DOCSLIB.ORG

Promoting Government Accountability in Moldova

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Promoting Government Accountability in Moldova Promoting Government Accountability in Moldova A project supported by the National Endowment for Democracy and implemented by Business News Service /Mold-Street.com during 1 May 2017 - 31 May 2018 The version in English 1 Project coordinator: Eugeniu Rîbca All rights reserved Mold-Street.com © 2 Instead of Pay Raise, Government Prepares Pay Optimization in Public Area Public sector employees – especially in the education area – continue to nourish hopes for a perceptible pay raise. This expectation however is unlikely this year, because the salary bill for teachers and lecturers is al- ready too expensive, the Government says. Earlier protests with education employees forced the Govern- ment to pass a number of decisions regarding the remuneration improvements. One of decisions envisages a salary increase for education staff in public institutions and for other employees based on the Common Tar- iff Network. Pay raise promises Starting May 1, 2017, the public education staff in Moldova will receive a monthly raise of 100 lei (5$) and from September they will get a 10% raise, the Labor and Social Protection Ministry announced. At the same time, current legislation and the 2016 economic performance would allow to raise teachers’ salaries by 5.3% while the Government would be looking for additional funding during the amendment of the 2017 budget. On the other hand, the Government admits in the Additional Memorandum on Economic and Financial Poli- cies with the IMF that it is short of resources to increases the public spending, including salaries. Salary expenses are “too large” "On the expense side the salary expenses in the public sector exceed the targets that have been established in the Memorandum with the International Monetary Fund which was signed on October 24, 2016," the execu- tive said in a press release. The main reason is the approval of a new law on retirement pensions in Decem- ber 2016, which applied general rules on social contributions for all categories of public sector employees. "It is expected that the net impact on the public budgetary deficit will be limited, given that the increase of salary expenses in the public sector will be compensated significantly by larger revenues to the social fund," the release reads. Government: Blame the pension reform! In 2017 the spending for public sector salaries will amount to 12,461 million lei, which is 537 million lei (+4.5%) above the target of 11,924 million lei, with governmental official blaming the reform in the retire- ment pension system. "The reform […] started in order to make the retirement pension system fairer, more sustainable and more transparent. The Law on Pension System Reform which was passed in December 2016, foresees: (i) enforcement of a new calculation formula, which would ensure a stronger connection between contributions and pensions in order to improve the coverage and conformity; (ii) gradual increase of the retirement age up to 63: for men until 2019, for women until 2028; (iii) application of identical meth- ods of calculation of contributions and pensions across the entire public sector; and (iv) payment of a basic pension to reduce poverty among the elderly," the document reads. In parallel, the Government says it has begun a complex administrative reform that is due to complete in autumn 2017, just ahead the debates on the 2018 budget where the costs of this reform should be added. Optimization of salaries at the horizon This task is clearly mentioned in the IMF-Moldova agreement: Optimization of salaries and labor force in the public sector shall begin in every sector apart, and the system of motivation of employees and the mechanism for incentives shall begin too. The targets refer to the maximum salary level in the public ad- ministration; minimum social expenses in the public administration; and the top ceiling for the government’s internal arrears. Premier Pavel Filip blames the previous governments for the state of the remuneration system – without naming one. „For years, in a populist and non-transparent way, governments of Moldova changed parts of the system for certain categories of beneficiaries, and thus they undermined the integrity