DOCSLIB.ORG

ITALY © Gettyimages, Aleh Varanishcha

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ITALY © Gettyimages, Aleh Varanishcha ITALY © gettyimages, Aleh Varanishcha The Environmental Implementation Review 2019 COUNTRY REPORT – ITALY Environment EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 4.4.2019 SWD(2019) 123 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT The EU Environmental Implementation Review 2019 Country Report - ITALY Accompanying the document Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Environmental Implementation Review 2019: A Europe that protects its citizens and enhances their quality of life {COM(2019) 149 final} - {SWD(2019) 111 final} - {SWD(2019) 112 final} - {SWD(2019) 113 final} - {SWD(2019) 114 final} - {SWD(2019) 115 final} - {SWD(2019) 116 final} - {SWD(2019) 117 final} - {SWD(2019) 118 final} - {SWD(2019) 119 final} - {SWD(2019) 120 final} - {SWD(2019) 121 final} - {SWD(2019) 122 final} - {SWD(2019) 124 final} - {SWD(2019) 125 final} - {SWD(2019) 126 final} - {SWD(2019) 127 final} - {SWD(2019) 128 final} - {SWD(2019) 129 final} - {SWD(2019) 130 final} - {SWD(2019) 131 final} - {SWD(2019) 132 final} - {SWD(2019) 133 final} - {SWD(2019) 134 final} - {SWD(2019) 135 final} - {SWD(2019) 136 final} - {SWD(2019) 137 final} - {SWD(2019) 138 final} - {SWD(2019) 139 final} EN EN This report has been written by the staff of the Directorate-General for Environment, European Commission. Comments are welcome, please send them to [email protected] More information on the European Union is available at http://europa.eu. Photographs: p. 13 — ©GettyImages/DieterMeyrl, p. 15 — ©iStock/ueuaphoto, p. 18 — ©iStock/Aleh Varanishcha, p. 20 — ©iStock/fbxx, p. 29 — ©iStock/PARNTAWAN For reproduction or use of these photos, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holder. ©European Union, 2019 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. 1 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................... 3 PART I: THEMATIC AREAS ............................................................................................................................... 4 1. TURNING THE EU INTO A CIRCULAR, RESOURCE-EFFICIENT, GREEN AND COMPETITIVE LOW- CARBON ECONOMY .............................................................................................................................. 4 Measures towards the circular economy .............................................................................................. 4 Waste management .............................................................................................................................. 8 Climate change .................................................................................................................................... 10 2. PROTECTING, CONSERVING AND ENHANCING NATURAL CAPITAL ................................................... 13 Nature and biodiversity ....................................................................................................................... 13 Maintaining and restoring ecosystems and their services .................................................................. 14 Estimating natural capital .................................................................................................................... 15 Invasive alien species........................................................................................................................... 16 Soil protection ..................................................................................................................................... 17 Marine protection ............................................................................................................................... 18 3. ENSURING CITIZENS’ HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE ........................................................................ 20 Air quality ............................................................................................................................................ 20 Industrial emissions ............................................................................................................................. 21 Noise ................................................................................................................................................. 23 Water quality and management ......................................................................................................... 23 Chemicals ............................................................................................................................................. 27 Making cities more sustainable ........................................................................................................... 28 PART II: ENABLING FRAMEWORK: IMPLEMENTATION TOOLS ................................................................... 32 4. GREEN TAXATION, GREEN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT, ENVIRONMENTAL FUNDING AND INVESTMENTS ..................................................................................................................................... 32 Green taxation and environmentally harmful subsidies ..................................................................... 32 Green public procurement .................................................................................................................. 33 Environmental funding and investments ............................................................................................ 