DOCSLIB.ORG

Phase 1A Cultural Resources Investigation Report For

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Phase 1A Cultural Resources Investigation Report For Phase IA Cultural Resources Investigation Report Curtis Specialty Papers Site Milford, New Jersey August 2010 Prepared For: United States Environmental Protection Agency New York, NY Prepared By: International Paper Company Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products, LP ARCADIS International Paper Company Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products, LP ARCADIS Phase IA Cultural Resources Investigation Report Curtis Specialty Papers Site Milford, New Jersey Prepared by: Eugene J. Boesch Ph.D., R.P.A. Principal Investigator ARCADIS U.S., Inc. August 2010 Phase IA Cultural Resources Investigation Report Curtis Specialty Papers Site Milford, New Jersey Prepared for: United States Environmental Protection Agency Prepared by: International Paper Company Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products, LP ARCADIS U.S., Inc. Our Ref.: B0066126.0600 Date: August 2010 Table of Contents Executive Summary i 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Project Impacts 2 1.2 Site Description and Area of Potential Effect 2 1.2.1 Developed Area 2 1.2.2 CPABA 3 1.2.3 Northern Parcel 4 1.2.4 Site Operations 4 1.2.4.1 Main Mill Operations 5 1.2.4.2 Coatings Facility Operations 6 1.2.4.3 Wastewater Treatment Plant Operations 6 1.2.4.4 Aeration Basin and Coal Storage Area 6 1.3 Curtis Paper Mill Historic District 7 1.3.1 Other National Register Properties in the Site Vicinity 8 1.4 Previously Conducted Archaeological Investigations in the Site Vicinity 9 1.5 Methodology 10 2. Environmental Setting of the Site 14 2.1 Introduction 14 2.2 Geology 16 2.3 Surface Geology 16 2.4 Flora and Fauna 17 2.5 Site Soils 18 2.5.1 Developed Area Soils 18 2.5.2 CPABA 18 2.5.3 Northern Parcel 19 2.5.4 Archaeological Borings 20 3041012130 i Table of Contents 3. Documentary Research – Native American Period 21 3.1 Background Culture History 21 3.2 Native American – European Contact Period 25 3.3 Native American Sites in the Site Vicinity 28 3.4 Previously Recorded Sites on Site 29 3.5 Previously Recorded Sites within 1 Mile of the Site 31 3.6 Other Indications for Native American Activity within the Milford Area 32 4. Documentary Research – Historic Period 33 4.1 Seventeenth- Through Late Eighteenth-Century Settlement 33 4.2 Revolutionary War and Post-Revolutionary War Years 35 4.3 Nineteenth- to Early Twentieth-Century Development 36 4.4 Occupational History of the Site 37 4.4.1 Post-1907 Use of the Property: The Paper Mill Years 40 5. Assessment of Archaeological Sensitivity and Recommendations 44 5.1 Native American Period Sensitivity 44 5.1.1 Areas of Pre-Contact Period Archaeological Sensitivity 46 5.2 Historic Period Sensitivity 47 5.3 Architectural Resources 48 5.4 Recommendations 48 6. References 50 Table 1 Site Structures – Construction Dates, Building Functions, and Integrity Assessments 3041012130 ii Table of Contents Figures ES-1 Archaeologically Sensitive Locations 1 Site Location Map 2 Site Operational Areas 3 Site Plan 4 Locations of Previously Recorded Pre-Contact Period Archaeological Sites 5 1851 Cornell Map 6 1860 Lake and Beers Map 7 1860 Hughes Map 8 1873 Beers Map 9 1902 Hicks Map 10 1905 Westgard Map 11 1912 Sanborn Map 12 1927 Sanborn Map 13 Archaeologically Sensitive Locations Appendix A Photograph Log 3041012130 iii Executive Summary Executive Summary International Paper Company (IP), Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products, LP (GP), and ARCADIS U.S., Inc. prepared this Phase IA Cultural Resources Investigation Report (report). This report presents the results of a Phase IA archaeological investigation of the approximately 109-acre Curtis Specialty Papers Site, located along the Delaware River at 404 Frenchtown Road (County Route 619) in the Borough of Milford and Alexandria Township, Hunterdon County, New Jersey (site). The site was originally developed in 1907 as a manufacturing facility for food-grade paper products and operated in this capacity until operations ceased in 2003. The original occupant of the mill was the Warren Manufacturing Company, which began production in Milford 1 year later (1908). The company soon became the largest producer of glassine paper in the world and was the principal employer in Milford. At the time of its closing, the mill was owned by Curtis Papers, Inc., a leading manufacturer of premium coated and uncoated papers and a significant local employer. The Phase IA investigation