DOCSLIB.ORG

The Tories Are Failing Tameside

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Thanks to the Tories, a one-earner family with children will ************** lose £534 a year. the price of tory failUre ************** THE TORIES food prices: > > > Up > ARE FAILING petrol prices: > > > Up > TAMESIDE energy bills: > > > U > Families in Tameside are feeling the p squeeze. But Instead of taking action train fares: to create jobs and growth or reduce > > > Up > the rising cost of living, the Tory-led vat: government is making matters worse. > > > Up Their unfair benefit cuts and VAT > rises will hit the pockets of working families, at the same time as giving 8,000 millionaires a tax cut of £107,000 each. Tory cuts are Cllr Kieran Quinn hurting our Labour leader of communities. Tameside Council The Tory-led government’s unfair cuts to local councils have hit Northern areas like But Labour is Tameside much harder than the South. Time and again we see preferential treatment standing up given to areas that need the least support, while councils for Tameside. like Tameside are forced to make huge cuts. The Tories’ too-far, too-fast Investing in infrastructure cuts mean £39m of cuts to and the local economy local services in Tameside over to create new jobs and the next two years. This is in apprenticeships for local addition to the £58m already people slashed from Tameside’s budget in the last two years. Supporting local employers The harsh terms imposed by to pay sta! a Living Wage the government have already meant that Tameside Council of at least £7.20 an hour, has had to make a lot of tough starting with Tameside decisions about it’s services. Council The latest financial settlement will mean even more tough Tackling legal loan sharks decisions in future years. that charge borrowers But despite this, I am more than 4,000% confident that we can still do interest on ‘short term’ the things that local people loans expect. Instead of cowering beneath the Tory axe, we will Reducing energy costs by stand shoulder to shoulder with bulk-buying energy for residents and local businesses, local residents, helping to protect the services you rely squeezed families keep on and the communities that their bills down we represent. Working hard for Denton The A57 Manchester Road corridor into Denton has been the focus of concern for the Denton North East Councillors. One of the businesses along this road has constructed a breeze block wall on the boundary, but left a potential antisocial behaviour magnet. Councillor Ricci says “we are pressing the council to take enforcement action to ensure this wall is rendered, and improve the look of this wall, whilst minimising the potential for gra!ti”. Residents around Jet Amber Fields have been concerned by the signs recently erected by Greater Manchester Waste who owned this open land banning horses. Following enquiries by Councillors Ricci, Gwynne and Ward, and a site meeting, Greater Manchester Waste agreed that horses were allowed to use this land. Jet Amber Fields have recently been sold and the Labour team are meeting with the new owners, Landcare Group, to ensure that residents are able to continue to enjoy this valued piece of open space. With energy prices soaring, Labour is save up to taking action to help people lower their gas and electricity bills. Tameside’s Labour-led council has £250 partnered up with authorities across on gas and Greater Manchester for The Collective Energy Switch. electricity The first energy auction has already saved bills 35,000 people in Greater Manchester an average of £122 a year. You can sign up to be part of the next auction at GMFairEnergy.com, with no obligation. The more people you encourage to sign up, the better deal we can get for everyone. End legal loan sharking Labour are leading the campaign in Tameside against unfair payday lenders that charge