and viability of the remuneration system. For these reasons, I have requested the crafting of a new remuneration system concept 3 in the public sector. We need a unitary system, fair and strong,” the prime minister said at a meeting with a reform taskforce. Rank or performance? The draft concept of Mr. Filip’s reform has been prepared and will follow the principle “equal pay for equal labor” – which means the salary will be linked to the rank of the job. The draft calls for reducing the com- plexity of the remuneration system by increasing the pay size for the job ranking compared with the total salary; this is designed to make the public jobs more attractive for young specialists. Performance is another principle in the new concept; it will be applied in the case of most categories of em- ployees where remuneration will encourage the so-called flat growth and development based on perform- ance and experience. The document also provides for a growing degree of uniformity, clear rules, fairness, transparency and protection of the unitary nature against eventual interferences, according to the premier. © * * * The Battle for Moldovagaz: 20 Companies Reorganized into Three Entities The plan to restructure the Russian-Moldovan joint venture Moldovagaz in compliance with “European Di- rectives” is set to win approval at the annual meeting of shareholders on 26 May 2017, sources in the Moldovan Government say. It is the Third Energy Package of the European Union and new national laws on natural gases that entail Moldova to break up the domestic gas monopolist. The company is owned by Rus- sia via Gazprom (50%), Moldova (35.33%), separatist Transnistria 13.44%, with small shareholders ac- counting for 1.3%. Three to stay out of 20 The group is currently represented by 20 smaller, regional firms, and after reorganization only three entities will remain on the Moldovan gas market. The first one, Moldovagaz S.A., shall continue to import natural gases from the Russian Federation and shall assume a debt of more than 700 million dollars towards Gaz- prom. The other, Moldovatransgaz S.A., will handle the transportation and transit operations. The fate of a subsidiary that manages the butane and propane filling stations is yet unclear. Chișinău-Gaz S.R.L. will clue the remaining 12 limited liabilities that deal with the distribution and delivery of gases to consumers. Chișinău-Gaz will become the most important and largest gas business in Moldova. Last march it welcomed a new chief, Ruslan Garbali, a Socialist member of the Gagauzian regional legislature who had run the pledge management department at the Moldovan Savings Bank (BEM). The bank was closed in 2016 over its role in a billion-dollar financial fraud two years earlier. Mr. Garbali will manage a company with a turnover of five billion lei. Whether Moldovagaz chairman Va- sile Botnari, a former minister on behalf of the ruling Democratic Party, will keep his job is unclear for the time being. "It is not a simple reorganization – we are running a whole restructuring of the group of compa- nies that are part of Moldovagaz," Deputy Prime Minister / Economy Minister Octavian Calmic promised in an interview published by Deschide.md. "We shall create distinct enterprises for the transportation, distribu- tion, and supply of natural gases. We don’t have such a structure at present. There is now a mother com- pany, and a number of regional daughter firms and our plan is to implement a reorganization based on other principles,” Mr. Calmic stated. The deputy premier pointed to the European Union’s Third Energy Package and a number of Moldovan laws which the Chisinau Parliament passed in 2016 and take effect in 2017-18. In October 2011 Moldova had committed itself to enforce the Third Energy Package until January 2015 and then negotiated a deferment until 2020. The E.U. Directives oblige the signatory countries to break up mo- nopolies into separate operations and to ensure equal access to the transportation, distribution, and storage of natural gases. Distribution will be thus taken over by an entity acting independently from the producing cor- poration – Russia’s gas giant Gazprom. The latter, which is controlled by the Russian government, has 4 claimed that the Third Energy Package was designed namely against Russia. Gazprom empire in Moldova Gazprom