASEMSEM a ddecisecis să rrenunenunţe llaa eexamenelexamenele ddee llicenicenţţăă, ddarar şi llaa ccarnetelearnetele ddee nnoteote PAG.
    [Show full text]
  • Cu Privire La Activitatea Consiliului Coordonator Al Audiovizualului Din Republica Moldova În Anul 2017
    Examinat și aprobat în ședința publică a CCA din 26 ianuarie 2018 prin Decizia nr. 3/11 Președinte CCA Dragoș VICOL RAPORT cu privire la activitatea Consiliului Coordonator al Audiovizualului din Republica Moldova în anul 2017 CHIȘINĂU, 2018 RAPORT PRIVIND ACTIVITATEA CCA ÎN ANUL 2017 CUPRINS I. ROLUL ȘI MISIUNEA CCA 3 II. COMPONENȚA CONSILIULUI ÎN ANUL 2017 5 III. ANUL 2017: MOMENTE DE REFERINȚĂ 6 IV. DINAMICA DEZVOLTĂRII PIEȚEI AUDIOVIZUALE 19 4.1. Piața audiovizuală în cifre și diagrame 19 4.2. Activitatea de licențiere 25 4.3. Activitatea de autorizare a distribuitorilor de servicii de programe 36 4.4. Problema licențierii în UTA Găgăuzia 41 4.5. Activitatea audiovizuală pe teritoriul regiunii transnistrene 42 4.6. Tranziția la televiziunea digitală terestră 46 4.7. Transparența proprietății mass-media 47 4.8. Politici de susținere a radiodifuzorilor în producerea programelor autohtone 48 4.9. Implementarea Strategiei de acoperire a teritoriului național cu servicii 51 de programe audiovizuale pentru anii 2016-2018 V. PROTECȚIA CONSUMATORILOR DE PROGRAME 57 5.1. Protecția copiilor 60 5.2. Respectarea moralității și demnității umane 68 5.3. Asigurarea echilibrului și pluralismului politico-social 80 5.4. Reflectarea campaniei electorale la referendumul local din 19 noiembrie 2017 85 5.5. Protejarea patrimoniului lingvistic și cultural-național 91 5.6. Asigurarea egalității de șanse și a accesului la serviciile de programe a 97 persoanelor cu nevoi speciale 5.7. Respectarea condițiilor de plasare a publicității 100 5.8. Respectarea Concepției generale a serviciului de programe 104 5.9. Neprezentarea informației solicitate de CCA 104 5.10.
    [Show full text]
  • Lista Posturilor De Radio Și TV Care Și-Au Manifestat Intenția Desfăurarii Campaniei Electorale În Audiovizual Pentru Alegerile Parlamentare
    Lista posturilor de Radio și TV care și-au manifestat intenția desfăurarii campaniei electorale în audiovizual pentru alegerile parlamentare Crt. Denumire Post Localitate Licenta Nr. Zonă de difuzare ALBA 1. RADIO BLAJ Blaj R 264 Locală 2. RADIO STAR Sebeș R 995 Locală 3. RADIO DELTA Ocna Mures R 333 Locală 4. HIT FM ALBA Sebeș R 234 Regională (AB) 5. RADIO ENERGY 87,9 MHz Cugir R 280 Locală 6. ALBA CAROLINA TV Alba-Iulia TV-C 813 Locală 7. UNIREA FM Alba-Iulia R 871 Locală 8. RADIO EVENIMENT Aiud R 319 Locală 9. ATLAS Alba Iulia R 440 Locală ARAD 10. NATIONAL FM Arad R 841 Retea Nationala 11. TELEVIZIUNEA ARAD Arad TV-C 781 Locală 12. RADIO ARAD Arad R040 Locală ARGEȘ 13. SUPER TV / SUPER TV HD Câmpulung TV-C 833 Regională (AG, SB, BV, DB, VL, TR, OT) 14. MUSCEL TV Câmpulung TV-C 061 Regională(AG, DB, OT) 15. MUSCEL FM Câmpulung R 975 Locală 16. ARGEȘ TV Pitești TV-C 369 Locală 17. CLAR TV-MUSCEL Câmpulung TV-C 653 Locală 18. CURIER TV Pitești TV-C 590 Regională (AG) 19. ANTENA 3 Pitești TV-C 770 Regională (AG, DB, OT, VL) 20. PROFI 24 TV Curtea de Arges Locală BACĂU 21. MESAGERUL FM Bacău R1077 Locală 22. PLUS TV BACAU Bacău TV-C 849 Locală BIHOR 23. PLUSZ FM Oradea R484 Locală 24. PLUSZ FM Marghita R729 Locală BISTRIȚA-NĂSĂUD 25. AS-TV Bistrița TV-C 657 Locală 26. RADIO BALADA Bistrița R 232 Locală 27. BALADA TV Bistrița TV-C 790 Locală 28.
