Ofr 2005-1279

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ofr 2005-1279 NEAR-FIELD RECEIVING WATER MONITORING OF TRACE METALS AND A BENTHIC COMMUNITY NEAR THE PALO ALTO REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL PLANT IN SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO BAY, CALIFORNIA: 2004 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OPEN FILE REPORT 2005-1279 Prepared in cooperation with the CITY OF PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. NEAR-FIELD RECEIVING WATER MONITORING OF TRACE METALS AND A BENTHIC COMMUNITY NEAR THE PALO ALTO REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL PLANT IN SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO BAY, CALIFORNIA: 2004 Edward Moon, Michelle K. Shouse, Francis Parchaso, Janet K. Thompson, Samuel N. Luoma, Daniel J. Cain and Michelle I. Hornberger U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OPEN FILE REPORT 2005-1279 Prepared in cooperation with the CITY OF PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA Menlo Park, California i U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE NORTON, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES GROAT, Director For Additional Information Copies of this report may be Write to: obtained from the authors or Samuel N. Luoma, MS 465 U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Information Center 345 Middlefield Road Box 25286, MS 517 Menlo Park, CA 94025 Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 ii Table of contents Table of contents............................................................................................................................. 1 List of figures.................................................................................................................................. 2 List of tables.................................................................................................................................... 3 Abstract........................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 5 Environmental Monitoring.......................................................................................................... 5 Trace Metals............................................................................................................................ 5 Benthic Community Response to Trace Metals...................................................................... 5 RWQCB and NPDES ............................................................................................................. 6 Objectives ................................................................................................................................... 6 Approach..................................................................................................................................... 6 Study Site........................................................................................................................................ 7 Methods........................................................................................................................................... 8 Sampling Frequency ................................................................................................................... 8 Sediment ..................................................................................................................................... 8 Clams .......................................................................................................................................... 9 Metals Analysis........................................................................................................................... 9 Reproductive Activity............................................................................................................... 10 Community Analysis ................................................................................................................ 10 Results and Discussion ................................................................................................................. 11 Salinity ...................................................................................................................................... 11 Sediments.................................................................................................................................. 11 Metals in Clams ........................................................................................................................ 12 Reproduction of Macoma petalum............................................................................................ 13 Benthic Community.................................................................................................................. 13 Summary....................................................................................................................................... 15 Long-term Observations ........................................................................................................... 15 2004........................................................................................................................................... 16 Value of Long-Term Monitoring.............................................................................................. 16 References..................................................................................................................................... 18 Figures........................................................................................................................................... 22 Tables............................................................................................................................................ 67 Appendix A................................................................................................................................. A-1 Appendix B ................................................................................................................................. B-1 Appendix C ................................................................................................................................. C-1 Appendix D................................................................................................................................. D-1 Appendix E ..................................................................................................................................E-1 Appendix F...................................................................................................................................F-1 Appendix G................................................................................................................................. G-1 Appendix H................................................................................................................................. H-1 1 List of figures Figure 1. Location of the Palo Alto sampling station in South San Francisco Bay...................... 23 Figure 2. Precipitation................................................................................................................... 24 Figure 3. Water column salinity.................................................................................................... 25 Figure 4. Aluminum, iron and silt/clay in sediments.................................................................... 26 Figure 5. Chromium, nickel and vanadium in sediments ............................................................. 27 Figure 6. Copper in sediments ...................................................................................................... 28 Figure 7. Zinc in sediments........................................................................................................... 29 Figure 8. Silver in sediments ........................................................................................................ 30 Figure 9. Selenium and mercury in sediments.............................................................................. 31 Figure 10. Annual mean copper in Macoma petalum................................................................... 32 Figure 11. Annual mean silver in Macoma petalum..................................................................... 33 Figure 12. Copper in Macoma petalum ........................................................................................ 34 Figure 13. Silver in Macoma petalum........................................................................................... 35 Figure 14. Chromium in Macoma petalum................................................................................... 36 Figure 15. Nickel in Macoma petalum ......................................................................................... 37 Figure 16. Zinc in Macoma petalum............................................................................................. 38 Figure 17. Mercury in Macoma petalum ...................................................................................... 39 Figure 18. Selenium Macoma petalum ......................................................................................... 40 Figure 19. Condition index of Macoma petalum.......................................................................... 41 Figure 20. Reproductive activity of Macoma petalum ................................................................. 42 Figure 21. Reproductive activity of Macoma petalum 2000 thru 2004.......................................