up to 4,200% interest. The UK’s poorest borrowers pay the highest price for credit in Europe. We can change that. Labour councillors in Tameside are fighting more and more families are turning to payday to stop payday lenders, or ‘legal loan lenders to get them through the month. Labour sharks’, ripping o! consumers. wants to protect families from being ripped o" Labour successfully passed a Council by the legal loan sharks online and on our high motion in December to support calls for a streets. cap on interest rates. Lenders like like Wonga There are far cheaper options than charge borrowers rates of more than 4,200% payday lenders, if you need a loan. Go to interest on loans. findyourcreditunion.co.uk to learn more. With living costs rising faster than wages, New lease of life for Denton Denton’s Labour councillors are working together with local residents and businesses to make Denton a better place to shop, work and live. Denton’s Town Team is a collaboration between Tameside Council, your local Labour MP and councillors, Denton businesses, traders and residents. The Team is working together to develop ideas, opinions and initiatives all Denton Labour councillors are working to revitalise the town centre in this di !cult with local residents and businesses to find economic climate, whether it be temporary ways to revitalise Denton town centre. markets, charity collections or town picnics. There’s lots to come so watch this space! your local get in touch Labour team We want to hear from you. Tell us how you would like to see your area improved. Your comments: Cllr Vincent Ricci t: 0161 223 0395 e: [email protected] Name Address line 1 Postcode Phone Cllr Allison Gwynne Email t: 0161 336 9331 e: [email protected] Which party would you Labour vote for if there was an Conservatives election tomorrow? Other Would you like to receive Andrew Gwynne’s email newsletter about what’s Yes going on in your area? Would you like to join the Yes Cllr Denise Ward Labour Party? t: 0161 336 6121 e: [email protected] Post to: FREEPOST RLUR-CKAG-XECB Tameside Labour Manchester M34 5ZT The Tories are failing. We need real change to rebuild Britain. Andrew Gwynne MP Labour MP for Denton and Reddish 0161 320 1504 [email protected] andrewgwynne.co.uk Government cuts in ‘right thing’ but who rely on Tameside mean we are extra help, such as council losing £110 for every tax relief, housing benefit A one-earner couple man, woman and child. and tax credits to help with children will be But is all this financial make that work pay. And pain working? these are the people who Well not according to will be hit the hardest. the independent O!ce of At the same time, the £534 Budget Responsibility who government has chosen to worse o! each year, admit that the government gift a £2,000 a week tax thanks to the Tories will now be forced to cut to Britain’s millionaires. borrow £212 billion more So much for us all being in than planned, partly this together! because their policies are I will continue to do all pushing ever more people I can in 2013 to oppose onto benefits. many of these measures 70% So the government’s and do my upmost to of those hit by Tory answer has been to cut ensure Ministers hear the benefit cuts are benefits to the most needy voice of Tameside people working families in a savage and mean way. loudly and clearly on these Three quarters of their unfair policies that are changes a"ect people in hitting our communities so low paid work – doing the very hard. Printed by Greatledge Printers, Malaga House, Pink Bank Lane, Manchester M12 5GH. Promoted by Dan Hogan on behalf of Tameside Labour Party, all at 161 Droylsnden Road, Audenshaw, Manchester, M34 5ZT..
Recommended publications
  • Tameside Housing Need Assessment (HNA) (2017) Provides the Latest Available Evidence to Help to Shape the Future Planning and Housing Policies of the Area

