DOCSLIB.ORG

Relationship Chart Gordon Henry Kraft:GOD Almighty

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Relationship Chart Gordon Henry Kraft:GOD Almighty Yahweh Jehovah Jahveh Azna Goddess GOD Almighty GOD Birth Birth Heaven, The Spririt World Birth Heaven, The Spririt World Death Hessen, Germany Death Dies, Westerwaldkreis, Rheinland- Death Never, Amur, Russia Pfalz, Germany Hessen, Germany Eve All Mankind Birth 5 Jun 1909 Adam First Patriarch Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, Birth United States Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, Marriage United States Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, Death United States Olaha, Shinehah Death 24 Aug 2003 Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, United States Azura bint Adam Seth ben Adam Second Birth Patriarch Olaha, Shinehah Birth 1903 Marriage Olaha, Shinehah Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, Death 1042 United States Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, Death United States Canaan, Litchfield, Connecticut, United States Enos ben Seth Third Noam bint Seth Patriarch Birth Birth Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, United States United States Marriage 1879 Death Death Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, United States United States Rashujal Barakiel ben Enos Birth Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, Birth United States Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, Marriage United States Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, Death 1235 United States Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, Death United States Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, United States Mahalalel ben Cainan Dinah Sina bint Barakiel Birth Birth British Columbia, Canada Eden, Lamoille, Vermont, United States Marriage Adam, Harper, Oklahoma, United Death 1933 States Adam, Harper, Oklahoma, United States Death 1290 British Columbia, Canada Baraka Bint Rashujal Jared Yared Ben Mahalalel Birth Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, Birth 1460 United States Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, Marriage United States Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, Death 1422 United States Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, Death United States Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, United States Edni Bint Daniel Birth Enoch Ben Jared Elba, Genesee, New York, United Birth 22 Jan 1888 States Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, Marriage United States Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, Death 1052 United States Bayern, Germany Death Elba, Genesee, New York, United States EDNA bint AZRAIL Methuselah Ben Enoch Birth Canaan, Litchfield, Connecticut, Birth 1656 United States Zion, Lake, Illinois, United States Marriage Death 1656 Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, United States United States Death Zion, Lake, Illinois, United States Bilanos Betenos Ashmuh Adah bint Barakil Lamech Ben Methuselah Birth 1210 Birth 2000 Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, United States United States Marriage Death 1651 Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, United States United States Death 1933 Zhvanets, Podolia Emzarah Naamah Bas Rakeel Noah Ben Lamech Birth 1190 Birth 1056 Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, United States United States Marriage Death 1998 Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, United States United States Death 