Geoecological Situation in the Volga-Akhtuba
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Trends of Aquatic Alien Species Invasions in Ukraine
Aquatic Invasions (2007) Volume 2, Issue 3: 215-242 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3391/ai.2007.2.3.8 Open Access © 2007 The Author(s) Journal compilation © 2007 REABIC Research Article Trends of aquatic alien species invasions in Ukraine Boris Alexandrov1*, Alexandr Boltachev2, Taras Kharchenko3, Artiom Lyashenko3, Mikhail Son1, Piotr Tsarenko4 and Valeriy Zhukinsky3 1Odessa Branch, Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (NASU); 37, Pushkinska St, 65125 Odessa, Ukraine 2Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas NASU; 2, Nakhimova avenue, 99011 Sevastopol, Ukraine 3Institute of Hydrobiology NASU; 12, Geroyiv Stalingrada avenue, 04210 Kiyv, Ukraine 4Institute of Botany NASU; 2, Tereschenkivska St, 01601 Kiyv, Ukraine E-mail: [email protected] (BA), [email protected] (AB), [email protected] (TK, AL), [email protected] (PT) *Corresponding author Received: 13 November 2006 / Accepted: 2 August 2007 Abstract This review is a first attempt to summarize data on the records and distribution of 240 alien species in fresh water, brackish water and marine water areas of Ukraine, from unicellular algae up to fish. A checklist of alien species with their taxonomy, synonymy and with a complete bibliography of their first records is presented. Analysis of the main trends of alien species introduction, present ecological status, origin and pathways is considered. Key words: alien species, ballast water, Black Sea, distribution, invasion, Sea of Azov introduction of plants and animals to new areas Introduction increased over the ages. From the beginning of the 19th century, due to The range of organisms of different taxonomic rising technical progress, the influence of man groups varies with time, which can be attributed on nature has increased in geometrical to general processes of phylogenesis, to changes progression, gradually becoming comparable in in the contours of land and sea, forest and dimensions to climate impact. -
National Report on the Implementation of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands
NATIONAL REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RAMSAR CONVENTION ON WETLANDS National Reports to be submitted to the 12th Meeting of the Conference of the Contracting Parties, Uruguay, 2015 Please submit the completed National Report in Microsoft Word format (.doc, 97-2003), as an electronic file (not a printed copy) and preferably by e-mail, to Alexia Dufour, Regional Affairs Officer, Ramsar Secretariat ([email protected]) by 1 September 2014. National Report Format for Ramsar COP12, page 2 The structure of the COP12 National Report Format The COP12 National Report Format (NRF) is in four sections: Section 1 provides the institutional information about the Administrative Authority and National Focal Points for the national implementation of the Convention. Section 2 is a ‘free-text’ section in which the Party is invited to provide a summary of various aspects of national implementation progress and recommendations for the future. Section 3 provides the 66 implementation indicator questions, grouped under each Convention implementation strategy in the Strategic Plan 2009-2015, and with an optional ‘free-text’ section under each indicator question in which the Contracting Party may, if it wishes, add further information on national implementation of that activity. Section 4 is an optional annex to allow any Contracting Party that so wishes to provide additional information regarding any or all of its Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Sites). General guidance for completing and submitting the COP12 National Report Format IMPORTANT – PLEASE READ THIS GUIDANCE SECTION BEFORE STARTING TO COMPLETE THE NATIONAL REPORT FORMAT 1. All Sections of the COP12 NRF should be completed in one of the Convention’s official languages (English, French, Spanish). -
Ramsar Sites in Order of Addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance
