Download PDF (46.9

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download PDF (46.9 JOBNAME: Chan PAGE: 1 SESS: 5 OUTPUT: Wed Feb 21 09:47:12 2018 Index Abe, Shinzō 62, 80, 83, 88 balance of power 81–3, 88–9 Afghanistan 99, 188–9 Baltics 34 Africa 6–7, 11, 16, 24–9, 31, 36, 44, Bangkok 24–5, 32, 82, 87 49, 51, 53, 58, 61, 68–9, 71, 80, Bangladesh 32, 64, 81, 87–90 103, 120 Bangladesh-China-India-Myanmar African Barometer 51, 106 (BCIM) Economic Corridor 7, 9, African century 120–21 81, 88 African Union 27, 121 Bank of China 68 Alaska 31, 34, 78 Beijing 21, 29, 31, 35, 44–5, 61, Alstom 21, 44 65–6, 83 Arctic Ocean 7 Olympic Games 21, 44 Argentina 23–4, 29 Belarus 29–30 Asia 6, 11, 15, 21, 24, 30–32, 35–6, Belgium 20 44, 57–8, 61, 65, 68, 71, 79, Belt and Road Forum for International 87, 89–90, 100, 102–3, 116, Cooperation 14–15, 102, 112, 120 117 responses to OBOR 76–91 Belt and Road Initiative 7, 14–15, 51, Asia-Pacific 11, 33, 77, 79 68, 80, 83, 85, 90, 107 Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Berlin 83 (APEC) 28, 102 Boao Forum 102, 107 Asian Development Bank (ADB) 14, Bombardier 21, 44 33, 57, 62–5, 67–8, 71, 77, 80, Bretton Woods system 51, 63, 107, 91, 100 114 Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank BRICS 14, 59–61, 70, 89, 106 bank 70 (AIIB) ix, 11, 14–15, 57, 60, their GDPs 61 61–5, 66, 68–70, 76–7, 79, 83, see also Contingency Reserve 85–6, 89, 91, 100–101, 105, 107, Arrangement 70, 107; 114, 116 New Development Bank share holdings of 62 Brunei 90, 99 Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) 24–5, 36, 70, Cambodia 25, 57, 90 116 see also Kampuchea ASEAN Infrastructure Fund 57 Central Asia ix, 6–7, 12, 21, 25, 33, China-ASEAN Fund 69 35–6, 44, 78–80, 83–5, 99, 116 Master Plan on Connectivity 10 Chan Lai-Ha xii, 63, 64 Atlantic Ocean 26, 28–9 Chengdu 29–30, 67 Australia 23, 49, 70 Chiang Mai Initiative Austria 20 Multilateralisation 70, 105, 107 129 Gerald Chan - 9781788112079 Downloaded from Elgar Online at 09/24/2021 12:26:12PM via free access Columns Design XML Ltd / Job: Chan-Understanding_Chinas_new_diplomacy / Division: Index /Pg. Position: 1 / Date: 5/2 JOBNAME: Chan PAGE: 2 SESS: 4 OUTPUT: Wed Feb 21 09:47:12 2018 130 Understanding China’s new diplomacy Chile 29 Dreams 37, 89, 114 China, People’s Republic of Duisburg xii, 29 as a civilisation state 9 Duterte, Rodrigo 36, 82 demography 45, 52 development in western region 9–10 East Africa 26–7, 29 FDI 36, 72 East Asia 10, 53, 76–8, 88, 116 Five Year Plan 15 Egypt 61 as a global leader 120 Eurasia 9, 11, 16, 24, 29, 31, 34, 69, military base 27 71, 84, 103, 120 Ministry of Commerce 23 Eurasian Economic Union 10, 33, 35 Ministry of Finance 66 ‘Eurasian Initiative’ 83 research and development 47–50 Europe 6–7, 10–11, 20–22, 25, 29, science and technology 47–50 32, 35–6, 44–5, 47, 61, 68, 79, State Administration of Foreign 83–5, 87–9, 102–3, 109, 116, Exchange 66 119–20 state capitalism 46–7 European Bank for Reconstruction white paper 20 and Development 64, 100 China-African Cooperation Summit European Union (EU) 16, 58–9, 96 16 Juncker Plan 10 China Construction Bank 51 Export