    [Show full text]
  • Promoting Government Accountability in Moldova
    Promoting Government Accountability in Moldova A project supported by the National Endowment for Democracy and implemented by Business News Service /Mold-Street.com during 1 May 2017 - 31 May 2018 The version in English 1 Project coordinator: Eugeniu Rîbca All rights reserved Mold-Street.com © 2 Instead of Pay Raise, Government Prepares Pay Optimization in Public Area Public sector employees – especially in the education area – continue to nourish hopes for a perceptible pay raise. This expectation however is unlikely this year, because the salary bill for teachers and lecturers is al- ready too expensive, the Government says. Earlier protests with education employees forced the Govern- ment to pass a number of decisions regarding the remuneration improvements. One of decisions envisages a salary increase for education staff in public institutions and for other employees based on the Common Tar- iff Network. Pay raise promises Starting May 1, 2017, the public education staff in Moldova will receive a monthly raise of 100 lei (5$) and from September they will get a 10% raise, the Labor and Social Protection Ministry announced. At the same time, current legislation and the 2016 economic performance would allow to raise teachers’ salaries by 5.3% while the Government would be looking for additional funding during the amendment of the 2017 budget. On the other hand, the Government admits in the Additional Memorandum on Economic and Financial Poli- cies with the IMF that it is short of resources to increases the public spending, including salaries. Salary expenses are “too large” "On the expense side the salary expenses in the public sector exceed the targets that have been established in the Memorandum with the International Monetary Fund which was signed on October 24, 2016," the execu- tive said in a press release.
    [Show full text]
  • From Confidence Building to Conflict Settlement in Moldova?
    In: IFSH (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 2011, Baden-Baden 2012, pp. 137-150. Claus Neukirch From Confidence Building to Conflict Settlement in Moldova? On 5 November 2009, on the night before the first informal 5+2 meeting1 fol- lowing the replacement of the Communist government by the centre-right coalition “Alliance for European Integration” (AEI) in Chişinău, the Head of the OSCE Mission to Moldova facilitated a private meeting between the new Moldovan chief negotiator and his Transdniestrian counterpart in a Viennese restaurant. This meeting marked the beginning of a new phase in the Trans- dniestrian settlement process and the restart of genuine talks between the two sides after a period of six years. While, for the past two years, these talks have focused on confidence-building measures and the resolution of practical issues between the sides, they have established common ground that has en- abled them to move on to official negotiations. This article looks into the prospects of moving from basic confidence building to genuine conflict settlement by analysing the enabling factors and stumbling blocks that are present today. A Look Back By November 2003, the Transdniestrian settlement process had turned from near-resolution into prolonged deadlock after a last-minute decision by Moldova’s then President Vladimir Voronin not to sign the “Kozak Memo- randum”. This proposal was brokered by Dmitry Kozak, deputy head of the Russian presidential administration, whose involvement Voronin himself had requested.2 Since then, all attempts to restart formal negotiations on the future status of Transdniestria have failed. Some progress was made in September 2005 when the sides agreed, during consultations in Odessa, to invite the European Union (EU) and the United States (US) to participate as observers in the five-sided negotiations and to restart formal talks.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Moldova