Ramsar sites in order of addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance RS# Country Site Name Desig’n Date 1 Australia Cobourg Peninsula 8-May-74 2 Finland Aspskär 28-May-74 3 Finland Söderskär and Långören 28-May-74 4 Finland Björkör and Lågskär 28-May-74 5 Finland Signilskär 28-May-74 6 Finland Valassaaret and Björkögrunden 28-May-74 7 Finland Krunnit 28-May-74 8 Finland Ruskis 28-May-74 9 Finland Viikki 28-May-74 10 Finland Suomujärvi - Patvinsuo 28-May-74 11 Finland Martimoaapa - Lumiaapa 28-May-74 12 Finland Koitilaiskaira 28-May-74 13 Norway Åkersvika 9-Jul-74 14 Sweden Falsterbo - Foteviken 5-Dec-74 15 Sweden Klingavälsån - Krankesjön 5-Dec-74 16 Sweden Helgeån 5-Dec-74 17 Sweden Ottenby 5-Dec-74 18 Sweden Öland, eastern coastal areas 5-Dec-74 19 Sweden Getterön 5-Dec-74 20 Sweden Store Mosse and Kävsjön 5-Dec-74 21 Sweden Gotland, east coast 5-Dec-74 22 Sweden Hornborgasjön 5-Dec-74 23 Sweden Tåkern 5-Dec-74 24 Sweden Kvismaren 5-Dec-74 25 Sweden Hjälstaviken 5-Dec-74 26 Sweden Ånnsjön 5-Dec-74 27 Sweden Gammelstadsviken 5-Dec-74 28 Sweden Persöfjärden 5-Dec-74 29 Sweden Tärnasjön 5-Dec-74 30 Sweden Tjålmejaure - Laisdalen 5-Dec-74 31 Sweden Laidaure 5-Dec-74 32 Sweden Sjaunja 5-Dec-74 33 Sweden Tavvavuoma 5-Dec-74 34 South Africa De Hoop Vlei 12-Mar-75 35 South Africa Barberspan 12-Mar-75 36 Iran, I. R. -
European Amazonia Nature-Based Tourism Development Scenario for Polesia
European Amazonia Nature-based tourism development scenario for Polesia © Daniel Rosengren/FZS #VisitPolesia December 2019 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 3 Aims................................................................................................................................................ 4 Summary ........................................................................................................................................ 5 1. Destination Polesia ................................................................................................................. 6 1.1 Tourism on protected areas .............................................................................................. 9 1.2 Wildlife and birdwatching tourism ................................................................................... 13 1.3 Nuclear tourism ............................................................................................................... 15 1.4 Cultural heritage of Poleshuks ........................................................................................ 17 1.5 Agritourism....................................................................................................................... 19 1.6 Flood tourism ................................................................................................................... 21 2. Profiles of potential nature-based tourists ........................................................................... -
Chapter 5 Drainage Basin of the Black Sea
165 CHAPTER 5 DRAINAGE BASIN OF THE BLACK SEA This chapter deals with the assessment of transboundary rivers, lakes and groundwa- ters, as well as selected Ramsar Sites and other wetlands of transboundary importance, which are located in the basin of the Black Sea. Assessed transboundary waters in the drainage basin of the Black Sea Transboundary groundwaters Ramsar Sites/wetlands of Basin/sub-basin(s) Recipient Riparian countries Lakes in the basin within the basin transboundary importance Rezovska/Multudere Black Sea BG, TR Danube Black Sea AT, BA, BG, Reservoirs Silurian-Cretaceous (MD, RO, Lower Danube Green Corridor and HR, CZ, DE, Iron Gate I and UA), Q,N1-2,Pg2-3,Cr2 (RO, UA), Delta Wetlands (BG, MD, RO, UA) HU, MD, ME, Iron Gate II, Dobrudja/Dobrogea Neogene- RO, RS, SI, Lake Neusiedl Sarmatian (BG-RO), Dobrudja/ CH, UA Dobrogea Upper Jurassic-Lower Cretaceous (BG-RO), South Western Backa/Dunav aquifer (RS, HR), Northeast Backa/ Danube -Tisza Interfluve or Backa/Danube-Tisza Interfluve aquifer (RS, HU), Podunajska Basin, Zitny Ostrov/Szigetköz, Hanság-Rábca (HU), Komarnanska Vysoka Kryha/Dunántúli – középhegység északi rész (HU) - Lech Danube AT, DE - Inn Danube AT, DE, IT, CH - Morava Danube AT, CZ, SK Floodplains of the Morava- Dyje-Danube Confluence --Dyje Morava AT, CZ - Raab/Rába Danube AT, HU Rába shallow aquifer, Rába porous cold and thermal aquifer, Rába Kőszeg mountain fractured aquifer, Günser Gebirge Umland, Günstal, Hügelland Raab Ost, Hügelland Raab West, Hügelland Rabnitz, Lafnitztal, Pinkatal 1, Pinkatal 2, Raabtal, -
