DOCSLIB.ORG

Specific Objective 2 Sov 6 Paulus Et Al. 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Specific Objective 2 Sov 6 Paulus Et Al. 2016 SoV 2.6 REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA MINISTRY OF FISHERIES AND MARINE RESOURCES DIRECTORATE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Cruise Report No 1/2016 RV Mirabilis Surveys of the Hake Stocks Survey No. 2016901: 11 January – 21 February 2016 Compiled by S. Paulus, Johannes Kathena ,Tobias Endjambi, Ester Nangolo A. van der Plas & P. Kainge National Marine Information and Research Centre (NatMIRC) Swakopmund, 2016 1 Hake Research, Demersal Subdivision National Marine Information and Research Centre (NatMIRC) P.O. Box 912 Swakopmund Namibia 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ............................................................................................................................................. 5 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Background .............................................................................................................................. 6 1.2 Objectives ................................................................................................................................ 7 1.3 Participation ............................................................................................................................. 7 1.4 Narrative .................................................................................................................................. 8 2. Materials and Methods ................................................................................................................ 10 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 10 2.2 Trawl and vessel equipment .................................................................................................. 10 2.3 Survey design ........................................................................................................................ 11 2.4 Data recording ....................................................................................................................... 11 2.5 Data analysis .......................................................................................................................... 12 2.5.1 Biomass estimates……………………………………………………………………….12 2.5.2 Species Distribution……………………………………………………………………..13 2.5.3 Size composition………………………………………………………………………...13 2.5.4 Recruitment estimates………………………………………………………………...…13 2.5.6 Hydrography…………………………………………………………………………….14 3. Results and Discussion? ...................................................................................................... ……15 3.1 Biomass estimates .................................................................................................................. 15 3.2 Species distribution ................................................................................................................ 18 3.3 Size composition .................................................................................................................... 20 3.4 Recruitment estimates ............................................................................................................ 22 3.5 Some Biological parameters .................................................................................................. 23 3.6 Environmental parameters ..................................................................................................... 25 4. Survey trends of some by-catch species (1990-2016) ................................................................. 28 4.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 28 4.2 Kingklip ................................................................................................................................. 29 4.3 West Coast Sole ..................................................................................................................... 30 4.4 Dentex .................................................................................................................................... 31 4.5 Angel Fish (Atlantic Pomfret) ............................................................................................... 32 4.6 Horse Mackerel ...................................................................................................................... 33 4.7 Jacopever ............................................................................................................................... 34 4.8 Cape Monk ............................................................................................................................ 35 4.9 Snoek ..................................................................................................................................... 36 4.10 Flying Squid ........................................................................................................................ 37 4.11 Alfonsino ............................................................................................................................. 38 4.12 Cape Gurnard ....................................................................................................................... 39 4.13 Deep-sea Red Crab .............................................................................................................. 40 5. Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................... 