was conducted in support of ongoing remedial investigation/feasibility study activities at the site. The objectives of the Phase IA investigation were to assess the likelihood that significant archaeological and/or architectural resources are present at the site and to recommend further investigations (if necessary). The New Jersey State Historic Preservation Office (NJSHPO), in an opinion dated April 29, 2003, determined that the site is eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places as the Curtis Paper Mill Historic District (NJSHPO ID# 4197) (Guzzo 2003). The Curtis Mill Historic District includes the paper mill’s industrial buildings and surrounding workers’ houses. The workers’ houses include the dwelling currently located on site as well as other, currently privately owned houses (located off site). The NJSHPO 2003 opinion was based on the continuous use of the facility as a paper mill from 1907 to 2003, its importance as the largest manufacturer of glassine paper in the world during its period of operation and as the region’s primary employer, and the large amount of original building fabric that remains. The Phase IA investigation consisted of documentary research on the past and current environmental setting, Native American culture history and site locations, and Euro- 3041012130 i Executive Summary American history of the site. Research for the Phase IA investigation was conducted at the following repositories: • Alexandria Township Historical Society • Milford Historical Society (on-line resource) • New Jersey State Museum • NJSHPO • New Jersey State Library • New Jersey State Achieves • Borough of Milford Public Library • Borough of Milford Town Hall • Hunterdon County Public Library • Holland Township Historical Society • Natural Resources Conservation Service, Clinton Field Office, Frenchtown Field Office, and on-line resource (http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov) • The Riegel Ridge Community Center, Holland Township • New York City Public Library, Local History, Map and General Research Divisions • New York City Public Library, Science, Business and Industry Library Based on documentary research, pedestrian reconnaissance, and data from archaeological borings, the archaeological sensitivity of the site was assessed. Assessment of Native American period sensitivity was based on the location of known archaeological sites reported in the literature and consideration of the present and former topographic and physiographic characteristics of the site. Assessment of Historic period sensitivity was based on an analysis of nineteenth to mid-twentieth century maps, as well as a review of other primary and secondary sources. The extent 3041012130 ii Executive Summary of nineteenth and twentieth century development at the site was evaluated with regard to likely impacts to identified archaeologically sensitive areas. Five locations at the site are considered to be sensitive for Pre-Contact period archaeological sites. One location at the site is considered to be sensitive for the presence of historic period archaeological sites. The archaeologically sensitive portions of the site are shown on Figure ES-1. Phase IB-level archaeological testing is recommended for the archaeologically sensitive areas if they will be disturbed as part of site remediation activities. Existing buildings at the site are considered to be significant properties by the NJSHPO. The buildings constitute the Curtis Paper Mill Historic District. An approach to mitigate adverse impacts to existing structures of the Curtis Paper Mill Historic District on site as a result of remediation activities will be determined through discussions among the USEPA, the NJSHPO, IP, GP and other appropriate parties. 3041012130 iii Phase IA Cultural Resources Investigation Report Milford, New Jersey 1. Introduction International Paper Company (IP), Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products, LP (GP) and ARCADIS U.S., Inc. (ARCADIS) prepared this Phase IA Cultural Resources Investigation Report (report) for the Curtis Specialty Papers Site located at 404 Frenchtown Road (County Road 619), Milford, Hunterdon County, New Jersey (site; Figure 1). The site occupies Block 13, Lot 5.01 and Block 19, Lot 51 in the Borough of Milford; and Block 17.01, Lot 1.01 in Alexandria Township (Figure 2). The site was originally developed in 1907 as a manufacturing facility for food-grade paper products and operated in this capacity until Curtis Specialty Papers ceased operations in 2003. At the time of its closing, the mill was a leading manufacturer of