currently controls the entire journey of natural gases from the Siberian probes to the homes of Moldovan consumers, either directly or via Moldovagaz. According to the investigative portal RISE- Moldova, directly and indirectly Moldovagaz officially controls 19 gas distribution firms (100%), transpor- tation company Moldovatransgaz, and gas servicing enterprises Flacara Albastră in Chișinău and IALG in Strășeni. Moldovatransgaz in turn is a parent company of Transautogaz, and Bălți-Gaz, a subsidiary, owns Bălți-Gaz-Montaj and Realexpres-Gaz in Sângerei. Moldovagaz also appears as a founder of the distribution enterprises in the secessionist region of Transnis- tria. In its annual reports for 2008-2009 it admitted that 25% of Tiraspoltransgaz is its property; the latter in turn has six enterprises in its property. Gazprom currently manages the assets in Transnistria and is expected to take over all of them in exchange for the region’s huge debts. Moldovan Deputy Premier Octavian Calmic said all low- and medium-pressure tubes which Moldovagaz has been using for years would be transmitted into the permanent ownership of this or other company that appears as a result of reorganization. According to Moldovagaz records, it currently owns just 34.3% of the distribution network while the remaining 65.7% of networks don’t appear in any property acts.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Report 1, Ijc, May 1-14, 2015
    Media Monitoring during the Campaign for Local General Elections on 14 June 2015 Report no.1 1–14 May 2015 This report has been produced by the Independent Journalism Center with support of the East Europe Foundation from resources provided by the Government of Sweden through the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida) and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark/DANIDA. The opinions herein are those of authors and may not reflect the opinions of the East Europe Foundation, the Government of Sweden, Sida or the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark/DANIDA. 1. General information 1.1 Project goal: To monitoring and to provide information to the public about mass media behavior during the election campaign, including candidates’ access to mass media and pluralism of opinions presented. The monitoring aims to analyze reporting trends that might affect mass media performance and compromise their ability to provide correct, unbiased, and pluralistic information to the public. 1.2 Monitoring period: 1 May–14 June 2015 1.3 Criteria for selecting media outlets to monitor: • Audience-impact: national, quasi-national • Type of mass media: broadcasting, online • Ownership: public, private • Language: Romanian, Russian 1.4 List of mass media outlets monitored: Broadcasting media Moldova 1 “Mesager (Messenger)” newscast at 21:00: public television station, national coverage, broadcasts in Romanian and Russian Prime TV “Primele Ştiri (First news)” newscast at 21:00: private television station, national coverage, broadcasts in Romanian and Russian Canal 2 “Reporter” newscast at 19:00: private television station, national coverage, broadcasts in Romanian TV 7 “Ştiri (News)” newscast at 20:30: private television station, regional coverage, broadcasts in Romanian and Russian Accent TV “Accent info” newscast at 20:00: private television station, broadcasts in Romanian and Russian.
    [Show full text]
  • Moldova: from Oligarchic Pluralism to Plahotniuc's Hegemony
    Centre for Eastern Studies NUMBER 208 | 07.04.2016 www.osw.waw.pl Moldova: from oligarchic pluralism to Plahotniuc’s hegemony Kamil Całus Moldova’s political system took shape due to the six-year rule of the Alliance for European Integration coalition but it has undergone a major transformation over the past six months. Resorting to skilful political manoeuvring and capitalising on his control over the Moldovan judiciary system, Vlad Plahotniuc, one of the leaders of the nominally pro-European Democra- tic Party and the richest person in the country, was able to bring about the arrest of his main political competitor, the former prime minister Vlad Filat, in October 2015. Then he pushed through the nomination of his trusted aide, Pavel Filip, for prime minister. In effect, Plahot- niuc has concentrated political and business influence in his own hands on a scale unseen