42 6. Literature cited ............................................................................................................................ 43 Appendix 1 – Trawl configuration .................................................................................................. 45 Appendix 2 – Areas ......................................................................................................................... 46 Appendix 3 – Gonad maturity stages classifications. ...................................................................... 46 Appendix 4 – Biomass estimates for the hakes since 1990. ............................................................ 47 Appendix 5 – Specifications for the vessel used in the research surveys of hake ........................... 48 Appendix 6 – List of survey stations and catch compositions (kg/hr) ............................................ 49 Appendix 7- Intercalibration Report ............................................................................................... 76 3 4 Abstract The research vessel (RV) Mirabilis was used to conduct the hake swept-area biomass survey from the 11th of January until the 21st of February 2016. A total of 216 trawl stations were conducted during the survey, covering the bottom depths between 88 and 682 m. The total hake biomass decreased by 10% (1 115 000 to 1 109 000 tonnes) between January/February 2015 survey and January/February 2016 survey. The non-fishable biomass has increased by 2%, while the fishable biomass decreased by 32%. The total biomass index of M. capensis decreased by 1.8% from 839 000 to 824 000 tonnes between 2015 and the 2016 estimates and its non-fishable biomass has increased by 17% while the fishable biomass has decreased by 36%. The total biomass of M. paradoxus has decreased by 33% (from 276 000 to 185 000 tonnes). The fishable biomass of that species has decreased by 15% and the non-fishable also decreased by 43%. The recruitment of M. capensis detected during the 2016 survey (the 2014 year class) were around 6.6 billion fish, above the long-term average. Areas of high density concentrations for M. capensis (>30 t/NM2) were found almost along the whole Namibian coast, except south of south of 28°S. The deep-water hake (M. paradoxus) was found in the deeper waters, with highest concentrations of densities (>30 t/NM2) found around Lüderitz and around Mowe Bay and Ambrose Bay. Intercalibration results showed that the catches for M.paradoxus were similar between the two vessels whereas Mirabilis caught more M.capensis overall because of two very large catches. Test for differences between length frequencies showed there were significant differences but for very low p-values, M.capensis (p = 4.134e-08) and M.paradoxus (p= 0.006512). The oceanographic conditions during the January/February 2016 hake survey reflected strong surface warming due to the generally weak southerly winds as well as strong summer insolation. Bottom temperatures over the shelf were also warmer than average in the north but average over the southern Namibian shelf for the summer period. The bottom low-oxygen waters were widespread over the inner shelf of most of the Namibian coastline and even impinged onto the outer shelf region. 5 1. Introduction 1.1 Background Namibian hake biomass surveys have been conducted since 1990. Up to 1999, the Norwegian research vessel, Dr. Fridtjof Nansen (Nansen), was used to conduct these surveys. In 1998 and 1999, the Nansen and Namibian commercial trawlers did parallel surveys, using the same trawl gears and applying the same methods, in order to enable inter-calibration between the commercial trawlers and the Nansen time series data. Namibia took over the responsibilities for conducting the hake biomass surveys with commercial vessels, as from 2000 (Table 1.1). Inter-calibration, through parallel trawling, between commercial vessels and Nansen were carried out each time a new commercial vessel
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cephalopoda: Sepiidae) Ott the South Coast of Southern Africa *
    S. Afr. I. Zool. 1993,28(2) 99 Biological and ecological aspects of the distribution of Sepia australis (Cephalopoda: Sepiidae) otT the south coast of southern Africa * Martina A. Compagno Roeleveld ** South African Museum, P.O. Box 61, Cape Town, 8000 Republic of South Africa M.R. Lipinski *** Zoology Department, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, 7700 South Africa Michelle G. van der Merwe South African Museum, P.O. Box 61, Cape Town, 8000 South Africa Received 9 June 1992; accepted 6 October 1992 During the South Coast Biomass Survey in 1988, 49,4 kg (6336 individuals) of Sepia australis were caught between Cape Agulhas and Algoa Bay. A biomass index of 803 t of S. australis was calculated for the area at that time. Largest catches were taken between about 20"E and 22"E, in waters of 10-11°C and 50-150 m depth. The overall sex ratio was 2M: 3F and mean individual mass was 6,47 9 for males and 8,67 9 for females. The largest animals were a mature male of 58 mm mantle length and a maturing female of 65 mm mantle length. Most of the animals trawled off the South Coast were maturing or fully mature in early winter and very few immature animals were found. Differences in mean mantle length and maturity stage of the animals in different areas were found to be correlated most strongly with water temperature but also with depth and longitude. Largest numbers and mean sizes of mature animals caught suggest that the main spawning grounds off the South Coast may be in deeper water on the western side of the Agulhas Bank.
