DOCSLIB.ORG

Milton Marks Auditorium California State Building 455 Golden Gate Ave. San Francisco, CA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Milton Marks Auditorium California State Building 455 Golden Gate Ave. San Francisco, CA AGENDA Tuesday, August 18, 2015 10:00 a.m. Milton Marks Auditorium California State Building 455 Golden Gate Ave. San Francisco, CA Note: Each member of the public will be allotted no more than 3 minutes to speak on each item. 1. Call to Order and Introductions. 2. Public Comment on Any Item Listed Below as for “Discussion Only.” 3. Review and Adoption of Meeting Minutes of June 23, 2015 (discussion & possible action). 4. Staff Report on Activities of the Reentry Council and its Subcommittees (discussion & possible action). a. Staff updates b. Subcommittee updates 5. Regular Update on Legislation and Funding Related to Reentry (discussion only). 6. Regular Update on Activities of the Juvenile Justice Coordinating Council, Sentencing Commission, Collaborative Courts, and Community Corrections Partnership (discussion only). 7. Follow-Up on Justice Reinvestment Initiative (discussion & possible action). a. Lore Joplin, Consultant to Crime and Justice Institute: San Francisco’s Justice Reinvestment Initiative Phase II close out process and next steps b. Martin Krizay, Chief Deputy Adult Probation Officer: Risk-Based Probation Sentencing c. Lt. Dave Hardy, Unit Commander, and Ali Riker, Director of Programs, San Francisco Sheriff’s Department; and Will Leong, Executive Director, PreTrial Diversion Project: Microstrategies Data Bridge d. James Bell, Executive Director, W. Haywood Burns Institute: Next Steps on Addressing Racial and Ethnic Disparities Across the San Francisco Criminal Justice System 8. Council Members’ Comments, Questions, and Requests for Future Agenda Items (discussion only). 9. Public Comment on Any Item Listed Above, as well as Items not Listed on the Agenda. 10. Adjournment. Page 1 SUBMITTING WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENT TO THE REENTRY COUNCIL Persons who are unable to attend the public meeting may submit to the Reentry Council, by the time the proceedings begin, written comments regarding the subject of the meeting. These comments will be made a part of the official public record, and brought to the attention of the Reentry Council. Written comments should be submitted to: Karen Shain, Reentry Policy Planner, Adult Probation Department, 880 Bryant Street, Room 200, San Francisco, CA 94103, or via email: [email protected]. MEETING MATERIALS Copies of agendas, minutes, and explanatory documents are available through the Reentry Council’s website at http://sfreentry.com or by calling Karen Shain at (415) 553-1047 during normal business hours. The material can be FAXed or mailed to you upon request. ACCOMMODATIONS To obtain a disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, to participate in the meeting, please contact Karen Shain at [email protected] or (415) 553-1047 at least two business days before the meeting. TRANSLATION Interpreters for languages other than English are available on request. Sign language interpreters are also available on request. For either accommodation, please contact Karen Shain at [email protected] or (415) 553-1047 at least two business days before the meeting. CHEMICAL SENSITIVITIES To assist the City in its efforts to accommodate persons with severe allergies, environmental illness, multiple chemical sensitivity or related disabilities, attendees at public meetings are reminded that other attendees may be sensitive to various chemical based products. Please help the City accommodate these individuals. KNOW YOUR RIGHTS UNDER THE SUNSHINE ORDINANCE (Chapter 67 of the San Francisco Administrative Code) Government's duty is to serve the public, reaching its decisions in full view of the public. Commissions, boards, councils and other agencies of the City and County exist to conduct the people's business. This ordinance assures that deliberations are conducted before the people and that City operations are open to the people's review. Copies of the Sunshine Ordinance can be obtained from the Clerk of the Sunshine Task Force, the San Francisco Public Library, and on the City's web site at: www.sfgov.org/sunshine. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON YOUR RIGHTS UNDER THE SUNSHINE ORDINANCE OR TO REPORT A VIOLATION OF THE ORDINANCE, CONTACT THE SUNSHINE ORDINANCE TASK FORCE: Administrator Sunshine Ordinance Task Force City Hall, Room 244 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, San Francisco, CA 94102-4683. Telephone: (415) 554-7724 E-Mail: [email protected] CELL PHONES The ringing of and use of cell phones, pagers and similar sound-producing electronic devices are prohibited at this meeting. Please be advised that the Co-Chairs may order the removal from the meeting room of any person(s) responsible for the ringing or use of a cell phone, pager, or other similar sound-producing electronic devices. LOBBYIST ORDINANCE Individuals and entities that influence or attempt to influence local legislative or administrative action may be required by San Francisco Lobbyist Ordinance (SF Campaign and Governmental Conduct Code sections 2.100-2.160) to register and report lobbying activity. For more information about the Lobbyist Ordinance, please contact the Ethics Commission at 30 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 3900, San Francisco CA 94102, telephone (415) 581-2300, FAX (415) 581-2317, and web site http://www.sfgov.org/ethics/ Page 2 DRAFT MINUTES Tuesday, June 23, 2015 10:00 a.m. Milton Marks Auditorium California State Building 455 Golden Gate Ave. San Francisco, CA Members in Attendance: Public Defender Jeff Adachi (co-chair), Cristine Soto DeBerry (alternate for District Attorney George Gascón, co-chair), Chief Karen Fletcher (co-chair), Paul Henderson (alternate for Mayor Edwin Lee, co-chair), Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi, (co-chair), Greg Asay (alternate for Michael Carr), Noel Belton (alternate for Chief Yador Harrell), Joseph Calderon, Kim Courtney, Joyce Crum (alternate for Trent Rhorer), Armel Farnsworth (alternate for Steve Lin), Omorede Rico Hamilton, Paula Hernandez (alternate for Chief Allen Nance), Ernest Kirkwood, Commander Robert Moser (alternate for Chief Gregory Suhr), Craig Murdock (alternate for Jo Robinson), Maria Su Members Absent: Dominique Leslie, Leslie Levitas, Keenia Williams 1. Call to Order and Introductions. At 10:06 am, Jeff Adachi called the meeting to order and welcomed the public and the Council. He acknowledged the co-chairs and asked other members to introduce themselves. 2. Public Comment on Any Item Listed Below as for “Discussion Only.” Mr. Adachi invited members of the public to review the agenda and speak on any agenda item. There were no comments. 3. Review and Adoption of Meeting Minutes of March 24, 2015 (discussion & possible action). Mr. Adachi asked members to review the minutes from the last meeting. He asked for any comments from council members and upon hearing none, asked for a motion to approve the minutes. Ross Mirkarimi motioned, Kim Courtney seconded. There was no public comment and the motion carried at 10:13. 4. Staff Report on Activities of the Reentry Council and its Subcommittees (discussion & possible action). Mr. Adachi asked Karen Shain of the Adult Probation Department to provide an update on the activities of the Council and its subcommittees. Karen introduced Lore Joplin, who is the technical assistant for the current Justice Reinvestment Initiative project. Lore took the Council through an overview of the three strategies and explained them as: (1) Elimination of racial and ethnic disparities, (2) Early termination of probation supervision terms, and (3) Expansion of pretrial strategies. Ms. Joplin introduced Jessie Warner who offered an update to the Council on probation terms. She explained that substantial progress has been made to use a risk-based probation sentencing protocol. Beginning May 4, 2015, the new protocol ties probation terms to risk assessment, using COMPAS. Currently, meetings are being held with the hope of extending early termination to current probationers. She acknowledged the interagency work group consisting of the courts, Adult Probation, district attorney, Page 3 public defender, and members of the defense panel, which have been working to develop and roll out the protocol. Beyond this, the group is looking at possible changes to misdemeanor sentencing. Nancy Campbell, from Justice System Partners spoke about pretrial and the pretrial safety assessment (PSA). She explained that they have been looking at developing tools which use risk to determine outcomes. The Arnold Foundation has agreed to look at San Francisco and answer the question: Is change needed? She explained that they found it is not only needed but would be extremely beneficial to the city. San Francisco is known to be complex, highly collaborative, and innovative. PSA is a non-interview, highly predictive tool and by using it in San Francisco, the city could potentially double number of defendants reviewed for OR. It would be a more efficient way to screen and allow access for more people to be released