A Built Tomb from Middle Bronze Age IIA and Other Finds at Tel Burga in the Sharon Plain

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Built Tomb from Middle Bronze Age IIA and Other Finds at Tel Burga in the Sharon Plain ‘Atiqot 68, 2011 A Built tomB from middle Bronze Age IIA And other finds At tel BurgA in the shAron PlAin Amir golAni Two soundings were carried out at Tel Burga and Early Islamic periods. The site comprises (Tall or Kh. el-Bureij on the British mandate a circular-shaped plateau covering an area maps and in the mandatory archives), located of more than 250 dunams (Plan 1). Artificial 1 km east of modern Binyamina in the Sharon earthworks defining the perimeter of the tell coastal plain (map ref. NIG 19700/71400; OIG are clearly visible in aerial photographs and are 14700/21400; Fig. 1).1 Extensive surveys of the most pronounced along the site’s southern and site and its surroundings (Conder and Kitchener western perimeters. 1882:52; Gophna and Kochavi 1967; 1972; The tell has been identified as a fortified MB Kallai and Mazar 1971; Olami 1984:200, Site IIA enclosure. The large plateau rises only a few 241; Olami, Sender and Oren 2005: Site 89) meters above its immediate surroundings and have revealed lithic finds from the Lower and slopes down moderately from south to north. Middle Paleolithic periods, as well as ceramic Two low hillocks are located along the southern evidence from the Chalcolithic period, the edge of the tell within the enclosure, where the Early Bronze Age, Middle Bronze Age II, the slope is most pronounced, rising nearly 10 m Iron Age, and the Persian, Roman, Byzantine above the surrounding plain. The northern 195 000 198 000 199 000 200 000 194 000 196 000 197 000 193 000 716 000 Tel Mevorakh Shuni Quarry Shuni Site 18 Nahal ‘Ada 715 Ari’el 000 Nahal Taninim Bet Hananya Tel Burga 714 000 Binyamina Or ‘Aqiva 713 Nahal ‘Ada 000 Nahal Barqan 0 1 km 712 000 Fig. 1. Location of Tel Burga. 70 Amir golAni perimeter is bounded by Nahal Tanninim, a large cemetery with shaft tombs of the a now-dry streambed. All the published Intermediate Bronze Age, MB IIA and MB IIB pottery, collected from both excavations and was recently excavated at the Shuni Quarry surveys in the enclosure, has been attributed (Peilstöcker and Sklar-Parnes 2005). Major exclusively to MB IIA (Kochavi, Beck and sites in the region where MB II remains have Gophna 1979:143); however, large amounts of been excavated include Tel Megadim, on the ceramic material from the Intermediate Bronze Mediterranean coast 20 km to the north (Wolff Age were discovered following deep plowing 1998), Tel Esur, 5 km to the southeast (Dothan in the eastern portion of the site, attesting 1970), and Tel Zeror, 12 km to the south to a settlement from this period within the (Kochavi, Beck and Gophna 1979). confines of the enclosure.2 The easternmost The present report describes the results of hillock bears occupation remains from the two limited soundings within the area of the Roman and medieval periods, including ashlar enclosure, located 260 m apart (Areas A and masonry, granite columns and sarcophagi.3 The B; Plan 1). Although the total excavated area Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age pottery is very limited in scope, the results obtained collected in the surveys was very limited and in these two soundings are important for our apparently originated from chalk material understanding of the history of the site. brought from outside the site for construction of the artificial rampart (Olami, Sender and AreA A Oren 2005:40*). The site of Tel Burga is now traversed from This area is positioned in the western portion of east to west by a dirt road, and much of the the site, 125 m north of the western summit in area of the tell itself has been planted over the south of the tell and adjacent to the modern with vineyards and orchards. Prior to extensive dirt road (Plan 1). A large, 6 × 8 m square was cultivation and deep plowing on the plateau excavated, which was later expanded 2.5 m to of the tell in recent decades, the outline of at the west (Plan 2). The archaeological remains least two rectangular fortification towers (A had been damaged by a modern pipeline trench and B; see Plan 1) were still visible at the crest that cut through the southern portion of the of the artificial ramparts on the southern and square. Prior to excavation, a mechanical test western perimeters of the tell. The outline of trench was sunken to the west of the area to be much of the fortification wall could