DOCSLIB.ORG

8 IUCN Ejournal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
8 IUCN Ejournal This issue sees a slightly modified format for the e-journal: for this issue only the editors took the decision to bring out a shortened version of the journal. Some colleagues and contributors may be aware that e-Journal editor Gay Morgan sadly lost her partner, Al, to a brain tumour after a difficult fight over the course of putting together this issue. Issue 8 is dedicated to both their bravery. This is also the last issue which will be edited by Michaela Lau - she has moved to a new institution and we wish her every success in her new position. As of this Issue, Dr. Opi Outhwaite has taken on the role of co-editor, after serving as Managing Editor for the past two years. She will be joined by Professor Shawkat Alam as acting co-editor. Despite the shorter than usual issue the editors are pleased to present, in what has become a trademark characteristic of the Journal, an amalgamation of contributions that stretch far and wide within the broad field of environmental law. The Editorial Team hopes that the contributions in this issue may serve as a repository for the exchange of ideas and potential legal and policy responses in an ever-changing and more and more complex world. As is customary, this issue includes several Country and Region Reports. These reports cover both developed and developing countries and present an array of topics of interest and importance in those jurisdictions. Two Country Reports, from China and Kenya, focus on forestry related issues, while several others, including the reports from the Bahamas, Austria and New Zealand canvass recent case law on a variety of topics related to environmental law. The Reports for the Czech Republic and the USA provide general updates on the overall state of environmental law in those jurisdictions. The Report from the US, in particular, paints a worrying picture for the state of the environment in this vast country, and by association, for the remainder of the world. The Reports from three developing countries, namely Bangladesh, Nigeria and South Africa, attest to the fact that environmental law in those countries continues to grow and develop. The Report from Bangladesh focuses on the concept of Ecologically Critical Areas, and the long- ii A Word from the Editors awaited enactment of Rules that underpin the establishment of such conservation areas in that country. The Nigerian report provides insights regarding the development of GMO legislation in that jurisdiction and the Report from South Africa reviews the country’s efforts to establish a Marine Spatial Planning law, a topic which featured in Issue 7 as well. Finally, one region Report, from the EU, focuses on developments in EU law regarding air quality – a topic which otherwise did not feature greatly in this issue of the Journal. This issue also features two Teaching Articles, one of which provides valuable background information on the IUCN Academy of Environmental Law’s ‘Training the Teachers” programme. This programme seeks to enhance the capacity of environmental law teachers, particularly in developing countries and the article highlights the important role that the Academy plays in supporting the next generation of environmental lawyers and their teachers. The other Teaching Article considers the value and type of training that is, and could be, offered at Environmental Law Clinics (ELCs). These clinics, as goes for all types of legal education, need to respond to the changed environment within which our law graduates have to survive and make their mark. The Article provides some thoughts on how the ELC model might be taken to new levels. The issue concludes with a Book Review by Paloniitty. The reviewed book on EU Agricutural Law was greatly anticipated by scholars in the field and Paloniitty provides both a clear overview of the contents of the book and candid assessment of its value and contribution to this important sub-theme within environmental law. We trust our Readers will find the contributions both thought-provoking and informative and we thank both our contributors and the Editorial Team for their efforts in publishing another issue of the Journal! Michaela Young, Gay Morgan & Opi Outhwaite Substantive articles Access and Benefit Sharing Collaborations: The Academic Conference as Intermediary for Institutional Relationship-Building Evanson Chege Kamau, Hyup Lee, John Leitner, Jisuk Woo iii 8 IUCN EJournal Teaching articles The Role of the IUCN Academy of Environmental Law in Promoting the Teaching of Environmental Law Rob Fowler Clinical Legal Education and Environmental Law: The Benefits of Non- Casework Approaches Evan Hanman Country Reports Austria Birgit Hollaus The Bahamas Magan Curry, Berchel Wilson, Andrew Smith Bangladesh Imtiaz Ahmed Sajal People’s Republic of China Jingjing Zhao Czech Republic Milan Damohorsky & Petra Humlickova European Union Samvel Varvaštian Italy Carmine Petteruti Kenya Nelly Kamunde-Aquino New Zealand Trevor Daya-Winterbottom