so far in Moldova’s history since 1991. All this indicates that he already not only controls the judi- ciary, the anti-corruption institutions, the Constitutional Court and the economic structures, but has also subordinated the greater part of parliament and is rapidly tightening his grip on the section of the state apparatus which until recently was influenced by Filat. Plahotniuc, whose power and position depends directly on his control of the state apparatus and financial flows in Moldova, is not interested in a structural transformation of the country or in implementing any thorough reforms; this includes the Association Agreement with the EU. This means that as his significance grows, the symbolic actions so far taken with the aim of a structural transformation of the country will become even more superficial.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Finance Benchmarking Toolkit: Piloting and Lessons Learned
    fdaşlığ тво East нерс рт Strengthening Institutional Frameworks ідне па tenariat Orientalteneriatul Esti for Local Governance 2015-2017 Par ar ğı P artnership P Pa fdaşlıq во Eastern r T eneriatul Estic Східне пар Local Finance tnership enariat Oriedaşl art r f q t ten fda ar r Par r Benchmarking ıq тво Easter rq t fdaşlıq P fdaşlıq r нерс во Eastern P r T рт т T нерс рт Toolkit: Східне хідне па eneriatul Estic Ş па a art eneriatultnership Estic Ş P teneriatul Estic Східне ar at Oriental Східне паOrientala r P artnership P daşlığı P enariat O artnership tenariat Ofd piloting and stern f art P ar r r q t во Eastern P r q t ст Eastern daşlıq P r fdaşlığı P во Ea r f r т T lessons learned q t тво Ea r нерс Estic iatul Estichip Ş Схід eneriatu t artnership atul Estic Ş нерс l Estic Ş eriatul Estic Par tener daşlığ Східне парт ar r f rtnership P tenariat Oriental тво Eastern P rq t ip ar с eneri ер во Східне парт t не т MOLDOVA ar daşlığı P нерс P r f eneriatul Estic Ş tners Східне парт art tenariat Oriental ar P en P LOCAL FINANCE BENCHMARKING TOOLKIT: PILOTING AND LESSONS LEARNED Східне парт t Par tnership Par Par ENG tnership tenariat Oriental n tn ar ar rtenariat OrientalP ar Eastern f P Pa во r l q Eastern ğ ern The Council of Europe is the continent’s leading human rights The European Union is a unique economic and political partnership http://eap-pcf-eu.coe.int organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Studia Politica 1 2016
    www.ssoar.info Republic of Moldova: the year 2015 in politics Goșu, Armand Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Goșu, A. (2016). Republic of Moldova: the year 2015 in politics. Studia Politica: Romanian Political Science Review, 16(1), 21-51. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-51666-3 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-NC-ND Lizenz This document is made available under a CC BY-NC-ND Licence (Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell-Keine Bearbeitung) zur (Attribution-Non Comercial-NoDerivatives). For more Information Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.de Republic of Moldova The Year 2015 in Politics ARMAND GO ȘU Nothing will be the same from now on. 2015 is not only a lost, failed year, it is a loop in which Moldova is stuck without hope. It is the year of the “theft of the century”, the defrauding of three banks, the Savings Bank, Unibank, and the Social Bank, a theft totaling one billion dollars, under the benevolent gaze of the National Bank, the Ministry of Finance, the General Prosecutor's Office, the National Anti-Corruption Council, and the Security and Intelligence Service (SIS). 2015 was the year when controversial oligarch Vlad Plakhotniuk became Moldova's international brand, identified by more and more chancelleries as a source of evil 1. But 2015 is also the year of budding hope that civil society is awakening, that the political scene is evolving not only for the worse, but for the better too, that in the public square untarnished personalities would appear, new and charismatic figures around which one could build an alternative to the present political parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Cc-Cult-Bu(2001)2A E] Cc-Cult-Bu(2001)2A
