Agenda Template
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, 1996-2001
ICPSR 2683 Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, 1996-2001 Virginia Sapiro W. Philips Shively Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 4th ICPSR Version February 2004 Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research P.O. Box 1248 Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 www.icpsr.umich.edu Terms of Use Bibliographic Citation: Publications based on ICPSR data collections should acknowledge those sources by means of bibliographic citations. To ensure that such source attributions are captured for social science bibliographic utilities, citations must appear in footnotes or in the reference section of publications. The bibliographic citation for this data collection is: Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Secretariat. COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS, 1996-2001 [Computer file]. 4th ICPSR version. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies [producer], 2002. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2004. Request for Information on To provide funding agencies with essential information about use of Use of ICPSR Resources: archival resources and to facilitate the exchange of information about ICPSR participants' research activities, users of ICPSR data are requested to send to ICPSR bibliographic citations for each completed manuscript or thesis abstract. Visit the ICPSR Web site for more information on submitting citations. Data Disclaimer: The original collector of the data, ICPSR, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for uses of this collection or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses. Responsible Use In preparing data for public release, ICPSR performs a number of Statement: procedures to ensure that the identity of research subjects cannot be disclosed. Any intentional identification or disclosure of a person or establishment violates the assurances of confidentiality given to the providers of the information. -
Area Profile
A PROFILE OF NEEDS AND SERVICES ABOUT CHILDREN, YOUNG PEOPLE & THEIR FAMILIES IN THE DUKINFIELD, STALYBRIDGE & MOSSLEY AREAS OF TAMESIDE SEPTEMBER 2007 CONTENTS Page No Dukinfield,Stalybridge & Mossley: Profile of need and services Introduction 2 Contents 3 Part 1: Basic need data 6 Population 6 Index of Multiple Deprivation 7 Ward Profiles 9 Dukinfield profile 9 1: Population data 9 2:Household Composition 9 3:Housing 10 4:Health 10 5:Unemployment 11 6:Education 11 7:Occupation 12 Dukinfield/Stalybridge profile 13 1: Population data 13 2:Household Composition 13 3:Housing 14 4:Health 14 5:Unemployment 14 6:Education 15 7:Occupation 16 Stalybridge North Profile 16 1:Population data 16 2:Household Composition 17 3:Housing 17 4:Health 18 5:Unemployment 18 6:Education 19 7:Occupation 19 Stalybridge South profile 20 1:Population data 20 2:Household Composition 21 3:Housing 21 4:Health 22 5:Unemployment 22 6.Education 23 7:Occupation 24 Mossley profile 24 1:Population data 24 2:Household Composition 25 3:Housing 25 4:Health 26 5:Unmployment 26 6:Education 27 7:Occupation 27 Selected Comparison Tables 28 Teenage Pregnancy Trend 29 Regeneration Profile 30 Part 2: Service Profile 33 Introduction 33 Section 1: Universal Offices 33 School and childcare data 33 1:Nursery Education and childcare 33 2:Primary Schools 34 3:Secondary Schools 34 4:Children’s Centres 35 5:Extended School Services 36 6: Childcare provision:summary 36 A. Childminders 37 B. Day Nurseries 37 C. Playgroups/Preschools 37 D. Out of School Clubs 38 Section 2: Additional services -
Submission to the Boundary Commission for England 2013 Review North West Region Greater Manchester and Lancashire
Submission to the Boundary Commission for England 2013 Review North West Region Greater Manchester and Lancashire Andrew Teale December 4, 2011 Abstract This submission disagrees with and presents a counter-proposal to the Boundary Commission for England’s proposals for new parliamentary con- stituency boundaries in Greater Manchester and Lancashire. The counter- proposal allocates seven whole constituencies to the boroughs of Stockport, Tameside and Oldham, nine whole constituencies to the boroughs of Man- chester, Salford and Trafford, and twenty-four whole constituencies to the rest of the region. No comment is made on the Boundary Commission’s proposals for the rest of the North West region or for any other region. Contents 1 Introduction2 1.1 The statutory criteria.........................2 1.2 Splitting of wards...........................3 2 Theoretical entitlements4 3 Southern Greater Manchester5 3.1 Manchester, Salford and Trafford..................5 3.2 Oldham, Stockport and Tameside.................. 10 4 Lancashire and Northern Greater Manchester 14 4.1 Crossing the boundary between Greater Manchester and Lancashire 16 4.2 Rochdale................................ 17 4.3 Bolton, Bury, Wigan and Rossendale................ 18 4.4 South Lancashire........................... 