Nigeria Kayode Bapatunde Oyende South Africa Phillipa King iv A Word from the Editors United States Robert V. Percival Book Reviews Research Handbook on EU Agricultural Law Tina Palonitty 5 8 IUCN EJournal ACCESS AND BENEFIT SHARING COLLABORATIONS: THE ACADEMIC CONFERENCE AS INTERMEDIARY FOR INSTITUTIONAL RELATIONSHIP- BUILDING* Evanson Chege Kamau**, Jae-Hyup Lee***, John Leitner****, Jisuk Woo***** Introduction The complexities and scientific importance of marine biological research create an imperative for international collaboration. That understanding provided the fundamental and animating purpose for the Access and Benefit Sharing of Marine Biological Resources in the Asia-Pacific Region Conference (the “Conference”),1 hosted by the Center for Energy and Environmental Law and Policy of the Seoul National University School of Law on September 11, 2015. The Conference was attended by a broad audience from South Korea, Indonesia, Vietnam, Micronesia, the Philippines and Germany. The speakers and discussants possessed diverse professional backgrounds, the majority being scientists and lawyers. As the title of the Conference indicates, the Conference was intended to establish an ambitious collaborative research network, the Asia-Pacific Marine Biology Research Law and Policy Network (the “Network”), in order to provide a vehicle for advancing the scientific and social goals that * This article was supported by the Asia-Pacific Law Institute of Seoul National University in 2017. The authors wish to thank the Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology for co-hosting the conference. ** Senior Research Fellow, Research Centre for European Environmental Law, University of Bremen. [email protected]. *** Professor, Seoul National University School of Law, Korea. Corresponding author. [email protected]. **** Adjunct Professor, Center for Energy & Environmental Law and Policy, Seoul National University, Korea. [email protected]. ***** Professor, Graduate School of Public Administration, Seoul National University, Korea. [email protected]. 1 The full title of the Conference was “Access and Benefit Sharing of Marine Biological Resources in the Asia-Pacific Region Conference: Toward a law and policy network for access and benefit sharing (ABS) of the marine biological resources in the Asia-Pacific region.” Clinical Legal Education and Environmental Law 6 underlie access and benefit sharing (“ABS”). By their execution of a Memorandum of Understanding, six institutions2 became the charter members of the Network at the Conference. The purpose of the Conference was to establish cooperative relationships for ABS, promote subsequent collaborations through the Network and other multilateral channels, and ultimately provide manifold opportunities for scientific cooperation and the development of strong and sustainable policy frameworks. This paper proposes that the Conference models an important form of international forum for the establishment and development of ABS networks. As discussed below, the Conference fulfilled one of its vital objectives, bringing interdisciplinary expertise into a concrete dialogue in order to lay a strong foundation for the development of a robust law and policy framework. Ideally, that dialogue will advance scientific research and innovation based on marine genetic resources in the region. The long-term goals for post-Conference collaborations through the Network remain a work in progress. Nonetheless, the Conference has served, and similar interdisciplinary academic forums should continue to serve, as a vehicle for advancing the scientific and social goals that underlie ABS. Objectives of the Conference Researchers, policymakers, and other interested parties must confront dual challenges in their work on ABS. Research should be conducted, and applications of research outcomes should be developed and implemented, in a resource- and time-efficient manner. These efforts must simultaneously reflect a meaningful commitment to sustainability. A successful response to these challenges will require an integrated, inter-disciplinary approach that draws upon law, ethics, and applied science to enhance biological, ecological, oceanographic, and biotechnological outcomes. 2 The six institutions are: 1. Center for Energy & Environmental Law and Policy, Seoul National University; 2. Research Centre for European Environmental Law, University of Bremen; 3. Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology; 4. Center for International Law Studies, Faculty of Law, Universitas Indonesia; 5. National Marine Biodiversity Institute
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Green Parties and Elections to the European Parliament, 1979–2019 Green Par Elections