    Strasbourg, 17 September 2001 [PF: CC-Cult/1erBureau/documents/CC-CULT-BU(2001)2A_E] CC-CULT-BU(2001)2A COUNCIL FOR CULTURAL CO-OPERATION CULTURE COMMITTEE Meeting of the Bureau Chisinau, 4 (9.30 a.m.) – 5 (5.00 p.m.) October 2001 (Palais de la République Bâtiment B, 2e étage Str. Nicolai lorga, 21) EUROPEAN PROGRAMME OF NATIONAL CULTURAL POLICY REVIEWS CULTURAL POLICY IN MOLDOVA REPORT OF A EUROPEAN PANEL OF EXAMINERS Item 8 of Draft Agenda Distribution: - Members of the Bureau of the Culture Committee Documents are available for consultation on the Internet page of the cultural co- operation: http://culture.coe.int, username and password: decstest. CC-CULT-BU (2001) 2A 1 DRAFT DECISION The Bureau of the CC-Cult : - took note of the experts’ report on the Cultural Policy in Moldova (CC-Cult – BU (2001)2A) and congratulated its authors for its quality; - thanked the Moldovan authorities for their invitation to hold the first meeting of the CC-Cult Bureau in Chisinau on the occasion of the national debate on the cultural policy in Moldova; - is pleased that the MOSAIC II project will contribute to the implementation of the recommendations contained in this report. 2 CC-CULT-BU (2001) 2A Membership of the Panel of Examiners Ms France Lebon, Chairperson (Belgium) Directrice, Direction Générale de la Culture, Ministère de la Communauté Francaise - Belgium Ms Maria Berza, (Romania) Formerly State Secretary for Culture – Romania, President Romanian Centre for Cultural Policy and Projects (CERC), vice-President for Romania, Pro Patrimonio Foundation
    [Show full text]
  • 1 DEZBATERI PARLAMENTARE Parlamentul Republicii Moldova De
    DEZBATERI PARLAMENTARE Parlamentul Republicii Moldova de legislatura a XIX-a SESIUNEA a VII-a ORDINARĂ – SEPTEMBRIE 2013 Ședința din ziua de 26 septembrie 2013 (STENOGRAMA) SUMAR 1. Declararea deschiderii sesiunii de toamnă și a ședinței plenare. Intonarea Imnului de Stat al Republicii Moldova. (Intonarea Imnului de Stat al Republicii Moldova și onorarea Drapelului de Stat al Republicii Moldova.) 2. Luare de cuvînt din partea Fracțiunii parlamentare a Partidului Comuniștilor din Republica Moldova – domnul Vladimir Voronin. 3. Luare de cuvînt din partea Fracțiunii parlamentare a Partidului Liberal Democrat din Moldova – domnul Valeriu Streleț. 4. Luare de cuvînt din partea Fracțiunii parlamentare a Partidului Democrat din Moldova – domnul Dumitru Diacov. 5. Luare de cuvînt din partea Fracțiunii parlamentare a Partidului Liberal – domnul Ion Hadârcă. 6. Dezbateri asupra ordinii de zi și aprobarea ei. 7. Dezbaterea, aprobarea în primă lectură și adoptarea în lectura a doua a proiectului de Lege nr.341 din 15 iulie 2013 pentru ratificarea Convenției Consiliului Europei privind accesul la documentele oficiale. 8. Dezbaterea, aprobarea în primă lectură și adoptarea în lectura a doua a proiectului de Lege nr.343 din 26 iulie 2013 pentru ratificarea Acordului cu privire la colaborarea în domeniul pregătirii specialiștilor subdiviziunilor antiteroriste în instituțiile de învățămînt ale organelor competente ale statelor membre ale Comunității Statelor Independente. 9. Dezbaterea și aprobarea în primă lectură a proiectului Codului transporturilor rutiere. Proiectul nr.267 din 14 iunie 2013. 10. Dezbaterea proiectului de Lege nr.352 din 2 septembrie 2013 cu privire la locuințe. În urma dezbaterilor, s-a luat decizia de a transfera proiectul pînă la pregătirea raportului comisiei.
    [Show full text]
  • OSW COMMENTARY NUMBER 168 1 European Integration (AIE)
    Centre for Eastern Studies NUMBER 168 | 22.04.2015 www.osw.waw.pl An appropriated state? Moldova’s uncertain prospects for modernisation Kamil Całus There have been several significant changes on Moldova’s domestic political scene in the wake of the November 2014 parliamentary elections there. Negotiations lasted nearly two months and re- sulted in the formation of a minority coalition composed of two groupings: the Liberal-Democratic Party (PLDM) and the Democratic Party (PDM). New coalition received unofficial support from the Communist Party (PCRM), which had previously been considered an opposition party. Contrary to their initial announcements, PDLM and PDM did not admit the Liberal Party led by Mihai Ghim- pu to power. Moreover, they blocked the nomination for prime minister of the incumbent, Iurie Leancă. Leancă has been perceived by many as an honest politician and a guarantor of reforms. This situation resulted in the political model present in Moldova since 2009 being preserved. In