22 4.5 East Lancashire............................ 23 4.6 North Lancashire........................... 24 4.7 Summary................................ 25 5 Closing remarks 28 1 1 Introduction This document is my submission to the 2013 Review of Parliamentary constit- uency boundaries. I should first introduce myself. I am the editor and webmaster of the Lo- cal Elections Archive Project (http://www.andrewteale.me.uk/leap/), the in- ternet’s largest freely available collection of British local election results. I have been for some years a contributor to election-related web forums, and this submission is based on material originally posted on the Vote UK forum (http://www.vote-2007.co.uk/) and in some cases modified in the light of comments made. -
Boundary Review 2013 England Secondary Consultation
Boundary Review 2013 England Secondary Consultation Submission of the Labour Party Page 1 of 50 1) General Points a) Submission This submission is made on behalf of the Labour Party and the nine regional Labour parties within England. The submission represents the Labour’s Party’s response to the representations made to the Commission, both orally at the public hearings and in writing during the Initial Consultation Period and published by the Commission on 6 March 2012. The Labour Party made a detailed formal submission of its own which included a number of counter proposals. We have now considered the options further in each region, including those counter proposals submitted by others. We will refer to them in this response. While we are not formally amending our submission we will indicate those points and proposals with which we agree, and those with which we disagree. b) Factors to be considered In assessing the merits of different proposals we will as far as possible be guided by the stipulations of Clause 5 (1) of Schedule 2 to the Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Act 2011 which lays down the rules by which the Commission shall conduct the review. Under the terms of the Act1, the Commission may, in choosing between different schemes, take into account i) Special Geographical Circumstances, including the size shape and accessibility of a constituency ii) Local government boundaries iii) The boundaries of existing constituencies iv) Any local ties that would be broken by changes to constituencies 1 Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Act 2011, Schedule 2 Clause 5 (1). -
Area Profile
A profile of needs and s Services about children, young people and their families In the Hyde, Hattersley & Longdendale area of Tameside September 2007 Hyde, Hattersley & Longdendale: Profile of need and services Introduction This is a selective statistical profile of needs and services in the Hyde, Hattersley & Longdendale area, this is one of four areas chosen as a basis from which future integrated services for children, young people and their families will be delivered. The other areas are Ashton-under-Lyne: Denton, Droylsden & Audenshaw and Stalybridge, Mossley & Dukinfield. Companion profiles of these other areas are also available. This profile has a focus on data that has relevance to children and families rather than other community members (e.g. older people). The data selected is not exhaustive, rather key indicators of need are selected to help produce an overall picture of need in the area and offer some comparisons between localities (mainly wards) within the area. Some commentary is provided as appropriate. It is expected that the profile will aid the planning and delivery of services. The profile has two parts: Part 1 focuses on the presentation of basic need data, whilst Part 2 focuses on services. The top three categories of the new occupational classification are ‘Managers & Senior Officials; Professionals’ and Associate Professional & Technical’ (hatched at the top of the graph on right) Tameside as a whole comes 350 th out of 376 in the country for Professional; and bottom in Greater Manchester for all three categories -
Tameside Housing Need Assessment (HNA) (2017) Provides the Latest Available Evidence to Help to Shape the Future Planning and Housing Policies of the Area
Tameside Housing Need Assessment (HNA) 2017 Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council Final Report December 2017 Main Contact: Michael Bullock Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0800 612 9133 Website: www.arc4.co.uk © 2017 arc4 Limited (Company No. 06205180) Tameside HNA 2017 Page | 2 Table of contents Executive summary ......................................................................................................................... 8 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 8 The Housing Market Area (HMA) ........................................................................................ 8 The current housing market ................................................................................................ 9 Understanding the future housing market ....................................................................... 11 The need for all types of housing ...................................................................................... 11 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................... 14 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 15 Background and objectives ............................................................................................... 15 National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) and other requirements -
