DOCSLIB.ORG

Ukraine Faa119 Biodiversity Analysis: Actions Needed for Conservation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ukraine Faa119 Biodiversity Analysis: Actions Needed for Conservation UKRAINE FAA119 BIODIVERSITY ANALYSIS: ACTIONS NEEDED FOR CONSERVATION PROSPERITY, LIVELIHOODS AND CONSERVING ECOSYSTEMS (PLACE) IQC TASK ORDER # AID-121-TO-11-00001 May 2011 This report was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by ECODIT for the Ukraine Biodiversity Analysis Task Order No. AID-121-TO-11-00001 ECODIT Contract #EPP-I-00-06-00010-00; Task Order # AID-121-TO-11-00001 AUTHORITY Prepared for USAID/Ukraine under Prosperity, Livelihoods and Conserving Ecosystems (PLACE) Indefinite Quantity Contract number EPP-I-00-06-00010-00, Task Order #AID-121- TO-11-00001 awarded March 2011 and entitled “Ukraine Biodiversity Analysis”. This “Ukraine FAA119 Biodiversity Analysis” is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents of this report are the sole responsibility of ECODIT and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government (USG). PREPARED BY The Analysis Team of the Ukraine Biodiversity Analysis. 1600 Wilson Blvd, Suite 1220 Arlington, VA 22209 USA Tel: +1 703 841 1883 Fax: +1 703 841 1885 Web: www.ecodit.com Cover photo: Nymphoides peltata, Yellow Floating-heart, Dnipro Delta. This plant was common in rivers and floodplain lakes of the Dnipro River Basin when it had a natural hydrological regime. After the many Dnipro dams were constructed and completely altered the natural flow regime, this species became rare, and is now listed in the Red Data Book of Ukraine. Photo by G. Karpova (2009) Ukraine FAA 119 Biodiversity Analysis: Actions Needed for Conservation Page | II ECODIT Contract #EPP-I-00-06-00010-00; Task Order # AID-121-TO-11-00001 [This page intentionally blank] Ukraine FAA 119 Biodiversity Analysis: Actions Needed for Conservation Page | III ECODIT Contract #EPP-I-00-06-00010-00; Task Order # AID-121-TO-11-00001 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................. IV ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ........................................................................................................... V ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................................... VII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... VIII 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 PURPOSE ............................................................................................................................................................................1 1.2 METHODS ..........................................................................................................................................................................1 2.0 STATUS OF BIODIVERSITY ........................................................................................................ 3 2.1 BIODIVERSITY INFORMATION ........................................................................................................................................3 2.2 ECOSYSTEMS ....................................................................................................................................................................4 2.3 SPECIES ........................................................................................................................................................................... 10 2.4 GENETIC DIVERSITY ..................................................................................................................................................... 11 3.0 VALUES AND ECONOMICS OF BIODIVERSITY ..................................................................... 13 3.1 PRODUCTS ...................................................................................................................................................................... 13 3.2 ECOSYSTEM SERVICES ................................................................................................................................................. 15 3.3 NON – MATERIAL BENEFITS ....................................................................................................................................... 16 4.0 THREATS TO BIODIVERSITY ................................................................................................... 18 4.1 DIRECT THREATS .......................................................................................................................................................... 18 4.2 CAUSES ........................................................................................................................................................................... 20 5.0 GOVERNMENT POLICIES, LAWS, AND INSTITUTIONS ....................................................... 24 5.1 POLICIES AND LAWS ..................................................................................................................................................... 24 5.2 INSTITUTIONS ................................................................................................................................................................ 25 5.3 PROTECTED AREAS ....................................................................................................................................................... 27 5.4 TREATIES ........................................................................................................................................................................ 31 6.0 NGO AND DONOR PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES ................................................................. 