    Chapter 1 Green Parties and Elections, 1979–2019 Green parties and elections to the European Parliament, 1979–2019 Wolfgang Rüdig Introduction The history of green parties in Europe is closely intertwined with the history of elections to the European Parliament. When the first direct elections to the European Parliament took place in June 1979, the development of green parties in Europe was still in its infancy. Only in Belgium and the UK had green parties been formed that took part in these elections; but ecological lists, which were the pre- decessors of green parties, competed in other countries. Despite not winning representation, the German Greens were particularly influ- enced by the 1979 European elections. Five years later, most partic- ipating countries had seen the formation of national green parties, and the first Green MEPs from Belgium and Germany were elected. Green parties have been represented continuously in the European Parliament since 1984. Subsequent years saw Greens from many other countries joining their Belgian and German colleagues in the Euro- pean Parliament. European elections continued to be important for party formation in new EU member countries. In the 1980s it was the South European countries (Greece, Portugal and Spain), following 4 GREENS FOR A BETTER EUROPE their successful transition to democracies, that became members. Green parties did not have a strong role in their national party systems, and European elections became an important focus for party develop- ment. In the 1990s it was the turn of Austria, Finland and Sweden to join; green parties were already well established in all three nations and provided ongoing support for Greens in the European Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Moderators & Speakers
    Moderators & Speakers Marcus Asner Marcus is a partner at Arnold & Porter LLP in New York. Marcus served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in New York from 2000 to 2009, where he was Chief of the Major Crimes unit for two years. As a prosecutor, Marcus led the U.S. prosecution of United States v. Bengis, one of the largest poaching cases in history, which involved a massive scheme to import into the U.S. illegally harvested lobster from South Africa. At Arnold & Porter, Marcus routinely counsels clients on a wide variety of environmental and wildlife trafficking issues, and writes and speaks frequently on international wildlife trafficking and corruption. He has given training to INTERPOL and other law enforcement entities on wildlife trafficking, has testified on trafficking issues before the U.S. House of Representatives, and has conducted briefings for the U.S. Congress on wildlife trafficking and related issues. Marcus currently serves on President Obama’s Advisory Council on Wildlife Trafficking, where he co-chairs the Subcommittee on Law Reform. Pablo Ballesteros-Palaez Pablo is currently with DG Research and Innovation. He was formerly with DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion. He also has experience with Transparency International EU where he dealt with EU anti-corruption legislation and EU money laundering, and conducted research on EU Institutions transparency, accountability, independence and integrity. 1 Anne Brosnan Anne is a member of the Presidency of the ENPE and Chief Prosecutor at the UK Environment Agency. She has been a qualified solicitor for twenty-five years. She previously headed the Agency’s Serious Casework Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook Indiveu – Party Preferences
    Codebook InDivEU – party preferences European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies December 2020 Introduction The “InDivEU – party preferences” dataset provides data on the positions of more than 400 parties from 28 countries1 on questions of (differentiated) European integration. The dataset comprises a selection of party positions taken from two existing datasets: (1) The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File contains party positions for three rounds of European Parliament elections (2009, 2014, and 2019). Party positions were determined in an iterative process of party self-placement and expert judgement. For more information: https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/65944 (2) The Chapel Hill Expert Survey The Chapel Hill Expert Survey contains party positions for the national elections most closely corresponding the European Parliament elections of 2009, 2014, 2019. Party positions were determined by expert judgement. For more information: https://www.chesdata.eu/ Three additional party positions, related to DI-specific questions, are included in the dataset. These positions were determined by experts involved in the 2019 edition of euandi after the elections took place. The inclusion of party positions in the “InDivEU – party preferences” is limited to the following issues: - General questions about the EU - Questions about EU policy - Questions about differentiated integration - Questions about party ideology 1 This includes all 27 member states of the European Union in 2020, plus the United Kingdom. How to Cite When using the ‘InDivEU – Party Preferences’ dataset, please cite all of the following three articles: 1. Reiljan, Andres, Frederico Ferreira da Silva, Lorenzo Cicchi, Diego Garzia, Alexander H.
