DOCSLIB.ORG

A Unique Collection of Siberian Eskimo Texts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Unique Collection of Siberian Eskimo Texts International Journal of Eurasian Linguistics 2 (2020) 159–180 JEAL brill.com/jeal Book Reviews ∵ Half a Century After: a Unique Collection of Siberian Eskimo Texts Nikolai B. Vakhtin [Н. Б. Вахтин] (ed.). Тексты на языках эскимосов Чукотки в записи Е. С. Рубцовой [Texts in the languages of the Eskimos of Chukotka collected by E. S. Rubtsova]. Sankt-Peterburg: Art-Ekspress, 2019. 868 pp. ISBN 978-5-4391-0543-4. This book makes available 65 texts in two Eskimo languages, spoken on Chukotka Peninsula in the extreme North-East of Russia. The texts were col- lected on the spot by Ekaterina S. Rubtsova in 1940–1943 and were prepared for publication by Nikolai B. Vakhtin. This is the second publication in which Vakhtin deals with Rubtsova’s textual materials. The previous volume (Vakhtin 2000) contains texts in Sireniki Eskimo (sirenikskii), collected by several Russian scholars, including, apart from Rubtsova, also Georgii Menovshchikov, Nina Emelianova and Vakhtin himself, and dating from the 1940s to the 1990s. The current publication includes texts in two other Eskimo languages, namely Naukan Yupik (naukanskii) and Chaplino Yupik (chaplinskii). The value of this volume is hard to overestimate, since it contains unique data, collected during times when these languages were not yet affected by the influence of Russian and were not endangered. Most texts in the collection are narratives, but there are also several songs of various genres. The material is presented in a clear manner in the original transcription, accompanied by an underlying Russian translation of each sentence, and with comments in the footnotes. A full analysis with morphological glosses is offered for only one text in the end of the volume. This gives the reader an opportunity to imagine what an “ideal” representation of Eskimo texts could look like. The information on Rubtsova’s consultants is given in footnotes to each text and is discussed in © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2020 | doi:10.1163/25898833-12340028 160 book reviews detail in the final part of the book, written by Igor Krupnik. The database of the Asiatic Eskimos born in 1850–1941, a result of several decades of work done by Krupnik, made it possible not only to identify 25 of the 27 consultants rep- resented in the volume, but also to trace their age, clan affiliation, occupation, place(s) of residence, and dialectal base. All this information is essential for understanding the language variation that is attested in Rubtsova’s texts. In my view, one of the shortcomings of the book is the lack of information on the relevant languages and their varieties, as well as on the general context in which they used to be spoken. In the following I will try to fill this gap by presenting some basic information on the topic. As we know, the Eskimo-Aleut (Eskaleutic) language family is divided into two branches: the Eskimo lan- guages and the Aleut languages. The latter were historically spoken in two varieties on the extremity of the Alaska Peninsula and on the Aleutian Archipelago. The Eskimo languages are further classified into the Inuit and Yupik branches. The Inuit languages form a continuum of varieties spoken in Greenland, Canada, and northern Alaska, and in the past they were also represented on the Asiatic side by the Imaklik language. Until 1948, Imaklik was spoken by around 100 people on the Imaklik Island, also known as the Big Diomede Island or Ostrov Ratmanova, cf. (Menovshchikov 1980). The Yupik languages are spoken both in southwestern Alaska and in Siberia. (Central) Alaskan Yupik covers the area from the south shore of Norton Sound (an inlet of the Bering Sea), across the deltas of Yukon and Kuskokwim Rivers and Bristol Bay to the north shore of the Alaska Peninsula. Pacific Gulf Yupik (Alutiiq) is spoken from the Alaska Peninsula eastward to Prince William Sound, an inlet of the Gulf of Alaska known in Russian as Chugatskii zaliv. Chaplino Yupik, also known as Central Siberian Yupik, is the most wide- spread Yupik language in Siberia. It used to be spoken in several locations along the coast of the Chukotka Peninsula, as well as on St. Lawrence Island in the Bering Sea. Naukan Yupik, also known as East Cape Yupik, was origi- nally spoken more locally in the area of Cape Dezhnev (East Cape), the easternmost point of Asia. The taxonomic status of the already extinct (Old) Sireniki language, which was used along the south-eastern coast of the Chukotka Peninsula, is still undefined. It is variously classified either as another Yupik language (Menovshchikov 1964) or as a separate third branch of Eskimo languages alongside with Inuit and Yupik (Fortescue et al. 1994). The intelligibility between Chaplino and Naukan Yupik is known to be only partial, whereas between Chaplino Yupik and Sireniki it was very minimal, or totally absent. In general, all Siberian Yupik languages show the influence of Chukchi, with which they have been in close contact (Krauss 1976: 188). Let us now consider in more detail the two languages from which texts are offered in the volume under review. International Journal of Eurasian Linguistics 2 (2020) 159–180.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Eskimo Language Work of Aleksandr Forshtein