also be excavated, revealing stone building debris from discerned, interrupted by a gap on the eastern close to the surface down to a depth of 1.5 m, side. A limited excavation was conducted in below which was sterile hamra soil. 1971 (Plan 1:C), revealing a mudbrick gateway Excavation within the main square exposed attributed to MB IIA (Gophna and Kochavi remains of a thin and severely eroded 1972; Kochavi, Beck and Gophna 1979:142– occupation level lying directly upon a very 150). packed and marly layer of sterile hamra and Previous surveys and excavations in the small stone chips. The occupation remains vicinity of Tel Burga have revealed several consisted of several rounded, shallow pits (L6, MB IIA sites (Fig. 1), including Tel Mevorakh, L21), filled with stones in a dark gray matrix, 4 km to the northwest, where remains of a that included limited ceramic remains (Fig. 2). large building or fort surrounded by a rural Adjacent to Pit 21 were the remains of an settlement and later fortified by a rampart have occupation surface with fragmentary ceramic been excavated (Stern 1984). More recently, remains (L5). Several concentrations of stones limited remains of a rural MB IIA settlement upon the sterile layer along the southern and were discovered at Shuni Site 18, 2 km to the eastern boundaries of the excavated area may northwest (Gorzalczany 2005). In addition, represent heavily eroded architectural remains. An mB IIA tomB And other finds At tel BurgA 71 18 19 Existing electric 20 pylon 20 21 19 C 23 Area B 22 18 23 B 20 Existing electric 21 Tel Burga 24 Area A pylon 19 25 20 Dirt road 27 21 22 30 33 29 23 26 A 26 100 Southern 25 0 m hillocks 24 Plan 1. Tel Burga and the location of the excavation areas (after Kochavi, Beck and Gophna 1979). 27.28 26.01 27.16 L21 27.25 W2 L5 L5 27.28 27.30 26.92 26.00 26.54 27.36 23.88 W9 25.90 L10 26.44 26.00 Mechanical trench W8 L20 26.92 27.12 27.03 26.01 L8 25.83 W1 27.23 W7 26.98 27.42 27.33 L9 27.30 25.91 L18 27.12 L6 26.96 27.28 27.29 L4 Pipeline trench 0 2 27.44 m 27.32 Plan 2. Area A. 72 Amir golAni In the southeastern corner of Area A, a pit although in contrast to the other two, the head (L4) contained three primary, articulated adult was oriented northeast. Aside from a fragment burials closely arranged in ‘sardine’ fashion of a sheep/goat scapula lying next to the left (Fig. 3). The westernmost skeleton was a femur of the easternmost skeleton, no other male, 17–20 years of age, the head oriented burial goods were found in association with southwest, lying on its right side in a flexed these interments. position.4 The middle skeleton, 15–18 years of age and of undetermined sex, was lying on its Subterranean Tomb side in an outstretched position with the head In the northwestern corner of the excavated to the southwest and the hands crossed over area, the remains of a stone burial structure the chest. The easternmost skeleton was a male were exposed (Plans 2, 3). Consequently, the just over 20 years of age, also lying on its back, excavation was expanded to the west to fully Fig. 2. A concentration of stones and ceramic remains found within a shallow pit (L6) sunken into a sterile matrix, looking west. Fig. 3. Remains of three articulated burials in a shallow pit (L4), looking east. An mB IIA tomB And other finds At tel BurgA 73 expose this feature. A square (3 × 3 m) burial initial burial phase (L20; see Plan 3: Section structure was revealed, sunken nearly 1.5 m into 1–1; Figs. 4, 5). At the bottom of the pit, the ground. Excavation of this structure revealed outside the structure to the west, were several two burial phases. smashed vessels (L19; see Fig. 14:3, 4), which may indicate that the tomb had been entered The Early Burial Phase.— In the earliest phase, and rifled at least once after the initial burial a deep pit was dug into the sterile hamra and phase, or perhaps they are the remains of lined with four walls (W1, W2, W7, W9) to post-mortem rituals. The manner in which the form a subterranean square structure (Plan tomb was roofed remains unclear; no stone 3). The walls were built of one to two rows slabs were found within the tomb. Several of medium-sized fieldstones, preserved seven large stones, strewn haphazardly in the central courses high. Access to the burial chamber was area of the structure, suggest the existence of through a 1.5 m deep semicircular pit that led a collapsed stone pillar or a stone pillar-base. into a 1.25 m wide entrance in the western The pillar probably carried a wooden column wall of the chamber (W9).