Import Bank of China (EXIM) China Investment Corporation 66 26, 28, 32, 51, 66, 68, 112 China-Pakistan Economic Corridor 7, 66–7, 117 Five Basic Principles of Peaceful China Railway Group 31–2, 45, 47 Co-Existence 101 China Railway Rolling Stock France 15–16, 20–21, 26–7, 30, 34–5, Corporation (CRRC) 24, 44, 50 43–4, 77, 82, 85 Chinese Communist Party 9, 12, 49 functionalism 94–5, 102–4 Politburo 12–13 Chinese foreign aid 24–5, 66 G20 61, 70, 102 Chinese foreign policy 6, 8, 76, Gao Bai xii, 5, 46 101–2, 112–18 geo-developmentalism 51–2, 94–109, ‘go out’ policy 9, 21, 44, 50–51, 113 117–19 definition 97 ‘go west’ policy 36 testing 104, 106 ten conundrums of 114–18 theoretical challenges 106–8 Chongqing 29–30, 67 see also geo-neo-functionalism; Cold War 26, 103 neo-functionalism with Chinese Colonialism 26 characteristics Conference on Interactions and geo-economics 36, 51, 68, 71, 99–100 Confidence-Building Measures in see also geopolitics Asia 102, 107 geo-neo-functionalism 37, 71 connectivity 6–8, 98–9, 103, 113, 119 see also geo-developmentalism; cooperation 53, 71, 94–5, 97–8, neo-functionalism with Chinese 100–101, 104, 108, 117 characteristics geopolitics 13, 20, 36, 51, 68, 71, 88, developmentalism 94–5 89, 99–100, 113, 120 Djibouti 26–8, 118 see also geo-economics Gerald Chan - 9781788112079 Downloaded from Elgar Online at 09/24/2021 12:26:12PM via free access Columns Design XML Ltd / Job: Chan-Understanding_Chinas_new_diplomacy / Division: Index /Pg. Position: 2 / Date: 5/2 JOBNAME: Chan PAGE: 3 SESS: 4 OUTPUT: Wed Feb 21 09:47:12 2018 Index 131 Germany 15, 20–21, 26–7, 29–30, 33, infrastructure development 13–14, 35, 43–4, 77, 82–3 21–2, 29, 33, 35, 46, 58, 62, 65, global financial order 57, 69–70 71, 79, 86, 88, 90, 98, 101, 102, global governance 91, 107–8, 104, 106, 112, 114, 118–19 115–18 financing of 57–72 global power change 113 infrastructure diplomacy 6, 8, 58–9, global public goods 71, 96, 103, 112, 62, 72, 79, 80 113–14 innovation 49, 52, 117 global responsibility 71, 96 integration 96, 120, 108 Global South 34–5, 51, 53, 72, 95, intellectual properties 48, 50, 105 105, 107, 109, 113 intergovernmental organisations 62, globalisation ix, 37, 99, 113, 120 107 good governance 95, 105, 106 international development 106–7 Greater Mekong Subregion 57 international finance 106–7 Gulf of Aden 26 international land order 36 international maritime order 36 Hamburg 29, 44 International Monetary Fund (IMF) high-speed rail 5–6, 9, 20–56, 77, 80, 33, 63, 70–71, 95, 105, 106 83–6, 97–8, 112 international organisations 16, 102, market of 22 104, 106–7, 112 origins and development 43–5 international political economy 20, 94, ten reasons for China’s rise in 112 45–52 international relations 35, 53, 77, 91, Holland 20 94, 99, 101, 103–4, 106, 108–9, hub-and-spokes structure 95 112–13, 115–16 Hungary 32 International Union of Railways 20, 44 imperialism 26–95 Iran 22, 88, 89, 119 India 7, 12, 16, 20, 26, 29, 32–3, 45, Italy 15, 20, 27, 34, 35, 43 52, 59, 64, 77, 80, 85, 87–90, Jakarta 23, 32, 50, 81, 86 99, 109, 119 Japan 11, 15, 16, 20, 21, 23, 25, 27, Act East policy 10 33, 35, 43, 44, 45, 49, 