    Alaska Journal of Anthropology Volume 4, Numbers 1-2 The Eskimo Language Work of Aleksandr Forshtein Michael E. Krauss Alaska Native Language Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks, AK 99775, ff [email protected] Abstract: Th e paper focuses on another aspect of the legacy of the late Russian Eskimologist Aleksandr Forshtein (1904-1968), namely his linguistic materials and his publications in Eskimo languages and early Russian/Soviet school programs in Siberian Yupik. During the 1930s, the Russians launched an impressive program in developing writing systems, education, and publication in several Native Siberian languages. Forshtein and his mentor, Waldemar Bogoras, took active part in those eff orts on behalf of Siberian Yupik. Th e paper reviews Forshtein’s (and Bogoras’) various contributions to Siberian Yupik language work and language documentation. As it turned out, Forshtein’s, as well as Bogoras’ approach had many fl aws; several colleagues of Forshtein achieved better results and produced alternative writing systems for Siberian Yupik language. Th is review of the early Russian language work on Siberian Yupik is given against the backdrop of many colorful personalities involved and of the general conditions of Russian Siberian linguistics during the 1920s and the 1930s. Keywords: A.S. Forshtein, V.G. Bogoraz, K.S. Sergeeva, E. P. Orlova, Yuit Th is paper that evaluates the Eskimo language work of forced me to compromise a freedom taken for granted on Aleksandr Semenovich Forshtein (1904-1968) must begin this side. with a painfully confl icted apology. In the early 1980’s I was invited by Isabelle Kreindler of Haifa University to contrib- Furthermore, I feel the need to warn the reader to bear ute a paper to a collection on Soviet linguists executed or with me that in the recent process of research for the present interned by Stalinist repression in the former USSR during paper, I was repeatedly faced with new discoveries and re- the years 1930-1953 (Kreindler 1985).
    [Show full text]
  • Council for Innovative Research Peer Review Research Publishing System Journal: Journal of Advances in Linguistics Vol 3, No
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by KHALSA PUBLICATIONS ISSN 2348-3024 Language Contact, Use and Attitudes among the Chaldo-Assyrians of Baghdad, Iraq: A Sociolinguistic Study Bader S. Dweik, Tiba A. Al-Obaidi Middle East University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of English Language and Literature [email protected] Middle East University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of English Language and Literature [email protected] ABSTRACT This study aimed at investigating the language situation among the Chaldo-Assyrians in Baghdad. The study attempted to answer the following questions: In what domains do the Chaldo-Assyrians of Baghdad use Syriac and Arabic? What are their attitudes towards both languages? To achieve the goal of this study, the researchers selected a sample that consisted of (135) Chaldo-Assyrians of different age, gender and educational background. The instruments used in this study were interviews and a questionnaire which comprised two different areas: domains of language use and language attitudes. The researchers concluded that the Chaldo-Assyrians in Baghdad used Syriac in different domains mainly at home, in religious settings and in their inner speech; and used it side by side with Arabic in many other social domains such as neighborhood, place of work, media and other public places. The study revealed that the attitudes of the Chaldo- Assyrians towards Syriac and Arabic were highly positive. Finally, the researchers recommended conducting similar studies on other ethnic groups in Baghdad like Turkumans, Kurds, Armenians and Sabians. Indexing terms/Keywords Language Contact; Use; Attitudes; Chaldo-Assyrians; Iraq.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bowhead Vs. the Gray Whale in Chukotkan Aboriginal Whaling IGOR I