Recommended publications
  • List of Rivers of Israel
    Sl. No River Name Draining Into 1 Nahal Betzet Mediterranean Sea 2 Nahal Kziv Mediterranean Sea 3 Ga'aton River Mediterranean Sea 4 Nahal Na‘aman Mediterranean Sea 5 Kishon River Mediterranean Sea 6 Nahal Taninim Mediterranean Sea 7 Hadera Stream Mediterranean Sea 8 Nahal Alexander Mediterranean Sea 9 Nahal Poleg Mediterranean Sea 10 Yarkon River Mediterranean Sea 11 Ayalon River Mediterranean Sea 12 Nahal Qana Mediterranean Sea 13 Nahal Shillo Mediterranean Sea 14 Nahal Sorek Mediterranean Sea 15 Lakhish River Mediterranean Sea 16 Nahal Shikma Mediterranean Sea 17 HaBesor Stream Mediterranean Sea 18 Nahal Gerar Mediterranean Sea 19 Nahal Be'er Sheva Mediterranean Sea 20 Nahal Havron Mediterranean Sea 21 Jordan River Dead Sea 22 Nahal Harod Dead Sea 23 Nahal Yissakhar Dead Sea 24 Nahal Tavor Dead Sea 25 Yarmouk River Dead Sea 26 Nahal Yavne’el Dead Sea 27 Nahal Arbel Dead Sea 28 Nahal Amud Dead Sea 29 Nahal Korazim Dead Sea 30 Nahal Hazor Dead Sea 31 Nahal Dishon Dead Sea 32 Hasbani River Dead Sea 33 Nahal Ayun Dead Sea 34 Dan River Dead Sea 35 Banias River Dead Sea 36 Nahal HaArava Dead Sea 37 Nahal Neqarot Dead Sea 38 Nahal Ramon Dead Sea 39 Nahal Shivya Dead Sea 40 Nahal Paran Dead Sea 41 Nahal Hiyyon Dead Sea 42 Nahal Zin Dead Sea 43 Tze'elim Stream Dead Sea 44 Nahal Mishmar Dead Sea 45 Nahal Hever Dead Sea 46 Nahal Shahmon Red Sea (Gulf of Aqaba) 47 Nahal Shelomo Red Sea (Gulf of Aqaba) For more information kindly visit : www.downloadexcelfiles.com www.downloadexcelfiles.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Biblical Creatures: the Animal As an Object of Interpretation in Pre-Modern Christian and Jewish Hermeneutic Traditions – an Introduction 7–15
    vol 5 · 2018 Biblical Creatures The Animal as an Object of Interpretation in Pre-Modern Christian and Jewish Hermeneutic Traditions Karel Appel, Femmes, enfants, animaux, 1951: oil on jute, 170 x 280 cm © Cobra Museum voor Moderne Kunst Amstelveen – by SIAE 2018 Published by vol 5 · 2018 Università degli studi di Milano, Dipartimento di Studi letterari, filologici e linguistici: riviste.unimi.it/interfaces/ Edited by Paolo Borsa Christian Høgel Lars Boje Mortensen Elizabeth Tyler Initiated by Centre for Medieval Literature (SDU & York) with a grant from the The Danish National Research Foundation università degli studi di milano, dipartimento di studi letterari, filologici e linguistici centre for medieval literature Contents Astrid Lembke Biblical Creatures: The Animal as an Object of Interpretation in Pre-Modern Christian and Jewish Hermeneutic Traditions – an Introduction 7–15 Beatrice Trînca The Bride and the Wounds − “columba mea in foraminibus petrae” (Ct. 2.14) 16–30 Elke Koch A Staggering Vision: The Mediating Animal in the Textual Tradition of S. Eustachius 31–48 Julia Weitbrecht “Thou hast heard me from the horns of the unicorns:” The Biblical Unicorn in Late Medieval Religious Interpretation 49–64 David Rotman Textual Animals Turned into Narrative Fantasies: The Imaginative Middle Ages 65–77 Johannes Traulsen The Desert Fathers’ Beasts: Crocodiles in Medieval German Monastic Literature 78–89 Oren Roman A Man Fighting a Lion: A Christian ‘Theme’ in Yiddish Epics 90–110 Andreas Kraß The Hyena’s Cave:Jeremiah 12.9 in Premodern Bestiaries 111–128 Sara Offenberg Animal Attraction: Hidden Polemics in Biblical Animal Illuminations of the Michael Mahzor 129–153 Bernd Roling Zurück ins Paradies.