34 5. STRENGTHENING ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE .......................................................................... 37 Information, public participation and access to justice....................................................................... 37 Compliance assurance ......................................................................................................................... 39 Effectiveness of environmental administrations ................................................................................. 40 International agreements .................................................................................................................... 42 Sustainable development and the implementation of the UN SDGs .................................................. 43 2 Environmental Implementation Review 2019 – Italy Executive summary Italy and the Environmental Implementation Review compliant agglomerations under the Urban Waste Water (EIR) Treatment Directive. This has led to the imposition of fines by the CJEU. Investments must continue in land-use In the 2017 EIR Report, the main challenges identified planning (to reduce soil sealing) and in flood control. with regard to implementation in Italy were: On air quality there has been limited progress in reducing improve waste management, in particular by emissions as a whole, and agreements between the reducing landfilling and increasing separate collection national government and regional governments have of waste in the southern regions; been concluded. These agreements have included improve urban waste-water treatment through planning measures (such as limited traffic zones), fiscal appropriate investment; incentives and technical improvements to cars. However, reduce particulate matter and nitrogen dioxide for both particulate matter and NO2 there were emissions by reducing traffic congestion and biomass exceedances reported for 2016 and 2017. The main burning; reason for exceedances is Italy’s high level of road traffic, designate the remaining Natura 2000 sites as special with over 80 % of trips made by private car, as well as areas of conservation and ensure that the Natura inefficient domestic combustion. Progress must also be 2000 network is managed so that it achieves made in reducing subsidies to company cars, achieving favourable conservation status for all species and parity between petrol and diesel fuel prices, and investing habitats. in more sustainable modes of transport. Italy organised four thematic EIR seminars in 2017-2018 On the Natura 2000 network there are still some special on general issues, waste, air and water. There has also areas of conservation waiting to be designated. The been a dialogue held between the Commission and Italy conservation status of habitats and species of EU interest about the EU's action plan on nature. The Commission must also be improved by fully implementing the Natura launched in 2017 the TAIEX-EIR Peer-to-Peer (EIR P2P), as 2000 instruments, using the regional prioritised action a new practical tool facilitating peer-to-peer learning frameworks to better integrate EU funds, and planning between environmental authorities. Italy has profited of investments more strategically. EU support with the EIR peer to peer programme activities on air pollution and forests. The regionalised The 2019 EIR shows that Italy could make more efficient structure of Italy means responsibilities are shared use of EU funds and loan opportunities, by avoiding between the national and regional levels. This means that reallocation from the environment to other sectors and effective coordination is needed within a system of by increasing fund absorption with targeted capacity- multi-level governance. The government’s environmental building activities. programme must be achieved. Examples of good practice Progress in meeting the challenges since 2017 report Italy has created specialised environmental police There has been some progress on waste
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Green Parties and Elections to the European Parliament, 1979–2019 Green Par Elections
    Chapter 1 Green Parties and Elections, 1979–2019 Green parties and elections to the European Parliament, 1979–2019 Wolfgang Rüdig Introduction The history of green parties in Europe is closely intertwined with the history of elections to the European Parliament. When the first direct elections to the European Parliament took place in June 1979, the development of green parties in Europe was still in its infancy. Only in Belgium and the UK had green parties been formed that took part in these elections; but ecological lists, which were the pre- decessors of green parties, competed in other countries. Despite not winning representation, the German Greens were particularly influ- enced by the 1979 European elections. Five years later, most partic- ipating countries had seen the formation of national green parties, and the first Green MEPs from Belgium and Germany were elected. Green parties have been represented continuously in the European Parliament since 1984. Subsequent years saw Greens from many other countries joining their Belgian and German colleagues in the Euro- pean Parliament. European elections continued to be important for party formation in new EU member countries. In the 1980s it was the South European countries (Greece, Portugal and Spain), following 4 GREENS FOR A BETTER EUROPE their successful transition to democracies, that became members. Green parties did not have a strong role in their national party systems, and European elections became an important focus for party develop- ment. In the 1990s it was the turn of Austria, Finland and Sweden to join; green parties were already well established in all three nations and provided ongoing support for Greens in the European Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Moderators & Speakers