    ARCTIC VOL. 40, NO. 1 (MARCH 1987) P. 16-32 The Bowhead vs. the Gray Whale in Chukotkan Aboriginal Whaling IGOR I. KRUPNIK’ (Received 5 September 1984; accepted in revised form 22 July 1986) ABSTRACT. Active whaling for large baleen whales -mostly for bowhead (Balaena mysricetus) and gray whales (Eschrichrius robustus)-has been practiced by aborigines on the Chukotka Peninsula since at least the early centuries of the Christian era. Thehistory of native whaling off Chukotka may be divided into four periods according to the hunting methods used and the primary species pursued: ancient or aboriginal (from earliest times up to the second half of the 19th century); rraditional (second half of the 19th century to the1930s); transitional (late 1930s toearly 1960s); and modern (from the early 1960s). The data on bowhead/gray whale bone distribution in theruins of aboriginal coastal sites, available catch data from native settlements from the late 19th century and local oral tradition prove to be valuable sources for identifying specific areas of aboriginal whaling off Chukotka. Until the 1930s, bowhead whales generally predominated in the native catch; gray whales were hunted periodically or locally along restricted parts of the coast. Some 8-10 bowheads and 3-5 gray whales were killed on the average in a “good year”by Chukotka natives during the early 20th century. Around the mid-20th century, however, bowheads were completely replaced by gray whales. On the basis of this experience, the author believes that the substitution of gray whales for bowheads, proposed recently by conservationists for modemAlaska Eskimos, would be unsuccessful.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Protection Guidelines for Alaska
    Wildlife Protection Guidelines for Alaska Alaska Regional Response Team, Wildlife Protection Committee Revision 5 – August 2012 2018 Administrative Update Revision 5 – August 2012 Administrative Update: March 2018 1 Table of Contents I. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... G-5 A. Background G-5 B. Objectives ........................................................................................................................... G-5 C. Scope of Wildlife Protection Guidelines for Alaska ............................................................... G-6 1. Geographic Area ............................................................................................................. G-6 2. Wildlife Resources .......................................................................................................... G-8 3. Wildlife Resource Agencies ............................................................................................. G-8 D. Committee Organization and Development of Guidelines ................................................... G-8 1. Committee Organization ................................................................................................. G-8 2. Development of Guidelines ............................................................................................ G-9 E. Relationship to National Planning Requirements and Guidance .......................................... G-9 F. Procedures for Revisions and
    [Show full text]
  • Moose Hunters in - Southwest Alaska a Better Opportunity to Evaluate Antlers
    280 AN EVALUATION OF TROPHY MOOSE MANAGEMENT ON THE ALASKA PENINSULA Christian A. Smith, Alaska Dept. of Fish and Game, King Salmon, Alaska James B. Faro, Alaska Dept. of Fish and Game, Anchorage, Alaska Nicholas C. Steen, Alaska Dept. of Fish and Game, King Salmon, Alaska '" Abstract: an experimental trophy management program was initiated on the Alaska Peninsula in 1976 with the imple­ mentation of a regulation requiring that all harvested bull moose (AZaes aZaes gigas) have antlers with at least a 50 inch spread. The regulation was designed to protect bulls under 5 years of age, to test the capability of hunters to comply with minimum size requirements, and to determine the potential for maintaining trophy class bulls in the population through this approach. The first two objectives have been accomplished. Nearly 70 - percent of the harvested bulls have been 5 or more years old and only 4 percent of the bulls taken were illegal. Adequate survey data are not available to determine current proportions of trophy bulls in the herd. In view of the declining nature of the population and increasing frequency - of 5 year olds in the kill, however, it seems likely that current harvests may be curtailing recruitment beyond age 5. Although this may not further affect average trophy size, availability of trophy class animals could eventually be - limited to the size of the 5 year old cohort. The moose population of the central Alaska Peninsula, Game Management - Unit 9E, appears to have established via i11111igration southwest from the Naknek River drainage in the early 1930's (Faro 1969).