    [Show full text]
  • Sitonini of Israel (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Entiminae) 1Museo
    ISRAEL JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGY, Vol. 40, 2010, pp. 71–108 Sitonini of Israel (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Entiminae) ANTONIO J. VELÁZQUEZ DE CASTRO,1 ARIEL-LEIB-LEONID FRIEDMAN,2 AND ROMAN BOROVEC3 1Museo Valenciano de Historia Natural, Fundación Torres-Sala, Paseo de Pechina, 15, 46008 Valencia, Spain. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Zoology, The George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel. E-mail: [email protected] 3Husovo náměstí 48, 503 15 Nechanice, Czech Republic. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT A survey of the weevil tribe Sitonini was conducted in Israel, recording a total of 23 species in four genera. Sitona aliciae Velázquez de Castro n. sp. and S. wahrmani Velázquez de Castro and Friedman n. sp. are described, and five additional Sitona species (S. brucki Allard, S. demoflysi Normand, S. fairmaieri Allard, S. lepidus Gyllenhal, S. puncticollis Stephens, and Sche- lopius planifrons Fåhraeus) are recorded from Israel for the first time. Geni- talia illustrations are given for new and poorly known species (i.e., S. brucki, S. syriacus Stierlin, S. fairmairei, and S. demoflysi). Data on the distribution and host plants of species and keys for their determination are provided. KEYWORDS: Charagmus, Coelositona, Schelopius, Sitona, new species, identification key, taxonomy, zoogeography INTRODUCTION Sitonini is a tribe within the broad-nosed weevils (Entiminae), which is widely dis- tributed in the Palaearctic and Nearctic regions and in parts of the Palaeotropic region (South Africa, Madagascar, southeast Asia). No native Sitonini are known from South America, Australasia, and tropical Africa, but a few pest Sitona species were introduced into these regions and have been spreading there in recent years (Velázquez de Castro et al., 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Abstracts
    PAPER ABSTRACTS Plenary Address Eric H. Cline (The George Washington University), “Dirt, Digging, Dreams, and Drama: Why Presenting Proper Archaeology to the Public is Crucial for the Future of Our Field” We seem to have forgotten that previous generations of Near Eastern archaeologists knew full well the need to bring their work before the eyes of the general public; think especially of V. Gordon Childe, Sir Leonard Woolley, Gertrude Bell, James Henry Breasted, Yigael Yadin, Dame Kathleen Kenyon, and a whole host of others who lectured widely and wrote prolifically. Breasted even created a movie on the exploits of the Oriental Institute, which debuted at Carnegie Hall and then played around the country in the 1930s. The public was hungry for accurate information back then and is still hungry for it today. And yet, with a few exceptions, we have lost sight of this, sacrificed to the goal of achieving tenure and other perceived institutional norms, and have left it to others to tell our stories for us, not always to our satisfaction. I believe that it is time for us all— not just a few, but as many as possible—to once again begin telling our own stories about our findings and presenting our archaeological work in ways that make it relevant, interesting, and engaging to a broader audience. We need to deliver our findings and our thoughts about the ancient world in a way that will not only attract but excite our audiences. Our livelihoods, and the future of the field, depend upon it, for this is true not only for our lectures and writings for the general public but also in our classrooms.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tentative List World Heritage Sites of the State of Israel
    The Tentative List and World Heritage Sites of the State of Israel The inscribed World Heritage Sites and Tentative List of properties for inscription to the World Heritage List according to Article 11 of the Convention for the Protection of World Cultural and Natural Heritage and the Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention. July 2000 Updated July 2010 The Working Committee: Prof. Michael Turner, Chair, Bezalel Academy of Arts and Design, Jerusalem Dr. Eliezer Frankenberg, Israel Nature and Parks Authority Eng. Yaacov Schaffer, Israel Antiquities Authority Prepared by: Prof. Michael Turner Coordinator: Daniel Bar-Elli, Secretary General, Israel National Commission for UNESCO Published by: Publication Dept., Ministry of Education 3nd edition 2011 Front page: mosaic in the Villa of Dionysus, Sepphoris Introduction Israel ratified the Convention for the Protection of This submission represents five parts; the proposals for World Cultural and Natural Heritage, 1972 on 6 the Tentative List and Inscribed sites: January 2000, then joining the 157 countries already party to the convention. Today, there are 187 countries A. Tentative List in Israel; signed on the convention, attesting to its universality those sites exclusively in Israel listed geographically with 936 inscribed sites in 151 countries (183 Natural, from north to south; 725 Cultural and 28 Mixed sites). B. Tentative List for Trans-National Sites; The Israel National Commission for UNESCO those sites within the boundaries in Israel but shared established a Public Committee to consider the with neighbouring countries; potential sites to be proposed by Israel to the World Heritage Committee according to the approved C.