this model the state’s institutions are subordinated to two main oligarch politicians: Vlad Filat (the leader of PLDM) and Vlad Plahotniuc (a billionaire who de facto controls PDM). With control over the state in the hands of Filat and Plahotniuc questions are raised regarding the prospects of Moldova’s real modernisation. It will also have a negative impact on the process of implementation of Moldova’s Association Agreement with the EU and on other key reforms concerning, for example, the judiciary, the financial sector and the process of de-politicisation of the state’s institutions. From both leaders’ perspective, any changes to the current state of affairs would be tantamount to limiting their influence in politics and the economy, which would in turn challenge their business activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Report 3, Promo-Lex, September 14
    REPORT No 3 Observation Mission for the Presidential Election in the Republic of Moldova on 30 October 2016 Monitoring period: 14 September –4 October 2016 Published on 5 October 2016 Chisinau 2016 RAPORTUL nr. 3 de observare a alegerilor pentru funct ia de Pres edinte al Republicii Moldova All rights reserved. The content of the Report may be used and reproduced for not-for-profit purposes and without the preliminary consent of Promo-LEX Association, provided that the source of infor- mation is indicated. The Observation Mission for the Presidential Election in the Republic of Moldova on 30 October 2016 is funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), British Embassy in Chis- inau, National Endowment for Democracy, Council of Europe. The opinions presented in the public reports of Promo-LEX belong to their authors and do not neces- sarily reflect the donors’ view. REPORT No 3 on the observation of the presidential election in the Republic of Moldova TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………………...………………….....………2 OBSERVATION METHODOLOGY………………….………………………………….…………................................2 SUMMARY…………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………...3 I. LEGAL FRAMEWORK ………………………………………………………………………............................4 II. ELECTORAL BODIES……………………………………………………..…………………….…...….............7 III. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION………………………………………………………………......................…11 IV. ELECTION CANDIDATES…………………………………………………………………...………....…….15 V. FUNDING OF THE ELECTION CAMPAIGN FOR THE PRESIDENT OF THE
    [Show full text]
  • Coe/EU Eastern Partnership Programmatic
    CoE/EU Eastern Partnership Programmatic Co-operation Framework (PCF) 2015-2017 Project on “Strengthening the efficiency, professionalism and accountability of the judiciary in the Republic of Moldova” Launching of the court coaching programme on implementation of CEPEJ tools in the pilot courts of the Republic of Moldova LIST OF PARTICIPANTS Date: 04 September 2015, 10:00 – 17:00 Venue: Complexul turistic “Vatra”, or. Vadul-lui-Vodă, Parcul Nistrean Name, Surname, Title 1. Mr Jose-Luis Herrero, Head of Council of Europe in Chisinau 2. Mr Leonid Antohi, Project Coordinator, Council of Europe 3. Mr Ivan Crnčec, CEPEJ member (Croatia) 4. Mr Frans Van Der Doelen, CEPEJ member (The Netherlands) 5. Mr Fotis Karayannopoulos, Lawyer, CEPEJ expert (Greece) 6. Mr Jaša Vrabec, National Correspondent to the CEPEJ (Slovenia) 7. Mr Ruslan Grebencea, Senior Project Officer, Council of Europe in Chisinau 8. Mr Dumitru Visterniceanu, Superior Council of Magistracy 9. Mrs Palanciuc Victoria, Administration of courts Division, Ministry of Justice 10. Mrs Vitu Natalia, Head of judicial statistics service within the Department of Justice Administration, Ministry of Justice 11. Ms Lilia Grimalschi, Head of Department of analysis and enforcement of ECtHR Judgments, Ministry of Justice 12. Mr Oleg Melniciuc, President of Riscani District Court 13. Mrs Zinaida Dumitrasco, Head of the Secretariat, Riscani District Court, mun. Chisinau 14. Mrs Mocan Natalia, Head of generalization and systematization of judicial practice Service, Riscani District Court 15. Ms Eugenia Parfeni, Head of Department for systematization, generalization of judicial practice and PR, Riscani District Court 16. Mr Dvurecenschii Evghenii, judge, Cahul Court of Appeal 17. Mrs Hantea Svetlana, Head of Secretariat, Cahul Court of Appeal 18.