premium coated and uncoated papers and a significant local employer. On June 4, 2009, IP and GP entered into an Administrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent (AOC) with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) to conduct a remedial investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) at the site (Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act [CERCLA] Docket No. 02-2009-2017). The Phase IA investigation was conducted in support of ongoing RI/FS activities at the site and in accordance with the USEPA-approved Phase IA Cultural Resources Investigation Work Plan (IP et al. 2010a). The objectives of the Phase IA investigation were to assess the likelihood that
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Hudson River Valley Review
    THE HUDSON RIVER VA LLEY REVIEW A Journal of Regional Studies The Hudson River Valley Institute at Marist College is supported by a major grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities. Publisher Thomas S. Wermuth, Vice President for Academic Affairs, Marist College Editors Christopher Pryslopski, Program Director, Hudson River Valley Institute, Marist College Reed Sparling, Writer, Scenic Hudson Editorial Board The Hudson River Valley Review Myra Young Armstead, Professor of History, (ISSN 1546-3486) is published twice Bard College a year by The Hudson River Valley BG (Ret) Lance Betros, Provost, U.S. Army War Institute at Marist College. College Executive Director Kim Bridgford, Professor of English, West Chester James M. Johnson, University Poetry Center and Conference The Dr. Frank T. Bumpus Chair in Michael Groth, Professor of History, Frances Hudson River Valley History Tarlton Farenthold Presidential Professor Research Assistant Susan Ingalls Lewis, Associate Professor of History, Laila Shawwa State University of New York at New Paltz Hudson River Valley Institute Sarah Olson, Superintendent, Advisory Board Roosevelt-Vanderbilt National Historic Sites Alex Reese, Chair Barnabas McHenry, Vice Chair Roger Panetta, Visiting Professor of History, Peter Bienstock Fordham University Margaret R. Brinckerhoff H. Daniel Peck, Professor of English Emeritus, Dr. Frank T. Bumpus Vassar College Frank J. Doherty Robyn L. Rosen, Professor of History, BG (Ret) Patrick J. Garvey Marist College Shirley M. Handel Maureen Kangas David P. Schuyler, Arthur and Katherine Shadek Mary Etta Schneider Professor of Humanities and American Studies, Gayle Jane Tallardy Franklin & Marshall College Robert E. Tompkins Sr. COL Ty Seidule, Professor and Acting Head, Denise Doring VanBuren Department of History, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Viimeinen Päivitys 8
    Versio 20.10.2012 (222 siv.). HÖYRY-, TEOLLISUUS- JA LIIKENNEHISTORIAA MAAILMALLA. INDUSTRIAL AND TRANSPORTATION HERITAGE IN THE WORLD. (http://www.steamengine.fi/) Suomen Höyrykoneyhdistys ry. The Steam Engine Society of Finland. © Erkki Härö [email protected] Sisältöryhmitys: Index: 1.A. Höyry-yhdistykset, verkostot. Societies, Associations, Networks related to the Steam Heritage. 1.B. Höyrymuseot. Steam Museums. 2. Teollisuusperinneyhdistykset ja verkostot. Industrial Heritage Associations and Networks. 3. Laajat teollisuusmuseot, tiedekeskukset. Main Industrial Museums, Science Centres. 4. Energiantuotanto, voimalat. Energy, Power Stations. 5.A. Paperi ja pahvi. Yhdistykset ja verkostot. Paper and Cardboard History. Associations and Networks. 5.B. Paperi ja pahvi. Museot. Paper and Cardboard. Museums. 6. Puusepänteollisuus, sahat ja uitto jne. Sawmills, Timber Floating, Woodworking, Carpentry etc. 7.A. Metalliruukit, metalliteollisuus. Yhdistykset ja verkostot. Ironworks, Metallurgy. Associations and Networks. 7.B. Ruukki- ja metalliteollisuusmuseot. Ironworks, Metallurgy. Museums. 1 8. Konepajateollisuus, koneet. Yhdistykset ja museot. Mechanical Works, Machinery. Associations and Museums. 9.A. Kaivokset ja louhokset (metallit, savi, kivi, kalkki). Yhdistykset ja verkostot. Mining, Quarrying, Peat etc. Associations and Networks. 9.B. Kaivosmuseot. Mining Museums. 10. Tiiliteollisuus. Brick Industry. 11. Lasiteollisuus, keramiikka. Glass, Clayware etc. 12.A. Tekstiiliteollisuus, nahka. Verkostot. Textile Industry, Leather. Networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Researching and Reviving the Unami Language of the Lenape