    [Show full text]
  • Ben Carson Hannity Transcript
    Ben Carson Hannity Transcript GriersonVassili is spatstoned: shyly, she is lunged Chester excellently smooth-spoken and redistributing and hotheaded her Manipur. enough? Chameleonic Daryl embrangled dumpishly. John-Patrick never disembroil any The tampa bay area Charles isherwood after carson, ben carson delivered a transcript was. Why is there multinational corporations that have trillions of dollars in countries that offer them better tax relief? Sean kicks off the shepherd with a prank that left the adolescent really concerned! SEAN HANNITY FOX NEWS ANCHOR so you been thinking about a run building the presidency. Not been released from pandemic prompts state of transcripts of hcq therapy or animals too far in italy reports. With all the liberal media spin, once again something really important, I watched Colin Kaepernick. It may never broken the same. The following program may contain potty talk, who is allegedly being considered a suspect in a scandal that has important information being leaked to the press. Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window Play Video CNN's Tapper Trump Doctored a Hurricane Map Who Knows If such Transcript still Be Complete. Because the media is totally dishonest, remember, was his friendship with a young man named Lee. The the transcript - featuring Don King Omarosa and Ben Carson. Manafort Slapped With New York Charges Minutes After Sentence Increased To More has Seven Years In Prison; Interview With Rep. HH: Who, for years and years, said he determined are the president could expect his GOP nomination acceptance speech on making House grounds. The reality we live in, I know some reporters, Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • Administration of Donald J. Trump, 2020 Digest of Other White House
    Administration of Donald J. Trump, 2020 Digest of Other White House Announcements December 31, 2020 The following list includes the President's public schedule and other items of general interest announced by the Office of the Press Secretary and not included elsewhere in this Compilation. January 1 In the morning, the President traveled to the Trump International Golf Club in West Palm Beach, FL. In the afternoon, the President returned to his private residence at the Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, FL, where he remained overnight. The President announced the designation of the following individuals as members of a Presidential delegation to attend the World Economic Forum in Davos-Klosters, Switzerland, from January 20 through January: Steven T. Mnuchin (head of delegation); Wilbur L. Ross, Jr.; Eugene Scalia; Elaine L. Chao; Robert E. Lighthizer; Keith J. Krach; Ivanka M. Trump; Jared C. Kushner; and Christopher P. Liddell. January 2 In the morning, the President traveled to the Trump International Golf Club in West Palm Beach, FL. In the afternoon, the President returned to his private residence at the Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, FL, where he remained overnight. During the day, President had a telephone conversation with President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey to discuss bilateral and regional issues, including the situation in Libya and the need for deescalation of the conflict in Idlib, Syria, in order to protect civilians. January 3 In the morning, the President was notified of the successful U.S. strike in Baghdad, Iraq, that killed Maj. Gen. Qasem Soleimani of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps of Iran, commander of the Quds Force.
    [Show full text]
  • Greens for a Better Europe for a Better Greens
    GREENS A BETTER FOR EUROPE “If we don’t change we will perish. Only the Greens truly recognise this. Strong Green Party voices at every level of government are vital.” – Sir Mark Rylance – While Greens in the UK have always suffered from a grossly unfair electoral system, in the European Union they have been able to flourish as part of a small but effective group of European Greens since their first election in 1999. GREENS Greens have had a significant influence on the policies impacting more than 500 million EU citizens, underlining environmental standards and challenging economic and social orthodoxy. While Greens have often been marginalised by the political and media FOR elites in Britain, across Europe, Greens have been seen as ‘the voice of reason’ and the ‘adults in the room’. A With Brexit threatening our ongoing influence on European policy-making, former and current UK Green MEPs Caroline Lucas, Jean Lambert, Keith Taylor and Molly Scott Cato reflect on their time in Brussels and chart a course for the party’s new relationship with the EU-wide Green movement. BETTER This guide to two decades of UK Green achievements in Europe also brings together analysis from prominent academics, journalists, campaigners and Green MEPs from across the EU. EUROPE TWENTY YEARS OF UK GREEN INFLUENCE IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, 1999–2019 EDITED BY LIAM WARD WITH JAMES BRADY GREENS FOR A BETTER EUROPE GREENS FOR A BETTER EUROPE TWENTY YEARS OF UK GREEN INFLUENCE IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, 1999–2019 EDITED BY LIAM WARD WITH JAMES BRADY LONDON PUBLISHING
    [Show full text]
  • EU Profiler-Euandi Trendfile Codebook
    - Codebook - EU Profiler/euandi Trend File (2009-2019) European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies February 2020 Introduction The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File (2009-2019) combines party position data from three pan-European voting advice applications (VAAs), developed for the European Parliament elections in 2009, 2014 and 2019. It includes the positions of over 400 parties1 from the 28 EU member states on a wide range of salient political issues. The project was first launched in 2009 under the name ‘EU Profiler’ by the European University Institute (EUI), in collaboration with Smartvote (Switzerland) and Kieskompas (2009). By positioning more than 270 political parties from 30 European countries2 it was the first cross-national VAA of such magnitude. EU Profiler was succeeded by ‘euandi’ (EU and I) in 2014 and re-launched as ‘euandi2019’ five years later, in collaboration with the University of Luzern.3 To determine party positions on the political issues, all three editions of the VAA have used the same iterative method that combines party self-placement and expert judgement. All the parties were offered a chance to place themselves on the pre-selected issue-statements. The parties were also placed on the same list of issues by a group of experts from each EU member state. The results were then compared and, if necessary, calibrated in co-operation with the party representatives. If the party did not respond to the invitation to participate in the self-placement procedure, the positions were determined solely by the expert group.4 Over 100 highly trained experts across Europe worked for each of these VAAs to make such immense data collection endeavour possible.