Recommended publications
  • Life in the Spray Zone
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Zoosystematics and Evolution Jahr/Year: 2018 Band/Volume: 94 Autor(en)/Author(s): Pimenta Alexandre Dias, Santos Franklin N., Cunha Carlo M. Artikel/Article: Redescription and reassignment of Ondina semicingulata to the Pyramidellidae, with review of the occurrence of genus Evalea in the Western Atlantic (Gastropoda) 535-544 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence (CC-BY); original download https://pensoft.net/journals Zoosyst. Evol. 9@ (@) 2018, ##–## | DOI 10.3897/[email protected] Redescription and reassignment of Ondina semicingulata to the Pyramidellidae, with review of the occurrence of genus Evalea in the Western Atlantic (Gastropoda) Alexandre D. Pimenta1, Franklin N. Santos2, Carlo M. Cunha3 1 Departamento de Invertebrados, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, 20940-040, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 2 Departamento de Educação e Ciências Humanas, Centro Universitário Norte do Espírito Santo, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, São Mateus 29932–540, Espírito Santo, Brazil 3 Universidade Metropolitana de Santos. Ave. Conselheiro Nébias 536, 11045-002, Santos, SP, Brazil http://zoobank.org/ Corresponding author: Alexandre D. Pimenta ([email protected]) Abstract Received 31 July 2018 Acteon semicingulatus Dall, 1927, previously known only by its original description is Accepted @@ ##### 2018 reassigned to the Pyramidellidae, in Ondina, based on the collecting of several new spec- Published @@ ##### 2018 imens along the coast of Brazil, in the same bathymetry as the type locality. Its shell shape variation is discussed and Odostomia (Evalea) ryclea Dall, 1927 is considered a synony- Academic editor: my.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ultrastructure of Spermatozoa and Spermiogenesis in Pyramidellid Gastropods, and Its Systematic Importance John M
    HELGOLANDER MEERESUNTERSUCHUNGEN Helgol~inder Meeresunters. 42,303-318 (1988) The ultrastructure of spermatozoa and spermiogenesis in pyramidellid gastropods, and its systematic importance John M. Healy School of Biological Sciences (Zoology, A08), University of Sydney; 2006, New South Wales, Australia ABSTRACT: Ultrastructural observations on spermiogenesis and spermatozoa of selected pyramidellid gastropods (species of Turbonilla, ~gulina, Cingufina and Hinemoa) are presented. During spermatid development, the condensing nucleus becomes initially anterio-posteriorly com- pressed or sometimes cup-shaped. Concurrently, the acrosomal complex attaches to an electron- dense layer at the presumptive anterior pole of the nucleus, while at the opposite (posterior) pole of the nucleus a shallow invagination is formed to accommodate the centriolar derivative. Midpiece formation begins soon after these events have taken place, and involves the following processes: (1) the wrapping of individual mitochondria around the axoneme/coarse fibre complex; (2) later internal metamorphosis resulting in replacement of cristae by paracrystalline layers which envelope the matrix material; and (3) formation of a glycogen-filled helix within the mitochondrial derivative (via a secondary wrapping of mitochondria). Advanced stages of nuclear condensation {elongation, transformation of fibres into lamellae, subsequent compaction) and midpiece formation proceed within a microtubular sheath ('manchette'). Pyramidellid spermatozoa consist of an acrosomal complex (round
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Anatomy of Four Primitive Muricacean Gastropods: Implications for Trophonine Phylogeny