    Endangered Languages, Linguistics, and Culture: Researching and Reviving the Unami Language of the Lenape By Maureen Hoffmann A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the degree of Bachelor of Arts in Anthropology and Linguistics Bryn Mawr College May 2009 Table of Contents Abstract........................................................................................................................... 3 Acknowledgments........................................................................................................... 4 List of Figures................................................................................................................. 5 I. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 6 II. The Lenape People and Their Languages .................................................................. 9 III. Language Endangerment and Language Loss ........................................................ 12 a. What is language endangerment?.......................................................................... 12 b. How does a language become endangered?.......................................................... 14 c. What can save a language from dying?................................................................. 17 d. The impact of language loss on culture ................................................................ 20 e. The impact of language loss on academia............................................................. 21 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Native American Languages, Indigenous Languages of the Native Peoples of North, Middle, and South America
    Native American Languages, indigenous languages of the native peoples of North, Middle, and South America. The precise number of languages originally spoken cannot be known, since many disappeared before they were documented. In North America, around 300 distinct, mutually unintelligible languages were spoken when Europeans arrived. Of those, 187 survive today, but few will continue far into the 21st century, since children are no longer learning the vast majority of these. In Middle America (Mexico and Central America) about 300 languages have been identified, of which about 140 are still spoken. South American languages have been the least studied. Around 1500 languages are known to have been spoken, but only about 350 are still in use. These, too are disappearing rapidly. Classification A major task facing scholars of Native American languages is their classification into language families. (A language family consists of all languages that have evolved from a single ancestral language, as English, German, French, Russian, Greek, Armenian, Hindi, and others have all evolved from Proto-Indo-European.) Because of the vast number of languages spoken in the Americas, and the gaps in our information about many of them, the task of classifying these languages is a challenging one. In 1891, Major John Wesley Powell proposed that the languages of North America constituted 58 independent families, mainly on the basis of superficial vocabulary resemblances. At the same time Daniel Brinton posited 80 families for South America. These two schemes form the basis of subsequent classifications. In 1929 Edward Sapir tentatively proposed grouping these families into superstocks, 6 in North America and 15 in Middle America.
    [Show full text]
  • A Treatise on the Assault on Language Sovereignty in the United States: History, Education, and Implications for Policy
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2014 A Treatise on the Assault on Language Sovereignty in the United States: History, Education, and Implications for Policy Annie Thornburg Oakes The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Oakes, Annie Thornburg, "A Treatise on the Assault on Language Sovereignty in the United States: History, Education, and Implications for Policy" (2014). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 4407. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/4407 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A TREATISE ON THE ASSAULT ON LANGUAGE SOVEREIGNTY IN THE UNITED STATES: HISTORY, EDUCATION, AND IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY By ANNIE THORNBURG OAKES Bachelor‟s Degrees, University of Utah, 1973, and Eastern Washington University, 2006 Master‟s Degree, Eastern Washington University, 1996 DISSERTATION presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology, Cultural Heritage Studies The University of Montana Missoula, MT May 2014 Approved by: Sandy Ross, Dean of the Graduate School Graduate School S. Neyooxet Greymorning, Chair Anthropology Gregory Campbell Anthropology Richmond Clow Native American Studies Leora Bar-El Anthropology Irene Appelbaum Anthropology University of Montana Dissertation 2 COPYRIGHT by Annie T.