52, 53, Go West policy 10 61, 62–5, 70, 76–8, 86–90, 99 Mausam Project 10 responses to OBOR 80–83 Indian Ocean 6–7, 116 ‘Silk Road Diplomacy’ 10 Indochina 7, 24–5, 29, 44, 82 Jin Liqun 62, 65 Indonesia 6, 23, 32, 50, 57, 61, 64, 69, 77, 81, 86, 90, 99, 119 Kampuchea 83 Global Maritime Fulcrum 10, see also Cambodia 86 Kawasaki 21, 44 Industrial and Commercial Bank Kazakhstan 6, 29–30, 69, 80, 90, 99, of China 51, 68 119 industrial overcapacity 9, 100, 112, ‘Bright Road’ initiative 10 116 Kenya 6, 26, 27, 28, 53 industrial policy 52 Kim, Jim Yong 62, 65 Industrial Revolution ix, 120 Korean War 84 Gerald Chan - 9781788112079 Downloaded from Elgar Online at 09/24/2021 12:26:12PM via free access Columns Design XML Ltd / Job: Chan-Understanding_Chinas_new_diplomacy / Division: Index /Pg. Position: 3 / Date: 5/2 JOBNAME: Chan PAGE: 4 SESS: 4 OUTPUT: Wed Feb 21 09:47:12 2018 132 Understanding China’s new diplomacy Kuala Lumpur 25, 32, 82, 87 New Development Bank (NDB) 14, Kunming 25, 67, 81, 82, 87, 88 57, 59–61, 66, 68, 69, 70,79, Kuwait 119 101, 107, 116 Kyrgyzstan 80, 99 see also BRICS bank New Silk Road initiative 2, 5–17, 76, Laos 7, 24, 25, 29, 32, 57, 69, 82, 90, 86 99 new world order 91, 108–9, 114 Latin America 22, 23, 24, 28–9, 31, New York 30, 44, 78, 97 69, 76 New Zealand xii, 20, 49, 70 see also South America Nigeria 25–8, 53 Li Keqiang 12, 16, 27, 28–9, 31, 33, non-interference 101, 108 36, 117, 120 North America 36, 47 Libya 34 North Atlantic Treaty Organisation Lin Yifu 12 (NATO) 89 Liu Yazhou 10 North Korea 77, 83, 84, 85, 90, 99 Liu Zhijun 46, 48 Obama, Barak 96 Malaysia 7, 20, 23, 25, 32, 58, 67, 90, Oceania 7 99 see also South Pacific Marshall Plan 102 Oman 64 Mediterranean 6–7, 27, 67, 116 ‘one belt, one road’ (OBOR) initiative mercantilism 94, 100 1, 5–17, 34–8, 61, 67–9, 71, 83, Middle East 6, 10, 12, 21, 44, 61, 67, 84, 86, 89, 90, 91, 112 87, 88 Asian responses to 76–91 Mohamad Mahathir 21, 25 brief introduction of 6–8 Mongolia 7, 30, 62, 80, 96, 99 definition 1, 6 ‘Prairie Road’ 10 economic corridors 6–7 Morocco 20 Japan’s responses to 80–83 Moscow 30, 31, 32, 35 origins of 1 Mozambique 51 South Korea’s responses to 83–5 multilateral development banks 34, 63 Taiwan’s responses to 85–6 multilateral financial institutions 57, ten myths of 8–16 63, 68, 69–72, 102, 114 theorising of 94–109 Myanmar 7, 34, 64, 67, 87, 88, 89, see also Belt and Road Initiative 90, 99, 117 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development National Development and Reform (OCED) 95, 107 Commission (NDRC) 5, 7, 12–13 Pacific Ocean 28–9 national interest 72, 107, 116, 120 Pakistan 64, 66, 87, 88, 89, 90, 99, neo-functionalism with Chinese 118 characteristics 36–7, 71, 102–4, Pan-Asia 21, 25, 87 108 Panama Canal 29 see also geo-developmentalism; Park Geun-hye 83–4 geo-neo-functionalism peace and governance 106–8 neoliberalism 104–5, 109, 113 peace-building 36, 71 Nepal 34, 99 People’s Bank of China 66 Gerald Chan - 9781788112079 Downloaded from Elgar Online at 09/24/2021 12:26:12PM via free access Columns Design XML Ltd / Job: Chan-Understanding_Chinas_new_diplomacy / Division: Index /Pg.