Elections 2008:Layout 1.Qxd
ELECTIONS REPORT Thursday 1 May 2008 PREPARED BY CST 020 8457 9999 www.thecst.org.uk Copyright © 2008 Community Security Trust Registered charity number 1042391 Executive Summary • Elections were held on 1st May 2008 for the • The other far right parties that stood in the Mayor of London and the London Assembly, elections are small and were mostly ineffective, 152 local authorities in England and all local although the National Front polled almost councils in Wales 35,000 votes across five London Assembly constituencies • The British National Party (BNP) won a seat on the London Assembly for the first time, polling • Respect – The Unity Coalition divided into two over 130,000 votes. The seat will be taken by new parties shortly before the elections: Richard Barnbrook, a BNP councillor in Barking Respect (George Galloway) and Left List & Dagenham. Barnbrook also stood for mayor, winning almost 200,000 first and second • Respect (George Galloway) stood in part of the preference votes London elections, polling well in East London but poorly elsewhere in the capital. They stood • The BNP stood 611 candidates in council nine candidates in council elections outside elections around England and Wales, winning London, winning one seat in Birmingham 13 seats but losing three that they were defending. This net gain of ten seats leaves • Left List, which is essentially the Socialist them holding 55 council seats, not including Workers Party (SWP) component of the old parish, town or community councils. These Respect party, stood in all parts of the -
Notice of Poll
NOTICE OF POLL Tameside Metropolitan Borough Election of a Borough Councillor for Droylsden East Notice is hereby given that: 1. A poll for the election of a Borough Councillor for Droylsden East will be held on Thursday 8 March 2018, between the hours of 7:00 am and 10:00 pm. 2. The number of Borough Councillors to be elected is one. 3. The names, home addresses and descriptions of the Candidates remaining validly nominated for election and the names of all persons signing the Candidates nomination paper are as follows: Names of Signatories Name of Candidate Home Address Description (if any) Proposers(+), Seconders(++) & Assentors BOYLE 29 Hiltons Farm Close, Labour Party Michael J Smith (+) Teresa A Smith (++) Laura Audenshaw, M34 5JP David J Mills Patricia Larkin Jane S Goodier David H Mitchell James Middleton Geoffrey Howarth Patrick Quinn Stuart Pearson OFFERMAN 23 Shire Croft, Mossley, Liberal Democrats Stephen Lightfoot (+) Claus Barthel (++) Shaun OL5 OAR Valerie Barthel John White Leslie Barlow Carol Oakes Andrew Downs Danielle Moore Lesley Betton Christine Drysdale STEVENSON 10 Saxon Street, The Conservative Party Hazel Stevenson (+) David Stevenson (++) Matt Droylsden, M43 7FR Candidate Joan Smith William R Smith Jennie L Davies Mark A Coyle Michael Sharp Carole Sharp Paul S Davies Steven Lewis TRAIN 34 Parvet Avenue, Green Party Barbara Ganson (+) Mark Jackson (++) Annie Droylsden, Manchester, Anthony J Torkington Gillian A Ingham M43 7SB Richard Ingham Maureen Street Gary Ward Elizabeth Ingham Peter Rothwell James F Brown -
Stalybridge North Ward, Which Comes Into Effect on 10Th June 2004
Census data used in this report are produced with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office and are © Crown Copyright Contents Residents Households Health P1 Age Structure of Population P4 Household Size P6 Limiting Long Term Illness Pensioner Households General Health P2 Ethnic Profile of Population Households with Children Carers Country of Birth Lone Parent Households P3 Religion Children in Households Work and Skills Marital Status with no Adult in Living Arrangements Employment P7 Economic Activity Unemployment P5 Tenure Vacant / Second Homes P8 Qualifications Property Size & Type Students Amenities Occupational Group Car Ownership N.B. This profile describes the new Stalybridge North ward, which comes into effect on 10th June 2004. The figures it contains must be regarded as provisional. The Office for National Statistics (ONS) has yet to issue official and more accurate Census figures for the new wards. Interpreting Census Statistics Please note that small figures in Census tables are liable to be amended by the ONS to preserve confidentiality. This means that totals and percentages which logically ought to be the same may in fact be different, depending what table they come from. Useful Websites Basic Census results can be found at www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk, but these refer to pre-June 2004 wards. See also www.statistics.gov.uk and www.tameside.gov.uk For further information please contact Anne Cunningham in the Policy Unit on 0161 342 2170, or email [email protected] All data taken from 2001 Census. Technical differences between the 1991 and 2001 Censuses make comparison difficult, and ward definitions have changed since 1991. -