    Moderators & Speakers Marcus Asner Marcus is a partner at Arnold & Porter LLP in New York. Marcus served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in New York from 2000 to 2009, where he was Chief of the Major Crimes unit for two years. As a prosecutor, Marcus led the U.S. prosecution of United States v. Bengis, one of the largest poaching cases in history, which involved a massive scheme to import into the U.S. illegally harvested lobster from South Africa. At Arnold & Porter, Marcus routinely counsels clients on a wide variety of environmental and wildlife trafficking issues, and writes and speaks frequently on international wildlife trafficking and corruption. He has given training to INTERPOL and other law enforcement entities on wildlife trafficking, has testified on trafficking issues before the U.S. House of Representatives, and has conducted briefings for the U.S. Congress on wildlife trafficking and related issues. Marcus currently serves on President Obama’s Advisory Council on Wildlife Trafficking, where he co-chairs the Subcommittee on Law Reform. Pablo Ballesteros-Palaez Pablo is currently with DG Research and Innovation. He was formerly with DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion. He also has experience with Transparency International EU where he dealt with EU anti-corruption legislation and EU money laundering, and conducted research on EU Institutions transparency, accountability, independence and integrity. 1 Anne Brosnan Anne is a member of the Presidency of the ENPE and Chief Prosecutor at the UK Environment Agency. She has been a qualified solicitor for twenty-five years. She previously headed the Agency’s Serious Casework Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook Indiveu – Party Preferences
    Codebook InDivEU – party preferences European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies December 2020 Introduction The “InDivEU – party preferences” dataset provides data on the positions of more than 400 parties from 28 countries1 on questions of (differentiated) European integration. The dataset comprises a selection of party positions taken from two existing datasets: (1) The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File contains party positions for three rounds of European Parliament elections (2009, 2014, and 2019). Party positions were determined in an iterative process of party self-placement and expert judgement. For more information: https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/65944 (2) The Chapel Hill Expert Survey The Chapel Hill Expert Survey contains party positions for the national elections most closely corresponding the European Parliament elections of 2009, 2014, 2019. Party positions were determined by expert judgement. For more information: https://www.chesdata.eu/ Three additional party positions, related to DI-specific questions, are included in the dataset. These positions were determined by experts involved in the 2019 edition of euandi after the elections took place. The inclusion of party positions in the “InDivEU – party preferences” is limited to the following issues: - General questions about the EU - Questions about EU policy - Questions about differentiated integration - Questions about party ideology 1 This includes all 27 member states of the European Union in 2020, plus the United Kingdom. How to Cite When using the ‘InDivEU – Party Preferences’ dataset, please cite all of the following three articles: 1. Reiljan, Andres, Frederico Ferreira da Silva, Lorenzo Cicchi, Diego Garzia, Alexander H.
    [Show full text]
  • 8 IUCN Ejournal
    This issue sees a slightly modified format for the e-journal: for this issue only the editors took the decision to bring out a shortened version of the journal. Some colleagues and contributors may be aware that e-Journal editor Gay Morgan sadly lost her partner, Al, to a brain tumour after a difficult fight over the course of putting together this issue. Issue 8 is dedicated to both their bravery. This is also the last issue which will be edited by Michaela Lau - she has moved to a new institution and we wish her every success in her new position. As of this Issue, Dr. Opi Outhwaite has taken on the role of co-editor, after serving as Managing Editor for the past two years. She will be joined by Professor Shawkat Alam as acting co-editor. Despite the shorter than usual issue the editors are pleased to present, in what has become a trademark characteristic of the Journal, an amalgamation of contributions that stretch far and wide within the broad field of environmental law. The Editorial Team hopes that the contributions in this issue may serve as a repository for the exchange of ideas and potential legal and policy responses in an ever-changing and more and more complex world. As is customary, this issue includes several Country and Region Reports. These reports cover both developed and developing countries and present an array of topics of interest and importance in those jurisdictions. Two Country Reports, from China and Kenya, focus on forestry related issues, while several others, including the reports from the Bahamas, Austria and New Zealand canvass recent case law on a variety of topics related to environmental law.