pretrial. Furthermore, PSA will tell judges the potential risk of failure to appear and commission of a new crime, and then combined with decision making framework will allow the courts to consider changes. Next steps: work group to help us proceed. Providing technical assistance for OR. Karen Shain then reiterated that there is a pending JRI application for Phase III and the current JRI comes to an end at the end of August. She stated that the Reentry Council has applied for a Phase III grant and further reminded the audience of the overall purpose of JRI – which is to identify the drivers of disproportionality and to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • William Newsom POLITICS, LAW, and HUMAN RIGHTS
    Regional Oral History Office University of California The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California William Newsom POLITICS, LAW, AND HUMAN RIGHTS Interviews conducted by Martin Meeker in 2008-2009 Copyright © 2009 by The Regents of the University of California Since 1954 the Regional Oral History Office has been interviewing leading participants in or well-placed witnesses to major events in the development of Northern California, the West, and the nation. Oral History is a method of collecting historical information through tape-recorded interviews between a narrator with firsthand knowledge of historically significant events and a well-informed interviewer, with the goal of preserving substantive additions to the historical record. The tape recording is transcribed, lightly edited for continuity and clarity, and reviewed by the interviewee. The corrected manuscript is bound with photographs and illustrative materials and placed in The Bancroft Library at the University of California, Berkeley, and in other research collections for scholarly use. Because it is primary material, oral history is not intended to present the final, verified, or complete narrative of events. It is a spoken account, offered by the interviewee in response to questioning, and as such it is reflective, partisan, deeply involved, and irreplaceable. ********************************* All uses of this manuscript are covered by a legal agreement between The Regents of the University of California and William Newsom, dated August 7, 2009, and Barbara Newsom, dated September 22, 2009 (by her executor), and Brennan Newsom, dated November 12, 2009. The manuscript is thereby made available for research purposes. All literary rights in the manuscript, including the right to publish, are reserved to The Bancroft Library of the University of California, Berkeley.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral History Interview with Milton Marks
    CALIFORNIA SHU ~lCllnS California State Archives State Government Oral History Program Oral History Interview with MILTON MARKS California State Assembly 1958-1966 California State Senate 1967-1996 January 23, 1996, January 24, 1996, January 25, 1996, February 27, 1996, February 28, 1996 Sacramento, California By Donald B. Seney California State Archives Volume Two SESSION 4, January 25, 1996 [Tape 6, Side A] 211 Winston Churchill--Travels--Interests in Environmental issues--Local Government Issues--BART--Working with Senator Moscone--More about BART­ -The question oflegislative pay--The mini-bus mobile office--The leadership battle in the Senate after 1970. [Tape 6, Side B] 230 The leadership battle in the Senate after 1970 election--Senator Randolph Collier­ -The Senate Rules Committee and Committee appointments--Changes in the Transportation Committee under James Mills--Other changes in Leadership-­ Schrade replaces Way--Mills replaces Schrade--George Deukmejian--Problems for Schrade--Gun Controllegislation--The Bay Conservation and Development Act--Farewell tribute when Senator Marks left Assembly--1970 Reapportionment­ -The 1972 Election. [Tape 7, Side A] 252 Senator Marks' relationship with Willie Brown--The 1972 Senate Campaign--The issues in the 1972 Campaign--A big victory in 1972--Mrs. Marks' Campaign for the Board of Supervisors--Mrs. Marks' contributions to Senator Marks' career-­ The perils oflisting address and phone number--The 1972 Election Generally-­ H.L. Richardson--Voting to override a Reagan veto. [Tape 7, Side B] 276 The Senator's Partisan Split after the 1972 election--The Indian Affairs Committee and the location ofthe Governor's Mansion--Legislation Sponsored by Senator Marks' from 1959 on--Open meeting legislation--Early environmental legislation--Financing Laws--Establishing the California Arts Commission-­ Legislation dealing with Treatment for alcoholism--Commission on the Status of Women--Other legislation--Legislation dealing with the disabled.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislators of California