1930 Salem, Tamil Nadu, India Sedeqetelebab Ollo Bc Shem Birth Birth 1957 British Columbia, Canada Adam, Harper, Oklahoma, United Marriage States Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, Death 1957 United States Salem, Yerushalayim, Israel Death British Columbia, Canada Rasu Eja Rasu Eja Kesed Ben Arphaxad Birth British Columbia, Canada Birth 1656 Salem, Tamil Nadu, India Marriage Ur, Pyrenees-Orientales, Death 1878 Languedoc-Roussillon, France Salem, British Columbia, Canada Death British Columbia, Canada Muak Mu Ak Shelah Salah Birth Birth 1694 Canaan, Litchfield, Connecticut, Palestine, Israel United States Death 1989 Death 1852 Age, Cuanza Sul, Angola Canaan, Litchfield, Connecticut, United States Eber Heber Azurad Nebrod Birth 1724 Birth Israel British Columbia, Canada Death 1813 Death Israel British Columbia, Canada Peleg falikh DeBabylon Lamna DeShinar Birth 1757 Birth Palestine, Bradford, Florida, United Canaan, Litchfield, Connecticut, States United States Death 1996 Death Palestine, Bradford, Florida, United British Columbia, Canada States Reu Hebrew Ora Birth 1887 Birth British Columbia, Canada British Columbia, Canada Death 2004 Death 2004 British Columbia, Canada British Columbia, Canada MELKA Bint Kaber Birth NAHOR Ben Serug Ur, Pyrenees-Orientales, Birth 1821 Languedoc-Roussillon, France British Columbia, Canada Marriage Death 1951 Ur, Pyrenees-Orientales, British Columbia, Canada Languedoc-Roussillon, France Death 1890 Aram, Paktia, Afghanistan Ijosek Chaldeans Nabor Nahur Birth 1988 Ur, Pyrenees-Orientales, Birth 1819 Languedoc-Roussillon, France Ur, Pyrenees-Orientales, Marriage Languedoc-Roussillon, France Ur, Pyrenees-Orientales, Death 1999 Languedoc-Roussillon, France Ur, Pyrenees-Orientales, Death 1970 Languedoc-Roussillon, France Ur, Pyrenees-Orientales, Languedoc-Roussillon, France Amthelo Agade Terah Thara Birth 1970 Ur, Dhi Qar, Iraq Birth 1917 Marriage Ur, Dhi Qar, Iraq Ur, Pyrenees-Orientales, Death 1878 Languedoc-Roussillon, France British Columbia, Canada Death 1945 Ur, Dhi Qar, Iraq Abraham Abram Terah Bint Terah Sarai Birth 1810 Birth 1950 Ur, Pyrenees-Orientales, Ur, Pyrenees-Orientales, Languedoc-Roussillon, France Languedoc-Roussillon, France Death 1919 Death 1847 Land of Canaan, Demerara- Palestine, Israel Mahaica, Guyana Rebekah Bint Bethuel Isaac Ben Abraham Birth 1912 Birth 1716 Aram, Paktia, Afghanistan Aram, Paktia, Afghanistan Marriage Death 1742 Haran, Padan, Egypt Beersheba, Canaan, Israel Death 1720 Beersheba, Canaan, Israel Leah Bint Laban Jacob Ibn Isaac Birth 1829 Birth 1652 Aram, Paktia, Afghanistan Aram, Paktia, Afghanistan Marriage Death 1505 Aram, Paktia, Afghanistan Rameses, Goshen, Egypt Death 1745 Israel Judah Ben Israel Tamar Israel Birth 1505 Birth 1765 Palestine, Israel Israel Death 1370 Death 1300 Rameses, Goshen, Egypt Rameses, Goshen, Egypt Electra One Pleiades Zarah Ben Judah Birth Birth 1437 Israel Israel Marriage 1715 Death 1638 Rameses, Goshen, Egypt Rameses, Goshen, Egypt Death 1414 England Dardanus Dardania Basia Asia Birth 1414 Birth Rameses, Goshen, Egypt Minor, Yakutia, Russia Death 1320 Death Rameses, Goshen, Egypt British Columbia, Canada Astyoche Ilium Erichthonius Acadia Birth 1397 Birth 1347 BC, Arkadia, Greece Minor, Yakutia, Russia Marriage Death 1368 New Brunswick, Canada Kosovo, Grodno, Belarus Death 1328 Tros Troy Callirhoe Ilium Birth 1314 Birth 1378 Troy, Oakland, Michigan, United Crete, Greece States Death Death 1328 British Columbia, Canada Minor, Yakutia, Russia Eurydice Troy Ilus Troy Birth 1350 Birth 1379 Asia, Ghowr, Afghanistan