Modern Annual Deposition and Aerial Pollen Transport in the Lena Delta

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Modern Annual Deposition and Aerial Pollen Transport in the Lena Delta Polarforschung 70: JJ5 - J22, 2000 (erschienen 2002) Modern Annual Deposition and Aerial Pollen Transport in the Lena Delta by Larissa A. Savelieva', Marina V. Dorozhkina' and Elena Yu. Pavlova' Summary: Studies of the annual pollen and spore deposition in different Iong-distance pollen transported by air masses, atmospheric areas of the Lena Delta were undertaken for the first time in the Asian sector precipitation and factors influencing pollen preservation of the Arctic during the Russian-German "LENA 98" and "LENA 99" expedi­ tions in the framework of the International "Laptev Sea System-2000" Project. (HICKS 1999). The study of recent spore-pellen spectra allows To achieve this objective, three spore-pellen traps were set up along the meri­ us to determine the factors influencing their composition dional delta profile in accordance with the European Pollen Monitoring Pro­ under arctic tundra conditions, which will make it possible in gramme for the period July 1998 to August 1999. A comparison betwcen the the future to more correctly interpret fossil palynospectra from results of spore-pellen analysis of the contents of traps and the surrounding vegetation was performed. The results confirmed the current spore-pollen Holocene age deposits. spectra are comprised both of pollen and spores of the local plants and of long-distance pollen and spores. The dependence of the long-distance pollen Specific studies of the problem of pollen presence in the air of deposition on the character of the wind regime of the region was established. high latitudes began in the 1930s (KIL'DYUSHEVSKY 1955). In The prevailing southerly and southeasterly wind direction determines the main pollen influx of tree species from the areas of their growth south of the Russia, this problem was considered in articles about pollen delta. The features of the morphological structure and fossilization of pollen transport to the Arctic from the south and its detection in the and the features of the productive capability and plant growing conditions are surface soil sampIes of the arctic regions (TIKHOMIROV 1950, of large significance in the pollen transfer and deposition. KUPRIYANOVA 1951). In subsequent years, studies of current Zusammenfassung: Im Rahmen des internationalen Projektes "System Lap­ pollen rain, pollen and spore transport and their relationship tewsee 2000" wurden während der russisch-deutschen Expeditionen "LENA with sub-fossil spectra and current vegetation were carried out 98" und "LENA 99" erstmalig Untersuchungen zur jährlichen Deposition von on Severnaya Zemlya, Novaya Zemlya and Spitsbergen (KA­ Pollen und Sporen in verschiedenen Regionen des Lena-Deltas, im asiatischen LUGINA et al. 1981, SEREBRYANNY et al. 1984, VAN DER KNAAP Sektor der Arktis, durchgeführt. Drei Pollen/Sporen-Fallen wurden entlang ei­ nes meridionalen Deltaprofils aufgestellt (Juli 1998-August 1999) im Ein­ 1990). klang mit der Methodik des "European Pollen Monitoring Program". Die Er­ gebnisse der Pollen/Sporen-Analyse des Inhaltes dieser Fallen wurden mit Due to the European Pollen Monitoring Pro gram developed in dem umgebenden Pflanzenreich verglichen. Die Resultate zeigten, dass sich 1996, it became possible using one common sampling and die heutigen Pollen/Sporen-Spektren aus Pollen der lokalen Pflanzen und windeingetragenen Pollen zusammensetzen. Die Abhängigkeit der Ablage­ processing methodology to determine the composition of an­ rung windeingetragener Pollen vom Charakter der Windbedingungen in dieser nual recent spore-pollen spectra, compare them, investigate Region wird deutlich. Die dominierenden südlichen und südöstlichen Winde their change in time and space and identify and investigate