Land to the rear of 59 Bellegrove Road, Welling, Kent DA16 3PB Description Freehold development The existing site is a collection of vacant garages.The site itself is set in the centre of Welling just behind opportunity Bellegrove Road and within a 7 minute walk to Welling Station. Planning permission has now been granted for the demolition of the existing site and the erection — Site with planning consent for the demolition of 3x3 bedroom houses with associated parking and of the existing garages and erection of 3 x amenity space and amenity space. 3-bedroom dwellinghouses as per the schedule — Private garden space to the ground floor along Location with sun terraces at second floor level Welling is an area of south-east London, it is located within the London Borough of Bexley and the historic — 2 parking spaces per house county of Kent. The site is set in the centre of Welling — 7 minute walk to Welling Station Just behind Bellegrove Road, which has all high Street amenities and is only a 7 minute walk from Welling — A 26 minute direct train link to Station. There are many primary and secondary schools London Bridge Station located within the Welling area; Bexley Grammar School, — Located to the rear of 59 Bellegrove Road Danson Primary School and Welling School. The High Street provides all of the necessary local amenities — Freehold including supermarkets, boutique shops, restaurants, — Offers in excess of £400,000 bars and pubs. +44 (0)1992 660204 highfield-investments.co.uk Land to the rear of 59 Bellegrove Road, Welling, Kent DA16 3PB PRE-APPLICATION ADVICE PRE-APPLICATION ADVICE On 15th May 2018 a pre-application meeting was held with planning officer OnGareth 15th May Clegg 2018. Thisa pre-application was a very meetinguseful discussion was held with which planning was officer favourable to the Garethprinciple Clegg of. residentialThis was a verydevelopment useful discussion but required which was significant favourable changes to the to the Proposed development principledesign of. Theresidential conclusion development is copied but requiredbelow, fromsignificant the letterchanges dated to the 11th July design2018. The Reference: conclusion 18/00917/PREAPP is copied below, from the letter dated 11th July 2018. Reference: 18/00917/PREAPP solar cells The main660204 design issue was the quality of internal and external spaces in solar cells The main design issue was the quality of internal and external spaces in termsterms of sunlight,of sunlight, daylight daylight, outlook, outlook and privacy and .privacy The planning. The planningofficer officer sun terracesun terrace suggestedsuggested that that this thiswas wasan area an wherearea wherethe building the building could be could higher .be We higher . We discussed how1992 this could allow a smaller ground-floor plan, increasing the discussed) how this could allow a smaller ground-floor plan, increasing the garden area0 , and create a living rooms with sun terrace at 2nd floor level - garden area( , and create a living rooms with sun terrace at 2nd floor level - 17m 17m seesee sketch sketch copied copied below below from thefrom architect's the architect's meeting meeting notes. notes. no loss of daylightno loss of daylight 25˚ to neighbours +44 25˚ to neighbours windows no This left further work to be done on orientation and privacy; making sure that no windows no This left further work to be done on orientation and privacy; making sure that Restricted 25˚ visibility the rooms don't look at the walls of other buildings. We will discuss below and access Restricted 25˚ visibility the rooms don't look at the walls of other buildings. We will discuss below and access how this was achieved, and how it determines the appearance of the buildinghow this. was achieved, and how it determines the appearance of the Restricted building. visibility and access Restricted The resulted in a joggle-jointed plan, seen adjacent. Each of the three visibility and access housesThe resulted is different in ina detailjoggle-jointed, but has the plan same, seen accommodation adjacent. Each. of the three SIDE ELEVATION PROPOSED Datum: 48.00m. houses is different in detail, but has the same accommodation. Elevation 2. SIDE ELEVATION PROPOSED We were advised which specialist reports are required, and these have Datum: 48.00m. informed and shaped the design as well. Elevation 2. We were advised which specialist reports are required, and these have informed and shaped the design as well. Conclusion rwp1 svp2 Whilst the principle of residential redevelopment of this under utilised backland site is acceptable,Conclusion given the constrained nature of the site, the key consideration will be rwp1 svp2 ensuring a satisfactory standard of accommodation for future occupiers and ensuring rwp1 noWhilst