    Assessing the State of European Integration and Potential for Transatlantic Cooperation in the Post-Soviet Space: The Case of Moldova Iulian Groza, Mathias Jopp, Iurie Leancă, Julian Rusu, Hans-Martin Sieg Research Paper No 02/17 This study was prepared as part of the Project “German-American Dialogue on the Post-Soviet Space: Assessing the State of European Integration and Potential for Transatlantic Cooperation – the Case of Moldova” supported by the Transatlantik-Programm of the Federal Republic of Germany, funded by the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi) through means of the European Recovery Program (ERP). The views expressed in the Study are the views of the authors alone. IEP Research Paper No 02/17 About the author Iulian Groza is Executive Director of the the Institute for European Policies and Reforms (IPRE), Chișinau Mathias Jopp is Director of the Institut für Europäische Politik (IEP), Berlin Iurie Leancă is Former Prime-minister of the Republic of Moldova and Member of Parliament of the Republic of Moldova, Chișinau Iulian Rusu is Associate Expert on European integration policies at the Institute for European Policies and Reforms (IPRE), Chișinau Hans-Martin Sieg is Associate Fellow at the German Council on Foreign Relations (DGAP), Berlin. About the project The project: “German-American Dialogue on the Post-Soviet Space: Assessing the State of European Integration and Potential for Transatlantic Cooperation – the Case of Moldova” seeks to foster a transatlantic dialogue on the post-Soviet space and is implemented in co-operation with the German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF). The project aims at reviewing policies and instruments of Germany, in the framework of the European Neighbourhood Policy and the Eastern Partnership and those of the U.S., both with respect to their capacity to support transformation processes in the post-Soviet space.
    [Show full text]
  • The Phenomenon of Media Convergence in the Republic of Moldova: Conditions of Affirmation and Forms of Manifestation
    MEANS OF JOURNALISTIC INVESTIGATION THE PHENOMENON OF MEDIA CONVERGENCE IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: CONDITIONS OF AFFIRMATION AND FORMS OF MANIFESTATION Maria GUGULAN1 1Lecturer, State University of Moldova, Republic of Moldova Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract convergent journalism from a historical prospect, The media convergence is a phenomenon that has which is the purpose of this paper, has doubtless recently occurred in the local media. The first step toward topicality and importance, as it scientifically convergence – the development of online environment – highlights the processes that take place in this field was made in ‘2000, when the information technologies entered the circuit and the Internet extended on the media and its trends of development. market. The first forms of convergence have occurred only in 2010, when the press holdings Jurnal Trust Media and 2. EVOLUTION OF CONVERGENT General Media Grup SRL were launched. Although we may already speak about a certain level of media convergence JOURNALISM IN THE REPUBLIC OF in the local massmedia, the various collaborations between MOLDOVA press institutions aim mainly at the personal interests of their owners of financiers, who, usually, come from the political or business field and have the purpose to manipulate or to get Unlike the Western countries, where the certain benefits. From this prospect, the phenomenon of phenomenon of media convergence occurred in convergence identifies itself with another nationally and the ‘90s, in the Republic of Moldova this internationally well-known phenomenon – the concentration of media property, limiting the pluralism of opinions and weakening phenomenon happened later, in ‘2000, when the the quality of the journalistic content.