    Tameside Housing Need Assessment (HNA) (2017) Provides the Latest Available Evidence to Help to Shape the Future Planning and Housing Policies of the Area

    Tameside Housing Need Assessment (HNA) 2017 Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council Final Report December 2017 Main Contact: Michael Bullock Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0800 612 9133 Website: www.arc4.co.uk © 2017 arc4 Limited (Company No. 06205180) Tameside HNA 2017 Page | 2 Table of contents Executive summary ......................................................................................................................... 8 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 8 The Housing Market Area (HMA) ........................................................................................ 8 The current housing market ................................................................................................ 9 Understanding the future housing market ....................................................................... 11 The need for all types of housing ...................................................................................... 11 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................... 14 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 15 Background and objectives ............................................................................................... 15 National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) and other requirements
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Scrutiny Co-Ordinating Board, 13/10

    (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Scrutiny Co-Ordinating Board, 13/10

    Date: 5 October 2016 Please note the earlier start time Town Hall, Penrith, Cumbria CA11 7QF Tel: 01768 817817 Email: [email protected] Dear Sir/Madam Special Scrutiny Co-ordinating Board Agenda - 13 October 2016 Notice is hereby given that a special meeting of the Scrutiny Co-ordinating Board will be held at 6.00 pm on Thursday, 13 October 2016 at the Council Chamber, Town Hall, Penrith. 1 Apologies for Absence 2 Declarations of Interest To receive declarations of the existence and nature of any private interests, both disclosable pecuniary and any other registrable interests, in any matter to be considered or being considered. 3 2018 Review of Parliamentary Constituencies (Pages 3 - 48) To consider report G30/16 of the Deputy Chief Executive which is attached and which is to inform Members of the proposals of the Boundary Commission for England in relation to the 2018 Review of Parliamentary Constituencies and how they will affect Cumbria and Eden in particular, and to determine a means to enable the Council’s response to the consultation on them. RECOMMENDATION: That Members comment upon the proposals of the Boundary Commission with a view to recommending a response to Council. 4 Any Other Items which the Chairman decides are urgent 5 Date of Next Scheduled Meeting Yours faithfully M Neal Deputy Chief Executive (Monitoring Officer) Matthew Neal www.eden.gov.uk Deputy Chief Executive Democratic Services Contact: L Rushen Please Note: Access to the internet in the Council Chamber and Committee room is available via the guest wi-fi
  • Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Tameside

    Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Tameside

    Final recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Tameside Report to The Electoral Commission August 2003 © Crown Copyright 2003 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by The Electoral Commission with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. Report no. 349 2 Contents Page What is The Boundary Committee For England? 5 Summary 7 1 Introduction 11 2 Current electoral arrangements 13 3 Draft recommendations 17 4 Responses to consultation 19 5 Analysis and final recommendations 21 6 What happens next? 33 Appendices A Final recommendations for Tameside: Detailed mapping 35 B Guide to interpreting the first draft of the electoral change Order 37 C First draft of electoral change Order for Tameside 39 3 4 What is The Boundary Committee for England? The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of The Electoral Commission, an independent body set up by Parliament under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. The functions of the Local Government Commission for England (LGCE) were transferred to The Electoral Commission and its Boundary Committee on 1 April 2002 by the Local Government Commission for England (Transfer of Functions) Order 2001 (SI 2001 No. 3692). The Order also transferred to The Electoral Commission the functions of the Secretary of State in relation to taking decisions on recommendations for changes to local authority electoral arrangements and implementing them.

  • Revised Proposals for New Constituency Boundaries in the North West Contents

    Appendix 2 Revised proposals for new constituency boundaries in the North West Contents Summary 3 1 What is the Boundary Commission for England? 5 2 Background to the 2018 Review 7 3 Revised proposals for the North West 11 The sub-region split 11 Cumbria 12 Lancashire 15 Merseyside (less the Wirral) 31 Greater Manchester, Wirral, and Cheshire 33 4 How to have your say 51 Annex A: Revised proposals for constituencies, 53 including wards and electorates Revised proposals for new constituency boundaries in the North West 1 Summary Who we are and what we do out our analysis of all the responses to our initial proposals in the first and second The Boundary Commission for England consultations, and the conclusions we is an independent and impartial have reached as to how those proposals non-departmental public body, which is should be revised as a result. The annex responsible for reviewing Parliamentary to each report contains details of the constituency boundaries in England. composition of each constituency in our revised proposals for the relevant region; The 2018 Review maps to illustrate these constituencies can be viewed on our website or in hard copy We have the task of periodically reviewing at a local place of deposit near you. the boundaries of all the Parliamentary constituencies in England. We are currently What are the revised proposals conducting a review on the basis of new for the North West? rules laid down by Parliament. These rules involve a significant reduction in the We have revised the composition of number of constituencies in England (from 25 of the 68 constituencies we proposed 533 to 501), resulting in the number of in September 2016.
  • Local Elections Handbook 2008Complete