    [Show full text]
  • [.35 **Natural Language Processing Class Here Computational Linguistics See Manual at 006.35 Vs
    006 006 006 DeweyiDecimaliClassification006 006 [.35 **Natural language processing Class here computational linguistics See Manual at 006.35 vs. 410.285 *Use notation 019 from Table 1 as modified at 004.019 400 DeweyiDecimaliClassification 400 400 DeweyiDecimali400Classification Language 400 [400 [400 *‡Language Class here interdisciplinary works on language and literature For literature, see 800; for rhetoric, see 808. For the language of a specific discipline or subject, see the discipline or subject, plus notation 014 from Table 1, e.g., language of science 501.4 (Option A: To give local emphasis or a shorter number to a specific language, class in 410, where full instructions appear (Option B: To give local emphasis or a shorter number to a specific language, place before 420 through use of a letter or other symbol. Full instructions appear under 420–490) 400 DeweyiDecimali400Classification Language 400 SUMMARY [401–409 Standard subdivisions and bilingualism [410 Linguistics [420 English and Old English (Anglo-Saxon) [430 German and related languages [440 French and related Romance languages [450 Italian, Dalmatian, Romanian, Rhaetian, Sardinian, Corsican [460 Spanish, Portuguese, Galician [470 Latin and related Italic languages [480 Classical Greek and related Hellenic languages [490 Other languages 401 DeweyiDecimali401Classification Language 401 [401 *‡Philosophy and theory See Manual at 401 vs. 121.68, 149.94, 410.1 401 DeweyiDecimali401Classification Language 401 [.3 *‡International languages Class here universal languages; general
    [Show full text]
  • Language Index
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-86573-9 - Endangered Languages: An Introduction Sarah G. Thomason Index More information Language index ||Gana, 106, 110 Bininj, 31, 40, 78 Bitterroot Salish, see Salish-Pend d’Oreille. Abenaki, Eastern, 96, 176; Western, 96, 176 Blackfoot, 74, 78, 90, 96, 176 Aboriginal English (Australia), 121 Bosnian, 87 Aboriginal languages (Australia), 9, 17, 31, 56, Brahui, 63 58, 62, 106, 110, 132, 133 Breton, 25, 39, 179 Afro-Asiatic languages, 49, 175, 180, 194, 198 Bulgarian, 194 Ainu, 10 Buryat, 19 Akkadian, 1, 42, 43, 177, 194 Bushman, see San. Albanian, 28, 40, 66, 185; Arbëresh Albanian, 28, 40; Arvanitika Albanian, 28, 40, 66, 72 Cacaopera, 45 Aleut, 50–52, 104, 155, 183, 188; see also Bering Carrier, 31, 41, 170, 174 Aleut, Mednyj Aleut Catalan, 192 Algic languages, 97, 109, 176; see also Caucasian languages, 148 Algonquian languages, Ritwan languages. Celtic languages, 25, 46, 179, 183, Algonquian languages, 57, 62, 95–97, 101, 104, 185 108, 109, 162, 166, 176, 187, 191 Central Torres Strait, 9 Ambonese Malay, see Malay. Chadic languages, 175 Anatolian languages, 43 Chantyal, 31, 40 Apache, 177 Chatino, Zenzontepec, 192 Apachean languages, 177 Chehalis, Lower, see Lower Chehalis. Arabic, 1, 19, 22, 37, 43, 49, 63, 65, 101, 194; Chehalis, Upper, see Upper Chehalis. Classical Arabic, 8, 103 Cheyenne, 96, 176 Arapaho, 78, 96, 176; Northern Arapaho, 73, 90, Chinese languages (“dialects”), 22, 35, 37, 41, 92 48, 69, 101, 196; Mandarin, 35; Arawakan languages, 81 Wu, 118; see also Putonghua, Arbëresh, see Albanian. Chinook, Clackamas, see Clackamas Armenian, 185 Chinook.