    The Legislators of California March 2011 Compiled by Alexander C. Vassar Dedicated to Jane Vassar For everything With Special Thanks To: Shane Meyers, Webmaster of JoinCalifornia.com For a friendship, a website, and a decade of trouble-shooting. Senator Robert D. Dutton, Senate Minority Leader Greg Maw, Senate Republican Policy Director For providing gainful employment that I enjoy. Gregory P. Schmidt, Secretary of the Senate Bernadette McNulty, Chief Assistant Secretary of the Senate Holly Hummelt , Senate Amending Clerk Zach Twilla, Senate Reading Clerk For an orderly house and the lists that made this book possible. E. Dotson Wilson, Assembly Chief Clerk Brian S. Ebbert, Assembly Assistant Chief Clerk Timothy Morland, Assembly Reading Clerk For excellent ideas, intriguing questions, and guidance. Jessica Billingsley, Senate Republican Floor Manager For extraordinary patience with research projects that never end. Richard Paul, Senate Republican Policy Consultant For hospitality and good friendship. Wade Teasdale, Senate Republican Policy Consultant For understanding the importance of Bradley and Dilworth. A Note from the Author An important thing to keep in mind as you read this book is that there is information missing. In the first two decades that California’s legislature existed, we had more individuals serve as legislators than we have in the last 90 years.1 Add to the massive turnover the fact that no official biographies were kept during this time and that the state capitol moved seven times during those twenty years, and you have a recipe for missing information. As an example, we only know the birthplace for about 63% of the legislators. In spite of my best efforts, there are still hundreds of legislators about whom we know almost nothing.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum Watch Your Step
    Tree Trimmers YOUR To Start Business Manager's Negotiations CO LUMN Wage and contract bargaining will gaction policy commence on all agreements between Local 1245 and the tree trimming con- By Ronald T. Weakley tractors the first part of November, VOL. XVI, No. 5 OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA OCTOBER; 968 except for Pacific Tree Export Com- atlon of I.B.E.W. Local Union 1245, AFL-CIO, 1218 Boulevard Way, Walnut Creek, Calif., 94 At press time, your Business Man- pany where a three-year contract ex- ager, Ron Weakley, is on vacation. In ists. Wages only will be a subject for place of his column we wish to print later negotiations on the Pacific Tree a statement of policy regarding the properties under Article XVII, Section coming elections. 17.1(a) which provides for discussions STATEMENT OF POLICY RE- on wages beyond the pre-negotiated MEMORANDUM GARDING 1968 GENERAL increase by reason of the Consumer ELECTIONS Price Index exceeding 117.5 index The elected Officers of Local points in the months of September, October 1, 1968 1245 of the International Brother- October and November, 1968. To: Ronald T. Weakley and Staff hood of Electrical Workers, Ameri- Notices will be sent to Utility Tree can Federation of Labor-Congress Service, Inc., Farrens Tree Company, From: Executive Board of Industrial Organizations, do Inc., and Davey Tree Surgery Com- hereby set forth a Statement of pany, Ltd., together with the propo- The Executive Board wishes to extend to you and your Policy regarding the 1968 General sals following analysis of a member- Elections in the United States : ship survey now in progress.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommendations for Improving the School Facility Program in Los Angeles Unified School District
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 435 167 EF 005 632 AUTHOR Terzian, Richard R. TITLE Recommendations for Improving the School Facility Program in Los Angeles Unified School District. INSTITUTION Little Hoover Commission, Sacramento, CA. PUB DATE 1999-11-00 NOTE 20p. AVAILABLE FROM Milton Marks Commission on California State Government and Economy, 925 L. Street, Suite 805, California, CA 95814 ($5). Tel: 916-445-2125; E-mail: [email protected]; Fax: 916-322-7709; For full text: <http://www.lhc.ca.gov>. PUB TYPE Reports - Evaluative (142) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Administrator Effectiveness; Elementary Secondary Education; Enrollment; *Organizational Effectiveness; Planning; *Public Schools; Urban Schools IDENTIFIERS *Little Hoover Commission; *Los Angeles Unified School District CA; Reform Efforts ABSTRACT The Little Hoover Commission