    [Show full text]
  • TNP SOK 2011 Internet
    GARDEN ROUTE NATIONAL PARK : THE TSITSIKAMMA SANP ARKS SECTION STATE OF KNOWLEDGE Contributors: N. Hanekom 1, R.M. Randall 1, D. Bower, A. Riley 2 and N. Kruger 1 1 SANParks Scientific Services, Garden Route (Rondevlei Office), PO Box 176, Sedgefield, 6573 2 Knysna National Lakes Area, P.O. Box 314, Knysna, 6570 Most recent update: 10 May 2012 Disclaimer This report has been produced by SANParks to summarise information available on a specific conservation area. Production of the report, in either hard copy or electronic format, does not signify that: the referenced information necessarily reflect the views and policies of SANParks; the referenced information is either correct or accurate; SANParks retains copies of the referenced documents; SANParks will provide second parties with copies of the referenced documents. This standpoint has the premise that (i) reproduction of copywrited material is illegal, (ii) copying of unpublished reports and data produced by an external scientist without the author’s permission is unethical, and (iii) dissemination of unreviewed data or draft documentation is potentially misleading and hence illogical. This report should be cited as: Hanekom N., Randall R.M., Bower, D., Riley, A. & Kruger, N. 2012. Garden Route National Park: The Tsitsikamma Section – State of Knowledge. South African National Parks. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................2 2. ACCOUNT OF AREA........................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Effects on Cephalopod Population Dynamics: Implications for Management of Fisheries
    Advances in Cephalopod Science:Biology, Ecology, Cultivation and Fisheries,Vol 67 (2014) Provided for non-commercial research and educational use only. Not for reproduction, distribution or commercial use. This chapter was originally published in the book Advances in Marine Biology, Vol. 67 published by Elsevier, and the attached copy is provided by Elsevier for the author's benefit and for the benefit of the author's institution, for non-commercial research and educational use including without limitation use in instruction at your institution, sending it to specific colleagues who know you, and providing a copy to your institution’s administrator. All other uses, reproduction and distribution, including without limitation commercial reprints, selling or licensing copies or access, or posting on open internet sites, your personal or institution’s website or repository, are prohibited. For exceptions, permission may be sought for such use through Elsevier's permissions site at: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissionusematerial From: Paul G.K. Rodhouse, Graham J. Pierce, Owen C. Nichols, Warwick H.H. Sauer, Alexander I. Arkhipkin, Vladimir V. Laptikhovsky, Marek R. Lipiński, Jorge E. Ramos, Michaël Gras, Hideaki Kidokoro, Kazuhiro Sadayasu, João Pereira, Evgenia Lefkaditou, Cristina Pita, Maria Gasalla, Manuel Haimovici, Mitsuo Sakai and Nicola Downey. Environmental Effects on Cephalopod Population Dynamics: Implications for Management of Fisheries. In Erica A.G. Vidal, editor: Advances in Marine Biology, Vol. 67, Oxford: United Kingdom, 2014, pp. 99-233. ISBN: 978-0-12-800287-2 © Copyright 2014 Elsevier Ltd. Academic Press Advances in CephalopodAuthor's Science:Biology, personal Ecology, copy Cultivation and Fisheries,Vol 67 (2014) CHAPTER TWO Environmental Effects on Cephalopod Population Dynamics: Implications for Management of Fisheries Paul G.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Surveys of the Fish Resources of Namibia