    [Show full text]
  • “Public Policy Challenges – European and Regional Dimensions” Written Revised Versions of Seminar Proceedings 9 Eminar 201 Summer S
    XX Summer Seminar for Young Public Policy Professionals from Southeastern Europe and the Black Sea Region “Public Policy Challenges – European and Regional Dimensions” Written revised versions of seminar proceedings 9 eminar 201 Summer S The XX Summer Seminar is organised by the Economic Policy Institute with the kind support of the: Summer Seminar for Young Public Policy Professionals from Southeastern Europe and the Black Sea Region Public Policy Challenges – European and Regional Dimensions Written revised versions of the presentations delivered at the XX Edition of the Summer Seminar for Young Public Policy Professionals from Southeastern Europe and the Black Sea Region, held in the period June 3 – 7, 2019 in Albena resort (Bulgaria) Sofia 2019 © 2019 Economic Policy Institute TABLE OF CONTENTS 1463 Sofia, 126 Vitosha Boulevard, fl. 6, unit 11 Responsible: Mariana Trifonova LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS ............................................................................................................. 5 Design & prepress: ID TEAM Ltd. Print: Simolini 94 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS ................................................................................................................ 6 PREFACE © All the materials in this publication may not be reproduced, transmitted or Yasen Georgiev, Economic Policy Institute .......................................................................11 disseminated in any form, without the permission of the authors. The content of this volume does not fully cover the list of topics on the Semi- nar’s
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Ri~ for Human Development
    INTERNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP 10 RI~ FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT 26F Plaza Street, N E , Leesburg, Virgnia 20176, U S A. WINTER HEAT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM MOLDOVA USAID AGREEMENT NO. 121-A-00-99-00707-00 FINAL REPORT June 30, 1999 Tel (703) 443-2078, Fax. (703) 443-2012, E-mad mhd@erols corn TABLE OF CONTENTS Page # Report of Fuel Dellveries 1. Institutions which recelve fuel A. Hospitals ..... ....... 1 B. Boarding Schools & Orphanages .... ...... 2 C. Boarding Schools for Dlsabled .... ...... 3 D. Secondary Schools .......................... 3 E. Nurseries . ............................ .... 21 F. Pensloners & Vulnerable Famllles ...... 21 G. Other ................................. .. 40 H, Total Delivered ....................... 40 I. Summary of Dellverles by Categories ...... 41 J. Coverage Agalnst Heatmg Requlrements .... 41 Repalrs to Heatlng Systems ........... 42 Monitoring .......... ....... 43 Problems & How Problems were Addressed ........... 45 Outstanding Issues .......... 46 Cooperation wlth GOM .......... 46 Unforessen Matters ....... 47 Descrlbe any Matters/Problems Concerning Fuel Deliveries/Fuel Companies ....... 47 Number of Outstanding Fuel Companies Vouchers to be Paid ...... ....... 47 Other Comments ........... ...... 48 ATTACHMENT 1 Fuel Deliveries to Instltutlons ATTACHMENT 2: Coal Dellverles by Dlstrlct GR/AS Coal & Heatlng 011 for Instltutlons ATTACHMENT 3: Coal Dellverles by Dlstrlct - AS Coal for Households ATTACHMENT 4: Beneflclarles ATTACHMENT 5: Fuel Purchases ATTACHMENT 6: Coal Dellverles by Month ATTACHMENT 7. Payments
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Report for 2009
    Contract number: 2009/219-955 Project Title: Building confidence between Chisinau and Tiraspol Report starting date: 01 January 2010 Report end date: 31 December 2011 Implementing agency: UNDP Moldova Country: Republic of Moldova Support to Confidence Building Measures II – Final Report 2010-2011 – submitted by UNDP Moldova 1 Table of Contents I. SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................................. 3 II. CONTEXT ................................................................................................................................................................. 4 III. PROJECT BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................. 5 1. BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................................................................................ 5 2. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................................................................................ 6 3. CIVIL SOCIETY DEVELOPMENT ...................................................................................................................................... 7 4. SUPPORT TO CREATION OF DNIESTER EUROREGION AND RESTORATION OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC. ........................................... 7 IV. SUMMARY OF IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]