DOCSLIB.ORG

The Study on Jarar Valley and Shebele Sub-Basin Water Supply Development Plan, and Emergency Water Supply in the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Study on Jarar Valley and Shebele Sub-Basin Water Supply Development Plan, and Emergency Water Supply in the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia MINISTRY OF WATER & ENERGY (MoWE) THE FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF ETHIOPIA SOMALI REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT BUREAU THE STUDY ON JARAR VALLEY AND SHEBELE SUB-BASIN WATER SUPPLY DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AND EMERGENCY WATER SUPPLY IN THE FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF ETHIOPIA FINAL REPORT (6/7) SUPPORTING REPORT August 2013 Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) Kokusai Kogyo Co., Ltd. The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Somali Region Location Map of Study Area CONTENTS Location Map Contents List of Tables List of Figures Abbreviations Page: 1 Geophysical Survey ........................................................ 1-1 1.1 Study area and objective of geophysical survey......................................... 1-1 1.1.1 Study area ....................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.2 Objective of geophysical survey..................................................... 1-1 1.2 Survey points .............................................................................................. 1-1 1.2.1 Reasons for selection and number of surveys................................. 1-1 1.2.2 Reconnaissance and selection of prospecting sites......................... 1-2 1.3 Survey method............................................................................................ 1-2 1.3.1 Vertical electric sounding (VES).................................................... 1-2 1.3.2 TEM electro-magnetic sounding (TEM) ........................................ 1-5 1.4 Results of survey and analysis.................................................................. 1-11 1.4.1 VES............................................................................................... 1-11 1.4.2 TEM.............................................................................................. 1-13 1.5 Comparison among VES, TEM and results of drilling ............................ 1-16 1.5.1 Comparison between the TEM and VES results in the Qaaxo-North area................................................................................................ 1-16 1.5.2 Selection of drilling points............................................................ 1-17 1.5.3 Comparison with drilling results................................................... 1-18 1.6 Hydrogeological interpretation by the results of geophysical survey ...... 1-19 1.6.1 Qaaxo-North area.......................................................................... 1-19 1.6.2 Qaaxo-South area.......................................................................... 1-20 1.6.3 Qaaxo-East area ............................................................................ 1-21 2 Well Drilling and Pumping Test ....................................... 2-1 2.1 Purpose and methodology of well drilling ................................................. 2-1 2.1.1 Purpose............................................................................................ 2-1 2.1.2 Methodology................................................................................... 2-2 2.2 Selection of drilling sites ............................................................................ 2-3 2.3 Results of well drilling ............................................................................... 2-6 2.3.1 Summary of drilling work............................................................... 2-6 2.3.2 Lithological conditions ................................................................... 2-6 2.3.3 Results of geophysical logging..................................................... 2-11 2.3.4 Correlation of results between drilling and geophysical survey... 2-13 2.4 Pumping test ............................................................................................. 2-15 2.4.1 Introduction................................................................................... 2-15 2.4.2 Step-drawdown test....................................................................... 2-15 i 2.4.3 Continuous test ............................................................................. 