    ANNEX II RECORDS OF FISHING STATIONS R/V "DR. FRIDTJOF NANSEN" SURVEY:1991401 STATION: 501 DATE :27/01/1991 GEAR TYPE: BT NO: 1 POSITION:Lat S 28°40.02 R/V "DR. FRIDTJOF NANSEN" SURVEY:1991401 STATION: 505 start stop duration Lon E 16°13.98 DATE :27/01/1991 GEAR TYPE: BT NO: 1 POSITION:Lat S 29°22.98 TIME :07:00:00 07:30:00 30.0 (min) Purpose : 3 start stop duration Lon E 14°51.00 LOG : 3992.20 3993.40 1.5 Region : 1 TIME :18:20:00 18:30:00 10.0 (min) Purpose : 3 FDEPTH: 81 78 Gear cond.: 0 LOG : 4073.60 4073.80 0.2 Region : 1 BDEPTH: 81 78 Validity : 0 FDEPTH: 237 235 Gear cond.: 8 Towing dir: 138° Wire out : 400 m Speed : 3.0 kn BDEPTH: 237 235 Validity : 9 Sorted : 70 Total catch: 69.80 Catch/hour: 139.60 Towing dir: 248° Wire out : 850 m Speed : 0.3 kn Sorted : 58 Total catch: 58.00 Catch/hour: 348.00 SPECIES CATCH/HOUR % OF TOT. C SAMP weight numbers SPECIES CATCH/HOUR % OF TOT. C SAMP Chelidonichthys capensis 67.80 360 48.57 weight numbers Merluccius capensis, female 23.00 122 16.48 2 Lepidopus caudatus 159.60 1752 45.86 Krill 20.00 0 14.33 Helicolenus dactylopterus 67.80 636 19.48 18 Callorhinchus capensis 8.60 10 6.16 Merluccius capensis, female 58.20 24 16.72 17 Jasus lalandii 5.00 46 3.58 Zeus capensis 37.80 252 10.86 Merluccius capensis, male 4.60 24 3.30 1 Callorhinchus capensis 15.00 6 4.31 Austroglossus microlepis 4.20 26 3.01 Todarodes sagittatus 6.60 6 1.90 Sufflogobius bibarbatus 3.20 450 2.29 Callanthias legras 1.80 12 0.52 Merluccius capensis, juvenile 3.20 150 2.29 3 Holohalaelurus regani 1.20 6 0.34 Trachurus capensis 0.00 2 0.00 __________ ________ Etrumeus whiteheadi 0.00 42 0.00 Total 348.00 100.00 Engraulis capensis 0.00 6 0.00 __________ ________ Total 139.60 100.00 R/V "DR.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology and Fisheries of the Shallow-Water Hake (Merluccius Capensis) and the Deep-Water Hake (M
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283086142 Biology and fisheries of the shallow-water hake (Merluccius capensis) and the deep-water hake (M. paradoxus) in Namibia Chapter · October 2015 DOI: 10.1002/9781118568262.ch3 CITATIONS READS 8 870 7 authors, including: Margit R. Wilhelm Carola Heidrun Kirchner University of Namibia Independent Fisheries consultant 23 PUBLICATIONS 106 CITATIONS 38 PUBLICATIONS 434 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Jean-Paul Roux Astrid Jarre University of Cape Town University of Cape Town 71 PUBLICATIONS 2,254 CITATIONS 115 PUBLICATIONS 3,048 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Identification of ecto- and endo-parasites of mariculture potential candidate, Namibian Silver Kob (Argyrosomus inodorus) View project NansClim programme View project All content following this page was uploaded by Margit R. Wilhelm on 10 October 2017. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. To cite as follows: Wilhelm, M.R., Kirchner, C.H., Roux, J.-P., Jarre, A., Iitembu, J.A., 70 Kathena, J.N. and Kainge, P. 2015. Biology and fisheries of the shallow-water hake (Merluccius capensis) and the deep-water hake (M. paradoxus) in Namibia. Chapter 3 In: Hakes: biology and exploitation, pp 70-100. Ed. by H. Arancibia. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: Chichester, UK. DOI: 10.1002/9781118568262.ch3 Chapter 3 Biology and fisheries of the shallow-water hake (Merluccius capensis) and the deep- water hake (M. paradoxus) in Namibia Wilhelm, M. R.1, 6, Kirchner, C. H.2, Roux, J-P.3, 4, Jarre, A.1, Iitembu, J.
