Freehold Development Opportunity Land to the Rear of 59 Bellegrove

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Freehold Development Opportunity Land to the Rear of 59 Bellegrove Land to the rear of 59 Bellegrove Road, Welling, Kent DA16 3PB Description Freehold development The existing site is a collection of vacant garages.The site itself is set in the centre of Welling just behind opportunity Bellegrove Road and within a 7 minute walk to Welling Station. Planning permission has now been granted for the demolition of the existing site and the erection — Site with planning consent for the demolition of 3x3 bedroom houses with associated parking and of the existing garages and erection of 3 x amenity space and amenity space. 3-bedroom dwellinghouses as per the schedule — Private garden space to the ground floor along Location with sun terraces at second floor level Welling is an area of south-east London, it is located within the London Borough of Bexley and the historic — 2 parking spaces per house county of Kent. The site is set in the centre of Welling — 7 minute walk to Welling Station Just behind Bellegrove Road, which has all high Street amenities and is only a 7 minute walk from Welling — A 26 minute direct train link to Station. There are many primary and secondary schools London Bridge Station located within the Welling area; Bexley Grammar School, — Located to the rear of 59 Bellegrove Road Danson Primary School and Welling School. The High Street provides all of the necessary local amenities — Freehold including supermarkets, boutique shops, restaurants, — Offers in excess of £400,000 bars and pubs. +44 (0)1992 660204 highfield-investments.co.uk Land to the rear of 59 Bellegrove Road, Welling, Kent DA16 3PB PRE-APPLICATION ADVICE PRE-APPLICATION ADVICE On 15th May 2018 a pre-application meeting was held with planning officer OnGareth 15th May Clegg 2018. Thisa pre-application was a very meetinguseful discussion was held with which planning was officer favourable to the Garethprinciple Clegg of. residentialThis was a verydevelopment useful discussion but required which was significant favourable changes to the to the Proposed development principledesign of. Theresidential conclusion development is copied but requiredbelow, fromsignificant the letterchanges dated to the 11th July design2018. The Reference: conclusion 18/00917/PREAPP is copied below, from the letter dated 11th July 2018. Reference: 18/00917/PREAPP solar cells The main660204 design issue was the quality of internal and external spaces in solar cells The main design issue was the quality of internal and external spaces in termsterms of sunlight,of sunlight, daylight daylight, outlook, outlook and privacy and .privacy The planning. The planningofficer officer sun terracesun terrace suggestedsuggested that that this thiswas wasan area an wherearea wherethe building the building could be could higher .be We higher . We discussed how1992 this could allow a smaller ground-floor plan, increasing the discussed) how this could allow a smaller ground-floor plan, increasing the garden area0 , and create a living rooms with sun terrace at 2nd floor level - garden area( , and create a living rooms with sun terrace at 2nd floor level - 17m 17m seesee sketch sketch copied copied below below from thefrom architect's the architect's meeting meeting notes. notes. no loss of daylightno loss of daylight 25˚ to neighbours +44 25˚ to neighbours windows no This left further work to be done on orientation and privacy; making sure that no windows no This left further work to be done on orientation and privacy; making sure that Restricted 25˚ visibility the rooms don't look at the walls of other buildings. We will discuss below and access Restricted 25˚ visibility the rooms don't look at the walls of other buildings. We will discuss below and access how this was achieved, and how it determines the appearance of the buildinghow this. was achieved, and how it determines the appearance of the Restricted building. visibility and access Restricted The resulted in a joggle-jointed plan, seen adjacent. Each of the three visibility and access housesThe resulted is different in ina detailjoggle-jointed, but has the plan same, seen accommodation adjacent. Each. of the three SIDE ELEVATION PROPOSED Datum: 48.00m. houses is different in detail, but has the same accommodation. Elevation 2. SIDE ELEVATION PROPOSED We were advised which specialist reports are required, and these have Datum: 48.00m. informed and shaped the design as