2-20 2.4.4 Recovery test................................................................................. 2-23 2.4.5 Conclusion of pumping test .......................................................... 2-24 2.5 Hydrogeological aspects and prospects.................................................... 2-25 3 Socio-Economic Survey .................................................. 3-1 3.1 General........................................................................................................ 3-1 3.2 Development plan and related Laws .......................................................... 3-2 3.2.1 National level (Federal Ethiopia).................................................... 3-2 3.2.2 Somali region.................................................................................. 3-3 3.3 Socio-economic conditions in the Region.................................................. 3-4 3.3.1 Population and demographic characteristics................................... 3-4 3.3.2 Local administrative divisions........................................................ 3-6 3.3.3 Regional economy .......................................................................... 3-6 3.4 Refugee conditions in the Somali Region .................................................. 3-6 3.5 Analysis of socio-economic survey............................................................ 3-8 3.5.1 Water use survey............................................................................. 3-8 3.5.2 Survey on woreda water supply situation..................................... 3-13 3.5.3 Survey on urban water supply system .......................................... 3-19 4 Environmental and Social Consideration ........................ 4-1 4.1 Title of the project ...................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Name of the proponent ............................................................................... 4-1 4.2.1 Responsible organization................................................................ 4-1 4.2.2 Implementing organization............................................................. 4-1 4.3 Introduction of the project .......................................................................... 4-1 4.3.1 Introduction..................................................................................... 4-1 4.3.2 Background..................................................................................... 4-2 4.3.3 Outline of the project components.................................................. 4-2 4.4 Outline of the water supply plan................................................................. 4-4 4.4.1 Urban water supply plan................................................................. 4-4 4.4.2 Rural water supply plan .................................................................. 4-7 4.5 Environmental and social categorization.................................................... 4-8 4.5.1 Categorization................................................................................. 4-8 4.5.2 Account........................................................................................... 4-8 4.6 Location of the project.............................................................................. 4-10 4.6.1 Project site..................................................................................... 4-10 4.6.2 Social conditions........................................................................... 4-10 4.6.3 Natural environment ..................................................................... 4-16 4.6.4 Environmental pollution ............................................................... 4-19 4.7 Alternatives (zero option case)................................................................. 4-21 4.8 Results of environmental and social impact assessment .......................... 4-22 4.9 Mitigation ................................................................................................. 4-26 ii 4.10 Conclusion................................................................................................ 4-27 ANNEX ANNEX 1 Minutes of Meeting M/M-0 Minutes of Meeting on Inception Report M/M-1 Minutes of Meeting on First Steering Committee M/M-2 Minutes of Meeting on Second Steering Committee M/M-3 Minutes of Meeting on Third Steering Committee ANNEX 2 Confirmation Letter K-1 Confirmation Letter on the Supply and Management of the Equipment and Facilities for the Pilot Project in Kabribeyah Town iii List of Tables Page: Table 1.1: Number of Geophysical Survey ................................................................... 