the im Delta bedingen den Eintrag von Holzpflanzen-Pollen, deren heutige Ver­ factors that determine the formation character of different breitungsgebiete sich südlich vom Lena-Delta befinden. Die Besonderheiten der morphologischen Struktur und der Pollenfossilisation, sowie die Bedin­ spectra. gungen des Pflanzenwachstums und ihre Produktivität sind von großer Bedeu­ tung für den Transport und die Ablagerung von Pollen. This study at the present stage aims to analyze data on the poI­ len rain deposition throughout the year in the Lena Delta, compare the results obtained with the composition of local ve­ getation and the wind regime character of the study area and INTRODUCTION reveal the factors influencing the formation of current spore­ pollen spectra (SAVELlEVA et al. 2000, 2000a, DOROZHKINA et Pollen and spore analysis is widely used in paleogeographical al. 2000). studies to reconstruct the vegetation and climate in the past. However, the results of paleogeographical reconstruction based on the interpretation of palynological data can be METHODS AND SITES distorted to a great extent due to inconsistency between the spore-pellen spectrum and the actual vegetation that existed at Field methods a given time. The composition of the fossil palynospectrum depends on several factors. These are the composition of local To reveal the pollen transfer character, three traps were set up vegetation at the time of spectrum forrnation, the abundance of in the Lena Delta along the meridional delta profile (PAVLOVA & DOROZHKINA 1999) (Fig. 1). The pollen traps were estab­ lished in compliance with the requirements of the European I Geographical Research Institute, St. Petersburg State University, Laboratory Pollen Monitoring Program (HICKS et al. 1996). of Investigation of Environment Evolution, 41 Sredniy str., 199004 St. Petcrsburg. Russian Federation. <[email protected]> State Research Center of Russian Federation Arctic and Antarctic Research A pollen trap presents a container (plastic bucket) of 5 liters Institute (AARI), 38 Beringa str., 199397 St. Petersburg, Russian Federati­ with a tightly closing cone-like cover of 30 cm in diameter. In on. <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> the center of the cover there is a hole of 5 cm in diameter. The Manuscript received 07 December 2000, accepted 30 July 2001 container bottom is 3-5 cm covered with glycerin to which se- 115 N • pollen trap station (L-1 -Yugus-Jie; L-2 - Sagastyr Island; L-3Samoilov Island) .... meteostation Fig. 1: Location of spore-pellen traps in the Lena Delta and wind rose-diagrams. (1- Dunay; 2 - Samoilov Island; 3 - Stolb) Abb. 1: Lage der Sporen-Pollenfallen im Lena-Delta und die zugehörigen Windrosen. Fig. 2: Pollen trap set up on Sagastyr Island. Abb. 2: Pollenfalle auf der Insel Sagastyr. veral thymol crystals and 10-20 ml offormalin are added. The The pollen traps were set up for aperiod of 1 year from July trap is buried into the ground so that its cover is at the same le­ 1998 to August 1999. The content of the pollen traps when vel with the surrounding surface (Fig. 2). they were recovered, presented water (atmospheric precipita­ tion) with numerous remains of insects (mosquitoes, caterpil­ A herbarium was collected within a 30 m radius (according to lars, etc.), excrements of mammals (musk-ox, lemmings) and guidelines for mapping the vegetation around the pollen traps, a mineral fraction (clayey-sandy particles). The volume of the HICKS et al. 1996) from each trap and the species composition samples comprised 0.5-2 liters. was determined (Tab.1). 