Recommended publications
  • Publication: BELT and ROAD INITIATIVE (BRI)
    “CGSS is a Non-Profit Institution with a mission to help improve policy and decision-making through analysis and research” Copyright © Center for Global & Strategic Studies (CGSS) All rights reserved Printed in Pakistan Published in April, 2017 ISBN 978 969 7733 05 7 Please do not disseminate, distribute or reproduce, in whole or part, this report without prior consent of CGSS CGSS Center for Global & Strategic Studies, Islamabad 3rd Floor, 1-E, Ali Plaza, Jinnah Avenue, Islamabad, Pakistan Tel: +92-51-8319682 Email: [email protected] Web: www.cgss.com.pk Abstract Belt & Road Initiative (BRI) is a massive project which can be termed as a revival of the Ancient Silk Road in order to materialize the Prophecy of Asian Century through the economic expansion and infrastructural build-up by China. The project comprises of two major components that are: 21st Century Maritime Silk Route (MSR) and Silk Road Economic Belt (SREB) which is further distributed in six overland economic corridors where China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is one significant corridor. The project holds massive importance for China in particular and all the other stakeholders in general and will provide enormous opportunity for the socio-economic as well as the infrastructural development of many countries across the globe. The rationale behind China’s massive investment in this project is to attain global domination through geopolitical expansions. China’s economic activities and investment are directed to the promotion of global trade. Although the commencement of the project met with skeptical views as for few specific countries, it is China’s strategic policy to upsurge and enhance its military and economic presence in the World especially in the Indian Ocean and emerge as an economic giant by replacing USA’s superpower status.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Aamir, A. (2015a, June 27). Interview with Syed Fazl-e-Haider: Fully operational Gwadar Port under Chinese control upsets key regional players. The Balochistan Point. Accessed February 7, 2019, from http://thebalochistanpoint.com/interview-fully-operational-gwadar-port-under- chinese-control-upsets-key-regional-players/ Aamir, A. (2015b, February 7). Pak-China Economic Corridor. Pakistan Today. Aamir, A. (2017, December 31). The Baloch’s concerns. The News International. Aamir, A. (2018a, August 17). ISIS threatens China-Pakistan Economic Corridor. China-US Focus. Accessed February 7, 2019, from https://www.chinausfocus.com/peace-security/isis-threatens- china-pakistan-economic-corridor Aamir, A. (2018b, July 25). Religious violence jeopardises China’s investment in Pakistan. Financial Times. Abbas, Z. (2000, November 17). Pakistan faces brain drain. BBC. Abbas, H. (2007, March 29). Transforming Pakistan’s frontier corps. Terrorism Monitor, 5(6). Abbas, H. (2011, February). Reforming Pakistan’s police and law enforcement infrastructure is it too flawed to fix? (USIP Special Report, No. 266). Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace (USIP). Abbas, N., & Rasmussen, S. E. (2017, November 27). Pakistani law minister quits after weeks of anti-blasphemy protests. The Guardian. Abbasi, N. M. (2009). The EU and Democracy building in Pakistan. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. Accessed February 7, 2019, from https:// www.idea.int/sites/default/files/publications/chapters/the-role-of-the-european-union-in-democ racy-building/eu-democracy-building-discussion-paper-29.pdf Abbasi, A. (2017, April 13). CPEC sect without project director, key specialists. The News International. Abbasi, S. K. (2018, May 24).