    [Show full text]
  • Intrinsic Vulnerability in the Global Fish Catch
    The following appendix accompanies the article Intrinsic vulnerability in the global fish catch William W. L. Cheung1,*, Reg Watson1, Telmo Morato1,2, Tony J. Pitcher1, Daniel Pauly1 1Fisheries Centre, The University of British Columbia, Aquatic Ecosystems Research Laboratory (AERL), 2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada 2Departamento de Oceanografia e Pescas, Universidade dos Açores, 9901-862 Horta, Portugal *Email: [email protected] Marine Ecology Progress Series 333:1–12 (2007) Appendix 1. Intrinsic vulnerability index of fish taxa represented in the global catch, based on the Sea Around Us database (www.seaaroundus.org) Taxonomic Intrinsic level Taxon Common name vulnerability Family Pristidae Sawfishes 88 Squatinidae Angel sharks 80 Anarhichadidae Wolffishes 78 Carcharhinidae Requiem sharks 77 Sphyrnidae Hammerhead, bonnethead, scoophead shark 77 Macrouridae Grenadiers or rattails 75 Rajidae Skates 72 Alepocephalidae Slickheads 71 Lophiidae Goosefishes 70 Torpedinidae Electric rays 68 Belonidae Needlefishes 67 Emmelichthyidae Rovers 66 Nototheniidae Cod icefishes 65 Ophidiidae Cusk-eels 65 Trachichthyidae Slimeheads 64 Channichthyidae Crocodile icefishes 63 Myliobatidae Eagle and manta rays 63 Squalidae Dogfish sharks 62 Congridae Conger and garden eels 60 Serranidae Sea basses: groupers and fairy basslets 60 Exocoetidae Flyingfishes 59 Malacanthidae Tilefishes 58 Scorpaenidae Scorpionfishes or rockfishes 58 Polynemidae Threadfins 56 Triakidae Houndsharks 56 Istiophoridae Billfishes 55 Petromyzontidae
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Faunal Assessment Concessions 2C-5C
    BASIC ASSESSMENT FOR A PROSPECTING RIGHT APPLICATION FOR OFFSHORE SEA CONCESSION 6C WEST COAST, SOUTH AFRICA Marine Faunal Assessment Prepared for: On behalf of: De Beers Consolidated Mines Limited July 2018 BASIC ASSESSMENT FOR A PROSPECTING RIGHT APPLICATION FOR OFFSHORE SEA CONCESSION 6C WEST COAST, SOUTH AFRICA MARINE FAUNAL ASSESSMENT Prepared for SLR Consulting (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd On behalf of: De Beers Consolidated Mines Limited Prepared by Andrea Pulfrich Pisces Environmental Services (Pty) Ltd July 2018 Contact Details: Andrea Pulfrich Pisces Environmental Services PO Box 302, McGregor 6708, South Africa, Tel: +27 21 782 9553 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.pisces.co.za IMPACTS ON MARINE FAUNA – Proposed Offshore Prospecting Operations in Sea Concession 6C, West Coast, South Africa TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION ................................................................................ 1 1.1. Scope of Work ................................................................................... 1 1.2. Approach to the Study.......................................................................... 2 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT ............................................................ 3 2.1. Geophysical Surveys ............................................................................ 3 2.2. Exploration Sampling ........................................................................... 4 2.2.1 Coring (vibrocoring) .................................................................. 4 2.2.2
    [Show full text]
  • Specific Objective 1 Sov 3 Ross-Gillespie Phd 2016
    SoV 1.3 Modelling cannibalism and inter-species predation for the Cape hake species Merluccius capensis and M. paradoxus Andrea Ross-Gillespie A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University inof the Cape Town Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics University of Cape Town May 2016 Supervisor: Douglas S. Butterworth The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University of Cape Town Declaration of Authorship I know the meaning of plagiarism and declare that all of the work in the thesis, save for that which is properly acknowledged (including particularly in the Acknowledgements section that follows), is my own. Special men- tion is made of the model underlying the equations presented in Chapter 4, which was developed by Rademeyer and Butterworth (2014b). I declare that this thesis has not been submitted to this or any other university for a degree, either in the same or different form, apart from the model underlying the equations presented in Chapter 4, an earlier version of which formed part of the PhD thesis of R. Rademeyer in 2012. ii Acknowledgements Undertaking a PhD is as much an emotional challenge and test of character as it is an intellectual pursuit. I definitely could not have done it without the support of a multitude of family, friends and colleagues.