116 Plant species L-l L-2 L-3 Plant species L-l L-2 L-3 Graminaceae (Poaceae) Saxifragaceae Arctagrostis latifolia x Chrysosplenium tetrandrum x Arctagrostis arundinacea x Saxifraga cernna x Deshampsia caespitosa ssp. borealis x Saxifraga foliolosa x Dupontia fisheri x Saxifraga hirculus x x x Dupontia psilosantha x Saxifraga nelsoniana x x x Hierochloe pauciflora x Koeleria asiatica x x Rosaceae Poa arctica x x x Dryas octopetala x x x Poa paucispicula x Dryas punctata x Cyperaceae Fabaceae Carex aquatilis ssp. stans x x Astragalus umbellatus x Carex concolor x Eriophorum polystachion x Ericaceae Eriophorum vaginatum x Arctous alpina x Juncaceae Vacciniaceae Juncus biglumis x Vaccinium uliginosum x Luzula confusa x Luzula multiflora x Plumbaginaceae Luzula nivalis x Armerio maritima x Luzula tundricola x Polemoniaceae Salicaceae Polemonium boreale x Salix glauca x x Salix nummularia x Boraginaceae Salix pulchra x Myosotis asiatica x x x Salix reptans x x x Polygonaceae Scrophulariaceae Lagotis glauca ssp. minor x x Polygonum bistorta ssp. ellipticum x Pedicularis lanata x Polygonum tripterocarpum x Pedicularis oederi x Polygonum viviparum x Pedicularis sudetica ssp. interioroides x x x Pedicularis villosa x Caryophyllaceae Minuartia arctica x Valerianaceae Stellaria ciliatosepala x Valeriana capitata x x Ranunculaceae Compositae Caltha arctica x x Artemisia tilesii x Caltha caespitosa x Nardosmia frigida x Delphinium brachycentrum x Senecio congestus (arcticus) x Ranunculus alpinis x Taraxacum ceratophorum x Ranunculus pygmaeus x Papaveraceae Equisetaceae Equisetum arvense ssp. boreale x Papaver angustifolium x x Papaver pulvinatum x x ~ Cruciferae (Brassicaceae) Aulacomnium turgidum x Calliergon giganteum x x Cardamine digitata x Drepanocladus sp. x Cardamine pratensis x Hylocomium splendens x Draba borealis x Sphagnum orientale x Draba hirta x Tomenthypnum nitens x x Draba juvenilis x Parrya nudicaulis x Tab. 1: List of plants observedin the area of establishment of pollen traps. Tab. 1: Liste der Pflanzenin der Umgebungder Pollenfallen. 117 Laboratory methods shape and a size of up to 12-15 m in diameter. The central parts of polygons are swampy. The vegetation is represented The content of pollen traps was treated using a method de­ by herbaceous-dwarf
Recommended publications
  • Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description
    Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description Prepared by: Michael A. Kost, Dennis A. Albert, Joshua G. Cohen, Bradford S. Slaughter, Rebecca K. Schillo, Christopher R. Weber, and Kim A. Chapman Michigan Natural Features Inventory P.O. Box 13036 Lansing, MI 48901-3036 For: Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division and Forest, Mineral and Fire Management Division September 30, 2007 Report Number 2007-21 Version 1.2 Last Updated: July 9, 2010 Suggested Citation: Kost, M.A., D.A. Albert, J.G. Cohen, B.S. Slaughter, R.K. Schillo, C.R. Weber, and K.A. Chapman. 2007. Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description. Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Report Number 2007-21, Lansing, MI. 314 pp. Copyright 2007 Michigan State University Board of Trustees. Michigan State University Extension programs and materials are open to all without regard to race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, marital status or family status. Cover photos: Top left, Dry Sand Prairie at Indian Lake, Newaygo County (M. Kost); top right, Limestone Bedrock Lakeshore, Summer Island, Delta County (J. Cohen); lower left, Muskeg, Luce County (J. Cohen); and lower right, Mesic Northern Forest as a matrix natural community, Porcupine Mountains Wilderness State Park, Ontonagon County (M. Kost). Acknowledgements We thank the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division and Forest, Mineral, and Fire Management Division for funding this effort to classify and describe the natural communities of Michigan. This work relied heavily on data collected by many present and former Michigan Natural Features Inventory (MNFI) field scientists and collaborators, including members of the Michigan Natural Areas Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Traduction EUNIS