    [Show full text]
  • Greens for a Better Europe for a Better Greens
    GREENS A BETTER FOR EUROPE “If we don’t change we will perish. Only the Greens truly recognise this. Strong Green Party voices at every level of government are vital.” – Sir Mark Rylance – While Greens in the UK have always suffered from a grossly unfair electoral system, in the European Union they have been able to flourish as part of a small but effective group of European Greens since their first election in 1999. GREENS Greens have had a significant influence on the policies impacting more than 500 million EU citizens, underlining environmental standards and challenging economic and social orthodoxy. While Greens have often been marginalised by the political and media FOR elites in Britain, across Europe, Greens have been seen as ‘the voice of reason’ and the ‘adults in the room’. A With Brexit threatening our ongoing influence on European policy-making, former and current UK Green MEPs Caroline Lucas, Jean Lambert, Keith Taylor and Molly Scott Cato reflect on their time in Brussels and chart a course for the party’s new relationship with the EU-wide Green movement. BETTER This guide to two decades of UK Green achievements in Europe also brings together analysis from prominent academics, journalists, campaigners and Green MEPs from across the EU. EUROPE TWENTY YEARS OF UK GREEN INFLUENCE IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, 1999–2019 EDITED BY LIAM WARD WITH JAMES BRADY GREENS FOR A BETTER EUROPE GREENS FOR A BETTER EUROPE TWENTY YEARS OF UK GREEN INFLUENCE IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, 1999–2019 EDITED BY LIAM WARD WITH JAMES BRADY LONDON PUBLISHING
    [Show full text]
  • EU Profiler-Euandi Trendfile Codebook
    - Codebook - EU Profiler/euandi Trend File (2009-2019) European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies February 2020 Introduction The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File (2009-2019) combines party position data from three pan-European voting advice applications (VAAs), developed for the European Parliament elections in 2009, 2014 and 2019. It includes the positions of over 400 parties1 from the 28 EU member states on a wide range of salient political issues. The project was first launched in 2009 under the name ‘EU Profiler’ by the European University Institute (EUI), in collaboration with Smartvote (Switzerland) and Kieskompas (2009). By positioning more than 270 political parties from 30 European countries2 it was the first cross-national VAA of such magnitude. EU Profiler was succeeded by ‘euandi’ (EU and I) in 2014 and re-launched as ‘euandi2019’ five years later, in collaboration with the University of Luzern.3 To determine party positions on the political issues, all three editions of the VAA have used the same iterative method that combines party self-placement and expert judgement. All the parties were offered a chance to place themselves on the pre-selected issue-statements. The parties were also placed on the same list of issues by a group of experts from each EU member state. The results were then compared and, if necessary, calibrated in co-operation with the party representatives. If the party did not respond to the invitation to participate in the self-placement procedure, the positions were determined solely by the expert group.4 Over 100 highly trained experts across Europe worked for each of these VAAs to make such immense data collection endeavour possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Better Europe for a Better Greens
    GREENS A BETTER FOR EUROPE – Sir Mark Rylance – While Greens in the UK have always suffered from a grossly unfair electoral system, in the European Union they have been able to flourish as part of a small but GREENS effective group of European Greens since their first election in 1999. Greens have had a significant influence on the policies impacting more than 500 million EU citizens, underlining environmental standards and challenging FOR economic and social orthodoxy. While Greens have often been marginalised by the political and media elites in Britain, across Europe, Greens have been seen as ‘the voice of reason’ and the ‘adults in the room’. A With Brexit threatening our ongoing influence on European policy-making, former and current UK Green MEPs Caroline Lucas, Jean Lambert, Keith Taylor and Molly Scott Cato reflect on their time in Brussels and chart a course for the party’s new relationship with the BETTER EU-wide Green movement. This guide to two decades of UK Green achievements in Europe also brings together analysis from prominent academics, journalists, campaigners and Green MEPs from across the EU. EUROPE TWENTY YEARS OF UK GREEN INFLUENCE IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, 1999–2019 EDITED BY LIAM WARD WITH JAMES BRADY GREENS FOR A BETTER EUROPE GREENS FOR A BETTER EUROPE TWENTY YEARS OF UK GREEN INFLUENCE IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, 1999–2019 EDITED BY LIAM WARD WITH JAMES BRADY LONDON PUBLISHING PARTNERSHIP Copyright © 2019 Office of the Green MEPs, Natalie Bennett, James Brady, Reinhard Bütikofer, Samir Jeraj, Klina Jordan,
