!" #$ ! $%$$ &' () * ( + ,-%
. % . & /0, 1 2 % 3 4 %. 4 ( ( % & ( 4 1 ( 1 5 % . & /0, 2 6 %3 ( 4 4 %7 ( 4 % . 4 8 1 (4 / 9 : !0% . 4 4 4 ( 1 ( 1 (9(; 21 % 4 4 %. 1 ( 1 ( 4 %
!
#$ ! <== %% = > ? << < < 9;;,$
3-"@!A@ !,9@@ ; 3-"@!A@ !,9@@ ##
"
( $,@
Ǧ
Ǧ
̹ǡ ʹͲͳ ǣSearchingfornewMo(CO)6reactions¡ ǣͻͺǦͻͳǦͶͻǦͻͳͳǦͷ ǣ ͻͺǦͻͳǦͶͻǦͻͳʹǦʹ Ǧǡ ʹͲͳ ǣ ǡ
Dz dz
Abstract
Ǥ Ǧ ȋȌǦ Ǧ Ǥ Ǧ Ǥ Ǧ ǡǡǤ ǡ ǡǦ ƲǤ ȋȌǦ Ǧ ȽǦǤ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ȋ Ͷ Ȃ ȌǤ in situ ǡ ǡ ǡ ͶǡͷǦ Ǥ NǦ Ǥ ǡ NǦ Ǧ ǡ Ǥ
Populärvetenskaplig Sammanfattning på Svenska
¡ Ú ¡ Ú Ǥ ¡ ÚÚ¤ ¡Ǥ ÚÚ Ú ¡ Ú¡Ǥ Ú ȋ ʹ ͵Ȍ ¤Ú ǡ Ǥ ¡ ¤ ¡¡ȋȌ ¡ ¡ Ǥ ¡ ¡ Ú ¡ ¡ ¡ Ú ¡Ǥ ȋ Ͷ Ȃ Ȍ ¡ÚǤ ¡¡ ¡ ¡Ǥ¤ ÚÚ ¤¡Ǥ
ListofPublications
ǡ ǦǤ Ǥ Ǥ
I. Chemoselective Reduction of Tertiary Amides under Thermal Control: Formation of either Aldehydes or Amines ǡȗ ǡ ȗ Angewandte Chemie International Editionǡ 2016ǡ 55ǡ ͶͷʹǦͶͷ II. Transformation of Amides into Highly Functionalized Triazolines ǡ ǡ ǡ ȗ ȗ ACSCatalysisǡ2017ǡ7ǡͳͳǦͳͷ III. Mild Reductive Functionalization of Amides into NǦSulfonylformamidines ǡ ǡ ȗ ȗ ChemistryOpenǡ2017ǡ6ǡͶͺͶǦͶͺ IV. An Efficient OneǦpot Procedure for the Direct Preparationof4,5ǦDihydroisoxazolesfromAmides ǡ ǡ ȗ ȗ AdvancedSynthesisandCatalysisǡ2017ǡ359ǡͳͻͻͲǦͳͻͻͷ V. Facile Preparation of Pyrimidinediones and Thioacrylamides by Reductive Functionalization of Amides ǡᑽ ǡᑽ ȗ ȗ ChemicalCommunicationsǡ2017ǡ53ǡͻͳͷͻǦͻͳʹ ᑽ Ǥ
Papersnotincludedaspartofthisthesis:
ChemoselectiveReductionofCarboxamides ǡᑽ ǡᑽǡȗ ǡ ȗ ChemicalSocietyReviewsǡ2016ǡ45ǡͺͷǦͻ ThirdǦGeneration Amino Acid FuranosideǦBased Ligands from ૌǦMannose for the Asymmetric Transfer Hydrogenation of Ketones:CatalystswithanExceptionallyWideSubstrateScope ° ǡǡ ǡ ǡȗ ±ȗ ȗ AdvancedSynthesis&Catalysisǡ2016ǡ358ǡͶͲͲǦͶͲͳͺ Bimetallic Catalysis: Asymmetric Transfer Hydrogenation of Sterically Hindered Ketones Catalyzed by Ruthenium and Potassium ǡ¡ ȗ ChemCatChemǡ2015ǡ7ǡ͵ͶͶͷǦ͵ͶͶͻ Mo(CO)6 Catalysed Chemoselective Hydrosilylation of Ƚ,ȾǦUnsaturatedAmidesfortheFormationofAllylamines ǡ ǡȗ ǡ ȗ ChemicalCommunicationsǡ2014ǡ50ǡͳͶͷͲͺǦͳͶͷͳͳ RutheniumǦCatalyzed TandemǦIsomerization/Asymmetric TransǦ ferHydrogenationofAllylicAlcohols ǡ ȗ ChemistryǦAEuropeanJournalǡ2014ǡ20ǡͳͳͲʹǦͳͳͲ Automated Annotation and Quantification of Metabolites in 1HNMRDataofBiologicalOrigin ǡ ǡ Ǥ %ǡ Úǡ AnalyticalandBioanalyticalChemistryǡ2012ǡ403ǡͶͶ͵ǦͶͷͷ ᑽ Ǥ
Contents
ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤ ¡¤ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤ ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤ ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤ ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤ ͳǤ ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤͳ ͳǤͳǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤͳ ͳǤʹ ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤʹ ͳǤʹǤͳǦ ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤ͵ ͳǤʹǤʹ ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤͶ ͳǤʹǤ͵ ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤͷ ͳǤʹǤͶ ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤ ͳǤʹǤͷ ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤͳͶ ͳǤ͵ ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤͳ ͳǤ͵Ǥͳ ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤͳ ͳǤ͵Ǥʹ ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤͳͻ ͳǤͶ ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤʹ͵ ʹǤ ȋ ȌǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤʹͷ ʹǤͳȂ ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤ͵ͳ ʹǤʹ ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤ͵ͳ ʹǤ͵ ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤ͵ʹ
͵ǤȋȌǦ ȋ ȂȌ ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤ͵͵ ͵Ǥͳ ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤ͵͵ ͵ǤʹǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤ͵ ͵Ǥ͵ ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤ͵ ͵ǤͶ ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤͶʹ
ͶǤ ȋ ȌǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤͶ͵ ͶǤͳ ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤͶ͵ ͶǤʹǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤͶͷ ͶǤ͵ ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤͷʹ ͷǤ NǦ ȋ ȌǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤͷ͵ ͷǤͳ ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤͷ͵ ͷǤʹǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤͷͶ ͷǤ͵ ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤͷͻ Ǥ ͶǡͷǦ ȋ ȌǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤͳ Ǥͳ ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤͳ ǤʹǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤ͵ Ǥ͵ ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤ Ǥ ȋȌǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤ Ǥͳ ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤ ǤʹǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤͺ Ǥ͵ ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤͶ ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤͷ ǣǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤ ǣǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤ ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤͺ ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤͺͳ
Abbreviations
Ǥͳ Ǥ
ͳǡʹǦȋȌ ʹǡʹ̵ǦȋȌǦͳǡͳ̵Ǧ ͳǡͷǦ ͳǡ͵ǦȋȌ ee ʹǦ ʹǦ ǡͳǡͶǦǦʹǡǦǦ ͵ǡͷǦ ʹǦ ʹǦ ǦǦ ʹǦ ʹǦ ʹǦǦ ʹǦ ʹǡʹǯǦȋȌǦͳǡͳǯǦ ȋȌ ȋȌ pǦ ͳǡͳǡ͵ǡ͵Ǧ ȋȌ
1.Introduction
ǯ Ǧ Ǥ Ǣ ǡǡǡǦ Ǥ Ǧ Ǧ Ǥ ǡ Ǧ Ǥ ǡ Ǧ Ǧ ǤʹǦ Ǧ Ǧ Ǧ Ǥ
1.1Amides
ǡ Ǥ͵ǡͶǡͷ Ǧ Ǥ Ȃ ǡ ȋ ͳȌǤǡ Ǧ Ǧ ǡ Ǥ
ͳ
Figure1.a)Theresonancestabilizationbythenitrogenlonepair,theoriginof thestability.b)Theorbitaloverlapthatcontributestotheplanarconformation oftheamides.c)Orderofstabilityfordifferentcarbonylcompounds.
Ǥ ǡ ǡ Ǥͺ NǦǡǦ ǡǤ͵Ǧ Ǧ ȋ ͳȌǤͻ
Scheme1.SubstitutionreactionofnonǦplanaramidewithmethanol.
1.2ReductionofAmides
Ǥ Ǧ ǡ ǡͳͲ ǡͳͳ ǡͳʹ ͳ͵ͳͶȋ ʹȌǤ ǡǦ Ǥ
ʹ
Scheme2.Differentproductsformedinthereductionofamidesthrough(a)C–O and(b)C–Nbondcleavage.c)Amidereductionintoenamine.
1.2.1NonǦCatalyticReductionofAmides
ǡȋ Ȍ ǡ Ǥͳͷǡͳ Ǧ Ǥͳ ǡ Ǧ Ǥ ǡ Ǧ Ǥͳͺ Ǧ ȋ ͶȌǡ ǡ ǡͳͻʹͲǡʹͳ ʹͲǡʹʹ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ǡ ȋ ͵ǡ ǤȌǡ Ǥʹ͵ǡʹͶǡǦ ǡ ȋ Ȍ Ǧ ȋ ͵ȉ ͵ȉʹȌǤ ǡ Ǧinsitu Ǧ ǡ ǡǦ ʹͷ Ǥ ȋʹȌ Ǧ ǡ Ǧ ͳǤʹǤͶ ǦǦǤ ȋ Ǧ Ȍǡʹ ǦǦ
͵
ȋ ȌǡʹǦ ʹͺ Ǥ NǦǦNǦȋȌǡ Ǧ Ǥ ǦǤʹͻ ͵Ͳ Ǧ Ǥ ǡ ȋʹ Ȍʹ ǡ ͳǤʹǤͷǤ
1.2.2CatalyticHydrogenationofAmides
Ǧ Ǧ Ǥ͵ͳǡ͵ʹ ǡ Ǧ ǡȋǡǡ Ȍǡ Ǥ͵͵ ǡ Ȃ ǡ ȋ ʹȌǤ͵Ͷ Ǧ Ǧ etal.ȋ ͵ȌǤ͵ͷ ǡ Ǧ Ǣ Ǧ Ǥ Ǥ
Scheme 3. Chemoselective hydrogenation of a secondary amide containing an estermoiety.
Ͷ
1.2.3CatalyticHydrosilylationofAmides
Ǧ Ȃ Ǥ͵͵ǡ͵ ǡ ǡ ǡǤǡ Ǥ ʹ ʹǡ ͵ǡͳǡʹǦȋȌ ȋȌǡ ȋȌ͵ ǡ ȋȌʹ ǡ ͵ ǡ ͳǡͳǡ͵ǡ͵Ǧ ȋȌǡȋȌȋ Ȍ ȋ ʹȌǤȂ ǡ Ǥ͵͵ Ǧ ǡǦ Ǧ ǡ ͶǡǦ ͵ ǡ Ǧ ͶǤ ǡ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ǡ ȋȌ͵ ǡ Ǧ ͵ͺ ǡ Ͷǡ Ǥ ǡǡ ǡ ǦǤ͵ ǡ ǡ Ǥ͵ͻ
Figure2.StructuresofafewcommerciallyavailablesilanesusedinhydrosilylaǦ tions.
Ǥ ǡ ǦǤ ǡ ǡ Ǥ͵ ǡ Ǥ
ͷ
ǦǡͶͲ ǡͶͳ ǡͶʹǡͶ͵ ǡͶͶǡͶͷͶǦ ǤͶ ǡ ǡ ǡ Ǧ Ǥ
Scheme 4. Reaction mechanisms suggested for the hydrosilylation; a)ChalkǦHarrod,b)modifiedChalkǦHarrod,c)ɐǦbondmetathesisand,d)Lewis acidcatalyzed.
Ǧ Ǧ Ǣ Ǧ ͶͺȋȌǦ ͶͻǡͷͲȋȌȋ ͶȌǤ ǡ Ǧ Ǥͷͳ Ǧ ȋȌ ȋȌ α Ǥ ͺǦͳͲǦ ǡͷʹǡͷ͵ͷͲ Ǧ Ͷͻ
Ǧ Ǧ ͶͺǡͷͶ Ǥ ǡ Ǧ ǡ ǡǦ Ǥͷͳ ɐǦ Ȃ ȋ Ͷ ȌǤǦ ǡ Ǧ ǡͷͷ Ȃ ͷ ȋǤǤ ȋ ͷȌ͵Ȍ ȋ ͶȌǤ Ǧ Ǧ Ǧ ǡ Ǥ Ǣ ǡ Ǥ Ǧ ǡ Ǥ͵͵ ȋͳǤʹǤͶͳǤʹǤͷȌ Ǧ Ǥ
1.2.4ChemoselectiveReductionofAmidestoAmines
ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥͷetal. ǡ ǦǤʹͶ ǡ ͵ήʹǡ ǦȋRȌǦǡ ȋ ͷͺ Ȍǡ ͵ήʹǦ ȋ ͷȌǤͷͻ Ȃ ǡ ͵ή Ǥ ͵ήʹȋRȌǦǦ ͵ΨȋȌǤ Ǧ Ǧ Ǧ Ǥ͵͵
Scheme 5. Chemoselective reduction as final step in the synthesis of (R)ǦVerapamil.
ȋ ȌǤͲ ʹ Ǧ ȋAȌǡ ȋ ͳǡͶǦǦʹǡǦǦ͵ǡͷǦ ǡ ȌǤ Ǧ ǡ ǡ ǡǡ ǤʹȀ Ǧ Ǧ ǡ ȋ ȌǤͳ ǡ ʹǦ ȋʹǦ Ȍ͵ ǡ ȋBȌ Ǥ Ǧ Ǥ ǡ ǡǡǡǦ Ǥ
Scheme6.ChemoselectivereductionbyprioractivationoftheamidewithTf2O.
ͺ
ǡ ͶͻΨȋ ȌǤǦ Ǣǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ȋ ͳǤʹǤͷͳǤ͵ǤͳȌǤ
Scheme7.SynthesisofDonepezil.
Ǧ ʹ ʹȀʹǦ Ǥ ǡ ȋȌ ȋȋ ͷȌ͵Ȍ Ǥ Ǧ ǡǡǡǦ ǡǤ Ǧ ȋ–ȌǦʹǦepiǦ ǡ Ǧ ȋConium maculatumȌ͵ȋ ͺȌǤ Ǧ ǡ ͻΨǤ ʹȀ Ͷ ʹ Ȁ Ͷ Ǧ ǤͶ ǡǡ Ǥ
Scheme8.Synthesisof(–)Ǧ2ǦepiǦpseudoconhydrine.
ͻ
Ǧ Ǥ Ǧ ȋȌͷȀ ͵ȋȌͳʹ Ǧ ȋ ͻȌǤͶͳ ǡ Ǧ Ǧ Ǥ ǡ ǡ ǤͶͳ
Scheme9.HydrosilylationprotocolsdevelopedbytheNagashimagroup.