    ^/ -S/ COMPARATIVE ANATOMY OF FOUR PRIMITIVE MURICACEAN GASTROPODS: IMPLICATIONS FOR TROPHONINE PHYLOGENY M. G. HARASEWYCH DEPARTMENT OF INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY NATIONAL MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20560, U.S.A. ABSTRACT The main features of the shell, head-foot, palliai complex, alimentary and reproductive systems of Trophon geversianus (Pallas), Boreotrophon aculeatus (Watson), Paziella pazi (Crosse), and Nucella lamellosa (Gmelin) are described, and phonetic and cladistic analyses based on subsets of these data presented. Similarities in shell morphology revealed by phenetic studies are interpreted as being due to convergence, and are indicative of similar habitats rather than of close phylogenetic relationships. Convergences are also noted in radular and stomach characters. Cladistic analyses of anatomical data support the following conclusions: 1 ) Thaididae are a primitive and ancient family of muricaceans forming a clade equal in taxonomic rank with Muncidae; 2) Within Muricidae, P. pazi more closely resembles the ancestral muricid phenotype than any trophonine; 3) Trophoninae comprise a comparatively recent monophyletic group with differences due to a subsequent austral adaptive radiation. The Muricidae are considered to be the most primitive and D'Attilio, 1976:13) a personal communication from E. H. family within Neogastropoda according to most (Thiele, Vokes "it appears likely that the most northern trophons are 1929; Wenz, 1941; Taylor and Sohl, 1962; Boss, 1982) but derived from the Paziella-Poiheha line, and that the several not all (Golikov and Starobogatov, 1975) recent classifica- austral forms that are unquestionably "trophonine" are prob- tions. Of the five subfamilies of Muricidae, the Trophoninae, ably derived from the Thaididae". proposed by Cossmann (1903) on the basis of shell and Thus, according to most published work, the Tropho- opercular characters to include a number of boreal and ninae are in a position to shed light on the systematics and austral species, are the most poorly understood.
    [Show full text]
  • Urosalpinx Cinerea (Say, 1822)
    Urosalpinx cinerea (Say, 1822) AphiaID: 140429 ATLANTIC OYSTER DRILL Animalia (Reino) > Mollusca (Filo) > Gastropoda (Classe) > Caenogastropoda (Subclasse) > Neogastropoda (Ordem) > Muricoidea (Superfamilia) > Muricidae (Familia) Sinónimos Fusus cinereus Say, 1822 Urosalpinx cinerea var. follyensis B. B. Baker, 1951 Referências additional source Hayward, P.J.; Ryland, J.S. (Ed.). (1990). The marine fauna of the British Isles and North-West Europe: 1. Introduction and protozoans to arthropods. Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK. ISBN 0-19-857356-1. 627 pp. [details] additional source Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS). , available online at http://www.itis.gov [details] additional source Turgeon, D.; Quinn, J.F.; Bogan, A.E.; Coan, E.V.; Hochberg, F.G.; Lyons, W.G.; Mikkelsen, P.M.; Neves, R.J.; Roper, C.F.E.; Rosenberg, G.; Roth, B.; Scheltema, A.; Thompson, F.G.; Vecchione, M.; Williams, J.D. (1998). Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada: mollusks. 2nd ed. American Fisheries Society Special Publication, 26. American Fisheries Society: Bethesda, MD (USA). ISBN 1-888569-01-8. IX, 526 + cd-rom pp. [details] basis of record Gofas, S.; Le Renard, J.; Bouchet, P. (2001). Mollusca. in: Costello, M.J. et al. (eds), European Register of Marine Species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification. Patrimoines Naturels. 50: 180-213. [details] additional source Bromley, J.E.C., and J.S. Bleakney. (1984). Keys to the fauna and flora of Minas Basin. National Research Council of Canada Report 24119. 366 p. [details] additional source Gosner, K. L. (1971). Guide to identification of marine and estuarine invertebrates: Cape Hatteras to the Bay of Fundy.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Checklist of the Marine Macroinvertebrates of Alaska David T
    NOAA Professional Paper NMFS 19 An annotated checklist of the marine macroinvertebrates of Alaska David T. Drumm • Katherine P. Maslenikov Robert Van Syoc • James W. Orr • Robert R. Lauth Duane E. Stevenson • Theodore W. Pietsch November 2016 U.S. Department of Commerce NOAA Professional Penny Pritzker Secretary of Commerce National Oceanic Papers NMFS and Atmospheric Administration Kathryn D. Sullivan Scientific Editor* Administrator Richard Langton National Marine National Marine Fisheries Service Fisheries Service Northeast Fisheries Science Center Maine Field Station Eileen Sobeck 17 Godfrey Drive, Suite 1 Assistant Administrator Orono, Maine 04473 for Fisheries Associate Editor Kathryn Dennis National Marine Fisheries Service Office of Science and Technology Economics and Social Analysis Division 1845 Wasp Blvd., Bldg. 178 Honolulu, Hawaii 96818 Managing Editor Shelley Arenas National Marine Fisheries Service