well. Elevation 2. We were advised which specialist reports are required, and these have informed and shaped the design as well. Conclusion rwp1 svp2 Whilst the principle of residential redevelopment of this under utilised backland site is acceptable,Conclusion given the constrained nature of the site, the key consideration will be rwp1 svp2 ensuring a satisfactory standard of accommodation for future occupiers and ensuring rwp1 noWhilst unacceptable the principle impact ofon residential the amenity redevelopment of neighbouring properties. of this under As discussed utilised backland in site is BED 1 theacceptable, meeting, I do given not consider the constrained that the submitted nature ofplan thes wouldsite, theafford key a suitableconsideration will be svp1 standardensuring of accommodationa satisfactory standardfor future occupiers,of accommodation in terms of outlook,for future the occupiers overbearing and ensuring svp2 rwp1 relationshipno unacceptable of the apartment impact blockon the at amenityTurnpike ofClose, neighbouring and the associated properties. As discussed in BED 1 overshadowingthe meeting, and I do loss not of consider light to the that windows the submitted in the rear plan elevationss would of affordthe a suitable svp1 proposedstandard houses of accommodation and their garden for areas. future There occupiers, may be design in terms solutions of outlook, to address the overbearing svp2 this, but this is likely to involve a more comprehensive review of the overall design. It willrelationship also be important of the to apartment ensure that block the issues at Turnpike raised by Close, the Highway and the Authorit associatedy are overshadowing and loss of light to the windows in the rear elevations of the svp1 satisfactorily addressed within a Transport Statement, and your appointed transport consultantproposed should houses liaise and with their the identifiedgarden areas.contact There to agree may the bescope design of this solutions to address LIVING rwp5 assessmentthis, but this in advance is likely of to its involve preparation. a more comprehensive review of the overall design. It will also be important to ensure that the issues raised by the Highway Authority are Given the need for more substantive design revisions, I would recommend that you svp1 satisfactorily addressed within a Transport Statement, and your appointed transport seekconsultant further pre should-application liaise advice with the once identified a revised contact scheme to has agree been theworked scope up, of this ahead of the formal submission of an application. LIVING rwp5 assessment in advance of its preparation. ss1 rwp6 rwp6 List of Documentation to be submitted with application BED 2 BED 3 Given the need for more substantive design revisions, I would recommend that you KITCHEN DINING seekCompleted further application pre-application form advice once a revised scheme has been worked up, rwp5 aheadSigned of Ownership the formal and submission Agricultural of Holdings an application. Certificate ss1 Application fee rwp5. rwp6 rwp6 t.b ListLocation of Documentation plan to be submitted with application BED 2 BED 3 SUN TERRACE Site / block plan KITCHEN DINING FloorCompleted plans application form Roof plans rwp5 Signed Ownership and Agricultural Holdings Certificate Sections and site levels Application fee rwp5. .b Elevations t Location plan Design andhighfield-investments.co.uk access / planning statement Site / block plan GROUND FLOOR PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PROPOSED SECONDSUN FLOOR TERRACE PROPOSED Transport statement PhaseFloor 1 plansland c ontamin ation assessment REVISED SECTION SKETCH MADE DURING MEETING ArchaeologicalRoof plans desk based assessment DrainageSections strategy and site levels 59 Bellegrove Road, Welling DA16 3PB Job no. 1640 DaylightElevationsDesign and sunlight & Access report Statement February 2018 © Chassay Studio Ltd 2018 www.chassaystudio.com This preDesign-application and a adviceccess follows/ planning an initial statement officer assessment of the information GROUND FLOOR PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PROPOSED you haveTransport provided. statement Every formal application is subject to a statutory assessment Proposed schedule process Phase and it1 is land only cthenontamin that aation full assessment assessment of all the material planning REVISED SECTION SKETCH MADE DURING MEETING considerations Archaeological can be madedesk inbased the context assessment of relevant development plan policies. Some Drainage important considerationsstrategy may only arise or become apparent during this formal process, which includes consultation with residents and other third parties Daylight and sunlight report Unit Type Floors59 Bellegrove Road, Welling DA16 3PB GIAJob (sq no m). 1640 GIA (sq ft) affected by theDesign development. & Access This officer Statement advice is therefore February given for 2018your general © Chassay Studio Ltd 2018 www.chassaystudio.com guidance in the preparation of a future planning application or proposal. The advice This pre-application advice follows an initial officer assessment of the information 1 House Ground, First, Second 94 1,012 you have