Ǧ Ǣ ʹȉ ʹ ȋ ͻȌǤͶͲ Ǧ Ǣ ǡ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǧ Ǧ Ǧ ǡ ͻͺǤͻΨ Ǥ Ȃ ǤͷǡͷͶ Ǧ ǤͶͲ ʹ Ǧ ȋ ͻ ȌǤ ǡǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǧ ȋ͵ȌǤ ǡ Ǥ͵͵ ǡ
ͳͲ
Ǧ ǤͳͶ Ǧ ȋΪȌǦǡ ȋ ͳͲȌǤ ͵Ǥ
Scheme 10. Application of the hydrosilylation protocol developed by the NaǦ gashimagroupinthesynthesisof(+)ǦNeostenine.
ǡ ǦǦ Ͷͳ ͵ȋȌͳʹ Ǥ ͵ Ǥ Ǧ ǡǡ ǡ Ǥ ȋ ȌʹȋȌ͵ ǡ Ǧ ȋ ͳͳȌǤͶʹ ǡ ǤͶʹ Ǣ ȋ ȌʹȀȋȌʹ ȋȌʹȀ Ǧ Ǥ ǡ ǡǡ Ǥ ȋ ȌǦ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǧ ǡ Ǧ ͷǦǦ ͵
ͳͳ
ǤͶ ǡ ǡ Ǥ
Scheme11.HydrosilylationprotocolsdevelopedbytheBellergroup.
ȋ Ȍʹ Ͷͳǡ͵ǦȋȌȋȌ Ǧ ͵ ȋ ͳͳȌǤͶͲ Ǧ ǡ Ǥ Ǧ ǡ ȋ Ȍ ǡ Ǧ Ǥ ȋ ͳͳ ȌǤͺ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ Ǧ Ǥ ǡǦ Ǥ͵͵
Scheme12.AmidereductiondevelopedbytheBrookhartgroup.
Ǧ Ǧ ʹ ʹ ȋ ͳʹȌǤͶͲ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ Ǧ Ǥ ͳʹ
Ǧ ȋ ͳ͵ȌǤͶʹ ʹǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ Ǧ BocǦ ǡ Ǧ ȋ ǡȌǤ
Scheme13.HydrosilylationprotocolsdevelopedbytheAdolfssongroup(aand b)andbyKeinanandPerez(c).
ǡ ȋȌ ȽǡȾǦǦ ȋ ͳ͵ȌǤͻ Ǧ ǡ ȋ ͳ͵ ȌǤͲ ȋ ͳͶȌǤ ȋȌǦ ʹ͵Ǥ
Scheme14.SynthesisofNaftifinebyhydrosilylation.
ͳ͵
Ǧ Ǧȋ ͳͷȌǤͳ Ǧ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ Ǥ
Scheme15.HydrosilylationprotocoldevelopedbyBlanchet.
Ǧ Ǣ ǡ Ǧ Ǥ Ǧ Ǥ
1.2.5ChemoselectiveReductionofAmidestoAldehydes
ȂǤ ǡ Ȃ ǡ Ǥ Ǧ ʹǡ͵ ȋʹ Ȍȋ ͳȌǤ ǡhydrozirǦ conationǡ Ǥǡ ǡ ǤͶ ǡǦ ǡ Ǧ Ǧ ȋ ͳȌǤ ǡ Ǧ ǡʹǡ Ǧ Ǥ ǡ ǡǡ ǦBoc Ǥ ǡ ǡ Ǥ ǡǡ insituǤͷ ͳͶ
insituǦ Ǥ Ǥ
Scheme16.HydrozirconationofamidesintoaldehydesdevelopedbyGeorg.
Ͳǡͳ ʹ ȋ ͳǤʹǤͶȌǤ B Ȁ ͵ ȋ ͳȌǤͳ ǡǡǡǡ ǡ Ǥ
Scheme17.ChemoselectiveamidereductiondevelopedbytheCharettegroup.
ͳͻͻ ȋ ͳͺȌǤ i ȋ ȌͶʹ ʹ ǡ Ǥ Ǧ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ Ǧ Ǥ ȋ ʹ͵ȌǤ
Scheme 18. Hydrosilylation of tertiary amides followed by hydrolysis of the formedenaminesresultedinaldehydesasfinalproducts.
ͳͷ
1.3ReductiveFunctionalizationofAmides
Ǥ ͺ ͻ ͺͲ ͺͳ ͺʹ ʹǡ ͵ǡ ͵ǡ ͷ ȋȌʹǤ Ǧ ʹǡ Ǧ Ǥͺǡͺ͵ insitu Ǧ ǡ ȋ ͳͻȌǤ Ǧ Ǣ Ǧ ȋ ͳͻ ȌǤ
Scheme19.Generalschemeshowing(a)electrophilicand(bandc)nucleophilic activationandfunctionalizationofamides.
ǡ ǡ ǡ Ǧ Ǥ ǡ Ǧ Ǥ ǡ ȋ ͳͻ ȌǤ ǡ Ǥ
ͳ
1.3.1ElectrophilicActivationofAmides
Ǥ Ǧ ʹ Ǧ Aȋ ʹͲȌǤͺͶ ʹ Ǥͺǡͺͷ ȽǦC Ǥ ǦBǡ Ǥͺ Ǧ ǡ CB Ǥ
Scheme20.Differentintermediatesthatcanbeformedbyactivationofamides withtriflicanhydride.
ȽǦ ȋǡDEȌ Ǧ Ǥ Ǧ Fǡ Ǧ ǦǤͺ
ͳ
a) b) c) d) e) f) Citric acid 1. R4 MX Reduction or aqueous R4(SO)R5 m n + 2. H3O NaHCO3
Scheme21.TransformationsofamidesusingTf2O/2ǦFPyrasactivatingreagent.
Ǧ ȋ ͳǤʹǤͶ ʹͳȌǤͲǡͳǦ ͵ ȋ ͳǤʹǤͷǡ ͳ ʹͳȌǤͳ Ǧ ǡ ȽǦ ȋ ʹͳ ȌǡͺͺȽǦǡͺͻ ȽǦ ȋ ʹͳȌͻͲǡͻͳǡͻʹͻʹȋ ʹͳ ͻ͵ ʹͳȌ Ǥ ʹ ǡ ͻͶ ǦǤ ͵Ǧ ǡǦ Ǧ ͻͷ ͶǤ
ʹ ʹǦ ȋʹǦȌ ǡ Ǧ Ȃ ͵Ǧȋ ʹʹȌǤͻǦ ȋ ʹʹȌǤͻ ͵ǦǦȏͳǡʹǦaȐȋ ʹʹ ȌǤͻͺ ȋ ʹʹȌǤͻͻ ǡ Ǧ ǤͳͲͲ ǡ Ǧ ͳǡ͵Ǧ ǤͳͲͳ
ͳͺ
Scheme22.SelectedapplicationsoftheTf2Oactivationofamides.
1.3.2NucleophilicActivationofAmides
Ǧ ǡ ȋʹ ȌǤ Ǧ ǡ ȋ Ǧ ͳǤʹǤͷȌǤʹǡ͵ǡͶǡͷ ǡ Ǧ ȋȌǡ ȋ ͳȌǡ Ǥ Ǧ ǡ NǦǦ ȋ ʹ͵ȌǤͳͲʹ Ǧ ǡ Ǧ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ȋʹȌǤ ǡ Ǥ
ͳͻ
Scheme23.ChemoselectivereductivenucleophilicadditiondevelopedbyChida.
ȋ ʹͶȌǤ Ǧ ǡǡ Ǥ NǦǦ ǡ Ǧ Ǥ ȋ ʹ͵ Ȍǡ Ǧ Ǧ Ǥ
TMS-CN
Scheme 24. Different nucleophiles used in the reductive functionalization of amidesbytheChidagroup.
NǦ ȋάȌǦ ǡ Ǧ ȋ ʹͷȌǤͳͲ͵ ǡǦ
ʹͲ
ȋȌ͵Ǥ
Scheme25.ActivationandallylationofaNǦmethoxyamideinthesynthesisof (±)ǦGephyrotoxin.
NǦ ȋ ʹȌǤͳͲͶ ǡ ǡ Ǥ
Scheme26.Alkylationofamidesbypriorformationofiminiumions.
Ǧ ȋ ʹȌǤͳͲͷ ǡ Ǧ ͳͶ ǦǤ Ǣǡ Ǥ Ǧ AspidospermaǦ ͳͲȋάȌǦepiǦ ǤͳͲ ʹͳ
Scheme 27. Alkylation of amides by the prior activation/reduction with IrCl(CO)(PPh3)2.
Ǧ Ǧ ǡȽǦ ȋ ʹȌǤͳͲͺǡǯǦ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡǤ Ǧ NǦǡ ͳͲͻ ͵ȉʹ ȋ ʹͺȌǤ Ǧ Ǧ ȋ ʹͶȌǤ NǦ Ǧ NǡOǦ ǡ pǦȋȌ ȋ Ȍ ȋ ʹͺȌǤͳͳͲ
Scheme28.ReductivefunctionalizationdevelopedbytheChidagroup,employǦ ingtheIrCl(CO)(PPh3)2Ǧbasedreductionprotocolfortheinitialreduction.
ǡǦ Ǧ ǡ Ǧ Ǧ ǦǤ
ʹʹ
1.4ObjectivesoftheThesis
ȋȌǤǡǦ ʹǡ Ǥ Ǧ Ǧ Ǣ Ǧ Ǥ
͵ǡȋȌ ǡ Ǥ Ȃ Ǥ
ȋȌǦ Ǥ ǡ ǡ ǡ ͶǡͷǦǡ NǦ Ǥ ǡ NǦ ǡ Ǥ
ʹ͵
ʹͶ
2. Chemoselective Reduction of Tertiary AmidesunderThermalControl(PaperI)
ǡ ȋȌǦ ȽǡȾǦ Ǧ ȋ ͳ͵ ʹͻȌǤͻ Ǣ ǡ Ǥ ȋȌǦ 1a 3a͵ ͺͲ ι ͷ Ψ ȋȌǡ ȋͶ Ȍ ȋ ʹͻȌǤ ͳ Ǧ 1a´ Ǥͳͳͳ
Scheme29.a)Previouswork.b)TemperatureǦcontrolledhydrosilylationprotoǦ col.
1a’Ǧ Ǧ Ǧ ȋȌǦ NǡNǦȋ ȌNǡNǦǤͳͳʹ Ǧ Ǥͷʹ Ǧ Ǧ
ʹͷ
Ǥ Ǧ Ǧ Ǥ ȋ2aȌǡpǦ1b ǡ 2bͺͲΨǦȋ ͵ͲȌǤ NǦǡ2bͺΨ ͺ͵Ψǡ ǡ Ǥ Ǧ ǡ ǦǦ ǡ Ǥ Ǧ 2d Ǥ Ǧ 2e ͺͳΨͶͺ ȂͷιǤ Ǧ Ǧ ǤǦ 2f2g ͻΨͻͷΨͳ ǡ Ǥ ǡpǦǦ ȋͶǦȌȋǦͳǦȌ Ǧ ȋ͵ǦǦͶǦȌȋǦͳǦȌ 1hǦ ǡ Ǧ2hͺͳΨǤ Ǧ ȋ2iȌǡ Ǧ ȋ2jȌǡ Ǧ ȋ2kȌ ȋ2lȌͺͺΨǡʹΨǡͻΨͻΨǡ Ǥ BocǦ 1j Ǧ ǡ Ǥǡ ǡǦ ȋ2mȂ2qȌ ǤǡǦ 1m NǡNǦǦ Ǥ ȋ2r2sȌǤ
ʹ
2b,80% 2c, 67% 2d,92% 2e, 81% 2 h, 0 °C 6 h, 65 °C 3 h, r.t. 48 h, –5 °C 3 h, r.t., 86%a 13 h, r.t., 83%b
2f,c 69% 2g,c 95% 2h,d 81% 2i, 88% 5 h, 0 °C 24 h, –5 °C 5 h, 50 °C 3 h, r.t.
2j, 62% 2k,e,f 79% 2l, 74% 2m,81% 5 h, 40 °C 9 h, 40 °C 16 h, 50 °C 10 h, 60 °C 2 h, r.t., 88%g
2n, 83% 2o, 86% 2p,h 82% 2q,88% 3 h, 60 °C 3 h, r.t. 5 h, 65 °C 4 h, 50 °C O
N
MeO 2r,f 81% 2s,f 80% 24 h, r.t. 1 h, 40 °C Scheme30.ChemoselectiveformationofaldehydesfrompiperidinederivedamǦ ides 1 (1.0mmol), isolated yields. aDibenzyl derived amide 1b’. b Morpholine derived amide 1b’’. c 1H NMR yields using 1,3,5Ǧtrimethoxybenzene as internal d e f standard. Mo(CO)6(10mol%),TMDS(6.0equiv). TMDS(8.0equiv). Isolation g h wasperformedon0.5mmolscale. N,NǦdimethylderivedamide1m’. Mo(CO)6 (10mol%).
ʹ
ȋ ͵ͳȌǤ Ǧ Ǧ ȋ1b1cȌǡ Ǧ Ǥ NǦ ǡ NǡNǦ ȋ3b’Ȍǡ ȋ3b’’Ȍǡ NǡNǦ ȋ3m’ 3kȌȋ3uȌ Ǥ ǡ Ǧ 1d3d Ǥ Ǧ 3f3g 3t Ǥ1u Ǧ 3uǦ Ǥ ǡ ȋ3hȌǡȋ3i3vȌǡ ȋ3jȌǡȋ3mǡ3w3m’Ȍ ȋ3kȌǤ ǡ Ǧ ȋ1r1sȌ Ǧ 3r3sǤ
ʹͺ
3a, 97% 3b, 95% 3b’, 94% 5 h, 80 °C 2 h, 70 °C 3 h, 80 °C
3b’’, 77% 3c, 74% 3d, 92% 5 h, 80 °C 24 h, 80 °C 3 h, 80 °C
3t, 81% 3f: X = O, 82%a 3u,c 68% 3 h, 80 °C 3g: X = S, 78%b 4 h, 80 °C
3h,d 74% 3i, 78% 3v, 79% 4 h, 80 °C 3 h, 80 °C 3 h, 80 °C
e 3j, 76% 3m: 4-CO2Me, 86% 3m’, 70% f 4 h, 80 °C 3w: 2-CO2Me, 81% 5 h, 80 °C
3k,g 68% 3r,g 79% 3s,g 88% 24 h, 80 °C 1 h, 80 °C 1 h, 80 °C Scheme31.Chemoselectiveformationofaminesfromamides(1.0mmol),isolatǦ a b c d ed yields. 2 h, 65 °C. 5h, 65 °C. 99% ee. Mo(CO)6 (10mol%), TMDS (2.0mmol).eTMDS(2.0equiv),9h,80°C.f24h,65°C.gIsolationwasperformed on0.5mmolscale.
ʹͻ
ǡ Ǧ ȋ ͵ʹȌǤ Ǧ ʹ Ǥͳͳͳ ǡ ȋͷͲιȌǤ Ǧ ǡ ǡ Ǥ Ǧ ǡ Ǥ Ǧ ǡ Ǧ ǡ Ǧ 3n3pǤ
Scheme32.Chemoselectivereductionofamidestoamines.