34 6.1 NGOS.............................................................................................................................................................................. 34 6.2 DONORS .......................................................................................................................................................................... 38 7.0 ACTIONS NEEDED TO CONSERVE BIODIVERSITY .............................................................. 41 7.1 ACTIONS NEEDED AS IDENTIFIED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF UKRAINE ............................................................... 41 7.2 ACTIONS NEEDED AS IDENTIFIED BY THE BIODIVERSITY ANALYSIS TEAM ....................................................... 43 7.3 COSTS OF ADDRESSING ACTIONS NEEDED .............................................................................................................. 49 ANNEX A: REFERENCES AND WEBSITES CONSULTED ................................................................. 50 ANNEX B: BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES OF THE ANALYSIS TEAM ............................................... 52 ANNEX C: STATEMENT OF WORK ..................................................................................................... 53 ANNEX D: PERSONS CONTACTED, THEIR INSTITUTIONAL AFFILIATION, AND CONTACT INFORMATION ............................................................................................................................................ 58 Ukraine FAA 119 Biodiversity Analysis: Actions Needed for Conservation Page | IV ECODIT Contract #EPP-I-00-06-00010-00; Task Order # AID-121-TO-11-00001 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS We have tried to minimize the use of abbreviations and acronyms used in this report, but we use them to save space when they refer to frequently mentioned organizations and conventions, and when commonly used in this field. The full name to which the abbreviation or acronym refers is given the first time it is used in the text. BEO Bureau Environmental Officer EE Europe and Eurasia CBD Convention on Biological Diversity CDCS Country Development Cooperation Strategy CITES Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species CMS Convention on Migratory Species CNPA Carpathian Network of Protected Areas ECNC European Centre for Nature Conservation EEZ Exclusive Economic Zone ENPI European Neighborhood and Partnership Instrument EU European Union EUNIS European University Information Systems FAA Foreign Assistance Act FLEG Forest Law Enforcement and Governance FSC Forest Stewardship Council GEF Global Environmental Facility GOU Government of Ukraine HCVF High Conservation Value Forests IBA Important Bird Area IPM Integrated Pest Management IUCN International Union for the Conservation of Nature Ukraine FAA 119 Biodiversity Analysis: Actions Needed for Conservation Page | V ECODIT Contract #EPP-I-00-06-00010-00; Task Order # AID-121-TO-11-00001 MAB Man and the Biosphere MENR Ministry of Ecology and Nature Resources NECU National Ecological Centre of Ukraine NGO Non-governmental Organization NOBANIS North European and Baltic Network on Invasive Alien Species NTFP Non-Timber Forest Product PA Protected Area PDP Parliamentary Development Project PES Payment for Ecosystem Services SAFR State Agency for Forest Resources SFC State Forestry Committee SIDA Swedish International Development Agency SOW Scope of Work USAID United States Agency for International Development USFS United States Forest Service USGS United States Geological Survey UNCCD United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification UNDP United Nations Development Program UNEP United Nations Environment Program UNESCO
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Trends of Aquatic Alien Species Invasions in Ukraine
    Aquatic Invasions (2007) Volume 2, Issue 3: 215-242 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3391/ai.2007.2.3.8 Open Access © 2007 The Author(s) Journal compilation © 2007 REABIC Research Article Trends of aquatic alien species invasions in Ukraine Boris Alexandrov1*, Alexandr Boltachev2, Taras Kharchenko3, Artiom Lyashenko3, Mikhail Son1, Piotr Tsarenko4 and Valeriy Zhukinsky3 1Odessa Branch, Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (NASU); 37, Pushkinska St, 65125 Odessa, Ukraine 2Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas NASU; 2, Nakhimova avenue, 99011 Sevastopol, Ukraine 3Institute of Hydrobiology NASU; 12, Geroyiv Stalingrada avenue, 04210 Kiyv, Ukraine 4Institute of Botany NASU; 2, Tereschenkivska St, 01601 Kiyv, Ukraine E-mail: [email protected] (BA), [email protected] (AB), [email protected] (TK, AL), [email protected] (PT) *Corresponding author Received: 13 November 2006 / Accepted: 2 August 2007 Abstract This review is a first attempt to summarize data on the records and distribution of 240 alien species in fresh water, brackish water and marine water areas of Ukraine, from unicellular algae up to fish. A checklist of alien species with their taxonomy, synonymy and with a complete bibliography of their first records is presented. Analysis of the main trends of alien species introduction, present ecological status, origin and pathways is considered. Key words: alien species, ballast water, Black Sea, distribution, invasion, Sea of Azov introduction of plants and animals to new areas Introduction increased over the ages. From the beginning of the 19th century, due to The range of organisms of different taxonomic rising technical progress, the influence of man groups varies with time, which can be attributed on nature has increased in geometrical to general processes of phylogenesis, to changes progression, gradually becoming comparable in in the contours of land and sea, forest and dimensions to climate impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Baikal Russian Federation