presents its findings on the State of California's school facilities program with a review of the practices of the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD). Thisreport on the LAUSD reveals that children in Los Angeles are currently doomedto overcrowded, uninspired, and unhealthy schools because of persistent incompetence by the LAUSD. It then describes these problems in detail addressing enrollment growth, personnel practices, organizationalstructure, and board competence. Immediate and long-term reforms of the LAUSDare discussed, followed by reform recommendations that should be initiated by the Governor and Legislature. An appendices presents a list of witnesses before the Little Hoover Cothmission public hearing. (GR) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best thatcan be made from the original document. State of California LITTLE HOOVER COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVING THE SCHOOL FACILITY PROGRAM IN LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT November 1999 M BEST COPY AVAILABLE U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • California State Government Project
    Alarcon, Arthur L. Oral History Interview with Arthur L. Alarcon. Interviewed by Carlos Vasquez 1988 Language: English Project: California State Government Status: Completed; 394 pages Abstract Alarcon discusses his family background, education, experience in the military, post-secondary education, and activities, events, and issues during his tenure in the Edmund G. Brown, Sr., administration from 1961-1964, in particular those relating to narcotics, capital punishment, extradition, clemency, and law enforcement. Alquist, Alfred E. Oral History Interview with Alfred Alquist. Interviewed by Gabrielle Morris and Donald B. Seney 1987 Language: English Project: California State Government Status: Completed; 182 pages Abstract The interview discusses Democratic party politics in Santa Clara County as well as statewide. He speaks about his election campaigns from 1960 through 1984, including his candidacy for Lt. Governor in 1970. He also discusses issues such as campaign spending, reapportionment, economic development, and the budgetary process, as well as personalities such as Governor Edmund G. Brown, Sr., John Vasconcellos, and others. It also includes comments by Administrative Assistant Loretta Riddle on Alquist's San Jose office. Alshuler, Robert E. Oral History Interview with Robert E. Alshuler. Interviewed by Dale E. Treleven 1991 Language: English Project: California State Government Status: Completed; 157 pages Abstract Alshuler discusses his family background, education in Los Angeles and at UCLA, student activities leadership, presidency of the UCLA Alumni Association, and business of the Regents of the University of California during his ex officio regency from 1961 to 1963. Babbage, John D. Oral History Interview with John D. Babbage. Interviewed by Enid Hart Douglass 1987 Language: English Project: California State Government Status: Completed; 145 pages Abstract The interview includes biographical background information: family, education, training as a lawyer, and work for the Federal Bureau of Investigation (1941-1946).
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Diversity Forum: the Threats and Risks of Extinction Senate Committee on Natural Resources and Wildlife
    Golden Gate University School of Law GGU Law Digital Commons California Senate California Documents 8-29-1989 Natural Diversity Forum: The Threats and Risks of Extinction Senate Committee on Natural Resources and Wildlife Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/caldocs_senate Part of the Environmental Law Commons, and the Legislation Commons Recommended Citation Senate Committee on Natural Resources and Wildlife, "Natural Diversity Forum: The Threats and Risks of Extinction" (1989). California Senate. Paper 156. http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/caldocs_senate/156 This Conference Proceeding is brought to you for free and open access by the California Documents at GGU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in California Senate by an authorized administrator of GGU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. rNI#\IJ(!)J~#\~ [p)O~~~~OIJW ~@~(!)J[M]~ IJOO ~ IJOO ~~A IJ~ ArM [p) ~a~~~ @~ ~iAIJOrNI~IJO@rNI TRANSCRIPT SENATE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES AND WILDLIFE Dan McCorquodale Chair State CapitoL Room 4203 August 29, 1989 453-S Cafijornia LegisCature se::a~;~~~fttittee ?{pttj;a! 'Wi¥Cife :;: . ~esoiBi~:d..··.·· .. ·· .. ··::;.-:·:·.=:::::·:=:=:::.:··:-; ....·:,.;::-:-·--:·:;.;:;:;:;:;.•:;:;:;:;:;.·--·. :--. 1 .... ::.,.,.,,· .. ~- ::::\::.):::}~~))]]1 !:~;~;;t~~.iiii;• ·.=•.•.=·:·.=··':.,•·.,i.,=· .. =• ..,•.... , ••·.·.,:.:•:i ..: !;;;·:·;·:·.=·.·•.;. > ..:: ·,.·.··.:P.'Ilo~i"'il ":>:;:;:-:;:;:;:-:;:;:;::::::::::;:::;:··; ,itfl~ .. ::::;:;·:;:;::::::::::-·:::::::-<:::>:-:-:-:-·-;.:-·-..·.~.e..~.~;;h:l6.··a::.r.'g