    [Show full text]
  • Moldoscopie 2016
    ASOCIAŢIA MOLDOVENEASCĂ DE ŞTIINŢĂ POLITICĂ UNIVERSITATEA DE STAT DIN MOLDOVA UNIVERSITATEA DE STUDII POLITICE ŞI ECONOMICE EUROPENE “CONSTANTIN STERE” CATEGORIA “C” MOLDOSCOPIE (PROBLEME DE ANALIZĂ POLITICĂ) Nr.4 (LXXV), 2016 REVISTĂ ŞTIINŢIFICĂ TRIMESTRIALĂ CHIŞINĂU – 2016 2 MOLDOSCOPIE, 2016, nr.4 (LXXV) MOLDOSCOPIE (Probleme de analiză politică). – nr.4 (LXXV), 2016. - Chişinău: USM, USPEE, AMSP, 2016. – 218 p. COLEGIUL DE REDACŢIE: prof. Valeriu Moşneaga (redactor-şef); prof. Victor Saca (redactor-şef adjunct) conf. Rodica Rusu (secretar); prof. Gheorghe Avornic; prof. Vladimir Gutorov (Rusia); prof. Cristian Haerpfer (Regatul Unit); conf. Valeriu Efremov; prof. Andrey Korobkov (SUA); prof. Anatoliy Kruglaşov (Ucraina); prof. Constantin Marin; prof. Victor Moraru; prof. Joao Peixoto (Portugalia); prof. Serghey Reşetnikov (Belarus); prof. Adrian Pop (România); prof. Gheorghe Rusnac; conf. Aurel Sâmboteanu; prof. Alexander Șîrineanț (Rusia); prof. Constantin Solomon; prof. Georg Sootla (Estonia) conf. Vasile Tabară (România); prof. Valentina Teosa prof. Stefan Troebst (Germania) Ideile şi opiniile expuse în materialele prezentate aparţin autorilor şi nu reflectă neapărat punctul de vedere al colegiului de redacţie Articolele apar în redacţia autorilor, sunt recenzate versiunea electronică: http://uspee.md/ro/2013-03-18-08-28-54/2013-03-18-08-32-27.html http://usm.md/cercetare/reviste/moldoscopie/ ISSN 1812-2566 © AMSP, USM, USPEE, 2016 MOLDOSCOPIE, 2016, nr.4 (LXXV) 3 S U M A R Compartimentul PORTRETE IN MISCARE 7 Rusnac Gh. Victor Saca - profesor și cercetător fidel științei po- 7 litice universitare (la 70 de ani de la naștere) Compartimentul ISTORIA, TEORIA 19 ŞI METODOLOGIA ŞTIINŢEI POLITICE Сакович В., Концепции и теории инновационного разви- 19 Квилинкова Е. тия: политико-экономические аспекты Compartimentul GUVERNAREA POLITICĂ 32 ŞI ADMINISTRAREA PUBLICĂ Babuc M.
    [Show full text]
  • Steht Später Die Headline
    LÄNDERBERICHT Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. REPUBLIK MOLDAU SVEN-JOACHIM IRMER ANDREI AVRAM Moldauisches Parlament spricht 20. Februar 2015 neuem Kabinett Vertrauen aus www.kas.de/moldau Der neue Premierminister der Republik über keine politische Erfahrung. In den Moldau ist Chiril Gaburici. Er wurde mit moldauischen Medien wurde er als „Self- den Stimmen der Liberaldemokratischen Made“-Geschäftsmann dargestellt, der vom Partei, der Demokratischen Partei sowie einfachen Fahrer zum Geschäftsführer des der Partei der Kommunisten gewählt. Er Mobilfunkanbieters Moldcell aufgestiegen kommt aus der Wirtschaft und wurde am ist. Nach vier Jahren an der Spitze von Mol- 14. Februar für das Amt nominiert, nach- dcell verließ er 2012 das Land und hatte ei- dem die PCRM ihre Zustimmung für das ne ähnliche Position in Aserbaidschan bei neue Kabinett an die Ernennung eines po- Azercell bis Ende 2014 inne. Seine Beteili- litisch neutralen Geschäftsmannes ge- gung an zwei Unternehmen gemeinsam mit knüpft hatte. Verwandten von Vertretern der politischen Eliten (einschließlich aus dem PCRM- Vor dem Parlament bekräftigte Gaburici die Umfeld) hat in einigen moldauischen Medien Fortführung des europäischen Kurses. Ge- für Fragezeichen hinsichtlich der Verflech- gen die neue Regierung stimmten neben der tung von Politik und Wirtschaft gesorgt. pro-russischen Partei der Sozialisten und Gaburici ist Absolvent der privaten russisch- der Liberalen Partei auch der scheidende sprachigen "Slavianskiy Universitet". Premierminister Iurie Leanca und der ehe- malige Vizepremierminister für die Wieder- Regierung steht vor enormen Herausfor- vereinigung des Landes, Eugen Carpov. derungen Leanca kritisierte die neue Regierung scharf. Der 18. Februar sei ein „peinlicher Bereits am Abend des 18. Februar, unmit- Tag“ und ein Rückschritt auf dem europäi- telbar nach der Vereidigung der Regierung, schen Weg der Republik Moldau.