    LAKE BAIKAL RUSSIAN FEDERATION Lake Baikal is in south central Siberia close to the Mongolian border. It is the largest, oldest by 20 million years, and deepest, at 1,638m, of the world's lakes. It is 3.15 million hectares in size and contains a fifth of the world's unfrozen surface freshwater. Its age and isolation and unusually fertile depths have given it the world's richest and most unusual lacustrine fauna which, like the Galapagos islands’, is of outstanding value to evolutionary science. The exceptional variety of endemic animals and plants make the lake one of the most biologically diverse on earth. Threats to the site: Present threats are the untreated wastes from the river Selenga, potential oil and gas exploration in the Selenga delta, widespread lake-edge pollution and over-hunting of the Baikal seals. However, the threat of an oil pipeline along the lake’s north shore was averted in 2006 by Presidential decree and the pulp and cellulose mill on the southern shore which polluted 200 sq. km of the lake, caused some of the worst air pollution in Russia and genetic mutations in some of the lake’s endemic species, was closed in 2009 as no longer profitable to run. COUNTRY Russian Federation NAME Lake Baikal NATURAL WORLD HERITAGE SERIAL SITE 1996: Inscribed on the World Heritage List under Natural Criteria vii, viii, ix and x. STATEMENT OF OUTSTANDING UNIVERSAL VALUE The UNESCO World Heritage Committee issued the following statement at the time of inscription. Justification for Inscription The Committee inscribed Lake Baikal the most outstanding example of a freshwater ecosystem on the basis of: Criteria (vii), (viii), (ix) and (x).
    [Show full text]
  • Gap Analysis in Support of Cpan: the Russian Arctic
    CAFF Habitat Conservation Report No. 9 GAP ANALYSIS IN SUPPORT OF CPAN: THE RUSSIAN ARCTIC Igor Lysenko and David Henry CAFF INTERNATIONAL SECRETRARIAT 2000 This report, prepared by Igor Lysenko, World Conservation Monitoring Centre (WCMC) and David Henry, United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) Global Resource Information Database (GRID)-Arendal, is a technical account of a Gap Analysis Project conducted for the Russian Arctic in 1997-1999 in support of the Circumpolar Protected Areas Network (CPAN) of CAFF. It updates the status and spatial distribution of protected areas within the CAFF area of the Russian Federation and provides, in 22 GIs based maps and several data sets, a wealth of information relevant for present and future management decisions related to habitat conservation in the Russian Arctic. The present Gap Analysis for the Russian Arctic was undertaken in response to the CPAN Strategy and Action Plan requirement for countries to identify gaps in protected area coverage of ecosystems and species and to select sites for further action. Another important objective was to update the Russian data base. The Analysis used a system of twelve landscape units instead of the previously used vegetation zone system as the basis to classify Russia's ecosystems. A comparison of the terrestrial landscape systems against protected area coverage indicates that 27% of the glacier ecosystem is protected, 9.3% of the tundra (treeless portion) and 4.7% of the forest systems within the Arctic boundaries are under protection, but the most important Arctic forested areas have only 0.1% protection. In general, the analysis indicates a negative relationship between ecosystem productivity and protection, which is consistent with findings in 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • National Report on the Implementation of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands
    NATIONAL REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RAMSAR CONVENTION ON WETLANDS National Reports to be submitted to the 12th Meeting of the Conference of the Contracting Parties, Uruguay, 2015 Please submit the completed National Report in Microsoft Word format (.doc, 97-2003), as an electronic file (not a printed copy) and preferably by e-mail, to Alexia Dufour, Regional Affairs Officer, Ramsar Secretariat ([email protected]) by 1 September 2014. National Report Format for Ramsar COP12, page 2 The structure of the COP12 National Report Format The COP12 National Report Format (NRF) is in four sections: Section 1 provides the institutional information about the Administrative Authority and National Focal Points for the national implementation of the Convention. Section 2 is a ‘free-text’ section in which the Party is invited to provide a summary of various aspects of national implementation progress and recommendations for the future. Section 3 provides the 66 implementation indicator questions, grouped under each Convention implementation strategy in the Strategic Plan 2009-2015, and with an optional ‘free-text’ section under each indicator question in which the Contracting Party may, if it wishes, add further information on national implementation of that activity. Section 4 is an optional annex to allow any Contracting Party that so wishes to provide additional information regarding any or all of its Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Sites). General guidance for completing and submitting the COP12 National Report Format IMPORTANT – PLEASE READ THIS GUIDANCE SECTION BEFORE STARTING TO COMPLETE THE NATIONAL REPORT FORMAT 1. All Sections of the COP12 NRF should be completed in one of the Convention’s official languages (English, French, Spanish).