    [Show full text]
  • First Study on the Ecology of Sepia Australis in the Southern Benguela Ecosystem
    THE VELIGER © CMS, Inc., 1992 The Veliger 35(4):384-395 (October 1, 1992) First Study on the Ecology of Sepia australis in the Southern Benguela Ecosystem by M. R. LIPINSKl 1 Zoology Depanment. Cni\ersity of Cape Town, Ronclebosch 7700. South Africa .\1. A. COMPAGNO ROELEVELD South African .\luseurn. P.O. Box 61, Cape Town 8000, South Africa and C. J. AUGUSTYN Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Private Bag X2, Roggebaai 8012, South .-\frica Abstract. Sepia austra/1s is most abundant in the eastern South :\tlantic between Luderitz and St. Helena Bay (about 27-33°5 in 100-200 rn). There seerns to be no link between the variation in abundance of S. australls and that of its most important predator, the shallow-water Cape hake, Merluccius capensls. The variations in abundance of S. austra/ls and one of its rnost important prey species, the stomat0pod crustacean Pterygosquilla armata caper/j/s, sho\,· simultaneous changes, suggesting that both species respond to the same environmemal factors. I\lantle length. total weight. gonad \,·eight, and sex ratio of Sepia australi, \·ary from year to year ancl by region off the west coast of southern .'\frica ..-\nimals from the south coast (eastward of Cape Point) were very different: length-\,·eight relationships \,·ere found tO be sirnilar in slope and intercept for both f sexes and within each sex bet\,·een years and regions of the west coast, but different for the south coast. INTRODUCTIO'.\ dorsal rnantle length (.\!L) slightly above 80 mm. Little is known about this species other than its systematic po­ Sepia auslrali, is one of the most common sepiids in the sition and distribution range; its importance in the eco­ Benguela ecosystem of southern Africa (in this instance system is only now being assessed (LIPINSKI et al., 1991, from Luderitz to Agulhas Bank, Figure 1; for definitions and unpublished data; Roeleveld et al., unpublished data).
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Size Selectivity Between Marine Mammals and Commercial Fisheries with Recommendations for Restructuring Management Policies
    NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-AFSC-159 Comparison of Size Selectivity Between Marine Mammals and Commercial Fisheries with Recommendations for Restructuring Management Policies by M. A. Etnier and C. W. Fowler U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Alaska Fisheries Science Center October 2005 NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS The National Marine Fisheries Service's Alaska Fisheries Science Center uses the NOAA Technical Memorandum series to issue informal scientific and technical publications when complete formal review and editorial processing are not appropriate or feasible. Documents within this series reflect sound professional work and may be referenced in the formal scientific and technical literature. The NMFS-AFSC Technical Memorandum series of the Alaska Fisheries Science Center continues the NMFS-F/NWC series established in 1970 by the Northwest Fisheries Center. The NMFS-NWFSC series is currently used by the Northwest Fisheries Science Center. This document should be cited as follows: Etnier, M. A., and C. W. Fowler. 2005. Comparison of size selectivity between marine mammals and commercial fisheries with recommendations for restructuring management policies. U.S. Dep. Commer., NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-AFSC-159, 274 p. Reference in this document to trade names does not imply endorsement by the National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-AFSC-159 Comparison of Size Selectivity Between Marine Mammals and Commercial Fisheries with Recommendations for Restructuring Management Policies by M. A. Etnier and C. W. Fowler Alaska Fisheries Science Center 7600 Sand Point Way N.E. Seattle, WA 98115 www.afsc.noaa.gov U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Carlos M.