Ǣ 1lpǦ ǡ ȋͶǦȌȋǦͳǦȌǡ Ǧ Ǥǡ Ǥ Ǥͳͳ͵ ͳ ǡ Ǧ ǡ ǦǤͳͳͶ ǡȽǦ ȋ ͵ ȋȌǦ ȌǤ ʹǦǦͳǦȋǦͳǦȌȋ6aǡvideinfraȌǦ Ǥ ͵Ͳ
2.1CompetitiveStudy–Chemoselectivity
ǡ ȋͳǣͳǣͳȌȋ ͵͵ȌǤ Ǧ 1b 3b Ǥ ǡȋ4Ȍȋ2bȌ Ǥ Ǧ Ǥ ǡ Ǧ Ǧ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ
Scheme33.Competitivereductionbetweenamide1b,ketone4andaldehyde2b.
2.2ApplicationsoftheReductionProtocol
Ǧ ǡ ȋ ͵ͶȌǤ 1d ͳͲ ȋ͵Ǥͳͷ Ȍ ʹǦ ȋʹǦǦ Ȍǡ ǡͳͳͷ2d ͻͲΨ ȋʹǤͳͲȌǤ ͳǤͷ ͻͳΨȋʹǤͷȌǤ
Scheme34.ScaleǦupreactionsofthechemoselectiveandtunableamidereducǦ tionintoaldehydeandamine. ͵ͳ
Ǧ 5ǡ ȋ ͵ͷȌǤ Ǧ ƲǤͳͳ 5 ͺʹΨ Ǥ Ǧ Ǥ
Scheme35.EmployingtheMo(CO)6ǦcatalyzedprotocolforlateǦstagefunctionalǦ izationinthesynthesisofDonepezil.
2.3Conclusions
Ǥ Ǧ ǡ Ȃ Ȃ Ǥ Ǧ ǡ Ǥ ǡǡǡǡ ǤǡǦ Ǥ ǡ Ǧ Ǥ ͶǦ ȋ2dȌ ͳǦȋͶǦȌ ȋ3dȌ ͳͲ Ǥ ǡ Ǧ Ǥ
͵ʹ
3. Mo(CO)6ǦCatalyzed Enamine Formation fromAmides(PapersII–V)
3.1Introduction
ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ Ǥͳͳ ǡ ǡ Ǥͳͳͺ Ǧ ǡ Ǧ Ǥ ǡ ǡ Ǧ Ǥͳͳͻ Ǧ Þ ȋ ͵ȌǤͳͳ ǡ Ǧ Ǥ Ǧ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ Ǧ ǤͳʹͲ Ǧ Ǧ Ǧ Ǧ ǡǡ ȋ ͵ȌǤͳʹͳ Ǧ ǡ ȋȌʹȋ Ȍ Ǧ ʹǡʹǯǦȋȌǦͳǡͳǯǦ ȋǦ Ȍ ͳʹʹ ȋ ͵ ȌǤ Ȁ ʹ Ǥ
͵͵
Scheme 36.Enamine formation a) withacid catalysis, b) PdǦcatalyzed aminaǦ tionofvinylhalides,andc)hydroaminomethylationofalkenes.
ȋ ͳǤʹǤ͵ȌǢ ǡ Ǥ Ǧ Ǧ via i ȋ ȌͶ ȋʹ ʹȌ ȋ ͵ȌǤ ǡ Ǥ
Scheme 37. Enamine synthesis by hydrosilylation a) employing stoichiometric i amountsofTi(O Pr)4,b)IrǦcatalysis,andc)baseǦmediatedamidehydrosilylation.
ȋ ͵ȌǤͳͶ Ǧ ǡ Ǥ Ǧ Ǧ Ǧ ͷ͵ ǡ ȋȌȋ͵Ȍʹǡ Ǥ ǡ tǦ Ǧ ͵Ͷ
ȋ ͵ ȌǤͳʹ͵ Ǧ Ǧ ȋ Ȍ ȋȌȋ͵ȌʹǦ Ǧ ǡ ǡ ȋ ͵ͺȌǤͳʹͶ Ǧ ͺͳΨǤ
Scheme38.ApplicationofthehydrosilylationprotocolinthesynthesisofTurkiǦ yenine.
viaǦ Aȋ ͵ͻȌǤ Ǧ BǦ Ȁ ǤͳͶǡͷ͵
O H OM R1 R3 M-H R1 R3 -OSiR R1 R3 N N 3 N Reduction H R2 H R2 H R2 Amide Hemiaminal Iminium ion A B
Deprotonation
H Deprotonation R1 R3 Elimination N R2 Enamine Scheme39.SuggestedpathwaysfortheformationofenaminesbyhydrosilylaǦ tion.
͵ͷ
3.2Optimization
Ǧ ȋ ʹȌtrans ȽǦ Ǥͳʹͷ ȋͳǡͳȂͺȌǤ Table1.Optimizationofreactionconditionsfortheenamineformation.a
Entry Solvent Time[h] Enamine7a[%]b ͳ ͵ εͻͷ ʹ ͵ ʹͲ ͵ ͵ ͵ Ͷ ͵ ͳͶ ͷ ͵ Ͳ ͵ ͺ ͵ ͺ ͵ ͺ͵ ͻ ͵ εͻͷ ͳͲ ǡ ͵ εͻͷ ͳͳ ǡ ͳ εͻͷ ͳʹ ǡ ͲǤͷ ͻͶ ͳ͵ ǡ ͲǤʹͷ ͺ ͳͶ ǡǡ ͳ εͻͷ ͳͷ ǡ ͵ ʹͲ ȋȌȋͲǤͲʹȌǡ6a ȋͳǤͲȌǡȋʹǡ ͲǤͷȌǡ ȋʹǤͲ ȌǤ ͳ ͳǡ͵ǡͷǦ Ǥ ȋͲǤͷǡʹȌǤȋͳǤͷȌǤǦ Ǥ ȋ͵ǤͲȌǤ Ǧ ǡ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ͳʹ Ǥ ȋͻȌ ͳǤͷ ȋ ͳͲȌǤ ǡ ͵ͲȋͳͳȂ
͵
ͳ͵Ȍǡ Ǧ ǡ ȋͳͶȌǤǦ ǡǡǡ ǡ Ǥ ȋͳͷȌǤ
3.3Scope
ǡ ȋ ͶͲȌǤ Ǧ Ǧ ȋ7bȂ7hȌǡ ȋ6bǡ6cǡ6fǡ6g6hȌǤ Ǧ ȋ6gȌ Ǧ Ǥ ȋ6i6jȌ ǡ Ǧ ǡvideinfraǤȽǦ ȋ6kȌ ǡ Ψ ͳ Ǥǡ ȋͺǣͳ͵ ȌǤ ͳ Ǥ
͵
7a, >95% 7b, >95% 7c, >95% 1 h 3 h 3 h
7d, >95% 7e, >95% 7f, >95% 7g,a 85% 1 h 1 h 2 h, 75 °C 24 h
7h, 80% 7i, >95% 7j,a >95% 7k,b 67% 2 h 3 h 2 h 7 h
7l, 70% 7m, >95% 7n, 89% 7o, >95% 2 h, 80 °C 1 h 5 h, 40 °C 4 h
7p, >95% 7q, >95% 7r, >95% 7s, >95% 0.5 h 3 h 1 h 2 h
7t, >95% 7u, >95% 7v, >95% 7w,c 88% 1 h 5 h 1 h 3 h
7x,a >95% 7y,d >95% 7z,a >95% 24 h 15 h 9 h Scheme 40. Chemoselective formation of enamines from amides (0.5 mmol). 1 a HNMR yields using 1,3,5Ǧtrimethoxybenzene as internal standard. Mo(CO)6 (5mol%). b1,4Ǧdimethoxybenzenewasusedasinternalstandard. cUnpublished d results. Et3N(10mol%)added.
͵ͺ
6l ǢǡͺͲι 7l ͲΨ ͳ Ǥ ǡǦ ǡ ǡ 7mǡ7n 7oǤ Ǧ Ǣ ǡ Ǧ ǤͳʹͲ 6q 6aǤ NǦ ʹǡǦȋ7sȌǡ ȋ7tȌǦ ȋ7u7vȌ Ǥ 7w ͳ ǤNǡNǦ6x Ǧ Ǥ NǦ 6y ǡ Ȃ ȋεʹͶ ͷ ιȌǤ ȋͳͲΨȌ εͻͷΨ ͳ ͳͷǤ ȽǦ ǡ Ǧ Ǥ Ǧ Ǧ Ǧ Ǥ ǡ 7z Ǧ Ǥ Ǧ ȋ6aȌǡȋ6pȌȋ6rȌȋʹȌǤ Ǥ Ǧ Ǥǡͳʹ
͵ͻ
Table 2. Comparison between amides with different NǦsubstituents in the forǦ mationofenamines.a
Entry Amide Enamine [%]
ͳ ͺ
6a 7a
ʹ ͻʹ 6p 7p
͵ ͺͻ 6r 7r
6 ȋͲǤͷ Ȍǡ ȋȌ ȋʹ ΨȌǡ ȋͲǤͷ Ȍǡ ȋͲǤʹͷ ǡ ʹȌǤ ͳ ͳǡ͵ǡͷǦ Ǥ
ȋ ͶͳȌǤ ȽǦȋ6aaȂ6adȌǡ Ǧ Ǥ 6aeǦ 6afǡǦ Ǥǡ 6agǡ͵ͺΨͳ Ǥ 6ah ͵ͲΨǤȽǦ 6ai 6aj Ǥ 6ak ʹ Ǧ Ǥ 6alǡ Ǣǡ Ǧ Ǥȋ6alȌ ͶǤ
ͶͲ
6aa 6ab 6ac 6ad
6ae 6af 6ag 6ah
6ai 6aj 6ak 6al Scheme41.Amidesthatdidnotsuccessfullyundergoenamineformationusing theMo(CO)6Ǧcatalyzedprotocol.
transȋ 7kȌǡǡ Ǧ Ǥͳʹͺ Ǧ ȋ ͶȂȌǤ Ǧ ǡǦ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ
Ͷͳ
3.4Conclusions
ȋȌǦ Ǥ ǡ ȋ ǡȌǡ Ǧ Ǥ ǡ Ǧ Ǥ Ǧ Ǧ ǡ e.gǤ Ǥ Ǥ
Ͷʹ
4.ReductiveFunctionalizationofAmidesinto TriazolinesandTriazoles(PaperII)
4.1Introduction
ȟʹǦͳǡʹǡ͵Ǧ ȋ ͶǡͷǦǦͳHǦͳǡʹǡ͵ǦȌ ͳǡʹǡ͵Ǧi Ǧ ȋ ͵ȌǤ Ǧ ͳʹͻǡͳ͵ͲǤͳ͵ͳ Ǧ Ǧ Ǧ Ǧ ȋ Dz dz ǡ ͶʹȌǤͳ͵ʹ ǡ Ǧ Ǥ
Figure3.Structuresoftriazolineandtriazole.
Scheme42.CuǦcatalyzed“Click”reactionbetweenanalkyneandanazideformǦ ingtriazoleasproduct.
ǡ ͳͻͳʹ ͳǡ͵Ǧ Ǧ
i ȋǤǡǤǡǤǡ Ǥǡ ǤǡACSCatalysisǡ2017ǡ7ǡͳͳǦͳͷȌ triazolinestriazoles. Ͷ͵
ͳ͵͵ȋ Ͷ͵ȌǤͳ͵Ͷ ̵±Ǧ Ǧ Ǥͳ͵ͷ ǡ Ǥ ȋͳʹȌ ǦǤͳ͵ Ǧ Ǧ ȋe.gǤȌ Ǧ Ǥͳ͵ ǡ Ǥ in situ ͳǡ͵Ǧ Ǥ etal. ǡ ǡ Ǥͳ͵ͺ Ǧ ȋ Ͷ͵ȌǤͳ͵ͻ ǡǡpǦ Ǥ
Scheme43.Synthesisoftriazolinesthrougha)1,3Ǧcycloadditionofazideswith activatedolefins,b)cycloadditionwithinsituformedenamines,c)triazoleforǦ mationviatriazolineintermediates.
in situ ͳǡ͵Ǧ ȋ Ͷ͵ ȌǤͳͶͲ ǡ Ǥ Ǧ ǤͳͶͳ
ͶͶ
4.2Results
ȋȌǦ Ǧ ȋ Ǧ ͵ȌǤ Ǧ Ǧ Ǥ Ǧ Ǥ ǡͳǤͷ ȋ8aȌǦȋ7aȌǦ 9a ȋ ͶͶȌǤ ͻͳΨ Ǧ Ǥ Ǧ Ǥ Ǧ ȋȌǤ ͷΨ ǡ Ǧ Ǥ
Scheme44.OneǦpotformationoftriazolinesfromamides.
Ǧ ǡ Ǥͳ͵ Ǥͳ͵ ͶͶǡ ͳ 9dǤ ȋ ͵ ͶͷȌǤ Ǧȋ7bȌ Ǧ ȋ7cȌ Ǥ ǡ 9dͺ͵ΨǤ 6k ȋͺǣͳ͵Ȍȋ9eȌ
Ͷͷ
ʹǣͳȋ ͶȌǤ Ǧ Ǧ ͳ Ǥ cisǤ 6l ǡ9fǤǦ ǡ Ǧ ȋ9gȌǡȋ9hȌȋ9iȌ Ǧ Ǥ
9a, 91% 9b, 86% 9c, 88% 2 h 2 h 2 h
9d, 83% 9e,a,b 61% 9f, 66% 2.5 h 15 h 3 h
9g, 94% 9h, 84% 9i, 88% 2 h 2.5 h 3 h Scheme45.Evaluationoftertiaryamides6inthechemoselectivereductionand subsequent cycloaddition reaction with enamines from amides (1mmol) with organicazide8a,isolatedyields.aReactionperformedat60°C.bDiastereomers wereobtainedina2:1ratio.
Ͷ
Scheme46.Distributionofdiastereomersforcompound9e.
͵ǡ 6al Ǧ Ǥ Ǧ ǡ insitu ȋ ͶȌǤ Ǧ ȋȌȋ͵ͲΨȌ ȋʹȌ pǦ ͵Ǧ 8bǤ ǡǦ 9j ͺͲΨǤǦ Ǥ
Scheme47.Tandemreactionforthealdehydecontainingamide6al(0.5mmol) intothecorrespondingtriazoline9j.
Ͷ
Table 3. Comparison between enamines containing different NǦsubstituents in thecyclizationwithphenylazide(8).a
Entry Enamine Triazoline [%]
ͳ ͳͶ
7a 9a
ʹ Ͷʹ
7p 9k
͵ ͳ 7r 9n 6 ȋͲǤͷ ȌǤ ͳ ͳǡ͵ǡͷǦǤ
ȋ7aȌǡȋ7pȌǦ ȋ7rȌ ȋ͵Ȍ 7p Ǥ Ǥǡ ǤǡͳͶʹ NǦ 9k9q ͶͺǤ
Ͷͺ
9k, 90% 9l, 72% 9m, 78% 9n, 92% 3 h 3 h 1 h 3 h
9o, 90% 9p,a 82% 9q,a 60% 5 h 5 h 3 h Scheme48.Evaluationoftertiaryamides6inthechemoselectivereductionand subsequent cycloaddition reaction of enamines from amides (1mmol), isolated a yields. pǦCF3phenylazide(8b)wasused.