Recommended publications
  • Tram Potential
    THE INTERNATIONAL LIGHT RAIL MAGAZINE www.lrta.org www.tautonline.com JULY 2019 NO. 979 GROWING LONDON’S TRAM POTENTIAL Brussels congress debates urban rail safety and sustainability Doha launches Metro Red line service US raises Chinese security concerns India plans ‘Metrolite’ for smaller cities Canberra Energy efficiency £4.60 Realising a 100-year Reduced waste and light rail ambition greater profitability 2019 ENTRIES OPEN NOW! SUPPORTED BY ColTram www.lightrailawards.com CONTENTS 244 The official journal of the Light Rail Transit Association 263 JULY 2019 Vol. 82 No. 979 www.tautonline.com EDITORIAL EDITOR – Simon Johnston [email protected] ASSOCIATE EDITOr – Tony Streeter [email protected] WORLDWIDE EDITOR – Michael Taplin [email protected] 256 NewS EDITOr – John Symons [email protected] SenIOR CONTRIBUTOR – Neil Pulling WORLDWIDE CONTRIBUTORS Tony Bailey, Richard Felski, Ed Havens, Andrew Moglestue, Paul Nicholson, Herbert Pence, Mike Russell, Nikolai Semyonov, Alain Senut, Vic Simons, Witold Urbanowicz, Bill Vigrass, Francis Wagner, Thomas Wagner, Philip Webb, Rick Wilson PRODUCTION – Lanna Blyth Tel: +44 (0)1733 367604 [email protected] NEWS 244 saving energy, saVING COST 258 Doha opens Metro Red line; US politicians Len Vossman explains some of the current DESIGN – Debbie Nolan raise Chinese security concerns; Brussels initiatives driving tramway and metro ADVertiSING celebrates ‘tramway 150’; Arizona’s Valley energy efficiency. COMMERCIAL ManageR – Geoff Butler Tel: +44 (0)1733 367610 Metro extends to Gilbert Rd; Bombardier [email protected] UK to build new Cairo monorail; Luas-style SYSTEMS FACTFILE: london trams 263 PUBLISheR – Matt Johnston system proposed for Ireland’s Cork; Neil Pulling looks at developments on the Kent-Essex tramway is feasible; India UK network formerly known as Tramlink.
    [Show full text]
  • Mouseprice.Com's Most Affordable Street Rankings
    MOUSEPRICE.COM’S MOST AFFORDABLE STREET RANKINGS 2010 CONTENTS National Report .................................................................................................................................................................... 3 How have these streets been identified? ......................................................................................................................... 4 Average price value of the top 10 streets in each region ............................................................................................. 4 The East ................................................................................................................................................................................ 5 East Midlands ........................................................................................................................................................................ 6 Greater London ..................................................................................................................................................................... 7 THe North East ...................................................................................................................................................................... 8 The North West .................................................................................................................................................................... 9 The South East ...................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Locally Listed Buildings and Structures in the London Borough of Bexley, of Architectural Or Historic Interest