    [Show full text]
  • Article Is Available On- Rise Derived from Satellite Imagery, Nat
    The Cryosphere, 15, 1845–1862, 2021 https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1845-2021 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Spatially and temporally resolved ice loss in High Mountain Asia and the Gulf of Alaska observed by CryoSat-2 swath altimetry between 2010 and 2019 Livia Jakob1, Noel Gourmelen1,2,3, Martin Ewart1, and Stephen Plummer4 1Earthwave Ltd, Edinburgh, EH9 3HJ, UK 2School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XP, UK 3IPGS UMR 7516, Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, Strasbourg, 67000, France 4European Space Agency, ESA-ESTEC, Noordwijk, 2201 AZ, the Netherlands Correspondence: Livia Jakob ([email protected]) Received: 25 June 2020 – Discussion started: 27 July 2020 Revised: 23 February 2021 – Accepted: 26 February 2021 – Published: 14 April 2021 Abstract. Glaciers are currently the largest contributor to sea HMA ice loss is sustained until 2015–2016, with a slight de- level rise after ocean thermal expansion, contributing ∼ 30 % crease in mass loss from 2016, with some evidence of mass to the sea level budget. Global monitoring of these regions gain locally from 2016–2017 onwards. remains a challenging task since global estimates rely on a variety of observations and models to achieve the required spatial and temporal coverage, and significant differences re- main between current estimates. Here we report the first ap- 1 Introduction plication of a novel approach to retrieve spatially resolved elevation and mass change from radar altimetry over entire Glaciers store less than 1 % of the mass (Farinotti et al., 2019) mountain glaciers areas. We apply interferometric swath al- and occupy just over 4 % of the area (RGI Consortium, 2017) timetry to CryoSat-2 data acquired between 2010 and 2019 of global land ice; however their rapid rate of mass loss has over High Mountain Asia (HMA) and in the Gulf of Alaska accounted for almost a third of the global sea level rise dur- (GoA).
    [Show full text]
  • Aleuts: an Outline of the Ethnic History
    i Aleuts: An Outline of the Ethnic History Roza G. Lyapunova Translated by Richard L. Bland ii As the nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has re- sponsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural and cultural resources. This includes fostering the wisest use of our land and water resources, protecting our fish and wildlife, preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places, and providing for enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Shared Beringian Heritage Program at the National Park Service is an international program that rec- ognizes and celebrates the natural resources and cultural heritage shared by the United States and Russia on both sides of the Bering Strait. The program seeks local, national, and international participation in the preservation and understanding of natural resources and protected lands and works to sustain and protect the cultural traditions and subsistence lifestyle of the Native peoples of the Beringia region. Aleuts: An Outline of the Ethnic History Author: Roza G. Lyapunova English translation by Richard L. Bland 2017 ISBN-13: 978-0-9965837-1-8 This book’s publication and translations were funded by the National Park Service, Shared Beringian Heritage Program. The book is provided without charge by the National Park Service. To order additional copies, please contact the Shared Beringian Heritage Program ([email protected]). National Park Service Shared Beringian Heritage Program © The Russian text of Aleuts: An Outline of the Ethnic History by Roza G. Lyapunova (Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo “Nauka” leningradskoe otdelenie, 1987), was translated into English by Richard L.
    [Show full text]
  • Spanning the Bering Strait
    National Park service shared beringian heritage Program U.s. Department of the interior Spanning the Bering Strait 20 years of collaborative research s U b s i s t e N c e h UN t e r i N c h UK o t K a , r U s s i a i N t r o DU c t i o N cean Arctic O N O R T H E L A Chu a e S T kchi Se n R A LASKA a SIBERIA er U C h v u B R i k R S otk S a e i a P v I A en r e m in i n USA r y s M l u l g o a a S K S ew la c ard Peninsu r k t e e r Riv n a n z uko i i Y e t R i v e r ering Sea la B u s n i CANADA n e P la u a ns k ni t Pe a ka N h las c A lf of Alaska m u a G K W E 0 250 500 Pacific Ocean miles S USA The Shared Beringian Heritage Program has been fortunate enough to have had a sustained source of funds to support 3 community based projects and research since its creation in 1991. Presidents George H.W. Bush and Mikhail Gorbachev expanded their cooperation in the field of environmental protection and the study of global change to create the Shared Beringian Heritage Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change and Human Mobility in Indigenous Communities of the Russian North
    Climate Change and Human Mobility in Indigenous Communities of the Russian North January 30, 2013 Susan A. Crate George Mason University Cover image: Winifried K. Dallmann, Norwegian Polar Institute. http://www.arctic-council.org/index.php/en/about/maps. TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................................... i Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ ii 1. Introduction and Purpose ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Focus of paper and author’s approach................................................................................... 2 1.2 Human mobility in the Russian North: Physical and Cultural Forces .................................. 3 1.2.1 Mobility as the Historical Rule in the Circumpolar North ............................................. 3 1.2.2. Changing the Rules: Mobility and Migration in the Russian and Soviet North ............ 4 1.2.3 Peoples of the Russian North .......................................................................................... 7 1.2.4 The contemporary state: changes affecting livelihoods ................................................. 8 2. Overview of the physical science: actual and potential effects of climate change in the Russian North ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Naukan Yupik Eskimo Dictionary with Implications for A