    [Show full text]
  • Newark Prepares for Red Feather Campaign at Monday Night Meet
    F01' ' /'\\'8 THENE !'l' UIII (' YOII rno\\' KPOST Hl'ad Tht.' Pu!> ! Fresh lnen Forbidden 450 Split Level ·Z 1 N; k Homes Scheduled $25,000 liit·e Hit IChrysler To Subnlit 11ank Bid 0/ All~01nobl e ,It, ~~a.l~ For Development 1Local Lluuher .Co. C tinue Local Operation On Tuesday Nlght ~0 · Of Dcia ware ),,;slles 1! ~ l n ro A id ~Ity I arkm~ $5 M iIIi()n~tr uct.i on on [lpperclH ssmcn l lrg'cd 10 Lcav~ Ca~s A! Homc , Planncd For Scction M- --- Local Tanll Planl Manager 'lales IJid "ill Ue ubmi/ted T h i rd Di a l cr In 'I'hree " In 'l'he Ncar F u t ure" For Continued I'roduclion of M-48 io n'l'ag f'lan nec/ 1"01' Camllus I al'kmg I rogram In Brookside Communit; I Year Da mage Warehou 'C Mcdium Tanl< At Newark; Modification Work onlinut.'s VII I'" I~,\'of lJelall'HI'C fl'cs hn,1en, othel', th, an --_ As 60 Aetnamen Res llond 11 b h b I Plans for the construction of 450 Irving J, Minett, operating manager of the hrysl I' ing dail y from lheil' h o.m cH, WI e pro , I I t~( split-lev I homes at the Brookside Within a period of three short mllin ta ining , or oPc r a~lIlg a motor vehicle 111 g:~~IO~~~:tnc:a~y Nt1~aS~L h~~~ months, fire again struck Ihe Ncw­ Delaware Tank Plant in Newark, aid thi week thaL hry Icr ark Lumber Company when a blaz the 1954-53 acade mic yca r, Upperclas,smen velopment Company, headed by of undetel'mi ned origin broke out will s ubmit its bid for Lhe production of additional Patton to leave their CH I', at h ome un less sUltabl Al'Ilold Mattei of Wilmington.
    [Show full text]
  • WHY WE SHOULD CARE ABOUT LANGUAGE DEATH Wael
    International Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research Vol.5, No 5, pp. 62-73, October 2017 ___Published by European Centre for Research Training and Development UK (www.eajournals.org) WHY WE SHOULD CARE ABOUT LANGUAGE DEATH Wael Abdulrahman Almurashi Department of Languages and Translations, Faculty of Science and Arts, Taibah University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia ABSTRACT: The fortunes of any language can fall and rise and are linked familiarly to the fortunes of their speakers. Nowadays, there are many languages becoming widely spoken. Though, it is difficult for smaller languages to survive, a significant number of languages that have been successfully revitalized. The purpose of this paper is to explore themes of language death in various respects, with focus on why we should care about languages dying. This paper also answered some questions regarding the definition of language death and the estimated number of languages are endangered and currently in use. Additionally, it highlighted the problems surrounding the loss of languages, and provided some constructive solutions to reclaim and revive dead and endangered languages. This paper also included a number of recommendations for linguists and endangered language speakers or communities. KEYWORDS: Language Death, Endangered Language, Linguists, Language Revival, Reclaim. INTRODUCTION The importance of a language rises and ebbs in direct proportion to the importance enjoyed by the people who speak that language. Of late, many different languages are being spoken on a mass basis by a large number of people. Therefore, it is becoming difficult for smaller languages to survive. However, the possibility of the revival of smaller languages is not entirely gloomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Language Use Among Burmese Refugees
    F200: Application for Human Research PROJECT TITLE: LANGUAGE USE AMONG BURMESE REFUGEES INVESTIGATOR INFORMATION Principal Investigator Name, Maureen Hoffmann, M.A. Degree(s): Affiliation UA B–UMG Other: Principal Investigator UA NetID mhoffm Status/Rank: Ph.D. Candidate Center: Department: Anthropology & Linguistics College: Social & Behavioral Sciences Contact phone: 812-345-0831 Official Institutional Email: [email protected] ADVISOR CONTACT INFORMATION (REQUIRED FOR ALL STUDENTS AND RESIDENTS) Name, Degree(s), UA NetID: Natasha Warner, Ph.D., nwarner Contact phone: 520-626-5591 Official University Email: [email protected] ALTERNATE/COORDINATOR or Co-PI CONTACT INFORMATION Name, UA NetID: Contact phone: Official University Email: Page 1 of 14 HSPP Use Only: Form 200 v 2016-01 SECTION 1: REQUIRED SIGNATURES 1. PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR I will conduct my study according to the University of Arizona HSPP policies and procedures for research with human subjects. 