    [Show full text]
  • ASFIS ISSCAAP Fish List February 2007 Sorted on Scientific Name
    ASFIS ISSCAAP Fish List Sorted on Scientific Name February 2007 Scientific name English Name French name Spanish Name Code Abalistes stellaris (Bloch & Schneider 1801) Starry triggerfish AJS Abbottina rivularis (Basilewsky 1855) Chinese false gudgeon ABB Ablabys binotatus (Peters 1855) Redskinfish ABW Ablennes hians (Valenciennes 1846) Flat needlefish Orphie plate Agujón sable BAF Aborichthys elongatus Hora 1921 ABE Abralia andamanika Goodrich 1898 BLK Abralia veranyi (Rüppell 1844) Verany's enope squid Encornet de Verany Enoploluria de Verany BLJ Abraliopsis pfefferi (Verany 1837) Pfeffer's enope squid Encornet de Pfeffer Enoploluria de Pfeffer BJF Abramis brama (Linnaeus 1758) Freshwater bream Brème d'eau douce Brema común FBM Abramis spp Freshwater breams nei Brèmes d'eau douce nca Bremas nep FBR Abramites eques (Steindachner 1878) ABQ Abudefduf luridus (Cuvier 1830) Canary damsel AUU Abudefduf saxatilis (Linnaeus 1758) Sergeant-major ABU Abyssobrotula galatheae Nielsen 1977 OAG Abyssocottus elochini Taliev 1955 AEZ Abythites lepidogenys (Smith & Radcliffe 1913) AHD Acanella spp Branched bamboo coral KQL Acanthacaris caeca (A. Milne Edwards 1881) Atlantic deep-sea lobster Langoustine arganelle Cigala de fondo NTK Acanthacaris tenuimana Bate 1888 Prickly deep-sea lobster Langoustine spinuleuse Cigala raspa NHI Acanthalburnus microlepis (De Filippi 1861) Blackbrow bleak AHL Acanthaphritis barbata (Okamura & Kishida 1963) NHT Acantharchus pomotis (Baird 1855) Mud sunfish AKP Acanthaxius caespitosa (Squires 1979) Deepwater mud lobster Langouste
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Microsatellite Markers in Cape Hakes, Merluccius
    Evaluating the resolution power of new microsatellites for species identification and stock delimitation in the Cape hakes Merluccius paradoxus and M. capensis (Teleostei: Merlucciidae) T. B. HOAREAU*, A. W. KLOPPER, S. M. R. DOS SANTOS, C. J. OOSTHUIZEN AND P. BLOOMER Molecular Ecology and Evolution Programme, Department of Genetics, University of Pretoria, Private bag X20, Hatfield, 0028, South Africa. *Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: Tel. +27 12 420 3871; Fax. +27 12 362 5327; email: [email protected] Abstract The utility of 15 new and 17 previously published microsatellite markers was evaluated for species identification and stock delimitation in the deep-water hake Merluccius paradoxus and the shallow-water hake Merluccius capensis. A total of 14 microsatellites was polymorphic in M. paradoxus and 10 in M. capensis. Two markers could individually discriminate the species using Bayesian clustering methods and a statistical power analysis showed that the set of markers for each species is likely to detect subtle genetic differentiation (FST < 0.006), which will be valuable to delimit and characterise genetic stocks. Key words: Bayesian methods; cross-species amplification; genetic markers; genomic library; power analysis 1 Both the shallow-water hake Merluccius capensis Castelnau, 1861 and the deep-water hake M. paradoxus Franca, 1960 are targeted by a valuable demersal fishery along the west coasts of Southern Africa (>100 million USD annually; Butterworth & Rademeyer, 2005), but the intensification of exploitation over recent decades caused a resource decline (Payne & Punt, 1995). Due to their morphological similarity and overlapping distribution, the two species are not distinguished in the commercial landings records (von der Heyden et al., 2007b) and they are combined into geographic managements units, namely Namibia, west coast and south coast of South Africa (Butterworth & Rademeyer, 2005).
    [Show full text]