    www.bexley.gov.uk Locally Listed Buildings Locally listed buildings and structures in the London Borough of Bexley, of architectural or historic interest These are shown in street order for ease of reference Locally listed buildings and structures in street order Year of Address Locality Name or descriptive detail entry A 1-12 (cons) Acacia Way Sidcup Former Hollies Children’s Home Boys 2011 Houses: ‘Limes’ and ‘Oaks’ 32 & 33 Acacia Way Sidcup Former Hollies Children’s Home Infant 2011 Boys Home: ‘Willow’ 34 Acacia Way Sidcup Sports Club building 2011 35 & 36 Acacia Way Sidcup Former ‘Hollies’ admin. building. Other 1983 The Manor House flats addressed to Rowanwood Avenue. 38, 39 & 40 Acacia Way Sidcup Stable block of “The Hollies” 2006 53 Acacia Way Sidcup Former Hollies Children’s Home building 2011 - Ash’ 54-73 (cons) Acacia Way Sidcup Former Hollies Children’s Home Boys 2011 Homes: ‘Beeches’ and Firs’ 63 Albert Road Bexley “The Black Horse” 1983 1 & 2 Belvoir Cottages Alma Road Sidcup 2006 10 Alma Road Sidcup “The Alma” 1983 2 Avenue Road Bexleyheath “Turret House” 2006 6 Avenue Road Bexleyheath “Torre” 2006 27 Avenue Road Bexleyheath “Ravensbourne” 2006 109 Avenue Road Erith Lodge 2008 B Chapel Banks Lane Bexleyheath Cemetery Chapel 2006 War memorial Banks Lane Bexleyheath War memorial in cemetery 2006 Maufe memorial Banks Lane Bexleyheath Memorial in cemetery 2011 The Red Barn Barnehurst Road Bexleyheath The Red Barn Public House 2008 3, 5 & 7 Bedford Road Sidcup “Burley Villas” 2006 6 Bedwell Road Belvedere Kearsbrook Lodge 2008
    [Show full text]
  • Bexley Labour Group Submission 2
    Bexley Labour Group submission 2 (B) Overview of proposed arrangements This submission has sought to deliver electoral equality throughout the pattern, forming wards around a principle of -/+5% from the variance. Nineteen of the twenty-three wards achieve this principle; fourteen proposed wards are within 4%, nine are within 3%, five are within 2% and three are within 1% of the average electoral quotient. Four wards are above the self-imposed - /+5% quotient and where that is the case it has been justified in the description of the proposed wards. The Local Government Boundary Commission for England has indicated that it is minded to recommend that the council size be forty-five and this proposal reflects that. Bexley is a residential suburban borough and many of the towns and neighbourhoods have been built around railway stations and they remain and provide a hub with shops and amenities. Where appropriate and where railway lines can be easily traversed the proposed arrangements reflect that. The submission considers the A2 which runs east-west across the centre of the borough to be an obstacle and no proposed wards cross it. The ward description sets out the defined borders of the proposed wards and deals with the three principles of i) electoral equality, ii) community identity and iii) effective and convenient local government. (C) Description of wards 1. Thamesmead East The proposed ward is defined to the north by the River Thames, to the east by Norman Road (beyond the Crossness engines and nature reserve), to the south by the North Kent railway line and to the west by the border with the Royal Borough of Greenwich.
    [Show full text]
  • Auction 24Th February 2015
    Barnett Ross TUESDAY 24TH FEBRUARY 2015 At The Radisson Blu Portman Hotel 22 Portman Square London W1H 7BG Commencing at 12.00 p.m. Light refreshments served at 11.30 a.m. AUCTION 24TH FEBRUARY 2015 24TH FEBRUARY Auctioneers J. Barnett FRICS J. L. G. Ross MRICS Tel: 020 8492 9449 Fax: 020 8492 7373 Notice to all Bidders 1. Please note the General Conditions of Sale which are included with this catalogue and the Special Conditions of Sale which are available on request. An Addendum will be made available on the Auction Day and the bidder should check whether the lot which he/she is interested in bidding for is included. 2. Prospective purchasers are assumed to have inspected the properties in which they are interested and to have made all usual pre-contract searches and enquiries. 3. The successful Bidder is Bound under Contract as soon as the Auctioneer’s gavel falls on his/her final bid. Immediately thereafter the successful Bidder will be handed a Form to fill out supplying details of his/her name and address together with (if different) the name and address of the purchaser and those of his/her solicitors. He/she must also supply a cheque for the deposit, which we will hold at our office. The bidder will be given our bank account details and must arrange to transfer the deposit monies to our client bank account the following day by way of a ‘same day CHAPS payment.’ Once these funds are received we will return the bidder’s cheque by post.