Ǧ ȋ ͶͻȌǤȋ9rȌǡǦ ȋ9sȌǡȋ9tȌǡȋ9vȌǡ ȋ9aaȌǡȋ9yǡ 9x9aiȌǡȋ4ajȌȋ4akȌ Ǥ 9ah ȋ͵ͷΨȌǡ ǡ Ǧ Ǥ
Ͷͻ
9r, 92% 9s, 85% 9t, 93% 9u, 88% 3 h 3 h 3 h 2 h
9v, 78% 9w, 75% 9x, 88% 9y, 79% 3 h, 65 °C 15 h, 65 °C 3 h, r.t. 22 h, 50 °C
9z, 95% 9aa, 82% 9ab, 80% 9ac, 85% 3 h 3 h 2 h 3 h
9ad, 92% 9ae, 89% 9af, 97% 9ag, 85% 2 h 20 h 3 h 7 h
9ah, 35% 9ai, 91% 9aj, 90% 9ak, 93% 3 h 3 h 3 h 3 h Scheme49.Evaluationoforganicazides8inthechemoselectivereductionand subsequentcycloadditionreactionwithenaminesfromamides6(1mmol),isolatǦ edyields.
Ǧ 7gȋpǦʹȌ pǦ ͵ ȋ8bȌ Ǥ 10a ǡ ȋ ͷͲȌǤ ǡ Ǧ 10bǤ ǡ 10c Ǥ Ǧ Ǥ ͷͲ
ǡ ȋ Ȁ Ȍ ǡ Ǥͳ͵ ȋʹͷ ΨȌ10d10e ǦǦǤ ǡ ȋ10eȌ Dz dz Ǥ
10a,a 58% 10b,b,c 79% 10c,b 96% 15 h, r.t. 24 h, 80 °C 65 h, 80 °C
10d,a,d 92% 10e,b,d 78% 3 h, 65 °C 2 h, r.t. Scheme50.Evaluationoftertiaryamides6andazides8inthechemoselective reduction and subsequent cycloaddition reaction with enamines from amides (1mmol),isolatedyields. aPiperidinederivedamidewasused. bPyrrolidinedeǦ rived amide was used. c Isolation was performed on 0.5 mmol scale. d KOH in methanol(2M,0.25equiv)wasaddedandreactionwasleftforadditional3hat 65°C.
ǡ Ǧ Ǧ ȋ ͷͳȌǤ 9aj ͻʹΨͷ 10f ǡ Ǥ
ͷͳ
Scheme51.ScaleǦupreactionsoftheprotocolsfor(a)triazolineand(b)triazole formation.
4.3Conclusions
ȋȌǦ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ
ͷʹ
5.ReductiveFunctionalizationofAmidesinto NǦSulfonylformamidines(PaperIII)
5.1Introduction
Ǧǡ ǡ ǡ ǤͳͶ͵ǡͳͶͶ ǤͳͶͷǡ ǡ ǡǡǦ ǤͳͶ ȋ ͳǤ͵ȌǤ ͳͶ ȋ ͷʹȌǤ etal.͵ ͳͶͺ ȋ ͷʹȌ etalǤ͵Ȁ ʹǦ ȋ ͷʹ ȌǤͳͶͻ a) R4 R4 R5 O N N 1. Tf2O 1.3 equiv 3 3 3 1 R 1 R or 1 R R N 2. H R N R N 2 2 R 4 N 5 R R R R2 = alkyl R2 =H R5 =H b) 2 NH2 R R2 O N AlMe3 2.8 equiv 1 1 R NH2 R NH2
c) 1. Ph P/I 1.5 equiv R3 R4 O 3 2 N Et3N 5.0 equiv R2 R2 R1 N 2. H R1 N H N R3 R4 d) Ts TsN 1.5 equiv N R3 3 R1 N R3 R1 N R2 CH2Cl2, r.t., 20 min R2 Scheme 52. Preparation of amidines through electrophilic amide activation a)byCharetteandGrenon,b)Velavanetal.andc)Phakhodeeetal.
ͷ͵
NǡNǦ ͳͷͲ ȋ ͷʹȌǤͳͷͳ Ǧ ͺͲ ͻ ǡ ͷǡ ͵ ͺ ͳͷʹ ʹ Ǧ Ǥ
5.2Results
ȋ ͶȌǦ 11a 9ǡ NǦ 12a ȋ ͷ͵ȌǤ 11a ͵Ͳ ͶͲιǤ 12a Ǥ Ǧ ǡǦ ȋ6aeȌ ȋ ͵ȌǤǡ Ǧ Ǥ
Scheme53.OneǦpotformationofNǦsulfonylformamidinebyreductivefunctionǦ alizationofamides.
Ǧ NǦȋ ͷͶȌǤinsitu7 11a NǡNǦȋ12b12cȌǡǦ ȋ12d12eȌǡ NǡNǦȋ12fȌǡ NǡNǦ ȋ12gȌǡ ȋ12hȌǡ ȋ12iȌǡ ʹǡǦ ȋ12jȌ NǦǦNǦ ȋ12kȌ Ǥ
ͷͶ
12a, 78% 12b, 64% 12c,a 60%
12d, 68% 12e,a 57% 12f, 75% O O S iPr N N iPr 12g, 72% 12h, 66% 12i, 58%
12j, 39% 12k, 63% Scheme54.Evaluationoftertiaryamides6inthechemoselectivereductionand subsequentreactionofenaminesfromamides(1mmol)withsulfonylazide11a, a isolatedyields. pǦNO2sulfonylazide11bwasused.
ǡ NǦ ͶΨͻΨȋ ͷͷȌǤ ȋ12o12tȌǡ ȋ12pȌǡȋ12xȌǡ ȋ12wȌȋ12vȌǡǤ NǦ12z12aaǤ
ͷͷ
12l, 50% 12m, 57% 12n, 50%
12o, 70% 12p, 49% 12q, 61%
12r, 63% 12s, 55% 12t, 60%
12u, 54% 12v, 79% 12w, 60%
12x, 47% 12y, 69%
12z, 83% 12aa, 58% Scheme55.Evaluationofsulfonylazides(11)inthechemoselectivereduction andsubsequentreactionofenaminefromamide6p(1mmol)withsulfonylazǦ ides,isolatedyields.
ͷ
ǡ NǦ12a Ǧ Ǧȋ ͷȌǤ ͲΨȋͳǤȌ ͳͲ Ǥ
Scheme56.SynthesisofNǦsulfonylformamidine12aonapreparativescale.
ǡ ȋ ͶȌǡ Ǥͳ͵ǡͳͷ͵ Ͷ ǡ ǡ ȋ9Ȍ ǡ ȋ10ȌǤǢ ǡ NǦǤ ǡ NǦ ͳHǦͳǡʹǡ͵Ǧȋ10Ȍ Ǧ Ǥͳͷ͵ ǡǦ Ǥ Ǧ ǡ ȽǦ ʹ ȋ ͷȌǤͳͷͶNǦ Ǧ Ǧ ȋȌȋ ͷȌǤͳͷͷ Ǥͳͷ 12 ǤǦ Ǥͳͷ
ͷ
Scheme 57. Proposed mechanism for the cleavage of the formed triazoline by a)Ramström,YanandHouk,b)LiandcoǦworkers.
9 Ǧ 13 ȋ ͷͺȌǤ 14ȋʹʹΨͳ ǡͳ͵ΨȌǡ viaǦ ȋ13ȌǤ
Scheme 58. Proposed mechanism of triazoline decomposition leading to NǦsulfonylformamidine and aryldiazomethane (13) and trapping experiment withbenzoicacidtoformester14.
ͷͺ
5.3Conclusions
Ǧ NǦ ǤǦ NǦǦ Ǥ ǡ Ǧ NǦ 12a ͳͲ Ǥ Ǧ via ȋ13Ȍ Ǥ
ͷͻ
Ͳ
6.ReductiveFunctionalizationofAmidesinto 4,5ǦDihydroisoxazoles(PaperIV)
6.1Introduction
ͶǡͷǦii ͳͷͺ Ǧ ǡͳͷͻ ȾǦǡͳͲȾǦǡͳͳ ȾǦ ǡͳͲȾǦ ǡͳʹͳ͵ ǤͳͶ ǡʹǦ Ǥ Ǧ ͳǡ͵Ǧ Ǧ ǤͳͶǡͳͷ in situǡ ȋȌ Ǧ ǡȋȌ ȋ ȌǦǦ ȋ ͷͻȌǤ Ǧ Ǧ ʹǦȋ ͲȌǤͳ
Scheme59.Insitupreparationofnitrileoxides.
ii ȋǤǡ Ǥǡ Ǥǡ Ǥǡ Adv. Synth. Catal.ǡ 2017ǡ 359ǡ ͳͻͻͲǦͳͻͻͷȌ 2Ǧisoxazoline. ͳ
Scheme 60. Synthesis of 4,5Ǧdihydroisoxazoles from (a) alkenes, (b) isolated enaminesand(c)insitupreparedenamines.
ͳǡ͵Ǧ ͷǦǦ ͶǡͷǦǤ ǦǡǦ Ǧ ȋ ͲȌǤͳǡͳͺǡ Ǧ ʹǦǡ Ǥͳͻ ǡ ʹǦ insitu, ͷǦǦͶǡͷǦ ȋ Ͳ ȌǤͳͲ ǡǦȋ ͳȌǤͳͳ OH N
Cl 0.8 equiv O N N O Et3N 1.1 equiv N N DCM, 25 °C, 2 - 3 h SO NH 89% GC yield Valdecoxib 2 2 Yield: 60% 69% GC yield Scheme61.ReportedsynthesisofValdecoxib,anonsteroidalantiǦinfammatory drug.
ʹ
6.2Results
Ǧ Ǧ in situ ȋͶȌǤ 7p ȋ ͶȌ Ǥ ǡ 16a ͳǤͷ ȋ15aȌ ͷιȋͳȂʹȌǤ ǡ Ǧ Ǧ in situ 15a ȋ͵ȂͷȌǤͳͲ Ǧ ʹǦ16a Ǥ Ǧ ȋȂͺȌǤ Table4.Optimizationofreactionconditionsfortheformationof2Ǧisoxazoline.a
Entry 15a[equiv] Additive[equiv] 2ǦIsoxazoline16a[%]b ͳ ͳǤͷ Ǧ Ǧ Ǧ ʹ ͳǤͷǦ Ǧ Ǧ ͵ ͳǤͷ ͳǤͷ Ͷ Ͷ ͳǤͷ ʹ͵ ͳǤͷ Ͷͺ ͷ ͳǤͷ ͵ ͳǤͷ εͻͷ ͳǤͷ ͵ͳǤͳͺͻ ͳǤͳ ͵ͳǤͷ ͺ ͳǤͷ ͵ͳǤʹͷͻ͵ 15a 6p 7p ȋͲǤͷȌǤͳ ͳǡ͵ǡͷǦ Ǥ ͷιǤ
Ǧ ʹǦ ȋ16aȌǡ ȋ16bȌǡ ʹǡǦ Ǧ ȋ16cȌǡȋ16dȌǡȋ16eȌǡ ȋ16fȌǡ NǦǦNǦ ȋ16gȌ ȋ16hȌ ȋ16iȌ ȋ ʹȌǤ NǡNǦ 6w ͵
͵ ȋ ͵Ȍǡ ǡ ͳǡ͵Ǧ Ǥ
16a, 84% 16b, 94% 16c, 84% 16d, 85%
16e, 93% 16f, 84% 16g,a 92% 16h, 79%
16i, 81% 16j, 93% 16k, 80% 16l, 91%
16m, 80% 16n, 55% 16o, 91%
16p, 93% 16q, 96% 16r,a 74% Scheme62.Evaluationoftertiaryamides6inthechemoselectivereductionand subsequentcycloadditionreactionwithenaminesfromamides(1mmol),isolated yields.aIsolationwasperformedon0.5mmolscale.
Ͷ
Ǧ ȋ16lȌ Ǧ ʹǦ ȋ16jǡ 16k 16oȌ Ǥ ǡ 6c 6h Ǥ ʹǦ16mͺͲΨǡ ǤʹǦ 16n 6lȋͷͷΨȌ ȋ ͵ȌǤ ȋȌǦ Ǧ ʹǦ Ǧ ȋ16oȌǡ ȋ16pȌǡȋ16qȌȋ16rȌǤ ʹǦ 6o ʹΨ ͳ Ǣ ǡ Ǧ Ǧ Ǥ ͳǡ͵Ǧ ȋ ͵ȌǤ ʹǦ pǦ ȋ16sȌǡ ȋ16tȌǡ pǦ ȋ16uȌ pǦ ȋ16vȌ Ǥ ʹǦ16w ͺͲΨ ǡ 16x16yǤ
16s, 89% 16t, 91% 16u, 90% 16v, 87%
16w, 80% 16x, 89% 16y, 83% Scheme63.Evaluationofhydroximinoylchlorides15inthechemoselectivereǦ duction and subsequent cycloaddition reaction with enamine from amide 6p (1mmol),isolatedyields.
ͷ
ǡ ǡ Ǧ ͳǡ͵Ǧ Ǧ ǡ ǡǤͳͲ ǦʹǦ17 Ǧ ȋ ͶȌǤ ͳʹ ʹǦ ͳ ǡ Ǧ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ͶǦǦͶǡͷǦ Ǥ ǤͳͲ ͵ǡͶǦ ͶǦǦͶǡͷǦ ǦǤͳ͵ 16a ǡ 19ͺͳΨȋ ͶȌǤͳ 19 ǡͳͶ Ǧ Ǧ ͷǦǤ
Scheme64.a)Differentregioisomersthatcanbeformedinthe1,3ǦdipolarcyǦ cloaddition. b) Determination of the regioisomer formed under the developed reactionconditions.
6.3Conclusions
ǦʹǦviaǦ Ǥ ȋȌǦ Ǥ
7.ReductiveFunctionalizationofAmidesinto Pyrimidinediones and Thioacrylamides (PaperV)
7.1Introduction
ǡ ȋ ͷȌǤ ǡ ǤͳͷǦ ͷǤͳ ǡetal. ȋʹͲΨȂͶͻΨȌinsitu ͵ ȋͳͶͲιȌǤͳ ȋ ͷ ȌǤͳͺ
Scheme65.(a)Generalstructureofpyrimidinedione.SynthesisofpyrimidinediǦ onesby(b)cyclizationand(c)dimerizationofynamides.
ͳͻ ǡǡ ǡ ȋ ȌǤͳͺͲ
Ǧ ȋ ȌǤͳͺͳ Ǧ Ǧ ǡ ȋʹȌǤ
Scheme66.Thesynthesisofthioacrylamidesfromenamines(a)and(b)amides.