1-1 Table 1.2: Types of Geophysical Survey in Each Area................................................. 1-1 Table 1.3: Schlumberger Electrode Spacing ................................................................. 1-3 Table 1.4: Specs of the Electrical Survey Instrument ................................................... 1-3 Table 1.5: TEM Measuring System............................................................................... 1-7 Table 1.6: Sampling Schedule for the Transmitter........................................................ 1-7 Table 1.7: Classification of Resistivity Values ........................................................... 1-13 Table 1.8: Comparison between Geology and Geophysical Survey Results in Drilling Sites ........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Districts of Ethiopia
    Region District or Woredas Zone Remarks Afar Region Argobba Special Woreda -- Independent district/woredas Afar Region Afambo Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Asayita Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Chifra Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Dubti Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Elidar Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Kori Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Mille Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Abala Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Afdera Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Berhale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Dallol Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Erebti Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Koneba Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Megale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Amibara Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Awash Fentale Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Bure Mudaytu Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Dulecha Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Gewane Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Aura Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Ewa Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Gulina Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Teru Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Yalo Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Dalifage (formerly known as Artuma) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Dewe Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Hadele Ele (formerly known as Fursi) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Simurobi Gele'alo Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Telalak Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Amhara Region Achefer -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Angolalla Terana Asagirt -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Artuma Fursina Jile -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Banja -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Belessa --
    [Show full text]
  • 1 DRC Protection Assessment Report in IDP Sites in Afder Zone October
    DRC Protection assessment Report in IDP sites in Afder Zone October 2018 1 Contents 1. Introduction ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------3 2. Scope of the assessment -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 3. Objective of the assessment ---------------------------------------------------------------------4 3.1 General Objectives--------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 3.2 Specific Objectives------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------4 4. Composition of the Assessment team---------------------------------------------------------- -4 5. Ethical considerations -----------------------------------------------------------------------------5 6. Methodology and assessment tools---------------------------------------------------------------5 7. Major challenges during assessment-------------------------------------------------------------6 8. Key Findings----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7 8.1 Bare 01 IDP site ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------7 8.2 Den Adine IDP site ----------------------------------------------------------------------------10 8.3 Weydkal IDP site ------------------------------------------------------------------------------10 8.4 Allana IDP site ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------12 8.5 Darso IDP site-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------14