    European Nature Information System Système d’information européen sur la nature Classification des habitats Traduction française Habitats terrestres et d’eau douce Janvier 2013 Coordination : Justine Louvel (MNHN-SPN1) Traduction, rédaction et mise en page : Justine Louvel (MNHN-SPN) et Vincent Gaudillat (MNHN- SPN) d’après une traduction préliminaire de l’entreprise DIXIT Sous la direction de : Laurent Poncet (MNHN-SPN) Nous remercions toutes les personnes sollicitées pour leurs renseignements et leur relecture, ces contributions participent à la cohérence de ce document : Olivier Argagnon (CBN2 méditerranéen de Porquerolles), Farid Bensettiti (MNHN-SPN), Jan-Bernard Bouzillé (Université Rennes 1), Emmanuel Catteau (CBN de Bailleul), Mathieu Clair (MNHN-SPN), Gilles Corriol (CBN des Pyrénées et de Midi-Pyrénées), Marc Dufrêne (SPW/DGARNE/DEMNA/OFFH3), Douglas Evans (Centre thématique européen sur la diversité biologique), Jean-Claude Felzines (Société française de phytosociologie), Hermann Guitton (CBN de Brest), Jean Ichter (MNHN-SPN), Arnault Lalanne (Ministère de l’écologie, du développement durable et de l’énergie), Noëmie Michez (MNHN-SPN), Virgile Noble (CBN méditerranéen de Porquerolles), Julie Reymann (CBN de Corse), Gilles Thébaud (Université de Clermont-Ferrand). Crédits photographiques : Stéphane Cordonnier (CEN Auvergne), Vincent Gaudillat (MNHN-SPN), Philippe Gourdain (MNHN-SPN), Arnaud Horellou (MNHN-SPN), Jean Ichter (MNHN-SPN), Alain Lagrave - CBN de Corse, Justine Louvel (MNHN-SPN), Stéphane Perera (CBN du Massif Central), Renaud Puissauve (MNHN-SPN), Manuelle Richeux (MNHN-SPN), Romain Sordello (MNHN-SPN). Cette traduction est un outil de travail pour une meilleure appropriation de la classification des habitats EUNIS. Dans tous les cas, la version originale fait référence. Elle est diffusée sur le site de l’INPN dans sa version 2008 (http://inpn.mnhn.fr/, rubrique « Téléchargements »).
    [Show full text]
  • Nomenclatural and Taxonomic Notes on Jacobaea Borysthenica (Asteraceae) and Some Related Taxa Sergei L
    https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj76.06.473 Nomenclatural and taxonomic notes on Jacobaea borysthenica (Asteraceae) and some related taxa Sergei L. MOSYAKIN, Natalia M. SHIYAN M.G. Kholodny Institute of Botany, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 2 Tereschenkivska Str., Kyiv 01004, Ukraine [email protected] Mosyakin S.L., Shiyan N.M. 2019. Nomenclatural and taxonomic notes on Jacobaea borysthenica (Asteraceae) and some related taxa. Ukrainian Botanical Journal, 76(6): 473–485. Abstract. Following our recent lectotypification (with a specimen from G-DC) of the name Senecio praealtus Bertol. var. borysthenicus DC. validated by de Candolle based on Andrzejowski's and Besser's specimens from Ukraine, we provide here information on additional original specimens of that taxon (KW: Besser and Turczaninow historical collections), which is now recognized as Jacobaea borysthenica (DC.) B.Nord. & Greuter and which was until recently widely accepted as Senecio borysthenicus (DC.) Andrz. ex Czern. (Asteraceae). In particular, there are two isolectotypes in KW collected by Andrzejowski near Kyslyakivka (now Lymany, Mykolayiv Region, Ukraine), as well as some other specimens collected near Zaporizhzhya (Andrzejowski) and in southern Podolia (Besser and/or Andrzejowski). Some related Eastern European taxa of the taxonomically complicated Jacobaea vulgaris Gaertn. (= Senecio jacobaea L.) aggregate and misapplied names are discussed as well. The identity of the name Senecio divaricatus Andrz. (nom. illeg., non L.) is clarified; it is a synonym of Jacobaea borysthenica. It is also confirmed that Senecio podolianus Panigrahi is an illegitimate replacement name for S. borysthenicus. Jacobaea borysthenica seems to be closely related to J. andrzejowskyi (Tzvelev) B.Nord. & Greuter and J.