British Columbia, Canada Marriage Death 1279 Troy, Turkey Bc Dardania, Troad, Phrygia Death Troy Placia Strymo Troy Laomedon Troy Birth 1290 Birth 1150 Minor, Yakutia, Russia Troy Marriage Death 1235 Troy, Turkey Troy Death 1200 Minor, Yakutia, Russia Priam Troy Hecuba Phrygia Birth 1264 Birth 1225 Minor, Yakutia, Russia Minor, Yakutia, Russia Death 1183 Marriage 1241 Greese, Nordwestmecklenburg, Troy, Turkey Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Death 1183 Germany Minor, Yakutia, Russia Helenus Troy Andromache Epirus Birth 1225 Birth Troy, Turkey Epirus, Greece Death 1149 Death Troy, Greece Epirus, Greece Genger Scythians Birth 1149 Scythia, now near Ryzanovka, Ukraine Death 1149 Troy, Greece Francus Scythians Scythians Birth 1190 Scythia, now, Ukraine Death 1090 Troy, Greece Esdron Troy Birth 1137 Troy, Greece MAMMON TROY Death 1000 TROY, TURKEY Gelio Troy Birth 1000 Ancient Troy, Greece end Death 1000 Ancient Troy, Greece Basabeliano Basabelian Troy Birth 1130 Troy, Oakland, Michigan, United end States Death 1000 Troy, Greece Plesron I Troy Birth 1100 Troy, Phrygia end Death 1050 Troy, Troad, Phrygia Eliacor Troy Birth 1085 Troad, Phrygia, Asia Minor now, Turkey Death 1040 Macedonia Gaberiano Zaberian Troy Callirhot Illium Birth 1000 Birth 1345 Minor, Yakutia, Russia Minor, Yakutia, Russia Death 1300 Death Troy, Oakland, Michigan, United Ancient Troy, Greece States Plaserius Troy Eurydice Illium Troy Birth 1340 Birth 1345 Dardania, Phrygia, Turkey Dardania, Phrygia, Turkey Death 1310 Death 1279 Dardania, Phrygia, Turkey Dardania, Phrygia, Turkey antenor Troy Birth 1315 Troy, Troad, Phrygia Death 1235 Troy, Troad, Phrygia Priam ll Troy Birth 1250 Turkey Death 1183 Turkey Helenos ll Troy Birth Turkey Death Turkey Plesron ll Troy Birth Turkey Death Turkey Basabelian ll Troy Birth Turkey Death Turkey Alexandre Alexandro Trojan Troy Birth Troad, Phrygia, Asia Minor now, Turkey Death British Columbia, Canada Priam Cimmerians Cimmerians Birth Troad, Phrygia, Asia Minor now, Turkey Death Troad, Phrygia, Asia Minor now, Turkey Gentilanor Cimmerians Cimmerians Birth Troad, Phrygia, Asia Minor now, Turkey Death Troad, Phrygia, Asia Minor now, Turkey Almadion Alamadius Troy Cimmerians Birth Troad, Phrygia, Asia Minor now, Turkey Death Troad, Phrygia, Asia Minor now, Turkey Diluglio Cimmeria Cimmerians Antenor I Euxim Cimmeri Birth Troad, Phrygia, Asia Minor now, Turkey Death Troad, Phrygia, Asia Minor now, Turkey MARCOMIR I TROY SCYTHIA CIMMERIANS Cimmerians SICAMBRI Birth Birth Gaul, France British Columbia, Canada Death Death Gaul, France 400 BC Troy, Turkey, Greece Antenor Cimmerians Cambra VanFriesland Birth Birth Gaul, Rajshahi, Bangladesh Descendants, Called, Sicambri Death Death Gaul, Rajshahi, Bangladesh Gaul, Rajshahi, Bangladesh Priamus Priam Sicambri Birth Gaul, Rajshahi, Bangladesh Priamus Sicambri Death Gaul, Rajshahi, Bangladesh Helenus Sicambri
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Performing Death in Tyre: the Life and Afterlife of a Roman Cemetery in the Province of Syria
    University of Groningen Performing Death in Tyre de Jong, Lidewijde Published in: American Journal of Archaeology DOI: 10.3764/aja.114.4.597 IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2010 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): de Jong, L. (2010). Performing Death in Tyre: The Life and Afterlife of a Roman Cemetery in the Province of Syria. American Journal of Archaeology, 114(4), 597-630. https://doi.org/10.3764/aja.114.4.597 Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.