    [Show full text]
  • Ramsar Sites in Order of Addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance
    Ramsar sites in order of addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance RS# Country Site Name Desig’n Date 1 Australia Cobourg Peninsula 8-May-74 2 Finland Aspskär 28-May-74 3 Finland Söderskär and Långören 28-May-74 4 Finland Björkör and Lågskär 28-May-74 5 Finland Signilskär 28-May-74 6 Finland Valassaaret and Björkögrunden 28-May-74 7 Finland Krunnit 28-May-74 8 Finland Ruskis 28-May-74 9 Finland Viikki 28-May-74 10 Finland Suomujärvi - Patvinsuo 28-May-74 11 Finland Martimoaapa - Lumiaapa 28-May-74 12 Finland Koitilaiskaira 28-May-74 13 Norway Åkersvika 9-Jul-74 14 Sweden Falsterbo - Foteviken 5-Dec-74 15 Sweden Klingavälsån - Krankesjön 5-Dec-74 16 Sweden Helgeån 5-Dec-74 17 Sweden Ottenby 5-Dec-74 18 Sweden Öland, eastern coastal areas 5-Dec-74 19 Sweden Getterön 5-Dec-74 20 Sweden Store Mosse and Kävsjön 5-Dec-74 21 Sweden Gotland, east coast 5-Dec-74 22 Sweden Hornborgasjön 5-Dec-74 23 Sweden Tåkern 5-Dec-74 24 Sweden Kvismaren 5-Dec-74 25 Sweden Hjälstaviken 5-Dec-74 26 Sweden Ånnsjön 5-Dec-74 27 Sweden Gammelstadsviken 5-Dec-74 28 Sweden Persöfjärden 5-Dec-74 29 Sweden Tärnasjön 5-Dec-74 30 Sweden Tjålmejaure - Laisdalen 5-Dec-74 31 Sweden Laidaure 5-Dec-74 32 Sweden Sjaunja 5-Dec-74 33 Sweden Tavvavuoma 5-Dec-74 34 South Africa De Hoop Vlei 12-Mar-75 35 South Africa Barberspan 12-Mar-75 36 Iran, I. R.
    [Show full text]
  • Dry Grassland Vegetation of Central Podolia (Ukraine) - a Preliminary Overview of Its Syntaxonomy, Ecology and Biodiversity 391-430 Tuexenia 34: 391–430
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Tuexenia - Mitteilungen der Floristisch-soziologischen Arbeitsgemeinschaft Jahr/Year: 2014 Band/Volume: NS_34 Autor(en)/Author(s): Kuzenko Anna A., Becker Thomas, Didukh Yakiv P., Ardelean Ioana Violeta, Becker Ute, Beldean Monika, Dolnik Christian, Jeschke Michael, Naqinezhad Alireza, Ugurlu Emin, Unal Aslan, Vassilev Kiril, Vorona Evgeniy I., Yavorska Olena H., Dengler Jürgen Artikel/Article: Dry grassland vegetation of Central Podolia (Ukraine) - a preliminary overview of its syntaxonomy, ecology and biodiversity 391-430 Tuexenia 34: 391–430. Göttingen 2014. doi: 10.14471/2014.34.020, available online at www.tuexenia.de Dry grassland vegetation of Central Podolia (Ukraine) – a preliminary overview of its syntaxonomy, ecology and biodiversity Die Trockenrasenvegetation Zentral-Podoliens (Ukraine) – eine vorläufige Übersicht zu Syntaxonomie, Ökologie und Biodiversität Anna A. Kuzemko1, Thomas Becker2, Yakiv P. Didukh3, Ioana Violeta Arde- lean4, Ute Becker5, Monica Beldean4, Christian Dolnik6, Michael Jeschke2, Alireza Naqinezhad7, Emin Uğurlu8, Aslan Ünal9, Kiril Vassilev10, Evgeniy I. Vorona11, Olena H. Yavorska11 & Jürgen Dengler12,13,14,* 1National Dendrological Park “Sofiyvka”, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyivska Str. 12a, 20300 Uman’, Ukraine, [email protected];2Geobotany, Faculty of Geography and Geosciences, University of Trier, Behringstr. 21, 54296 Trier, Germany, [email protected];
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL PROTECTED AREAS of the RUSSIAN FEDERATION: of the RUSSIAN FEDERATION: AREAS PROTECTED NATIONAL Vladimir Krever, Mikhail Stishov, Irina Onufrenya