7.2Results
ȾǦǦȾǦ ȋ ȌǤͳͺʹ ͳǤͷ 20a7p 21aǤ ǡ 22a Ǥ 22a ʹǤʹ20a Ǥ Ǧ ͷιͶ ǤǦ 6p ͶͲΨ ͳ 22aǡǡ Ǥ
Scheme67.Formationofpyrimidinedione22afromenamine7p.
ǡ ȋ ȋ7aȌǡȋ7pȌ
ͺ
NǡNǦȋ7rȌȌ 22aȋͷȌǤ ǡ Ǥ Table 5. Comparison between enamines containing different NǦsubstituents in thecyclizationwithphenylisocyanate(20a).a
Entry Enamine Pyrimidinedione22a[%]
ͳ Ͷ
7a
ʹ ͷ 7p
͵ ͳ 7r 6ȋͲǤͷȌǤͳ ͳǡ͵ǡͷǦǤ
ǦǦ Ǧ ȋ22bȌ Ǧȋ22cȌȋ ͺȌǤ 6lȋ ͵Ȍ22dǤ 22e ͺͷΨǤ Ǧ ȋ22fȌǡȋ22gȌǡȋ22hȌ ȋ22iȌ Ǥ 7f ͶΨǦ 20aǤ pǦ ȋ20bȌ Ǧ ȋʹȌǡ ͺͷΨ22fǤ Ǧ pǦʹ 7gǡ Ǧ Ǥ
ͻ
22a,a 75% 22b, 92% 22c, 76%
22d, 57% 22e,a 85% 22f,a,b 85%
22g,a,c 64% 22h,d 71% 22i,d,e 76% Scheme68.Evaluationofamides6inthechemoselectivereductionandsubseǦ quent functionalization with enamines from piperidine derivated amides (1mmol),isolatedyields. aEnaminefrompyrrolidinederivatedamidewasused. bpǦFluorophenylisocyanate20b(3.5equiv)wasused,65°C,72h.c65°C,16h. dIsolationwasperformedon0.5mmolscale.ePhenylisocyanate20a(3.0equiv) wasused.
ǡ ȋ20Ȍ NǦȋ ͻȌǤǦ 22jǡ ǤǦ ǡ ͳ ͳ͵ Ǥ Ǧ ȋ22kȌǡȋ22l22mȌǡ ȋ22nȌ ȋ22oȌ ǤpǦ ǡ ȋ Ȍ ǡ Ǥ
Ͳ
22j, 40% 22k,a 83% 22l,b 75%
CN O Ph N
N O
CN
22m, 94% 22n,a,c 86% 22o, 84% Scheme 69. Evaluation of aryl isocyanates 20 in the chemoselective reduction andsubsequentfunctionalizationwithenaminefromamide6p(1mmol),isolated yields.a65°C,16h.bIsocyanate(3.0equiv),65°C,16h. Isolationwasperformed on0.5mmolscale.
23a Ǧ 24aȋ ͲȌǤ ǡ 25aǡ ǤͳͺͲ 23aʹǤʹͳǤͳǤ ͷιͳǡ 25a Ǧ ͻͶΨǤǡǦ 6p Ǥ ͳ 25aȋͷΨȌǦ ȋ6pȌǤ Ǧ 22 Ǥ
ͳ
Scheme70.Evaluationofphenylisothiocyanate23ainthesynthesisofpyrimǦ idinethione24a.Formationofpyrimidinedione22afromenamine7p.
ǡ ȋ25aȂ25gȌ ȋ ͳȌǤ Ǧ ǦpǦ7g Ǥǡ 25e ͺͻΨ Ǥ NǦ ͵Ǧ ȋ25fȌǡȋ25gȌNǡNǦȋ25hȌ Ǥ Ǣ Ǧ ǡȋ7pȌǡNǡNǦȋ7rȌǡȋ7aȌǦ ȋ7qȌǡ ǤǡͳͶʹ ȋ25iȌ Ǧ ȋ25jȌ Ǧȋ25k25lȌ ǤǡpǦ ʹǦ ǦʹǦ ȋtertǦ Ȍ 7pǤ
ʹ
25a, 94% 25b, 94% 25c, 75% 25d, 60%
25e, 89% 25f, 67% 25g, 39% 25h, 71%
25i, 83% 25j, 82%
25k, 94% 25l, 97% Scheme71.Evaluationofamides(6)andisothiocyanates(23)inthechemoseǦ lective reduction and subsequent functionalization of enamines from amides (1mmol),isolatedyields.
ǡ ȋ25Ȍ 7Ǥ Ǥͳͺ͵ǡ25a Ǧ 26 ȋ ʹȌǤ ͳ 6 ͵ǡǡ d Ǧ Ǥ etalǤǦ ͳǣͳǤʹǣȋ ͵ǦǦNǡ͵ǦȌǤͳͺͶ
͵
Scheme72.Hydrolysisofthioacrylamide25aintothecorrespondingaldehyde 26.
7.3Conclusions
Ǧ in situ Ǧ Ǥǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ insitu Ǧ ǡ Ǧ Ǥ
Ͷ
ConcludingRemarks
ǡ ȋȌ Ǧ ǤǦ Ǧ ǡǤ Ǧ Ǧ ǡ ǡǡ Ǥ ͷ ͳͲ Ǥ ǡ Ǧ Ǥ Ǧ Ǥ ǡ ǡ ǡ NǦǡ ͶǡͷǦǡ ǡ Ǥ ǡ NǦ Ǧ Ǥ
ͷ
AppendixA:ContributionList
ǯ Ȃǣ
I. Ǥ
II. Ǥ
III. Ǧ Ǥ
IV. Ǥ
V. Ǥ
AppendixB:ReprintPermissions
ǣ I. ǤǡȗǤǡǤǡ Ǥȗ Angew.Chem.Int.Ed.,2016ǡ55ǡͶͷʹǦͶͷ ̹ʹͲͳǦ ƬǤ ǡ II. ǤǡǤǡǤǡ Ǥǡȗ Ǥȗ ACSCatalysisǡ2017ǡ7ǡͳͳǦͳͷ ̹ʹͲͳ III. ǤǡǤǡ Ǥǡȗ Ǥȗ ChemistryOpenǡ2017ǡ6ǡͶͺͶǦͶͺ ̹ʹͲͳǦ ƬǤ ǡ IV. Ǥǡ Ǥǡ Ǥǡȗ Ǥȗ Adv.Synth.Catal.ǡ2017ǡ359ǡͳͻͻͲǦͳͻͻͷ ̹ʹͲͳǦ ƬǤ ǡ V. ǤǡᑽǤǡᑽ Ǥǡȗ Ǥȗ Chem.Commun.ǡ2017ǡ53ǡͻͳͷͻǦͻͳʹ ̹ʹͲͳ
Acknowledgements
ǡ ǡ ǡ Ǥǡ ǣ ǡHansAdolfsson ǤǤǡ Ǥ Ǩ PherG.AnderssonǤ Ǧ Ǣ Hasseǡ Fredrikǡ Pazǡ Alexeyǡ Erik Markusǡ Ǩ ǦǢDr. Paz Trilloǡ Dr.FredrikTinnisǡ Dr. Helena Lundbergǡ Dr. Alexey Volkovǡ AnǦ dreyShatskiyǡIdaPershagenǡToveKivijärviGabriellaKerveforsǤ
ȋȌǦǢFredrikǡAlexeyPazǨ Fredrikǡ Ǩ Ǩ-ǡȀ Ǧ ǡǨ Dz dz Ǩ Alexeyǡ Ǩ thehardwayǦ Ǩ Ǩ- Pazǡ Ǧ Ǩ Ǩ ¤Ǩ Ǩ
ͺ
ToveGabriellaǦ Ǥǡ Ǩ BeritOlofssonNicklasSelander Ǩ GrasshopperǨ- BrofficeǡǦ Ǩ ǢJennyǡLouiseǡSigridǡCarinǡKristinaǡOlaMartin Ǧ Ǥ Carin Ǩ Ǩ- girl gang ǢSaraǡJohannaǡTanjaǡElinǡGabbiToveǤ DepartmentofOrganicChemistryǤ Knut & Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelseǡ Ångpanneföreningens ForǦ skningsstiftelseǡ Gålöstiftelsenǡ Stiftelsen Längmanska Kulturfondenǡ HelgeAx:on Johnsons stiftelseǡ VetenskapsrådetThe Royal Swedish AcademyofScience Ǥ Toallmyfriendsandrelatives,especiallytheDelzannomob! MoaSaraǡǡ Ǩ ǡ ǡ Ǩ IsabelleǡǦ Ǥ Ǩ mumdadǡ Ǥ ¡Ǩ FridaǡǨ Ǧ ǡ Ǩ- ErikǡǡǤ
ͻ
ͺͲ
References
ͳ ǡ 2017 ǡ ǣ ǣȀȀǤ ǤȀȀȀȀ̴̴ Ǥȋ ʹͲͳǦͲǦʹͳȌ ʹ ǤǤǡ ǤǤǡGreenChemistry:TheoryandPracticeǡ ǡ1998ǡǤ͵ͲǤ ͵ ǤǡǤǡChem.Eur.J.ǡ2017ǡ23ǡͳͷǦͳ͵Ǥ Ͷ Ǥ ǤǡAdv.DrugDeliver.RevǤǡ2002ǡ54ǡͳͳͶͷǦͳͳͷͷǤ ͷ ǤǤǡ ǤǤǡNatureǡ2011ǡ480ǡͶͳǦͶͻǤ Ǥ ǡ The Chemistry of Amidesǡ ƬǤǡ1970ǡ Ǥʹ͵Ǧ͵ͶǤ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Stereoelectronic Effects: A Bridge between Structure and Reactivityǡ ǡ2016ǡǤͳͷʹǦͳǤ ͺ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ J. Org. ChemǤǡ 2016ǡ 81ǡ ͶͶʹͳǦͶͶʹͺǢ ȌǤǤǡ Ǥ , Angew. Chem. Int. EdǤǡ 2015ǡ 54ǡ ͳ͵ͺͷǦͳ͵ͺͷͺǢ ȌǤ ǡǤ ǡǤǡAdv.Synth.CatalǤǡ2014ǡ 356ǡ͵ͻǦ͵͵Ǥ ͻ Ǥ ǡǤǤ ǡǤ Ǥ ǡǤǤ Ǥǡ ǤǤǦ ǡ Ǥ ǤǦǡAngew.Chem.Int.EdǤǡ2012ǡ51ǡͷͶͺǦͷͷͳǤ ͳͲ ǡǤǡǤǡǤǡǤ ǡǤǡTop.CatalǤǡ2010ǡ 53ǡͻͻǦͻͺͶǤ ͳͳ ȌǤǡǤǡJ.Org.ChemǤǡ1986ǡ51ǡͶͲͲͲǦͶͲͲͷǢȌǤǤǡ ǤǤ ǡǤǤǡǤǤǡJ. Org. ChemǤǡ 1988ǡ 53ǡ Ͷʹ͵ǦͶʹͶͳǢ ȌǤǤǡǤǤ ǡǤǤǡSynthesisǡ1987ǡ12ǡ ͳͳʹͺǦͳͳ͵ͲǤ ͳʹ ǤǦǤǡ ǤǤǡ ǤǤ ǡJ. Chem. Soc., Perkin TransǤ 1ǡ 1990ǡ ͷǦͷͻǤ ͳ͵ ǤǡǤ ǡǤǡSynthesisǡ2006ǡ2ǡ͵ͲͻǦ͵ͳͶǤ ͳͶ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Chem. ComǦ munǤǡ2009ǡ12ǡͳͷͶǦͳͷǤ ͳͷ ǤǡǤǤ ǡǤǡOrg.ProcessRes.DevǤǡ2006ǡ 10ǡͻͷͻǦͻͲ Ǥ ͳ Ǥ ǤǡǤǤǡǤǡǤǡǤǡǤ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ǤǤǡOrg.ProcessRes.Dev.ǡ2003ǡ7ǡͷʹͳǦͷ͵ʹǤ
ͺͳ
ͳ PrudentPracticesintheLaboratory:HandlingandDisposalofChemicalsǡ ǡ1995ǡǤ͵ͶͺǦ͵ͶͻǤ ͳͺ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Studies in Organic Chemistry 1: Complex Hydridesǡ ǡ 1979ǢȌ ǤǦǡReductionsbyAluminoǦandBoroǦhydridesin OrganicSynthesisǡ Ǧ ƬǤ ǡ1991Ǥ ͳͻ ȌǤǡǤ ǡǤ ǡTetrahedronLettǤǡ1976ǡ17ǡ͵ǦǢ ȌǤǤǡǤǤ ǡǤ ǤǡJ.Chem.Soc.,PerkinTrans.1ǡ 1980ǡ1ǡͻǦͳͲͳǢ Ȍ Ǥ ǤǡǤǡǤǤǡSynthesisǡ1986ǡ6ǡ ͶͻͶǦͶͻͻǢȌ ǤǤ ÀǡǤǤÀǡ Ǥ ǤÀǡǤǤǦ ǡǤǡJ.Org.Chem.ǡ1992ǡ57ǡͶʹͳͷǦͶʹʹͶǤ ʹͲ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ±ǡ Ǥ Ǧ±ǡ Ǥǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Tetrahedron LettǤǡ 2011ǡ 52ǡ ͶͲʹǦͶͲͷǤ ʹͳ ǤǡǤǡǤǡǤǡǤ ǡTetrahedronLettǤǡ1969ǡ 52ǡͶͷͷͷǦͶͷͷͺǤ ʹʹ ǤǤǡǤǤǡ ǤǤǡ ǤǤǡJ.KoreanChem.SocǤǡ1983ǡ27ǡ Ͷ͵ͶǦͶͶͲǤ ʹ͵ ǤǤǡǤ ǡJ.Org.ChemǤǡ1973ǡ38ǡͻͳʹǦͻͳǤ ʹͶ Ǥ ǤǡǤǤǡǤ ǤǡJ.Org.ChemǤǡ1968ǡ33ǡ͵͵Ǧ͵͵ͻǤ ʹͷ ȌǤǤǤǡ ǤǤǤǡǤǡTetrahedronǡ 1992ǡ 48ǡ Ͷʹ͵ǦͶʹͺǢ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Angew. Chem. Int. EdǤǡ 1989ǡ 28ǡ ʹͳͺǦʹʹͲǢ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1ǡ 1991ǡͶͻǦͶͺʹǢȌǤǤǡǤǤǡǤǤǡJ.Org.ChemǤǡ 1981ǡ46ǡʹͷͻǦʹͷͺͳǤ ʹ Ȍ ǤǡSynthesisǡ1975ǡ9ǡͳǦ͵ͲǢȌǤǡǤ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Justus Liebigs Ann. ChemǤǡ 1959ǡ 623ǡ ͻǦͳǢ Ȍ ǤǤ ͵ǡͳͶ͵ǡͷͶʹ ȋǤ et alǤǡ 1964ȌǢ Ȍ ǤǤ ʹͲͲͷȀͲͲʹͻͺ͵ͳȋǡ2005ȌǤ ʹ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Bull. Korean Chem. SocǤǡ 2009ǡ 30ǡ ʹͺʹͷǦʹͺʹǤ ʹͺ Ȍ ǤǤǡǤ ǤǡJ.Am.Chem.Soc.ǡ1964ǡ86ǡͳͲͻǦͳͲͺͷǢȌ ǤǤ ǡǤǤ ǡJ.Am.Chem.SocǤǡ1964ǡ86ǡͳͲͺͷǦͳͲͺͻǢ Ȍ ǤǤǡ ǤǡJ.Am.Chem.SocǤǡ1964ǡ86ǡͳͲͺͻǦͳͲͻͷǤ ʹͻ ǡǤǤǡTetrahedronLettǤǡ1981ǡ22ǡ͵ͺͳͷǦ͵ͺͳͺǤ ͵Ͳ Ǥǡ ǤǤ ǡǤ ǤǡAngew.Chem.Int.Ed.ǡ1999ǡ 38ǡ͵ͷͶʹǦ͵ͷͶͷǤ ͵ͳ ǤǡǤǡChem.RevǤǡ2014ǡ114ǡͷͶǦͷͷͳͲǤ ͵ʹ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Catalysis Without Precious Metalsǡ Ǧ ƬǤ ǡ2010ǡǤͷͳǦͺͳǤ ͵͵ Ǥǡ ǤǡǤǡǤǡ ǤǡChem.Soc.RevǤǡ 2016ǡ45ǡͺͷǦͻǤ