    [Show full text]
  • Connectivity Through BCIM-EC 121
    Connectivity Through BCIM-EC 121 CONNECTIVITY THROUGH BCIM-EC: PROSPECTS AND CHALLENGES Sultana Yesmin∗ Abstract The paper examines the status of physical connectivity along the proposed overland routes of the BCIM economic corridor. The study tends to elucidate the areas of common interests of the BCIM countries by and large due to geo- strategic and geo-economic importance of physical connectivity in the BCIM sub- region. The paper, thereby, observes the successive developments of the BCIM Regional Cooperation Forum, since its inauguration, towards achieving its goals and objectives. Hence, the paper comes up with some policy recommendations while exploring major threats prevailing across the BCIM-EC. INTRODUCTION The Bangladesh-China-India-Myanmar (BCIM) Regional Cooperation Forum has been established with a view to boosting regional integration among the four member countries through intensifying physical connectivity and economic corridor in the region. Connecting three sub-regions together, South Asia, Southeast Asia, and East Asia, the BCIM- Economic Corridor (BCIM- EC) is not only geo-strategically significant but also geo-economically requisite for the member countries to be essential parts of global trade and business in the region. Given the importance, since the establishment, the BCIM-EC has made massive progresses towards the fulfilment of its goals and objectives along with the cooperation of the four countries. Though initially starting as a non- governmental project, the BCIM Forum is now one of the major priority agendas of the governments of the BCIM member countries in order to enhance regional connectivity and multilateral trade relations. As far as the interests of four countries from three distinct regions are concerned, it is important to specify the areas of their common interests with a view to signifying the common objectives of the BCIM-EC.
    [Show full text]
  • China's High-Speed Rail Diplomacy
    China’s High-speed Rail Diplomacy: Global Impacts and East Asian Responses Gerald Chan University of Auckland, New Zealand February 2016 Fellows Program on Peace, Governance, and Development in East Asia EAI Working Paper Knowledge-Net for a Better World The East Asia Institute (EAI) is a nonprofit and independent research organization in Korea, founded in May 2002. The EAI strives to transform East Asia into a society of nations based on liberal democracy, market economy, open society, and peace. The EAI takes no institutional position on policy issues and has no affiliation with the Korean government. All statements of fact and expressions of opinion contained in its publications are the sole responsibility of the author or authors. is a registered trademark. Copyright © 2016 by EAI This electronic publication of EAI intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of EAI documents to a non-EAI website is prohibited. EAI documents are protected under copyright law. “China’s High-speed Rail Diplomacy: Global Impacts and East Asian Responses” ISBN 979-11-86226-77-3 95340 The East Asia Institute #909 Sampoong B/D, 158 Euljiro Jung-gu, Seoul 04548 Republic of Korea Tel. 82 2 2277 1683 Fax 82 2 2277 1684 Fellows Program on Peace, Governance, and Development in East Asia China’s High-speed Rail Diplomacy: Global Impacts and East Asian Responses* Gerald Chan University of Auckland, New Zealand February 2016 Abstract China as a high-speed rail power has just begun to capture the attention of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • OPINION | the Chinese Silk Road in South & Southeast Asia: Enter
    www.ssoar.info The Chinese Silk Road in South & Southeast Asia: Enter "Counter Geopolitics" Joshi, Prateek Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Joshi, P. (2016). The Chinese Silk Road in South & Southeast Asia: Enter "Counter Geopolitics". IndraStra Global, 3, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3084253 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-NC-ND Lizenz This document is made available under a CC BY-NC-ND Licence (Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell-Keine Bearbeitung) zur (Attribution-Non Comercial-NoDerivatives). For more Information Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.de Diese Version ist zitierbar unter / This version is citable under: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-52348-4 indrastra.com http://www.indrastra.com/2016/03/OPINION-Chinese-Silk-Road-in-South-Southeast-Asia-002-03-2016-0007.html OPINION | The Chinese Silk Road in South & Southeast Asia: Enter "Counter Geopolitics" By Prateek Joshi Graduate Student in International Relations from South Asian University, New Delhi The Chinese Silk Road projects signal towards a new era of the changing geopolitical order with infrastructure corridors that would span across the Asian landmass in the form of highways, railways, industrial parks ,Oil & gas pipelines connecting the landlocked regions of hinterland China with the sea ports. Considered from the economic point of view, the projects aim to utilize the contiguity of Asian landmass to setup a network of infrastructure projects poised to benefit the vast expanse of the Asian territory and further extending westwards, knocking the door of European markets .The linkage of industrial hubs to ports via efficient transportation will ease the connectivity of hinterland industrial products.