    [Show full text]
  • Brown Sues to Remove Farm Ballot Measure
    Assembly Committee Hearings ~. CRIMINAL INDICTMENTS PROMISED BY DISTRICT ATTORNEY LOS ANGELES, California -- Taking kers:" "It is very embarrassing to have, testimony from a number of prominent to admit this," said Verner, "especially state and county officials, includlng Cali­ with my very strong feelings on the sub­ fornia Secretary of State Edmund G. Brown, ject." Jr. and Los Angeles District 'Attorney Brown had several other witnesses avail­ joseph P. Busch, an Assembly Committee abe in the audience, and read from numer­ has uncovered widespread fraud in the ous letters and affidavits Citing decep­ certification of Proposition 22 for the tion similar to that experienced by the November 7 ballot. The Farm Bureau and other agribusiness interests have admitted spending over $240,{)00 in placing the measure on the ballot, and expect to spend even more in advertising during the closing weeks of the campaign, Illegal use of minors to secure signa­ tures, use of "dodger" cards and gross misrepresentation of fact were among the tactics exposed during hearings of the, Assembly Committee on Elections and Re­ apportionment in Los Angeles October 12. The most dramatic testimony during tfiectay-came -from Secretary of S~ate Edmund Brown, who earlier made an un­ successful attempt to have Proposition 22 removed from the ballot because of Secretary of State Edmund ,G. Brown, Jr. reads' several affidavits to the As­ the fraud he had uncovered. sembly Committee demonstrating that Proposition 22 !lad been fraudulently Brown showed the Committee NBC and qualified for the November 7 ballot. CBS film clips of Robert Walters of Amer­ ican Advertising and Sales, one of several public, relations firms paid to gain cer­ 1Lo~ .ang'tltlt ~intt~ Fri., Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • The Honorable Barbara Boxer Oral History Interview Final Edited
    The Honorable Barbara Boxer U.S. Representative of California (1983–1993) U.S. Senator of California (1993–2017) Oral History Interview Final Edited Transcript November 29, 2018 Office of the Historian U.S. House of Representatives Washington, D.C. “So without Anita having the courage of her convictions, and without those of us walking over, I never would have made it to the Senate ever because no one really knew in the country how few women there were. And I had many male supporters, who started off not supporting me, who when they saw the Senate said, ‘Oh my God, never realized there were so few women in the Senate. I’m going to back you and Dianne [Feinstein],’ because Dianne was running at the time. So it was, I would say, it was impactful is an understatement. Without that situation, I never would have made it. I just wouldn’t have.” Barbara Boxer November 29, 2018 Table of Contents Interview Abstract i Interviewee Biography ii Editing Practices iii Citation Information iii Interviewer Biographies iv Interview 1 Notes 35 Abstract At a young age, Barbara Boxer learned the importance of voting from her mother who was born before the ratification of the 19th Amendment in 1920. Boxer explains how the Vietnam War sparked her political and community activism and led her to work on campaigns, including George McGovern’s presidential run in 1972. In her interview she describes why she decided to run for local office—Marin County Board of Supervisors—and how she made the difficult choice to try again after losing her first bid.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Convention
    Proceedings and Reports 1974 Pre-Primary Election Convention of California Labor COPE AFL-CIO San Francisco, April 11, 1974 CALIFORNIA LABOR COUNCIL ON POLITICAL EDUCATION AFL-CIO John F. Henning, Secretary-Treasurer 995 Market Street, San Francisco 94103 _~' 151 Offieers of the California Labor Council on Political Education JOHN F. HENNING Executive Secretary-Treasurer ALBIN J. GRUHN President MANUEL DIAS General Vice President VICE PRESIDENTS, GEOGRAPHICAL District No. 1 District No. 8 Max J. Osslo Thomas A. Small District No. 2 District No. 9 M. R. Callahan Joseph R. Garcia Ray S. Mendoza Wm. G. Dowd District No. 3 District No. 10 Anthony J. Bogdanowicz Richard K. Groulx Chester L. Migden Lamar Childers John A. Cinquemani District No. 11 Kenneth D. Larson Leo Mitchell Joseph H. Seymour District No. 12 Ray M. Wilson Loretta Riley District No. 4 District No. 13 Paul Miller Harry Finks District No. 5 District No. 14 Bennie Arellano Raymond K. Nelson District No. 6 District No. 15 Manuel M. Lopez Lloyd J. Lea District No. 7 C. A. Green VICE PRESIDENTS, AT LARGE James P. McLoughlin Joseph P. Mazzola James B. Booe Steve Edney Edward T. Shedlock Fred D. Fletcher Sigmund Arywitz Frank S. McKee Hal Shean TABLE OF CONTENTS Proceedings of the 1974 Pre-Primary Convention - 3-23 EndorsementRecommendations................................................ 