    [Show full text]
  • Better Europe for a Better Greens
    GREENS A BETTER FOR EUROPE – Sir Mark Rylance – While Greens in the UK have always suffered from a grossly unfair electoral system, in the European Union they have been able to flourish as part of a small but GREENS effective group of European Greens since their first election in 1999. Greens have had a significant influence on the policies impacting more than 500 million EU citizens, underlining environmental standards and challenging FOR economic and social orthodoxy. While Greens have often been marginalised by the political and media elites in Britain, across Europe, Greens have been seen as ‘the voice of reason’ and the ‘adults in the room’. A With Brexit threatening our ongoing influence on European policy-making, former and current UK Green MEPs Caroline Lucas, Jean Lambert, Keith Taylor and Molly Scott Cato reflect on their time in Brussels and chart a course for the party’s new relationship with the BETTER EU-wide Green movement. This guide to two decades of UK Green achievements in Europe also brings together analysis from prominent academics, journalists, campaigners and Green MEPs from across the EU. EUROPE TWENTY YEARS OF UK GREEN INFLUENCE IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, 1999–2019 EDITED BY LIAM WARD WITH JAMES BRADY GREENS FOR A BETTER EUROPE GREENS FOR A BETTER EUROPE TWENTY YEARS OF UK GREEN INFLUENCE IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, 1999–2019 EDITED BY LIAM WARD WITH JAMES BRADY LONDON PUBLISHING PARTNERSHIP Copyright © 2019 Office of the Green MEPs, Natalie Bennett, James Brady, Reinhard Bütikofer, Samir Jeraj, Klina Jordan,
    [Show full text]
  • Quali Prospettive? Le Misure Di Stimolo Alla Green Economy Per Restituire Competitività All’Economia Italiana Nel Quadro Europeo
    Conferenza internazionale “GREEN ACT”: quali prospettive? Le misure di stimolo alla Green Economy per restituire competitività all’economia italiana nel quadro europeo Università Bocconi Aula Magna, via Gobbi 5, Milano 18 maggio 2015 Speakers’ biographies Alberto Grando Alberto Grando is Vice Rector for Development at Bocconi University, where he is Professor of Operations Management at the Department of Management and Technology. He is also Professor at the Technology and Production Unit of SDA Bocconi School of Management. His areas of expertise include Operations Strategy, Supply Chain Management, Operations Performance Measurement. Visiting Professor at Cranfield School of Management (UK), he has published a number of books and articles in academic and professional journals. He is also Board Member of many Scientific and Academic Advisory Boards of national and international Institutions and research centres; among the others, EFMD – European Foundation for Management Development, EABIS – European Association for Business in Society, BCFN – Barilla Center for Food and Nutrition. Michele Polo Michele Polo is full professor in Economics, eni Chair in Energy Markets and Director of the Centre for Energy and Environmental Economics and Policy (Iefe) at Bocconi University. He has studied at Bocconi University and the London School of Economics. His research interests are in Industrial Organization, Regulation and Antitrust, Liberalization of Network Industries and Energy Economics. He has published several books and articles in important international Journals. He has been advisor of the Chief Economist at the DG Competition in Bruxelles. Fabrizio Spada Fabrizio Spada is Head of the European Commission’s Regional Representation in Milan. Mr. Fabrizio Spada takes office as Head of Regional Representation in Milan from 1st April 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Views from Italy: out of the Crisis. with Another Europe the Monti