    [Show full text]
  • Separating Fact from Fiction in the Aiolian Migration
    hesperia yy (2008) SEPARATING FACT Pages399-430 FROM FICTION IN THE AIOLIAN MIGRATION ABSTRACT Iron Age settlementsin the northeastAegean are usuallyattributed to Aioliancolonists who journeyed across the Aegean from mainland Greece. This articlereviews the literary accounts of the migration and presentsthe relevantarchaeological evidence, with a focuson newmaterial from Troy. No onearea played a dominantrole in colonizing Aiolis, nor is sucha widespread colonizationsupported by the archaeologicalrecord. But the aggressive promotionof migrationaccounts after the PersianWars provedmutually beneficialto bothsides of theAegean and justified the composition of the Delian League. Scholarlyassessments of habitation in thenortheast Aegean during the EarlyIron Age are remarkably consistent: most settlements are attributed toAiolian colonists who had journeyed across the Aegean from Thessaly, Boiotia,Akhaia, or a combinationof all three.1There is no uniformityin theancient sources that deal with the migration, although Orestes and his descendantsare named as theleaders in mostaccounts, and are credited withfounding colonies over a broadgeographic area, including Lesbos, Tenedos,the western and southerncoasts of theTroad, and theregion betweenthe bays of Adramyttion and Smyrna(Fig. 1). In otherwords, mainlandGreece has repeatedly been viewed as theagent responsible for 1. TroyIV, pp. 147-148,248-249; appendixgradually developed into a Mountjoy,Holt Parker,Gabe Pizzorno, Berard1959; Cook 1962,pp. 25-29; magisterialstudy that is includedhere Allison Sterrett,John Wallrodt, Mal- 1973,pp. 360-363;Vanschoonwinkel as a companionarticle (Parker 2008). colm Wiener, and the anonymous 1991,pp. 405-421; Tenger 1999, It is our hope that readersinterested in reviewersfor Hesperia. Most of trie pp. 121-126;Boardman 1999, pp. 23- the Aiolian migrationwill read both articlewas writtenin the Burnham 33; Fisher2000, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Ptolemaic Foundations in Asia Minor and the Aegean As the Lagids’ Political Tool
    ELECTRUM * Vol. 20 (2013): 57–76 doi: 10.4467/20800909EL.13.004.1433 PTOLEMAIC FOUNDATIONS IN ASIA MINOR AND THE AEGEAN AS THE LAGIDS’ POLITICAL TOOL Tomasz Grabowski Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Kraków Abstract: The Ptolemaic colonisation in Asia Minor and the Aegean region was a signifi cant tool which served the politics of the dynasty that actively participated in the fi ght for hegemony over the eastern part of the Mediterranean Sea basin. In order to specify the role which the settlements founded by the Lagids played in their politics, it is of considerable importance to establish as precise dating of the foundations as possible. It seems legitimate to acknowledge that Ptolemy II possessed a well-thought-out plan, which, apart from the purely strategic aspects of founding new settlements, was also heavily charged with the propaganda issues which were connected with the cult of Arsinoe II. Key words: Ptolemies, foundations, Asia Minor, Aegean. Settlement of new cities was a signifi cant tool used by the Hellenistic kings to achieve various goals: political and economic. The process of colonisation was begun by Alex- ander the Great, who settled several cities which were named Alexandrias after him. The process was successfully continued by the diadochs, and subsequently by the follow- ing rulers of the monarchies which emerged after the demise of Alexander’s state. The new settlements were established not only by the representatives of the most powerful dynasties: the Seleucids, the Ptolemies and the Antigonids, but also by the rulers of the smaller states. The kings of Pergamum of the Attalid dynasty were considerably active in this fi eld, but the rulers of Bithynia, Pontus and Cappadocia were also successful in this process.1 Very few regions of the time remained beyond the colonisation activity of the Hellenistic kings.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Background
    Cultural Background Funerary Patterns in Lebanon—From the Bronze Age to the Roman Period By Signe Krag 2 Hellenistic Cities in the Levant By Eva Mortensen 8 Hellenistic and Roman Sarcophagi in the Levant By Philip Ebeling 12 Maron and the Maronites By Niels Bargfeldt 19 1 Agora nr. 8 2011 Funerary Patterns in Lebanon—From the Bronze Age to the Roman Period By Signe Krag During the Bronze Age inhumation burials were the Photo: Signe Krag common practice in Lebanon. The evidence is very limited, but it suggests that several types of burials were used at the same time, namely jar burials (with inhumed infants and small children), rock-cut tombs, pit graves, cist graves and hypogea with chambers and possible sarcophagi. The burial gifts seem to have been placed in the graves according to the sex of the deceased, as men are often buried with weapons and women are buried with domes- tic objects and jewellery. Furthermore, luxury items are placed in some of the graves, a fact which sug- gests the existence of a society with marked social differences. At Sidon we find evidence for the prac- tice of animal sacrifice, and ovens that are placed at Fig. 1: The sarcophagus of Ahiram depicting mourning women. the graves suggest a belief in the afterlife of the deceased. On the sarcophagus of Ahiram from Byblos are depictions of mourning women which could tell us how the deceased was mourned. The evidence comes mainly from Beirut, Sidon and Byblos. During the Iron Age both inhumation and cremation burials were in use.