    [Show full text]
  • Submissions to Call for Evidence from Individuals
    Submissions to call for evidence from individuals 1 Ref Individual Name RD-35 Andrew Bosi RD-36 Ann Lusmore RD-37 ‘Bruce’ Rail User RD-38 Chris Torrero RD-39 D.M. Byrne RD-40 David Dando RD-41 Fenella De Smet RD-42 Graham Larkbey RD-43 Guiliana Castle RD-44 Joe Webb RD-45 John Linwood RD-46 Jon Salmon RD-47 Joseph Barnsley RD-48 Laurel Rutledge RD-49 Laurence Mack RD-50a Lewis Cooke RD-50b Lewis Cooke RD-51 Luke Nicolaides RD-52 Cllr O Rybinkski RD-53 Matt Buck RD-54 Patricia Taylor RD-55 Phil Vasili RD-56 Peter Haggett RD-57 Phil Wass RD-58a Philip Ridley RD-58b Philip Ridley RD-58c Philip Ridley RD-59 Richard Logue RD-60a Rob Knight RD-60b Rob Knight RD-61 Robert Woolley RD-62 Simon Feldman RD-63 Steve Whitehead RD-64 Vic Heerah RD-65 Zara Stewart 2 RD - 35 Thank you for the invitation to comment. 1. What are the key problems with National Rail services in London that need to be addressed? They are less frequent than tubes and London Overground services, they end too early, there are insufficent staff members on stations. 2. What changes to the delivery, funding or governance of rail services in London should be considered? The concession arrangement granted to LOROL has transformed the services in question, proving that increasing the frequency and attractiveness of the service brings people off the roads and onto rail, or out of their homes to become economically active. 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Bury St Edmunds
    TICKETING & SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT SCHEDULE 17 - REGULATED STATIONS (24 June 2015) -------------------------------------------------------------- Train Company Page(s) ABELLIO GREATER ANGLIA ......................................................................................................................................................................... 2 ARRIVA TRAINS WALES/TRENAU ARRIVA CYMRU ...................................................................................................................................... 4 c2c ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 CHILTERN RAILWAYS .................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 EAST MIDLANDS TRAINS ............................................................................................................................................................................ 8 GREAT NORTHERN and THAMESLINK ......................................................................................................................................................... 9 FIRST GREAT WESTERN ............................................................................................................................................................................ 11 FIRST TRANSPENNINE EXPRESS ...............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The London Rail
    A B C D E F G H Towards Towards Towards Towards Towards Towards Aylesbury Hemel Hempstead Luton Stevenage Stevenage Stansted Airport Luton Airport Parkway Outside fare zones, Welwyn Garden City Hertford North Hertford East St Margarets London’s Outside fare zones Watford Junction Oyster not valid. Hatfield Bayford Harpenden Welham Green Ware Chesham 9 St Albans City Brookmans Park Cuffley Outside fare zones Rye Amersham Potters Bar House Watford High Street Radlett Hadley Wood Crews Hill Rail & Tube 6 Broxbourne Cockfosters Gordon Hill Bushey Elstree & Borehamwood New Barnet Chalfont & 8 Enfield Chase Cheshunt Epping Latimer Watford Oakwood 7 8 High Barnet Towards 5 Grange Park Theydon Bois Chelmsford services Carpenders Park Theobalds Waltham Outside Oakleigh Park Grove 6 7 8 and Southend Towards Chorleywood Southgate Cross Debden fare Croxley Totteridge & Whetstone Enfield High 7 Winchmore Hill Town zones Turkey Loughton Wycombe Rickmansworth Street Hatch End Edgware Woodside Park Arnos Grove Shenfield New Southgate Enfield Lock Moor Park Palmers Green Southbury Buckhurst Hill Stanmore Mill Hill Broadway West Finchley Bounds Bush Hill Brentwood 1 1 6 Headstone Lane Green Park Brimsdown Chingford Northwood Roding 5 West Ruislip Burnt Oak 4 Mill Hill East Valley Grange Hill Canons Park Ponders End Northwood Bowes Park Hills Harrow & Wealdstone Colindale Chigwell Finchley Central Edmonton Green Highams Hainault Hillingdon Ruislip Harold Wood Queensbury Hendon Central Alexandra Wood Green Meridian Water Park Pinner 5 Woodford Ruislip Manor