Important Bird Areas and Potential Ramsar Sites in Europe
cover def. 25-09-2001 14:23 Pagina 1 BirdLife in Europe In Europe, the BirdLife International Partnership works in more than 40 countries. Important Bird Areas ALBANIA and potential Ramsar Sites ANDORRA AUSTRIA BELARUS in Europe BELGIUM BULGARIA CROATIA CZECH REPUBLIC DENMARK ESTONIA FAROE ISLANDS FINLAND FRANCE GERMANY GIBRALTAR GREECE HUNGARY ICELAND IRELAND ISRAEL ITALY LATVIA LIECHTENSTEIN LITHUANIA LUXEMBOURG MACEDONIA MALTA NETHERLANDS NORWAY POLAND PORTUGAL ROMANIA RUSSIA SLOVAKIA SLOVENIA SPAIN SWEDEN SWITZERLAND TURKEY UKRAINE UK The European IBA Programme is coordinated by the European Division of BirdLife International. For further information please contact: BirdLife International, Droevendaalsesteeg 3a, PO Box 127, 6700 AC Wageningen, The Netherlands Telephone: +31 317 47 88 31, Fax: +31 317 47 88 44, Email: [email protected], Internet: www.birdlife.org.uk This report has been produced with the support of: Printed on environmentally friendly paper What is BirdLife International? BirdLife International is a Partnership of non-governmental conservation organisations with a special focus on birds. The BirdLife Partnership works together on shared priorities, policies and programmes of conservation action, exchanging skills, achievements and information, and so growing in ability, authority and influence. Each Partner represents a unique geographic area or territory (most often a country). In addition to Partners, BirdLife has Representatives and a flexible system of Working Groups (including some bird Specialist Groups shared with Wetlands International and/or the Species Survival Commission (SSC) of the World Conservation Union (IUCN)), each with specific roles and responsibilities. I What is the purpose of BirdLife International? – Mission Statement The BirdLife International Partnership strives to conserve birds, their habitats and global biodiversity, working with people towards sustainability in the use of natural resources. -
Ukraine on the Implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity
Sixth National Report of Ukraine on the Implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity English version December, 2018 Kyiv – 2018 Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 4 Acknowledgements........................................................................................................................ 4 Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................ 5 Section I. Information on the targets being pursued at the national level .................................. 7 National Target 1 (NT1). Increasing the level of public environmental consciousness ............................... 7 National Target 2 (NT 2). Improving the environmental situation and increasing the level of environmental security ......................................................................................................................... 8 National Target 3 (NT 3). Attaining the environmental conditions safe for human health ..........................10 National Target 4 (NT 4). Integrating the environmental policy and improving the integrated environmental management system ......................................................................................................... 11 National Target 5 (NT 5). Halting the loss of biological and landscape diversity and establishing the ecological network .........................................................................................................12 -
The Selected Hydrotechnical Conditions of the Dnieper – Bug