11-22 Report of the Secretary-Treasurer 24-30 Roll of Delegates .31-37 Membership Report .38-50 Report of the Auditors 561-66 PROCEEDINGS of the 1974 Pre*Primary Election Convention of the California Labor Council on Political Education AFL*CIO Thursday, April I1, 1974 Civic Auditorium San Francisco, California Call to Order leaders of intelligence and imagination.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral History Interview with Milton Marks
    California State Archives State Government Oral History Program Oral History Interview with MILTON MARKS California State Assembly 1958-1966 California State Senate 1967-1996 January 23, 1996, January 24, 1996, January 25, 1996, February 27, 1996, February 28, 1996 Sacramento, California By Donald B. Seney California State Archives Volume One TABLE OF CONTENTS INTERVIEW HISTORY i BIOGRAPHICAL SUMMARY 11 SESSION 1, January 23, 1996 [Tape 1, Side A] 1 Grandparents and Parents--The political career of Senator Marks' father-­ Memories of childhood--Milton Marks, Sr.'s career as a legislator and an attorney--Why the Marks family was Republican--Senator Marks' mother--Milton Marks, Sr.'s term on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors--Growing up in the Richmond District--Going to School--Acquiring political values--Attending Galileo High School--Stanford University. [Tape 1, Side B] 21 Stanford University--The coming ofWWII--Military Service--The Phillippines During the War--Serving as a legal officer--Japan at the end ofthe War--Retiring to the United States--The Great Depression. SESSION 2, January 24, 1996 [Tape 2, Side A] 43 Returning from World War II--Going back to Law School--Practicing law-­ Running for the Assembly in 1952 and later--Mrs. Caroline Marks--The 1958 Campaign for the Assembly--Senator William F. Knowland and the 1958 Election. [Tape 2, Side B] 65 Winning an Assembly seat in 1958--Senator Thomas H. Kuchel--The Republican Party turns conservative--The effect ofthe 1958 election in California on the Republican Party--Entering the Assembly--Governor Pat Brown--Being a Republican in San Francisco--The 1959 Legislative session and the Brown Open Meeting Act--Jesse M.
    [Show full text]
  • EXTENSIONS of REMARKS May 25, 1995 EXTENSIONS of REMARKS
    14632 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS May 25, 1995 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS OUR NATION'S FLAG who kept insisting that we should not and most feel that way now which is why "amend our Bill of Rights". What she appar­ those same Comrades want this Protection ently forgot was that those original Bill of Amendment passed. HON. GERALD B.H. SOLOMON Rights were the first ten Amendments to the I want to be heard in the Congressional OF NEW YORK original Constitution of 7 Articles and were Chambers but I cannot because I am not a IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES declared in force on Dec. 15, 1791. U.S. Senator or Congressman. Also, she would have done well, as should Thursday, May 25, 1995 However, I do represent millions of Ameri­ anyone against this Amendment, to read the cans who want this desecration stopped. Mr. SOLOMON. Mr. Speaker, yesterday preamble to that Bill of Rights. No Veteran was ever told that he would Honor those Comrades-in-Arms and those testified before the House Judiciary Committee Citizens who have a dedication to, and love on an amendment I am proposing to protect protect the Right of someone to urinate upon, burn or otherwise desecrate the Flag for, this Nation. our Nation's flag. This matter is very dear to he had sworn to protect and defend and I, personally, have walked over 400 miles my heart and to the hearts of many Ameri­ honor. holding the American Flag and have heard cans. The American flag always brings our na­ Senator Kerry feels that there is no need the cheers and cries of Americans who also tion together, rich or poor, in good times or to pass this Resolution because of the few in­ want their Flag Federally protected.
    [Show full text]