    [Show full text]
  • China's SAARC Membership: the Debate
    International Journal of China StudiesChina’s SAARC Membership: The Debate 299 Vol. 6, No. 3, December 2015, pp. 299-311 China’s SAARC Membership: The Debate S.Y. Surendra Kumar* Department of Political Science, Bangalore University Abstract South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) has been in existence for 29 years, but has made slow progress. Despite this, many countries within and outside the region aspire to be part of this forum. As a result, SAARC is the only association in the world, which has more observer members (nine), than full-fledged members (eight). China is presently the observer member in SAARC, and working towards enhancing its role to “dialogue partner” and later on obtaining the full membership. However, China’s SAARC membership is widely debated. In this context, the paper attempts to analyse the arguments in favour and against China’s membership and examines India’s position and concerns vis-à-vis China’s elevated role in SAARC. Subsequently, it identifies and discusses the factors favouring China to become a full fledge member of SAARC. This paper concludes that China’s SAARC membership might become inevitable at some time in the future. However, the question is – can India intelligently and sophisticatedly play its cards to advance its own interests? Keywords: China, SAARC, India, South Asia 1. Introduction China’s foreign policy has evolved in recent decades to consolidate Chinese interests. For other interested countries, this could indeed become a lesson as to how to consolidate and promote their own national interests (Mahapatra, 2010; Patten, 2010). Initially, China’s Asia policy focused on Northeast and Southeast Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Security and Economy on the Belt and Road: Three Country
    SIPRI Insights on Peace and Security No. 2017/4 December 2017 SECURITY AND ECONOMY ON SUMMARY w The Belt and Road Initiative THE BELT AND ROAD: THREE (BRI) is the result of a convergence of multiple COUNTRY CASE STUDIES Chinese domestic drivers and external developments. It holds significant potential to henrik hallgren and richard ghiasy* contribute to greater connectivity and stability in participating states, yet there is I. Introduction a need to include a wider spectrum of local and This SIPRI Insights examines how China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) international stakeholders in interacts with economic and security dynamics in three sample states from order to address concerns and three different regions across the Eurasian continent, each with a diverse mitigate backlashes. political, economic, and security background: Belarus, Myanmar and Uzbek- As shown in this SIPRI istan. In order to understand the BRI’s economic and, foremost, security Insights Paper, projects on the implications in these countries, it is imperative to first briefly examine what scale of those implemented within the BRI inevitably the initiative is in essence and what has compelled China to propose it. become part of existing local and cross-border security II. What is the Belt and Road Initiative? dynamics. They may also expose, and sometimes The BRI has evolved into an organizing principle of the foreign policy of exacerbate, local institutional President Xi Jinping’s administration.1 The BRI, which consists of the ter- weaknesses. Examples of these restrial Silk Road Economic Belt (hereafter the ‘Belt’) and the sea-based 21st issues are found in the three Century Maritime Silk Road (hereafter the ‘Road’), is an ambitious multi- countries studied here: Belarus, decade integration and cooperation vision.