    Local Elections Handbook 2008Complete

    LOCAL ELECTIONS HANDBOOK 2008 Colin Rallings & Michael Thrasher LOCAL ELECTIONS HANDBOOK 2008 The 2008 Local Election Results Colin Rallings and Michael Thrasher with the assistance of Galina Borisyuk, Brian Cheal, Dawn Cole, Elena Long and Lawrence Ware Local Government Chronicle Elections Centre University of Plymouth Local Elections Handbook 2008 © Colin Rallings and Michael Thrasher 2008 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior permission of the publishers. Published by the Local Government Chronicle Elections Centre, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA ISBN 978-0-948858-43-7 Distributed by: LGC Information, Greater London House, Hampstead Road, London, NW1 7EJ Table of Contents Acknowledgements .......................................................................................... v Introduction ..................................................................................................... vii Using the Handbook .......................................................................................xix Aggregate Statistics for Local Authorities ......................................................... 1 London Mayor and Assembly Election Results .............................................. 11 Metropolitan Borough Council Election Results ............................................. 29 Unitary Council Election Results ...................................................................
  • Local Election Results 2008

    Local Election Results 2008

    Local Election Results May 2008 Andrew Teale August 15, 2016 2 LOCAL ELECTION RESULTS 2008 Typeset by LATEX Compilation and design © Andrew Teale, 2012. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled “GNU Free Documentation License”. This file, together with its LATEX source code, is available for download from http://www.andrewteale.me.uk/leap/ Please advise the author of any corrections which need to be made by email: [email protected] Contents Introduction and Abbreviations9 I Greater London Authority 11 1 Mayor of London 12 2 Greater London Assembly Constituency Results 13 3 Greater London Assembly List Results 16 II Metropolitan Boroughs 19 4 Greater Manchester 20 4.1 Bolton.................................. 20 4.2 Bury.................................... 21 4.3 Manchester............................... 23 4.4 Oldham................................. 25 4.5 Rochdale................................ 27 4.6 Salford................................. 28 4.7 Stockport................................ 29 4.8 Tameside................................. 31 4.9 Trafford................................. 32 4.10 Wigan.................................. 34 5 Merseyside 36 5.1 Knowsley................................ 36 5.2 Liverpool................................ 37 5.3 Sefton.................................. 39 5.4 St Helens................................. 41 5.5 Wirral.................................. 43 6 South Yorkshire 45 6.1 Barnsley................................ 45 6.2 Doncaster............................... 47 6.3 Rotherham............................... 48 6.4 Sheffield................................ 50 3 4 LOCAL ELECTION RESULTS 2008 7 Tyne and Wear 53 7.1 Gateshead............................... 53 7.2 Newcastle upon Tyne........................
  • Final Recommendations - North West Region

    Final Recommendations - North West Region

    Final recommendations - North West region Contents 1. Initial/revised proposals overview p1 6. Sub-region 1: Cumbria p11, recommendations p12 2. Number of representations received p3 7. Sub-region 2: Lancashire p13, recommendations p18 3. Campaigns p5 8. Sub-region 3: Merseyside p20, recommendations p21 4. Major issues p6 9. Sub-region 4: Greater Manchester, the Wirral and Cheshire Greater Manchester p21, recommendations p27 the Wirral p30, recommendations p31 Cheshire p31, recommendations p33 5. Final recommendations p8 Appendix A Initial/revised proposals overview 1. The North West region was allocated 68 constituencies under the initial and revised proposals, a reduction of seven from the existing allocation. In formulating the initial and revised proposals the Commission decided to construct constituencies using the following sub-regions: Table 1A - Constituency allocation Sub-region Existing allocation Allocation under initial Allocation under revised proposals proposals Cumbria 6 5 5 Lancashire 16 14 14 Merseyside (less the 11 10 10 Wirral) Greater Manchester, the 42 39 39 Wirral and Cheshire 2. Under the initial proposals 14 of the existing 75 constituencies were unchanged. The revised proposals retained 13 of the existing constituencies unchanged, (a reduction of one). The theoretical entitlement of 25.37 constituencies in Greater Manchester and 10.34 constituencies in Cheshire meant that both counties had to contain constituencies that crossed their respective county boundaries. Under both sets of proposals it was proposed to have two constituencies ​ that crossed county boundaries. We decided not to propose constituencies that crossed the Greater Manchester ​ boundary in the north with Lancashire. The reasons for this are that there was no requirement for Lancashire to have a 1 constituency that crosses the county boundary with Greater Manchester and, even if this crossing had been proposed it still would be necessary to construct a cross-county constituency between Cheshire and Greater Manchester in the south.
  • Local Election Results 2007