    [Show full text]
  • Synoikism, Urbanization, and Empire in the Early Hellenistic Period Ryan
    Synoikism, Urbanization, and Empire in the Early Hellenistic Period by Ryan Anthony Boehm A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ancient History and Mediterranean Archaeology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Emily Mackil, Chair Professor Erich Gruen Professor Mark Griffith Spring 2011 Copyright © Ryan Anthony Boehm, 2011 ABSTRACT SYNOIKISM, URBANIZATION, AND EMPIRE IN THE EARLY HELLENISTIC PERIOD by Ryan Anthony Boehm Doctor of Philosophy in Ancient History and Mediterranean Archaeology University of California, Berkeley Professor Emily Mackil, Chair This dissertation, entitled “Synoikism, Urbanization, and Empire in the Early Hellenistic Period,” seeks to present a new approach to understanding the dynamic interaction between imperial powers and cities following the Macedonian conquest of Greece and Asia Minor. Rather than constructing a political narrative of the period, I focus on the role of reshaping urban centers and regional landscapes in the creation of empire in Greece and western Asia Minor. This period was marked by the rapid creation of new cities, major settlement and demographic shifts, and the reorganization, consolidation, or destruction of existing settlements and the urbanization of previously under- exploited regions. I analyze the complexities of this phenomenon across four frameworks: shifting settlement patterns, the regional and royal economy, civic religion, and the articulation of a new order in architectural and urban space. The introduction poses the central problem of the interrelationship between urbanization and imperial control and sets out the methodology of my dissertation. After briefly reviewing and critiquing previous approaches to this topic, which have focused mainly on creating catalogues, I point to the gains that can be made by shifting the focus to social and economic structures and asking more specific interpretive questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Aus: Zeitschrift Für Papyrologie Und Epigraphik 73 (1988) 15–18 © Dr. Rudolf Habelt Gmbh, Bonn
    EDITH HALL WHEN DID THE TROJANS TURN INTO PHRYGIANS? ALCAEUS 42.15 aus: Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 73 (1988) 15–18 © Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH, Bonn 15 WHEN DID THE TROJANS TURN INTO PHRYGIANS? ALCAEUS 42.15 The Greek tragedians reformulated the myths inherited from the epic cycle in the light of the distinctively 5th-century antithesis between Hellene and barbarian. But in the case of the Trojans the most significant step in the process of their "barbarisation" was their acquisition of a new name, "Phryg- ians".1) In the Iliad, of course, the Phrygians are important allies of Troy, but geographically and politically distinct from them (B 862-3, G 184-90, K 431, P 719). The force of the distinction is made even plainer by the composer of the Homeric Hymn to Aphrodite, which may date from as early as the 7th century,2) where the poet introduces as an example of the goddess's power the story of her seduction of Anchises. She came to him in his Trojan home, pre- tending to be a mortal, daugter of famous Otreus, the ruler of all Phrygia (111-112). But then she immediately explained why they could converse with- out any problem (113-116); I know both your language and my own well, for a Trojan nurse brought me up in my palace: she took me from my dear mother and reared me when I was a little child. And that is why I also know your language well. So the Trojans and Phrygians are quite distinct, politically, geographically, and linguistically.