    [Show full text]
  • Combating Desertification: Evolving Perceptions and Strategies 106 Alon Tal 6
    Between Ruin and RestoR ation HISTORY OF THE URBAN ENVIRONMENT Martin V. Melosi and Joel A. Tarr, Editors Between Ruin and RestoRation an enviRonmental HistoRy of isRael edited by daniel e. orenstein, alon tal, and Char miller univeRsity of Pitts BuRgH PRess Published by the University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, Pa., 15260 Copyright © 2012, University of Pittsburgh Press All rights reserved Manufactured in the United States of America Printed on acid-free paper 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 <CIP DATA SHEET TO COME> Dedicated to Azariah Alon and Amotz Zahavi and the late Yosef Tamir: Among Israel’s first environmental leaders, who saw that the road ahead could lead to ruin . or restoration. Contents Acknowledgments 000 Introduction 000 1. The Environment in Palestine in the Late Ottoman Period, 1798–1918 1 Ruth Kark and Noam Levin 2. The Environmental Legacy of the Fellaheen and the Bedouin in Palestine 29 No’am G. Seligman 3. Human Impact on Wildlife in Israel since the Nineteenth Century 53 Yoram Yom-Tov 4. Zionist and Israeli Perspectives on Population Growth and Environmental Impact in Palestine and Israel 82 Daniel E. Orenstein 5. Combating Desertification: Evolving Perceptions and Strategies 106 Alon Tal 6. The Agricultural Roots of Israel’s Water Crisis 129 Hillel Shuval 7. Open Space in an Urban Society 146 Iris Han 8. The Battle of the “True Believers”: Environmentalism in Israeli Party Politics 168 Orr Karrasin vii viii contents 9. Minority Report: Environmental Challenges Facing the Arab Society in Israel 190 Hussein Tarabeih 10. A Prolonged Recessional: The Continuing Influence of British Rule on Israeli Environmental Law 209 David Schorr 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera: Braconidae) 4
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Entomofauna Jahr/Year: 2015 Band/Volume: 0036 Autor(en)/Author(s): Papp Jenö Artikel/Article: A contribution to the braconid fauna of Israel (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) 4. Braconinae 1-32 © Entomofauna Ansfelden/Austria; download unter www.zobodat.at Entomofauna ZEITSCHRIFT FÜR ENTOMOLOGIE Band 36, Heft 1: 1-32 ISSN 0250-4413 Ansfelden, 2. Januar 2015 A contribution to the braconid fauna of Israel (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) 4. Braconinae J. PAPP Abstract Ninety-seven Braconinae species are reported from Israel belonging to 13 genera. The material was collected by 60 naturalists during the last five decades. Forty-six species proved to be new to the fauna of Israel. Three species are new to the science: they are described under the names Bracon (Lucobracon) freidbergi, Bracon (Bracon) furthi and Bracon (Bracon) israelicus, and are related to their nearest allies. Holotypes are deposited in the Tel Aviv University, one paratype in the Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest. In the List of the Species the faunistic novelties are disclosed, the entities cover the following data: species name, number of specimens, locality, ecological observation, collecting time, collector. With 64 line-drawn figures. Key words: Generic names, new species, description, nearest allies, faunistic novelties, depository. Introduction Ninety-seven braconine species are reported taken in Israel. The species divide in among 13 genera (in brackets the respective species-number): Aphrastobracon ASHMEAD, 1896 1 © Entomofauna Ansfelden/Austria; download unter www.zobodat.at (1), Atanycolus FÖRSTER, 1862 (1), Brayproctus ASHMEAD, 1900 (2), Bracon FABRICIUS, 1798 (57), Curriea ASHMEAD, 1900 (1), Glyptomorpha HOLMGREN, 1868 (4), Habrobracon ASHMEAD, 1895 (5), Iphiaulax FOERSTER, 1862 (8), Pseudovipio SZÉPLIGETI, 1896 (7), Rhadinobracon SZÉPLIGETI, 1906 (1), Soter SUSSURE, 1892 (1), Teraturus KOKUJEV, 1898 (1) and Vipio LATREILLE, 1804 (8).