ͺʹ
͵Ͷ ǤǡǤǡ ǤǡǤǡǤǡǤǡ ǤǡǤ ǡ Chem.Eur.J.ǡ2017ǡ23ǡͷͶǦͷͶͺǤ ͵ͷ ǤǦǤǡ ǤǦ ǤǡǤǦǤǡChemCatChemǡ2016ǡ8ǡ͵Ͳ͵Ǧ͵ͲͶͲǤ ͵ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ The Chemistry of Organic Silicon Compoundsǡ Ǧ Ƭ Ǥ ǡ 1989Ǣ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Comprehensive HandǦ bookonHydrosilylationǡǡ1992Ǣ Ȍ Ǥǡ ǤǡǤ ǡ Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesisǡ Ǧ Ƭ Ǥ ǡ1993ǡǤ͵Ͳ͵Ǧ͵ʹʹǢȌ ǤǡǤ ǡCatalyticAsymmetric Synthesisǡ Ǧ ƬǤ ǡ2000ǡǤͳͳͳǦͳͶ͵Ǥ ͵ Ǥǡ ǤǤǡOrg.ProcessRes.DevǤǡ2016ǡ20ǡͳͳͶǦͳͳͺͳǤ ͵ͺ ǤǤǡOrg.ProcessRes.DevǤǡ2010ǡ14ǡͶͺͶǦͶͺͶǤ ͵ͻ ȌǤ Ǥ ǡǤǤǡǤǤǡJ.Chem.Soc.,PerkinTrans.1ǡ 1999ǡ ͵͵ͺͳǦ͵͵ͻͳǢ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ J. Am. Chem. Soc.ǡ 1999ǡ 121ǡ ͳͷͺǦͳǢ ȌǤǤǡSynlettǡ2005ǡ12ǡͳͻͲǦͳͻͳǢȌ ǤǤǡǤǤ Ǧ ǡ Polymethylhydrosiloxane, eǦEROS Encyclopedia of Reagents for OrǦ ganicSynthesis, ƬǡǤǡ2003ǢȌǤǡǤǡSilǦ icones:Preparation,PropertiesandPerformanceǡǦ ǡ2005Ǥ ͶͲ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Tetrahedron LettǤǡ 1998ǡ 39ǡ ͳͲͳǦͳͲʹͲǢ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Chem. ComǦ mun.ǡ 2007ǡ 46ǡ ͶͻͳǦͶͻͳͺǢ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥǡ J. Am. Chem. Soc.ǡ 2009ǡ 131ǡ ͳͷͲ͵ʹǦͳͷͲͶͲǢ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ ǤǡJ.Am.Chem.Soc.ǡ2012ǡ134ǡͳͳ͵ͲͶǦͳͳ͵ͲǢȌǤǡǤǡ Ǥ ǡǤ ǡǤ ǡǤ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ǤǡAngew.Chem.Int.EdǤǡ2015ǡ54ǡͳʹ͵ͺͻǦͳʹ͵ͻ͵Ǥ Ͷͳ ȌǤǡ ǤǡǤ ǡǤǡ ǤǡAnǦ gew.Chem.Int.EdǤǡ2009ǡ48ǡͻͷͳͳǦͻͷͳͶǢȌǤǡǤǡǤǡ Ǥ ǡǤǡAngew.Chem.Int.EdǤǡ2012ǡ51ǡͳʹǦͳǢ Ȍ ǤǦ ǡǤǡ ǤǡChem.CommunǤǡ2011ǡ47ǡͷͺͳǦͷͺ͵Ǣ ȌǤ±ǡ ǤǤǡ ǤǦǤǡǤ ǡChemCatChemǡ2011ǡ 3ǡͳͶǦͳͷͲǢȌǤǡǤǡ ǤǡEur.J.Org.ChemǤǡ 2013ǡʹͲǦʹͲͲǢȌǤǡǤ ǡǤǡǤǡǤǡAngew. Chem.Int.EdǤǡ2009ǡ48ǡͻͷͲǦͻͷͳͲǢȌǤǡ ǤǡǤǡǤ Ǧ ǡ ǤǤǡǤǡJ.Am.Chem.SocǤǡ2013ǡ135ǡͳͺͳͲͺǦͳͺͳʹͲǢȌ ǤǡǤǡAppl.Organomet.ChemǤǡ2010ǡ24ǡͷͳǦͷǤ Ͷʹ ȌǤǡǤǡǤǡǤ ǡǤǡJ.Am.Chem.SocǤǡ2010ǡ ͳ͵ʹǡ ͳͲǦͳͳǢ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Chem. Eur. JǤǡ 2011ǡ 17ǡ ͳʹͳͺǦͳʹͳͻʹǢ Ȍ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Org.Lett.ǡ2015ǡ17ǡͶͶǦͶͶͻǤ Ͷ͵ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ǤǡChem.Eur.J.ǡ2011ǡ17ǡͳͺǦͳʹǤ
ͺ͵
ͶͶ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ǤǦǤ ǡ Adv. Synth. CatalǤǡ 2013ǡ 355ǡ͵͵ͷͺǦ͵͵ʹǤ Ͷͷ ǤǡǤǡǤǡ ǤǡǤǡǤǡ TetrahedronLettǤǡ2015ǡ56ǡͶͶͺǦͶͷͳǤ Ͷ ǤǤǡǤ ǡǤǡǤǤǡACSCatalǤǡ2015ǡ5ǡ ͶʹͳͻǦͶʹʹǤ Ͷ ȌǤǡ ǤǤǡǤ ǡǤǡǤ ǡǤǡ Ǥ ò ǡ Ǥ ǡ Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.ǡ 2013ǡ 52ǡ ͳͳͷǦͳͳͷͺͲǢ ȌǤǤ ǡǤǡǤǡǤǡJ.Org.ChemǤǡ2014ǡ79ǡ ʹͺǦ͵͵Ǣ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Chem. CommunǤǡ 2014ǡ 50ǡ ͻ͵ͶͻǦͻ͵ͷʹǤ Ͷͺ Ǥ Ǥǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡJ.Am.Chem.SocǤǡ1965ǡ87ǡͳǦʹͳǤ Ͷͻ ǤǡǤǤǡAngew.Chem.Int.EdǤǡ1988ǡ27ǡʹͺͻǦʹͻͳǤ ͷͲ Ȍ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Organometallicsǡ 1992ǡ 11ǡ ͻͲǦͻͺǢ ȌǤǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥǡ Organometallicsǡ 2002ǡ 21ǡ ͵ͺͺǦ͵ͺͲʹǢ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǧ ǡǤǡǤǡǤ ǡǤǡǤǡ J.Organomet.ChemǤǡ1975ǡ94ǡͶͶͻǦͶͳǤ ͷͳ ǤǡǤ ǡModernReductionMethodsǡ Ǧ ƬǤ ǡ2008ǡǤͳͻ͵ǦʹͲǤ ͷʹ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Organometallicsǡ 2010ǡ 29ǡ ͲͷǦͲͶǢ ȌǤǡǤǡJ.Am.Chem.Soc.ǡ2012ǡ134ǡͶͲǦͷ͵Ǥ ͷ͵ ǤǡǤǡǤǡǤǡǤǡǤǡǤǦ ǡ ǤǡOrganometallicsǡ2015ǡ34ǡͶͺͻͷǦͶͻͲǤ ͷͶ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Dalton TransǤǡ 2015ǡ44ǡͳͻ͵ͶͶǦͳͻ͵ͷǤ ͷͷ Ȍ ǤǤ ǡǤǡǤ ǤǡǤǤǡ ǤǤǡ J. Org. ChemǤǡ 1978ǡ 43ǡ ͵ͶǦ͵ͷǢ Ȍ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ ǤǤǡǤ ǤǡǤǤ ǡJ.Organomet.ChemǤǡ1976ǡ117ǡ ͳʹͻǦͳͶͲǤ ͷ Ȍ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ J. Am. Chem. SocǤǡ 1996ǡ 118ǡ ͻͶͶͲǦͻͶͶͳǢ ȌǤ Ǥǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ J. Org. ChemǤǡ 2000ǡ 65ǡ ͵ͲͻͲǦ͵ͲͻͺǢ ȌǤǡǤ ǡAngew.Chem.Int.Ed.ǡ2008ǡ47ǡ ͷͻͻǦͲͲͲǤ ͷ ǤǤǡǤ ǡJ.Am.Chem.SocǤǡ1964ǡ86ǡ͵ͷǦ͵ͷǤ ͷͺ ǤǡǤǤǡǤǤǡKirkǦOthmerEncyclopediaofChemiǦ cal Technologyǡ Ǧ Ƭ Ǥ ǡ 1992ǡ Ǥ ʹͲǦ ͵ͲͲǤ ͷͻ ǤǤǡǤ Ǥǡ ǤǤǡǤǤǡǤǤǡOrg. ProcessRes.DevǤǡ2000ǡ4ǡͶǦͶʹǤ Ͳ ǤǡǤǤǡJ.Am.Chem.SocǤǡ2008ǡ130ǡͳͺǦͳͻǤ
ͺͶ
ͳ ǤǡǤǤ ǡǤǤǡJ. Am. Chem. SocǤǡ 2010ǡ 132ǡ ͳʹͺͳǦͳʹͺͳͻǤ ʹ ǤǦǤ ǡǤǦǤǡǤǦǤǡJ.Org.ChemǤǡ2016ǡ81ǡͶʹ͵ͷǦͶʹͶ͵Ǥ ͵ Ǥ ǡ ǤǦǤDž ǡ ǤǡǤ ǡSynthesisǡ2014ǡ 46ǡʹͷͲǦʹͷͳͶǤ Ͷ Ȍ ǤǦǤ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Org. Chem. FrontǤǡ 2015ǡ 2ǡ ͳͷͲǦͳͷͺǢ Ȍ ǤǦǤ ǡǤǦ Ǥǡ Ǥǡ ǤǦǤǡSynlettǡ2010ǡͳͺʹͻǦͳͺ͵ʹǤ ͷ ǤǡǤǡ ǤǡOrganometallicsǡ2011ǡ30ǡͺǦǤ ǤǡǤǡǤǡǤǡǤ ǡǤǡǤǡ Chem.Eur.J.ǡ2016ǡ22ǡ͵͵ͲͲǦ͵͵Ͳ͵Ǥ ǤǡǤ ǡǤ ǡǤǡChem.CommunǤǡ2012ǡ48ǡʹͺ͵ǦʹͺͷǤ ͺ ǤǡǤǡǤǦǤǡǤ ǡǤǡChem. Eur. JǤǡ 2016ǡ 22ǡ ͲͷͲǦͲͷ͵Ǥ ͻ Ǥǡ ǤǡǤǡ Ǥǡ Ǥǡ Chem.Commun.ǡ2014ǡ50ǡͳͶͷͲͺǦͳͶͷͳͳǤ Ͳ ǤǡǤǡJ.Org.Chem.ǡ1987ǡ52ǡʹͷǦʹͷͺͲǤ ͳ ǤǡǤǡǤǡǤǡ Ǥǡ Ǥ ǡ Chem.Eur.J.ǡ2017ǡ23ǡʹͲͲͷǦʹͲͲͻǤ ʹ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ J. Am. Chem. SocǤǡ 2000ǡ 122ǡ ͳͳͻͻͷǦͳͳͻͻǤ ͵ ǤǤǡ ǤǤǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡTetrahedron LettǤǡ 2004ǡ 45ǡ ʹͺǦʹͺͻǤ Ͷ ǤǤǡ ǤǤǡǤǤǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡJ.Am.Chem.SocǤǡ 2007ǡ129ǡ͵ͶͲͺǦ͵ͶͳͻǤ ͷ ǤǡǤ ǡOrg.LettǤǡ2014ǡ16ǡ͵ͻͲǦ͵ͻ͵Ǥ ǤǡǤǤǡǤǤ ǡAngew.Chem.Int.Ed.ǡ1996ǡ35ǡ ͳͷͳͷǦͳͷͳǤ ȌǤ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ber. Dtsch. Chem. GesǤǡ 1893ǡ 26ǡ ͳͻͲ͵ǦͳͻͲͺǢ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ber. Dtsch. Chem. GesǤǡ 1927ǡ 60ǡ ͳͳͻǦͳʹʹǢ Ȍ ǤǤǡǤǤǡJ.Chem.SocǤǡ1931ǡʹͶͶǦʹͶͷǤ ͺ ǤòǡAngew.Chem.Int.EdǤǡ1962ǡ1ǡͶǦͷʹǤ ͻ Ǥ ǡǤ ǡǤǡ ǤǡChem.BerǤǡ1959ǡ92ǡ ͺ͵ǦͺͶͻǤ ͺͲ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ ǤǡJ.Am.Chem.SocǤǡ1926ǡ48ǡ͵ʹǦ͵Ǥ ͺͳ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ ǤǤ ǡJ.Am.Chem.SocǤǡ1954ǡ76ǡͻʹͲǦͻʹʹǤ ͺʹ Ǥ ǡǤ«ǡǤ ǡEur.J.Org.ChemǤǡ2013ǡͷ͵ͺͳǦͷ͵ͺǤ ͺ͵ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ J. Org. ChemǤǡ 2015ǡ 80ǡ ͶͲ͵ǦͶͳͳǤ ͺͶ ǤǦǤ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǧǡ Ǥ ǡ Angew. Chem. Int.EdǤǡ1981ǡ20ǡͺͻǦͺͺͲǤ ͺͷ ǤǤǡǤ ǡCan.J.Chem.ǡ2001ǡ79ǡͳͻͶǦͳͲ͵Ǥ
ͺͷ