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Bulletin of the Maritime Institute in Gdańsk The selected hydrotechnical conditions of the Dnieper – Bug Channel and the Pripyat River in the development of the International Waterway E40 Wybrane warunki hydrotechniczne kanału Dniepr – Bug i rzeki Prypeć w rozwoju Międzynarodowej Drogi Wodnej E40 Marcin Kalinowski1, Rafał Koba1, Patrycja Jerzyło2 1Instytut Morski w Gdańsku. Zakład Ekonomiki i Prawa 2Politechnika Gdańska. Wydział Inżynierii Lądowej i Środowiska Article history: Received: 15.09.2017 Accepted: 15.12.2017 Published: 30.12.2017 Abstract: International waterway E40 (MDW E40) is included in the network of inland waterways of transnational importance. It is a link between two areas: the Baltic Sea and the Black Sea. The E40 route runs through three countries: Poland, Belarus, and Ukraine. The article presents the results of the study on the analysis of two very important sections of the MDW E40 on the Belarusian section, namely: the Dnieper – Bug Channel and the Pripy River. Both elements, from the point of view of navigability, are the most important links throughout the Belarusian section of the waterway. This article will be useful for the development of plans for revitalization of the international waterw ay E40 not only on the Belarus part, but also in Poland and Ukraine. Due to the accession and signature by Poland of the AGN Convention in January 2017, the article can constitute a material to supporting state policy in the context of the = the inland waterway system’s development in Poland and Europe. Keywords: Dnieper – Bug channel, AGN convention, E40 Inland Waterway, revitalization, inland navigation Streszczenie: Międzynarodowa droga wodna E40 (MDW E40) wpisana jest w sieć dróg wodnych śródlądowych o znaczeniu ponadnaro- dowym. -
Polissia Initiative
OMNI-Net Ukraine Child Development Programs Elevated Population Rates of Malformations in a Region Impacted by Chornobyl Radiation Call for a Technical Assessment and Prospects Draft POLISSIA INITIATIVE Editor: W. Wertelecki, M.D. NOTE: THE LIST OF CREDITS IS EVOLVING Contributors: O. Britsyna1, C. Chambers2, R. Garrutɨ3, S. Lapchenko4, B. Wang5, W. Wertelecki6, L. Yevtushok7, N. Zymak-Zakutnyɚ8 Review Panel: N. Afanasiyeva9, V. Davydiuk10, Y. Korzhynsky11, S. Lepekha12, O. Nahorniuk13, S. Onishchenko14, E. Patskun15, A. Ropotan16, H. Sapsay17, H. Vashchylin18 1Ethnology Institute, Kyiv; 2University of California SanDiego, US; 3State University of New York, Binghamton, US; 4OMNI-Net Ukraine, Volyn; 5 University of South Alabama, Mobile, US; 6OMNI-Net Ukraine, Mobile, Alabama, US; 7OMNI-Net Ukraine, Rivne; 8OMNI-Net Ukraine, Khmelnytsky; 9OMNI-Net Ukraine, Crimea; 10Lesia Ukrainka Volyn National University; 11Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University; 12Rivne Regional Clinical Diagnostic Center; 13Rivne Museum of Regional Studies; 14OMNI-Net Ukraine, Kherson; 15OMNI-Net Ukraine, Zakarpattia; 16Khmelnytsky City Perinatal Center; 17Rivne National University of Water Management and Nature Resources Use; 18Volyn Regional Children’s Territorial Medical Center Winter 2011 Contact: [email protected] Omni-Net Ukraine Polissia Initiative - Winter 2011 Elevated Population Rates of Malformations in a Region Impacted by Chornobyl Ionizing Radiation POLISSIA INITIATIVE GOALS Investigations of Reproductive Risks and Pregnancy Outcomes -
Shooting Locations Guide Ukraine Contents
SHOOTING LOCATIONS GUIDE UKRAINE CONTENTS Cherkasy Oblast ........................................... 3 Chernihiv Oblast .......................................... 6 Chernivtsi Oblast .......................................... 9 Dnipro Oblast ............................................... 11 Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast ................................ 12 Kharkiv Oblast .............................................. 15 Kherson Oblast ............................................. 17 Khmelnytskyi Oblast .................................... 20 Kyiv Oblast .................................................... 22 Lviv Oblast ..................................................... 27 Mykolaiv Oblast ............................................ 31 Odesa Oblast ................................................ 33 Poltava Oblast ............................................... 35 Rivne Oblast ................................................ 36 Sumy Oblast ................................................ 38 Vinnytsia Oblast ............................................ 40 Volyn Oblast ................................................ 41 Zakarpattia Oblast ........................................ 43 Zaporizhzhia Oblast ..................................... 46 Zhytomyr Oblast ........................................... 48 Ternopil Oblast ............................................. 49 — Nature reserve — Biosphere reserve — Industry building — National park — Historical and cultural reserve CHERKASY OBLAST Local authorities Cherkasy city Council 36 Baidy Vyshnevetskoho -