    [Show full text]
  • Dokumentacja Przyrodnicza Projektowanego Rezerwatu Przyrody "Bagienna Dolina Rospudy"
    Klub Przyrodników Dokumentacja przyrodnicza projektowanego rezerwatu przyrody "Bagienna Dolina Rospudy" wykonano w ramach projektu: LIFE11 NAT/PL/423 „Ochrona torfowisk alkalicznych (7230) w młodoglacjalnym krajobrazie Polski północnej” Ewa Gutowska, Filip Jarzombkowski, Katarzyna Kotowska, Arkadiusz Gawroński, Agnieszka Gawrońska Świebodzin 2016 Strona 1 z 74 Projekt i zakupy finansowane ze środków Narodowego Funduszu Ochrony Środowiska i Gospodarki Wodnej oraz unijnego instrumentu finansowania LIFE+ Dokumentacja przyrodnicza projektowanego rezerwatu przyrody "Bagienna Dolina Rospudy" Spis treści 1 WSTĘP ............................................................................................................................. 4 2 METODYKA PRAC PRZEPROWADZONYCH NA POTRZEBY DOKUMENTACJI ...................................................................................................... 4 2.1 METODY PRAC PRZEPROWADZONYCH NA POTRZEBY SPORZĄDZENIA NINIEJSZEJ DOKUMENTACJI .................................................................................................................................. 4 3 OGÓLNE DANE O PROJEKTOWANYM REZERWACIE......................................... 8 3.1 TYPOLOGIA REZERWATU .................................................................................................................. 8 3.2 REJESTR POWIERZCHNIOWY - WYKAZ DZIAŁEK EWIDENCYJNYCH ............................................ 8 3.3 STAN WŁASNOŚCI GRUNTÓW .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • VASCULAR PLANTS of MINNESOTA a Checklist and Atlas
    VASCULAR PLANTS of MINNESOTA This page intentionally left blank VASCULAR PLANTS of MINNESOTA A Checklist and Atlas Gerald B. Ownbey and Thomas Morley UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MINNEAPOLIS • LONDON The University of Minnesota Press gratefully acknowledges the generous assistance provided for the publication of this book by the Margaret W. Harmon Fund Minnesota Department of Transportation Minnesota Landscape Arboretum Minnesota State Horticultural Society Olga Lakela Herbarium Fund—University of Minnesota—Duluth Natural Heritage Program of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Copyright © 1991 by the Regents of the University of Minnesota. First paperback printing 1992 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Published by the University of Minnesota Press 2037 University Avenue Southeast, Minneapolis, MN 55455 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Ownbey, Gerald B., 1916- Vascular plants of Minnesota : a checklist and atlas / Gerald B. Ownbey and Thomas Morley. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8166-1915-8 1. Botany-Minnesota. 2. Phytogeography—Minnesota— Maps. I. Morley, Thomas. 1917- . II. Title. QK168.096 1991 91-2064 582.09776-dc20 CIP The University of Minnesota is an equal-opportunity educator and employer. Contents Introduction vii Part I. Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Minnesota 1 Pteridophytes 3 Gymnosperms 6 Angiosperms 7 Appendix 1. Excluded names 81 Appendix 2. Tables 82 Part II. Atlas of the Vascular Plants of Minnesota 83 Index of Generic and Common Names 295 This page intentionally left blank Introduction The importance of understanding the vegetation of al distributional comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Plants on the North Slope | the North Slope Borough