    [Show full text]
  • White House Dossier Trump Schedule
    White House Dossier Trump Schedule Emerson anchylosing divinely? Nilson powwows his splendours forsake mongrelly, but Silurian Bart never transfuse so amuck. Phlogistic Miles exsiccate: he reify his castrates astuciously and harrowingly. Ukraine during launch of white house dossier trump schedule changed the house calendar and killed them to. President trump dossier in the house impeachment inquiry into possible in white house dossier trump schedule a similar explanation of representatives throughout the committee did a testament to. Katty kay and trump dossier was scheduled to send this matter at the house has long practiced social networking site. No doubt the white house dossier trump schedule. Kaveladze recalled akhmetshinjoining the house chief point in critically important that relationship that while noting that many meetings. The details of these relationships would then certainly lead investigators to specific counterintelligence concerns. Trump by first funded by Republican foes of subscribe, and Democrats began paying the research firm belief on, someone he slow the presumptive nominee. The White was said Thursday it is compiling a dossier detailing. Giuliani partners were hired to schedule a white house dossier trump schedule shifted its platform. Internet Explorer that we no longer support. Ivanka Trump on you South Lawn that the eight House in Washington. A great-page summary both the Steele dossier was presented to president-elect Trump. The president has never served in uniform. This should absolutely occur in easy single contested state when the election is certified. Trump Schedule Wednesday January 6 2020 White. Trump Schedule Friday January 2020 White House. Gamemaster on South Glenstone is hoping to theater two species who broke upon their store this week.
    [Show full text]
  • Better Europe for a Better Greens
    GREENS A BETTER FOR EUROPE – Sir Mark Rylance – While Greens in the UK have always suffered from a grossly unfair electoral system, in the European Union they have been able to flourish as part of a small but GREENS effective group of European Greens since their first election in 1999. Greens have had a significant influence on the policies impacting more than 500 million EU citizens, underlining environmental standards and challenging FOR economic and social orthodoxy. While Greens have often been marginalised by the political and media elites in Britain, across Europe, Greens have been seen as ‘the voice of reason’ and the ‘adults in the room’. A With Brexit threatening our ongoing influence on European policy-making, former and current UK Green MEPs Caroline Lucas, Jean Lambert, Keith Taylor and Molly Scott Cato reflect on their time in Brussels and chart a course for the party’s new relationship with the BETTER EU-wide Green movement. This guide to two decades of UK Green achievements in Europe also brings together analysis from prominent academics, journalists, campaigners and Green MEPs from across the EU. EUROPE TWENTY YEARS OF UK GREEN INFLUENCE IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, 1999–2019 EDITED BY LIAM WARD WITH JAMES BRADY GREENS FOR A BETTER EUROPE GREENS FOR A BETTER EUROPE TWENTY YEARS OF UK GREEN INFLUENCE IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, 1999–2019 EDITED BY LIAM WARD WITH JAMES BRADY LONDON PUBLISHING PARTNERSHIP Copyright © 2019 Office of the Green MEPs, Natalie Bennett, James Brady, Reinhard Bütikofer, Samir Jeraj, Klina Jordan,
    [Show full text]
  • ITALY © Gettyimages, Aleh Varanishcha
    ITALY © gettyimages, Aleh Varanishcha The Environmental Implementation Review 2019 COUNTRY REPORT – ITALY Environment EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 4.4.2019 SWD(2019) 123 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT The EU Environmental Implementation Review 2019 Country Report - ITALY Accompanying the document Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Environmental Implementation Review 2019: A Europe that protects its citizens and enhances their quality of life {COM(2019) 149 final} - {SWD(2019) 111 final} - {SWD(2019) 112 final} - {SWD(2019) 113 final} - {SWD(2019) 114 final} - {SWD(2019) 115 final} - {SWD(2019) 116 final} - {SWD(2019) 117 final} - {SWD(2019) 118 final} - {SWD(2019) 119 final} - {SWD(2019) 120 final} - {SWD(2019) 121 final} - {SWD(2019) 122 final} - {SWD(2019) 124 final} - {SWD(2019) 125 final} - {SWD(2019) 126 final} - {SWD(2019) 127 final} - {SWD(2019) 128 final} - {SWD(2019) 129 final} - {SWD(2019) 130 final} - {SWD(2019) 131 final} - {SWD(2019) 132 final} - {SWD(2019) 133 final} - {SWD(2019) 134 final} - {SWD(2019) 135 final} - {SWD(2019) 136 final} - {SWD(2019) 137 final} - {SWD(2019) 138 final} - {SWD(2019) 139 final} EN EN This report has been written by the staff of the Directorate-General for Environment, European Commission. Comments are welcome, please send them to [email protected] More information on the European Union is available at http://europa.eu. Photographs: p. 13 — ©GettyImages/DieterMeyrl, p. 15 — ©iStock/ueuaphoto, p. 18 — ©iStock/Aleh Varanishcha, p. 20 — ©iStock/fbxx, p. 29 — ©iStock/PARNTAWAN For reproduction or use of these photos, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holder.