(Public Pack)Agenda Document for Scrutiny Co-Ordinating Board, 13/10
Date: 5 October 2016 Please note the earlier start time Town Hall, Penrith, Cumbria CA11 7QF Tel: 01768 817817 Email: [email protected] Dear Sir/Madam Special Scrutiny Co-ordinating Board Agenda - 13 October 2016 Notice is hereby given that a special meeting of the Scrutiny Co-ordinating Board will be held at 6.00 pm on Thursday, 13 October 2016 at the Council Chamber, Town Hall, Penrith. 1 Apologies for Absence 2 Declarations of Interest To receive declarations of the existence and nature of any private interests, both disclosable pecuniary and any other registrable interests, in any matter to be considered or being considered. 3 2018 Review of Parliamentary Constituencies (Pages 3 - 48) To consider report G30/16 of the Deputy Chief Executive which is attached and which is to inform Members of the proposals of the Boundary Commission for England in relation to the 2018 Review of Parliamentary Constituencies and how they will affect Cumbria and Eden in particular, and to determine a means to enable the Council’s response to the consultation on them. RECOMMENDATION: That Members comment upon the proposals of the Boundary Commission with a view to recommending a response to Council. 4 Any Other Items which the Chairman decides are urgent 5 Date of Next Scheduled Meeting Yours faithfully M Neal Deputy Chief Executive (Monitoring Officer) Matthew Neal www.eden.gov.uk Deputy Chief Executive Democratic Services Contact: L Rushen Please Note: Access to the internet in the Council Chamber and Committee room is available via the guest wi-fi -
Migration Dividend Fund
MIGRATION DIVIDEND FUND A GLOBAL FUTURE REPORT JULY 2019 Contents OUR DIRECTORS / ADVISORY BOARD 4 FOREWORD by Pat McFadden 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 PART ONE – Immigration and Towns: The Case for Action 18 PART TWO – A New Approach: The Migration Dividend Fund 51 PART THREE – Communicating The Scheme 75 This research was supported by Paul Hamlyn Foundation Global Future is a fresh voice in the debate about our country’s direction. We make the case for immigration, freedom of movement and building an open and vibrant Britain that looks out to the world and succeeds in it. We believe the dynamism of our economy and creativity of our culture depends on our country remaining open to people, trade and ideas from across the world. In the emerging political divide between open and closed visions for the future, we reject the narrow nationalism of those who want to close us off or who live in the myths of the past. Instead, we believe that the only way Britain can succeed in the future is as a vibrant and open nation that reaches out to the world. Global Future’s mission is not only to help people appreciate the benefits of openness but also to understand the genuine issues that stand in the way of realising these benefits for everyone. We will explore new ways for people to take more control over what matters most in their lives without cutting themselves off from opportunities to succeed in an interconnected world. Find out more: WWW.OURGLOBALFUTURE.COM TWITTER @Global_Future Our Directors Our Advisory Board GURNEK BAINS MIKE COUPE CEO and Founder -
Greater Manchester
Chapter 1 Greater Manchester 1.1 Bolton Left = Left List You = You Party Astley Bridge Farnworth Hilary Fairclough C 2,358 Jim Lord Lab 1,151 Clive Atty LD 733 Tariq Aziz LD 955 Muhammad Rafiq Lab 572 Michelle Ionn C 531 Andy Allen You 138 Bradshaw Great Lever [Lab gain from C] Walter Hall C 2,535 Mohammed Iqbal Lab 1,657 James Cottam Lab 620 Mudasir Dean C 1,299 Lauren Alergant LD 342 Alan Johnson Grn 374 Anne Mumberson Grn 195 Mian Akhtar LD 245 Halliwell Breightmet Cliff Morris Lab 1,875 Arthur Norris C 1,696 Shahid Mahmood C 632 William Gallagher Lab 1,182 Riaz Gul LD 494 Carl Hemmings BNP 350 Stephen Howarth LD 163 Harper Green Norma Armston You 137 Lynne Hyland Grn 74 Champak Mistry Lab 1,181 Bill Dawson C 1,071 David Connor LD 390 Bromley Cross Heaton and Lostock Alan Wilkinson C 2,933 Jeremy Foster Lab 705 Alan Rushton C 3,378 David Wibberley LD 331 John Gillatt Lab 831 Liz Spencer Grn 147 Jonathan Evans LD 326 Andy Openshaw You 141 Daniel Mann Grn 249 Horwich and Blackrod [C gain Crompton [Lab gain from LD] from LD] Hanif Darvesh Lab 1,985 Pat Barrow C 1,469 John Partington C 1,113 Kevan Jones Lab 1,021 Yakub Khoda LD 873 Ian Hamilton LD 869 4 1.2. BURY 5 Consolidated Results — Bolton Conservative . 29,254 41.8% 9 councillors Labour . 22,644 32.4% 7 councillors Liberal Democrat . 14,221 20.3% 4 councillors Green Party .