    Local Election Results 2007

    Local Election Results May 2007 Andrew Teale August 12, 2017 2 LOCAL ELECTION RESULTS 2007 Typeset by LATEX Compilation and design © Andrew Teale, 2011. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled “GNU Free Documentation License”. This file is available for download from http://www.andrewteale.me.uk/ The LATEX source code is available for download at http://www.andrewteale.me.uk/pdf/2007-source.zip Please advise the author of any corrections which need to be made by email: [email protected] Change Log 12th August 2017: Correction to Market ward, Cambridge (thanks to Colin Rosentiel). 1st August 2015: Gain information added for Walsall. 14th April 2015: The seat won by Gwenda Thomas in the Welsh Assembly was Neath, not Gower. 1st April 2015: Blandford Old Town ward, North Dorset was LD gain from C. 22nd March 2015: Chadsmead ward, Lichfield was 1 LD gain from Lab, not 1 LD gain from C. 15th March 2015: Dorchester East ward, West Dorset was 2 LD holds; Dor- chester North ward, West Dorset was 1 LD gain from Ind. 13th March 2015: Winstanley ward, Blaby was 1 C gain from Lab; Calverton ward, Gedling was 2 Calverton First Independents gain from Lab.. 1st March 2015: Consolidated results for Taunton Deane corrected.
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No.220 LOCAL GOVERNMENT

    Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No.220 LOCAL GOVERNMENT

    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No.220 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REPORT NO. 220. LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Sir Edmund Compton GCB,KBE DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J M Rankin QC MEMBERS Lady Bowden Mr J T Brockbank Professor Michael Chisholm Mr R R Thornton CB DL Sir Andrew Wheatley CBE To the Rt Hon Merlyn Rees, MP Secretary of State for the Home Department PROPOSALS FOR REVISED ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE METROPOLITAN BOROUGH OF TAMESIDE 1. We, the Local Government Boundary Commission for England, having carried out our initial review of the electoral arrange- ments for the metropolitan borough of Tameside in accordance with the requirements of section 63 of, and Schedule 9 to, the Local Government Act 1972, present our proposals for the future electoral arrangements for that borough. 2. In accordance with the procedure laid down in section 60(1) and (2) of the 1972 Act, notice was given on 28 August 1975 that we were to undertake this review. This was incorporated in a consultation letter addressed to the Tameside Borough Council, copies of which were circulated to Greater Manchester County Council, the Members of Parliament for the constituencies concerned arid the headquarters of the main.political parties. Copies were also sent to the editors of local newspapers circulating in the area and of the local government press. Notices inserted in the local press announced the start of the review and invited comments from members of the public and from any interested bodies. 3. Tameside Borough Council were invited to prepare a draft scheme of representation for our consideration.
  • Draft Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Tameside