    [Show full text]
  • What Happened to the Galatian Christians? Paul's Legacy in Southern Galatia
    Acta Theologica 2014 Suppl 19: 1-17 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/actat.v33i2S.1 ISSN 1015-8758 © UV/UFS <http://www.ufs.ac.za/ActaTheologica> Cilliers Breytenbach WHAT HAPPENED TO THE GALATIAN CHRISTIANS? PAUL’S LEGACY IN SOUTHERN GALATIA ABSTRACT Paul’s Letter to the Galatians points to the influence of his missionary attempts in Galatia. By reconstructing the missionary journeys of Paul and his company in Asia Minor the author argues once again for the south Galatian hypothesis, according to which the apostle travelled through the south of the province of Galatia, i.e. southern Pisidia and Lycaonia, and never entered the region of Galatia proper in the north of the province. Supporting material comes from the epigraphic evidence of the apostle’s name in the first four centuries. Nowhere else in the world of early Christianity the name Παῦλος was used with such a high frequency as in those regions where the apostle founded the first congregations in the south of the province Galatia and in the Phrygian-Galatian borderland. 1. INTRODUCTION Even though Barnabas and Paul were sent by the church of Antioch on the Orontes to the province Syria-Cilicia to spread the gospel on Cyprus and they then went to Asia Minor,1 it was only Paul who revisited Lycaonia (cf. Acts 16:1-5; 18:23). The epigraphical material referred to here, will illustrate that more than anyone else, Paul left his mark on Lycaonian Christianity.2 From the scant evidence available, it is clear that the Pauline letters and 1 Cf.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geography of Paul's Apostolic Journey
    THE GEOGRAPHY OF PAUL’S APOSTOLIC JOURNEY Myrtle Baptist Church 21 Curve Street, West Newton, MA 02465 Telephone: (617) 332-5870 Visit us online at: www.myrtlebaptist.org Like us on Facebook: www.facebook.com/myrtlebaptist Follow us on Twitter: @myrtlebaptist Opportunities for Participation in This Series ADULT SUNDAY SCHOOL CLASS 9:30am at Myrtle Baptist Church SUNDAY MORNING WORSHIP ENCOUNTER SERMONIC MOMENT 10:45am at Myrtle Baptist Church WEDNESDAY NIGHT BIBLE STUDY 8:00pm on Facebook Live and Conference Call Please subscribe to the Myrtle Baptist Church page to find the video or call in to (641) 715 -3680, passcode 458869 to listen to the broadcast. Recommended Resources for Additional Study The following articles will be available electronically and in hard copy (by request) in the church’s administrative office. From Marchal, Joseph. Studying Paul’s Letters: Contemporary Perspectives and Methods. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2012. • Chapter 1 - “Historical Approaches: Whose Past? Whose Present?” by Melanie Johnson-Debaufre • Chapter 7 - “Jewish Perspectives: A Jewish Apostle to the Gentiles” by Pamela Eisenbaum • Chapter 8 - “African American Approaches: Rehumanizing the Reader against Racism and Reading through Experience” by Demetrius Williams • Chapter 10 - “Postcolonial Approaches: Negotiating Empires, Then and Now” By Jeremy Punt The following books and resources are accessible and carefully selecte. They are widely available through major book distributors and some local libraries for interested individuals. • Brondos, David. Paul on the Cross: Reconstructing the Apostle’s Story of Redemption.Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2006. • Marchal, Joseph. Studying Paul’s Letters: Contemporary Perspectives and Methods. Minneapolis: Fortress • Press, 2012. • Nanos, Mark.The Irony of Galatians: Paul’s Letter in First-century Context.
    [Show full text]
  • Relationship Chart Barbli:Creator
    Creator God Death Omnipotent, Omnipresent, Infinite First Man ADAM First Lady EVE Birth 2000 Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, Birth 1642 United States Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, United States Marriage Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, Death 1642 United States Hebron, Tolland, Connecticut, United States Death Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, United States Azura Bint Adam Seth Ben Adam Birth 2000 Birth 1000 Olaha, Shinehah Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, Marriage United States Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, Death 1043 United States Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, Death 2000 United States Canaan, Litchfield, Connecticut, United States NOAM bint SETH ENOSH ben SETH Birth 7 Dec 1809 Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, Birth 1880 United States Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, Marriage United States Adam, Harper, Oklahoma, United Death 1140 States Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, Death 28 Feb 1835 United States Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, United States Mualeleth bint Enosh Cainan Kenon Ben Enosh Birth Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, Birth United States Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, Marriage United States Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, Death 1235 United States Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, Death United States Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, United States Rashujal Ben Cainan Baraka bat Rasujal Birth 1903 Birth Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, United States United States Death 1042 Death Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, Eden, Rockingham, North Carolina, United States United