    [Show full text]
  • Tourism 2018
    מדינת ישראל STATE OF ISRAEL TOURISM 2018 PUBLICATION No. 1781 www.cbs.gov.il Jerusalem, December 2019 Copyright © 2019 The State of Israel ISSN 0333-6204 PREFACE This publication summarizes data on tourism in Israel in 2018, which were processed at the Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS) and by other bodies. Some of the data were previously published in CBS periodicals, and other data are presented here for the first time. The publication is the result of a joint effort by the CBS and the Ministry of Tourism, which finances the surveys on accommodation services as well as the production of this publication. Dr. Yaron Ergas, Director of Research, Statistics, and Knowledge Management at the Ministry of Tourism, assisted in this effort. The CBS wishes to thank all those who assisted in providing data regularly, which enabled us to assemble and process the data presented here: the Israel Police, which provided the material that served as a basis for data concerning the movements of tourists and Israelis at Israel’s borders; the Israel Hotel Association; and all hotels and places of accommodation, which supplied data on accommodation services; the Society for the Protection of Nature in Israel, which supplied data on youth hostels in field schools; and the Youth Hostels Association and the Israel Nature and Parks Authority. Special thanks are extended to rural tourism operators. Avigail Levi Senior Department Director Economic-Business Statistics Jerusalem, 2019 ( 3 ) Staff of the Central Bureau of Statistics who Participated in the Preparation
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Rainfall Report
    STATE OF ISRAEL DATE: 19/09/2021 MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT TIME: 09:49 METEOROLOGICAL SERVICE − CLIMATOLOGICAL DEPARTMENT PAGE: 1 PRELIMINARY DAILY RAINFALL REPORT − 14/09/2021 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−− I I DAILY I ACCUMULATIVE FROM AUGUST I ANNUAL I I I RAINFALL I−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−I AVERAGE I I I (TENTH MM) I (TENTH I % OF SAME I % OF ANNUAL I I I I I MM) I PERIOD AVERAGE I AVERAGE I (MM) I −−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−− −−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−− COASTAL AREA −−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−− I ROSH HANIQRA I 0 I 0 I I I 590 I 110021 I LIMAN ZAHAL I 0 I DROP I I I I 110200 I SAAR I 0 I 0 I I I 583 I 110351 I NAHARIYYA I 0 I DROP I I I I 110390 I SHAVE ZIYYON I 0 I 0 I I I I 110521 I AFEQ I 0 I 1 I I I I 111145 I HAIFA REFINERIES I 0 I 2 I I I I 111510 I HAIFA PORT MAN I 0 I 0 I I I 539 I 120202 I HAIFA TECHNION I 0 I 0 I I I I 120530 I HAY BAR KARMEL I 0 I 0 I I I I 120570 I HAIFA UNIVERSITY I 0 I 0 I I I 685 I 120629 I YAGUR I 0 I 0 I I I 705 I 120750 I PARK HA KARMEL I 0 I 0 I I I I 120770 I EN KARMEL MAN I 0 I 0 I I I I 121051 I EN KARMEL I 0 I 0 I I I 584 I 121056 I SHEMURAT NAHAL MEAROT I 0 I 0 I I I I 121110 I EN HASHOFET MAN I 0 I 0 I I I 665 I 121540 I EN HASHOFET I 0 I 0 I I I I 121541 I ZIKHRON YAAQOV I 0 I 0 I I I I 121702 I AMMIQAM I 0 I DROP I I I 625 I 121801 I GALED MAN I 0 I 0 I I I 649 I 121851 I GALED I 0 I 0 I I I I 121852 I NAHAL TANINIM I 0 I 1 I I I I 121870 I HADERA PORT I
    [Show full text]
  • Israel Water Context 1. Abstract
    Israel Water Context 1. Abstract – Introduction Israel is a modern state that has a developed, efficient and reliable water economy. The water management of the state is based mainly on rains falling during the winter in the northern half of the country where a Mediterranean Sea climate prevails. The rainwater fills Lake Kinneret, which is in the north of Israel, and the groundwater reservoirs in the center of the country. Against this, in the southern half of the country a dry desert climate prevails as a result of Israel's location bordering the world desert belt. The water required throughout the country for drinking and for agriculture is transported through various water projects from the more rainy north to the arid southern part. The three large water sources are the mountain aquifer, the coastal aquifer and Lake Kinneret. Small aquifers and exploitation of surface water constitute other sources. With the increase in the consumption of water and the exhausting of the natural water potential, other sources have been developed in Israel – desalination and purification of sewage waters. 