    adopt certain policies. The explicit intention was for Italy The Future of the European Union to regain its lost international credibility and to play once again a leading role among the founding members of Views from Italy: Out of the crisis. European project. Hopes were high among With another Europe environmentalists as well: Monti had signed two reports addressed to the European Commission in which the green economy and tackling climate change played a central role1. These hopes were gone as soon as Monti's government cut welfare, social services and pensions, increased taxes for those Italians already paying them, de facto ignoring Italy's huge tax evasion, black market economy and the increasing gap between the richest and the poorest citizens, with 10% of the rich owning 46% of Italy's total assets (according to the Italian Central Bank). Environmental priorities and sustainable growth were not even mentioned. Monti showed little creativity at the EU level as well, his government having pursued the decisions taken at last European Council (June 28th – 29th). Sergio Andreis of Sbilanciamoci! discusses in the Five parties are currently represented in the Italian article below the conclusions of the conference “Out Parliament, of which three have been supporting the of the crisis with another Europe”, organised on July Monti government: Berlusconi's Popolo delle libertà – 9th 2012 by GEF with support of Sbilanciamoci! . The Freedoms' People (member of the European People’s article represents an attempt to define Italian PartyEuropean group); Unione di Centro, Center Union perspectives on the EU debt crisis and to put forward (also member of the EPP) and Partito Democratico, the proposals suggested by the Italian civil society to Democratic Party (member of the Socialist & Democrat overcome the crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 PROFILE the Greens in the 2014 European Elections Wolfgang
    PROFILE The Greens in the 2014 European Elections Wolfgang Rüdig, Department of Government, University of Strathclyde, UK Email: [email protected] Green parties entered the European election campaign of 2014 facing some major challenges. Austerity politics and the Euro crisis ensured that social and economic issues dominated the agenda and, with environmental topics marginalised, populist right wing and Eurosceptic parties were expected to make big gains in many countries. The Greens had been boosted in 2009 by record results for French and German Greens, but neither was expected to do as well. Given the broadly unfavourable conditions, green parties performed reasonably well (see Table 1). The European Green Party (EGP) won 38 seats in the European Parliament, compared with 46 in 2009. The Green Party-European Free Alliance (EFA) parliamentary group registered 50 Members of the European Parliament (MEPs), including seven from various regional parties and five independents) in 2014, compared with 55 in 2009.1 Insert table 1 about here The Campaign The European Greens enthusiastically embraced the idea of Spitzenkandidaten (lead candidates) for the campaign and organised an online open ‘green primary’ in which not just green party members but all EU citizens could take part. A total of 22,676 people expressed a preference, electing Ska Keller from Germany and José Bové from France as the Greens’ ‘lead’ candidates. The press response to this was rather muted, however. The level of participation was considered a bit of a fiasco, at least by the German press, which calculated that about 0.005% of the targeted EU population had bothered to participate in the primary (Gathmann 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • The Greens in the 2019 European Elections
    The Greens in the 2019 European Elections Mitya Pearsona and Wolfgang Rüdigb a Department of Political Economy, King’s College London, UK b School of Government and Public Policy, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK Corresponding author: [email protected] Green parties were particularly successful in the May 2019 elections to the European Parliament (EP). 55 Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) representing the European Green Party (EGP) were elected, a major advance on the 37 elected in 2014 and surpassing the previous high of 47 in 2009. This success helped to boost The Greens / European Free Alliance (EFA) parliamentary group to 751, from 50 in 2014. With the main centre-left and centre-right groups together failing to command a majority in the Parliament for the first time, the Greens have reason to expect that their influence will increase substantially. Many Green parties will also hope that success in the European elections will have a positive effect on their standing at national level. The Election Campaign The 2014 EP elections had been dominated by austerity and economic crisis; environmental issues were sidelined and the Greens struggled. Following the 2015 refugee crisis and several successful electoral performances, populist and extreme right-wing parties appeared as the major challengers to the mainstream parties, and it was feared that the 2019 EP elections would see a further rise of populist right parties. Developments in the run up to the elections, however, indicated that conditions might be more encouraging for Greens. Results in local, regional and national elections in Belgium, Germany and Luxembourg in October 2018 saw big increases in support for Green parties, giving rise to the notion of a ‘green wave’.
    [Show full text]