ͺ Ǣ ȌǤǤǡChem.RevǤǡ1988ǡ88ǡͻ͵ǦͺͳͳǢȌǤǡǤǡ Ǥ ǡ Chem. Asian J.ǡ 2011ǡ 6ǡ ʹʹʹͶǦʹʹ͵ͻǢ Ȍ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǤǡǤǤǡTetrahedronǡ2000ǡ56ǡ͵ͲǦ͵ͳͳͻǤ ͺ ǤǤǡǤǡJ.Org.Chem.ǡ2009ǡ74ǡͳ͵ͶͳǦͳ͵ͶͶǤ ͺͺ ǤǡǤ ǡǤ ±ǡǤǡAngew.Chem.Int.EdǤǡ2014ǡ 53ǡͷͶʹǦͷͶǤ ͺͻ ǢȌǤǡǤ ǡǤǡJ.Am.Chem. SocǤǡ2013ǡ135ǡͳͶͻͺǦͳͶͻͳǢȌǤǤ ǡǤ Ǥ ǡǤ ǤǡǤ ǡǤǤǡJ.Org.Chem.ǡ2015ǡ80ǡʹͺͳǦʹͺͺǤ ͻͲ ǤǡǤǡǤǡǤǡǤ ǡǤǦ ǡJ.Am.Chem.SocǤǡ2016ǡ138ǡͺ͵ͶͺǦͺ͵ͷͳǤ ͻͳ ǤǤ ǡ ǤǡǤǤǡNat.ChemǤǡ2012ǡ4ǡʹʹͺǦʹ͵ͶǤ ͻʹ ǤǦǤ ǡǤǦ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ǤǦǤǡSci. RepǤǡ 2016ǡ 6ǡ ʹͺͺͲͳǦʹͺͺͳͲǤ ͻ͵ ǤǤ ǡǤ Ǥ ǡǤ ǤǡJ.Org.ChemǤǡ2016ǡ81ǡͻͲʹͲǦͻͲʹǤ ͻͶ Ǥ Ǥǡ ǤǤǡǤǤǡǤǡǤǤ ǡAngew.Chem.Int.EdǤǡ 2010ǡ49ǡ͵Ͳ͵Ǧ͵ͲͶͲǤ ͻͷ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Angew. Chem. Int. EdǤǡ 2012ǡ 51ǡ ͺ͵ͳͶǦͺ͵ͳǤ ͻ ǤǡǤ±ǡǤǤ ǡǤǤǡOrg. LettǤǡ 2015ǡ 17ǡ ͵͵ͺǦ͵͵ͺͻǤ ͻ ǤǡǤǡǤǡǤǡAngew.Chem.Int.EdǤǡ 2017ǡ56ǡͷͻʹͳǦͷͻʹͷǤ ͻͺ Ǥ±ǡǤǤ ǡǤǤǡJ. Org. ChemǤǡ 2016ǡ 81ǡ ͳͲ͵ͶͺǦͳͲ͵ͷǤ ͻͻ ǤǦǤ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ǤǦ Ǥ ǡ ǤǦǤ ǡ Chem. CommunǤǡ 2014ǡ 50ǡ ͺͳǦͺ͵Ǥ ͳͲͲ Ȍ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Angew. Chem. Int. EdǤǡ 2012ǡ 51ǡ ͶͷʹǦͶͷǢ Ȍ Ǥ ±ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǧ ǡ J.Org.ChemǤǡ 2012ǡ 77ǡ ͵ʹͳͷǦ͵ʹʹͳǢ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ±ǡ Ǥ±ǡJ.Org.ChemǤǡ2016ǡ81ǡͻʹͶǦͻʹͺǤ ͳͲͳ ǤǦǤ ǡǤǦǤǡǤǦǤ ǡJ.Org.ChemǤǡ2016ǡ81ǡͳͲʹʹǦͳͲʹ͵ͷǤ ͳͲʹ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Org. LettǤǡ 2012ǡ 14ǡ ͻͷͲǦͻͷ͵Ǣ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥǡ Org. Biomol. ChemǤǡ 2014ǡ 12ǡ ͵ͳͶǦ͵ͳͷͲǢ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥǡ Chem. Eur.JǤǡ2014ǡ20ǡͳͷͷǦͳͷͳǤ ͳͲ͵ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ǤǡǤǤAngew.Chem.Int.EdǤǡ2014ǡ53ǡͷͳʹǦͷͳǤ ͳͲͶ Ǥ ǡǤǡǤǡǤǡǤǡOrg.LettǤǡ2013ǡ15ǡ ͵ͶͷʹǦ͵ͶͷͷǤ
ͺ
ͳͲͷ Ȍ ǤǤ ǡǤ ǡǤǡǤ ǡǤ Ǥǡ Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.ǡ 2017ǡ 56ǡ ͵ͷͷǦ͵ͷͻǢ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ ǤǦ Ǥ ǡ Chem.Sci.ǡ2017ǡinpressǡ ǣͳͲǤͳͲ͵ͻȀ Ͳ͵ͳ͵Ǥ ͳͲ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Angew. Chem. Int. EdǤǡ 2016ǡ 55ǡ ͳ͵Ͷ͵Ǧͳ͵ͶͶͲǤ ͳͲ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Chem.Eur.J.,2015ǡ21ǡͳͳͳǦͳͳͶǤ ͳͲͺ ǤǦǤ ǡǤǡ Ǥ ǡChem.CommunǤǡ2016ǡ52ǡͳͳͻǦͳͳͻͲǤ ͳͲͻ ǤǡǤǡǤǡOrg.LettǤǡ2015ǡ17ǡͳͻǦͳͻͻǤ ͳͳͲ ǤǡǤǡǤ ǡǤǡǤǡǤ,J.Am. Chem.SocǤǡ2016ǡ138ǡͷʹͶǦͷʹͶͻǤ
ͳͳͳ Ǧ ȋȌ ͳͲ ͺͲ ι ͲιǤ ͳͳʹ ǤǦǡ ǤǤǡǤǤǡǤ ǤǡJ.Am.Chem.Soc.ǡ 2012ǡ134ǡͺͶͺǦͺͷͳǤ ͳͳ͵ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2011ǡ 50ǡ ͲͲͶǦͲͳͳǤ ͳͳͶ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Eur. J. Org. Chem.ǡ 2008ǡ ͶͲͻǦͶͳͲͲǤ ͳͳͷ Ǥ Ǥ ǡOrg.ProcessRes.Dev.,2007ǡ11ǡͳͷǦͳͷͻǤ ͳͳ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ǤǡJ.Am.Geriatr.Soc.ǡ2003ǡ51ǡ͵ǦͶͶǤ ͳͳ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ J. Am. Chem. Soc.ǡ 1954ǡ 76ǡ ʹͲʹͻǦʹͲ͵ͲǢ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ J. Am. Chem. Soc.ǡ 1956ǡ 78ǡ ͷͳʹͺǦͷͳʹͻǢ Ȍ ǤǡǤǡ Ǥǡ Ǥ ǡǤ ǡ J.Am.Chem. Soc.ǡ 1963ǡ 85ǡ ʹͲǦʹʹʹǢ Ȍ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Enamines; Synthesis, Structure and Reactionsǡ ǡ Ǥǡ 1998Ǣ ȌǤǡ ǤǤǡǤ ǡǤǡChem.Rev.ǡ2007ǡ107ǡ ͷͶͳǦͷͷͻǤ ͳͳͺ ǤǦ Ǥ ǡ ǤǦ Ǥ ǡ ǤǦǤ ǡ ǤǦǤ ǡ J. Am. Chem. Soc.ǡ 2008ǡ 131ǡ ͳ͵Ǧͳ͵Ǥ ͳͳͻ Ǥ ǡ ǤǡBer.Dtsch.Chem.Ges.ǡ1936ǡ69ǡʹͳͲǦʹͳͳʹǤ ͳʹͲ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ J. Org. Chem.ǡ 2006ǡ 71ǡ ͶͺͳǦͶͺͶǤ ͳʹͳ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Eur. J. Org. Chem.ǡ 2004ǡ 10ǡ ͶͻͶǦͷͲǢ Ȍ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Org. Lett.ǡ 2005ǡ 7ǡ ͶͶʹǦͶͶ͵ͲǢ Ȍ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Chem.Commun.ǡ 2005ǡ 8ǡ ͻ͵ǦͻͺǢ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Org.Lett.ǡ2012ǡ14ǡͶͷͲǦͶͷ͵Ǥ ͳʹʹ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.ǡ 2003ǡ42ǡͷͳͷǦͷͳͻǤ ͳʹ͵ Ǥǡ Ǥǡ ǤǡOrg.Lett.ǡ2014ǡ16ǡͺͲǦͺ͵Ǥ
ͺ
ͳʹͶ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Eur. J. Org. Chem.ǡ2016ǡʹͲǦʹ͵Ǥ ͳʹͷ ͳ εͳͲ transǤ ǤǤ ǡǤǤ ǡJ.Org.Chem.ǡ1970ǡ35ǡʹͳͳ͵ǦʹͳͳǤ ͳʹ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡǤǤ ǡ ǤǤǡǤǡǤǤǡǤǤǡǤǡGreenChem.ǡ 2008ǡ10ǡ͵ͳǦ͵ǢȌǤǡǤǡ Ǥ ǡ ǤǡǤǤ ǡ ǤǦǡǤ ǤǡGreenChem.ǡ2016ǡ18ǡʹͺͺǦʹͻǤ ͳʹ ǤǤǡǤǤ ǡJ.Phys.Chem.ǡ1987ǡ91ǡʹͳǦʹʹͳǤ ͳʹͺ ǤǡǤ Ǥ ǡǤ Ǥǡ ǤǡJ.Org.Chem.ǡ1967ǡ32ǡ ͳͳͳͳǦͳͳͳͷǤ ͳʹͻ Ȍ Ǥ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ ǤǤǤǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Pharm. Res.ǡ 1996ǡ 13ǡ ͳͻǦͳͺʹǢ ȌǤǤǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǧǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡBiorg.Med.Chem.ǡ1996ǡ4ǡͳͷǦͳͺǢ ȌǤǤǡCurr.Med. Chem.ǡ2003ǡ10ǡʹͲͺͳǦʹͳͲͺǤ ͳ͵Ͳ Ǣ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡInflammCellSignalǡ2014ǡ1:e95Ǥ ͳ͵ͳ ȌǤòòǡ ǤçǡǤǡǤǡEur.J.Med.Chem.ǡ2012ǡ 48ǡʹͻǦ͵ͲͶǢȌǤǡǤǡǤÚǡǤǡChem.SciǤǡ2016ǡ7ǡ ͳ͵ǦͳͺǢ ȌǤǡǤǡǤǤ Ǧ ǡJ.Am.Chem.SocǤǡ 2013ǡ135ǡʹǦ͵ʹǢȌǤǤǡǤǡǤæǡAdv.HetǦ erocycl.Chem.ǡ1984ǡ37ǡʹͳǦ͵ͶͻǢȌǤǡ1,3ǦDipolarCycloaddition Chemistryǡ ǡ1984Ǥ ͳ͵ʹ ȌǤǡǤǤǡChem.RevǤǡ2008ǡ108ǡʹͻͷʹǦ͵ͲͳͷǦ ǢȌ ǤǤ ǡ ǤǤǡǤǤǡǤǤ ǡ ǤǤ ǡAngew.Chem.Int.Ed.ǡ2009ǡ48ǡͺͲͳͺǦͺͲʹͳǢ ȌǤǤǡ ǤǤǡǤǤ ǡAngew.Chem.Int.Ed.ǡ2013ǡ52ǡͳ͵Ͳ͵Ǧͳ͵ͲͶͳǤ ͳ͵͵ ǡ ǢǤ¡ǡǤ ǡǤǡǤǡ Angew.Chem.Int.Ed.ǡ2005ǡ44ǡͷͳͺͺǦͷʹͶͲǤ ͳ͵Ͷ ǤǡJustusLiebigsAnn.Chem.ǡ1912ǡ394ǡͷͻǦͺǤ ͳ͵ͷ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Úǡ Chem. Ber.ǡ 1966ǡ 99ǡ ͶͷǦͶͻͲǢ ȌǤ ǡǤǡǤǡ Ǥǡ Ǥ̵±ǡTetrahedronǡ 1971ǡ27ǡ͵ͷʹǦ͵ͷ͵ͶǤ ͳ͵ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ J. Org. Chem.ǡ 1991ǡ 53ǡ ͻͶǦͻͶͺǤ ͳ͵ Ȍ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ J. Am. Chem. Soc.ǡ 1964ǡ 86ǡ ʹʹͳ͵ǦʹʹͳǢ ȌǤǤǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ J. Org. ChemǤǡ 1975ǡ 40ǡ ͺͳͻǦͺʹͶǢ ȌǤǤǡǤǤǡǤǤ ǡJ.Org.Chem.ǡ2013ǡ78ǡͳͷǦͳͷͺʹǢ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Bull. Chem. Soc. JpnǤǡ
ͺͺ
1981ǡ54ǡʹͳǦʹǢȌ Ǥǯ±ǡChem.Rev.ǡ1969ǡ69ǡ͵ͶͷǦ͵͵Ǧ Ǥ ͳ͵ͺ Ǥ ǡǤ ǡǤǤ ǡǤǡGazz.Chim.ItalǤǡ1967ǡ97ǡ ͵ͲͶǦ͵ʹͲǤ ͳ͵ͻ ǤǡǤ ǡGazz.Chim.Ital.ǡ1969ǡ99ǡͳͳ͵ͳǦͳͳ͵Ǥ ͳͶͲ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Chem. CommunǤǡ 2016ǡ52ǡʹͺͺͷǦʹͺͺͺǢȌǤǡǤǡǤǡ Ǥ ǡǤǡǤǡ Eur. J. Org. Chem.ǡ 2016ǡ 10ǡ ͳͺͺǦͳͺͻͲǢ Ȍ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ ǤǤǡChem.Eur.J.ǡ2013ǡ19ǡͳ͵ͳͷǦͳ͵ͳͺͳǢȌǤ ǤǤ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Chem. Eur. J.ǡ 2011ǡ 17ǡ ͵ͷͺͶǦ͵ͷͺǢ ȌǤǡǤǡ ǤǦǤǡǤǡChem.Eur.J.ǡ2011ǡ17ǡ ͳʹͻͳǦͳʹͻʹͳǢȌǤǡ ǤǡǤǡSynthesisǡ2017ǡ49ǡ ͶͳͻͳǦͶͳͻͺǤ ͳͶͳ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Org. Lett.ǡ 2016ǡ 18ǡ ʹͺͲǦʹͺ͵Ǣ ȌǤǡǤǤ ǡǤ ǤǡǤ ǡAngew. Chem. Int. Ed.ǡ 2014ǡ 53ǡ ͻͲʹͳǦͻͲʹͷǢ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ äǡ Ǥ ǡ Tetrahedron Lett.ǡ 2004ǡ 45ǡ ͵ͲͳǦ͵ͲʹǢ Ȍ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Tetrahedronǡ 1969ǡ 25ǡ ͵Ͳͷ͵Ǧ͵ͲǢ Ȍ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Tetrahedronǡ 1966ǡ 22ǡ ʹͶͷ͵Ǧ ʹͶͲǤ ͳͶʹ ȌǤǡǤ ǡǤǤǡ ǤǡChem.Eur.J.ǡ2003ǡ9ǡʹʹͲͻǦ ʹʹͳͺǢȌǤǤ ǡTetrahedronǡ1982ǡ38ǡ͵͵͵Ǧ͵ͶͶǤ ͳͶ͵ Ȍ ǤǤ ǡǤǡProg.Med.Chem.ǡ1993ǡ30ǡʹͲ͵Ǧ͵ʹǢȌǤǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Eur. J. Med. Chem.ǡ 2013ǡ 59ǡ ǦͳͶǢ ȌǤǤ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡǤ Ǥ ǡJ.Med.Chem.ǡ2009ǡ52ǡ͵ͳʹ͵Ǧ͵ͳͶͳǤ ͳͶͶ Ȍ ǤǦǤ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ ǤǦ Ǥ ǡ ǤǦǤ ǡ J.Am.Chem.Soc.ǡ2011ǡ133ǡʹʹʹǦʹʹͺǢȌǤǤǡǤ Ǥǡ Ǥǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ ǤǦǤ ǡ Bioorg.Med. Chem. Lett.ǡ 2010ǡ 20ǡ ͷͶͳǦͷͶͷǢ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥǡ Ǥǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Bioorg. Med. Chem.ǡ 2012ǡ 20ǡ ͵ͺͶ͵Ǧ͵ͺͶͻǢ ȌǤ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ ǤǤǡ Bioorg. Med.Chem. Lett.ǡ 2013ǡ 23ǡ ͳǦ͵Ǣ Ȍ ǤǦǤ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ ǤǤǡ ǤǦ Ǥ ǡ Ǥǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.ǡ 2011ǡ 21ǡ ʹǦʹͻǢ Ȍ ǤǦ Ǥǡ ǤǦǤ ǡ ǤǦǤ ǡ ǤǦǤ ǡ ǤǦǤǡ ǤǦǤǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ǤǦǤ ǡ ǤǦǤ ǡ ǤǦǤǡ ǤǦ ǤǡǤ ǡǤǤǦ ǡǤǦǤǡǤǦǤǡǤǦǤǡ ǤǦǤǡǤǦǤǡǤǦ Ǥ,J.Med.Chem.ǡ2014ǡ57ǡͲͲͺǦͲͳͺǤ ͳͶͷ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Coord. Chem. Rev.ǡ 1994ǡ 133ǡ ʹͳͻǦ͵ͲͲǢ ȌǤ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Inorg.Chem.ǡ 2009ǡ 48ǡ ͳͲͺͲͲǦͳͲͺͳͲǢ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Úǡ Ǥ ǡǤ ǡǤ ǡǤǡǤéǡEur. J. Org. Chem.ǡ 2010ǡ Ͷͺͻ͵ǦͶͻͲͳǢ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ ǡ Dalton Trans.ǡ 2013ǡ 42ǡ