    Document generated on 09/27/2021 10:28 p.m. Études/Inuit/Studies History of the Naukan Yupik Eskimo dictionary with implications for a future Siberian Yupik dictionary Histoire du dictionnaire Naukan Yupik Eskimo et ses implications pour un futur dictionnaire du Yupik sibérien Steven A. Jacobson Préserver la langue et les savoirs Article abstract Preserving language and knowledge Naukan is a Yupik Eskimo language spoken now by only a few people on the Volume 29, Number 1-2, 2005 Russian side of the Bering Strait, but with strong Alaskan affinities. Naukan speaker Dobrieva of Lavrentiya, linguist Golovko of St. Petersburg, and URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/013937ar linguists Jacobson and Krauss of Fairbanks have compiled a Naukan dictionary DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/013937ar in two parallel volumes: Naukan in a latin-letter orthography to English, and Naukan in the modified Cyrillic alphabet used for Chukotkan Eskimo languages to Russian. It was both appropriate and beneficial that this project See table of contents involved people from Alaska, European Russia, and Chukotka. The dictionary was recently published by the Alaska Native Language Center of the University of Alaska Fairbanks. The Naukan dictionary in two parallel volumes can serve Publisher(s) as a model for a new dictionary of (Central) Siberian Yupik, a language spoken, at least ancestrally, by roughly equal numbers on St. Lawrence Island Alaska Association Inuksiutiit Katimajiit Inc. and in the New Chaplino-Sirenik area of Chukotka, Russia. Such a dictionary Centre interuniversitaire d'études et de recherches autochtones (CIÉRA) could help to reinvigorate that language and allow it better to serve as a bridge between the two halves of a single people and culture divided only in recent ISSN decades by a boundary not of their own making.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science
    Possible New World Affiliations of the Neolithic Baikal People Ben R. Huelsman, Indiana University Of the few well-documented archaeological skeletal series of Siberia, the Neolithic Baikal Type "A" population is of considerable interest because of its widespread ramifications in both Siberia and northwestern North America. This Neolithic population was first described by the Russian physical anthropologist, G. F. Debetz as a result of his examina- tion of a series of skulls from the late neolithic of the Transbaikal region. It is apparent, as Debetz himself recognized, that this neolithic Siberian population resembles somewhat the contemporary Aleut. If the Pre-Aleuts are compared with the Baikal populations, however, the resemblances are even more striking. The Neolithic Baikal population and the Pre-Aleuts share the follow- ing traits: the vault is absolutely long, narrow, and low, the forehead is very sloping, the brow-ridges are moderate in development, and the cranial index is dolichocranial. For both groups the face is typically long and moderately broad in its absolute dimensions; both populations are lepto- prosopic, the upper facial index being mesene; the nasal index is leptor- rhine and the orbital index is hypsiconch. The later Aleut population differs from the Baikal people in being broader and shorter vaulted, the cranial index falling into the brachy- cranial index class. With reference to facial dimensions and profile, how- ever, the present-day Aleut are skeletally still quite close to the Siberian group. The Eskimo also disclose a facial similarity close to the Neolithic Baikal population, but these resemblances are limited to the face. The Neolithic Baikal population is characterized by an extremely low mean cranial height which is apparently due to platybasia, while the Eskimo are one of the most high vaulted groups in North America.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Native
    To conduct a simple search of the many GENERAL records of Alaska’ Native People in the National Archives Online Catalog use the search term Alaska Native. To search specific areas or villages see indexes and information below. Alaska Native Villages by Name A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Alaska is home to 229 federally recognized Alaska Native Villages located across a wide geographic area, whose records are as diverse as the people themselves. Customs, culture, artwork, and native language often differ dramatically from one community to another. Some are nestled within large communities while others are small and remote. Some are urbanized while others practice subsistence living. Still, there are fundamental relationships that have endured for thousands of years. One approach to understanding links between Alaska Native communities is to group them by language. This helps the student or researcher to locate related communities in a way not possible by other means. It also helps to define geographic areas in the huge expanse that is Alaska. For a map of Alaska Native language areas, see the generalized map of Alaska Native Language Areas produced by the University of Alaska at Fairbanks. Click on a specific language below to see Alaska federally recognized communities identified with each language. Alaska Native Language Groups (click to access associated Alaska Native Villages) Athabascan Eyak Tlingit Aleut Eskimo Haida Tsimshian Communities Ahtna Inupiaq with Mixed Deg Hit’an Nanamiut Language Dena’ina (Tanaina)
    [Show full text]