Kayaking Along the Bug River Kayaking Along the Bug River
Kayaking along the Bug river Kayaking along the Bug river Kayaking www.lubelskie.pl KAYAKING ALONG THE BUG RIVER WOJEWÓDZTWO LUBELSKIE Editorial co-fi nanced by the European Regional Development Fund under the framework tourist guide of Regional Operational Programme of the Lubelskie Region 2007–2013. The Borderland Bug N www.lubelskie.pl Published by Marshal’s Offi ce of Lubelskie Voivodeship 20-074 Lublin, ul. Spokojna 4 tel.: +48 81 44 16 789 fax: +48 81 44 16 790 e-mail: [email protected], www.lubelskie.pl Text by: Józef Tworek Proofreading by: Adam Niedbał Figures and maps by: Józef Tworek Coordination of the project – Piotr Franaszek, Darek Donica (Director of the Promotion and Tourism Department) Publishing coordination: Joanna Opiela-Basińska Photos by: Olgierd Bielak, Daniel Dadun, Marcin Dąbrowski, Lesław Flaga, Jacek Fuchs, Stanisław Gębski, Marta Gołębiowska, Agnieszka Jaroszyńska, Grzegorz Jaworski, Marzena Kalinowska, Krzysztof Kowalczyk, Andrzej Koziara, Kamila Lis, Kalina Łapińska (Lublin Landscape Parks Complex archive), Andrzej Łazeba, Marek Pomietło, Leon Sapko, Rafał Siek, Monika Tarajko, Stanisław Turski, Józef Tworek, Maciek Zbarachewicz, Michał Zieliński, Tadeusz Żaczek and archives: Marshal’s Offi ce of Lubelskie Voivodeship, PTTK Włodawa, UKS KIKO Zamość, www.kajaki.nadbugiem.pl ISBN 978-83-63221-41-6 FREE COPY WOJEWÓDZTWO LUBELSKIE Editorial co-fi nanced by the European Regional Development Fund under the framework of Regional Operational Programme of the Lubelskie Region 2007–2013. Translated by: AGIT Agnieszka Rydz Graphic design: Krzysztof Hosaja (Amistad Sp. z o.o.) Typesetting and printed by: Drukarnia Comernet Kayaking along the Bug River Józef Tworek KAYAKING ALONG THE BUG RIVER Second Revised Edition tourist guide 2 Kayaking along the Bug River TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword . -
1941-08-24 [P C-3]
« Russians Give Ground, but Still Hold Most of Key Cities and Retain Morale « Slowly ι sibly to Kiev. Berlin claimed the de- the note was delivered in London, and struction of 25 Red divisions around on Friday the Iranian Minister to the Review of 103d Week of War DONETS IASIN «s eastern ? Gomel. Ukraine's greatest industrial, mm TO THE CAUCASUS United States said in Washington ther· eril belt. Steel mills. cHemical In the battle for Leningrad the Fin- were only 700 Germans in his country. By Blair Bolles. factories, automotive plants con nish advance from the nortn was con- centrated here He said also that Iran would fight any but the after invader, no matter what flag he car- The German strength pushed slowlj but successfully against the i tinually steady, Germans, making good time early in the week, ried. He conferred with Secretary of Russian resistance last week, and today half of the Ukraine, about which were slowed down at the end. The Pinns State Hull and received assurances that Hitler has made hungry speeches in years past, belongs to-the Nazis. are only 50 miles from Leningrad. the United States would not support Leningrad is menaced Odessa is ready for besieging. The Germans and While the German drive a British or a Russian military move their have earned their invasion two-pronged allies 300 miles, with the Russian Iran. This was a curious an- ajgout on Leningrad, from the west and from against campaign now in its third month. The claims of the bombastic and hyperbolic the south, was in its early-week swift nouncement, time probably will dis- enemies the German and the Russian put losses during the first eight stage, the Nazis took the three towns close its purpose.