    [Show full text]
  • BCIM Economic Corridor Facilitating Sub-Regional Development
    BCIM Economic Corridor Facilitating Sub-Regional Development IPCS Special Report #187 May 2017 By Roshan Iyer Research Assistant, CUTS International, & former Research Intern, IPCS 18 LINK ROAD, JUNGPURA EXTENSION, NEW DELHI 110014 [email protected]|WWW.IPCS. ORG | +91-11-41001902 BCIM ECONOMIC CORRIDOR: FACILITATING SUB-REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT Roshan Iyer IPCS Special Report #187 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my colleagues from the Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS), who assisted the research for this paper and followed it up till its publication. I am grateful to Dr D Suba Chandran for providing his support in the early stages of my work, which was crucial in allowing me to pursue my research. I would like to thank Dr Mirza Zulfiqar Rahman, Dr Indra Nath Mukherjee and Dr K Yhome for providing me with detailed comments on earlier drafts of the paper. I would also like to thank Dr Harsh V Pant, Dr Rahul Mishra, Dr Amita Batra, Dr Ravi Bhoothalingam, Commodore (Retd) C Uday Bhaskar, and Mr P P Shrivastav for their insights. I am also extremely grateful to Ambassador (Retd) Rajiv Bhatia and Ambassador (Retd) Ranjit Gupta, the final reviewers of this paper, for sharing their valuable inputs and feedback arising from their vast expertise on the workings and dynamics of Asian diplomacy and economic cooperation. Any errors are my own. Finally, it is relevant to mention that the research for this Special Report was completed before the third meeting of the Joint Study Group that took place in April 2017. CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 3 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK ON ECONOMIC CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT 6 BCIM’S STATUS 7 THE BCIM ECONOMIC CORRIDOR TRADE ROUTE 8 CURRENT INTRA-BCIM TRADE 10 ADDRESSING THE ISSUES IN THE EXISTING BCIM FRAMEWORK 12 REFRAMING THE BCIM FORUM 14 POTENTIAL WAYS TO EFFECT "ZONE 2" DEVELOPMENT 17 INTEGRATION OF PORTS AND TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE 20 GRADUAL LIBERALISATION 21 CONCLUSION 22 BIBLIOGRAPHY 18 LINK ROAD, JUNGPURA EXTENSION, NEW DELHI 110014 [email protected]|WWW.IPCS.
    [Show full text]
  • China's Expanding Overseas Coal Power Industry
    Department of War Studies strategy paper 11 paper strategy China’s Expanding Overseas Coal Power Industry: New Strategic Opportunities, Commercial Risks, Climate Challenges and Geopolitical Implications Dr Frank Umbach & Dr Ka-ho Yu 2 China’s Expanding Overseas Coal Power Industry EUCERS Advisory Board Marco Arcelli Executive Vice President, Upstream Gas, Frederick Kempe President and CEO, Atlantic Council, Enel, Rome Washington, D.C., USA Professor Dr Hüseyin Bagci Department Chair of International Ilya Kochevrin Executive Director of Gazprom Export Ltd. Relations, Middle East Technical University Inonu Bulvari, Thierry de Montbrial Founder and President of the Institute Ankara Français des Relations Internationales (IFRI), Paris Andrew Bartlett Managing Director, Bartlett Energy Advisers Chris Mottershead Vice Principal, King’s College London Volker Beckers Chairman, Spenceram Limited Dr Pierre Noël Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah Senior Fellow for Professor Dr Marc Oliver Bettzüge Chair of Energy Economics, Economic and Energy Security, IISS Asia Department of Economics and Director of the Institute of Dr Ligia Noronha Director Resources, Regulation and Global Energy Economics (EWI), University of Cologne Security, TERI, New Delhi Professor Dr Iulian Chifu Advisor to the Romanian President Janusz Reiter Center for International Relations, Warsaw for Strategic Affairs, Security and Foreign Policy and President of the Center for Conflict Prevention and Early Professor Dr Karl Rose Senior Fellow Scenarios, World Warning, Bucharest Energy Council, Vienna/Londo Dr John Chipman Director International Institute for Professor Dr Burkhard Schwenker Chairman of the Strategic Studies (IISS), London Supervisory Board, Roland Berger Strategy Consultants GmbH, Hamburg Professor Dr Dieter Helm University of Oxford Professor Dr Karl Kaiser Director of the Program on Transatlantic Relations of the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School, Cambridge, USA Media Partners Impressum Design © 2016 EUCERS.