ͺͻ
ʹͺ͵ͳǦʹͺͶͲǢ Ȍ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ ǤǤǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Nat. Chem.ǡ 2016ǡ 8ǡ ͳͳʹǦͳͳ͵ͲǢ ȌǤ Ǥǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ J. Am. Chem. Soc.ǡ 2006ǡ 128ǡ ͳͶʹʹͲǦͳͶʹʹͳǢ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ TetrahedronLettǤǡ1997ǡ38ǡͷʹǦͷ͵ͲǤ ͳͶ ȌǤǤǡǤǤǡǤǡǤǡ Org.LettǤǡ2013ǡ 15ǡͳ͵͵ͶǦͳ͵͵ǢȌǤǡǤǡ ǤǡǤǡǤǡǤǡǤǡ ǤǡǤǡ ǤǡOrg. Lett.ǡ 2015ǡ 17ǡ ͵ͺʹǦ͵ͺͷǢ Ȍ ǤǦǤ ǡ ǤǦ ǤǡǤǦǤǡOrg.Lett.ǡ2014ǡ16ǡʹͺʹʹǦʹͺʹͷǢȌ ǤǡǤǡ ǤǡǤǡǤǡǤ ǡOrg. Lett.ǡ 2016ǡ 18ǡ ʹͶʹǦʹͶͷǢ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ×Ǧ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ÀǦǡ J.Org.Chem.ǡ 2013ǡ 78ǡ ͵ͶͷǦ͵Ͷ͵Ǣ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Org.Biomol.Chem.,2009ǡ7ǡʹͺͶͳǦʹͺͶǢȌǤǡǤǡǤǡ J.Am.Chem.Soc.ǡ2015ǡ137ǡͳʹͺͲͶǦͳʹͺͲǤ ͳͶ ǤǤǡǤ ǡTetrahedronLett.ǡ2000ǡ41ǡͳǦͳͺͲǤ ͳͶͺ ǤǡǤǡǤǤǡ Eur.J.Org.Chem.ǡ2014ǡ ͷͺͲǦͷͺͳͷǤ ͳͶͻ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ TetraheǦ dronLett.ǡ2016ǡ57ǡͷ͵ͷͳǦͷ͵ͷͶǤ ͳͷͲ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ GreenChemǤǡ2013ǡ15ǡʹʹͻͶǦʹ͵ͲͳǤ ͳͷͳ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Synlettǡ 2011ǡ 9ǡ ͳʹͺͳǦͳʹͺͶǢ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ J. Heterocycl. Chem.ǡ 1979ǡ16ǡͻʹͷǦͻʹǤ ͳͷʹ ǤǡǤǡǤǡAngew.Chem.Int.EdǤǡ2004ǡ43ǡ ͶͺǦͶͺʹǤ ͳͷ͵ ȌǤ ǡ Ǥ ǡǤ ǡǤǡChem.BerǤǡ1963ǡ96ǡͺͲʹǦͺͳʹǢ ȌǡǤǡǤǡǤǡǤ ǡ Ǥǡ Ǥ Ǧ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Eur.J.OrgChem.ǡ2014ǡ͵ͺͶǦ͵ͺͻǤ ͳͷͶ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Úǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ J. Am. Chem. SocǤǡ 2015ǡ137ǡʹͻͷͺǦʹͻǤ ͳͷͷ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ J. Am. Chem. SocǤǡ 2008ǡ 130ǡ ͳͶͲͶͺǦͳͶͲͶͻǤ ͳͷ ȌǤǡǤǦǤǡǤǡǤ ǡEur.J.Org.ChemǤǡ2009ǡʹͲͷͻǦʹͲʹǢ ȌǤǡǤ ǡǤǡǤǡǤǡǤǡǤǡǤǡOrg.LettǤǡ 2010ǡ12ǡͺͻǦͺͻͻǤ ͳͷ Ǧ ǢȌǤǤ ǡǤ ǤǡJ. Am. Chem. Soc.ǡ 2004ǡ 126ǡ ͳʹʹʹʹǦͳʹʹʹ͵ǢȌǤǤǡ ǤǤǦ ǡ ǤǤ ǡ ǤǤǡ J.Org.Chem.ǡ2016ǡ81ǡͷʹͺǦͷʹͺͶǤ
ͻͲ
ͳͷͺ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ ǤǤǤǡEur.J.Med.Chem.ǡ2017ǡ126ǡʹͳͺǦʹʹͶǢȌǤ ǡǤǡ ǤǡǤǡǤǡǤǡǤǡǤǡǤǤǡ ǤǤǡǤ ǡǤǡ ǤǤǤǡEur.J.Med.Chem.ǡ2016ǡ 123ǡ ͻͲǦͳͲͶǢ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥǡ Eur. J. Med. Chem.ǡ 2015ǡ 95ǡ ͻǦͳͲ͵Ǣ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ǤǤ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Eur. J. Med. Chem.ǡ 2014ǡ 77ǡ ͳʹͳǦͳ͵͵Ǣ ȌǡǤǡǤǤǡǤǤǡǤǤǡEur. J. Med. Chem.ǡ 2009ǡ44ǡ ͶͲǦͶʹǢ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ ǤǤ ǡ Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.ǡ 2009ǡ 19ǡ ͵͵ͲǦ͵͵͵Ǣ ȌǤǤǡǤǡǡǤǡǤǤǤǡǤ ǤǤǦ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2007ǡ 17ǡ ͵ͺǦͶʹǢ Ȍ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Int. J. Chem. Sci.ǡ 2007ǡ5ǡͷͶʹǦͷͶͺǢȌǤǤ ǡǤǤǡǤǡ Med. Chem. Res.ǡ 2007ǡ 15ǡ ͶͲǦͶͳǢ Ȍ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ ǤǡǤǤǡǤǤǡBioorg.Med.Chem.ǡ2003ǡ11ǡ Ͷͷ͵ͻǦͶͷͶͶǤ ͳͷͻ Ǥ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ Ǥǡ Synthesis of HeterocyclesviaCycloadditionsIǡǦǡ2008ǡǤͳǦͶͶǤ ͳͲ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ §Þǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ǤǤ ǡ Org.Lett.ǡ2005ǡ7ǡͷͶͳǦͷͶʹǤ ͳͳ ȌǤ ǡǤǡJ.Org.ChemǤǡ2008ǡ73ǡͻͳͺͳǦͻͳͺ͵ǢȌ ǤǤǡǤ ǤǡOrg.LettǤǡ2001ǡ3ǡͳͷͺǦͳͷͻͲǤ ͳʹ ǤǤ ǡǤǡǤǤǡǤǤǡJ.Am.Chem.SocǤǡ2005ǡ127ǡ ͷ͵Ǧͷ͵ͺ͵Ǥ ͳ͵ ǤǤǤǡǤǤǡǤǤǤǤǡTetrahedronǡ2010ǡ 66ǡͲͺǦͲͺͶǤ ͳͶ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ǤǦǤǡJ.Org.Chem.ǡ2010ǡ75ǡͲͷͲǦͲͷ͵ǢȌǤ Ǧ ǡǤǡ ǤǡǤǡǤǡǤǡOrg. Lett.ǡ 2002ǡ4ǡͳͻͲǦͳͻͳͲǤ ͳͷ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ J. Chem. Pharm.Res.ǡ2015ǡ7ǡʹͷͲǦʹͷǤ ͳ ȌǤ ǡ ǤǤǯ ǡǤ òǡNatureǡ1950ǡ166ǡʹʹǦʹʹǢ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ J. Am. Chem. Soc.ǡ 1960ǡ 82ǡ ͷ͵͵ͻǦͷ͵ͶʹǢ ȌǤ ǤǡǤǤǡǤ ǡJ.Org.Chem.ǡ1996ǡ 61ǡͺͷͷǦͺͳǢȌ ǤǦ Ǥ ǡǤǡǤ Ǥ ǡǤǡJ.Org.Chem.ǡ 1997ǡ62ǡͺͺǦͻʹǢȌǤǤ ±ǡǤ ǤǡǤǤǤǡǤ Ǥǡ Org.Lett.ǡ2005ǡ7ǡ͵ͳͻǦ͵ͳͺʹǢȌǤ ǡǤ ǡǤǡChem. Eur. J.ǡ 2010ǡ 16ǡ ͺǦͺͺ͵Ǣ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥǡ Ǥ ǡ Nippon Kagaku Kaishiǡ 2002ǡ 3ǡ ͶͳǦͶ͵Ǣ ȌǤǤǡǤǡǤǡ ǤǡǤǤǡ
ͻͳ
ǤǤǡ Org. Lett.ǡ 2009ǡ 11ǡ ͳͷ͵ͻǦͳͷͶʹǢ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Org. Lett.ǡ 2011ǡ 13ǡ ʹͻǦʹͻͻǢ ȌǤǡǤǤǡǤǤǡǤ ǤǡǤǤǡ ǤǤǡǤǤǡOrg.Lett.ǡ2013ǡ15ǡͶͲͳͲǦͶͲͳ͵ǢȌǤ ǡ ǤǡǤǡ ǤǡSynthesisǡ2014ǡ46ǡͷͲ͵ǦͷͲͻǤ ͳ ǤǤǡǤ ǤǡǤ ǡJ.Org.Chem.ǡ1964ǡ29ǡͳͷͺʹǦͳͷͺǤ ͳͺ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.ǡ 1968ǡ 41ǡ ʹʹͳʹǦʹʹͳͷǢ ȌǤ ǡǤǤǡǤ ǡǤǡJ.Heterocycl.ChemǤǡ1980ǡ 17ǡͺͺͳǦͺͺͷǤ ͳͻ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ J. Chem. Research (S)ǡ 1984ǡ͵Ǧ͵Ǥ ͳͲ ǤǦ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥǡ Ǥ Ǥǡ ǤǡSynlettǡ2013ǡ24ǡͻǦͺͶǤ ͳͳ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡSynth.CommunǤǡ2012ǡ42ǡ͵ͻǦͶͻǤ ͳʹ ǤǤǡ ǤǡJ.Comput.Chem.ǡ1998ǡ19ǡͳͻͷǦͳͺͲͶǤ ͳ͵ Ǥ ǡǤǡAdv.Synth.Catal.ǡ2015ǡ357ǡʹͷͺ͵ǦʹͳͶǤ ͳͶ ǤǡǤǡJ.Chem.Soc.,PerkinTrans.1ǡ1977ǡ3ǡʹ͵ͻǦʹͶǤ ͳͷ Ȍ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡǤǤǡ ǤǤǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Curr. Sci.ǡ 2006ǡ 90ǡ ͻ͵ǦͺͲ͵Ǣ ȌǤÏǡǤĂǡEur.J.Med.Chem.ǡ2015ǡ97ǡͷͺʹǦͳͳǢ ȌǤǤǡ ǤǤ ǡArch.Pharm.Pharm.Med.Chem.ǡ2002ǡ6ǡʹͺͻǦʹͻͷǤ ͳ ǤǤǡJ.Hetercyclic.Chem.ǡ1969ǡ6ǡʹͳǦʹͶǤ ͳ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ann. Univ. Sarav., Math. Naturwiss.FakǤǡ1981ǡ16ǡǦͳͺǤ ͳͺ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ J. Org. ChemǤǡ 2017ǡ 82ǡ ͷͺǦͷͺͺǤ ͳͻ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Phosphorus and Sulfur Relat. Elem.ǡ 1988ǡ35ǡͷǦ͵ͶǤ ͳͺͲ Ȍ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Z. ChemǤǡ 1987ǡ 27ǡ ͺǦͳͷǢ ȌǤǤǡ Ǥ Ǥǡ Ǥ Ǥ Ǥ Óǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Synth. Commun.ǡ1996ǡ26ǡͳͳͺǦͳͳͻǤ ͳͺͳ Ǥ ǡǤ ǡ ǤǡSynthesisǡ2000ǡ6ǡͺͲͷǦͺͲͺǤ ͳͺʹ ǤǡǤǤǡJ.Am.Chem.SocǤǡ1962ǡ84ǡͶͻͺͺǦͶͻͺͻǤ ͳͺ͵ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ J.Org. ChemǤǡ 2005ǡ 70ǡͷͻʹǦͲʹǤ ͳͺͶ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡChem.Eur.J.ǡ2015ǡ21ǡͳͺͻǦͳͺͻͲǤ
ͻʹ