    [Show full text]
  • Travelcard Zones Map Mar 08
    Hemel Hempstead Watford Junction is outside Luton Welwyn Hertford Cheshunt Stansted Airport Watford Garden North Chesham Transport for London zonal Watford Junction area. Special fares apply. City 8 78 Radlett Potters Bar Cuffley Theobalds Grove Waltham Cross 9 Chalfont Watford High Street Aylesbury & Latimer Rickmansworth Elstree & Borehamwood Hadley Wood Crews Hill Turkey Street Enfield Lock Bushey Epping Debden Theydon Bois Amersham Chorleywood Gordon Hill Enfield Croxley Carpenders Park Loughton Enfield Town Cockfosters High Barnet New Barnet Chase Bush Hill Chingford Denham Hatch End Edgware Park Brimsdown Grange Park Moor Park Oakwood High Headstone Lane Buckhurst Hill Wycombe West Ruislip Northwood Totteridge & Oakleigh Stanmore Whetstone Park Winchmore Hill Southbury Northwood Harrow & Wealdstone Mill Hill Broadway Mill Hill East Southgate Ponders End Hills Burnt Oak Hillingdon Canons Park Woodside Park New Palmers Green Ruislip Southgate Arnos Grove Edmonton Highams Park Ruislip Green Manor Pinner Queensbury West Finchley Roding Colindale Bounds Angel Road Chigwell Uxbridge Ickenham Silver Street Valley North Harrow Kingsbury Green Eastcote Kenton Finchley Central Bowes Park Shenfield Harrow- Northwick Wembley Hendon Central White Hart Grange Ruislip on-the-Hill Park Preston Road Park Wood Green Lane Hill Gardens Hendon East Finchley Woodford Rayners Brent Cross Alexandra Palace Brentwood Lane West Harrow Neasden Bruce Grove Northumberland Wood Street Hainault Golders Green Highgate Turnpike Lane Park Dollis Hill Hornsey South
    [Show full text]
  • The Campaign to Save the London Trams 1946-1952
    The Campaign To Save the London Trams 1946-1952 Based on the Collected Papers Of The late Alan John Watkins By Ann E. Watkins THE LONDON TRAMS CAMPAIGN: 1946-1952 Table of Contents Introduction page 2 Chapter One Reasons for the Abandonment of the trams in London page 4 Chapter Two Light Railway Transport League’s reasons for retaining The London trams page 14 Chapter Three Congestion, Safety and Pollution page 21 Chapter Four Cost of Keeping and of Abandoning the trams page 24 Chapter Five Fare increases after tram scrapping page 27 Chapter Six A Question of Capacity page 31 Chapter Seven The Kingsway Subway page 35 Chapter Eight The End of the Road page 39 Chapter Nine The Effects of Tramway Abandonment page 45 Chapter Ten Campaign Satire page 48 Chapter Eleven Conclusion, The End, A New Beginning page 53 Chapter Twelve A Brief Biography of Alan John Watkins page 57 Sources Consulted page 60 Index page 61 Acknowledgements page 65 List of Illustrations London Transport Tramways map 1933 page 3 Tram 97 at Woolwich market page 9 Revamped LUT car Shepherds Bush page 15 LUT Feltham car at Uxbridge page 16 Map showing the Kingsway subway page34 Tram entering the Kingsway subway page 35 Tram in the Kingsway subway page 37 Bus above entrance to Kinsgway Subway page 38 Last Day Kingsway Subway Tram page 38 Stan Collins driving last tram 7 th April 1951 page 39 Tram 1951 at New Cross Depot page 42 Feltham tram at Penhall Road page 43 Last Tramweek in London 1952 page 44 Last Tramweek ticket page 44 Last tram in London snow broom 022 page 52 Docklands Light Railway train at Greenwich station page 53 The beginnings of Croydon Tramlink page 54 Tramlink trams outside East Croydon station page 56 Alan Watkins page 57 Alan Watkins at Cwmcarn Gwent 1989 page 59 Alan Watkins at Smallbrook Junction Isle of Wight page 59 Cover Page Car 1934 on the Embankment 1952 © Ann E.