    [Show full text]
  • Hum Ethio Manitar Opia Rian Re Espons E Fund D
    Hum anitarian Response Fund Ethiopia OCHA, 2011 OCHA, 2011 Annual Report 2011 Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011 Table of Contents Note from the Humanitarian Coordinator ................................................................................................ 2 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................. 3 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 2011 Humanitarian Context ........................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Map - 2011 HRF Supported Projects ............................................................................................. 6 2. Information on Contributors ................................................................................................................ 7 2.1 Donor Contributions to HRF .......................................................................................................... 7 3. Fund Overview .................................................................................................................................... 8 3.1 Summary of HRF Allocations in 2011 ............................................................................................ 8 3.1.1 HRF Allocation by Sector .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Prioritization of Shelter/NFI Needs
    Prioritization of Shelter/NFI needs Date: 31st May 2018 Shelter and NFI Needs As of 18 May 2018, the overall number of displaced people is 345,000 households. This figure is based on DTM round 10, partner’s assessments, government requests, as well as the total of HH supported since July 2017. The S/NFI updated its prioritisation in early May and SNFI Cluster partners agreed on several criteria to guide prioritisation which include: - 1) type of emergency, 2) duration of displacement, and 3) sub-standard shelter conditions including IDPS hosted in collective centres and open-air sites and 4) % of vulnerable HH at IDP sites. Thresholds for the criteria were also agreed and in the subsequent analysis the cluster identified 193 IDP hosting woredas mostly in Oromia and Somali regions, as well as Tigray, Gambella and Addis Ababa municipality. A total of 261,830 HH are in need of urgent shelter and NFI assistance. At present the Cluster has a total of 57,000 kits in stocks and pipeline. The Cluster requires urgent funding to address the needs of 204,830 HHs that are living in desperate displacement conditions across the country. This caseload is predicted to increase as the flooding continues in the coming months. Shelter and NFI Priority Activities In terms of priority activities, the SNFI Cluster is in need of ES/NFI support for 140,259 HH displaced mainly due to flood and conflict under Pillar 2, primarily in Oromia and Somali Regions. In addition, the Shelter and NFI Cluster requires immediate funding for recovery activities to support 14,000 HH (8,000 rebuild and 6,000 repair) with transitional shelter support and shelter repair activities under Pillar 3.
    [Show full text]
  • IOM in Ethiopia IOM PRESENCEIOM Presence in Ethiopia in ETHIOPIA2021
    0 IOM in Ethiopia IOM PRESENCEIOM Presence in Ethiopia IN ETHIOPIA2021 Dalol ERITREA TIGRAY Shire Central YEMEN Western Welkait Tselemti Afdera Zone 2 North Gondar Mekele SUDAN Metema Bidu LEGEND Kinfaz Central Gondar Ofla Teru Kurri Country Office Zone 4 Elidar West Gondar Takusa Quara Lake Tana Alfa Zone 1 DJIBOUTI Jawi North Wello Ewa Sub-Offices Chifra Semera Guba AMHARA Dangura Bahir Dar Mile Migration Response Adaa'r Awi Centres (MRCs) Metekel South Wello AFAR Ayisha Wenbera Medical Health Assessment Gablalu East Gojam Gewane Centre (MHAC) Siti BENISHANGUL GUMUZ Zone 3 Shinile Dembel Transit centres Assossa East Togochale Kemashi North Shewa Wellega Horo Guduru North Shewa SOMALIA DIRE DAWA SOUTH SUDAN West Wellega Nekemte 3 Country Capital West Shewa HARARI Jigjiga Fafan Kelem Wellega Harshin ADDIS ABABA East Hararge Regional Capitals South West Hararge West Shewa East Shewa Buno Bedele Daror Itang Ilu Aba Bora Guraghe Fik Disputed Boundaries elit, Gashamo ng ci is p i Jarar d a Gambela r e u t e t c e