Scientific Publications Office 7600 Sand Point Way NE Seattle, Washington 98115 Editorial Committee Ann C. Matarese National Marine Fisheries Service James W. Orr National Marine Fisheries Service The NOAA Professional Paper NMFS (ISSN 1931-4590) series is pub- lished by the Scientific Publications Of- *Bruce Mundy (PIFSC) was Scientific Editor during the fice, National Marine Fisheries Service, scientific editing and preparation of this report. NOAA, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98115. The Secretary of Commerce has The NOAA Professional Paper NMFS series carries peer-reviewed, lengthy original determined that the publication of research reports, taxonomic keys, species synopses, flora and fauna studies, and data- this series is necessary in the transac- intensive reports on investigations in fishery science, engineering, and economics. tion of the public business required by law of this Department.
    [Show full text]
  • Gastropods: of the Oligocene to Recent Genera and Description Of
    Research 2006 Cainozoic , 4(1-2), pp. 71-96, February The Cantharus Group of Pisaniine Buccinid Gastropods: Review of the Oligocene to Recent Genera and Description of Some New Species of Gemophos and Hesperisternia ¹ Geerat+J. Vermeij ' Departmentof Geology, University ofCalifornia at Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA; e-mail: vermeij @geology,ucdavis. edu Received: 12 May 2004; revised version accepted 22 December 2004 The Cantharus of buccinid is in the Recent interval twelve of group pisaniine gastropods represented Oligocene to by genera, two which extinct. I review the and fossil record of these Anna 1826 are species composition, synonymy, characteristics, genera: Risso, (early Oligocene to Recent, eastern Atlantic); Cancellopollia Vermeij and Bouchet, 1998 (Recent, Indo-West Pacific); Cantharus Rdding, 1798 (Pliocene to Recent, Indo-West Pacific); Editharus Vermeij, 2001a (early Eocene to early Oligocene, Europe); Gemophos Olsson and Harbison, 1953 (late Miocene to Recent, tropical and subtropical America, one species in West Africa); Hes- peristernia Gardner, 1944 (late Oligocene to Recent, tropical and subtropical America); Pallia Gray in Sowerby, 1834 (early Mio- cene to Recent, Indo-West Pacific; one species in West Africa); Preangeria Martin, 1921 (early Miocene to Recent, Indo-West Pa- cific); Prodotia Dali, 1924 (?late Miocene to Recent, Indo-West Pacific); Pusio Gray in Griffith and Pidgeon, 1834 (?early and middle Miocene, late Miocene to Recent, eastern Pacific); Solenosteira Dali, 1890 (late Miocene to Recent, tropical America); and Zeapollia Finlay, 1927 (Oligocene to Pliocene, Australia and New Zealand). Besides many generic reassignments, I describe the basidentatus Pleistocene, Pliocene, following new species: Gemophos (early Florida); G.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Disturbance Combined with Life History Traits Facilitate Establishment of Rapana Venosa in the Chesapeake Bay
    W&M ScholarWorks VIMS Articles Virginia Institute of Marine Science 2016 Habitat Disturbance Combined With Life History Traits Facilitate Establishment Of Rapana Venosa In The Chesapeake Bay Juliana M. Harding Virginia Institute of Marine Science Roger L. Mann Virginia Institute of Marine Science Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/vimsarticles Part of the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Harding, Juliana M. and Mann, Roger L., "Habitat Disturbance Combined With Life History Traits Facilitate Establishment Of Rapana Venosa In The Chesapeake Bay" (2016). VIMS Articles. 308. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/vimsarticles/308 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Virginia Institute of Marine Science at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in VIMS Articles by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of Shellfish Research, Vol. 35, No. 4, 885–910, 2016. HABITAT DISTURBANCE COMBINED WITH LIFE HISTORY TRAITS FACILITATE ESTABLISHMENT OF RAPANA VENOSA IN THE CHESAPEAKE BAY JULIANA M. HARDING1,2* AND ROGER MANN1 1Department of Fisheries Science, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary, P.O. Box 1346, Gloucester Point, VA 23062; 2Department of Marine Science, Coastal Carolina University, P.O. Box 261954, Conway, SC 29528 ABSTRACT The veined rapa whelk (Rapana venosa) invasion of the Chesapeake Bay in the United States was first observed in 1998. Chesapeake Bay rapa whelk population demographics, age-at-length relationships, and invasion progression (temporal, spatial) from 1998 to 2009 are described. Between June 1998 and November 2009, 27,624 rapa whelks, ranging from 11- to 195-mm shell length (SL), were collected from the lower Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of Mollusks of Chesapeake Bay