    [Show full text]
  • London Borough of Bexley
    ELECTORAL REVIEW OF THE LONDON BOROUGH OF BEXLEY THE COUNCIL’S PROPOSALS FOR A NEW PATTERN OF ELECTORAL WARDS IN THE LONDON BOROUGH OF BEXLEY Section 1 Introduction The Council on 23 rd July 2014 resolved to seek a review of the electoral arrangements in the London Borough of Bexley on the basis of a proposal that the number of elected members of the Council should be reviewed to allow appropriate representation to best support residents. The Local Government Boundary Commission for England (“the Commission”) agreed that it would undertake a review of the London Borough of Bexley’s electoral arrangements. Initial meetings and briefings were conducted by the Commission in February 2015. The Council’s Constitution provides that General Purposes Committee is responsible for elections and electoral matters. On 14 th April that Committee agreed that a Working Group consisting of elected Members of the Council would meet to consider key issues with a view to reaching a consensus on the submissions to be made by the Council. The Working Group met on 2 nd June 2015 and 28 th July 2015 and its discussions informed the submission on Council size. The Council in its submission, with unanimous support from all political groups, proposed that the number of elected Councillors should be reduced from 63 to 45. The Commission has indicated that it is minded to recommend that 45 borough councillors should be elected to the London Borough of Bexley in future and on 8 th September opened its consultation inviting proposals for a new pattern of electoral wards to accommodate those councillors.
    [Show full text]
  • London Connections RAIL SERVICES
    K L M N P Q R S T National Rail Train Operating Companies CONTACT DETAILS FOR CHILTERN CHILTERN LONDON MIDLAND FIRST FIRST Hertford NATIONAL EXPRESS EAST ANGLIA RAILWAYS RAILWAYS SOUTHERN CAPITAL CAPITAL CONNECT London Connections Aylesbury, East St Margarets Chiltern Railways TRAIN OPERATING COMPANIES Aylesbury Milton Keynes, CONNECT Luton Bedford, Stevenage, Letchworth, Welwyn Harlow, Bishops Stortford, Banbury and See London Fare Zones panel about Northampton, Cambridge, Kings Lynn, Stevenage Hertford Stansted Airport Wellingborough, Garden City North Ware c2c Birmingham Travelcard availability in Zones 7, 8 and 9 Rugby, Coventry, Kettering, Leicester, Huntingdon, Peterborough and Cambridge RAIL SERVICES Birmingham and and the North East Rye Chiltern Railways Nottingham, Derby Hatfield Bayford House First Capital Connect the North West and Sheffield NOTES: This map is a guide to services provided by the Customer Services Chesham Watford Bricket St Albans Welham Green Cuffley Broxbourne train operators on weekdays but does not guarantee First Great Western North Wood Abbey direct trains between the stations shown; some peak Banbury ICC, Merton Street Amersham Brookmans Park Crews Hill Enfield Cheshunt London Midland HIGH WYCOMBE ST ALBANS Town Theobalds period services are omitted. Garston How Park Potters Bar Cockfosters Grove Epping Banbury OX16 4RN 1 9 Wood Street Gordon Hill A few services do not operate and some stations are not 1 London Overground (managed under contract by TfL) Beaconsfield Watford WATFORD JUNCTION Radlett Hadley Wood Theydon Bois served in the early mornings and late evenings, or at Chalfont & Latimer 6 Oakwood Enfield Chase Bush National Express East Anglia c2c Watford High Street Hill weekends and on public holidays.
    [Show full text]