s Akobo n co t, me t a Arsi i r s Jimma GAMBELA lo Lege Hida Erer o d m u s p i Siltie m e r o Seru Galhamur Agnewak L Burqod Dig International Boundary Cheka Hadiya Sagag Bokh Gog Danod Garbo Kefa OROMIA Seweyna Marsin Doolo Dima Ayun Nogob Regional Boundary Bench Maji Dawuro West Arsi Konta Wolayita Hawassa SOMALI Galadi Rayitu Goglo Warder Bale East Imi SNNPR Sidama Danan Zone Boundary Korahe Gofa Mirab Omo Gamo Gedeo Countries Surma Maji Elkare/Serer Shilabo Male Amaro Meda Welabu Shabelle Bule Hora Guji Water Bodies Hargele Adadle South Omo West Guji Kelafo Konso Liben Charati Afder Ferfer Liban Hamer Filtu Arero Elwaya Yabelo Teltale Barey Dolobay Borena Wachile Mubarek Daawa Dilo Dhas Dolo Ado KENYA Dire Moyale Miyo UGANDA Sources: CSA 2007, ESRI, IOM Date: 3 February 2019 Disclaimer : This map is for illustration purposes only.
    [Show full text]
  • Undernutrition Prevalence and Its Determinants Among Children Below Five Years of Age in Shabelle Zone, Somali Region, Eastern Ethiopia
    UNDERNUTRITION PREVALENCE AND ITS DETERMINANTS AMONG CHILDREN BELOW FIVE YEARS OF AGE IN SHABELLE ZONE, SOMALI REGION, EASTERN ETHIOPIA RASHID ABDI GULED, MPHIL. (CORRESPONDING AUTHOR) INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY MALAYSIA, JIJIGA UNIVERSITY ETHIOPIA Email: [email protected] NIK MAZLAN BIN MAMAT, PhD DEPARTMENT OF NUTRITION SCIENCES KULLIYAH OF ALLIED HEALTH SCIENCES INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY MALAYSIA, KUANTAN CAMPUS E-mail: [email protected] WAN AZDIE MOHD ABU BAKAR, PhD DEPARTMENT OF NUTRITION SCIENCES KULLIYAH OF ALLIED HEALTH SCIENCES INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY MALAYSIA E-mail:[email protected] TEFERA BELACHEW, PhD DIRECTOR SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES JIMMA UNIVERSITY ETHIOPIA E-mail: [email protected] NEGA ASSEFA, PhD DIRECTOR FOR RESEARCH AND PARTNERSHIPS HARAMAYA UNIVERSITY ETHIOPIA E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Introduction: Malnutrition is a major public health problem worldwide. More than half of under-five child deaths are due to undernutrition, mainly in developing countries. Ethiopia is among the highest in Sub-Saharan Africa. While, Somali region is the worst in Ethiopia. Objection: This study aims to assess the prevalence and determinants of undernutrition among under-five children living in Gode and Adadle districts of Shabelle Zone, Somali region. Methods: A cross sectional study was carried out in August, 2014 among 415 child- mothers/caregivers. Face-to-face interview using a standard questionnaire, scales and stadiometer measurements of children’s weight and height were done. Bivariate analysis to identify candidate variable for multivariable analysis were done. Multivariable linear regression were used to determine predictors for undernutrition.Results: Out 415 children, 30.4% were stunted, 21.0% underweight, and 20.2% wasted, out of which 17.3%, 9.9% and 8.0% were severely stunted, wasted, and underweight, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report Drought Emergency Response Areas: Afar and Liben October to November 2014
    Pastoralist Areas Resilience Improvement Market Expansion (PRIME) Final Report Drought Emergency Response Areas: Afar and Liben October to November 2014 Report Submitted by: Mercy Corps Report submitted to: USAID/OFDA March 2015 Overview Organization Name Mercy Corps USAID Development Program Title Pastoralists Areas Resilience Improvement through Market Expansion (PRIME) Fodder voucher interventions in drought affected woredas of Program Title Liben zone in Somali and Gebi Resu (zone 3) in Afar regional states Sector Name Agriculture and Food Security To respond to deteriorated pasture conditions resulting from seasonal rainfall failure in target pastoralist areas, and prevent further decrease in productivity of livestock and losses of Objective productive assets of pastoral households in target affected areas. To protect development gains of PRIME in the above areas. Indicator 1: Number of animals benefiting from or affected by livestock activities 20,588 livestock assisted Indicator 2: Total number of critical market actors (e.g., producers, suppliers, traders, processers) directly assisted Indicators 309 small-scale fodder/feed suppliers, 2 wholesalers (commercial fodder supplier) and 4 local retailers participated Indicator 3. Number of people benefiting from livestock activities 9543 HHs (66,801 persons) benefited 1 Dollar Amount Financed USD 1,000,000 Target: 6,500 HHs (3,250 HHs in zone 3 of Afar and 3,250 HHs in Liben zone); 10,000 Livestock (5,000 in Afar and Number of People and Livestock Targeted 5,000 in Liben) Achieved:
    [Show full text]
  • Table: Belg 2015 Emergency Food Required Beneficiaries' T I G R
    Table: Belg 2015 Emergency Food Required Beneficiaries' Beneficeries Duration Food Requirement Mt Name of Starting Region Zone Endorsed by of Woreda month Cereal Supp. Food Oil Pulses Total Region Assistance Tigray Atsebiwonberta 18,500 5 August 1,387.50 145.69 41.63 138.75 1,713.56 Gulomekeda 14,153 5 August 1,061.48 111.45 31.84 106.15 1,310.92 Hawzien 18,225 5 August 1,366.88 143.52 41.01 136.69 1,688.09 Eastern Sa/Tsa/Emba 26,070 5 August 1,955.25 205.30 58.66 195.53 2,414.73 Erop 8,290 5 August 621.75 65.28 18.65 62.18 767.86 K/Awlaello 15,014 5 August 1,126.05 118.24 33.78 112.61 1,390.67 G/Afeshum 17,623 5 August 1,321.73 138.78 39.65 132.17 1,632.33 Zone Total 117,875 - 8,840.63 928.27 265.22 884.06 10,918.17 Enderta 12,065 5 August 904.88 95.01 27.15 90.49 1,117.52 South Seharti-Samre 12,261 5 August 919.58 96.56 27.59 91.96 1,135.68 East D/Temben 17,800 5 August 1,335.00 140.18 40.05 133.50 1,648.73 Hintalo-Wajerat 27,574 5 August 2,068.05 217.15 62.04 206.81 2,554.04 Zone Total 69,700 - 5,227.50 548.89 156.83 522.75 6,455.96 R/Alamata 15,000 5 August 1,125.00 118.13 33.75 112.50 1,389.38 R/Azebo 36,681 5 August 2,751.08 288.86 82.53 275.11 3,397.58 T Southern Endamehoni 15,907 5 August 1,193.03 125.27 35.79 119.30 1,473.39 i Ofla 15,000 5 August 1,125.00 118.13 33.75 112.50 1,389.38 E/Alage 11,415 5 August 856.13 89.89 25.68 85.61 1,057.31 g Zone Total 94,003 - 7,050.23 740.27 211.51 705.02 8,707.03 r Adwa 2,000 5 August 150.00 15.75 4.50 15.00 185.25 Ahferom 20,215 5 August 1,516.13 159.19 45.48 151.61 1,872.41 a Kola Temben
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL EVALUATION of “Emergency Program to Assist the Vulnerable
    FINAL EVALUATION of “Emergency program to assist the vulnerable people in LIBAN Woreda, Borena Zone of Oromia Regional State FILTU Woreda, Liben Zone of Somali Regional State” Funded by USAID OFDA June 2002 By: Carlo Maconi Index of contents 1 SUMMARY 1 2 BACK GROUND 3 2.1 GOVERNMENT/POLICY SUPPORT 3 2.2 FEATURES OF THE SUB SECTOR 3 2.3 BENEFICIARIES & PARTIES INVOLVED 3 2.4 PROBLEMS TO BE ADDRESSED 5 2.5 OTHER INTERVENTIONS 6 2.6 DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE 7 3 INTERVENTION ACHIEVED 8 3.1 OVERALL OBJECTIVE 8 3.2 PROJECT PURPOSE 8 3.3 RESULTS 8 3.4 EFFECTIVENESS 13 3.5 OVERALL OUTCOME AND IMPACT 13 3.6 ACTIVITIES 15 4 ASSUMPTION 16 5 IMPLEMENTATION 17 5.1 ORGANIZATION AND IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURES 17 5.2 TIMETABLE 17 5.3 COSTS AND FINANCING PLAN 18 5.4 SPECIAL CONDITIONS/ACCOMPANYING MEASURES TAKEN BY GOVERNMENT 18 6 SUSTAINABILITY 19 6.1 POLICY SUPPORT 19 6.2 APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY 19 6.3 SOCIO CULTURAL ASPECTS 19 6.4 INSTITUTIONAL AND MANAGEMENT CAPACITY 20 7 MONITORING & EVALUATION 22 7.1 DEFINITION OF INDICATORS 22 7.2 REVIEWS/EVALUATION 22 8 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMANDATIONS 22 Final Evaluation Project title: “Emergency program to assist vulnerable people in Liben and Filtu Woreda” 1 SUMMARY COOPI is an International Non Governmental Organization based in Italy-Milan. In Ethiopia COOPI is working since 1995 and it’s headquarter is located in Addis Ababa. Among the different projects that COOPI has been implementing in draught affected areas of the country like Somali Region and low land part of Oromiya Region, the project entitled by “Emergency program to assist vulnerable people in Liben Zone-Somali National Regional state and Borena Zone-Oromia regional state” was funded by USAID/OFDA is one.
    [Show full text]
  • Somali Region: Multi – Agency Deyr/Karan 2012 Seasonal Assessment Report