unacceptable the principle impact ofon residential the amenity redevelopment of neighbouring properties. of this under As discussed utilised backland in site is BED 1 theacceptable, meeting, I do given not consider the constrained that the submitted nature ofplan thes wouldsite, theafford key a suitableconsideration will be svp1 standardensuring of accommodationa satisfactory standardfor future occupiers,of accommodation in terms of outlook,for future the occupiers overbearing and ensuring svp2 rwp1 relationshipno unacceptable of the apartment impact blockon the at amenityTurnpike ofClose, neighbouring and the associated properties. As discussed in BED 1 overshadowingthe meeting, and I do loss not of consider light to the that windows the submitted in the rear plan elevationss would of affordthe a suitable svp1 proposedstandard houses of accommodation and their garden for areas. future There occupiers, may be design in terms solutions of outlook, to address the overbearing svp2 this, but this is likely to involve a more comprehensive review of the overall design. It willrelationship also be important of the to apartment ensure that block the issues at Turnpike raised by Close, the Highway and the Authorit associatedy are overshadowing and loss of light to the windows in the rear elevations of the svp1 satisfactorily addressed within a Transport Statement, and your appointed transport consultantproposed should houses liaise and with their the identifiedgarden areas.contact There to agree may the bescope design of this solutions to address LIVING rwp5 assessmentthis, but this in advance is likely of to its involve preparation. a more comprehensive review of the overall design. It will also be important to ensure that the issues raised by the Highway Authority are Given the need for more substantive design revisions, I would recommend that you svp1 satisfactorily addressed within a Transport Statement, and your appointed transport seekconsultant further pre should-application liaise advice with the once identified a revised contact scheme to has agree been theworked scope up, of this ahead of the formal submission of an application. LIVING rwp5 assessment in advance of its preparation. ss1 rwp6 rwp6 List of Documentation to be submitted with application BED 2 BED 3 Given the need for more substantive design revisions, I would recommend that you KITCHEN DINING seekCompleted further application pre-application form advice once a revised scheme has been worked up, rwp5 aheadSigned of Ownership the formal and submission Agricultural of Holdings an application. Certificate ss1 Application fee rwp5. rwp6 rwp6 t.b ListLocation of Documentation plan to be submitted with application BED 2 BED 3 SUN TERRACE Site / block plan KITCHEN DINING FloorCompleted plans application form Roof plans rwp5 Signed Ownership and Agricultural Holdings Certificate Sections and site levels Application fee rwp5. .b Elevations t Location plan Design andhighfield-investments.co.uk access / planning statement Site / block plan GROUND FLOOR PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PROPOSED SECONDSUN FLOOR TERRACE PROPOSED Transport statement PhaseFloor 1 plansland c ontamin ation assessment REVISED SECTION SKETCH MADE DURING MEETING ArchaeologicalRoof plans desk based assessment DrainageSections strategy and site levels 59 Bellegrove Road, Welling DA16 3PB Job no. 1640 DaylightElevationsDesign and sunlight & Access report Statement February 2018 © Chassay Studio Ltd 2018 www.chassaystudio.com This preDesign-application and a adviceccess follows/ planning an initial statement officer assessment of the information GROUND FLOOR PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PROPOSED you haveTransport provided. statement Every formal application is subject to a statutory assessment Proposed schedule process Phase and it1 is land only cthenontamin that aation full assessment assessment of all the material planning REVISED SECTION SKETCH MADE DURING MEETING considerations Archaeological can be madedesk inbased the context assessment of relevant development plan policies. Some Drainage important considerationsstrategy may only arise or become apparent during this formal process, which includes consultation with residents and other third parties Daylight and sunlight report Unit Type Floors59 Bellegrove Road, Welling DA16 3PB GIAJob (sq no m). 1640 GIA (sq ft) affected by theDesign development. & Access This officer Statement advice is therefore February given for 2018your general © Chassay Studio Ltd 2018 www.chassaystudio.com guidance in the preparation of a future planning application or proposal. The advice This pre-application advice follows an initial officer assessment of the information 1 House Ground, First, Second 94 1,012 you have