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    Media Monitoring in the Election Campaign for the Early Parliamentary Elections of November 28, 2010 General Media Monitoring Report 28 September – 28 November 2010 This Report has been developed within the Project “Media Monitoring in the Election Campaign”, with the financial support of the United Kingdom Embassy to Chisinau, the Council of Europe and the East Europe Foundation, with the resources provided by the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA/ASDI), the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) through Eurasia Foundation. The Report has also been made possible with the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), under AED’s Moldova Civil Society Strengthening Program (MCSSP).The opinions expressed herein are the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the donors. 1. General Data 1.1 Goal of the project: to assess the way, in which mass media covers the campaign for early elections in Moldova in order to establish whether the electoral candidates have fair access to the media and whether voters are provided with sufficient information about the candidates and their electoral platforms. 1.2 Monitoring timeframe: 28 September – 28 November 2010 1.3 Criteria for selection of media outlets subject to monitoring: ownership (public/private) audience/impact language 1.4 Media outlets monitored: TV: Moldova 1, Prime TV, 2 Plus, NIT, N4, Jurnal TV, Publika TV Radio: Radio Moldova, Prime FM, Vocea Basarabiei Print Press: Moldova Suverană, Nezavisimaia Moldova, Flux, Jurnal de Chişinău, Timpul de dimineaţă, Komsomolskaia pravda v Moldove, Evenimentul Zilei, Panorama, Golos Bălţi (Bălţi), Vesti Gagauzii (Comrat), Cuvântul (Rezina), Gazeta de Sud (Cimişlia).
    [Show full text]
  • Media Sustainability Index 2010
    tajikistan bosnia & herzegovina bulgaria uzbekistan albania croatia romania azerbaijan russia kyrgyzstan turkmenistan montenegro kazakhstan serbia kosovo macedonia ukraine belarus moldova georgia armenia DEVELOPMENT MEDIA OF SUSTAINABLE SUSTAINABILITY INDEPENDENT MEDIA IN INDEX EUROPE AND EURASIA 2010 MEDIA SUSTAINABILITY INDEX 2010 The Development of Sustainable Independent Media in Europe and Eurasia MEDIA SUSTAINABILITY INDEX 2010 The Development of Sustainable Independent Media in Europe and Eurasia www.irex.org/msi Copyright © 2010 by IREX IREX 2121 K Street, NW, Suite 700 Washington, DC 20037 E-mail: [email protected] Phone: (202) 628-8188 Fax: (202) 628-8189 www.irex.org Project manager: Leon Morse Assistant editor: Dayna Kerecman Myers IREX Project and Editorial Support: Mark Whitehouse, Drusilla Menaker Copyeditors: Carolyn Feola de Rugamas, Carolyn.Ink; Kelly Kramer, WORDtoWORD Editorial Services; OmniStudio Design and layout: OmniStudio Printer: Westland Enterprises, Inc. Notice of Rights: Permission is granted to display, copy, and distribute the MSI in whole or in part, provided that: (a) the materials are used with the acknowledgement “The Media Sustainability Index (MSI) is a product of IREX with funding from USAID.”; (b) the MSI is used solely for personal, noncommercial, or informational use; and (c) no modifications of the MSI are made. Acknowledgment: This publication was made possible through support provided by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under Cooperative Agreement No. DGS-A-00-99-00015-00. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed herein are those of the panelists and other project researchers and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or IREX. ISSN 1546-0878 ii USAID USAID is an independent federal government agency that receives overall foreign policy guidance from the Secretary of State.
    [Show full text]