    8/17/2020 Common Plants on the North Slope | The North Slope Borough CALENDAR CONTACT Harry K. Brower Jr. , Mayor COMMON PLANTS ON THE NORTH SLOPE Home » Departments » Wildlife Management » Other Topics of Interest » Common Plants on the North Slope Plants are an important subsistence resource for residents across the North Slope. This page provides information on some of the common plants found on the North Slope of Alaska, including plants not used for subsistence. Plant names (common, scientific and Iñupiaq) are provided as well as descriptions, pictures and traditional uses. The resources used for identification are listed here as well as other resources for information on plants. List of Common Plants and others of the North Slope PDF Version Photo Identification of these Common Plants Unknowns - Got any ideas? Please send them to us! Plant Identification and Other Resources Thes pages are a work in progress. If you see any misinformation, misidentifications, or have pictures to add, please contact us. Information on the Iñupiaq names and traditional uses of these plants is especially welcomed. Check out "Unknown" pictures at bottom of page. Thanks! DISCLAIMER: This guide includes traditional uses of plants and other vegetation. The information is not intended to replace the advice of a physician or be used as a guide for self- medication. Neither the author nor the North Slope Borough claims that information in this guide will cure any illness. Just as prescription medicines can have different effects on www.north-slope.org/departments/wildlife-management/other-topics/common-plants-north-slope 1/3 8/17/2020 Common Plants on the North Slope | The North Slope Borough individuals, so too can plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Ecosystems in Peril, 1997
    `Arctic Ecosystems in Peril Report of the Arctic Goose Habitat Working Group A Special Publication of the Arctic Goose Joint Venture of the North American Waterfowl Management Plan ` Arctic Ecosystems in Peril Arctic Ecosystems in Peril Report of the Arctic Goose Habitat Working Group A Special Publication of the Arctic Goose Joint Venture of the North American Waterfowl Management Plan Edited by: Bruce D.J. Batt (Second Printing) WORKING GROUP MEMBERS: BRUCE BATT DUCKS UNLIMITED, INC. * KENNETH ABRAHAM ONTARIO MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES ** RAY ALISAUSKAS CANADIAN WILDLIFE SERVICE DAVE ANKNEY UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO BRAD BALES OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE BRUCE BARBOUR NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY SOLANGE BRAULT UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS ** BOB BROMLEY GNWT DEPARTMENT OF RENEWABLE RESOURCES DALE CASWELL CANADIAN WILDLIFE SERVICE ** EVAN COOCH SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY ** GARY COSTANZO VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF GAME & INLAND FISHERIES ROBERT HELM LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE & FISHERIES BOB JEFFERIES UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO ** MIKE JOHNSON NORTH DAKOTA GAME & FISH DEPARTMENT ** ROBERT ROCKWELL AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ** DON RUSCH WISCONSIN COOPERATIVE WILDLIFE RESEARCH ** UNIT BOB TROST U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE * CHAIRMAN ** WRITING TEAM MEMBERS ` Page 2 ` Arctic Ecosystems in Peril Arctic Ecosystems in Peril: Report of the Arctic Goose Habitat Working Group CONTRIBUTORS The publication costs of this report were provided by: Ducks Unlimited, Inc. Canadian Wildlife Service U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service North Dakota Game and Fish Department Texas Parks and Wildlife Department SUGGESTED CITATIONS Batt, B. D. J., editor. 1997. Arctic ecosystems in peril: report of the Arctic Goose Habitat Working Group. Arctic Goose Joint Venture Special Publication. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Am Fachbereich Biologie Der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