5/9/2016 Maureen Hoffmann Signature Date Print Name 2. ADVISOR (FOR ALL STUDENTS AND RESIDENTS ACTING AS THE PI) I will oversee the student researcher according to the University of Arizona HSPP policies and procedures for research with human subjects. 5/9/2016 Natasha Warner Signature Date Print Name 3. SCIENTIFIC/SCHOLARLY REVIEW (SEE HSPP GUIDANCE ON REQUIREMENTS FOR SCIENTIFIC/SCHOLARLY ASSESSMENT - INCLUDE DOCUMENTATION FOR OPTIONS A AND B WITH SUBMISSION MATERIALS.) a. Nationally based, federal funding organization (NIH, NSF) subject to full peer review b. Nationally based, non-federal funding organization (March of Dimes, Amer Academy of Pediatrics) subject to peer review c. Locally constituted peer review (signature required) May 16, 2016 Simin Karimi Signature Date Print Name 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal #2856
    Journal #2856 from sdc 5.20.13 GEA National Geothermal Summit 2013 Indian Territory ‘Why I Farm’ to be released by Tahoe publisher GARDENS AND LEARNING, AND MORE Alice E. Kober, 43; Lost to History No More Statistics show trends in families The U.N. Wants You to Eat More Bugs Forest Service Seeks to Silence Smokey the Bear Over Fracking Extinct languages of North America Flaxseed: The Next Superfood For Cattle And Beef? Scholarships For College Students Miss Indian Nations Guatemala Genocide Conviction and a More Just Vision for American Continent GEA National Geothermal Summit 2013 The Geothermal Energy Association will host the third annual National Geothermal Summit (#GEASummit2013) at the Grand Sierra Resort and Casino in Reno, Nev., June 26-27. ****************************************************************************** Indian Territory www.youtube.com ****************************************************************************** ‘Why I Farm’ to be released by Tahoe publisher On: May 14, 2013 On June 6, Meyers’ publisher Bona Fide Books will release “Why I Farm: Risking It All for a Life on the Land” by Sierra Valley Farms owner Gary Romano. A book signing will be that evening from 6-7 at Campo restaurant in Reno. In “Why I Farm,” third-generation farmer Romano speaks from experience about today’s most vital issues: how to live with purpose and how to protect our food supply. The author documents a disappearing way of life and issues a wake-up call, describing his metamorphosis from a small boy growing up on a farm to adult white-collar worker and his ultimate return to the land. He details specific issues that small farms face today, and how they will challenge our food future.
    [Show full text]
  • June 17, 1909. Congressional Record -Senate
    \-, ..JUNE 17, 1909. CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-SENATE._ the -Speak~r of the House of Representatives and to the President of SENATE. the United States Senate. L. H. BANCROFT, THUitSDAY, Jime 17, 1909. Speaker of tlle Assembly. c. E. SHAFFER, The Senate met at 10 o'clock a. m. Chief alerk of the Assmnbly. ' Prayer by Rev. Ulysses G. B. Pierce, D. D., of the city of (Under protest.) JOHN STRANGE, Washington. Presi dent of the Senate. F. E. ANDREWS, : The Journal of yesterday's·proceedings was read and approved. Chief Clerk of the Senate. I> FRENCH SPOLIATION CLAIMS . BILL INTRODUCED. The VICE-PRESIDENT laid before the Senate communica­ A bill was introduced, read the first time, and, by unanimous tions from the assistant clerk of the Court of Claims, trans­ consent, the second time, and referred as follows : mittin,g the 1indings pf fact and conc~usions of law, filed under By Mr. BEVERIDGE: {he acf of January 20, 1885, in the' French spoliation claims set A bill (S. 2625) granting an increase of pension to John H. out in the findings by the court relating to the following causes: Kimmel; to the Committee on Pensions. In the cause of the . vessel schooner Liberty, Josiah 'Rich, TAXES ON INCOMES. master ·(s. 'Doc. No. 100); Mr. BROWN. I introduce a joint resolution, which I ask · In the cause of the vessel sloop George, John Grant, master may be read and referred to the Committee on Finance. "(S. Doc_•. No. 101) ; . The joint resolution (S. J. R. 39) to amend the Constitution .
    [Show full text]