2. Geographic Background The Country Israel is located in the southeastern basin of the Mediterranean Sea, between the Mediterranean Sea (in the west), Egypt (in the southwest), Jordan and Syria (in the east) and Lebanon (in the north). (click here to see map). It comprises an area of 28,000 km2 (of which around 6000 km2 is in Judea and Samaria), extending over a long and narrow strip. Its length from north to south is around 430 km; its average width in the northern and central part ranges between -70 and -100 km and in its southern half it narrows down to its southernmost point, at Elat.
    [Show full text]
  • ASOR Annual Meeting
    November 15–18 | Boston, Massachusetts Welcome to ASOR’s 2017 Annual Meeting 2–6 History of ASOR 7 Program-at-a-Glance 12–15 Members’ Meeting Agenda 15 Business Meetings and Special Events 16–17 Academic Program 20–52 Projects on Parade Poster Session 52–53 Contents Digital Archaeology Demo Showcase Posters 54–55 of 2017 Sponsors and Exhibitors 56–61 2016 Honors and Awards 65 Looking Ahead to the 2018 Annual Meeting 66 Honorific and Memorial Gifts 67 Fiscal Year 2017 Honor Roll 68–69 Table Table ASOR’s Legacy Circle 70 2017 ACOR Jordanian Travel Scholarship Recipients 70 2017 Fellowship Recipients 71 ASOR Board of Trustees 72 ASOR Committees 73–75 Institutional Members 76 Overseas Centers 77 ASOR Staff 78 BASOR Recommendation Form 79 Paper Abstracts 82–187 Projects on Parade Poster Abstracts 188–194 Digital Archaeology Demo Showcase Poster Abstracts 195–201 Index of Sessions 202–204 Index of Presenters 205–211 Wifi Information 212 Hotel Information and Floor Plans 213–215 Meeting Highlights 216 Cover photo by Selma Omerefendic ISBN 978-0-89757-107-4 ASOR PROGRAM GUIDE 2017 | 1 American Schools of Oriental Research | 2017 Annual Meeting Welcome from ASOR President, Susan Ackerman Welcome to ASOR’s 2017 Annual Meeting, which promises to be ASOR’s biggest ever. Already back in February, we received a record number of paper proposals, and the Programs Committee has worked overtime to put the best of these proposals together into the richest and fullest set of sessions we have ever been able to offer—covering all the major regions of the Near East and wider Mediterranean from earliest times through the Islamic period.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel in Perspective Geography Introduction Israel, a Small Country in the Middle East, Is Slightly Larger Than New Jersey
    COUNTRY IN PERSPECTIVE ISRAEL View of Tel Aviv Flickr / José Ángel Morente Valero DLIFLC DEFENSE LANGUAGE INSTITUTE FOREIGN LANGUAGE CENTER COUNTRY IN PERSPECTIVE | ISRAEL TABLE OF CONTENT Geography Introduction ................................................................................................................... 6 Geographic Divisions .................................................................................................. 7 Mediterranean Coastal Plain .............................................................................7 Central and Northern Highlands .......................................................................7 Jordan River Valley .............................................................................................8 Negev Desert .......................................................................................................8 Topographic Features ................................................................................................. 9 Climate ..........................................................................................................................10 Rivers and Bodies of Water ......................................................................................10 Jordan River .......................................................................................................10 Sea of Galilee (Lake Kinneret) ........................................................................ 11 Dead Sea (Yam HaMelach) .............................................................................12
    [Show full text]