    Dissertation Zur Erlangung des Grades Doktor der Naturwissenschaften Am Fachbereich Biologie Der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz Renat Aglyamzyanov geb. am 18.08.1957 in Irbit (Russland) Mainz, 2006 2 Dekan: 1. Berichterstatter: 2. Berichterstatter: Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 17. Juli 2006 3 Inhaltsverzeichnis 1. Zusammenfassung 4 2. Fragestellung 4 3. Material und Methoden 8 3.1. Material 8 3.2. Methoden 8 4. Besprechung der diagnostischen Merkmale 8 4.1. Punktierung der Halbdecken 8 4.2. Schwarze Zeichnung des Körpers 8 4.3. Geschlechtsdimorphismus 10 4.4. Körperfärbung. 10 4.5. Genitalien 10 5. Bestimmungsschlüssel für die paläarktischen Arten der Gattung Lygus Hahn 12 6. Übersicht über die Lygus-Arten 26 - Synonyme - Vergleichende Bemerkungen - Futterpflanzen - Geographische Verbreitung - Die untersuchten Exemplare 6.1. Lygus discrepans Reuter, 1906 26 6.2. Lygus gemellatus (Herrich-Schaeffer, 1835) 27 6.3. Lygus hsiaoi Zheng & Yu, 1992 30 6.4. Lygus israelensis Linnavuori, 1962 32 6.5. Lygus italicus Wagner, 1950 34 6.6. Lygus izyaslavi Aglyamzyanov, 1994 36 6.7. Lygus maritimus Wagner, 1949 37 6.8. Lygus martensi Aglyamzyanov, 2003 40 6.9. Lygus monticola Aglyamzyanov, 1994 42 6.10. Lygus orientis Aglyamzyanov, 1994 43 6.11. Lygus pachycnemis Reuter, 1879 44 6.12. Lygus paradiscrepans Zheng & Yu, 1992 45 6.13. Lygus poluensis (Wagner, 1967) 46 6.14. Lygus pratensis (Linnaeus, 1758 49 6.15. Lygus punctatus (Zetterstedt, 1838) 52 6.16. Lygus rugulipennis Poppius, 1911 55 6.17. Lygus sibiricus Aglyamzyanov, 1990 58 6.18. Lygus tibetanus Zheng & Yu, 1992 60 6.19. Lygus wagneri Remane, 1955 62 Literatur 64 Danksagungen 70 Lebenslauf 71 4 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Plants of the North Slope
    NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH Department of Wildlife Management P.O. Box 69 Barrow, Alaska 99723 Phone: (907) 852-0350 FAX: (907) 852 0351 Taqulik Hepa, Director Common Plants of the North Slope Plants are an important subsistence resource for residents across the North Slope. This document provides information on some of the common plants found on the North Slope of Alaska, including plants not used for subsistence. Plant names (common, scientific and Iñupiaq) are provided as well as descriptions, pictures and traditional uses. The resources used for identification are listed below as well as other resources for information on plants. DISCLAIMER: This guide includes traditional uses of plants and other vegetation. The information is not intended to replace the advice of a physician or be used as a guide for self- medication. Neither the author nor the North Slope Borough claims that information in this guide will cure any illness. Just as prescription medicines can have different effects on individuals, so too can plants. Historically, medicinal plants were used only by skilled and knowledgeable people, such as traditional healers, who knew how to identify the plants and avoid misidentifications with toxic plants. Inappropriate medicinal use of plants may result in harm or death. LIST OF PLANTS • Alaska Blue Anemone • Alder / Nunaŋiak or Nunaniat • Alpine Blueberry / Asiat or Asiavik • Alpine Fescue • Alpine Forget-Me-Not • Alpine Foxtail • Alpine Milk Vetch • Alpine Wormwood • Arctic Daisy • Arctic Forget-Me-Not • Arctic Groundsel • Arctic Lupine
    [Show full text]
  • Kazakhstan Ministry of Environmental Protection
    Republic of Kazakhstan Ministry of Environmental protection THE FOURTH NATIONAL REPORT ON PROGRESS IN IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN ASTANA, 2009 Content Chapter I - Overview of Biodiversity Status, Trends and Threats 3 Chapter II - Current Status of National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans 19 Chapter III - Sectoral and cross-sectoral integration or mainstreaming of biodiversity Considerations 28 Chapter IV - Conclusions: Progress Towards the 2010 Target and Implementation of the Strategic Plan 46 Appendix I - Information concerning reporting Party and preparation of national report 76 Appendix II - Further sources of information 77 Appendix III - Progress towards Targets of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation and Programme of Work on Protected Areas 78 Appendix IV - National indicators used in the report (optional) 91 2 Chapter I - Overview of Biodiversity Status, Trends and Threats Republic of Kazakhstan is situated in the depth of Euroasian continent, it takes central and south latitudes of a temperate zone from 55°26' n.l. to 40°59' n.l. and from 46°05' to 87°03' e.l. Length of the territory of the country – 1600 km from the north to the south and 3000km from the west to the east, the area is 2,7 million km 2. The territory of Kazakhstan has a unique set of landscapes: from deserts to mountains and ecosystems of inland seas. Dry and sub-humid lands occupy more than 75% of the territory of the Republic of Kazakhstan. They concentrate more than 40% of the species composition of all biological diversity. In the face of increasing speed of economic development of the country and enhancement of the use of natural resources the issue on further improvement of the territorial nature protection system is becoming important.