    W&M ScholarWorks Reports 1956 Annotated checklist of mollusks of Chesapeake Bay J. D. Andrews Virginia Fisheries Laboratory Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/reports Part of the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Andrews, J. D. (1956) Annotated checklist of mollusks of Chesapeake Bay. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, William & Mary. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/reports/2399 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Reports by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF MOLLUSKS OF CHESAPEAKE BAY (Revised April 1956) J. D. Andrews Virginia Fisheries Laboratory Gloucester Point This preliminary checklist has been prepared for the use of students and biologists working in the Chesapeake Bay area. The list is conservative and probably omits a number of species, especially small snails and parasitic groups like the pyrams. All species listed, with one or two exceptions, have been collected as live specimens by the author, and collections of each have been deposited in the U. S. National Museum. Species given in the literature but not yet confirmed by specimens in the National Museum have been purposely omitted. The checklist includes all species collected in the brackish waters of Chesapeake Bay except certain fresh-water groups, e.g. the hydrobiids, which invade salty waters a short distance. The ocean shore of Virginia, both on Eastern Shore and the mainland, has been excluded. The families are arranged in the order found in Johnson's checklist and the nomenclature follows Johnson except where Abbott or Johnsonia give changes.
    [Show full text]
  • 53 Artefactos Malacológicos. Diferentes
    53 COMECHINGONIA. Revista de Arqueología. Vol. 23, n° 1. Primer semestre de 2019. ISSN: 0326-7911 __________________________________________________________________________ ARTEFACTOS MALACOLÓGICOS. DIFERENTES CONTEXTOS DE USO EN SITIOS ARQUEOLÓGICOS DE LA PROVINCIA DE LA PAMPA (ARGENTINA). MALACOLOGICAL ARTIFACTS. DIFERENT USE CONTEXTS IN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES OF LA PAMPA PROVINCE (ARGENTINA). Mónica Berón1 1IDECU, Museo Etnográfico, CONICET, UBA, Moreno 350 (1091) CABA. [email protected] Presentado: 11/04/2018 - Aceptado: 06/11/2018 Resumen El empleo de malacofauna en sitios arqueológicos de la Pampa Occidental presenta una amplia distribución espacial y cronológica. Las especies identificadas corresponden a gasterópodos y bivalvos, tanto de origen marino como dulceacuícola. La distancia de los depósitos de malacofauna marina a los sitios de la región señala la importancia económica, social y simbólica de estos materiales, para diversos usos. Se presenta una descripción de los conjuntos analizados tanto en sitios residenciales como mortuorios. Se evalúa su significación según los contextos de hallazgo, la cronología y las diferentes escalas espaciales de análisis, en relación con las redes de movilidad e interacción de los cazadores –recolectores pampeanos. Palabras clave: malacofauna, cultura material, procedencia, significación. Abstract The use of malacofauna in archaeological sites of Western Pampa has a wide spatial and chronological distribution. The species identified correspond to gastropods and bivalves, both marine and freshwater. The distance of the deposits of marine malacofauna to the sites of the region indicates the economic, social and symbolic importance of these materials, for different uses. A description of the analyzed sets is presented in both residential and mortuary sites. Its significance is evaluated according to the contexts of discovery, the chronology and the different analytical spatial scales, in relation to the mobility and interaction networks of the pampean hunters-gatherers.