    SOMALI REGION: MULTI – AGENCY DEYR/KARAN 2012 SEASONAL ASSESSMENT REPORT REGION Somali Regional State November 24 – December 18, 2012 DATE ASSESSMENT STARTED & COMPLETED TEAM MEMBERS – Regional analysis and report NAME AGENCY Ahmed Abdirahman{Ali-eed} SCI Ahmed Mohamed FAO Adawe Warsame UNICEF Teyib Sheriff Nur FAO Mahado Kasim UNICEF Mohamed Mohamud WFP Name of the Agencies Participated Deyr 2012 Need Assessment Government Bureaus DRMFSS, DPPB,RWB,LCRDB,REB,RHB,PCDP UN – WFP,UNICEF,OCHA,FAO,WHO Organization INGO SCI,MC,ADRA,IRC,CHF,OXFAMGB,Intermon Oxfam, IR,SOS,MSFH,ACF LNGO HCS,OWDA,UNISOD,DAAD,ADHOC,SAAD,KRDA 1: BACKGROUND Somali Region is one of largest regions of Ethiopia. The region comprises of nine administrative zones which in terms of livelihoods are categorised into 17 livelihood zones. The climate is mostly arid/semi-arid in lowland areas and cooler/wetter in the higher areas. Annual rainfall ranges from 150 - ~600mm per year. The region can be divided into two broader rainfall regimes based on the seasons of the year: Siti and Fafan zones to the north, and the remaining seven zones to the south. The rainfall pattern for both is bimodal but the timings differ slightly. The southern seven zones (Nogob, Jarar, Korahe, Doollo, Shabelle, Afder, Liban and Harshin District of Fafan Zone) receive ‘Gu’ rains (main season) from mid April to end of June, and secondary rains known as ‘Deyr’ from early October to late December. In the north, Siti and Fafan zones excluding Harshin of Fafan zone receive ‘Dirra’ - Objectives of the assessment also known as ‘Gu’ rains from late March To evaluate the outcome of the Deyr/Karan to late May.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia: Administrative Map (August 2017)
    Ethiopia: Administrative map (August 2017) ERITREA National capital P Erob Tahtay Adiyabo Regional capital Gulomekeda Laelay Adiyabo Mereb Leke Ahferom Red Sea Humera Adigrat ! ! Dalul ! Adwa Ganta Afeshum Aksum Saesie Tsaedaemba Shire Indasilase ! Zonal Capital ! North West TigrayTahtay KoraroTahtay Maychew Eastern Tigray Kafta Humera Laelay Maychew Werei Leke TIGRAY Asgede Tsimbila Central Tigray Hawzen Medebay Zana Koneba Naeder Adet Berahile Region boundary Atsbi Wenberta Western Tigray Kelete Awelallo Welkait Kola Temben Tselemti Degua Temben Mekele Zone boundary Tanqua Abergele P Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Tsegede Tselemt Mekele Town Special Enderta Afdera Addi Arekay South East Ab Ala Tsegede Mirab Armacho Beyeda Woreda boundary Debark Erebti SUDAN Hintalo Wejirat Saharti Samre Tach Armacho Abergele Sanja ! Dabat Janamora Megale Bidu Alaje Sahla Addis Ababa Ziquala Maychew ! Wegera Metema Lay Armacho Wag Himra Endamehoni Raya Azebo North Gondar Gonder ! Sekota Teru Afar Chilga Southern Tigray Gonder City Adm. Yalo East Belesa Ofla West Belesa Kurri Dehana Dembia Gonder Zuria Alamata Gaz Gibla Zone 4 (Fantana Rasu ) Elidar Amhara Gelegu Quara ! Takusa Ebenat Gulina Bugna Awra Libo Kemkem Kobo Gidan Lasta Benishangul Gumuz North Wello AFAR Alfa Zone 1(Awsi Rasu) Debre Tabor Ewa ! Fogera Farta Lay Gayint Semera Meket Guba Lafto DPubti DJIBOUTI Jawi South Gondar Dire Dawa Semen Achefer East Esite Chifra Bahir Dar Wadla Delanta Habru Asayita P Tach Gayint ! Bahir Dar City Adm. Aysaita Guba AMHARA Dera Ambasel Debub Achefer Bahirdar Zuria Dawunt Worebabu Gambela Dangura West Esite Gulf of Aden Mecha Adaa'r Mile Pawe Special Simada Thehulederie Kutaber Dangila Yilmana Densa Afambo Mekdela Tenta Awi Dessie Bati Hulet Ej Enese ! Hareri Sayint Dessie City Adm.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency Drought Response Project in Gode, Adadle, Kelafo and Mustahil Woredas of Gode Zone, Somali Region
    Final Project Evaluation Emergency Drought Response Project in Gode, Adadle, Kelafo and Mustahil Woredas of Gode Zone, Somali Region Participatory Research and Evaluation Consultancy (PRE) August 2012 Content SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................IV 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1 1.1 CONTEXT OF THE PROJECT INTERVENTION AREA ......................................................... 1 1.2 BACKGROUND TO SC UK’ S EMERGENCY DROUGHT RESPONSE ........................................ 2 2. THE FINAL EVALUATION ........................................................................................ 4 2.1 SCOPE OF THE EVALUATION .................................................................................. 4 2.2 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................. 4 2.2.1 Overall approach......................................................................................... 4 2.2.2 Desk review................................................................................................ 5 2.2.3 Field assessment......................................................................................... 5 2.2.4 Data collection and analysis ......................................................................... 9 3. EVALUATION FINDINGS ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]