    Draft Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Tameside

    Draft recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Tameside February 2003 © Crown Copyright 2003 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by The Electoral Commission with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. 2 Contents Page What is The Boundary Committee for England? 5 Summary 7 1 Introduction 11 2 Current electoral arrangements 13 3 Submissions received 17 4 Analysis and draft recommendations 19 5 What happens next? 29 Appendices A Draft recommendations for Tameside: Detailed mapping 31 B Code of practice on written consultation 33 3 4 What is The Boundary Committee for England? The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of The Electoral Commission, an independent body set up by Parliament under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. The functions of the Local Government Commission for England were transferred to The Electoral Commission and its Boundary Committee on 1 April 2002 by the Local Government Commission for England (Transfer of Functions) Order 2001 (SI 2001 No. 3692). The Order also transferred to The Electoral Commission the functions of the Secretary of State in relation to taking decisions on recommendations for changes to local authority electoral arrangements and implementing them. Members of the Committee are: Pamela Gordon (Chair) Professor Michael Clarke CBE Robin Gray Joan Jones Ann M Kelly Professor Colin Mellors Archie Gall (Director) We are required by law to review the electoral arrangements of every principal local authority in England.
  • FINAL BC Manchester

    FINAL BC Manchester

    BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND PROCEEDINGS AT THE 2018 REVIEW OF PARLIAMENTARY CONSTITUENCIES IN ENGLAND HELD AT THE MIDLAND HOTEL, MANCHESTER ON TUESDAY 11 OCTOBER 2016 DAY ONE Before: Mr Neil Ward, The Lead Assistant Commissioner ______________________________ Transcribed from audio by W B Gurney & Sons LLP 83 Victoria Street, London, SW1H 0HW Telephone Number: 0203 585 4721/2 ______________________________ At 10.00 am: THE LEAD ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER: Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to this, the first public hearing on the Boundary Commission for England’s initial proposals for new parliamentary constituency boundaries in the North West region. My name is Neil Ward and I am an Assistant Commissioner of the Boundary Commission. I was appointed by the Commission to assist them in the task of making recommendations for new constituencies in the region. I am responsible for chairing the hearing today and tomorrow and I am also responsible, with my fellow Assistant Commissioners, Nicholas Elliott and Graham Clark, who are both here today, for analysing all the representations received about the initial proposals for the region and then presenting recommendations to the Commission as to whether or not those initial proposals should be revised. I should state at the outset that the Assistant Commissioners have had no hand in the drafting of the initial proposals. I am assisted here by members of the Commission staff, led by Sam Hartley, the Secretary to the Commission, who is sitting beside me. Mr Hartley will shortly provide an explanation of the Commission’s initial proposals. He will also tell you how you can make written representations and he will deal with one or two administrative matters.
  • Initial Proposals for New Parliamentary Constituency Boundaries in the North West Region

    Initial Proposals for New Parliamentary Constituency Boundaries in the North West Region

    Initial proposals for new Parliamentary constituency boundaries in the North West region June 2021 Contents Summary 2 Who we are and what we do 2 The 2023 Review 2 Initial proposals 2 What is changing in the North West region? 2 How to have your say 3 1 What is the Boundary Commission for England? 4 2 Background to the 2023 Review 5 The rules in the legislation 6 Timetable for our review 7 Stage one – development of initial proposals 7 Stage two – consultation on initial proposals 8 Stage three – consultation on representations received 8 Stage four – development and publication of revised proposals 9 Stage five – development and publication of the final report and recommendations 9 3 Initial proposals for the North West region 10 Initial Proposals for the Cumbria and Lancashire sub-region 12 Initial Proposals for the Cheshire and Merseyside sub-region 17 Initial proposals in the Greater Manchester sub-region 21 4 How to have your say 25 How can you give us your views? 26 What do we want views on? 27 Appendix: Initial proposals for constituencies, including wards and electorates 28 Glossary 54 Initial proposals for new Parliamentary constituency boundaries in the North West region 1 Summary Who we are and what we do The Boundary Commission for England (BCE) is an independent and impartial non-departmental public body, which is responsible for reviewing Parliamentary constituency boundaries in England. The 2023 Review We have the task of periodically reviewing the boundaries of all the Parliamentary constituencies in England. We are currently conducting a review on the basis of legislative rules most recently updated by Parliament in 2020.