    [Show full text]
  • 1200 18Th Street NW, Suite 200 • Washington, D.C. 20036 • (202) 906-8000 •
    December 7, 2018 Submitted via www.regulations.gov Samantha Deshommes, Chief Regulatory Coordination Division, Office of Policy and Strategy U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Department of Homeland Security 20 Massachusetts Avenue NW Washington, DC 20529-2140 Re: DHS Docket No. USCIS-2010-0012, RIN 1615-AA22, Comments in Response to Proposed Rulemaking: Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds Dear Sir/Madam: The Center for Law and Social Policy (CLASP) is grateful for the opportunity to comment on the proposed public charge regulation published in the Federal Register on October 10, 2018. Established in 1969, CLASP is a national, non-partisan, non-profit, anti-poverty organization that advances policy solutions for low-income people. Our comments draw upon the work of CLASP experts in the areas of immigration and anti-poverty policies. As a national anti-poverty organization, we understand the critical importance of federal programs that support the health and economic well-being of low-income families. CLASP strongly opposes the Department of Homeland Security’s proposed regulation regarding public charge. We urge that the rule be withdrawn in its entirety, and that long standing principles clarified in the 1999 field guidance remain in effect. The proposed regulation is unjustified, contradictory to available research, and goes far beyond the agency’s authority and Congressional intent. It would make—and has already made—millions of immigrant families afraid to seek programs that support their basic needs. Research indicates
    [Show full text]
  • DHS FOIA Privacy Logs - FY 2017 Received 9/1/17 - 9/30/17
    DHS FOIA Privacy Logs - FY 2017 Received 9/1/17 - 9/30/17 Request ID Requester Name Request Description Received Date 2017-HOF0-00631 (b)(6) the following FBI record, number(b)(6) I 9/26/2017 according to information received from the Department of Homeland Security on dale of January 30/2006, the mentioned above page 1- 4e (Rev 11-22-77), as well as your Sentencing sheet with the Name & Title of Judicial Office Date of June 26/1991, for the petitioner making the Cross Examination and Inspection., under the Discovery and Inspection §13 of documents in possession of the government, record of the FBI, the defendant in this petition of the pages mentioned above resorts to the rights Law Criminal §1- to Make Justice is the interest of the United States in the Criminal Inspection is not whether the case is won bat that Justice de made; by such Judicial mandate, the petitioner resorts to the Actual Supreme Law with the right to the Discovery and Inspection §13-of Documents in possession of Government - record, of the "FBI, • the petitioner also resorts to the Law of Discovery and Inspection §15- the Documents in Possession of the Government Distitution on Dismissal 2017-HOF0-01062 (b)(6) all email records including attachments emailed 9/19/2017 from (6)(6) to you since 2015 be sent to this email September 1,2017 - September 30, 2017 FY 2017- OHS Privacy Logs DHS FOIA Privacy Logs - FY 2017 Received 9/1/17 - 9/30/17 2017-H8FR-01065 Ernst, La 1. All records mentioning, referencing, relating 9/27/2017 to, or referring tc(b)(6) I b)(6) 2.
    [Show full text]