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution of Troad Granite Columns As Evidence for Reconstructing the Management of Their Production Patrizio Pensabene, Javier Á
    ASMOSIA PROCEEDINGS: ASMOSIA I, N. HERZ, M. WAELKENS (eds.): Classical Marble: Geochemistry, Technology, Trade, Dordrecht/Boston/London,1988. e n ASMOSIA II, M. WAELKENS, N. HERZ, L. MOENS (eds.): o t Ancient Stones: Quarrying, Trade and Provenance – S Interdisciplinary Studies on Stones and Stone Technology in t Europe and Near East from the Prehistoric to the Early n Christian Period, Leuven 1992. e i ASMOSIA III, Y. MANIATIS, N. HERZ, Y. BASIAKOS (eds.): c The Study of Marble and Other Stones Used in Antiquity, n London 1995. A ASMOSIA IV, M. SCHVOERER (ed.): Archéomatéiaux – n Marbres et Autres Roches. Actes de la IVème Conférence o Internationale de l’Association pour l’Étude des Marbres et s Autres Roches Utilisés dans le Passé, Bordeaux-Talence 1999. e i d ASMOSIA V, J. HERRMANN, N. HERZ, R. NEWMAN (eds.): u ASMOSIA 5, Interdisciplinary Studies on Ancient Stone – t Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of the S Association for the Study of Marble and Other Stones in y Antiquity, Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, June 1998, London r 2002. a n ASMOSIA VI, L. LAZZARINI (ed.): Interdisciplinary Studies i on Ancient Stone – ASMOSIA VI, Proceedings of the Sixth l p International Conference of the Association for the Study of i Marble and Other Stones in Antiquity, Padova 2002. c s i ASMOSIA VII, Y. MANIATIS (ed.): Actes du VIIe colloque in- d ternational de l’ASMOSIA, Thasos 15-20 septembre 2003, r Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of e ASMOSIA XI Association for the Study of Marble and Other Stones in t n Interdisciplinary Studies on Ancient Stone Antiquity, Thassos 15-20 septembre 2003, BCH supplement I 51, Athènes 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • The Coinage and History of Achaiion in the Troad Aneurin Ellis-Evans
    The Coinage and History of Achaiion in the Troad Aneurin Ellis-Evans To cite this version: Aneurin Ellis-Evans. The Coinage and History of Achaiion in the Troad. Revue des études anciennes, Revue des études anciennes, Université Bordeaux Montaigne, 2017, 119 (1), p 25-47. hal-01947967 HAL Id: hal-01947967 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01947967 Submitted on 23 Sep 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Copyright THE COINAGE AND HISTORY OF ACHAIION IN THE TROAD* Aneurin ELLIS-EVANS** Résumé. – La provenance de deux exemplaires de monnaie de bronze de Troade avec le monogramme AX (fin IVe-début IIIe s. a.C.) a été habituellement attribuée à Achilleion. Cependant, les fouilles menées sur le site d’Achilleion n’ont jamais révélé autre chose qu’un fort. Ces pièces devraient donc être attribuées à Achaion, connu par Strabon comme la cité principale à proximité de la pérée de Ténédos. Outre ces exemplaires, Achaion a aussi frappé un monnayage de bronze au IIe siècle a.C. Ces deux périodes de frappe correspondent probablement à deux moments d’indépendance d’Achaion par rapport à Ténédos, interrogeant du même coup l’importance de la pérée dans l’économie ténédienne et celle du monnayage de bronze dans la reconstruction de l’histoire politique de la Troade hellénistique.
    [Show full text]
  • III. Roman Macedonia (168 BC - AD 284)
    III. Roman Macedonia (168 BC - AD 284) by Pandelis Nigdelis 1. Political and administrative developments 1.1. Macedonia as a Roman protectorate (168–148 BC) A few months after defeating Perseus, the last king of Macedonia, at Pydna (168 BC) the Romans found themselves facing the crucial question of how to govern the country. The question was not a new one. It had arisen thirty years before, after their victory over Perseus’ father, Philip V, at Cynoscephalae (197 BC), when the solution adopted was to preserve the kingdom within its old historical boundaries and to have the heir to the throne, Demetrius, educated in Rome, so that Macedonia would continue to fulfil its vital role as a rampart defending southern Greece against barbarian invasion. The latest war had shown that this solution was unrealistic, and that harsher measures were re- quired for more effective control over the land. The Romans still, however, avoided becoming directly involved in the government of the country, for they did not want to assume responsibility for its defence. They therefore, having set the amount of the an- nual taxation at 100 talents, or half its previous level (an unavoidable reduction given that they were abolishing some of the revenues enjoyed by the previous regime), and collected spoils and plunder worth a total of 6000 talents, opted for the solution of a Macedonia politically divided and economically enfeebled. The political fragmentation of Macedonia was achieved primarily by the creation of four self-governing “cantons” (regiones); these, with the exception of Paeonia (which, although inhabited by a single tribe, was divided under the new system), were defined on the basis of their historical boundaries.
    [Show full text]