    WWF WWF is one of the world’s largest and most experienced independent conservation WWF-Russia organizations, with almost 5 million supporters and a global network active in more than 19, bld.3 Nikoloyamskaya St., 100 countries. 109240 Moscow WWF’s mission is to stop the degradation of the planet’s natural environment and to build a Russia future in which humans live in harmony with nature, by: Tel.: +7 495 727 09 39 • conserving the world’s biological diversity Fax: +7 495 727 09 38 • ensuring that the use of renewable natural resources is sustainable [email protected] • promoting the reduction of pollution and wasteful consumption. http://www.wwf.ru The Nature Conservancy The Nature Conservancy - the leading conservation organization working around the world to The Nature Conservancy protect ecologically important lands and waters for nature and people. Worldwide Office The mission of The Nature Conservancy is to preserve the plants, animals and natural 4245 North Fairfax Drive, Suite 100 NNATIONALATIONAL PPROTECTEDROTECTED AAREASREAS communities that represent the diversity of life on Earth by protecting the lands and waters Arlington, VA 22203-1606 they need to survive. Tel: +1 (703) 841-5300 http://www.nature.org OOFF TTHEHE RRUSSIANUSSIAN FFEDERATION:EDERATION: MAVA The mission of the Foundation is to contribute to maintaining terrestrial and aquatic Fondation pour la ecosystems, both qualitatively and quantitatively, with a view to preserving their biodiversity. Protection de la Nature GGAPAP AANALYSISNALYSIS To this end, it promotes scientific research, training and integrated management practices Le Petit Essert whose effectiveness has been proved, while securing a future for local populations in cultural, 1147 Montricher, Suisse economic and ecological terms.
    [Show full text]
  • Belarus, 1990
    Mammals of Belarus VLADIMIR DINETS Belarus is a large, very flat, 40% forested country. It lost almost a third of its population during WWII; the following decades saw mass migration of rural residents into cities, which accelerated after the country received most of Chernobyl nuclear fallout. In post-Soviet years Belarus rejected the siren song of IMF, so its economy remained in relatively good shape, but the birthrate was low, and many people emigrated. The result of all this is that the countryside is sparsely populated, particularly in the south where some of Europe’s largest wetlands are located. Tiny outlying villages (khutors), with just a few aged residents and plenty of abandoned houses, provide excellent bases for exploring forests and swamps. There are no endemics or “specialties”, but mammals are generally abundant, particularly in nature reserves. Belarus is often called “Europe’s last dictatorship”; this is only correct because Russia is no longer part of Europe. For twenty years President Lukashenko secured massive discounts on oil and gas by proclaiming loyalty to Russia and gradually sacrificing Belarus’s sovereignty. In 2014, Russian invasion of Ukraine alerted him to the danger of getting too cozy with such a predatory neighbor, so now he is trying to court the EU as well. As an East Slavic proverb goes, “a gentle calf suckles from two cows”. One consequence of this shift is that the country is reportedly becoming more Westerner-friendly (although even before 2014 it wasn’t a particularly inhospitable place, as long as you refrained from political discussions). Tourism is still virtually non-existent, but this might change in the coming years.