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Classification of Plant Communities in the Central Parkland Natural Sub-Region of Alberta
    A Preliminary Classification of Plant Communities in the Central Parkland Natural Sub-Region of Alberta. Prepared for: Alberta Sustainable Resource Development Public Lands Division Resource Data Branch Edmonton, Alberta Prepared by: Matthew Wheatley and Jerry Bentz Geowest Environmental Consultants Ltd. Suite 203 4208 – 97th Street Edmonton, Alberta, T5K 2J6 February 2002 Plant Communities of Alberta’s Central Parkland TABLE OF CONTENTS Objectives ............................................................................................................................1 Study Area Background......................................................................................................1 Methods ...............................................................................................................................2 Results..................................................................................................................................5 Dwarf Shrubland.............................................................................................................5 Evergreen.....................................................................................................................5 Broad-leaved ............................................................................................................5 Evergreen dwarf-shrubland ................................................................................5 ARCTOSTAPHYLOS UVA-URSI DWARF-SHRUBLAND ALLIANCE............5 Arctostaphylos uva-ursi..................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Syntaxonomic and Nomenclatural Novelties in the Wetland Vegetation of Baikal Siberia (Russian Federation) Victor Chepinoga (*)
    LAZAROA 35: 169-179. 2014 doi: 10.5209/rev_LAZA.2014.v35.45251 ISSN: 0210-9778 Syntaxonomic and nomenclatural novelties in the wetland vegetation of Baikal Siberia (Russian Federation) Victor Chepinoga (*) Abstract: Chepinoga, v. Syntaxonomic and nomenclatural novelties in the wetland vegetation of Baikal Siberia (Russian Federation). Lazaroa 35: 169-179 (2014). This paper presents some results of research into vegetation diversity in water bodies and streams in Baikal Siberia, a region in southeast Siberia. The article contains the original diagnoses of five new associations ( Callitricho palustris-Su - bularietum aquaticae, Lemno turioniferae-Thacletum natantis, Ceratophyllo demersi-Eleocharitetum mamillatae, Cari - ceum pseudocuraicae, Scirpetum orientalis ), the typification of one existing association name ( Glycerietum spiculosae ), and the correction of another name: Tephroseridetum palustris Mirkin & al. 1985. Keywords: Baikal Siberia, Bidentetea tripartitae , eastern Siberia, Littorelletea uniflorae , new syntaxa, Phragmito- Magnocaricetea , Russian Federation, wetland vegetation. Resumen: Chepinoga, v. Novedades sintaxonómicas y nomenclaturales sobre la vegetación de humedales de Baikal (Siberia, Rusia). Lazaroa 35: 169-179 (2014). Se presentan en este trabajo los resultados de la investigación realizada en los arroyos y charcas de Baikal, una región del sureste de Siberia (Rusia). el articulo contiene las diagnosis originales de cinco asociaciones nuevas: Callitricho pa - lustris-Subularietum aquaticae, Lemno turioniferae-Thacletum
    [Show full text]