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonal Oyster Harvesting Recorded in a Late Archaic Period Shell Ring
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Seasonal oyster harvesting recorded in a Late Archaic period shell ring ☯ ☯ Nicole R. CannarozziID* , Michal Kowalewski Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America ☯ These authors contributed equally to this work. * [email protected] a1111111111 a1111111111 Abstract a1111111111 a1111111111 The function of Late Archaic period (5000±3000 B.P.) shell rings has been a focus of debate a1111111111 among archaeologists for decades. These rings have been variously interpreted as a prod- uct of seasonal feasting/ceremonial gatherings, quotidian food refuse generated by perma- nent dwellers, or a combination of seasonal and perennial activities. Seasonality of shell rings can be assessed by reconstructing the harvest time of oysters (Crassostrea virginica), OPEN ACCESS the primary faunal component of shell rings. We estimated the timing of oyster harvest at Citation: Cannarozzi NR, Kowalewski M (2019) St. Catherines Shell Ring (Georgia, USA) by statistical modeling of size frequency distribu- Seasonal oyster harvesting recorded in a Late tions of the impressed odostome (Boonea impressa), a parasitic snail inadvertently gath- Archaic period shell ring. PLoS ONE 14(11): e0224666. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. ered by Archaic peoples with its oyster host. The odostome samples from three pone.0224666 archaeological excavation units were evaluated against resampling models based on Editor: Mario Novak, Institute for Anthropological monthly demographic data obtained for present-day populations of Boonea impressa. For Research, CROATIA all samples, the harvest was unlikely to start earlier than late fall and end later than late Received: June 10, 2019 spring, indicating that shell deposits at St.
    [Show full text]
  • FULL ACCOUNT FOR: Boonea Bisuturalis Global Invasive Species Database (GISD) 2021. Species Profile Boonea Bisuturalis. Available
    FULL ACCOUNT FOR: Boonea bisuturalis Boonea bisuturalis System: Marine Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Animalia Mollusca Gastropoda Heterostropha Pyrmidellidae Common name two-groove odostome (English) Synonym Odostimia bisuturalis , (Say, 1822) Turritella bisuturalis , (Say, 1822) Similar species Summary Boonea bisuturalis is native to the St. Lawrence River and the northwest Atlantic coast. It primarily feeds on other molluscs and grasses. It is an extoparisitic species and feeds on internal parts of its prey. It can be found under rocks at the line of low tide. B. bisuturalis has been introduced further south to the Gulf of Mexico and San Francisco. This species has been introduced to Califonia through contaminated oyster stock. view this species on IUCN Red List Species Description Boonea bisuturalis has a small shell that is ovate and conical. The shell is whitish with a single revolving line between the suture. The surface is smooth with five or six whorls and a distinct line revolves just before the suture. The whorl at the bottom is larger than the other whorls; it makes up about half the shell's length. B. bisuturalis has a bluish-white pillar lip that is smooth and rounded. Within the shell there is a lip that is turned outwards, which produces an umbililcal chink. The length is 5.08mm and the width is 2.54mm (Gould, 1870). Notes Boonea bisuturalis is an ectoparasitic snail (Ray, 2005), which means that it lives outside its hosts body and feeds on its internal fluids and tissue. Habitat Description Boonea bisuturalis is most commonly found \"below the line of low tide, adhered to rocks\" (García-Cubas et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Epifaunal Community Structure on Artificial Reefs in Tampa Bay
    T The Epifaunal Community Structure on Artificial Reefs in Tampa Bay Grant Agreement #FWCC-03045 Thomas L. Dix, Ph.D., Thomas M. Ash, David J. Karlen, Barbara K. Goetting, Christina M. Holden, Susan M. Estes, June 2005 #FWCC-0304 5 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding was provided by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (Grant Agreement # FWCC-03045). Stephen A .Grabe, Sara E. Markham and Anthony S. Chacour assisted with sample processing. Carla Wright assisted with instrument calibration. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................... ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................................. iv LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................................. v ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 2 METHODS AND MATERIALS ............................................................................................................. 3 Study sites .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]