    [Show full text]
  • European Amazonia Nature-Based Tourism Development Scenario for Polesia
    European Amazonia Nature-based tourism development scenario for Polesia © Daniel Rosengren/FZS #VisitPolesia December 2019 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 3 Aims................................................................................................................................................ 4 Summary ........................................................................................................................................ 5 1. Destination Polesia ................................................................................................................. 6 1.1 Tourism on protected areas .............................................................................................. 9 1.2 Wildlife and birdwatching tourism ................................................................................... 13 1.3 Nuclear tourism ............................................................................................................... 15 1.4 Cultural heritage of Poleshuks ........................................................................................ 17 1.5 Agritourism....................................................................................................................... 19 1.6 Flood tourism ................................................................................................................... 21 2. Profiles of potential nature-based tourists ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geoecological Situation in the Volga-Akhtuba
    J. Wetlands Biodiversity (2015) 5: 115-126 CONSTRUCTIVE GEOGRAPHICAL MODEL OF THE LAKE-BASIN SPECIALIZED RECREATIONAL SYSTEM (ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE LAKE OSTRIVSKE, UKRAINIAN POLESIA) Vitaliy Martynyuk Received: 20.11.2014 / Accepted: 10.07.2015 Abstract: The question of the development of the lake basin system (LBS) model with the recreational oriented use is further discussed (take the example of the Ostrivske Lake, Ukrainian Polesia). The proposed LBS model is constructive geography by the content. It is presented by the lake depression bathymetric map, landscape-geographical maps of the water body, as a natural aquatic system, and different ranks of the natural territorial complexes of watershed. The tables illustrate the main limnological and landscape metric parameters of the basin system. The main directions of the recreational use of the Ostrivske LBS are grounded in the context of the sustainable natural resource management of the local areas. Keywords: lake, lake-basin system (LBS), model, natural aquatic complex (NAC), natural territorial complex (NTC), recreational natural resource management Introduction:1 kind of natural aquatic complex (NAC). The formation and development of the lakes are Ukrainian Polesia is one of the richest for the influenced by the geological, country’s regions of water bodies. According geomorphologic, meteorological, to the researchers, there are 3,429 slow flow hydrological, biotic and anthropogenic water bodies (SFWB) with a total area of factors. Therefore, we consider the lake 56,394.29 hectares, which is 0.51% of the landscape genesis in paragenetic and whole water resources of Polesie region paradynamic unity with its watershed and (Ilyin 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine on the Implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity
    Sixth National Report of Ukraine on the Implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity English version December, 2018 Kyiv – 2018 Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 4 Acknowledgements........................................................................................................................ 4 Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................ 5 Section I. Information on the targets being pursued at the national level .................................. 7 National Target 1 (NT1). Increasing the level of public environmental consciousness ............................... 7 National Target 2 (NT 2). Improving the environmental situation and increasing the level of environmental security ......................................................................................................................... 8 National Target 3 (NT 3). Attaining the environmental conditions safe for human health ..........................10 National Target 4 (NT 4). Integrating the environmental policy and improving the integrated environmental management system ......................................................................................................... 11 National Target 5 (NT 5). Halting the loss of biological and landscape diversity and establishing the ecological network .........................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • A Reference Guide for Conservation and Development. Mckinleyville, CA
    OVERVIEW OVERVIEW Newell, J. 2004. The Russian Far East: A Reference Guide for Conservation and Development. McKinleyville, CA: Daniel & Daniel. 466 pages 22 THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST OVERVIEW OVERVIEW Newell, J. 2004. The Russian Far East: A Reference Guide for Conservation and Development. McKinleyville, CA: Daniel & Daniel. 466 pages O v e r v i e w 23 OVERVIEW OVERVIEW Newell, J. 2004. The Russian Far East: A Reference Guide for Conservation and Development. McKinleyville, CA: Daniel & Daniel. 466 pages 24 THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST OVERVIEW OVERVIEW Newell, J. 2004. The Russian Far East: A Reference Guide for Conservation and Development. McKinleyville, CA: Daniel & Daniel. 466 pages O v e r v i e w 25 OVERVIEW OVERVIEW Newell, J. 2004. The Russian Far East: A Reference Guide for Conservation and Development. McKinleyville, CA: Daniel & Daniel. 466 pages 26 THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST OVERVIEW OVERVIEW Newell, J. 2004. The Russian Far East: A Reference Guide for Conservation and Development. McKinleyville, CA: Daniel & Daniel. 466 pages O v e r v i e w 27 OVERVIEW OVERVIEW Newell, J. 2004. The Russian Far East: A Reference Guide for Conservation and Development. McKinleyville, CA: Daniel & Daniel. 466 pages 28 THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST OVERVIEW OVERVIEW permafrost becomes swampy, however, organic matter quick- Ecology ly decomposes, releasing trapped methane and CO2 from the plant matter and soil. Methane is a powerful greenhouse gas Josh Newell and Vladimir Dinets with a warming effect ten to twenty times higher than that of Researchers and scholars have written extensively on the envi- CO2. Logging, mining, and other industrial activity can also ronmental destruction that occurred under the Soviet Union.
    [Show full text]