    [Show full text]
  • CPEC and Regional Integration
    Global Regional Review (GRR) URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/grr.2019(IV-IV).03 CPEC and Regional Integration Vol. IV, No. IV (Fall 2019) | Page: 19 ‒ 28 | DOI: 10.31703/grr.2019(IV-IV).03 p- ISSN: 2616-955X | e-ISSN: 2663-7030 | ISSN-L: 2616-955X Sabahat Jaleel* Naureen Talha† Zahir Shah‡ China-Pakistan Economic Corridor is an emerging debate. This project called a ‘game-changer’ for Pakistan-China Abstract and for whole region. The main argument based on the phenomena of economic interdependence established peace and integration in the region. The new world order revolves around economic power rather than nuclear power. The economic strength is playing a significant role in regional integration and peace. The CPEC project based on both economic and strategic aspects. This project deals the growing economic interdependence and the phenomena of power politics in South Asia. The CPEC is important part of China’s Marshall plan OBOR and providing a win-win situation for all states of region. This study contributes that how growing economic interdependence through CPEC established peace and integration for whole region. This study based on field survey and discourse analysis. Key Words: Regional Integration, Economic Corridor, Power Politics, OBOR Introduction In 2013, China announced to the world its dream of reviving the Great Silk Route which was once the only known trading route in the world and was especially known for trading goods during the times of ancient Chinese empire(Gorshkov & Bagaturia, 2001). The dream is to revive the Silk Route by implementing massive infrastructure and adding new ports around ancient Silk Route.
    [Show full text]
  • India's Approach to China's Belt and Road Initiative—Opportunities And
    The Chinese Journal of Global Governance 5 (2019) 136–152 brill.com/cjgg India’s Approach to China’s Belt and Road Initiative—Opportunities and Concerns Mala Sharma School of Law, University of Surrey, The United Kingdom [email protected] Abstract China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) as a geoeconomic vision and geopolitical strategy is closely watched and scrutinised by Indian economists, diplomats, and strategists. Perspectives on India’s approach to the BRI can broadly be classified into three—the optimist, the sceptic and the cautionary. Whereas, economists generally appear optimistic, there is a sense of uneasiness within India’s strategic community that the BRI represents much more than China’s ambition to emerge as an economic leader in the region. This article argues that India’s approach to the BRI has largely been pragmatic, cautious and complex. Accordingly, India has taken an atomistic approach to the various components of the BRI depending on its security and economic needs, which explains why on the one hand India has become increasingly receptive of the Bangladesh-China-India-Myanmar Economic Corridor (BCIM EC) and on the other continues to publicly oppose the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). Keywords Belt and Road Initiative – India – bilateral cooperation – pragmatism – China-Pakistan Economic Corridor – Bangladesh-China-India-Myanmar Economic Corridor – Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank – Maritime Silk Road © Mala Sharma, 2019 | doi:10.1163/23525207-12340041 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NCDownloaded 4.0 License. from Brill.com09/28/2021 01:35:46PM via free access India’s Approach to China’s Belt and Road Initiative 137 1 Introduction The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is often described as a mega construction project comprising roads, ports and bridges, and as a grand connectivity plan integrating physical territory, cyberspace and financial arena covering several countries with China at its heart.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Economic Impacts of Connectivity Corridors
    orridor-based infrastructure development promotes economic growth and regional development through reduction in Ctime and cost of the transportation; creates employment Assessing Economic Impacts of Connectivity Corridors: opportunities due to higher transportation activities, and contributes Assessing Economic to poverty reduction. India’s several infrastructure development initiatives are aimed to provide cost effective and efficient logistic Impacts of Connectivity services. In particular, India’s Northeastern Region (NER) aims to deepen connectivity with national and cross-border corridors. NER is crucial to India’s growing economic and strategic partnership with Corridors: Southeast and East Asia. NER acts as a land-bridge between India and Southeast Asia. Owing to its strategic location, development of An Empirical Investigation transport corridors, which connect the NER with rest of India and the neighbouring countries, has the potential to grow faster and can boost trade and connectivity with Southeast and East Asian countries. This study has examined the developmental impact of existing East- Prabir De West Corridor (EWC) and the proposed cross-border corridors such as Trilateral Highway (TH), Kaladan multi-modal transit transport Sunetra Ghatak corrdior, and Bangladesh–China–India–Myanmar Economic Durairaj Kumarasamy Corridor (BCIM-EC) on the Indian states with particular focus on the NER states based on economic geography model. The study finds that corridor-based development projects may generate economic activities and regional development, which, in turn, would influence economic growth through higher production and consumption. The study has important policy implications in promoting economic activities and regional development. About the Authors An Empirical Investigation Dr. Prabir De, Professor, Research and Information System for Developing Countries (RIS), and Coordinator, ASEAN-India Centre (AIC) at RIS, New Delhi Dr.
    [Show full text]